The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Self-Efficacy Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Self-Efficacy Of Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 2014 The evelopmeD nt of an Instrument to Measure the Self-Efficacy of Students Participating in VEX Robotics Competitions Trevor P. Robinson Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Trevor P., "The eD velopment of an Instrument to Measure the Self-Efficacy of Students Participating in VEX Robotics Competitions" (2014). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 3077. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3077 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE THE SELF-EFFICACY OF STUDENTS PARTICIPATING IN VEX ROBOTICS COMPETITIONS by Trevor P. Robinson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Education (Curriculum and Instruction) Approved: Gary A. Stewardson, Ph.D. Edward Reeve, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member Oenardi Lawanto, Ph.D. James Dorward, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Brian Warnick, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2014 ii Copyright © Trevor P. Robinson 2014 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Self-Efficacy of Students Participating in VEX Robotics Competitions by Trevor P. Robinson, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2014 Major Professor: Dr. Gary A. Stewardson Department: School of Teacher Education and Leadership The number of robotics competitions has steadily increased over the past 30 years. Schools are implementing robotics competitions to increase student content knowledge and interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Companies in STEM-related fields are financially supporting robotics competitions to help increase the number of students pursuing careers in STEM among other reasons. These financial supporters and school administrations are asking what the outcomes of students participating in competitive robotics are. Few studies have been conducted to investigate these outcomes. The studies that have been conducted usually compare students in robotics to students not in robotics. There have not been any studies that compare students to themselves before and after participating in robotics competitions. This may be due to the lack of available instruments to measure student outcomes. This study developed an instrument to measure the self-efficacy of students iv participating in VEX Robotics Competitions (VRC). The VRC is the world’s largest and fastest growing robotics competition available for middle and high school students. Self- efficacy was measured because of its importance to the education community. Students with higher self-efficacy tend to persevere through difficult tasks more frequently than students with low self-efficacy. A person’s self-efficacy has major influence over what interests, activities, classes, college majors, and careers he or she will pursue in life. The self-efficacy survey instrument created through this study was developed through an occupational and task analysis (OTA), and initial content and face validity was established through the OTA process. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted to assist in instrument validation. The reliability was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha. Face validity was established through the OTA process. Construct validity was established through the factor analyses. The processes of the OTA and factor analyses have created an instrument that results indicate is reliable and valid to use in further research studies. (139 pages) v PUBLIC ABSTRACT The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Self-Efficacy of Students Participating in VEX Robotics Competitions by Trevor P. Robinson, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2014 A research study was conducted in the Technology and Engineering Education program at Utah State University. The purpose of the study was to develop a survey instrument to measure the self-confidence of students who have participated in the VEX Robotics Competitions. The survey instrument developed was tested to be appropriate and consistent in measuring the self-confidence of middle school and high school students in the United States. The process to ensure that the survey instrument was appropriate utilized an investigation of the tasks completed by successful VEX Robotics teams through an occupational and task analysis. The investigation utilized expert coaches, mentors, and instructors from across the country. Data were collected in two rounds to test the survey instrument. Data were collected by sending the survey to coaches, mentors, and instructors asking them to administer the survey to their students. Data were also collected at the 2014 VEX Robotics World Championship. The data were analyzed through factor analyses. The results of the factor analyses showed that the survey instrument was appropriate for vi measuring the self-confidence of middle school and high school students who have participated in competitive VEX robotics. