Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling Sydney 2017 Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling Second edition prepared by: Peter Aumann and Tony Arnold Publisher Austroads Ltd. Second edition project manager: Gemma Kernich Level 9, 287 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Abstract Phone: +61 2 8265 3300 The Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling provides [email protected] guidance for designers and other practitioners on the design of paths for safe www.austroads.com.au and efficient walking and cycling, both within the road corridor and outside the road corridor. The guide provides information on considerations that should About Austroads be given in providing a path, describes the types of paths and covers the requirements of path users, e.g. operating spaces, factors that influence path Austroads is the peak organisation of Australasian locations, and geometric design criteria for a path and related facilities such road transport and traffic agencies. as intersections between paths, and terminal treatments. Detailed guidance is provided on path location, alignment, width, clearances, crossfall, drainage Austroads’ purpose is to support our member and sight distance requirements. organisations to deliver an improved Australasian road transport network. To succeed in this task, we The location and design of paths may be influenced by a range of aspects undertake leading-edge road and transport that need to be considered and facilities that need to be accommodated within research which underpins our input to policy roadsides. In particular, designers should refer to the Guide to Road Design: development and published guidance on the • Part 6: Roadside Design, Safety and Barriers (Austroads 2010a) design, construction and management of the road • Part 6B: Roadside Environment (Austroads 2015b). network and its associated infrastructure. The design of pedestrian and cyclist paths may also be influenced by design Austroads provides a collective approach that considerations and requirements covered in other parts of the Guide to Road delivers value for money, encourages shared Design. In addition, road designers should also refer to relevant parts of the knowledge and drives consistency for road users. Guide to Traffic Management in relation to traffic management devices and Austroads is governed by a Board consisting of requirements that may need to be accommodated within a roadside or may senior executive representatives from each of its otherwise influence the design. eleven member organisations: • Roads and Maritime Services New South Wales Keywords • Roads Corporation Victoria Planning, pedestrian paths, bicycle paths, shared paths, separated paths, path user requirements, operating space, location of paths, alignment, • Queensland Department of Transport and Main horizontal curvature, gradient, width, clearance, intersections, fences, terminal Roads treatments, bridges, culverts, bicycle safety audits. • Main Roads Western Australia • Department of Planning, Transport and Published: June 2017 Infrastructure South Australia • Department of State Growth Tasmania ISBN 978-1-925451-75-7 Pages 111 • Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Austroads Project No. TP1848 Logistics Northern Territory Austroads Publication No. AGRD06A-17 • Transport Canberra and City Services Directorate, Australian Capital Territory • Australian Government Department of © Austroads Ltd 2017 Infrastructure and Regional Development This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the • Australian Local Government Association Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the prior written permission of Austroads. • New Zealand Transport Agency. Second edition published June 2017 First edition published October 2009 The second edition has been restructured and contains editorial and technical changes. The title has been amended to better reflect the information on the functions and types of paths covered in this edition. Updated information and new information have been included with the key changes as follows: • Sections 1 to 4 has been reworded to provide generic information that is relevant for pedestrians and cyclists. • Section 1.1: Universal Access – additional information on providing universal access. • Sections 2.2: Pedestrian Path and 2.3: Bicycle Path – amended to include information on levels of service. • Section 3: Path User Considerations – amended to broaden the range of path user considerations. • Section 3.2.1: Pedestrians – amended to include information on mobility scooters. • Section 5.1: Width of Paths – additional information for path widths based on volumes. • Section 5.7: Sight Distance – additional commentary on pedestrian needs and sight distance and replacement of Figure 7.7 with an equation to determine stopping sight distance. • Section 6.5: Special Treatments for Intersections of Paths with Paths – new section consolidating treatments for special circumstances. • Section 7.3: Treatments for Intersections of Paths with Roads – new information on path terminal treatments. • Section 7.5: Special Treatments for Intersections of Paths with Roads – new section on terminal treatments for special circumstances. • Section 8.3: Culvert Underpasses – new information on principles in providing paths through culverts. • Appendix B: Speed Limiting Treatments – new appendix providing information on speed limiting treatments on paths. • Appendix C.3.1: Bituminous Surface Pavements – additional information on bituminous surfaces. • Appendix C.4: Life Cycle Costing – new section on life cycle costing. • Commentary 1: Planning and Need for a Path – transferred from Section 2 as information relates to network plans and operation. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the role and contribution of the Austroads Road Design Task Force in providing guidance and information during the preparation of this Part. The panel comprised the following members: Mr Peter Ellis - Roads and Maritime Services, New South Wales Mr Richard Fanning - Roads Corporation, Victoria Mr Mike Whitehead - Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads Mr Albert Wong - Main Roads Western Australia Mr William Moodie - Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Logistics Northern Territory Mr Ben McHugh - Transport Canberra and City Services Directorate Mr Tony Napoli - Australian Local Government Association Mr James Hughes - NZ Transport Agency Mr Tom Brock - Consult Australia Ms Gemma Kernich - Australian Bicycle Council Mr Michael Tziotis - ARRB Group Ltd The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the City of Sydney and City of Adelaide for providing photographs for this Part. This Guide is produced by Austroads as a general guide. Its application is discretionary. Road authorities may vary their practice according to local circumstances and policies. Austroads believes this publication to be correct at the time of printing and does not accept responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of information herein. Readers should rely on their own skill and judgement to apply information to particular issues. Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of this Part ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Safe System Approach ............................................................................................................................. 3 2. Types of Path .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Pedestrian Path ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Bicycle Path .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Shared Path .............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.5 Separated Path ......................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Path User Considerations ................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Operating Space ..................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Pedestrians ............................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Cyclists ....................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Definition of Footpath and Road Margin

