DOCSLIB.ORG

Brook, Mark N. (2010) Cosmology Meets Condensed Matter. Phd Thesis, University of Nottingham

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brook, Mark N. (2010) Cosmology Meets Condensed Matter. Phd Thesis, University of Nottingham Brook, Mark N. (2010) Cosmology meets condensed matter. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11250/1/Mark_Brook_PhD_Thesis.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] Cosmology Meets Condensed Matter Mark N. Brook Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. July 2010 The Feynman Problem-Solving Algorithm: 1. Write down the problem 2. Think very hard 3. Write down the answer – R. P. Feynman att. to M. Gell-Mann Supervisor: Prof. Peter Coles Examiners: Prof. Ed Copeland Prof. Ray Rivers Abstract This thesis is concerned with the interface of cosmology and condensed matter. Although at either end of the scale spectrum, the two disciplines have more in common than one might think. Condensed matter theorists and high-energy field theorists study, usually independently, phenomena embedded in the structure of a quantum field theory. It would appear at first glance that these phenomena are disjoint, and this has often led to the two fields developing their own procedures and strategies, and adopting their own nomenclature. We will look at some concepts that have helped bridge the gap between the two sub- jects, enabling progress in both, before incorporating condensed matter techniques to our own cosmological model. By considering ideas from cosmological high-energy field theory, we then critically examine other models of astrophysical condensed mat- ter phenomena. In Chapter 1, we introduce the current cosmological paradigm, and present a somewhat historical overview of the interplay between cosmology and condensed matter. Many concepts are introduced here that later chapters will follow up on, and we give some examples in which condensed matter physics has had a very real effect on informing cosmology. We also reflect on the most recent incarnations of the condensed matter / cosmology interplay, and the future of these developments. Chapter 2 presents the Einstein-Klein-Gordon system of equations and their non-relat- ivistic and nonlinear counterparts, the Schr¨odinger-Poisson, and nonlinear Schr¨odinger (Gross Pitaevskii)-Poisson systems. We give a more technical overview of the various applications of these systems of equations, as well as discussing the role and interpre- tation of condensates in the field of cosmology. Abstract iii In Chapter 3 we discuss more qualitatively the fluid-mechanical methods used in a wave-mechanical approach to structure formation, and in formulations of condensed matter models. Taking a lead from the condensed matter side, we look at some of the details of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, particularly with regard to quantum vortices, and then put this quantum-mechanical system into a cosmological environment by coupling it to the Poisson equation, in an effort to pin down some of the parameters that may be consistent with the existence of vortices in a cosmological Bose-Einstein condensate. In Chapter 4 we turn to high-energy field theory and elucidate further some of the re- lationships with condensed matter physics that are present. We also critically examine a Bose-Einstein dark matter model in light of these considerations. Chapter 5 rounds off with a discussion and suggestions for further work based upon models we have discussed, as well as some ideas for models that have not yet been mentioned. An appendix discusses techniques for moving from the relativistic Einstein-Klein- Gordon equations to the Schr¨odinger-Poisson system. Acknowledgements Gratitude is extended to those who have conspired to keep my life interesting. Includ- ing, but not limited, to: David, Will, Edo, Jensen, Ryan, Sarah, Thea, Dan, Nic, Ben, Karen, Seb, Charlotte, Jon, Hari, Tony, Abigail, Ben, Dave, Matt, Bruce, Holger, Kiera, Martin, Bethan, Ed, Mike, Peter, Meghan, Kate, Kathleen, Omar, Paul, Nicky, Dan, Rob, Evelyn, Amanda, Beth, David, Lisa, Dolf, Emma, Steph, Dan, Mike, Ruth, Amanda, Ian, Malgorzata, Joe, Peter, Tom, Jesse, Amie, Jen, Shannon, Troy, Fred, Tiana, Charles, Justine, Joe, Richard, Andrew, Philip, Frazer, Anita, David, Ray, Sophie, BJ, Kyle, Carl, Chris, June, Simon, Sean, Gemma, Iris, David, Mike, Christine, Rowena, Janine, Emma, Gustavo, Emmaline, Dale, Jon, Katrina, David, Peter, Aman, Jonathan, Kate, Chris, Kev, Boris, Magda, Mark, Dave, Carly, Lizzy, Belinka, Elisa, Judith, Daniele, Jes´us, Dan, Maryam, Marco, Natasha, Giordano, Riccardo, Marion, Lynne, Jennie, Danny, Phillip, Harvey, Anne, Tim, Duncan, Mitsuo, Graeme, Marianne, Bec, Karima, Marco, Kate, Julie, Ben, Martyn, Clare, Michelle, Nara, Nat, Phil, Fiona, Caitlin, Alberto, Ned, Karen, Alessandra, Rachael, Alkistis, Becca, Tom, Claire, Gary, Martin, Arianna, Yara, Olivia, Philip. Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iv List of Figures and Tables viii 1 Cosmology and Condensed Matter 1 1.1 Cosmology ............................... 1 1.1.1 TheBirthofGeneralRelativity. 1 1.1.2 InflationandDarkEnergy . 13 1.1.3 The Traditional Approach to Structure Formation . 27 1.1.4 DarkMatter........................... 30 1.2 CosmologyMeetsCondensedMatter. 38 1.2.1 The‘Higgs-Anderson’mechanism . 39 1.2.2 Kibble-Zurek mechanism - Condensed Matter again informs Cosmology ........................... 41 1.3 TheFutureofMulti-DisciplinaryResearch . 45 1.4 Discussion................................ 48 2 Technical Background 49 2.1 BeyondColdDarkMatter. 50 2.2 A Wave-Mechanical Approach to Structure Formation . 52 2.3 QuantumMechanicalDarkMatter . 55 2.3.1 DarkMatterasaBose-EinsteinCondensate . 56 2.4 ScalarFieldDarkMatter . 59 2.4.1 Scalar Fieldsand Bose-EinsteinCondensation . 63 2.5 ExoticObjects.............................. 66 2.5.1 BosonStars ........................... 66 2.5.2 Oscillatons ........................... 68 2.6 PenroseandtheQuantumStateReductionProblem . 69 CONTENTS vi 2.7 Discussion................................ 71 3 The nonlinear Schrodinger¨ Equation in Condensed Matter and Cosmol- ogy 73 3.1 TheBose-EinsteinCondensate . 74 3.2 TheGross-PitaevskiiEquation . 77 3.2.1 TheMadelungTransformation . 82 3.2.2 Vortices ............................. 83 3.2.3 ApproximationstotheDensityProfile . 86 3.3 The Wave-Mechanical Approach to Structure Formation . 88 3.4 Gravitational Stability of Vortices in Bose-Einstein Condensate Dark Matter.................................. 90 3.4.1 Vortices in Gravitationally Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates 92 3.4.2 Vortex Stability in Gravitationally Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates........................... 93 3.4.3 BoundsonParameters . 95 3.4.4 Results ............................. 99 3.5 Discussion................................ 100 4 Relations to Field Theory 105 4.1 ComparisonofRelatedModels . 106 4.1.1 TheAbelian-HiggsModel . 106 4.1.2 TheGoldstoneModel. 110 4.1.3 TheLandau-GinzburgModel . 111 4.1.4 TheGross-PitaevskiiEquation . 113 4.2 The Relationship between Bose-Einstein Condensation and Sponta- neousSymmetryBreaking, and the Role of Temperature . 115 4.3 TheAxion................................ 120 4.4 The Domain Wall Problem in a Model of Bose-Einstein Condensate DarkMatter ............................... 123 4.4.1 TheModel ........................... 124 4.4.2 Existence of Domain Walls in the Silverman-Mallett Model . 125 4.4.3 Cosmological Constraints on the Existence of Domain Walls . 125 4.4.4 Mass and Symmetry-Breaking Parameters in the Silverman- MallettModel.......................... 127 4.4.5 FinalRemarks.......................... 129 4.5 Discussion................................ 130 CONTENTS vii 5 Conclusions and Further Work 133 A From Einstein-Klein-Gordon to Schrodinger-Poisson¨ 138 Bibliography 142 List of Figures 1.1 Hubble’s original data [23], compared with that of more recent surveys (see Kirshner [24] for image and data references). Note the difference inscale. ................................. 7 1.2 Comparison of Λ CDM models. From Choudhury and Padmanabhan [99]. Observational data points are obtained from the ‘Gold’ sample of Riess et al. [100] from the High-z Supernova Search. 24 1.3 Equation of state. From the Supernova Cosmology Project [89]. 25 1.4 Temperature anisotropies from WMAP 5 year data [101]. 26 1.5 PowerspectrumfromWMAP5yeardata[102]. 27 3.1 Numeric solution to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Philosophy of Physics
    The Philosophy of Physics ROBERTO TORRETTI University of Chile PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014, Madrid, Spain © Roberto Torretti 1999 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1999 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Sabon 10.25/13 pt. System QuarkXPress [BTS] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. 0 521 56259 7 hardback 0 521 56571 5 paperback Contents Preface xiii 1 The Transformation of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century 1 1.1 Mathematics and Experiment 2 1.2 Aristotelian Principles 8 1.3 Modern Matter 13 1.4 Galileo on Motion 20 1.5 Modeling and Measuring 30 1.5.1 Huygens and the Laws of Collision 30 1.5.2 Leibniz and the Conservation of “Force” 33 1.5.3 Rømer and the Speed of Light 36 2 Newton 41 2.1 Mass and Force 42 2.2 Space and Time 50 2.3 Universal Gravitation 57 2.4 Rules of Philosophy 69 2.5 Newtonian Science 75 2.5.1 The Cause of Gravity 75 2.5.2 Central Forces 80 2.5.3 Analytical
