Black Currency of Middle Ages and Case for Complementary Currency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Currency of Middle Ages and Case for Complementary Currency Journal of Risk and Financial Management Article Black Currency of Middle Ages and Case for Complementary Currency Pezhwak Kokabian Department of Economics, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA; [email protected] Received: 16 March 2020; Accepted: 2 June 2020; Published: 3 June 2020 Abstract: Monetary historians argue that two types of currencies were circulating in the middle ages of Europe. The first was the standard historical form of money made up of gold and silver coins, and the second was a set of small pieces of copper and other metallic substances used mainly in towns and townships for local trade as currency. Jetton and tokens are monetized objects that are not official currencies; they were of lower quality of the inferior metallic object, which were used for day-to-day transaction needs. The drive for local monetary decentralization is pointed to build up fiscal autonomy and responsible local monetary institutions. This paper reasons that the monetary regime of the Renaissance was a real and genuine trimetallic currency regime. Keywords: the second currency; complementary currency; middle ages currency; counter-cyclicality; barter 1. Introduction There are several narratives of the historical origins of currency. The majority of economists make a factual error when they equate the origin of money with the history and origins of coinage (Innes 1913), whether we acknowledge that economic history has been eliminated from the curriculums of the majority of western economic departments programs. While the history of currency and coinage may overlap in some periods in the history of humankind, even then, it is a historical fact that money predates coin minting by more than 3000 years. Graeber(2012) argues that money’s emergence from some hypothetical market exchange based on barter relationships has no ground. He argues that money originated as an accounting system for keeping the record of debt. It seems to be an overlooked subject when the coinage system of the pre-gold standard is studied, for which more study and research is expected. The studies that cover medieval and premodern financial institutions recognize that, prior to the establishment and dissemination of the gold standard, as florin was introduced in A.D. 1252, following a period of almost 500 years in which the coinage of Western Europe had been predominantly silver, Europe experienced an efficient, well organized monetary system and a surprising variety of currencies within several assemblies of communities. In many occurrences, the local towns and religious authorities practiced monetary autonomy and issued their currency and coin. 2. Trimetallic Standard of Pre-Renaissance The history of town coinage can be traced back to the early antiquity of towns and cities. The Italian city-state of Florence issued the first recorded city-backed bond. These bonds were endorsed through the legislation of 1344 and 1345. This debt was called the Monte Commune. Monte in Italian means both mountains and funds. In addition to the localized financial structures of cities, the citizens of J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 114; doi:10.3390/jrfm13060114 www.mdpi.com/journal/jrfm J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 114 2 of 9 J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 10 diverse communities used parallel and multiple metallic means of payment for daily transaction needs. CoinsThe and history tokens of lowerthe United value metalStates, were Napoleonic among daily France trade and and medieval commerce Europe activities. all suggest the existenceThe historyof three of kinds the United of currency States,,Napoleonic which the most France inexpensive and medieval type Europe of currency all suggest was theto play existence as a facilitatorof three kinds of micro of currency,-level trade which and the transactions most inexpensive in isolated type towns of currency and localities was to. play In medieval as a facilitator Europe, of themicro-level currency trade of andthe transactionshigh rate of in circulation isolated towns called and black localities. currency In medieval, and in Europe, parallel, the there currency were of depreciatedthe high rate metallic of circulation coins calledof (up blackto 98%) currency, silver coin. and in parallel, there were depreciated metallic coins of (upTo to mention 98%) silver only coin. its main characteristics, it was a system based on a standard reference unit used to createTo mention two different only its types main of characteristics, currencies: a it standard was a system currency based made on a standardup of gold reference and silver unit coins used (acceptableto create two for di distantfferent trade), types and of currencies: a set of small a