DOCSLIB.ORG

European Union Election Observation Mission to Liberia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Union Election Observation Mission to Liberia EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION TO LIBERIA Peaceful and orderly election marks an important step forward in the process of returning Liberia to a normal functioning state STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Monrovia, 13 October 2005 The European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) has been present in Liberia since 9 September 2005, following an invitation from the National Elections Commission (NEC). The Mission is led by Chief Observer Mr. Max van den Berg from the Netherlands, Member of the European Parliament and Vice-Chairman of its Development Committee. In total, the EU EOM deployed over 60 observers throughout Liberia to assess the whole electoral process in the light of international standards for democratic elections. Among these observers was a delegation of four members of the European Parliament led by Marie Arlette Carlotti MEP, which support the mission’s conclusions. The EU EOM is currently observing the result tabulation and announcement process, and will remain in country to observe all aspects of the election process, including a possible second round. Preliminary Conclusions • The 11 October 2005 presidential and parliamentary elections have so far been peaceful and generally well administered, marking an important step forward in the process of returning Liberia to a normal functioning state. Voters were provided with a wide range of political contestants, and in contrast to the elections of 1997 were able to cast their ballots free from fear. • The EU EOM recognises the effort and commitment demonstrated by the public, the National Elections Commission (NEC) and its 19,000 election officials, as well as political parties, their representatives and civil society, whose contributions helped to ensure the integrity of the process on election day. The presence of the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) helped to create a feeling of confidence and security among the voters. • During election day, voters turned out in large numbers, in a calm and orderly manner. Polling procedures were largely well followed and the secrecy of the vote was generally well maintained. Party and candidate representatives were present in virtually all polling stations visited by EU observers, often in large numbers. • The impact of poverty and illiteracy caused by fourteen years of war was visible during the process, particularly on election day when many voters had difficulties understanding voting instructions and ballot papers. However, election officials and voters worked together, mostly in a correct manner, to overcome the problems that this caused. 1 • Fundamental freedoms of expression, assembly and association were respected. Political parties and candidates were able to campaign actively in a conducive atmosphere in which no serious acts of violence or intimidation were reported. • The legislative framework provides for the conduct of democratic elections. However, a number of issues need to be addressed in advance of future elections including the removal of constitutional provisions based on ethnicity that result in unacceptable disenfranchisement according to international standards, as all persons should be equal before the law. The complaints procedures should be amended now by the NEC to ensure equality of access to all stakeholders. • Voter registration was widely viewed by election stakeholders to have been conducted successfully with almost twice the number of voters registered to participate as during the previous elections. However, for future elections, refugees residing outside the country should have the right and possibility to register to vote. • The media operated in an environment that provided for freedom of expression. Radio was by far the most important source of information during the campaign period. During the period monitored, the state broadcaster Eternal Love Broadcasting Corporation (ELBC) provided coverage of almost all parties which was neutral in tone, although the time devoted to some varied considerably. • Civil society organisations played a significant role in election observation and the delivery of civic and voter education. While much of the civic and voter education was of a good quality, significant further efforts will be required in this area in the years ahead, particularly through primary education and anti-illiteracy campaigns. • Efforts to encourage women to register and vote in the election were successful. However, only 14 per cent of candidates were women, and only one political party achieved the 30 per cent benchmark stipulated by the NEC. Only a few parties made a specific effort to attract women voters. • In the coming weeks, it is essential that the election process is completed in a timely, efficient and transparent manner and for all political leaders and parties, both winners and losers, to work together in an inclusive democratic process for the better governance of Liberia. The final assessment of these elections will depend, in part, on the completion of counting and tabulation, the announcement of results by the NEC, and the complaints and appeals process. The EU EOM will remain in country to observe the remaining aspects of the election process, including, if necessary, a second round, and will publish a final report, containing detailed recommendations to improve the election process, within two months of the completion of the entire process. The EU EOM would like to thank the election and state authorities, candidates, political parties, security forces, media and civil society, UNMIL and especially the people of Liberia for the invaluable co-operation received throughout the deployment of the mission. 