Synoptic View of Lithospheric S-Wave Velocity Structure in the Southern United States: a Comparison of 3D Seismic Tomographic Models 2020 CALENDAR
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Member Appreciation Issue VOL. 29, NO. 7 | J U LY 2019 Synoptic View of Lithospheric S-Wave Velocity Structure in the Southern United States: A Comparison of 3D Seismic Tomographic Models 2020 CALENDAR BUY ONLINE } rock.geosociety.org/store | from the 2020 Postcards Field toll-freeBUY 1.888.443.4472 ONLINE | +1.303.357.1000, } rock.geosociety.org/store option 3 | [email protected] JULY 2019 | VOLUME 29, NUMBER 7 SCIENCE 4 Synoptic View of Lithospheric S-Wave Velocity Structure in the Southern United States: GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) prints news A Comparison of 3D Seismic Tomographic Models and information for more than 22,000 GSA member readers Alden Netto et al. and subscribing libraries, with 11 monthly issues (March- April is a combined issue). GSA TODAY is published by The Cover: Map view of four recent seismic shear wave models of the southern U.S. at 5 km above the Geological Society of America® Inc. (GSA) with offices at 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado, USA, and a mail- Moho, plotted as perturbations with respect to the same average 1D model. Solid black lines represent ing address of P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA. a proposed rift and transform fault system. The southern U.S. has relatively low seismicity compared GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation to western and northeastern North America, so few local earthquakes are available for imaging, and of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, there have historically been few seismic stations to record distant earthquakes as well. These results regardless of race, citizenship, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this were made possible by EarthScope’s Transportable Array. See related article, p. 4–10. publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. © 2019 The Geological Society of America Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within the scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted GSA 2019 Annual Meeting & Exposition permission, without fees or request to GSA, to use a single figure, table, and/or brief paragraph of text in subsequent 11 Message from GSA President 12 RISE and the Events Code work and to make/print unlimited copies of items in GSA TODAY for noncommercial use in classrooms to further Donald I. Siegel of Conduct education and science. In addition, an author has the right to use his or her article or a portion of the article in a thesis 11 Registration 12 On To the Future or dissertation without requesting permission from GSA, provided the bibliographic citation and the GSA copyright credit line are given on the appropriate pages. For any 12 Student Volunteers 13 GeoCareers other use, contact [email protected]. Subscriptions: GSA members: Contact GSA Sales & Service, 12 GSA Section Travel Grants 13 Career Exploration Webinars +1-888-443-4472; +1-303-357-1000 option 3; gsaservice@ geosociety.org for information and/or to place a claim for 12 Transform Your Career by 13 Be a Mentor: Make a Difference non-receipt or damaged copies. Nonmembers and institutions: GSA TODAY is US$102/yr; to subscribe, or for claims for Attending a GSA 2019 non-receipt and damaged copies, contact gsaservice@ Short Course 14 Feed Your Brain—Lunchtime geosociety.org. Claims are honored for one year; please Enlightenment: Michel T. allow sufficient delivery time for overseas copies. Peri- odicals postage paid at Boulder, Colorado, USA, and at Halbouty Distinguished Lecture additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to GSA Sales & Service, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140. GSA TODAY STAFF 16 2019 GSA Medal & Award Recipients Executive Director and Publisher: Vicki S. McConnell 17 2019 GSA Scientific Division Primary Awards Science Editors: Mihai N. Ducea, University of Arizona, Dept. of Geosciences, Gould-Simpson Building, 1040 E 4th 18 2019 GSA Fellows Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA, [email protected] .edu; Peter Copeland, University of Houston, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Science & Research 24 GSA Celebrates Member Milestone Anniversaries Building 1, 3507 Cullen Blvd., Room 314, Houston, Texas 77204-5008, USA, [email protected]. 