DOCSLIB.ORG

Yellowstone Fisheries Aquatic Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yellowstone Fisheries Aquatic Sciences Yellowstone Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences Annual Report 2008 Geode Creek, a tributary of the Yellowstone River, is home to an Amphibian surveys on Yellowstone’s Northern Range focused on the introduced population of genetically unaltered westslope cutthroat trout. Blacktail Deer and Elk creek drainages. ellowstone National Park is home to the most to their inability to compete with aggressive, non-native ecologically and economically important inland trout. In addition, in many park waters the infusion of non- Y cutthroat trout fisheries remaining in North America. native-trout genetic material into stream-resident cutthroat However, threats to these native trout have, over the past populations by interbreeding among species has occurred decade, irreversibly altered and made future sustainability of and cannot easily be reversed. The loss to the cutthroat this thriving and diverse ecosystem uncertain. Science has populations is permanent, and any recovery will be achieved helped to develop our understanding of the consequences only through direct intervention. The recent rainbow of status-quo management. In fact, without swift and trout invasion of the upper Slough Creek meadows, and continuing action, negative effects on the native trout the resulting loss of that world-renowned fishery’s genetic populations of Yellowstone—keystone energy sources for integrity, is an example of how serious this problem is. numerous mammal and bird species, and a recreational focus The stakes are high, raising the bar for innovative for visitors—have the potential to produce impacts that will management and fundraising. The increased magnitude of reverberate throughout the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. the problems faced by the park’s fisheries, and the accelerated For instance, each predatory, non-native lake trout—a rate at which they are occurring, are straining Yellowstone’s species illegally introduced to Yellowstone Lake at least 20 resources. Despite this, our hope and enthusiasm remain years ago but not discovered until 1994—can annually high. Within Yellowstone Lake, cutthroat are showing consume at least 41 cutthroat trout each year. Lake subtle signs of recovery, while lake trout are showing signs of trout have the potential to decimate the Yellowstone suppression. Within the streams, momentum could not be Lake cutthroat trout population in our lifetime without greater as we continue our first cutthroat restoration project heightened and maintained management efforts. Lake and the replication of newly discovered, pure-strain westslope trout are not an acceptable substitute for cutthroat trout cutthroat trout populations. in the ecosystem because they occupy an ecological niche This annual report describes historic and continuing unavailable to cutthroat-eating predators, threatening the park aquatics programs with data and information obtained many species, such as grizzly bears, bald eagles, and river through 2008. In several instances, the report also outlines otters, which depend on cutthroat trout for survival. our vision for the program, with specific project goals and Albeit much more quietly, the brook, brown, and objectives for future years. This was done in an attempt to rainbow trout intentionally stocked by managers during the ensure program transparency; we want to make sure that park’s early history have also taken their toll on cutthroat everyone with an interest has a solid understanding of both trout populations across Yellowstone. The native westslope our intent and the direction our efforts are taking to preserve cutthroat trout of the Madison River, for example, a specialist and restore native fishes in the waters of this tremendous species requiring pristine habitats, have been eliminated due park. Yellowstone Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences Annual Report 2008 DA u ats i M M © Mi Yellowstone cutthroat trout Todd M. Koel, Jeffrey L. Arnold, Patricia E. Bigelow, Philip D. Doepke, Brian D. Ertel, and Michael E. Ruhl National Park Service Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2010-03 Suggested citation: Koel, T. M., J. L. Arnold, P. E. Bigelow, P. D. Doepke, B. D. Ertel, and M. E. Ruhl. 2010. Yellowstone Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences: Annual Report, 2008. National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-2010-03. Title page art courtesy Mimi Matsuda. Front cover captions (left to right): Fisheries technician Brian Ertel with a spawning Yellowstone cutthroat trout at Clear Creek, a tributary to Yellowstone Lake (photo by Alexis Wolf). Fisheries technician Derek Rupert at the fish barrier on East Fork Specimen Creek (photo by Todd Koel). National Park Service fisheries technician Stuart Brown and Student Conservation Association volunteer Nick Bankston with record-sized lake trout caught from gillnets set on Yellowstone Lake (photo by Pat Bigelow). Back cover captions (left to right): Fisheries technician Becky Adams prepares to dock the gillnetting boat, NPS Hammerhead (photo by Todd Koel). Aquatic ecologist Jeff Arnold and crew sample water at High Lake (photo by Joseph Skorupski). Montana Conservation Corps crew assisted in building a fish barrier in East Fork Specimen Creek (photo by Todd Koel). Background: Moonlight on Yellowstone Lake (NPS photo by J. Schmidt, 1977). Opposite page: Fisheries technician Joe Skorupski samples Yellowstone Lake. Note: Native fishes shown out of water were not injured. Contents Background.................................................... 