DOCSLIB.ORG

Union Calendar No. 370

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Union Calendar No. 370 1 Union Calendar No. 370 112TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2nd Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 112–522 REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY THIRD QUARTER ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d)) JUNE 12, 2012.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2012 VerDate Mar 15 2010 20:15 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate Mar 15 2010 20:15 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY, Washington, DC, June 12, 2012. Hon. KAREN L. HAAS, Clerk of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MS. HAAS: Pursuant to clause 1(d)(1) of Rule XI and Rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives, attached is a report of the legislative and oversight activities of the Committee on Homeland Security for the Third Quarter of the 111th Congress. Sincerely, PETER T. KING, Chairman. (III) VerDate Mar 15 2010 20:15 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS VerDate Mar 15 2010 20:15 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS Union Calendar No. 370 112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2nd Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 112–522 LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY 112TH CONGRESS Third Quarter JUNE 12, 2012.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. KING, from the Committee on Homeland Security, submitted the following R E P O R T OVERVIEW The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 26, 2011, for an organizational meeting for the 112th Congress under the di- rection of Chairman Peter T. King of New York. The Committee Membership was set at 33 Members: With 19 Republicans and 14 Democrats. The Committee established six Subcommittees: The Sub- committee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Secu- rity Technologies; the Subcommittee on Transportation Security; the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management; the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications; the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Secu- rity; and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence. CONTENTS Page Jurisdiction and Legislative History ...................................................................... 3 Membership and Organization ............................................................................... 9 Full Committee ........................................................................................................ 13 Legislative Activities ........................................................................................ 14 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 36 Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security Tech- nologies ................................................................................................................. 53 Legislative Activities ........................................................................................ 53 VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:11 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6646 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS 2 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 59 Subcommittee on Transportation Security ............................................................ 79 Legislative Activities ........................................................................................ 79 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 85 Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management .......................... 95 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 95 Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications .. 111 Legislative Activities ........................................................................................ 111 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 116 Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security .................................................. 139 Legislative Activities ........................................................................................ 139 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 148 Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence ........................................... 163 Legislative Activities ........................................................................................ 163 Oversight Activities .......................................................................................... 164 Committee Oversight Plan ...................................................................................... 175 Part A, Oversight Plan As Agreed to .............................................................. 175 Part B, Implementation of the Oversight Plan .............................................. 189 Appendices Appendix I—Committee Rules ........................................................................ 215 Appendix II—Membership Changes to the Committee ................................. 229 VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:11 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6646 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS 3 JURISDICTION AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY A provision for the establishment of a Committee on Homeland Security was included in H. Res. 5, the Rules of the House of Rep- resentatives for the 112th Congress, agreed to on January 5, 2011. The jurisdiction of the Committee is as follows: HOUSE RULE X ORGANIZATION OF COMMITTEES Committees and their legislative jurisdictions 1. There shall be in the House the following standing commit- tees, each of which shall have the jurisdiction and related functions assigned by this clause and clauses 2, 3, and 4. All bills, resolu- tions, and other matters relating to subjects within the jurisdiction of the standing committees listed in this clause shall be referred to those committees, in accordance with clause 2 of rule XII, as fol- lows: (I) Committee on Homeland Security (1) Overall homeland security policy. (2) Organization and administration of the Department of Homeland Security. (3) Functions of the Department of Homeland Security relat- ing to the following: (A) Border and port