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Newtonian Dynamics: an Axiomatic Approach For
    Foundations of Newtonian Dynamics: 1 An Axiomatic Approach for the Thinking Student C. J. Papachristou 2 Department of Physical Sciences, Hellenic Naval Academy, Piraeus 18539, Greece Abstract. Despite its apparent simplicity, Newtonian mechanics contains conceptual subtleties that may cause some confusion to the deep-thinking student. These subtle- ties concern fundamental issues such as, e.g., the number of independent laws needed to formulate the theory, or, the distinction between genuine physical laws and deriva- tive theorems. This article attempts to clarify these issues for the benefit of the stu- dent by revisiting the foundations of Newtonian dynamics and by proposing a rigor- ous axiomatic approach to the subject. This theoretical scheme is built upon two fun- damental postulates, namely, conservation of momentum and superposition property for interactions. Newton’s laws, as well as all familiar theorems of mechanics, are shown to follow from these basic principles. 1. Introduction Teaching introductory mechanics can be a major challenge, especially in a class of students that are not willing to take anything for granted! The problem is that, even some of the most prestigious textbooks on the subject may leave the student with some degree of confusion, which manifests itself in questions like the following: • Is the law of inertia (Newton’s first law) a law of motion (of free bodies) or is it a statement of existence (of inertial reference frames)? • Are the first two of Newton’s laws independent of each other? It appears that
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Cosmic Probes of Ultra-Light Axion Dark Matter
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Cosmic probes of ultra-light axion dark matter Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (TF09) Astro-particle physics and cosmology Contact Information: Name (Institution) [email]: Keir K. Rogers (Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University; Dunlap Institute, University of Toronto) [ [email protected]] Authors: Simeon Bird (UC Riverside), Simon Birrer (Stanford University), Djuna Croon (TRIUMF), Alex Drlica-Wagner (Fermilab, University of Chicago), Jeff A. Dror (UC Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Daniel Grin (Haverford College), David J. E. Marsh (Georg-August University Goettingen), Philip Mocz (Princeton), Ethan Nadler (Stanford), Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (University of New Hamp- shire), Keir K. Rogers (Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University; Dunlap Insti- tute, University of Toronto), Katelin Schutz (MIT), Neelima Sehgal (Stony Brook University), Yu-Dai Tsai (Fermilab), Tien-Tien Yu (University of Oregon), Yimin Zhong (University of Chicago). Abstract: Ultra-light axions are a compelling dark matter candidate, motivated by the string axiverse, the strong CP problem in QCD, and possible tensions in the CDM model. They are hard to probe experimentally, and so cosmological/astrophysical observations are very sensitive to the distinctive gravitational phenomena of ULA dark matter. There is the prospect of probing fifteen orders of magnitude in mass, often down to sub-percent contributions to the DM in the next ten to twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin of the Inertia: the Modified Newtonian Dynamics Theory
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repositori Obert UdL ON THE ORIGIN OF THE INERTIA: THE MODIFIED NEWTONIAN DYNAMICS THEORY JAUME GINE¶ Abstract. The sameness between the inertial mass and the grav- itational mass is an assumption and not a consequence of the equiv- alent principle is shown. In the context of the Sciama's inertia theory, the sameness between the inertial mass and the gravita- tional mass is discussed and a certain condition which must be experimentally satis¯ed is given. The inertial force proposed by Sciama, in a simple case, is derived from the Assis' inertia the- ory based in the introduction of a Weber type force. The origin of the inertial force is totally justi¯ed taking into account that the Weber force is, in fact, an approximation of a simple retarded potential, see [18, 19]. The way how the inertial forces are also derived from some solutions of the general relativistic equations is presented. We wonder if the theory of inertia of Assis is included in the framework of the General Relativity. In the context of the inertia developed in the present paper we establish the relation between the constant acceleration a0, that appears in the classical Modi¯ed Newtonian Dynamics (M0ND) theory, with the Hubble constant H0, i.e. a0 ¼ cH0. 