2 Aquatic.Ecology........................................... 23 Summary........................................................... 4 Core.Water.Quality.Parameters.................. 24 The.Fisheries.Program................................... 6 Chemical.Constituents.of.Surface.Waters... 25 Primary.Emphasis.Areas............................... 6 Regulatory.Monitoring.on.Soda.Butte.. Yellowstone.Cutthroat.Trout......................... 7 Creek.and.Reese.Creek........................ 26 Long-term.Monitoring................................. 7 Yellowstone.Lake.Limnology...................... 26 Preservation.of.Yellowstone.Lake. Macroinvertebrates.Surveys........................ 27 Cutthroat.Trout...................................... 7 Amphibian.Surveys.................................... 27 Lake.Trout.Suppression.Program................ 10 Trends.from.Volunteer.Angler.Reports....... 29 Lake.Trout.Control.Netting........................ 10 Angling.in.the.Park..................................... 29 Lake.Trout.Spawner.Removal..................... 11 Madison.River.Fishery.Survey.................... 30 Lake.Trout.Fecundity................................. 12 Seventh.Year.of.Fly.Fishing.Volunteers....... 33 Incidental.Catch.of.Cutthroat.Trout........... 12 Long-term.Volunteer.Assistance................. 33 Science.Panel.Review/Recommendations.... 12 Educational.Programs................................. 33 Stream.Resident.Cutthroat.Trout.and. Collaborative.Research............................... 33 Grayling.Conservation........................... 14 Public.Involvement...................................... 33 Westslope.Cutthroat.Trout.Source. Projects.by.Graduate.Students.................... 34 Populations.......................................... 14 Interagency.Workgroups............................. 34 High.Lake.Westslope.Cutthroat.Trout. Cutthroat.Trout.Broodstock.Development.34 Introduction........................................ 14 Acknowledgements...................................... 35 East.Fork.Specimen.Creek.Fish.Barrier....... 15 Literature.Cited.......................................... 36 East.Fork.Specimen.Creek.Piscicide. Appendices..................................................... 39 Treatment............................................ 17 i..Fish.Species.List...................................... 39 Potential.of.Returning.Arctic.Grayling.to. ii..The.Waters.of.Yellowstone...................... 39 Grayling.Creek.................................... 18 iii..Genetic.Analysis–Yellowstone.. Recent.and.On-going.Invasions.on.the. cutthroat.trout..................................... 40 Northern.Range................................... 18 iv..Genetic.Analysis–Westslope.. Soda.Butte.Creek.Brook.Trout.Removal..... 20 cutthroat.trout..................................... 41 Genetic.Analyses.of.Fluvial.Cutthroat. v..Seasonal.Staff.......................................... 42 Trout.Populations................................ 22 vi..Long-term.Volunteers............................ 42 Long-term.Water.Quality.Monitoring........ 23 Background YELL–34659 hen Yellowstone National Park was established in 1872, it was the Wonly wildland under active federal management. Early visitors fished and hunted for subsistence, as there were almost no visitor services. Fishes were viewed as resources to be used by sport anglers and provide park visitors with fresh meals. Fish-eating wildlife, such as bears, ospreys, otters, and pelicans, were regarded as a nuisance, and many were destroyed as a result (Varley and Schullery 1998). Mammoth Hot Springs Hotel bellmen display their catch To supplement fishing and counteract of brown trout next to a“Tally-Ho” stagecoach, circa 1910. “destructive” consumption by wildlife, a fish “planting” program was established. Early park superintendents noted the vast fishless waters of Largely because of these activities and the the park and asked the u.S. Fish Commission popularity of Yellowstone’s fisheries, recreational to “see that all waters are stocked so
Load more

Recommended publications
  • V- 447 in STORAGE PROGRESS REPORI' of COYOTE S'iuijy !Iifjyellowstone NATIONAL PARK
    c 1 l <­ V- 447 IN STORAGE PROGRESS REPORI' OF COYOTE S'IUIJY !IifJYELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK by Adolph Murie ;r.3!3 I In a letter dated March 25, 1937, the Regional Officer, Region 2, was requested by the Director to assign me to make a thorough study of the coyote and its relationships to other wildlife species in Yellowstone National Park. In compliance with this request I reached Yellowstone May 1 to begin field studies of the coyote and other species on which it preys. Although it has not been possible to devote all of my time to this study I feel that it has not suffered greatly as a result of other special assignments given me and that fairly good continuity in observations has been ma intained. Special assign­ ments kept me away from Yellatqstone for various periods as follows:- Wind River Mountain investigation, July 26 - August l; i9'lathead .lforest investigation, August 8 - 22; Shoshone ..l!'orest trip, September 6 - 14. Most of October was spent in the Omaha. office and December was devoted to the analyslbs of scats in Jackson, Wyoming. This brief report on the coyote study is being ma.de at the request of Mr. Cahalane, Acting Chief of the • ildlife Division, in a letter dated December 20, to Mr. Allen, Region­ al Director, Region 2. A copy of this letter was sent to me at Yellowstone and mis-forwarded to 1ioran, fanilly reaching me today, January 5. Since the report is wanted in Washington by the middle of January there is not time for making anything but a brief report on my findings so far.