security (except immigration policy and non-border enforcement). (B) Customs (except customs revenue). (C) Integration, analysis, and dissemination of homeland security information. (D) Domestic preparedness for and collective response to terrorism. (E) Research and development. (F) Transportation security. General oversight responsibilities 2. (a) The various standing committees shall have general over- sight responsibilities as provided in paragraph (b) in order to assist the House in (1) its analysis, appraisal, and evaluation of— (A) the application, administration, execution, and effec- tiveness of Federal laws; and (B) conditions and circumstances that may indicate the necessity or desirability of enacting new or additional leg- islation; and (2) its formulation, consideration, and enactment of changes in Federal laws, and of such additional legislation as may be necessary or appropriate. (b)(1) In order to determine whether laws and programs address- ing subjects within the jurisdiction of a committee are being imple- mented and carried out in accordance with the intent of Congress and whether they should be continued, curtailed, or eliminated, each standing committee (other than the Committee on Appropria- tions) shall review and study on a continuing basis— VerDate Mar 15 2010 20:15 Jun 12, 2012 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR522.XXX HR522 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS 4 (A) the application, administration, execution, and effective- ness of laws and programs addressing subjects within its juris- diction; (B) the organization and operation of Federal agencies and entities having responsibilities for the administration and exe- cution of laws and programs addressing subjects within its ju- risdiction; (C) any conditions or circumstances that may indicate the necessity or desirability of enacting new or additional legisla- tion addressing subjects within its jurisdiction (whether or not a bill or resolution has been introduced with respect thereto); and (D) future research and forecasting on subjects within its ju- risdiction. (2) Each committee to which subparagraph (1) applies having more than 20 members shall establish an oversight subcommittee, or require its subcommittees to conduct oversight in their respec- tive jurisdictions, to assist in carrying out its responsibilities under this clause. The establishment of an oversight subcommittee does not limit the responsibility of a subcommittee with legislative juris- diction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 881
    1 Union Calendar No. 881 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–1114 ACTIVITIES OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2019 (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d)(1)) Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdys.gov http://oversight.house.gov/ JANUARY 2, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–945 WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 08, 2019 Jkt 033945 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR1114.XXX HR1114 SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM TREY GOWDY, South Carolina, Chairman JOHN DUNCAN, Tennessee ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland DARRELL ISSA, California CAROLYN MALONEY, New York JIM JORDAN, Ohio ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of MARK SANFORD, South Carolina Columbia JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan WILLIAM LACY CLAY, Missouri PAUL GOSAR, Arizona STEPHEN LYNCH, Massachusetts SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee JIM COOPER, Tennessee VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ROBIN KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDA LAWRENCE, Michigan DENNIS ROSS, Florida BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey MARK WALKER, North Carolina RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI, Illinois ROD BLUM, Iowa JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland JODY B. HICE, Georgia JIMMY GOMEZ, California STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma PETER WELCH, Vermont GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania
    [Show full text]
  • Making Islam an American Religion
    Religions 2014, 5, 477–501; doi:10.3390/rel5020477 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Post-9/11: Making Islam an American Religion Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad 1,* and Nazir Nader Harb 2 1 The Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets, N.W., Washington, DC 20057, USA 2 Department of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Georgetown University, 1437 37th St, N.W., Washington, DC 20057, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-202-687-2575; Fax: +1-202-687-8376. Received: 3 January 2014; in revised form: 19 May 2014 / Accepted: 20 May 2014 / Published: 1210 June 2014 Abstract: This article explores several key events in the last 12 years that led to periods of heightened suspicion about Islam and Muslims in the United States. It provides a brief overview of the rise of anti-Muslim and anti-Islam sentiment known as “Islamophobia”, and it investigates claims that American Muslims cannot be trusted to be loyal to the United States because of their religion. This research examines American Muslim perspectives on national security discourse regarding terrorism and radicalization, both domestic and foreign, after 9/11. The article argues that it is important to highlight developments, both progressive and conservative, in Muslim communities in the United States over the last 12 years that belie suspicions of widespread anti-American sentiment among Muslims or questions about the loyalty of American Muslims. The article concludes with a discussion of important shifts from a Muslim identity politics that disassociated from American identity and ‘American exceptionalism’ to a position of integration and cultural assimilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Market Islamism As Ideology
    Beyond Compare? Free Market Islamism as Ideology Kazmi, Z. (2018). Beyond Compare? Free Market Islamism as Ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 23(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2018.1453252 Published in: Journal of Political Ideologies Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2018 Taylor & Francis.This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:29. Sep. 2021 Beyond Compare? Free Market Islamism as Ideology ZAHEER KAZMI (Journal of Political Ideologies, forthcoming 2018) This paper explores the ideological relationship between free market capitalism and Islamism, shedding particular
