An Environmental History of Oldenburg Point

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Environmental History of Oldenburg Point An Environmental History of Oldenburg Point Joe Malkovich History 460 Professor Cronon November 28, 2005 Few children from small towns in northern Minnesota grow up without a potent sense of place, and I am no exception. I grew up loving the land. In one of my seminal adolescent memories, my sixteen-year-old self perches on the swinging bridge over the St. Louis River in Jay Cooke State Park. It is early spring—April, probably, as thick slabs of ice still grip the shore—and seething currents of frigid snowmelt surge beneath me. The waters, tea-stained with tannins seeping from the extensive thawing wetlands to the north, rush toward the river’s mouth at Lake Superior. There they will wait hundreds of years before continuing their journey to the Atlantic. A spring snow flurry swirls about me, and as I look beyond the jutting rocks and roaring falls into the thick forest of hardwoods, spruce, and pine, I can palpably sense the ancient Canadian Shield emerging beneath my feet and expanding far into the north. In my mind, this swathe of rugged land and dynamic water in southeast Carlton County seems to embody completely the wild nature of northern Minnesota. In fact, Jay Cooke State Park lies near several transitions that characterize the regional environment. The gradational boundary between deciduous and coniferous forests passes through central Minnesota a short distance to the south. Likewise, just to the south sedimentary rocks disappear from the surface and more ancient igneous and metamorphic rocks are exposed to the north. The park also is located near important hydrologic divides. The St. Louis River, which empties into Lake Superior, drains the westernmost watershed in the Great Lakes basin. Yet rain falling twenty miles west or south of Jay Cooke flows down the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico. And to the north, precipitation enters the extensive system of glacial lakes and juvenile streams at the southern edge of the Hudson Bay watershed. In my formative experience on the swinging bridge, I remember feeling fascinated by the park’s physiography. I still am. But that is not why I love the land. I love Jay Cooke State Park because I have gone there every year of my life with people I love. So perhaps I should say I grew up loving the environment’s function rather than the landscape’s simple existence. Over time my perceptions of the ostensibly inhuman environment have become suffused with human emotional significance, so that meaning imbued in the park’s landscape stems from the important role it has played in my life. I cannot remember a time when I did not know the park, and as I have grown my conception of its physical landscape and the meanings I have ascribed to it have changed. Several park facilities and trails have been locales for family outings since before my birth. Other trails are hiking routes, ski areas, and places to run. The woods, streams, and rocks functioned as science classrooms. Pools in the St. Louis were swimming holes in summers during my adolescence. The swinging bridge area is a hangout spot, a romantic getaway, a 1 place for meditation. Finally, the park in its entirety will always be a fascinating place to go exploring. Yet, in a sense, only one idea underlies all my disparate uses of the park: Jay Cooke is a place I go “to be in nature.” Regardless of the specific activities humans engage in there, it is the appeal of wild nature in the park that draws more than 220,000 visitors each year.1 But Jay Cooke State Park is not a place to experience wilderness. The land is preserved due to its aesthetic value and the dramatic power displayed by the St. Louis River. But it is not wild in the sense of a pristine land unsullied by human activities. Rather, the park is clearly a place modified for a specific human use—recreation. Yet modern alterations to facilitate leisure activities only comprise the topmost layer of human writing on the park’s palimpsest landscape, and traces of the area’s diverse land-use history remain etched upon the earth. Many of these vestiges converge at one location within the park. So it is there, at Oldenburg Point, that I will interpret historic human activities and attempt to convey a more holistic understanding of the land. When one enters Oldenburg Point’s packed gravel parking lot, neatly bordered with trapezoidal concrete barriers, a splash of lush meadow opens to the north. Orderly rows of white spruce trees flank the thick lawn of hardy introduced grasses and white clover, and numerous pellets of dry and decaying dung testify that this prime grazing habitat does not go unnoticed by the park’s abundant deer population. In fact, the whitetail deer that frequent this forest edge seldom