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1950 History of navigation on the Yellowstone River John Gordon MacDonald The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation MacDonald, John Gordon, "History of navigation on the Yellowstone River" (1950). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2565. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2565 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY of NAVIGATION ON THE YELLOWoTGriE RIVER by John G, ^acUonald______ Ë.À., Jamestown College, 1937 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Arts. Montana State University 1950 Approved: Q cxajJL 0. Chaiinmaban of Board of Examiners auaue ocnool UMI Number: EP36086 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Ois8<irtatk>n PuUishing UMI EP36086 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Soda Butte Creek
    Soda Butte Creek monitoring and sampling schemes Final report for the Greater Yellowstone Network Vital Signs Monitoring Program Susan O’Ney Resource Management Biologist Grand Teton National Park P.O. Drawer 170 Moose, Wyoming 83012 Phone: (307) 739 – 3666 December 2004 SODA BUTTE CREEK and REESE CREEK: VITAL SIGNS MONITORING PROGRAM: FINAL REPORT December 2004 Meredith Knauf Department of Geography and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado, Boulder Mark W. Williams* Department of Geography and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado, Boulder *Corresponding Address Mark W. Williams INSTAAR and Dept. of Geography Campus Box 450 Boulder, Colorado 80309-0450 Telephone: (303) 492-8830 E-mail: [email protected] Soda_Butte_Creek_Compiled_with_Appendices .doc 5/17/2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We have put together a final report on the recommendations for the Soda Butte Creek and Reese Creek Vital Signs Monitoring Program. The purpose of the grant was to develop detailed protocols necessary to monitor the ecological health of Soda Butte Creek and Reese Creek in and near Yellowstone National Park. The main objectives was to compile existing information on these creeks into one database, document the current conditions of Soda Butte and Reese Creeks by a one-time synoptic sampling event, and present recommendations for vital signs monitoring programs tailored to each creek’s needs. The database is composed of information from government projects by the United States Geological Survey and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, graduate student master’s theses, academic research, and private contractor reports. The information dates back to 1972 and includes surface water quality, groundwater quality, sediment contamination, vegetation diversity, and macroinvertebrate populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Water Temperature and Flow at Tantalus Creek During Calendar Year 2005, Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming
    Systematics of Water Temperature and Flow at Tantalus Creek During Calendar Year 2005, Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5234 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 This report and any updates to it are available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5234/ For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS — the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Clor, L., Lowenstern, J., Heasler, H, 2007, Systematics of water temperature and flow at Tantalus Creek during calendar year 2005, Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2007-5234. Cataloging-in-publication data are on file with the Library of Congress (http://www.loc.gov/). Produced in the Western Region, Menlo Park, California Manuscript approved for publication, August 28, 2007 Text edited by James W. Hendley II Layout by David R. Jones FRONT COVER—Tantalus Creek collects nearly all the thermal water discharged at the Norris Geyser Basin, pictured below.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Conservation
    Yellowstone SScience Native Fish Conservation @ JOSH UDESEN Native Trout on the Rise he waters of Yellowstone National Park are among the most pristine on Earth. Here at the headwaters of the Missouri and Snake rivers, the park’s incredibly productive streams and lakes support an abundance of fish. Following the last Tglacial period 8,000-10,000 years ago, 12 species/subspecies of fish recolonized the park. These fish, including the iconic cutthroat trout, adapted and evolved to become specialists in the Yellowstone environment, underpinning a natural food web that includes magnificent animals: ospreys, bald eagles, river otters, black bears, and grizzly bears all feed upon cutthroat trout. When the park was established in 1872, early naturalists noted that about half of the waters were fishless, mostly because of waterfalls which precluded upstream movement of recolonizing fishes. Later, during a period of increasing popularity of the Yellowstone sport fishery, the newly established U.S. Fish Commission began to extensively stock the park’s waters with non-natives, including brown, brook, rainbow, and lake trout. Done more than a century ago as an attempt to increase an- gling opportunities, these actions had unintended consequences. Non-native fish caused serious negative impacts on native fish populations in some watersheds, and altered the parks natural ecology, particularly at Yellowstone Lake. It took a great deal of effort over many decades to alter our native fisheries. It will take a great deal more work to restore them. As Aldo Leopold once said, “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Lakes Guide: Absaroka, Beartooth & Crazies