26 2019 GSA Research Grant Recipients Member Communications Manager: Matt Hudson, [email protected] 33 2019 GSA International, GSA Division, and Section Student Research Awards Managing Editor: Kristen “Kea” Giles, [email protected], [email protected] 35 2019 Cole Awards Graphics Production: Emily Levine, [email protected] 35 GSA Minority Scholarships Advertising Manager: Ann Crawford, +1-800-472-1988 ext. 1053; +1-303-357-1053; 35 Watch Your Email for An Important Opportunity to Add Your Voice to Fax: +1-303-357-1070; [email protected] the Discussion GSA Online: www.geosociety.org GSA TODAY: www.geosociety.org/gsatoday 36 Welcome New GSA Members! Printed in the USA using pure soy inks. 46 In Memoriam 47 2019 Field Award Recipients 48 Meet Your Fiscal Year 2019 Officers & Councilors 50 2018–2019 GSA-USGS Congressional Science Fellow Report 51 36th International Geological Congress (IGC) 52 Congressional Visits and the Power of a Good “Ask” 53 Geoscience Jobs & Opportunities 54 GSA Foundation Update Synoptic View of Lithospheric S-Wave Velocity Structure in the Southern United States: A Comparison of 3D Seismic Tomographic Models Alden Netto, Jay Pulliam, Dept. of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76706, USA; and Patricia Persaud, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA ABSTRACT evolution of the southern U.S. margin tomography. But, first, robust tectonic fea- The southern U.S. continental margin remains poorly understood. The primary tures must be identified. Well-constrained records a history spanning ca. 1.2 Ga, contributing factors to this status quo are features should appear consistently across including two Wilson cycles. However, (1) the presence of a thick sediment cover models. Differences between models could due to a thick sediment cover, the paucity that obscures crustal structure through be due to (1) types of data incorporated, of significant local seismicity, and, until most of the region, (2) the paucity of sig- such as body wave arrival times, surface recently, sparse instrumentation, details nificant local seismicity, and, until recently, wave dispersion, receiver functions, or of this passive margin’s tectonomagmatic (3) sparse seismic instrumentation in the combinations of two or more data types; evolution remain disputed. This paper region. Earthscope’s USArray temporarily (2) measurement techniques employed; compares recent S-wave tomography and densified the set of broadband seismo- (3) the theoretical basis of the forward crustal thickness models based on USArray graphs available for studies of the region’s calculation, such as ray theory versus data to help establish a framework for lithosphere (http://www.usarray.org/ finite difference versus finite frequency; geodynamic interpretation. Large-scale researchers/obs/transportable). Approx- (4) the initial model and parameterization patterns of crustal velocity anomalies, imately 435 stations occupied a total of used; (5) regularization choices (“damp- corresponding to major regional features 1830 locations in the continental U.S., for ing” and “smoothing” schemes and param- such as the Ouachita orogenic front and the two years each, at a nominal spacing of eter values); and (6) inversion methods, Precambrian margin, are generally consis- 70 km. In USArray’s wake, there has been such as gradient-based local minimization tent between the models. The spatial extent a surge in the number of continental-scale versus global optimization techniques. of smaller-scale tectonic features, such as tomographic studies presenting snapshots The purpose of this study is to provide a the Sabine Uplift and Wiggins block, of the compressional and shear wave veloc- systematic analysis of similarities and dif- remains poorly resolved. An inverse rela- ities of the region’s crust and upper mantle. ferences between recent shear wave tomo- tionship between crustal thickness and Although the volume of seismic data avail- graphic models with respect to the litho- Bouguer gravity across the continental able for studies of the region has increased spheric structure of the southern U.S. margin is observed. This model compari- dramatically and sampling of the sub- continental margin. Similar comparisons son highlights the need for additional surface has improved as well, the presence P-wave tomography studies and targeted, of a thick layer of sediments and relatively have been conducted for the western U.S. higher density station deployments to low levels of seismicity (with the exception by Becker (2012) and Pavlis et al. (2012). better constrain tectonic features. of Oklahoma) continue to challenge efforts to image the lithosphere. TECTONIC SETTING INTRODUCTION The collection of models for the south- The region that now comprises the The southern U.S. margin (Fig. 1) ranges ern U.S. region represents the state-of-the- southern U.S. has witnessed two complete from the stable Laurentia craton beneath art of seismic tomography: a broad range Wilson cycles of orogeny and rifting Oklahoma to a stretched and thinned pas- of approaches, the inclusion of various (Fig. 1). These cycles can be chronologi- sive margin to oceanic lithosphere in the types