standardpieces of copper currency and made other upmetallic of gold substance and silver, referred coins (acceptableto as black forcurrency distant, used trade), mainly and a setin towns of small and pieces townships of copper for and local other trade metallic as currency. substance, They referred were usuallyto as black classified currency, into used four mainly groups in towns of coins, and townshipsméreau (plural for local méreaux), trade as tokens currency. (jetton), They wereand usuallyofficial currencyclassified ( intoprimarily four groupsfor tax purposes) of coins, m. é reau (plural méreaux), tokens (jetton), and official currency (primarilySince these for tax currencies purposes). were made of lower value metal and they would become rusted, they bear the labelSince of these black currencies money. In were the pre made-Napoleon of lower era, value a specific metal and term they applied. would The become term rusted,“mereau they” refers bear tothe kinds label of blackvouchers money. and Intoken the pre-Napoleonthat were used era, as asigns specific of verification term applied., such The as term pass “mereau” or a substitute refers currencyto kinds ofduring vouchers periods and of token monetary that were shortage. used asThe signs mereaux of verification, had a shape such close as pass to tokens or a substitute or coins: theycurrency were duringmostly periodsmade of ofcheaper monetary metal shortage. slices on Thewhich mereaux symbols had were a shapeinscribed close. The to name tokens “mereau or coins:” comesthey were from mostly the Latin made “merere of cheaper” which metal means slices “ onto be which worthy, symbols to deserve were inscribed.” (Kennedy The et nameal. 2012) “mereau”. In the Middlecomes from Ages the, they Latin were “merere” referred which to as means “merel, “to merelle, be worthy, marelles to deserve” and mereaulx (Kennedy”. etMereau al. 2012 predates). In the tokenMiddle, and Ages, it theyseems were to serve referred more to as divine “merel, and merelle, religious marelles purposes; and mereaulx”. in reality, Mereauthe church predates prohibited token, usingand it the seems currency to serve for more an extended divine and period. religious Mereaux purposes; and intokens reality, we there monetized church prohibited objects that using we there notcurrency certified for ancurrencies, extended but period. they ar Mereauxose to be and used tokens for accounting were monetized and measurement objects thatwere purposes not certified during historycurrencies,. but they arose to be used for accounting and measurement purposes during history. As depicted in Figure 11,, twotwo didifferentfferent currencies were used for didifferentfferent socialsocial purposes (Anonymous 1987) 1987, ),as asvarious various authorities authorities were were responsible responsible for issuance for issuance,, authorization authorization,, and legality and judlegalitygment judgment.. (a) (b) Figure 1 1.. DifferenceDifference between between token token and andcurrency currency in France in France;; (a) two (a-)denier two-denier mereau mereau coined coinedby the cathedralby the cathedral chapter; and chapter; (b) a Jacques and (b )Hurault a Jacques de Cheverny Hurault coin de, Cheverny treasurer of coin, France treasurer. (Source: of Méreaux France. (Source:2008). M éreaux 2008). In the fifteenthfifteenth century, mereauxmereaux werewere createdcreated withwith anan equivalentequivalent weightweight value.value. Therefore, it could be convert converteded into a common currency. Due to the inferior value of the metallic substance, they usually were not subject to be taxed. AbbeysAbbeys,, chapters, andand monasteriesmonasteries usedused themthemfrom from the the thirteenth thirteenth century century ( Courtenay(Courtenay 19721972));; they were used as a token of attendance by the canons (priest) at the offices offices and cathedral chapters to g giveive them the right to a mealmeal oror aa portionportion ofof bread.bread. Since issued by religious authorities,authorities, they could not bear interest; they mostly represent a mereau (jeton) and a certificate for the voluntary work done for churches. Méreaux issued by a religious and charter community could then circulate all around the J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, x; doi: FOR PEER REVIEW www.mdpi.com/journal/jrfm J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 114 3 of 9 bear interest; they mostly represent a mereau (jeton) and a certificate for the voluntary work done for churches. Méreaux issued by a religious and charter community could then circulate all around the township like other coins in circulation. The record of mereaux is mostly documented in French sources; there are limited references in the English historical records. These coins exhibit local circulation and have rarely been recorded being used and circulated
Recommended publications
  • Is the International Role of the Dollar Changing?