2 Preliminary Findings Background The 2005 elections in Liberia took place in the framework of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed in August 2003. Under the CPA, a National Transition Government of Liberia (NTGL) took office in October 2003, under the chairmanship of Mr. Guyde Bryant, with a mandate to prepare for “internationally supervised” presidential and parliamentary elections to be held not later than October 2005, and to bring the country back to a normally functioning state. Under a resolution adopted by the UN Security Council in September 2003, UNMIL was deployed to the country, with a stabilisation force of 15,000 peacekeepers. The 2005 elections were held to elect a President and Vice President as well as members of the Senate and House of Representatives. Under the electoral legislation, the President and Vice President are elected by an absolute majority (50 per cent plus one of the valid votes), if necessary through a second ballot between the two candidates receiving the most votes should this not be achieved in the fist round. Two Senators are elected for each of the 15 counties, based on a simple majority system, and Members of the House of Representatives are elected by a simple majority system in 64 election districts. Election Day Election day took place in a calm and orderly manner throughout the country. In contrast to the elections in 1997, voters were able to cast their ballots free from fear. No reports of violence, and only isolated reports of disturbances outside of polling places were received. In a positive development, which contributed to the transparency of the process, party and candidate representatives were present in virtually all polling stations visited, often in large numbers, and domestic observers were present in over 60 per cent of polling stations visited. As a result of many polling stations opening late and a slow start to the voting process, most voters initially had to queue for a number of hours to cast their ballots. However, election officials took sensible steps to address this problem and few polling stations ultimately had to remain open after the deadline for the close of polls. Officials in most polling stations visited explained the possibility for voters to vote twice in the Senatorial election. The NEC took a decision at 11:00 to stop applying voter instruction stickers to Senate ballot papers to speed up the processing of voters. However, that decision did not reach all levels o0f the election administration throughout the country. Polling procedures were largely well followed and the secrecy of the ballot was generally well maintained. While inking of voters was undertaken in all polling stations visited, voters were not always checked for ink in advance. The impact of poverty and illiteracy caused by fourteen years of war was visible during the process, however, election officials and voters worked together, mostly in a correct manner, to overcome the problems that this caused. However in some polling stations visited, in contravention of election provisions, election officials were seen assisting voters in casting their ballots, even when others who could have provided this assistance were present. Although the counting process was slow in most polling stations where counting was observed, election officials remained committed to completing their task. While procedures were generally well followed, reconciliation instructions were not always adhered to and inconsistencies in counting votes for the Senate election were observed in some polling stations, 3 with two votes being counted for the same candidate in some cases. In many polling stations observed, a relatively high number of invalid ballots, many of which were ballot papers without any mark on them were recorded. In over 50 per cent of polling stations in which counts were observed,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LIBERIA 11 – 15 September 2017 EISA Pre-Election Assessment Mission Report | Republic of Liberia 2017
    Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa EISA Pre-Election Assessment Mission Report REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA 11 – 15 September 2017 EISA Pre-Election Assessment Mission Report | Republic of Liberia 2017 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT OF THE 2017 PRESIDENTIAL 5 AND REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS 2.1. A history of bloody coups and civil wars 5 2.2. The first peaceful handover of power 6 2.3. A peaceful political context guided by ‘The Farmington River Declaration’ 8 3. ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK 9 3.1. The constitutional and legal framework 9 3.1.1. The 1986 Constitution 9 3.1.2. The New Elections Law (as amended) and Regulations 10 3.2. The electoral system 11 3.3. Party and campaign finance 12 3.4. Election management 13 4. KEY FINDINGS ON THE PRE-ELECTION PHASE 13 4.1. Constituency delimitation 13 4.2. Voter registration 16 4.3. Political party registration and candidate registration 17 4.4. The media 18 4.5. Civil society 19 4.6. Gender and minority rights 19 4.7. Civic and voter education 20 4.8. Security 20 4.9. Campaigns 21 4.10. Preparedness of the National Elections Commission (NEC) 21 APPENDICES 23 Appendix 1: Stakeholders consulted by the EISA PAM 23 Appendix 2: List of Registered Political Parties 23 2 EISA Pre-Election Assessment Mission Report | Republic of Liberia 2017 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CDC Congress for Democratic Change CSOs Civil Society Organisations ECC Election Coordinating Committee EISA Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa FRR Final
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Round 4 Questionnaire
    Afrobarometer ROUND 4 THE QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE IN LIBERIA Document revised: 11 November 2008 Respondent Number Fieldworker No. Data Entry Clerk No. Field Number: L I B L I B L I B [Office Use Only] [Allocated by Supervisor] [Supervisor Use Only] Household back-checked? Questionnaire checked by: PSU/EA: [Circle one] Yes 1 [Supervisor signature] Urban 1 No 2 Rural 2 [Interviewer: Select appropriate code for Region/Province. Write names for District and Town/Village and EA number in the boxes.] Region/Province District Bomi 380 Town/Village Bong 381 EA Number Gbarpolu 382 Grand Bassa 383 Grand Capemount 384 Grand Gedeh 385 Grand Kru 386 Lofa 387 Margibi 388 Maryland 389 Montserrado 390 Nimba 391 Rivercess 392 River Gee 393 Sinoe 394 THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ARE TO BE FILLED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FIELD SUPERVISOR EA-SVC. Are the following services present in the primary sampling unit / enumeration area? Can't Yes No determine A. Electricity grid that most houses could access 1 0 9 B. Piped water system that most houses could access 1 0 9 C. Sewage system that most houses could access 1 0 9 D. Cell phone service 1 0 9 EA-FAC. Are the following facilities available within the primary sampling unit / enumeration area, Can't Yes No or within easy walking distance? determine A. Post-office 1 0 9 B. School 1 0 9 C. Police Station 1 0 9 D. Health Clinic 1 0 9 E. Market stalls (selling groceries and/or clothing) 1 0 9 EA-SEC. In the PSU / EA, did you (or any of your colleagues) see: Yes No Don’t Know A.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Elections and Political Processes Program Evaluation Final
    LIBERIA LIBERIA ELECTIONS AND POLITICAL PROCESSES PROGRAM EVALUATION FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2008 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development by Democracy International, Inc. Prepared under the Democracy and Governance Analytical Services Indefinite Quantity Contract, #DFD-I-00-04-00229-00 Submitted to: USAID/Liberia Prepared by: Sue Nelson, Team Leader Terrence Lyons, Ph.D. Evan B. Smith Sekou W. Konneh Contractor: Democracy International, Inc. 4802 Montgomery Lane, Suite 200 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: 301-961-1660 www.democracyinternational.com LIBERIA ELECTIONS AND POLITICAL PROCESSES PROGRAM EVALUATION FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2008 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. i PART 1: BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................. 1 1. Political and Electoral Processes in Liberia ....................................................................................... 1 2. Donor Assistance ................................................................................................................................ 2 3. USAID’s Electoral and Political Processes Strengthening Program .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Codebook Round4 Afrobarometer Survey Liberia
    Data Codebook for a Round4 Afrobarometer Survey in Liberia Prepared by: Nicholas Kerr Michigan State University March 2010 The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) Michigan State University (MSU) 6 Spin Street, Church Square 14 West Airport Residential Area Department of Political Science Cape Town 8001, South Africa P.O. Box 404, Legon-Accra, Ghana East Lansing, Michigan 48824 27 21 461 2559•fax: 27 21 461 2589 233 21 776 142•fax: 233 21 763 028 517 353 3377•fax: 517 432 1091 Mattes ([email protected]) Gyimah-Boadi ([email protected]) Bratton ([email protected]) Copyright Afrobarometer _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Survey Technical Information The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Liberia Afrobarometer Round 4, 2008 Dates of Fieldwork: 9 to 31 December 2008 (with one additional EA added on 8 February 2009) Sample size: 1200 Sampling frame: The National Sampling Frame for the 2008 Population and Housing Census, constructed by Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services (LISGIS) Sample universe: Citizens age 18 years or older, excluding institutions Sample design : Nationally representative, random, clustered, stratified, multistage area probability sample Stratification: County and urban-rural location Stages: SSUs (Clans, rural areas only), PSUs (Enumeration Areas), start points, households and respondents SSU/PSU selection: Probability proportionate to population size (PPPS) Cluster size: Two PSUs per SSU (rural only), 8 households per PSU Household selection: Randomly selected start points, followed by walk pattern using 5/10 interval. Respondent selection: Gender quota filled by alternating interviews between men and women; respondents of appropriate gender listed, after which household member draws a numbered card to select an individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia 2005: an Unusual African Post-Conflict Election