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Gary Stewardson for his countless hours of help and support over the last 4 years. His dedication to the technology and engineering education profession and his students was encouraging and motivating. I would also like to thank my committee members, Drs. Edward Reeve, James Dorward, Brian Warnick, and Oenardi Lawanto, for their willingness to work on this research project. The research process would not have been completed without the assistance of Drs. Jacob Bishop and Anne Hunt. I would like to send a big thank you to Raymond Boyles. Working with a friend and colleague like Ray made it possible to persevere through the process. I especially would like to thank my parents for their love and support throughout all the years of my education. Thank you to all of my family and friends who made a trip or multiple trips to Utah to visit me and to give me much needed breaks. I would not have been able to make it through this process without the love and dedication of my wife, Andie. Thank you, Andie, for always pushing me to stay focused, but also making me spend time away from the office before I went crazy. Last, I would like to thank God for seeing me through my education and for providing such a loving spiritual family to surround and support me in my time away from “home.” Trevor P. Robinson viii CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... iii PUBLIC ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... xiv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Statement of the Purpose ................................................................................ 2 Instrument Development Milestones .............................................................. 2 Statement of the Need for the Study ............................................................... 3 Limitations of the Study.................................................................................. 5 Assumptions of the Study ............................................................................... 6 Summary of the Study Procedure ................................................................... 6 Definition of Acronyms and Terms ................................................................ 8 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ......................................................................... 10 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 10 Robotics .......................................................................................................... 10 Robotics Competitions .................................................................................... 12 Self-Efficacy ................................................................................................... 19 Instrument Development ................................................................................. 28 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 36 III. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 38 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 38 Review of Literature and Research Question ................................................. 38 Construct Development and Content Validity Check ..................................... 40 Initial Instrument
Recommended publications
  • Challenge Bowl 2020
    Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Rookies of 2007!
    Team 1511 Presents Brought to you by Meet the Rookies of 2007! During the 2007 competitive season, 261 rookie teams participated in Harris RF Communications Penfield High School, 37 Regional Competitions (including a pilot in Brazil). All of the 261 Rookie Penfield NY Teams are winners, and we applaud their efforts and their accomplishments! But, not all Rookie Teams can make it to the FIRST Championship… We hope you will agree that the 42 Rookie Teams competing this week in www.penfieldrobotics.com Atlanta represent the “Best of the Best”! To help you get to know them we have prepared this overview of each of the Rookie Teams. All Rookie Meet and Greet These teams: Competed at 49 Regional competitions Who's Invited: All 2007 Rookie Teams!! (and any veterans that want to meet Received 36 Rookie All Star Awards this year's great rookie teams!) 2 Rookie Inspiration Awards When: Thursday, April 12, 12:30pm (following webhug) 13 Highest Rookie Seeds Where: Lawn under the photo banner in the Courtyard They also picked up awards for imagery, creativity, technology, website, and What's Happening: Fun Introduction Game, Distribution of Great Rookie innovation in control. Wow! packets with tons of information on Atlanta & your upcoming years, Meet & These teams: Greet other Rookie Teams! Find out what it took for them to get to Atlanta! Were alliance partners in 28 quarterfinal rounds, (sometimes as captains) Bonuses!!: Free Prizes for Rookies!! Group Photo of all Rookie Teams (emailed With 17 making it to the semi-finals, to you!!), Rookie Summary Booklet - get some great info on all the Rookies at 10 moving on to the finals, Championships! and 8 teams were Regional Champions! They have met all the challenges, some with surprising ease and Rah Cha Cha Ruckus III (RCCR 2007) some with great grit and determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Botball 2020!
