DOCSLIB.ORG

Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COIVIPANY Report Number: GEO. DCPI>.TR.l4.01 GEOSCIENCES DEPARTlVH~ NT Report Revision: Rev. 0 TECHNICAL REPORT Report Date: 6/30/2014 Quality Related: Y Pagel of61 6ho /2-D2 l ~ PREPARED BY: /~ {'. , ~--·· DATE: ______f __ __1____ __ Lettis Consultants Stq~hen Thompson International, Inc. (LCI) Printed Name Organization VERIFIED BY: DATE: c. I'>? b-0/ t.j William Page PG&E Geosciences Department Printed Name Organization APPROVED BY: Printed Name Organization Page 2 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 RECORD OF REVISIONS Rev. No. Reason for Revision Revision Date Initial Release. This work was defined and tracked under SAPN 0 6/30/2014 50470704. Page 3 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Signatories ........................................................................................................................ 1 Record of Revisions .......................................................................................................... 2 List of Tables, Figures, Plates, Appendices, and Attachments ......................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................ 8 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Intended Use of the Results .......................................................................... 10 1.3 Scope of Work ............................................................................................... 10 1.4 Project QA Program, Participating Organizations, and Responsibilities........ 11 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS ..................................................................................................... 12 3.0 DATA ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Previously Collected Geologic and Geospatial Map Data ............................. 13 3.1.1 Previously Collected Geologic Map Data .......................................... 13 3.1.2 Previously Collected Geospatial Data ............................................... 16 3.2 Available Deep Well and Borehole Data ....................................................... 17 3.3 New Geologic Map Data ................................................................................ 18 4.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Preliminary Review and Identification of Priority Areas ................................. 20 4.2 Compilation of Previously Collected Geologic Data ...................................... 20 4.3 Field Mapping and Collection of New Data ................................................... 21 4.4 Integration of New Geologic Map Data with Previously Collected Data ........ 22 4.5 Analysis of the Geologic Data for Production of Geologic Maps ................... 24 4.5.1 Selection of Map Units and Symbols ................................................. 24 4.5.2 Selection of Map Scale and Extent .................................................... 25 5.0 SOFTWARE ........................................................................................................... 26 6.0 RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 27 6.1 Irish Hills Study Area ..................................................................................... 27 6.2 DCPP Study Area .......................................................................................... 27 6.3 Price Canyon Study Area .............................................................................. 28 6.4 Appendix A: Daily Field Reports .................................................................... 28 Page 4 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 6.5 Appendix B: Field Photographs ..................................................................... 29 6.6 Appendix C: Field Samples ........................................................................... 29 6.7 Appendix D: GIS Files and Layers ................................................................ 29 6.8 Appendix E: Well Data Report ....................................................................... 29 7.0 ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 30 7.1 Nature and Quality of Geologic Mapping in the Study Area .......................... 30 7.2 Stratigraphy of the Study Area ...................................................................... 31 7.2.1 Franciscan Complex Rocks ............................................................... 31 7.2.2 Cretaceous Sandstone ...................................................................... 32 7.2.3 Morro Rock–Islay Hill Volcanic Intrusive Complex ............................ 32 7.2.4 Cambria Felsite .................................................................................. 32 7.2.5 Vaqueros Formation .......................................................................... 32 7.2.6 Rincon Formation .............................................................................. 33 7.2.7 Obispo Formation .............................................................................. 33 7.2.7.1 Volcaniclastic and Clastic Sub-units .................................... 34 7.2.7.2 Obispo Formation, Diabase Sub-unit ................................... 35 7.2.8 Monterey Formation ........................................................................... 35 7.2.9 Pismo Formation ................................................................................ 36 7.2.10 Quaternary Deposits .......................................................................... 37 7.3 Geologic Structure of the Study Areas .......................................................... 37 7.3.1 Folding ............................................................................................... 38 7.3.2 Faulting .............................................................................................. 39 7.3.2.1 Los Osos Fault Zone ........................................................... 40 7.3.2.2 Edna Fault Zone .................................................................. 46 7.3.2.3 San Miguelito Fault Zone ..................................................... 47 7.3.2.4 San Luis Bay Fault Zone ..................................................... 48 7.3.2.5 Shoreline Fault Zone ........................................................... 49 7.4 Changes to Previous Geologic Maps and Compilation Efforts ...................... 50 7.4.1 Northeastern Margin of the Pismo Syncline ...................................... 50 7.4.2 Southwest Limb of the Pismo Syncline, Monterey Formation/ Pismo Formation Contact ............................................................................. 51 7.4.3 Southwest Limb of the Pismo Syncline, Obispo Formation/ Monterey Formation Contact ............................................................................. 51 Page 5 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 7.4.4 Franciscan Chert and Serpentinite, Los Osos Fault Zone ................. 52 7.4.5 Neogene Marine Deposits Within Western Los Osos Valley ............. 52 7.4.6 New Mapping Offshore of the DCPP ................................................. 53 8.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 54 9.0 LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................... 56 10.0 IMPACT EVALUATION .......................................................................................... 57 11.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 58 Page 6 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 LISTS OF TABLES, FIGURES, PLATES, APPENDICES, AND ATTACHMENTS Tables Table 3-1 Sources of Previous Geologic Map Data Considered for the GMP Table 3-2 Sources of Previously Collected Geospatial Data Table 4-1 Guidelines for Describing Structural Measurement Uncertainty Figures Figure 1-1 Study Areas and Onshore Seismic-Reflection Data Coverage Figure 3-1 Locations of New Geologic Data Collection Sites Figure 3-2 Locations of Selected Wells Figure 3-3 Geologic Maps by C.A. Hall Considered in This Study Figure 3-4 Geologic Maps Developed for the LTSP Considered in This Study Figure 3-5 Map of the Los Osos Fault Zone by Lettis and Hall (1994) Considered in This Study Figure 3-6 Geologic Maps by T.W. Dibblee Considered in This Study Figure 3-7 Geologic Maps by M.O. Wiegers Considered in This Study Figure 3-8 Offshore Geologic Maps Developed for the Shoreline Fault Zone Report and Unpublished Onshore Map Data Collected in 2009 and 2010 by PG&E Figure 3-9 Geologic Map of the Price Canyon Study Area Figure 7-1 Locations of Significant Revisions to Existing Geologic Maps Figure 7-2 Comparison of (a) Revised and (b) Previous (AMEC, 2012a) Mapping, Northeastern Margin of the Pismo Syncline Figure 7-3 Comparison of (a) Revised and (b) Previous (AMEC, 2012a) Mapping, Pismo Fm./Monterey Fm.Contact Figure 7-4 Comparison of (a) Revised and (b) Previous (PG&E, 2011) Mapping, Monterey Fm./Obispo Fm. Contact Figure 7-5 Comparison of (a) Revised and (b) Previous (AMEC, 2012a) Mapping, Los Osos
Recommended publications
  • City of San Luis Obispo Open Space Vegetation Management Plan