respond to—let alone flee from—the sights and sounds of thousands of automobiles that come to Oldenburg Point each year. The deer have no need to flee. Park regulations proscribe hunting, and ranger-led wildlife viewing excursions encourage deer to regard humans as innocuous spectators. And the deer are apt performers. Indeed, a grazing whitetail gracefully framed against the dense forest composes a beautiful picture. But should that deer unknowingly stray beyond park boundaries during November, its conditioned quiescence might spell its demise. A deer’s transformation from hair-trigger wariness to placid complacence symbolizes a dramatic human ecological transformation. The deer of Jay Cooke State Park are living documents that attest to the remarkable transformation of human activities in the lands now encapsulated within the park’s boundaries. Once, Ojibwa people would have hunted whitetail here to provide critical calories in their diets. Yet obtaining meat was far more than a purely materialistic venture. The hunt also had sacred ramifications. Every creature’s welfare depended on its manitou, a powerful guiding supernatural spirit. Therefore, a hunter entreated the manitou of a deer to permit a successful hunt, expressing the need for food and acknowledging the solemn responsibility involved in taking life. Basil Johnson writes that after the kill a hunter “offered tobacco in 2 thanksgiving to the manitou of the victim and…to Kitchi-Manitou, the Master of Life, for sanctioning the taking of life.”2 Deer and humans were thus bound in a sacred cycle of gift giving. To view a deer in this place is not simply to see a biological entity, but it is to see in stark relief how modern humans’ desire to extract profit from the land eventually eradicated a lifestyle and culture dependent on nature’s largess for material subsistence and spiritual well-being. A short walk from the trailhead at the Oldenburg Point parking lot quickly leads to the renowned Grand Portage of the St. Louis, a transportation route that played a key role in Indians’ way of life, and in irrevocably altering that way of life. Hikers setting out from Oldenburg Point to walk the portion of this trail preserved within the park may stroll along unaware of the historical significance of their path. But the Grand Portage Trail’s physical characteristics reveal its history. Most park trails are wide, grassy tracks kept passable by periodic mowing. Actual footpaths generally do not appear in these tracks, but utility vehicle tire scarring sometimes is evident. In contrast, the narrow Grand Portage Trail stretches through the forest as a packed dirt footpath, which needs no mowing to remain travelable. Where maintenance vehicles have devegetated a wide area, the old trail shows up as a thin strip of entrenched clay down the middle of the impacted area. Many thousands of human footfalls over hundreds of years are preserved there in the packed, barren earth. Although local historian John Fritzen writes that the seven-mile route around the unnavigable dalles of the St. Louis River was “a difficult trail with steep hills to climb and wet swamps…to wade through,” it had been a major Indian thoroughfare for hundreds of years at the time of first contact with Europeans in the late seventeenth century. The St. Louis connected the open waters of Lake Superior with the interior of Minnesota and regions beyond, and for this reason the Ojibwa called it “‘Kitchigumizibi’ or Lake Superior River.” The watershed’s proximity to two major continental divides meant that the river could serve as a highway for early peoples to travel to and from the Hudson Bay drainage via the Pike River Portage, or the vast Mississippi River network via the Savanna Portage or the Prairie Portage.3 Indians traveling to or from villages near the mouth of the St. Louis would have passed Oldenburg Point on their way to trade or to harvest foods like wild rice. In the winter these settlements broke into small family units that dispersed across the landscape, each managing its own hunting territory to insure some success for each family. The first running of sugar maple sap in the spring marked the end of winter’s solitude, as it summoned several small families to a traditionally shared grove to make sugar, thus initiating the movement back to communal village life in the summer.4 These groups moved over the Grand Portage past Oldenburg Point during their seasonal migrations, and the abundant sugar maples 3 and deer at Oldenburg Point suggest that some Ojibwa could have occupied this place and utilized its resources for winter and spring subsistence. During migrations, gender dictated how families moved over the Grand Portage. Women took a different route than their male relatives, disembarking at the Women’s Portage farther downstream and joining the main trail after several miles.