    J. of Modern African Studies, 44, 3 (2006), pp. 375–395. f 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0022278X06001819 Printed in the United Kingdom Liberia 2005: an unusual African post-con£ict election David Harris* ABSTRACT The 2003 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the ensuing two-year- long National Transitional Government of Liberia (NTGL), which brought together two rebel forces, the former government and members of civil society, justifiably had many critics but also one positive and possibly redeeming feature. In spite of, or perhaps because of, the realpolitik nature of the CPA and the barely disguised gross corruption of the members of the coalition government, the protagonists in the second Liberian civil war (2000–03) complied with the agreement and the peace process held. The culmination of this sequence of events was the 11 October 2005 national elections, the 8 November presidential run-off and the 16 January 2006 inauguration. In several ways, this was the African post-conflict election that broke the mould, but not just in that a woman, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, won the presidential race, and a football star, George Weah, came second. The virtual absence of transformed rebel forces or an overbearing incumbent in the electoral races, partially as a result of the CPA and NTGL, gave these polls extraordinary features in an African setting. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND After fifteen years of post-Cold War post-conflict African elections, it can now be said that some patterns are emerging, except that Liberia appears to have upset one or two of these rhythms. In some ways, the 2005 Liberian polls emerged firmly against general African electoral precedents – including those of the 1997 Liberian election, which ushered in the rule of the former ‘warlord’, Charles Taylor (Harris 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report
    Institute for Security Studies Situation Report Date issued: 5 October 2010 Author: Lansana Gberie Distribution: General Contact: [email protected] Liberia: The 2011 elections and building peace in the fragile state1 Abstract Liberia holds its second post-war presidential and legislative elections in October 2011. The first, held in 2005, was a landmark: it was the first free and fair elections in the country’s long history (Liberia became a republic in 1847), and it ushered in Africa’s first elected female president. Since then Liberia, previously wracked by bloody petty wars, has been largely stable, though very fragile. The 2011 elections will probably be just as important as the one in 2005. Their successful conduct will determine when the UN, which still maintains about 8 000 troops in the country, will finally withdraw. No doubt, the outcome of the polls will also determine whether the country maintains the promising trajectory it has had since 2006. And success will be measured from both the conduct of the elections and the results of the polls: the polls will have to be conducted in a free and fair atmosphere for the results to be broadly acceptable; but who emerges as president will be just as important. The current president, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, has been progressive and reform-minded, and she commands wide support from donors and international investors: in less than a year of her election, Liberia’s image as a failed and almost criminal state exporting violence to its neighbours changed dramatically. Whatever the outcome of the elections, however, it is important that international players – primarily ECOWAS, AU and UN – maintain a steady focus on the three areas that the Liberian government has identified as critical to sustained peace building: security sector rebuilding, the administration of justice, and national reconciliation and healing.
    [Show full text]
  • US Covert and Overt Operations in Liberia, 1970S to 2003