    Definition of Footpath and Road Margin

    Meanings of “footpath” and “road margin” in Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004 The RURs provide the following definitions 1.6 Interpretation: footpath means a path or way principally designed for, and used by, pedestrians; and ​ includes a footbridge road margin includes any uncultivated margin of a road adjacent to but not forming part of ​ ​ ​ either the roadway or the footpath (if any) The definition of “footpath” encompasses the road space that is principally designed for and used by pedestrians. There is nothing in any of the rules that reference footpath that limits this to paved areas of the pedestrian space. The definition of “road margin” excludes any part of the footpath. The term is only used in RUR 6.2, 11.14 and 11.15. Both 11.14 and 11.15 refer to riders of horses. 11.14 requires horse riders to “when a reasonably adequate road margin is available, keep the animal on ​ the road margin as far as practicable”, but prohibits riding “along a footpath, or on any lawn, ​ ​ garden, or other cultivation adjacent to or forming part of a road”. These words suggest that ​ road margins do not exist on all roads. It appears that the term “road margin” only refers to ​ ​ areas set aside and formed for parking or stopping off the roadway References to “footpath” and “road margin” in other legislation Both terms appear with the same definitions in related legislation: the Land Transport (Offences and Penalties) Regulations 1999 (in a schedule of penalties for breaching rules in the RUR, and the Traffic Regulations 1976 (largely revoked and Replaced by the RUR).
  • Truly Spectacular!

    Truly Spectacular!

    Directions to Western Park Entrance Directions to Eastern Park Entrance Hiking Paths Observation Decks Sussex WESTERN PARK ENTRANCE Sussex Corner Fundy Trail All trail distances are one-way unless indicated with an * Accessible off trails within the parkway - may require a Parkway Easy Moderate Strenuous short hike Waterford St. Martins Hearst Lodge A Multi-Use Trail 10 km 1 Flowerpot Rock – 1 9 Sluiceway Observation Deck Alma Harbour 39 km Opening B Sea Captains’ Burial Ground Footpath 0.34 km 2 Flowerpot Rock – 2 10 Suspension Footbridge Sea Caves 2021 7 km H C Flowerpot Rock Scenic Footpath 1.5 km 3 Flowerpot Rock – 3 Observation Deck P9 I D 11 Interpretive Centre Bradshaw Scenic Footpath 0.6 km 4 Fuller Falls EASTERN PARK ENTRANCE Observation Deck E Pioneer Trail Loop * 0.48 km Observation Deck Fundy Trail Parkway 12 Tufts’ Plateau F Big Salmon River Loop * 1.2 km 5 Lighthouse Map Legend Lookouts Beaches G Suspension Footbridge Trail 0.39 km 13 Long Beach Observation Deck Easily accessed by driving James Catt Observation Deck 0 Beach 1 Melvin Beach L H 14 McCumber Brook 4 the parkway Monument 7 10 Hearst Lodge Scenic Footpath 2.7 km 6 Isle Haute EASTERN PARK Electric Vehicle Charge Station 2 Pangburn Beach I Cranberry Brook Loop * 4.8 km Observation Deck 1 1 Fox Rock Lookout Mitchell Franklin Bridge Observation Deck ENTRANCE S F Fundy Trail Parkway - 30 km 3 Big Salmon River Beach Suspension 6 J Big Salmon to Long Beach Footpath 4.4 km 15 McCumber Brook 2 Fownes Head Lookout 7 Waterfowl ROUTE TO (cars, buses, motorcycles) 4 Long Beach
  • Rulebook for Link Light Rail