1. Inertial mass and gravitational mass The gravitational mass mg is the responsible of the gravitational force. This fact implies that two bodies are mutually attracted and, hence mg appears in the Newton's universal gravitation law m M F = G g g r: r3 According to Newton, inertia is an inherent property of matter which is independent of any other thing in the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra Light Axionic Dark Matter: Galactic Halos and Implications for Observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays
    galaxies Article Ultra Light Axionic Dark Matter: Galactic Halos and Implications for Observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays Ivan de Martino 1,* ID , Tom Broadhurst 1,2, S.-H. Henry Tye 3, Tzihong Chiueh 4, Hsi-Yu Schive 5 and Ruth Lazkoz 1 1 Department of Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, E-48080 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] (T.B.); [email protected] (R.L.) 2 Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, E-48011 Bilbao, Spain 3 Institute for Advanced Study and Department of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] 4 National Center for Theoretical Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] 5 National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 November 2017; Accepted: 8 January 2018; Published: 16 January 2018 Abstract: The cold dark matter (CDM) paradigm successfully explains the cosmic structure over an enormous span of redshifts. However, it fails when probing the innermost regions of dark matter halos and the properties of the Milky Way’s dwarf galaxy satellites. Moreover, the lack of experimental detection of Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) favors alternative candidates such as light axionic dark matter that naturally arise in string theory. Cosmological N-body simulations have shown that axionic dark matter forms a solitonic core of size of '150 pc in the innermost region of the galactic halos. The oscillating scalar field associated to the axionic dark matter halo produces an oscillating gravitational potential that induces a time dilation of the pulse arrival time of −22 '400 ns/(mB/10 eV) for pulsar within such a solitonic core.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1906.00969V2 [Hep-Ph] 2 Sep 2019
    FTUAM-19-11; IFT-UAM/CSIC-19-74 Very Light Asymmetric Dark Matter Gonzalo Alonso-Alvarez´ 1, Julia Gehrlein2;3, Joerg Jaeckel1 and Sebastian Schenk1 1Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atHeidelberg, Philosophenweg 16, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2Instituto de F´ısica Te´orica UAM/CSIC, Calle Nicol´as Cabrera 13-15, Cantoblanco E-28049 Madrid, Spain 3Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica, Universidad Aut´onomade Madrid, Cantoblanco E-28049 Madrid, Spain Abstract Very light dark matter is usually taken to consist of uncharged bosons such as axion-like particles or dark photons. Here, we consider the prospect of very light, possibly even sub- eV dark matter carrying a net charge that is (approximately) conserved. By making use of the Affleck-Dine mechanism for its production, we show that a sizable fraction of the energy density can be stored in the asymmetric component. We furthermore argue that there exist regions of parameter space where the energy density contained in symmetric particle-antiparticle pairs without net charge can to some degree be depleted by considering couplings to additional fields. Finally, we make an initial foray into the phenomenology of this scenario by considering the possibility that dark matter is coupled to the visible sector via the Higgs portal. arXiv:1906.00969v2 [hep-ph] 2 Sep 2019 1 1 Introduction Very light bosons such as axion(-like) particles or dark photons are increasingly popular dark matter candidates (see, e.g., [1,2] for reviews). Currently, a significant and growing experimental community is set to hunt down these very weakly interacting particles [1,3{17].