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Medical Association 120Th House of Delegates September 18-19, 2015
    Utah Medical Association 120th House of Delegates September 18-19, 2015 Schedule of Events Grand Summit Hotel at The Canyons in Park City, Utah (Unless otherwise indicated, all events will be in the Kokopelli Grand Ballroom) Friday, September 18, 2015 7:30a UMA Registration and Continental Breakfast Please Visit Exhibits 8:30a Opening Session, UMA House of Delegates 10:00a Break Please Visit Exhibits 10:15a Reconvene General Session 11:30a Break Please Visit Exhibits 12:00n UMPAC Lunch with Guest Speaker 1:15p Break Please Visit Exhibits 1:45p Reference Committees – Sundial Pavilion and the Painted Horse Rm. 6:30p UMA Presidents’ Recognition Dinner Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:30a Continental Breakfast, Registration & Elections (delegates must sign in both FRIDAY and SATURDAY) 8:00a UMA House of Delegates Resumes 12:00n House Adjourns Utah Medical Association Political Action Committee (UMPAC) invites you to its annual PAC Member Luncheon Friday, September 19, 2015 at Noon The Canyons / Kokopelli Grand Ballroom Special Guest Speaker Zuhdi Jasser, MD Dr. Zasser is a frequent commentator on CNN and Fox News on foreign policy as it relates to Islamists and Jihadists such as ISIS. A practicing Muslim himself, Dr. Zasser has been an advocate of the separation of mosque and state, and a vocal and brave critic of those who resort to extreme or violent measures in the name of religion. Dr. Jasser practices internal medicine and nuclear cardiology in Phoenix, Arizona. He has been an AMA Delegate for many years, where his moderate voice has garnered the respect and admiration of UMA President B.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Freedom Under Attack
    RELIGIOUS FREEDOM UNDER ATTACK The Rise of Anti-Mosque Activities in New York State A Briefing Paper of the New York Civil Liberties Union AUGUST 2011 NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 125 Broad Street, 19th Floor New York, NY 10004 www.nyclu.org Religious Freedom Under Attack: The Rise of Anti-Mosque Activities in New York State AUGUST 2011 NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 125 Broad Street, 19th Floor New York, NY 10004 www.nyclu.org ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper was written by Michael Cummings, Udi Ofer and Naomi Shatz. It was edited by Jennifer Carnig, Helen Zelon and Donna Lieberman. We’d like to thank Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, for his guidance in the writing of this report. ABOUT THE NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION The New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) is one of the nation’s foremost defenders of civil liberties and civil rights. Founded in 1951 as the New York affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union, we are a not- for-profit, nonpartisan organization with eight chapters and regional offices and nearly 50,000 members across the state. Our mission is to defend and promote the fundamental principles and values embodied in the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution, and the New York Constitution, including freedom of speech and religion, and the right to privacy, equality and due process of law for all New Yorkers. For more information about the NYCLU, please visit www.nyclu.org. Contents Introduction .........................................................................5 The Rise of Anti-Muslim Sentiment in the United States .....6 The Constitutional Right to Practice Religion ....................12 Incidents of Anti-Mosque Activities in New York State ......14 Park51 Muslim Community Center ...........................................14 Proposed Sheepshead Bay Community Center .........................18 Proposed Staten Island Mosque ................................................19 Sidney Sufi Community Center.................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Islamophobia and the Anti-Islam Discourse: Common Themes, Parallel Narratives, and Legitimate Apprehensions
    ajiss34-4-noconfrep_ajiss 11/3/2017 9:31 AM Page 56 Review Essay An Analysis of Islamophobia and the Anti-Islam Discourse: Common Themes, Parallel Narratives, and legitimate Apprehensions Books Reviewed: Jonathan Lyons, Islam through Western Eyes: From the Crusades to the War on Terrorism , reprint ed. (New York: Columbia Uni - versity Press: 2014); Nathan Lean, The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Fear of Muslims (London: Pluto Press: 2012); Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire (Chicago: Haymarket Books: 2012); Stephen Sheehi, Islamophobia: The Ideological Campaign against Muslims (Atlanta: Clarity Press: 2011); Todd H. Green, The Fear of Islam: An Introduction to Islamophobia in the West (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2015); and Christopher Bail, Terrified: How Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream (Princeton: Princeton Univer - sity Press, 2015). Introduction In the recent past, fear, hatred, and hostility toward Islam and Muslims in the West have attracted increasing scholarly interest, a development that is certainly commendable. Some important works have delved deeply into the Western imagination and stereotyping of Islam and Muslims, among them John Victor Tolan’s Medieval Christian Perceptions of Islam (1996) and Saracens: Islam in the Medieval European Imagination (2002), Fredrick Quinn’s The Sum of All Heresies: The Image of Islam in Western Thought (2008), Matthew Dimmock’s Mythologies of the Prophet Muham - mad in Early Modern English Culture (2013), 1 and Sophia Rose Arjana’s Muslims in the Western Imagination (2015). The 9/11 terrorist attacks brought about a significant change in the Western imagination and perception of Islam: “Muslim men are so dehu - ajiss34-4-noconfrep_ajiss 11/3/2017 9:31 AM Page 57 Gada: An Analysis of Islamophobia and the Anti-Islam Discourse 57 manized that since 9/11 they have become less than zero..