    Welcome to Botball 2020! Before we get started… 1. Sign in, and collect your materials and electronics. 2. KIPR staff will come around with a flash drive that will have all of the files you need Charge your Wombat batteries per instructions on next couple slides. KIPR Wombat Controller 4. Open the “2020 Parts List” folder, which contains files that list all of your Botball robot kit components. Please go through the lists and verify that you have received everything. 5. Review slides 2 to ~44 (up to the KIPR Software Suite slide). 6. Build the DemoBot(s). Raise your hand if you need help or have questions. Professional Development Workshop Page : 1 © 1993 – 2020 KIPR # Index of Workshop Slides Day 1 Day 2 • Charging KIPR Robotics Controller • Botball Game Review • Botball Overview • Tournament Code Template • Getting started with the KIPR Software Suite • Fun with Functions • Explaining the “Hello, World!” C Program • Repetition, Repetition: Counting • Designing Your Own Program • Moving the iRobot Create: Part 1 • Moving the DemoBot with Motors • Moving the iRobot Create: Part 2 • Moving the DemoBot Servos • Color Camera • Making Smarter Robots with Sensors • iRobot Create Sensors • Repetition, Repetition: Reacting • Logical Operators • Motor Position Counters • Resources and Support • Making a Choice • Line-following • Homework Professional Development Workshop Page : 2 © 1993 – 2020 KIPR # Workshop Goals Day 1 Day 2 • Botball Overview / What’s New! • Botball Game Review • Build DemoBot (optional Create Bot) • Tournament Code Template • Reviewing “Day 1” slides • Create (can be on day 1) • Using the KIPR Software Suite to perform • Debugging connection problems with create activities to your team’s experience level • Reviewing “Day 2” slides • The slides have activities (Tasks) with • Documentation connections to skills you may need or • Resources and Support find helpful for solving challenges found in Botball games.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction IJCAI-01 Conference Committee IJCAI-01 Program Committee: Contents: CONFERENCE CHAIR: Elisabeth André, DFKI GmbH (Germany) Introduction 2 Hector J. Levesque, University of Toronto (Canada) Minoru Asada, Osaka University (Japan) Sponsors & Committees 2-3 Franz Baader, RWTH Aachen (Germany) PROGRAM CHAIR: IJCAI-01 Awards 4 Craig Boutilier, University of Toronto (Canada) Bernhard Nebel,Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg Didier Dubois, IRIT-CNRS (France) Conference at a Glance 5 (Germany) Maria Fox, University of Durham (United Kingdom) Workshop Program 6-7 LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS CHAIR: Hector Geffner, Universidad Simón Bolívar Doctoral Consortium 8 James Hoard, The Boeing Company, Seattle (USA) (Venezuela) Tutorial Program 8 SECRETARY-TREASURER: Georg Gottlob,Vienna University of Technology (Austria) Conference Program Highlights 9 Ronald J. Brachman,AT&T Labs – Research (USA) Invited Speakers 10 Haym Hirsh, Rutgers University (USA) IAAI-01 Conference 11 Eduard Hovy, Information Sciences Institute (USA) Advisory Committee: Joxan Jaffar, National University of Singapore Technical Program 12-19 Bruce Buchanan, University of Pittsburgh (USA) (Singapore) Exhibit Program 20-23 Silvia Coradeschi, Örebro University (Sweden) Daphne Koller, Stanford University (USA) RoboCup 2001 24 Olivier Faugeras, INRIA (France) Fangzhen Lin, Hong Kong University of Science and Registration Information 25 Cheng Hu, Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) Technolog y (Hong Kong) General Information 25-27 Nicholas Jennings, University of London (England) Heikki Mannila, Nokia Research Center (Finland) Conference Maps 28-30 Henry Kautz, University of Washington (USA) Robert Milne, Intelligent Applications (United Kingdom) IJCAI-03 Conference 31 Robert Mercer, University of Western Ontario (Canada) Daniele Nardi, Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Special Meetings 31 Silvia Miksch,Vienna University of Technology (Italy) (Austria) Dana Nau, University of Maryland (USA) Devika Subramanian, Rice University (USA) Patrick Prosser, University of Glasgow (UK) Welcome to IJCAI-01 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Botball Kit for Teaching Engineering Computing