    [Show full text]
  • Newtonian Particles
    Newtonian Particles Steve Rotenberg CSE291: Physics Simulation UCSD Spring 2019 CSE291: Physics Simulation • Instructor: Steve Rotenberg ([email protected]) • Lecture: EBU3 4140 (TTh 5:00 – 6:20pm) • Office: EBU3 2210 (TTh 3:50– 4:50pm) • TA: Mridul Kavidayal ([email protected]) • Web page: https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp19/cse291-d/index.html CSE291: Physics Simulation • Focus will be on physics of motion (dynamics) • Main subjects: – Solid mechanics (deformable bodies & fracture) – Fluid dynamics – Rigid body dynamics • Additional topics: – Vehicle dynamics – Galactic dynamics – Molecular modeling Programming Project • There will a single programming project over the quarter • You can choose one of the following options – Fracture modeling – Particle based fluids – Rigid body dynamics • Or you can suggest your own idea, but talk to me first • The project will involve implementing the physics, some level of collision detection and optimization, some level of visualization, and some level of user interaction • You can work on your own or in a group of two • You also have to do a presentation for the final and demo it live or show some rendered video • I will provide more details on the web page Grading • There will be two pop quizzes, each worth 5% of the total grade • For the project, you will have to demonstrate your current progress at two different times in the quarter (roughly 1/3 and 2/3 through). These will each be worth 10% of the total grade • The final presentation is worth 10% • The remaining 60% is for the content of the project itself Course Outline 1. Newtonian Particles 10.Poisson Equations 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    J. Astrophys. Astr. (December 2017) 38:59 © Indian Academy of Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-017-9479-0 Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) as a Modification of Newtonian Inertia MOHAMMED ALZAIN Department of Physics, Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman, Sudan. E-mail: [email protected] MS received 2 February 2017; accepted 14 July 2017; published online 31 October 2017 Abstract. We present a modified inertia formulation of Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) without retaining Galilean invariance. Assuming that the existence of a universal upper bound, predicted by MOND, to the acceleration produced by a dark halo is equivalent to a violation of the hypothesis of locality (which states that an accelerated observer is pointwise inertial), we demonstrate that Milgrom’s law is invariant under a new space–time coordinate transformation. In light of the new coordinate symmetry, we address the deficiency of MOND in resolving the mass discrepancy problem in clusters of galaxies. Keywords. Dark matter—modified dynamics—Lorentz invariance 1. Introduction the upper bound is inferred by writing the excess (halo) acceleration as a function of the MOND acceleration, The modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) paradigm g (g) = g − g = g − gμ(g/a ). (2) posits that the observations attributed to the presence D N 0 of dark matter can be explained and empirically uni- It seems from the behavior of the interpolating function fied as a modification of Newtonian dynamics when the as dictated by Milgrom’s formula (Brada & Milgrom gravitational acceleration falls below a constant value 1999) that the acceleration equation (2) is universally −10 −2 of a0 10 ms .
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Particle Trajectories‡
    1 Variational approach to a theory of CLASSICAL PARTICLE TRAJECTORIES ‡ Introduction. The problem central to the classical mechanics of a particle is usually construed to be to discover the function x(t) that describes—relative to an inertial Cartesian reference frame—the positions assumed by the particle at successive times t. This is the problem addressed by Newton, according to whom our analytical task is to discover the solution of the differential equation d2x(t) m = F (x(t)) dt2 that conforms to prescribed initial data x(0) = x0, x˙ (0) = v0. Here I explore an alternative approach to the same physical problem, which we cleave into two parts: we look first for the trajectory traced by the particle, and then—as a separate exercise—for its rate of progress along that trajectory. The discussion will cast new light on (among other things) an important but frequently misinterpreted variational principle, and upon a curious relationship between the “motion of particles” and the “motion of photons”—the one being, when you think about it, hardly more abstract than the other. ‡ The following material is based upon notes from a Reed College Physics Seminar “Geometrical Mechanics: Remarks commemorative of Heinrich Hertz” that was presented February . 2 Classical trajectories 1. “Transit time” in 1-dimensional mechanics. To describe (relative to an inertial frame) the 1-dimensional motion of a mass point m we were taught by Newton to write mx¨ = F (x) − d If F (x) is “conservative” F (x)= dx U(x) (which in the 1-dimensional case is automatic) then, by a familiar line of argument, ≡ 1 2 ˙ E 2 mx˙ + U(x) is conserved: E =0 Therefore the speed of the particle when at x can be described 2 − v(x)= m E U(x) (1) and is determined (see the Figure 1) by the “local depth E − U(x) of the potential lake.” Several useful conclusions are immediate.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Aquinas on the Separability of Accidents and Dietrich of Freiberg’S Critique