    [Show full text]
  • CAIR-Islamophobia-Report.Pdf
    Hijacked by Hate by Hijacked ISLAMOPHOBIAISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT REPORT 20182018 Islamophobia Report Islamophobia HijackedHijacked byby Hate Hate COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS – 2019 ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT – 2019 ISLAMOPHOBIA RELATIONS ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC COUNCIL AmericanAmerican Philanthropy Philanthropy and and thethe Islamophobia Islamophobia Network Network ISLAMOPHOBIAISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT REPORT 2019 2019 Copyright ©2019, Council on American-Islamic Relations. CAIR is America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding. Direct questions about this report to: Council on American-Islamic Relations 453 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20003 Tel: 202-488-8787, Fax: 202-488-0833, www.cair.com To obtain copies of this report or to offer comments or feedback, please write to [email protected] and include the subject “2019 Islamophobia Report.” FAIR USE NOTICE: This report may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of political, human rights, democracy, and social justice issues. It is believed that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this report is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material in this report for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • RADICAL ISLAM Anthology”
    RADICALRADICAL ISLAMISLAM ANTHOLOGYANTHOLOGY October 2018 Published in 2018 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2018. All rights reserved. The following publication is a compilation of contributions from a multinational array of speakers who attended the Radical Islam Conference hosted by the Henry Jackson Society on the 6th and 7th of December 2017. Essays have been edited for consistency as well as for fluency in the English language. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees. Title: “RADICAL ISLAM AnTHoLogy” ISBn: 978-1-909035-49-2 £9.95 where sold Cover Photo: optimarc/Shuttersto ck.com RADICAL ISLAM ANTHOLOGY RADICAL ISLAM AnTHoLogy About CRT at The Henry Jackson Society The Centre for the Response to Radicalisation and Terrorism (CRT) is unique in addressing violent and non-violent extremism. By coupling high-quality, in-depth research with targeted and impactful policy recommendations, we aim to combat the threat of radicalisation and terrorism in our society. The Henry Jackson Society is a think-tank and policy-shaping force that fights for the principles and alliances that keep societies free, working across borders and party lines to combat extremism, advance democracy and real human rights, and make a stand in an increasingly uncertain world. The Henry Jackson Society is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales under company number 07465741 and a charity registered in England and Wales under registered charity number 1140489.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Introduction . v A Message from CAIR’s National Executive Director v Key Findings vi Background and Acknowledgments vii CAIR’s Vision Regarding Islamophobia in America ix 01 Financing Prejudice and Hate . 1 Background 1 Methods 2 The Inner Core 3 The Outer Core 3 Network Interdependence 6 Examples of Affluent Supporters of the Network 12 Leadership Compensation 14 Research Limits 14 02 The Inner Core . 17 Act! for America, Brigitte Gabriel 17 American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and its project Stop the Islamization of America 18 American Freedom Law Center, David Yerushalmi 19 American Public Policy Alliance 20 American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD), Dr. Zuhdi Jasser 20 Americans Against Hate, Joe Kaufman 21 Atlas Shrugs, Pamela Geller 22 Bare Naked Islam 23 Bay People 23 Center for Security Policy (CSP), Frank Gaffney 23 Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI), Bill French 24 Christian Action Network 24 Citizens for National Security 24 The Clarion Fund 24 Concerned American Citizens 25 Concerned Citizens for the First Amendment (CCFA) 26 Counter Terrorism Operations Center (CTOC), Sam Kharoba 26 David Horowitz Freedom Center, David Horowitz 26 Debbieschlussel.com, Debbie Schlussel 27 Council on American-Islamic Relations i ISLAMOPHOBIA