    Botball Kit for Teaching Engineering Computing David P. Miller Charles Winton School of AME Department of CIS University of Oklahoma University of N. Florida Norman, OK 73019 Jacksonville, FL 32224 Abstract Many engineering classes can benefit from hands on use of robots. The KISS Institute Botball kit has found use in many classes at a number of universities. This paper outlines how the kit is used in a few of these different classes at a couple of different universities. This paper also introduces the Collegiate Botball Challenge, and how it can be used as a class project. 1 Introduction Introductory engineering courses are used to teach general principles while introducing the students to all of the engineering disciplines. Robotics, as a multi-disciplinary application can be an ideal subject for projects that stress the different engineering fields. A major consideration in establishing a robotics course emphasizing mobile robots is the type of hands-on laboratory experience that will be incorporated into the course of instruction. Most electrical engineering schools lack the machine shops and expertise needed to create the mechanical aspects of a robot system. Most mechanical engineering schools lack the electronics labs and expertise needed for the actuation, sensing and computational aspects required to support robotics work. The situation is even more dire for most computer science schools. Computer science departments typically do not have the support culture for the kind of laboratories that are more typically associated with engineering programs. On the other hand, it is recognized that computer science students need courses which provide closer to real world experiences via representative hands-on exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Superintendent Pat Mccarty 619-201-8802 [email protected]
    District Mission Statement Recognizing the preeminence of Christ, partnering with parents, Christian Unified Schools Superintendent of San Diego teaches students to think, learn, and live from a Biblical worldview by integrating God and His Word as the primary source of knowledge and truth. Pat McCarty 619-201-8802 [email protected] Our Program Christian High School, founded in 1965 by Tim LaHaye, pioneered private evangelical Christian secondary education in San Diego County. With its tradition of academic, athletic, and artistic excellence CHS created a prototype for Christian schools nation- HS Principal wide. CHS provides a rigorous college-preparatory curriculum for a diverse population of Scott Marshall 396 students including a dynamic International Program. Located in San Diego’s East County, CHS represents a variety of communities, ranging from neighboring rural areas to 619-201-8812 Mexican border cities. [email protected] The International Program was established in 1990 and currently enrolls 71 students from five countries. Our broad curriculum choices sets us apart from other programs. Students live with American homestay families to experience local culture in and out of Program Director school. The Cross Culture Club enlists students from domestic and international Judy Ford backgrounds to blend and learn from one another 619-201-8840 We are pleased to highlight the following areas for the international community: [email protected] Three day, two night all expenses paid trip each school year especially tailored to the international students. This year will be the LA Experience with Hollywood, Disneyland, Santa Monica, and Pepperdine University as the destinations. Four cultural events planned throughout the year to enhance the American experience Assistant to the for each international student and host family.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Space Grant Consortium Georgia Institute of Technology Dr
    Georgia Space Grant Consortium Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Stephen M. Ruffin, Director Telephone Number: 404 894-8200 Consortium URL: www.gasgc.org Grant Number: NNX10AR61H PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program consists of 52 state-based, university-led Space Grant Consortia in each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Annually, each consortium receives funds to develop and implement student fellowships and scholarships programs; interdisciplinary space-related research infrastructure, education, and public service programs; and cooperative initiatives with industry, research laboratories, and state, local, and other governments. Space Grant operates at the intersection of NASA’s interest as implemented by alignment with the Mission Directorates and the state’s interests. Although it is primarily a higher education program, Space Grant programs encompass the entire length of the education GSGC MEMBER: peline, including elementary/secondary and informal education. The Georgia Space Grant Consortium is a Designated/Program Grant Consortium funded at a level of $845,000 for fiscal year 2010. PROGRAM GOALS Diversity The proposed programs were designed to reflect the geographic, gender and ethnic demographics of Georgia. The target goals for all programs will represent the demographics of the State of Georgia, as well as the enrollment of students in colleges and universities according to the National Center for Educational Statistics (Underrepresented Groups – 39.6%, Women – 57%). Outcome 1 Base Grant The programs being conducted by the GSGC consist of providing research opportunities that enhance students’ research capabilities and prepare them for STEM employment. Programs are directed at the undergraduate and graduate level with a strong focus on underrepresented groups in their freshman and sophomore years.