    City of San Luis Obispo Open Space Vegetation Management Plan

    CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO OPEN SPACE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN A Professional Project presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning by Danielle Rose Althaus June 2014 ©2014 Danielle Rose Althaus ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: City of San Luis Obispo Open Space Vegetation Management Plan AUTHOR: Danielle Rose Althaus DATE SUBMITTED: June 2014 COMMITTEE CHAIR: W. David Conn, D. Phil. Professor, City and Regional Planning COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kenneth C. Topping, AICP Lecturer, City and Regional Planning COMMITTEE MEMBER: Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager, City of San Luis Obispo iii ABSTRACT City of San Luis Obispo Open Space Vegetation Management Plan Danielle Rose Althaus This Master’s Professional Project is focused on the development of a draft Vegetation Management Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo Open Space properties. The purpose of the plan is to provide a comprehensive document which identifies how the city is addressing wildfire preparedness in city-owned open space properties. Methods used in plan development include a literature review, content analysis, geographic information systems (GIS), a course audit, and consultation with city staff and other stakeholders. Each open space property is identified in the plan, describing its location, vegetation, topography, assets, access points, water supply, evacuation routes, historical fire data, predominant risk exposure, current wildfire preparedness plan, priority ranking, and a proposed implementation plan. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without motivation from Rodger Maggio and Robert Hill. I would like to thank the both of you for your continuous encouragement and support throughout this process.
  • Eagle Rock Self-Guided Nature Trail