AND ITS IMPACT IN THE UNITED STATES | LEGISLATING FEAR Dove World Outreach Center, Terry Jones 27 Florida Family Association, David Caton 27 Former Muslims United, Nonie Darwish 28 Forum for Middle East Understanding, Walid Shoebat 29 Gates of Vienna 30 Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT), Steve Emerson 30 Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer 31 Middle East Forum, Daniel Pipes 32 Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) 33 Militant Islam Monitor 34 SAE Productions 34 Society of Americans for National Existence 34 Stop the Islamization of Nations 35 Strategic Engagement Group, Stephen Coughlin, John Guandolo 35 Tennessee Freedom Coalition, Lou Ann Zelenik 36 The Shoebat Foundation 36 The United West 36 The Virginia Anti-Sharia Taskforce 36 03 Islamophobic Themes .
    [Show full text]
  • Jasser-Templeton
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Fax & Email and Posted at www.fpri.org January 2008 12th Annual Templeton Lecture on Religion and World Affairs: AMERICANISM VS. ISLAMISM: A PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE by Zuhdi Jasser My venturing into public discussions on the intersection between religion and politics is not something that I chose, but rather something I felt obliged to do after 9/11. Prior to then, I’d been dealing with many of the pathologies within the Muslim community, but as I began to see who was emerging as “spokespersons” for my faith after 9/11, I had to do something; hence the formation of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD). More than six years after 9/11, we’re starting to figure out that terrorism is just a tactic. The tactic has a goal, a mission, and a dream. Terrorism is simply a means to an end. The only way to defeat a tactic is either to defeat the source completely or to take away the dreams of the enablers. Those dreams, when they are wedded to religion, become the biggest liability for those of us who are embarrassed even talking about religion and politics. What greater incendiary mechanism could there be to manipulate Western society than to cover a fascistic dream in a faith that is a spiritual path for over a billion people? And what better way to insulate itself from criticism than to cover itself in a spiritual guise? Non-Muslim and Muslim alike, Americans, guided by the Constitution and First Amendment, have always been protective of our faith.
    [Show full text]
  • “Identifying the Enemy: Radical Islamist Terror”
    TESTIMONY for Hearing before: The House Committee on Homeland Security's Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency “Identifying the Enemy: Radical Islamist Terror” By Dr. M. ZUHDI JASSER PRESIDENT, AMERICAN ISLAMIC FORUM FOR DEMOCRACY September 22, 2016 Cannon House Office Building 331 Introduction: Thank you Chairman Perry and members of the House Committee on Homeland Security’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency for holding this very important hearing on “Identifying the Enemy: Radical Islamist Terror.” I am Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, President and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) based in Phoenix, Arizona. I am here today, because I could not feel more strongly that our current national and agency direction in combating Islamist inspired terrorism is deeply flawed and profoundly dangerous. As a devout Muslim who loves my faith, and loves my nation, the de-emphasis of “radical Islam” and the “Islamist” root cause of global Islamist terrorism is the greatest obstacle to both national harmony and national security. Wholesale denial of the truth by many in our government and political establishment has actually emboldened extremists on both sides of this debate: both radical Islamists and anti-Muslim fascists. Neither Islam nor Muslims are monolithic and should not be treated as such by anyone – much less our government and media. Please understand it is as equally foolhardy in counter-terrorism and counter-radicalization work to refuse to acknowledge the role of political Islam in the threat as it is to villainize the whole of Islam and all Muslims. The majority of Americans are smart enough to understand that to say the House of “Islam has no problems” is just as problematic as declaring that “Islam, and all Muslims, are the problem”.
    [Show full text]