    Is the International Role of the Dollar Changing? Linda S. Goldberg Recently the U.S. dollar’s preeminence as an international currency has been questioned. The emergence of the euro, changes www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues ✦ in the dollar’s value, and the fi nancial market crisis have, in the view of many commentators, posed a signifi cant challenge to the currency’s long-standing position in world markets. However, a study of the dollar across critical areas of international trade January 2010 ✦ and fi nance suggests that the dollar has retained its standing in key roles. While changes in the global status of the dollar are possible, factors such as inertia in currency use, the large size and relative stability of the U.S. economy, and the dollar pricing of oil and other commodities will help perpetuate the dollar’s role as the dominant medium for international transactions. Volume 16, Number 1 Volume y many measures, the U.S. dollar is the most important currency in the world. IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE It plays a central role in international trade and fi nance as both a store of value Band a medium of exchange. Many countries have adopted an exchange rate regime that anchors the value of their home currency to that of the dollar. Dollar holdings fi gure prominently in offi cial foreign exchange (FX) reserves—the foreign currency deposits and bonds maintained by monetary authorities and governments. And in international trade, the dollar is widely used for invoicing and settling import and export transactions around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy in a World of Cryptocurrencies∗
    Monetary Policy in a World of Cryptocurrencies Pierpaolo Benigno University of Bern March 17, 2021 Abstract Can currency competition affect central banks’control of interest rates and prices? Yes, it can. In a two-currency world with competing cash (material or digital), the growth rate of the cryptocurrency sets an upper bound on the nominal interest rate and the attainable inflation rate, if the government cur- rency is to retain its role as medium of exchange. In any case, the government has full control of the inflation rate. With an interest-bearing digital currency, equilibria in which government currency loses medium-of-exchange property are ruled out. This benefit comes at the cost of relinquishing control over the inflation rate. I am grateful to Giorgio Primiceri for useful comments, Marco Bassetto for insightful discussion at the NBER Monetary Economics Meeting and Roger Meservey for professional editing. In recent years cryptocurrencies have attracted the attention of consumers, media and policymakers.1 Cryptocurrencies are digital currencies, not physically minted. Monetary history offers other examples of uncoined money. For centuries, since Charlemagne, an “imaginary” money existed but served only as unit of account and never as, unlike today’s cryptocurrencies, medium of exchange.2 Nor is the coexistence of multiple currencies within the borders of the same nation a recent phe- nomenon. Medieval Europe was characterized by the presence of multiple media of exchange of different metallic content.3 More recently, some nations contended with dollarization or eurization.4 However, the landscape in which digital currencies are now emerging is quite peculiar: they have appeared within nations dominated by a single fiat currency just as central banks have succeeded in controlling the value of their currencies and taming inflation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Bimetallism
    Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department A Model of Bimetallism François R. Velde and Warren E. Weber Working Paper 588 August 1998 ABSTRACT Bimetallism has been the subject of considerable debate: Was it a viable monetary system? Was it a de- sirable system? In our model, the (exogenous and stochastic) amount of each metal can be split between monetary uses to satisfy a cash-in-advance constraint, and nonmonetary uses in which the stock of un- coined metal yields utility. The ratio of the monies in the cash-in-advance constraint is endogenous. Bi- metallism is feasible: we find a continuum of steady states (in the certainty case) indexed by the constant exchange rate of the monies; we also prove existence for a range of fixed exchange rates in the stochastic version. Bimetallism does not appear desirable on a welfare basis: among steady states, we prove that welfare under monometallism is higher than under any bimetallic equilibrium. We compute welfare and the variance of the price level under a variety of regimes (bimetallism, monometallism with and without trade money) and find that bimetallism can significantly stabilize the price level, depending on the covari- ance between the shocks to the supplies of metals. Keywords: bimetallism, monometallism, double standard, commodity money *Velde, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Weber, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and University of Minne- sota. We thank without implicating Marc Flandreau, Ed Green, Angela Redish, and Tom Sargent. The views ex- pressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Fed- eral Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, or the Federal Reserve System.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Currency in Circulation Forecasting for Monetary Policy Purposes: the Case of Poland