    Eagle Rock Self-Guided Nature Trail

    Eagle Rock Self-Guided sages. This evergreen plant has narrow dark green #6 - Dairy Creek, Camp San Luis and West Cuesta the spiny rolled edges. Like other oaks, the Coast leaves and orange-yellow flowers in spring and Ridge Vistas - Take a short break here and enjoy the Live Oak was a major food source for the Chumash Nature Trail summer. The young stems and leaves have been view to West Cuesta Ridge. Burned extensively in Indians. In early spring a golden glow may appear on used as salad greens by Indians. The crushed raw 1994 by the huge 41 these trees. If you take a branch covered with tiny Welcome to the Eagle Rock Self Guided Nature leaves and stems have been used to heal burns and Fire, the Los Padres catkins, you can see the yellow pollen fly on the Trail. This is a 1.8 mile trip to explore the flora, wounds. National Forest is breeze. This is the first step towards the tree making fauna and history of the Chorro Valley. This trail Coyote Bush (Baccharis making a strong acorns. offers great views of Chorro Valley and surrounding pilularis) is a common recovery. Many new hillsides. Take your time and enjoy your outdoor shrub of chaparral. It has seedlings have started to #9 - Dusky-footed Woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes) adventure. small leathery leaves 1/2 grow, including the Nests - As you look around you will see what seem If at the end of your adventure and you no longer to 1 inch long, with a Sergeant Cypress to be piles of debris up to 6 feet high.
  • 4.1 Geology/Hazards

    4.1 Geology/Hazards

    Dalidio/San Luis Marketplace Annexation and Development Project EIR Section 4.1 Geology/Hazards 4.1 GEOLOGY/HAZARDS The project site lies within the seismically active coastal region of central California. Regional studies indicate that there are no active or potentially active faults on the project site. However, groundshaking associated with nearby faults could damage or destroy property, structures and transportation infrastructures. These impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels. In addition, site soils are reported to have a high liquefaction potential, a moderate to high expansion potential and a potential for subsidence. These impacts are considered less than significant with the adherence to mitigation measures. The Dalidio property could potentially be subject to contamination that has migrated from off-site hazardous materials releases. Implementation of recommended mitigation measures, including soils and groundwater testing along the northwestern site boundary to determine the presence of such contamination on site, and appropriate remediation if necessary, would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. The proposed Prado Road/ U.S. Highway 101 interchange and associated improvements could be located on soils that contain residual quantities of aerially-deposited lead (ADL) associated with historic exhaust emissions along U.S. Highway 101. The release of ADL during disturbance of this area would be considered a potentially significant but mitigable health hazard. 4.1.1 Geologic Setting. This section describes the geologic conditions and related hazards of the project site, including faulting, seismically induced ground movement, liquefaction potential, potential for soil expansion/contraction and a subsidence potential. a. Regional Topography. The Dalidio property is located west of U.S.
  • Lopez Residence Project

    Lopez Residence Project

    LOPEZ RESIDENCE PROJECT 2420 PARADISE LANE, LOS OSOS SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (APN 067-171-049) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Mr. Christopher Lopez 3020 Ironwood Avenue Morro Bay, California 93442 Prepared by: KMA Kevin Merk Associates, LLC P.O. Box 318 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 June 2020 KMA 2420 Paradise Lane, Los Osos, CA Biological Resources Assessment AUTHENTICITY AND SIGNATURE PAGE As a County-approved biologist, I hereby certify that this Biological Resources Assessment was prepared according to the Guidelines established by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building and that the statements furnished in the report and associated maps are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; and I further certify that I was present throughout the site visits associated with this report. ________________________________________________________ 6/4/2020 Kevin Merk Date Principal Biologist Mr. Christopher Lopez KMA 2420 Paradise Lane, Los Osos, CA Biological Resources Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................................ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Description ......................................................................................................................................................1
  • Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California

    Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California

    Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California Luis Obispo County Maria As the Nation~sprincz§bal conservation a(gen~y, the Department ofthe Interior has reJponsibili!yfor most of ournational!y ownedpublic lands and natural resources. This includesfostering the wisest use ofourland and water resources, protecting ourfish and wild4fe, preserving the environmental and cultural values of ournationalparks and historical places, andprovidingfor the enjoyment of4fe through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our ene~gv and mineral resources and works to assure that theirdevelopment is in the best interests ofall ourpeople. The Department also has a major responsibili~yforAmerican Indian reservation communities andforpeople who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California Helminthoglypta walkeriana (Morro shoulderband snail) A rctostaphylos morroensis (Morro manzanita) Friodictyon altissimum (Indian Knob mountainbaim) Cirsiumfontinale var. obispoense (Chorro Creek bog thistle) Clarkia speciosa ssp. immaculata (Pismo clarkia) prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura, California for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon September 1998 Approved: Manager, Califor evada Operations Office, Region 1, U.S. F and Wildlife Service Date: ~2( I ft DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover andlor protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities.
  • An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810

    An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810

    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Government Documents and Publications First Nations Era 3-10-2017 2005 – An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_ind_1 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Education Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "2005 – An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810" (2017). Government Documents and Publications. 4. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_ind_1/4 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the First Nations Era at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government Documents and Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumash Communities – 1769 to 1810 By: Randall Milliken and John R. Johnson March 2005 FAR WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. 2727 Del Rio Place, Suite A, Davis, California, 95616 http://www.farwestern.com 530-756-3941 Prepared for Caltrans Contract No. 06A0148 & 06A0391 For individuals with sensory disabilities this document is available in alternate formats. Please call or write to: Gale Chew-Yep 2015 E. Shields, Suite 100 Fresno, CA 93726 (559) 243-3464 Voice CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929 An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumash Communities – 1769 to 1810 By: Randall Milliken Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. and John R. Johnson Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Submitted by: Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. 2727 Del Rio Place, Davis, California, 95616 Submitted to: Valerie Levulett Environmental Branch California Department of Transportation, District 5 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Contract No.
  • Natural History of the Southern Sea Otter

    Natural History of the Southern Sea Otter

    Natural History of the Southern Sea Otter C Compiled by Gena Bentall 2017 Description Sea otters are members of the weasel or mustelid family. Like other members of this family, they have very thick fur. In fact, at 850,000 to one million hairs per square inch, they have the thickest fur of any mammal. Their fur consists of two types of hairs, interlocking underfur (which provides insulation) and longer guard hairs (that help water run off the coat). This system traps a layer of air next to their skin so, when fur is well groomed, their skin does not come in contact with sea water. Sea otters are usually dark brown, and some individuals may be progressively lighter colored (grizzled) on the head, neck, chest and forearms due to loss of pigmentation in the guard hairs. Extent of grizzle can be related to age and individual variation. Sea otters are the smallest marine mammal, and with their flipper-shaped hind feet are well adapted to a marine environment. In California adult females weigh 35-60 pounds (16-27 kg); males reach up to 90 pounds (40 kg). Alaskan sea otters are bigger with males weighing as much as 100 pounds (45 kg). Range/Habitat Sea otters once ranged around the North Pacific Rim from Mexico through Alaska, Russia, and Japan. The maritime fur trade of the 1700-1800s brought sea otters to the brink of extinction and fragmented the once continuous population. There are currently 3 subspecies of sea otter, the Northern Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni), the Asian, or Russian, Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris lutris) and our Southern, or California, Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis).
  • San Luis Obispo R Main Region Ntena Nal Tra Nce Fa Ansit Au Acility

    San Luis Obispo R Main Region Ntena Nal Tra Nce Fa Ansit Au Acility

    San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Maintenance Facility Project Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority 179 Cross Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, California 93401 prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, California 93401 July 2017 San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Maintenance Facility Project Initial Study – Mitigated NNegative Declaration prepared by San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority 179 Cross Street, Suitee A San Luis Obispo, California 93401 prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, Callifornia 93401 July 2017 This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post‐consumer content. Table of Contents Table of Contents Initial Study ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Project Title ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Lead Agency Name and Address ........................................................................ 1 3 Contact Person and Phone Number ................................................................... 1 4 Project Location .................................................................................................. 1 5 General Plan Designation ..................................................................................
  • Clast Provenance Constraints, Late Cretaceous Pigeon Point Formation, California