Recommended publications
  • Some Dam – Hydro Newstm
    6/01/2012 Some Dam – Hydro News TM And Other Stuff i Quote of Note: “Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." --Theodore Roosevelt “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: Castoro Cellars Cabernet Sauvignon “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson DDamsams: (If you missed it last week on PBS, you could drive to a local theater.) DAMMING ‘BIG MUDDY’ Documentary about Fort Peck Dam construction comes to public television May 25, 2012, billingsgazette.com • By Jaci Webb Telling the story in one hour of the herculean effort it took to redirect the longest river in the U.S. and construct the Fort Peck Dam was a challenge for filmmaker Scott Sterling. The result, the Montana PBS documentary “Fort Peck Dam,” brings all the elements of this fascinating story together with interviews with folks who were there. “Fort Peck Dam” will be shown free at 7 p.m. 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu June 14 at the Babcock Theatre; June 15 at 7 p.m. at the Custer County Art & Heritage Center in Miles City; and at 7 p.m. June 23 at the Fort Peck Theater in Fort Peck. Sterling said he worked hard to make the film a story about the people, not just the project initiated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to create jobs during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Ten days after Roosevelt signed the order for the project, workers started showing up in Fort Peck.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Victoria's Renewable Energy Resources
    Chapter 2: Victoria’s renewable energy resources Introduction Despite wide recognition of the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions, particularly in relation to the energy sector, renewable energy accounts for only a small percentage of Victoria’s energy production. The installed capacity of operating renewable energy projects by source is set out in figure 2.1. Hydroelectric power makes up the largest percentage – 56 per cent followed by wind (34 per cent), biomass (8 per cent) and geothermal (1.3 per cent).Total electricity installed capacity (the maximum rate at which power can be produced) in Victoria in 2008 was 9,290 megawatts.6 The renewable energy capacity component was approximately 1,151 megawatts.7 Figure 2.1 Renewable energy – installed capacity of operating projects in Victoria (as at 22 October 2009) Tidal: 0.15MW, 0% Biomass: 110.1MW, 8.1% Geothermal: 18.15MW, 1.3% Wind: 458.4MW, 33.7% Solar: 13.3MW, 1% Hydro: 760.1MW, 55.9% Source: Sustainability Victoria, personal communication, 22 October 2009 6 Victorian Government, submission no.21, p.3 7 Victorian Government, submission no.21, p.3 5 Inquiry into the Approvals Process for Renewable Energy Projects in Victoria Although the capacity represents approximately 10 per cent of total electricity, the amount of renewable energy actually produced ranges between 2 and 4 per cent. 8 Renewable energy production is currently at 1.8 per cent due to the falling water levels in hydroelectric dams. As Ms Marianne Lourey, Executive Director of Energy Sector Development, Department of Primary Industries explained to the Committee: The big issue with the numbers [percentage of renewable energy] at the moment is the drought.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Louis Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
    z c St. Louis River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report March 2013 Authors The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is Chad R. Anderson, Scott Niemela, Jesse Anderson, reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Stacia Grayson, Bruce Monson, Dave Internet to distribute reports and information to Christopherson, Ben Lundeen, Jeff Jasperson, wider audience. Visit our website for more Mike Kennedy, Kris Parson, and information. Mike Kelly MPCA reports are printed on 100 percent post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured Contributors without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Citizen Lake Monitoring Program volunteers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Natural Resources Research Institute Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws3-04010201b Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 II. The Watershed Monitoring Approach ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019
    Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan Including Recommended Actions for Climate Change Adaptation 2019 Department of Public Safety Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Approved: March 11, 2019 Adopted: March 18, 2019 CONTENTS CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................................... iii FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................................ ix TABLES .......................................................................................................................................................................... xi Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Hazard Mitigation Definition ............................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Climate Change Adaptation Definition ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overseas Study Tour for Senior Management (Optional) - Cost Not Included in the Fee Proposal Task 15.1- Purpose of the Study Tour (TECH-3)
    For further details, please contact Ray Bilbow in SMEC Cooma Office 1. Task 15: Overseas Study Tour for Senior Management (Optional) - Cost not included in the Fee Proposal Task 15.1- Purpose of the Study Tour (TECH-3) The purpose of the “Overseas Study Tour of Senior Managers / Engineers” is to expose to managerial level experts in developed countries such as Australia, USA, UK etc. Under “Transfer of Technology (ToT)” for senior managers and engineers, SMEC has successfully conducted “Study Tours” for its Clients in various countries, including; • China • Vietnam • Indonesia • Thailand • Malaysia • India • Kenya • Mongolia • Tajikistan • Kyrgyzstan • Sri Lanka • Afghanistan • Nigeria • Ethiopia • Mozambique • Botswana “Study Tours” conducted so far comprised of “class room Power Point Presentations”, field visits to major hydropower and dam projects, and some sight-seeing visits. For further details, please contact Ray Bilbow in SMEC Cooma Office Task 15.2 - Dams to be visited in Victoria, Australia (TECH-3) Examples of a few reservoirs and dams located in Victoria, Australia that could be included in the itinerary of the “Proposed Study Tour” are given below. • Thomson Reservoir and Dam. • Cardinia Reservoir and Dam. • Upper Yarra Reservoir and Dam. • Glenmaggie Reservoir and Dam. • Lake Bellfield and Dam. Thomson Reservoir and Dam, Victoria, Australia1 - Thomson Reservoir is the largest of Melbourne’s reservoirs. It has a capacity of 1,068 billion litres, and makes up about 60% of Melbourne's total storage capacity. Thomson supplies Silvan Reservoir (via Upper Yarra Reservoir), which distributes water throughout the Melbourne metropolitan area. The dam at the reservoir is an earth and rockfill embankment.