    2021 MOUNTAIN LAKES GUIDE Silver Lake ABSAROKA - BEARTOOTH & CRAZY MOUNTAINS Fellow Angler: This booklet is intended to pass on information collected over many years about the fishery of the Absaroka-Beartooth high country lakes. Since Pat Marcuson began surveying these lakes in 1967, many individuals have hefted a heavy pack and worked the high country for Fish, Wildlife and Parks. They have brought back the raw data and personal observations necessary to formulate management schemes for the 300+ lakes in this area containing fish. While the information presented here is not intended as a guide for hiking/camping or fishing techniques, it should help wilderness users to better plan their trips according to individual preferences and abilities. Fish species present in the Absaroka-Beartooth lakes include Yellowstone cutthroat trout, brook trout, rainbow trout, golden trout, arctic grayling, and variations of cutthroat/rainbow/golden trout hybrids. These lake fisheries generally fall into two categories: self-sustaining and stocked. Self-sustaining lakes have enough spawning habitat to allow fish to restock themselves year after year. These often contain so many fish that while fishing can be fast, the average fish size will be small. The average size and number of fish present change very little from year to year in most of these lakes. Lakes without spawning potential must be planted regularly to sustain a fishery. Standard stocking in the Beartooths is 50-100 Yellowstone cutthroat trout fingerlings per acre every eight years. Special situations may call for different species, numbers, or frequency of plants. For instance, lakes with heavy fishing pressure tend to be stocked more often and at higher densities.
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat Evaluation of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2014 Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Cockrell, Laura Elizabeth, "Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park" (2014). Online Theses and Dissertations. 222. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/222 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK By Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Bachelor of Science California State University, Chico Chico, California 2007 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 Copyright © Laura Elizabeth Cockrell, 2014 All rights reserved ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family and friends for their unwavering support during this adventure. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was made possible through funding from the Yellowstone Park Foundation and the Society of Wetland Scientists Student Research Grant for support of field work, and by a Graduate Assistantship and Research Assistantship from the Department of Biological Sciences at Eastern Kentucky University. Thank you to Dr. Bob Frederick for his insight and persistence and for providing the GIS lab and to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone River - Cumulative Effects Analysis
    Yellowstone River - Cumulative Effects Analysis Project Objectives 1. Evaluate the cumulative hydraulic, biological, and socioeconomic impacts of human activity on the Yellowstone River. 2. Develop recommended management practices and position statements. Project Extent • Gardiner MT to the Missouri River confluence (565 River Miles) Yellowstone River Cumulative Effects Assessment Montana’s Involvement • Yellowstone River Conservation District Council (YRCDC) • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) • Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) • 2004 Cost-Share Agreement with Corps of Engineers • YRCDC – Local Leadership and Participation Primary Project Components • Hydrology • Avian • Hydraulics - Floodplain • Fisheries • Channel Geomorphology • Land Use Trends • Riparian • Socioeconomics • Wetlands • Lidar Topographic Mapping • Water Quality • Cumulative Effects Analysis Hydrology A Comparison of Pre-Development and Modern Stream Flows Main Results: • Natural streamflows have been affected by human development. • Primary influences are flow alterations on the Bighorn River and irrigation withdrawals. • The Yellowstone River has responded to these flow alterations. Bighorn River Watershed 22,885 square miles (33%) of total Yellowstone River watershed Yellowtail Dam/ Bighorn Reservoir Buffalo Bill Reservoir Boysen Reservoir Bighorn River Flow Alterations Yellowtail Dam: Built mid-1960s • 1,331,725 acre-feet of storage in Bighorn Reservoir • Flood control targets including preventing flows at the confluence of the Yellowstone River from exceeding 25,000
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Terrestrial and Limnologic Development in the Northern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (USA) During the Late-Glacial/Early- Holocene Transition Teresa R