    Rulebook for Link Light Rail

    RULEBOOK FOR LINK LIGHT RAIL EFFECTIVE MARCH 31 2018 RULEBOOK FOR LINK LIGHT RAIL Link Light Rail Rulebook Effective March 31, 2018 CONTENTS SAFETY ................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 3 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................20 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT GENERAL RULES ...............................................................20 1.1 APPLICABILITY OF RULEBOOK ............................................................................20 1.2 POSSESSION OF OPERATING RULEBOOK .........................................................20 1.3 RUN CARDS ...........................................................................................................20 1.4 REQUIRED ITEMS ..................................................................................................20 1.5 KNOWLEDGE OF RULES, PROCEDURES, TRAIN ORDERS, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTIVES, AND NOTICES .....................................................20
  • See Our Park Map of Water Bottle Refill Stations!

    See Our Park Map of Water Bottle Refill Stations!

    D V L B S Spotts Park O’Reilly St T Sawyer St H I E Snover St Snover Jackson Hill St Hill Jackson THEWATERWORKS H Zane and Brady Washington Glenwood N Memorial Way HOUSTONAVE SHEPHERDDR Cemetery Cemetery buffalo BAYO U EORIALDR Carruth Overlook Carruth STUDEONTST Bridge EORIALDR Green Tree to Sixth Ward Nature Area 0.40 M.D. Anderson Buffalo Bayou has been a focal point in Houston’s Foundation Stairway Cleveland Park Fonde history since the Allen brothers founded the city in 0.42 Rec. Center (weekends and evenings aer 1836. Today, the bayou is once again the centerpiece Houston Police Tapley 5pm only) Hamill Foundation Stairway Officers’ Memorial Tributary St Sabine of its development. Rosemont Bridge Rusk St » St. Thomas High School 0.18 Buffalo Bayou Partnership (BBP) is the non-profit organiza- 0.80 0.56 Shepherd Gateway Scurlock Foundation Overlook LDR ORIA Lee & Joe Jamail Hobby Center tion revitalizing and transforming Buffalo Bayou from a gi from the Radoff Family E Sabine Promenade Jackson Hill Bridge Skatepark Bridge Shepherd Drive to the Port of Houston Turning Basin. From to Memorial Park 0.39 Jane Gregory spearheading capital projects such as the 160-acre Buffalo EORIALDR Hobby 1.14 Garden Center 0.45 Bayou Park to constructing hike and bike trails, operating Neumann Family Barbara Fish Daniel comprehensive clean-up and maintenance programs and Wortham Foundation Stairway Nature Play Area Waugh Grove offering thoughtful programming, Buffalo Bayou Partnership Bat Colony ALLENPKWY Brookfield Bridge « Walker St is reclaiming Houston’s unique waterfront. JOHNNYSTEELE Federal Reserve Bank City Hall Bud Light Amphitheater Crosby McKinney St » Annex This map will guide you as you walk, run, cycle or paddle LOSTLAKE DOPARK Outfall ONTROSEBLVD TAFTST Gillette St Gillette ELEANORTINSLEYPARK Bagby St City along the waterway and visit the many parks and historic SHEPHERDDR WAUHDR Sam Houston Park Hall sites.
  • Footpath Or Bridleway Leaves a Metalled Road the Highway Above

    Footpath Or Bridleway Leaves a Metalled Road the Highway Above

    28 CH. 41 Countryside Act 1968 1967 c. 86. (9) Section 67 of the Countryside (Scotland) Act 1967 (grants to local authorities) shall have effect in relation to the expenditure of a local planning authority in Scotland in or in connection with paying compensation under this section as it has effect in relation to the expenditure mentioned in that section. Tree 26. In section 125(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act preservation orders: 1962, so far as it relates to tree preservation orders, and in compensation section 26(2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) under Act 1947 (both of which sections provide for compensation for Planning refusal of consent under tree preservation orders) for the words Acts. " damage or expenditure " there shall be substituted " loss or 1962 c. 38. damage ". 1947 c. 43. Public rights of way Signposting 27.-(1) A highway authority, after consultation with the of footpaths owner or occupier of the land concerned, shall have and bridle- power to ways. erect and maintain signposts along any footpath or bridleway for which they are the highway authority. (2) Subject to subsection (3) below, at every point where a footpath or bridleway leaves a metalled road the highway authority shall in exercise of their power under subsection (1) above erect and maintain a signpost- (a) indicating that the footpath or bridleway is a public footpath or bridleway, and (b) showing, so far as the highway authority consider convenient and appropriate, where the footpath or bridleway leads, and the distance to any place or places named on the signpost.
  • Circular Walk from Bury Knowle Park to the C. S. LEWIS NATURE