    [Show full text]
  • TJHSST-2021 AB-Awardsbooklet
    Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology ACADEMIC BOOSTERS TEAM CELEBRATION 2020-2021 Released in June 2021 Thomas Jefferson High School Academic Boosters, Inc. TJ Academic Boosters actively supports our outstanding academic teams in their various pursuits. Some twenty academic teams compete in local, state, national, and even international events. As financial resources are not available from Fairfax County Public Schools, Academic Boosters asks families to join the organization by contributing tax-deductible donations at various levels. Academic Boosters defrays teacher travel expenses and student registration fees to the extent possible. Even with this support, academic team members pay for their own travel, room, meals, and other related expenses. TJ Academic Boosters supported the following academic teams in the 2020-2021 school year: Botball, Certamen, Chess Team, Forensics and Congressional Debate Teams, Japan Bowl, Varsity Math Team, Model United Nations, Physics Team, Policy Debate Team, Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas Debate Teams, Quiz Bowl, Rubik’s Cube Club, Science Olympiad and Academic Decathlon. Information about most of the teams is provided on the Academic Boosters website: http://aboosters.sites.tjhsst.edu. For information on TJ’s 8th period academic teams please visit this presentation. Academic Boosters gathers information about team accomplishments for the PTSA newsletter, recognizes family memberships, promotes academic teams at orientations and open houses, and organizes a year-end celebration of our teams’ accomplishments. Our TJ academic teams’ achievements have always been a source of pride for the entire TJHSST community and are a cornerstone of our national reputation for academic excellence. This year in particular, we had reason to be proud.
    [Show full text]
  • Botball: Autonomous Students Engineering Autonomous Robots
    Botball: Autonomous students engineering autonomous robots Cathryne Stein KISS Institute for Practical Robotics [email protected] (405) 579-4609 www.botball.org Abstract Sparking and maintaining an early fascination with engineering and computer programming is of great interest to educators who wish to bring high quality students into these fields, and it is of vital concern to all of us who want to see our country thrive in this world economy. This paper will present an effective, intensive, and enjoyable way of getting middle and high school age students actively engaged in engineering, science, math, and computer programming. The paper describes Botball, an engineering outreach program in which students design, build, and program small autonomous mobile robots. Examples of how Botball may help to draw a diverse population into engineering and computer programming will be discussed. Introduction Recently, over 180 teams of students came together in regional tournaments across the country to match their two autonomous, but cooperative, robots against other teams’ robotic duos in a game of programming, design, strategy, and engineering skill. Most of these regional tournaments took place on college campuses. But the participants were middle and high school students who had designed, programmed and built these robots as part of an engineering outreach program called Botball. These middle and high school students came from a startling diversity of socio-economic backgrounds; they came from inner city and rural schools, private schools, science and technology magnet schools, alternative or continuation schools, as well as your average everyday suburban public school. Some even came from home school situations, community computer clubhouses, or other types of organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Botball 2009 Educator's Workshop
    © 1993-2009 KIPR 1 Botball 2009 Educator’s Workshop While you are waiting: 1. Install KISS-C 2. Install the CBC driver 1. This is the same FTDI USB to serial driver that was used on the XBC 2. If this has already been installed on your machine, you do not need to reinstall it. Reinstalling it will not hurt anything 3. The installer is part of the Botball Tools install for Windows 4. One the Mac, select the appropriate installer from the folder 3. If you are using a Mac and do not have the developer tools installed, flag down the instructor so it can be taken care of 4. If you are not sure how to do the previous steps please ask one of the staff! © 1993-2009 KIPR 2 Botball 2009 Educator’s Workshop v1.5 2009.2.13 © 1993-2009 KIPR 3 