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Koziński, Witold; Świst, Tomasz Article Short-term currency in circulation forecasting for monetary policy purposes: The case of Poland e-Finanse: Financial Internet Quarterly Provided in Cooperation with: University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszów Suggested Citation: Koziński, Witold; Świst, Tomasz (2015) : Short-term currency in circulation forecasting for monetary policy purposes: The case of Poland, e-Finanse: Financial Internet Quarterly, ISSN 1734-039X, University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszów, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 65-75, http://dx.doi.org/10.14636/1734-039X_11_1_007 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/147121 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Complementary Currencies: Mutual Credit Currency Systems and the Challenge of Globalization
    Complementary Currencies: Mutual Credit Currency Systems and the Challenge of Globalization Clare Lascelles1 Abstract Complementary currencies—currencies operating alongside the official currency—have taken many forms throughout the last century or so. While their existence has a rich history, complementary currencies are increasingly viewed as anachronistic in a world where the forces of globalization promote further integration between economies and societies. Even so, towns across the globe have recently witnessed the introduction of complementary currencies in their region, which connotes a renewed emphasis on local identity. This paper explores the rationale behind the modern-day adoption of complementary currencies in a globalized system. I. Introduction Coined money has two sides: heads and tails. ‘Heads’ represents the state authority that issued the coin, while ‘tails’ displays the value of the coin as a medium of exchange. This duality—the “product of social organization both from the top down (‘states’) and from the bottom up (‘markets’)”—reveals the coin as “both a token of authority and a commodity with a price” (Hart, 1986). Yet, even as side ‘heads’ reminds us of the central authority that underwrote the coin, currency can exist outside state control. Indeed, as globalization exerts pressure toward financial integration, complementary currencies—currencies existing alongside the official currency—have become common in small towns and regions. This paper examines the rationale behind complementary currencies, with a focus on mutual credit currency, and concludes that the modern-day adoption of complementary currencies can be attributed to the depersonalizing force of globalization. II. Literature Review Money is certainly not a topic unstudied.
    [Show full text]
  • [ 543 ] V.—The Case for Bimetallism. by Joseph John Murphy. THE
    1891.] [ 543 ] V.—The Case for Bimetallism. By Joseph John Murphy. [Read Tuesday, 14th April, 1891.] THE question which this essay is an attempt to answer, may be thus expressed :—What would be the effect on prices, and on the financial and industrial interests of the world in general, if the leading nations of the world were to agree to make both gold and silver unlimited legal tender at the ratio of value between the two that prevailed during the seventy years which closed with 1873 >— namely, 15-5- ozs. silver as in France, or 16 ozs. as in the United States, equal to one oz. of gold ;—at the same time opening their mints to the unlimited and gratuitous coinage of both metals 1 The statistical data used in the present attempt to answer this question, are taken from the " Final Report of the Royal Com- mission, appointed to enquire into the recent changes in the relative values of the precious metals, 1888." The reply to such a question must of necessity be somewhat in- definite. The laws of political economy are laws of tendency only, though they are mathematical in their certainty, and almost mathe- matical in their nature; yet, as in many branches of physical science, we can predict the general character and the direction of the effects of given causes, but not their magnitude. In a word, their cer- tainty does not ensure precision. Before endeavouring to reply to this question, much preliminary exposition will be required. We do not, however, propose to begin at the very beginning of the theory of money.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Return of Private Currencies Could Mean for Central Banks by Susan E
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY | JUNE 30, 2021 Déjà Vu All Over Again: What the Return of Private Currencies Could Mean for Central Banks By Susan E. Zubradt and Jesse Leigh Maniff Private digital currencies, or “crypto-assets,” have surged in popularity recently, but they are not new to the payments landscape and may present familiar challenges for central banks. Although they have yet to fulfill the main functions of money, crypto-assets still have the potential to affect financial stability and the implementation of monetary policy. The recent revival of private digital currencies has captured the imagination of those who envision a world where value can be transferred as seamlessly as information. Many individuals across a range of industries, from government to payments to finance, wonder whether private digital currencies may somehow sideline fiat money—the government-issued money that, coupled with reserves at central bank accounts, underpins the global financial system. In this article, we review the history of private currencies, reevaluate whether present private digital currencies satisfy the functions of money, and discuss the implications that “crypto-assets”—whether considered money or not—may have for monetary policy and financial stability. Historical Perspective Private currencies based on commodities have existed for millennia. Since around the sixth century B.C.E, commodity money has been the predominate monetary system (Velde 1998). Metal coins were a useful early means of payment to facilitate everyday transactions. Over time, paper currency, issued by a private entity and backed by a commodity such as gold, became the norm for money in circulation.