    Circular Walk from Bury Knowle Park to the C. S. LEWIS NATURE

    Circular walk from Bury Knowle Park to the C. S. LEWIS NATURE RESERVE in Risinghurst, and on up to SHOTOVER; then a restricted byway to HORSPATH, and back to Headington through fields to THE RIDINGS (under 5½ miles/8.8 km) Walking boots essential in the Horspath area after rainy periods (1) Bury Knowle Park in central Headington to Risinghurst Leave Bury Knowle Park via the main gate, turn left on to the London Road, and cross that road at the first pelican crossing (opposite St Andrew’s School). Continue a short way eastwards on the London Road, and then take the first turning on the right down Wharton Road. Take the second turning on the left into St Leonard’s Road. Take the first turning on the right into Holley Crescent, and when it curves right, turn left on to Vallis Alley, the footpath that starts between Nos. 22 and 20 Holley Crescent. (This is a remnant of the old funeral path that the people of Quarry used to take to get to St Andrew’s Church before their own parish church opened in 1849.) If the alley is crowded, it is possible to go into Margaret Road recreation ground on the right and get back out on to the path again just before the pavilion. Continue on Vallis Alley all the way to the end, then cross Quarry High Street and enter the footpath that is opposite (Chapel Alley). The former Quarry Methodist Chapel of 1860 is on your left. At the end of Chapel Alley turn left into Quarry Hollow, then take the first right into Quarry School Place, with Headington Quarry Nursery School (formerly Headington Quarry National School) on your right.
  • 9 Public Rights of Way 2 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2021/22

    9 Public Rights of Way 2 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2021/22

    Local Highway Panels Members’ Guide 9 Public Rights of Way 2 Local Highway Panels (LHP) Members Guide 2021/22 1. Introduction There are 6,320km of Public Rights of Way (PRoW) in Essex, which is one of the most extensive networks in the country. Although PRoW are the lowest category of highway, exactly the same legal principles apply as with all roads and footways: once a highway, always a highway; the status, width and position can only be altered by legal order. The Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way, together with a document called the Definitive Statement, lists the precise location of all PRoWs within Essex. The County Council is responsible for the maintenance and update of the Definitive Map and Definitive Statement. This is divided into Districts and Parishes, with each path being identified by a number which is unique to that Parish. Although the right of way itself is protected and accessible to all, in most cases the surrounding land and the sub-soil of the PRoW will usually be privately owned, and often working farmland. The landowner and possibly others may have private access rights, such as the right to use a tractor or other vehicle on a route. Types of Right of Way There are four types of right of way which have different access rights. Different coloured symbols are used to differentiate between the different types of highway. Footpaths Footpaths represent 84% of the total PRoW network. A footpath is a highway over which the public has a right of way on foot only.
  • Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure

    Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure

    Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Cover Photo: Rajendra Ravi, Institute for Democracy & Sustainability. Acknowledgements This Planning and Design guideline has been produced as part of the Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation (SSEF) sponsored project on Non-motorised Transport by the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. The project team at TRIPP, IIT Delhi, has worked closely with researchers from Innovative Transport Solutions (iTrans) Pvt. Ltd. and SGArchitects during the course of this project. We are thankful to all our project partners for detailed discussions on planning and design issues involving non-motorised transport: The Manual for Cycling Inclusive Urban Infrastructure Design in the Indian Subcontinent’ (2009) supported by Interface for Cycling Embassy under Bicycle Partnership Program which was funded by Sustainable Urban Mobility in Asia. The second document is Public Transport Accessibility Toolkit (2012) and the third one is the Urban Road Safety Audit (URSA) Toolkit supported by Institute of Urban Transport (IUT) provided the necessary background information for this document. We are thankful to Prof. Madhav Badami, Tom Godefrooij, Prof. Talat Munshi, Rajinder Ravi, Pradeep Sachdeva, Prasanna Desai, Ranjit Gadgil, Parth Shah and Dr. Girish Agrawal for reviewing an earlier version of this document and providing valuable comments. We thank all our colleagues at the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme for cooperation provided during the course of this study. Finally we would like to thank the transport team at Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation (SSEF) for providing the necessary support required for the completion of this document.
  • Independent Walk 3 All Saints Church to Rochester Esplanade and Castle