    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 3rd Quarter 2014 US Covert and Overt Operations in Liberia, 1970s to 2003 NIELS HAHN, PHD* Introduction and Background ith support from the US Navy, the American Colonization Soci- ety founded Liberia as an American colony in 1822 with the in- tention of sending rebellious blacks who were formerly slaves “back to Africa.”1 To reduce the administration cost of the colony and limit the responsibility of the US government (USG), Liberia was granted independence in 1847.2 The constitution was written at Harvard University, and W 3 the flag adopted was similar to that of the United States but with only one star. Although Liberia had all of the outward features of an independent state, the American Colonization Society and the USG de facto governed it indirectly. As former research director and president of the US Foreign Policy Association Ray- mond Leslie Buell puts it, Liberia survived “through visits of United States war- ships to Liberian ports and through more urbane gestures, the United States has posted a keep-off-the-grass sign on Liberian soil.”4 Liberia became a foothold of the USG in Africa during European colonial- ism, a place from where it could project its interests into other parts of the conti- nent. In 1926 the Firestone Company established one of the world’s largest rub- ber plantations in Liberia as a response to the British rubber monopoly.5 In the following decades, the USG put in place a number of military facilities such as a deep-sea port, an airport, and numerous military bases and training camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Office, United Kingdom
    LIBERIA COUNTRY REPORT OCTOBER 2003 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE Home Office, United Kingdom Liberia October 2003 CONTENTS 1 Scope of the document 1.1 - 1.4 2 Geography 2.1 3 Economy 3.1 - 3.2 4 History 4.1 - 4.2 5 State Structures The Constitution 5.1 Citizenship 5.2 Political System 5.3 Judiciary 5.4 - 5.8 Legal Rights/Detention 5.9 - 5.10 Death Penalty 5.11 Internal Security 5.12 - 5.18 Border security and relations with neighbouring countries 5.19 - 5.20 Prison and Prison Conditions 5.21 - 5.23 Armed Forces 5.24 - 5.25 Military Service 5.26 Medical Services 5.27- 5.29 People with disabilities 5.30 - 5.31 Educational System 5.32 - 5.33 6 Human Rights 6a Human Rights issues Overview 6.1 - 6.2 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.3 - 6.9 Journalists 6.10 - 6.13 Freedom of Religion 6.14 - 6.17 Religious Groups 6.18 Freedom of Assembly and Association 6.19 - 6.20 Employment Rights 6.21 - 6.23 People Trafficking 6.24 Freedom of Movement 6.25 - 6.26 6.27 - 6.30 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) 6b Human rights – Specific Groups Ethnic Groups 6.31 - 6.33 Women 6.34 - 6.41 Children 6.42 - 6.45 Homosexuals 6.46 6c Human Rights – Other Issues United Nations 6.47 - 6.49 Humanitarian situation 6.50 - 6.54 Annex A: Chronology Annex B: Political Organisations Annex C: Prominent People Annex D: References to Source Material Liberia October 2003 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Access Tool PA-X
    Peace Agreement Access Tool PA-X www.peaceagreements.org Country/entity Liberia Region Africa (excl MENA) Agreement name Peace Agreement between the Government of Liberia, the Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD), the Movement of Democracy in Liberia (MODEL) and the Political Parties (Accra Agreement) Date 18/08/2003 Agreement status Multiparty signed/agreed Interim arrangement Yes Agreement/conflict level Intrastate/intrastate conflict ( Liberian Civil Wars (1989 - 1997) (1999 - 2005) ) Stage Framework/substantive - comprehensive (Agreement) Conflict nature Government Peace process 69: Liberia peace process Parties FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA (GOL) FOR LIBERIANS UNITED FOR RECONCILIATION & DEMOCRACY (LURD) FOR THE MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRACY IN LIBERIA (MODEL) FOR NATIONAL PATRIOTIC PARTY FOR UNITY PARTY FOR LIBERIAN PEOPLE'S PARTY FOR NATIONAL REFORMATION PARTY FOR LABOR PARTY FOR LIBERIA UNIFICATION PARTY FOR LIBERIAN ACTION PARTY FOR PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR FREE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR REFORMATION ALLIANCE PARTY FOR ALL-LIBERIAN COALITION PARTY FOR TRUE WHIG PARTY FOR UNITED PEOPLE'S PARTY FOR LIBERIA NATIONAL UNION FOR EQUAL RIGHTS PARTY FOR PROGRESSIVE PEOPLES PARTY FOR NEW DEAL MOVEMENT Third parties AS WITNESSES: FOR INTER-RELIGIOUS COUNCIL FOR LIBERIA (IRCL) FOR THE MANO RIVER WOMEN PEACE NETWORK (MARWOPNET) FOR LIBERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION FOR LIBERIANS IN DIASPORA FOR LIBERIA LEADERSHIP FORUM FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN LIBERIA THE MEDIATOR FOR UNITED NATIONS FOR ECOWAS FOR THE AFRICAN UNION FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION, CO-CHAIR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONTACT GROUP ON LIBERIA FOR THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA, CO-CHAIR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONTACT GROUP ON LIBERIA Description A comprehensive peace agreement between the Government of Liberia, LURD, and MODEL which Page 1 of 5 builds on the Accra Agreement of June 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia 2011.Pdf
