European elites and the narrative of the Greek crisis: a discursive institutionalist analysis EUSA Fifteenth Biennial Conference May 4-6, 2017 Miami Florida Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay Prof. Dimitris Papadimitriou, University of Manchester Dr. Adonis Pegasiou, University of Cyprus Dr. Sotirios Zartaloudis, University of Birmingham Contact:
[email protected] 1 Abstract The paper examines elite European discourses during the Greek financial crisis from its pre- history in September 2008 up to the arrival of the SYRIZA government in January 2015. The article employs the conceptual literature on Discursive Institutionalism (DI) and Historical Institutionalism (HI). Having coded 1,164 unique quotes drawn from a dataset of 15,909 news wires from Reuters, the article argues that the communicative discourse of 72 senior European and IMF officials on the Greek crisis during that period demonstrates significant volatility. We identify four distinct narrative frames: ‘denial', ‘suspicious cooperation’, ‘blame’ and ‘reluctant redemption’, punctuated by three discursive junctures in 2010, 2011 and 2012, which reflect the content of the changing communicative discourse of the Greek crisis. The article’s contribution is twofold: empirically, it is the first article to provide a systematic analysis of the protagonists' communication of the Greek crisis; theoretically, it combines DI and HI in an effort to conceptualise an important part of our understanding of ‘bailout politics’ throughout the Eurozone crisis. 2 Introduction There is no shortage of literature discussing the Eurozone crisis and the deficiencies of the EU’s economic architecture in recent years (see, for example: Dinan 2012; Bulmer & Paterson 2013; Dyson 2013; Panizza & Phillip 2013; Pisani-Ferry2014).