    Independent Walk 3 All Saints Church to Rochester Esplanade and Castle

    Independent Walk 3 All Saints Church to Rochester Esplanade and Castle (3.25 miles approx.) This route is published for independent walking in and around the parish of Frindbury with Upnor and Chattenden. The walk may be done in either direction (bearing in mind things often look different when done backwards). This delightful walk starts and ends outside All Saints parish hall on Church Green ME2 4HJ, but can be started at any safe point on the route. The walk is within the urban area, but offers superb views of the Medway River and the changing landscape of Strood Riverside. Rochester Bridge is quieter during the Coronavirus crisis but do still take care here. Health and Safety Advice Walking is very good for physical and mental well-being, but during the Coronavirus outbreak please ensure you follow this guidance: • We are allowed to walk locally once a day • Wash your hands thoroughly before and after the walk • You can walk with the other people in your household • Otherwise, walk on your own • Maintain a minimum distance of two metres (6 feet) between you and others at all times • Always cross the road where you can see, and be seen by, oncoming traffic, and only when it is safe to cross. This written route description is accompanied by a map of the route. The arrows on the map follow the directions below. The Route • The walk starts at the All Saints Church Frindsbury parish hall on Church Green, ME2 4HE. • Continue along Church Green to enter the churchyard of All Saints at the end of the road.
  • Highway Safety Act of 1973

    Highway Safety Act of 1973

    * * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 * (Section 214) Of T t ^. STATES Of a^ * MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY * ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 (Section 214) MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 CONTENTS Page SECTION I: SYNOPSIS A. Introduction .............................................. 1 B. Executive Summary ......................................... 2 C. Background .............................................. 4 D. Study Methodology ......................................... 7 E. Congressional Recommendations ................................ 12 SECTION II: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Introduction .............................................. 13 A. Review and Evaluation of State and Local Ordinances, Regulations, and Laws Pertaining to Pedestrian Safety .................................. 14 B. Review and Evaluation of Enforcement Policies, Procedures, Methods, Practices and Capabilities for Enforcing Pedestrian Rules ................ 35 C. Relationship Between Alcohol and Pedestrian Safety ................... 36 D. Evaluation of Ways and Means of Improving Pedestrian Safety Programs ...... 43 E. Analysis of Present Funding Allocation of Pedestrian Safety Programs and an Assessment of the Capabilities of Federal, State and Local Governments to Fund Such Activities and Programs .................... 45 F. Findings ................................................59
  • Rail Accident Report

    Rail Accident Report

    Rail Accident Report Fatal accident at Mexico footpath crossing (near Penzance) 3 October 2011 Report 10/2012 June 2012 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Fatal accident at Mexico footpath crossing (near Penzance), 3 October 2011 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The accident 7 Summary of the accident 7 Context 7 The sequence of events 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Acknowledgements 12 Key facts and analysis 13 Background information 13 Discounted factor 22 Identification of the immediate cause 25 Identification of causal
  • Level Crossings: a Guide for Managers, Designers and Operators Railway Safety Publication 7

    Level Crossings: a Guide for Managers, Designers and Operators Railway Safety Publication 7

    Level Crossings: A guide for managers, designers and operators Railway Safety Publication 7 December 2011 Contents Foreword 4 What is the purpose of this guide? 4 Who is this guide for? 4 Introduction 5 Why is managing level crossing risk important? 5 What is ORR’s policy on level crossings? 5 1. The legal framework 6 Overview 6 Highways and planning law 7 2. Managing risks at level crossings 9 Introduction 9 Level crossing types – basic protection and warning arrangements 12 General guidance 15 Gated crossings operated by railway staff 16 Barrier crossings operated by railway staff 17 Barrier crossings with obstacle detection 19 Automatic half barrier crossings (AHBC) 21 Automatic barrier crossings locally monitored (ABCL) 23 Automatic open crossings locally monitored (AOCL) 25 Open crossings 28 User worked crossings (UWCs) for vehicles 29 Footpath and bridleway crossings 30 Foot crossings at stations 32 Provision for pedestrians at public vehicular crossings 32 Additional measures to protect against trespass 35 The crossing 36 Gates, wicket gates and barrier equipment 39 Telephones and telephone signs 41 Miniature stop lights (MSL) 43 Traffic signals, traffic signs and road markings 44 3. Level crossing order submissions 61 Overview and introduction 61 Office of Rail Regulation | December 2011 | Level crossings: a guide for managers, designers and operators 2 Background and other information on level crossing management 61 Level crossing orders: scope, content and format 62 Level crossing order request and consideration process 64 Information