    EISA gratefully acknowledges the generous financial support for this project from the Department for International Development (DFID) EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT LIBERIA THE 23 AUGUST 2011 REFERENDUM THE 11 OCTOBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL, SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS THE 8 NOVEMBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL RUN-OFF ELECTION Order from: [email protected] EISA ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT No 44 EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT i EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT THE 23 AUGUST 2011 REFERENDUM THE 11 OCTOBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL, SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS THE 8 NOVEMBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL RUN-OFF ELECTION LIBERIA ii EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT iii EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT THE 23 AUGUST 2011 REFERENDUM THE 11 OCTOBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL, SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS THE 8 NOVEMBER 2011 PRESIDENTIAL RUN-OFF ELECTION LIBERIA 2012 iv EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM AND ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION REPORT Published by EISA 14 Park Rd, Richmond Johannesburg South Africa P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 381 6000 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 978-1-920446-42-0 © EISA 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2012 EISA strives for excellence in the promotion of credible elections, participatory democracy, human rights culture, and the strengthening of governance institutions for the consolidation of democracy in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia: the 2011 Elections and Building Peace in the Fragile State1
    Institute for Security Studies Situation Report Date issued: 5 October 2010 Author: Lansana Gberie Distribution: General Contact: [email protected] Liberia: The 2011 elections and building peace in the fragile state1 Abstract Liberia holds its second post-war presidential and legislative elections in October 2011. The first, held in 2005, was a landmark: it was the first free and fair elections in the country’s long history (Liberia became a republic in 1847), and it ushered in Africa’s first elected female president. Since then Liberia, previously wracked by bloody petty wars, has been largely stable, though very fragile. The 2011 elections will probably be just as important as the one in 2005. Their successful conduct will determine when the UN, which still maintains about 8 000 troops in the country, will finally withdraw. No doubt, the outcome of the polls will also determine whether the country maintains the promising trajectory it has had since 2006. And success will be measured from both the conduct of the elections and the results of the polls: the polls will have to be conducted in a free and fair atmosphere for the results to be broadly acceptable; but who emerges as president will be just as important. The current president, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, has been progressive and reform-minded, and she commands wide support from donors and international investors: in less than a year of her election, Liberia’s image as a failed and almost criminal state exporting violence to its neighbours changed dramatically. Whatever the outcome of the elections, however, it is important that international players – primarily ECOWAS, AU and UN – maintain a steady focus on the three areas that the Liberian government has identified as critical to sustained peace building: security sector rebuilding, the administration of justice, and national reconciliation and healing.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Access Tool PA-X
    Peace Agreement Access Tool PA-X www.peaceagreements.org Country/entity Liberia Region Africa (excl MENA) Agreement name Peace Agreement between the Government of Liberia, the Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD), the Movement of Democracy in Liberia (MODEL) and the Political Parties (Accra Agreement) Date 18/08/2003 Agreement status Multiparty signed/agreed Agreement/conflict Intrastate/intrastate conflict (Liberian Civil Wars (1989 - 1997) (1999 - 2005)) level Stage Framework/substantive - comprehensive (Agreement) Conflict nature Government Parties FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA (GOL) FOR LIBERIANS UNITED FOR RECONCILIATION & DEMOCRACY (LURD) FOR THE MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRACY IN LIBERIA (MODEL) FOR NATIONAL PATRIOTIC PARTY FOR UNITY PARTY FOR LIBERIAN PEOPLE'S PARTY FOR NATIONAL REFORMATION PARTY FOR LABOR PARTY FOR LIBERIA UNIFICATION PARTY FOR LIBERIAN ACTION PARTY FOR PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR FREE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR REFORMATION ALLIANCE PARTY FOR ALL-LIBERIAN COALITION PARTY FOR TRUE WHIG PARTY FOR UNITED PEOPLE'S PARTY FOR LIBERIA NATIONAL UNION FOR EQUAL RIGHTS PARTY FOR PROGRESSIVE PEOPLES PARTY FOR NEW DEAL MOVEMENT Third parties AS WITNESSES: FOR INTER-RELIGIOUS COUNCIL FOR LIBERIA (IRCL) FOR THE MANO RIVER WOMEN PEACE NETWORK (MARWOPNET) FOR LIBERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION FOR LIBERIANS IN DIASPORA FOR LIBERIA LEADERSHIP FORUM FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN LIBERIA THE MEDIATOR FOR UNITED NATIONS FOR ECOWAS FOR THE AFRICAN UNION FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION, CO-CHAIR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONTACT GROUP ON LIBERIA FOR THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA, CO-CHAIR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONTACT GROUP ON LIBERIA Description A comprehensive peace agreement between the Government of Liberia, LURD, and MODEL which builds on the Accra Agreement of June 2003.
    [Show full text]