    Clast Provenance Constraints, Late Cretaceous Pigeon Point Formation, California

    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Fall 2010 Clast Provenance Constraints, Late Cretaceous Pigeon Point Formation, California Anne Sanquini San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Sanquini, Anne, "Clast Provenance Constraints, Late Cretaceous Pigeon Point Formation, California" (2010). Master's Theses. 3893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.gbfk-zfc9 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3893 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAST PROVENANCE CONSTRAINTS, LATE CRETACEOUS PIGEON POINT FORMATION, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geology San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Anne Sanquini December 2010 © 2010 Anne Sanquini ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled CLAST PROVENANCE CONSTRAINTS, LATE CRETACEOUS PIGEON POINT FORMATION, CALIFORNIA by Anne Sanquini APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY December 2010 Dr. Ellen P. Metzger Department of Geology Robert J. McLaughlin United States Geological Survey Dr. Richard L. Sedlock Department of Geology ABSTRACT CLAST PROVENANCE CONSTRAINTS, LATE CRETACEOUS PIGEON POINT FORMATION, CALIFORNIA by Anne Sanquini The depositional location of the Late Cretaceous Pigeon Point Formation, which crops out between San Francisco and Santa Cruz on the California coast, is unknown.
  • San Luis Obispo County, California and Incorporated Areas

    San Luis Obispo County, California and Incorporated Areas

    VOLUME 1 OF 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ARROYO GRANDE, CITY OF 060305 ATASCADERO, CITY OF 060700 EL PASO DE ROBLES, CITY OF 060308 GROVER BEACH, CITY OF 060306 MORRO BAY, CITY OF 060307 PISMO BEACH, CITY OF 060309 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITY OF 060310 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 060304 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) REVISED: November 16, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06079CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 28, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Date: November 16, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 6 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
  • Download REPORT TITLE: Geologic Mapping and Data

    Download REPORT TITLE: Geologic Mapping and Data

    Page 2 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 RECORD OF REVISIONS Rev. No. Reason for Revision Revision Date Initial Release. This work was defined and tracked under SAPN 0 6/30/2014 50470704. Page 3 of 61 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.01, Rev. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Signatories ........................................................................................................................ 1 Record of Revisions .......................................................................................................... 2 List of Tables, Figures, Plates, Appendices, and Attachments ......................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................ 8 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Intended Use of the Results .......................................................................... 10 1.3 Scope of Work ............................................................................................... 10 1.4 Project QA Program, Participating Organizations, and Responsibilities........ 11 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS ..................................................................................................... 12 3.0 DATA ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Previously
  • Appendix G Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation

    Appendix G Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation

    Appendix G Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Ranch Project Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation U.S.G.S. San Luis Obispo, CA quadrangle Prepared for: City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Authors: Ashlee M. Bailey, M.A., RPA Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, M.H.P, Shannon Carmack, B.A., and Christopher Duran, M.A., RPA November 2016 Keywords: San Luis Obispo, CA quadrangle; San Luis Obispo County; intensive pedestrian survey; positive; prehistoric resources; historic resources impacted CONFIDENTIAL DISTRIBUTION The following document contains sensitive and confidential information concerning Native American site locations and components and should not be included in copies of this report for general distribution. Archaeological site locations are exempted from the California Public Records Act, as specified in Government Code 6254.10, and from the Freedom of Information Act (Exemption 3), under the legal authority of both the National Historic Preservation Act (PL 102-574, Section 304[a]) and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (PL 96-95, Section 9[a]). Sections of this report contain maps and other sensitive information. Distribution should be restricted appropriately. Bailey, A., S. Zamudio-Gurrola, S. Carmack, and C. Duran 2016 Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation for the San Luis Ranch Project, San Luis Obispo County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 14-01011. Report to be filed at the Central Coast Information Center, University of California, Santa Barbara. San Luis Ranch Project Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation San Luis Ranch Project Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................