2009 Botball Sponsors Yahoo! Employee Foundation Kauai Economic Development Board © 1993-2009 KIPR 4 KISS Institute thanks the following venue sponsors who support Botball by donating workshop and/or tournament venues free of charge: • University of North Florida - Florida Region • Southern Illinois University Edwardsville - Greater St. Louis Region • University of Maryland, College Park - Greater DC Region • Grandville Boosters and Middle School - Michigan Region • Hawaii Convention Center - Hawaii Region • MITRE and the University of Massachusetts Lowell - New England Region • Polytechnic University - New York/New Jersey Region • University of Oklahoma - Oklahoma Region • University of Pittsburgh - Pennsylvania Region • CMU Qatar Campus - Qatar Region • University of San Diego - Southern California Region •
    [Show full text]
  • Techbrick Robotics
    IEEE Robot Challenge VEX http://ewh.ieee.org/r2/baltimore/robot/ http://www.vexrobotics.com A guide to youth Neville Jacobs: [email protected] / 410-653-4176 There are many different Challenges for the VEX Designed for teachers, there is a Robot model Robotics Design System. VEX Challenges exist for suitable for whatever level students are capable of, middle school, high school, and university levels. ROBOTICS for grades 9 to 12. Some Challenges, like Bridge Battle, are worldwide. • Basic 2-leg robot, $49 Others, like Savage Soccer, are regional • Basic 4-leg robot $88 competitions. competitions & activities in • Automated 2-leg robot $69 • Automated 4-leg Robot. $98 Beginning VEX builders can design, assemble and quickly refine their robots through trial and error. Maryland A school’s first 2-leg robot kit is FREE. Teacher Advanced builders can utilize sophisticated Workshops and kickoff occur in November. Papers programming to create highly intelligent bots. are due in March. Competitions are held in April at ************************** the Baltimore Museum of Industry. Check the VEX website for competitions near you. Team guidelines vary depending on the local partner hosting the VEX competition. A basic VEX Kit, the ************** Bridge Battle Competition Field, the Challenge Kit, and team supplies will cost ~$2500 per team. JHU's ERC | CISST K-12 Programs In Maryland, There will be several regional VEX events in MD that will feed into the VEX www.cisst.org/K-12-programs Championship of the Americas and the VEX World Cyndi Ramey - [email protected] / 410.516.6841 Championship. Most of these events will be held between December and April.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Ross Alan Mead
    Curriculum Vitae Dr. Ross Alan Mead 3710 McClintock Avenue Ronald Tutor Hall (RTH), Room 423 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0781 http://robotics.usc.edu/~rossmead E-mail: [email protected] Office: +1 (213) 740-6245 Mobile: +1 (618) 696-2600 EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science, Graduated December 2015 University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA Master of Science in Computer Science, Graduated May 2015 University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, Summa Cum Laude, Graduated December 2007 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (SIUE), Edwardsville, IL EXPERIENCE Semio, 01/2016–present Founder and CEO, 01/2016–present Los Angeles-based robotics software startup making robots easy to use Developing an operating environment based on conversational user interfaces Technologies to create, deploy, access, and use language-based robot applications University of Southern California (USC), 08/2008–12/2015 Graduate Research Assistant, 05/2013–12/2015 Modeling social behaviors for human-robot interaction, 05/2013–12/2015 Body Engineering Los Angeles (NSF GK-12) Fellow, 05/2012–05/2013 Using sociable robotics to promote STEM in K-12 education, 05/2012–12/2015 National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, 05/2009–05/2012 Proxemics: social spacing in situated human-robot interaction, 01/2010–12/2015 Oculesics: eye gaze in situated human-robot interaction, 05/2009–12/2015 Graduate Research Assistant, 08/2008–04/2009 Kinesics: body language in situated human-robot interaction, 01/2009–12/2015 Deixis: spatial referencing in situated human-robot interaction, 08/2008–12/2015 STEM Outreach Coordinator, 08/2008–12/2015 Using robotics to promote STEM in K-12 education, 08/2004–12/2015 Greater Los Angeles Botball regional organizer and instructor, 08/2008–12/2015 Global Conference on Educational Robotics general organizer, 08/2013–08/2014 1 of 17 Ross A.
    [Show full text]