    [Show full text]
  • Energizernews
    SUMMER 2014 43 students receive over $100,000 in scholarships The Minnesota Power Twenty-three New Generation several other scholarships EnergizerNews Foundation awarded 43 Scholarships were awarded to students attending the scholarships totaling $100,000 to students who will graduate University of Minnesota-Duluth, to regional high school and in fields that align with our Itasca Community College, college students this spring. region’s workforce needs. University of Wisconsin- Twenty high school students Students pursuing a bachelor’s Superior, St. Olaf College and MP rededicates, celebrates received $2,500 Community degree received $2,500 and the University of St. Thomas. Involvement scholarships those pursuing an associate’s In the past 17 years, more than renewable hydropower degree received $1,000. in recognition of their 750 students have received “Hometown Hydropower” takes center stage this dedication in giving back to the A list of the recipients can educational funding totaling summer as Minnesota Power celebrates its hydro communities where they live be found at mnpower.com/ more than $1.2 million through system and showcases its investment in renewable as well as their good academic company/scholarships. the Foundation’s scholarship hydroelectricity. record. program. The Foundation also awarded Historic Thomson Hydro Station, the heart of the system, sustained major damage when floodwaters Options to purchase ALLETE stock Blue Angels headline air show raced down the St. Louis River in 2012. Now, as the station prepares to return to generation, Minnesota The option of purchasing ALLETE stock through Minnesota Power is a Power is rededicating to public service its entire your monthly Minnesota Power or Superior Water, sponsor of the 2014 Duluth hydroelectric system.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN St. Louis County, Minnesota
    2013 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN St. Louis County, Minnesota Sheriff’s Office - Emergency Operations St. Louis County 1 2013 Hazard Mitigation Plan PREFACE The purpose of the St. Louis County Hazard Mitigation plan is to determine how to reduce or eliminate the loss of life and property damage resulting from natural and human-caused hazards. The plan was first adopted in 2005 and was reviewed and updated in 2012 in preparation for approval by FEMA in 2012. The plan encompasses all natural, technological, and human-caused hazards rather than only focusing on one type of hazard. For the planning process, St. Louis County followed the guidelines and handbooks that FEMA has created and any resources provided by HSEM. The hazard planning process included several steps which were undertaken simultaneously, these included: Identifying and organizing interested members of the community as well as the technical expertise required for the planning process; identifying the characteristics and potential consequences of hazards; determining our priorities; and looking at possible ways to avoid or minimize the undesired effects (mitigation projects). St. Louis County will continue to utilize the plan by implementing specific mitigation projects or changing day-to-day operations within the local government. It will also be important to conduct periodic evaluations and make revisions to the plan as needed. The plan resides with the St. Louis County Sheriff’s Department, who is responsible for maintenance and updates. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: St. Louis County would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to the St. Louis County Hazard Mitigation Plan. Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Dave Aspie…Minnesota Power Hazard Mitigation Guidance and Input RC.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Louis River Estuary Master Plan
    ST. LOUIS RIVER ESTUARY NATIONAL WATER TRAIL MASTER PLAN DULUTH, MINNESOTA & SUPERIOR, WISCONSIN Approved by Duluth City Council March 27, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Leadership Team: City of Duluth, MN City of Superior, WI St. Louis County, MN Douglas County, WI Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Land Trust St. Louis River Alliance Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Duluth Visitors Bureau: ‘Visit Duluth’ The Chamber and Visitors Bureau – Superior, Douglas County Area National Park Service – Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program Consultant Team: Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.hkgi.com Arimond Consultants, LLC 1925 Sharon St. La Crosse, WI 54603 For More Information Contact: Lisa Luokkala City of Duluth Parks and Recreation Division 218.730.4312 [email protected] Up river of Chambers Grove Park 2 ST. LOUIS RIVER ESTUARY NATIONAL WATER TRAIL MASTER PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Key Stakeholders: On-going Project Outreach Partners for The Duluth Experience Continued Coordination Day Tripper of Duluth US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Positive Energy Outdoors US Fish and Wildlife Service Northland Paddlers Alliance US Army Corps of Engineers Spirit Lake Marina & RV US Coast Guard The Ski Hut US Geological Service Duluth Sail and Power Squadron National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Twin Ports Walleye Association National Weather Service (NWS) University of Minnesota Duluth - Recreational Sports Outdoor
    [Show full text]