    [Show full text]
  • LOW-CARBON CURRENCIES: the POTENTIAL of TIME BANKING and LOCAL MONEY SYSTEMS for COMMUNITY CARBON-REDUCTION by Gill Seyfang C
    LOW-CARBON CURRENCIES: THE POTENTIAL OF TIME BANKING AND LOCAL MONEY SYSTEMS FOR COMMUNITY CARBON-REDUCTION by Gill Seyfang CSERGE Working Paper EDM 09-04 1 LOW-CARBON CURRENCIES: THE POTENTIAL OF TIME BANKING AND LOCAL MONEY SYSTEMS FOR COMMUNITY CARBON-REDUCTION Gill Seyfang CSERGE, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia [email protected] ISSN 0967-8875 2 ABSTRACT The challenge of achieving low-carbon communities cannot be underestimated. While government policies set ambitious targets for carbon-reduction over the next 40 years, there remains an urgent need for tools and initiatives to deliver these reductions through behaviour-change among individuals, households and communities. This chapter sets out a ‘New Economics’ agenda for sustainable consumption which addresses the need for low- carbon communities. It then applies these criteria in a critical examination of complementary currencies in the UK (time banking and local money). These are alternative mechanisms for exchanging goods and services within a community, which do not use money, and which aim instead to build local economic resilience and social capital. The potential of these initiatives as carbon-reduction tools has not previously been considered. Time banking appears to offer the greatest potential for carbon-reduction through offering a supportive social network which meets some of the participants’ social and psychological needs for recognition, esteem and belongingness – needs which might otherwise be met through material consumption. In contrast, local money systems aim to strengthen and build resilience in local economies, and their principal impact on consumption is through localisation and import-substitution – which brings carbon-reductions from avoiding transport costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Money of Wörgl & Complementary Currencies
    Summer School for Alternative Economic and Monetary Systems Free Money of Wörgl & Complementary Currencies Vienna, July 24th, 2015 Speaker: Heinz Hafner & Veronika Spielbichler Unterguggenberger Institute, Wörgl is a registered non-profit society, founded in 2003 for the documentation and public education on the WWII free money experiment in Wörgl as well as for contemporary research on complementary currencies nowadays. The Unterguggenberger Institute initiated the „LA21 youth project I-MOTION“ in 2004. The society is a founding member of the initiative „Neues Geld in Österreich 2007“ and addressed a petition onto the Austrian Parliament in 2008. unterguggenberger.org archiv.unterguggenberger.org neuesgeld.com Money for the Freedom of Creation • PART I ~15min impuls from the past Free Money of Wörgl („Wörgler Freigeld“) an historic show case • PART II ~15min impuls from the present complementary currencies today options & experiments (flattering & colourful) • PART III ~60min impuls for the future an interactive approach to currency design classification sheet drafting PART #1 – impuls from the past The monetary experiment in Wörgl – Wörgls Free Money a short outline on a historic show case Initial situation: the historic economic situation in the region of Wörgl The driver: Mayor Michael Unterguggenberger – his life Prearrangements of the Free Money experiment: - foundation of the Free Economic Group of Wörgl - political decisions within the municipality Realization: creation of a demurrage voucher, which represented the worth of labour time – monthly charge in the form of stamps that needed to be bought and sticked onto the voucher – construction programme – facilitation of consumption – fostering municipal taxes – creation of an infinite cycle After life of the experiment: Imitations and copycats in Austria, international attention by the media Between 1900 and 1930 the small town of Wörgl Develops as an industrial and commercial center due to its convenient location mainly based on the railway infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ontology of Money and Other Economic Phenomena. Dan
    Economic Reality: The Ontology of Money and Other Economic Phenomena. Dan Fitzpatrick PhD Thesis Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method London School of Economics. 1 UMI Number: U198904 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U198904 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TH f , s*’- ^ h %U.Oi+. <9 Librw<V Brittsn utxwy Oi HouUco. J and Eoonowc Science m >Tiir I Abstract The contemporary academic disciplines of Philosophy and Economics by and large do not concern themselves with questions pertaining to the ontology of economic reality; by economic reality I mean the kinds of economic phenomena that people encounter on a daily basis, the central ones being economic transactions, money, prices, goods and services. Economic phenomena also include other aspects of economic reality such as economic agents, (including corporations, individual producers and consumers), commodity markets, banks, investments, jobs and production. My investigation of the ontology of economic phenomena begins with a critical examination of the accounts of theorists and philosophers from the past, including Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Marx, Simmel and Menger.