    Thomas Aquinas on the Separability of Accidents and Dietrich of Freiberg’s Critique David Roderick McPike Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Philosophy Department of Philosophy Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © David Roderick McPike, Ottawa, Canada, 2015 Abstract The opening chapter briefly introduces the Catholic doctrine of the Eucharist and the history of its appropriation into the systematic rational discourse of philosophy, as culminating in Thomas Aquinas’ account of transubstantiation with its metaphysical elaboration of the separability of accidents from their subject (a substance), so as to exist (supernaturally) without a subject. Chapter Two expounds St. Thomas’ account of the separability of accidents from their subject. It shows that Thomas presents a consistent rational articulation of his position throughout his works on the subject. Chapter Three expounds Dietrich of Freiberg’s rejection of Thomas’ view, examining in detail his treatise De accidentibus, which is expressly dedicated to demonstrating the utter impossibility of separate accidents. Especially in light of Kurt Flasch’s influential analysis of this work, which praises Dietrich for his superior level of ‘methodological consciousness,’ this chapter aims to be painstaking in its exposition and to comprehensively present Dietrich’s own views just as we find them, before taking up the task of critically assessing Dietrich’s position. Chapter Four critically analyses the competing doctrinal positions expounded in the preceding two chapters. It analyses the various elements of Dietrich’s case against Thomas and attempts to pinpoint wherein Thomas and Dietrich agree and wherein they part ways.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLES and ABSTRACTS First Name: Andrea Surname: Addazi
    TITLES AND ABSTRACTS First Name: Andrea Surname: Addazi Affiliation: Fudan University (Shanghai) Quantum Vacuum & Quantum black holes: two aspects of the same question ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quantum vacuum and Quantum black holes may be considered as two aspects of the same problem. First of all, we will show how virtual black hole pairs provide a planckian contribution to the vacuum energy which screens the contribution coming from Standard Model vacuum energy. Second, we will move on the possible relation of dark energy and (Anti)evaporation instabilities in the framework of f(R)-gravity, In this case, a model for cosmology may provide insightful intuitions on the black hole thermodynamics and the information paradox. First Name: Imanol Surname: Albarran Affiliation: Universidade da Beira Interior The quantum realm of the "Little Sibling" of the Big Rip singularity ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We analyse the quantum behaviour of the Little Sibling of the Big Rip singularity (LSBR). The quantisation is carried within the geometrodynamical approach given by the Wheeler- DeWitt(WDW)equation. The classical model is based on a Friedmann-Lemaître- Robertson-Walker Universe filled by a perfect fluid that can be mapped to a scalar field with phantom character. We analyse the WDW equation in two setups. In the fi rst step, we consider the scale factor as the single degree of freedom, which from a classical perspective parametrises both the geometry and the matter content given by the perfect fluid. We then solve the WDW equation within a WKB approximation, for two factor ordering choices. On the second approach, we consider the WD equation with two degrees of freedom: the scale factor and a scalar fi eld.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review
    Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review Riccardo Scarpa European Southern Observatory, Chile E-mail [email protected] Abstract. By the time, in 1937, the Swiss astronomer Zwicky measured the velocity dispersion of the Coma cluster of galaxies, astronomers somehow got acquainted with the idea that the universe is filled by some kind of dark matter. After almost a century of investigations, we have learned two things about dark matter, (i) it has to be non-baryonic -- that is, made of something new that interact with normal matter only by gravitation-- and, (ii) that its effects are observed in -8 -2 stellar systems when and only when their internal acceleration of gravity falls below a fix value a0=1.2×10 cm s . Being completely decoupled dark and normal matter can mix in any ratio to form the objects we see in the universe, and indeed observations show the relative content of dark matter to vary dramatically from object to object. This is in open contrast with point (ii). In fact, there is no reason why normal and dark matter should conspire to mix in just the right way for the mass discrepancy to appear always below a fixed acceleration. This systematic, more than anything else, tells us we might be facing a failure of the law of gravity in the weak field limit rather then the effects of dark matter. Thus, in an attempt to avoid the need for dark matter many modifications of the law of gravity have been proposed in the past decades. The most successful – and the only one that survived observational tests -- is the Modified Newtonian Dynamics.
    [Show full text]