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of 2015 Patterns of Terrestrial and Limnologic Development in the Northern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (USA) during the Late-Glacial/Early- Holocene Transition Teresa R. Krause Montana State University, [email protected] Yanbin Lu University of Nebraska-Lincoln Cathy Whitlock Montana State University, [email protected] Sherilyn C. Fritz University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Kenneth L. Pierce US Geological Survey, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Krause, Teresa R.; Lu, Yanbin; Whitlock, Cathy; Fritz, Sherilyn C.; and Pierce, Kenneth L., "Patterns of Terrestrial and Limnologic Development in the Northern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (USA) during the Late-Glacial/Early-Holocene Transition" (2015). Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 453. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/453 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 422 (2015), pp. 46–56; doi: 10.1016/ j.palaeo.2014.12.018 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. Used by permission. Submitted March 26, 2014; revised October 31, 2014; accepted December 5, 2014; published online January 22, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Geochemistry in Yellowstone National Park—Natural and Anthropogenic Anomalies and Their Potential Impact on the Environment
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2007 Environmental Geochemistry in Yellowstone National Park—Natural and Anthropogenic Anomalies and Their Potential Impact on the Environment Maurice A. Chaffee U.S. Geological Survey Robert R. Carlson U.S. Geological Survey Harley D. King U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Chaffee, Maurice A.; Carlson, Robert R.; and King, Harley D., "Environmental Geochemistry in Yellowstone National Park—Natural and Anthropogenic Anomalies and Their Potential Impact on the Environment" (2007). Publications of the US Geological Survey. 68. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Environmental Geochemistry in Yellowstone National Park—Natural K and Anthropogenic Anomalies and Their Potential Impact on the Environment By Maurice A. Chaffee, Robert R. Carlson, and Harley D. King Chapter K of Integrated Geoscience Studies in the Greater Yellowstone Area— Volcanic, Tectonic, and Hydrothermal Processes in the Yellowstone Geoecosystem Edited by Lisa A. Morgan Professional Paper 1717 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Fishing the Yellowstone Area: Hatch Charts and Angling Quality Charts
    Fly Fishing the Yellowstone Area: Hatch Charts and Angling Quality Charts This document compiles the general hatch charts, angling quality by timeframe charts, and fishery- specific hatch and fly suggestion charts provided on the how-to portion of the Parks’ Fly Shop website (www.parksflyshop.com) in an easy-to-print (and view) format. Please visit this website for much more information on fly fishing the Yellowstone area and southern Montana. I hope you find this information helpful. If you’re considering booking a fly fishing trip in Yellowstone or Montana, we would appreciate your business. Regards, Walter Wiese Head Guide, Parks’ Fly Shop (http://www.parksflyshop.com) www.flywalter.com [email protected] (406) 223-8204 This work is copyright Walter Wiese, 2018. You may distribute this document however you please, including for commercial purposes, in print or digital formats, with the following caveats: you may not alter it, you may not claim it as your own work, you must distribute the entire document if you choose to distribute any of it, and you must include this introduction and my contact information above. Table of Contents Here are some notes on how this document is organized… ................................................................... 3 General Hatch Charts .................................................................................................................................. 5 Where Should I Fish?...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Fish with Cover
    Yellowstone Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences Annual Report 2003 Thorofare Creek, October 2003. ellowstone National Park’s Yellowstone Lake is whirling behavior, abnormal feeding, and increased home to the premier surviving inland cutthroat vulnerability to predation, was first detected in Yellowstone Y trout fishery in North America. Two significant Lake in 1998, and in the Firehole River in 2000. This threats to the native Yellowstone cutthroat trout, discovered devastating disease further threatens already declining over a five-year period during the 1990s, irreversibly Yellowstone cutthroat trout populations. Although whirling altered the future of this thriving and diverse ecosystem. disease is currently believed to be concentrated in the Without swift, continuing action, negative effects on this northern regions of the Yellowstone Lake watershed, several trout population—a keystone energy source for numerous other tributaries have already been identified as at high risk. mammal and bird species and a recreational focus for In addition to native trout preservation, aquatics visitors—have the potential to produce ecosystemwide program goals include restoration of isolated but genetically consequences. pure westslope cutthroat trout, monitoring to track aquatic Predatory, non-native lake trout were likely illegally ecosystem health and expedite early warnings for other introduced to the lake in 1988 and not discovered until invasive exotic species, and encouragement of public 1994. They can consume 50–90 Yellowstone cutthroat trout involvement in various fisheries programs. per capita annually. Without heightened and maintained The stakes are high, raising the bar for innovative management efforts, they have the potential to decimate management and fundraising. The increased magnitude the Yellowstone Lake fishery in our lifetime.
    [Show full text]