    [Show full text]
  • IJCCR 2015 Rosa Stodder
    International Journal of Community Currency Research VOLUME 19 (2015) SECTION D 114-127 ON VELOCITY IN SEVERAL COMPLEMENTARY CURRENCIES Josep Lluis De La Rosa* And James Stodder** *TECNIO Centre EASY, University Of Girona, Catalonia ** Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA ABSTRACT We analyse the velocity of several complementary currencies, notably the WIR, RES, Chiem- gauer, Sol, Berkshares dollars, and several other cases. Then we describe the diversity in their velocity of circulation, and seek potential explanations for these differences. For example, WIR velocity is 2.6 while RES velocity is 1.9 despite being similar currencies. The higher speed may be explained by WIR blended loans among other beneIits or by the fact that there are nearly 20.000 unregistered members that contribute with their transactions. Using a comparative method between cases, the article explores a number of possible explanations on the increases in velocity, apart from prevailing demurrage approaches ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank the several reviewers of this paper, especially Andreu Honzawa of the STRO foundation. This research is partly funded by the TIN2013-48040-R (QWAVES) Nuevos méto- dos de automatización de la búsqueda social basados en waves de preguntas, the IPT20120482430000 (MIDPOINT) Nuevos enfoques de preservación digital con mejor gestión de costes que garantizan su sostenibilidad, and VISUAL AD Uso de la Red Social para Monetizar el Contenido Visual, RTC-2014-2566-7 and GEPID GamiIicación en la Preservación Digital de- splegada sobre las Redes Sociales, RTC-2014-2576-7, the EU DURAFILE num. 605356, FP7- SME-2013, BSG-SME (Research for SMEs) Innovative Digital Preservation using Social Search in Agent Environments, as well as the AGAUR 2012 FI_B00927 awarded to José Antonio Olvera and the Grup de recerca consolidat CSI-ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Kaldor
    PROFILES OF WORLD ECONOMISTS 26 NICHOLAS KALDOR NICHOLAS KALDOR – ONE OF THE FIRST CRITICS OF MONETARISM doc. Ing. Ján Iša, DrSc. Known in economic circles as one of the thought in several fields, but it was his work founders of Post-Keynesianism, Nicholas on the theory of distribution and economic Kaldor (1908–1986) ranks among the worl- growth that stirred the greatest reaction. d's foremost economists of the second half Less well-known, however, is Kaldor's con- of the 20th century. Kaldor contributed to tribution to monetary theory, which has long the development of modern economic been standing quietly in the background. Nicholas Kaldor was born in Budapest on 12 May 1908. rous Third World countries, as well as an advisor to central His father was a lawyer and his mother came from wealthy banks and to the United Nations Economic Commission for business family. Although his father had wanted him to Latin America. Most significant, however, was his role as an study law, Kaldor opted for economics. He began his studi- advisor to Labour finance ministers from 1964 to 1968 and es at the University of Berlin in 1925 and then after two 1974 to 1976. After completing his two-year mission in years moved to the London School of Economics (LSE), Geneva in 1949, Kaldor began to work at Cambridge Uni- from which he graduated in 1930. He remained at the LSE versity and became, as John Maynard Keynes had been, a as lecturer until 1947, during which time his colleagues inc- fellow of King's College, Cambridge.
    [Show full text]