DOCSLIB.ORG

Protocols and Tips in Protein Purification F2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protocols and Tips in Protein Purification F2 Protocols and tips in protein purification or How to purify protein in one day Contents I. Introduction 4 II. General sequence of protein purification procedures 5 Preparation of equipment and reagents 6 Preparation of the stock solutions 7 Preparation of the chromatographic columns 8 Preparation of crude extract (cell free extract or 9 soluble proteins fraction) Pre chromatographic steps 10 Chromatographic steps 11 III. “Common sense” strategy in protein purification 18 General principles and tips in “common sense” strategy 19 Algorithm for development of purification protocol for soluble over expressed protein 22 Brief scheme of purification of soluble protein 29 Timing for refined purification protocol of soluble over -expressed protein 30 DNA-binding proteins 31 IV. Protocols 33 Preparation of the stock solutions 34 Quick and effective cell disruption and preparation of the crude extract 35 Protamin sulphate (PS) treatment 36 Analytical ammonium sulphate cut (AM cut) 36 Preparative ammonium sulphate cut 37 Precipitation of proteins by ammonium sulphate 37 Recovery of protein from the ammonium sulphate precipitate 38 Preparation of samples for analysis of solubility of expression 38 Bio-Rad protein assay Sveta’s easy protocol 40 Protocol for accurate determination of concentration of pure protein 41 SDS PAGE Sveta’s easy protocol 42 V. Charts and Tables 43 Ammonium sulphate –Sugar refractometer 44 NaCl-Sugar refractometer 45 Calibration plot at various salt concentrations for Superdex200 GL column 46 Calibration plot for Hi-load Superdex 200 column 47 Ammonium sulphate table 48 VI. Appendix 49 Determination of protein concentration 50 How to concentrate proteins 54 How to store proteins 58 Time saving tips 59 Golden rules in protein purification 60 Contact details 60 2 Abbreviations AA acrylamide AS ammonium sulphate CBV column bed volume CE crude extract CM carboxymethyl DEAE diethylaminoethyl DTT dithiothreitol EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid FF fast flow HEPES N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-(2-ethanesulfonic acid) HIC hydrophobic interaction chromatography IEC ion exchange chromatography MES 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid MW molecular weight MWCO molecular weight cut off PS protamine sulphate PSA ammonium persulphate PAGE polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Q quaternary ammonium S methyl sulphanate SDS sodium dodecyl sulphate SEC size exlusive chromatography or gel filtration SP sulphopropyl TEMED N,N,N',N' tetramethylethylenediamine TP target protein UV ultraviolet 3 I. Introduction Why do we need to purify protein in one day? After 25 years and 180 proteins it has become clear to me that for some proteins even one extra day under conditions normally used for protein purification can detrimentally affect their activity and crystallisation ability. Whilst the majority of proteins can survive long purification and can be kept and stored at 4ºC for days and even weeks with little loss in activity, it does them no harm to be purified in one day either. To achieve the goal of complete protein purification in one day you should move fast and choose appropriate protocols, avoiding long procedures such as dialysis, long centrifugations and slow chromatography. Below are some protocols and tips which help me to achieve this goal. My approach is based on classical chromatography for natively (no tags) over- expressed proteins. Nowadays the high throughput approach dictates increasing use of tags in protein purification and sometimes classical methods are considered to be out of fashion. This is not the case. Very often tagged proteins cannot be purified to desirable purity by using just one tag affinity chromatography and second purification step is required anyway. In many cases the protein cannot be expressed and correctly folded with the tag attached, so expression of a native protein is still required. My approach does not differ much from tagged purification with respect to time, especially if tag removal is necessary. Please note that this brochure is not a complete guide to protein purification and you should still read serious books on the theory of chromatography to become familiar with the subject. 4 II. General sequence of protein purification procedures 5 Preparation of equipment and reagents For protein purification you need the equipment and reagents listed below: Sonicator or French Press Centrifuge, medium speed (30-70Kg) (e.g. J-20, Avanti J-25), Appropriate centrifugation tubes Chromatographic system comprising of, as a minimum, pump and fraction collector (normally system also includes UV monitor and recorder) Gradient mixer Spare pump or second chromatographic system Chromatographic columns packed with different types of matrixes Spectrophotometer VIS (340-800nm) or UV/VIS (190-800nm) Bio-Rad Protein Assay Reagent and Plastic cuvettes 1.6 ml Stock solutions of buffer components Concentrators (VivaSpin 20 and 6, microcone) and low speed refrigerated centrifuge Filter Device such as Filter Holder or Stericup Filter Unit. Apparatus and solutions for SDS-PAGE Refractometer (a pocket one for sucrose is fine) Pippetors, tips, eppendorf tubes, tubes for fraction collector 6 Preparation of the stock solutions It is very convenient to have stock solutions of the main salts and buffers used during purification. Use of the correctly and carefully prepared stock solutions can noticeably improve accuracy and reproducibility of the purification procedures. By having stock solutions you can prepare any buffer for protein purification in seconds. Simply pour required volumes of stock solutions in to a Duran bottle and adjust the volume with ultra pure water to the top mark on the bottle. For example, to prepare buffer 50mM tris pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 2mM EDTA: pour 50 ml of 1M tris, 20 ml of 5M NaCl and 10 ml of 0.2M EDTA in to a 1 litre bottle and add ultra pure water to 1 litre mark. The most useful stock solutions in protein purification are: 5M NaCl, 4 M (NH4)2SO4, 1M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Other stock solutions: You may need EDTA stock solution. Due to low solubility of this compound concentration of stock solution is 0.2M - 0.25M. You should adjust pH of the solution to 6.5 - 7 with 5M NaOH before you adjust it to required volume. You may also need: 1M HEPES-NaOH pH 7.0 or 7.5 1M MES-NaOH pH 6.0 or 6.5 Those buffers belong to so called "Good’s buffers". Unlike tris buffer they are not temperature sensitive so there is no need to control temperature during their preparation (see Protocols section). It is best to keep stocks of buffers in the fridge. Preparation of 1M Tris-HCl pH 8.0 To prepare this solution you need to adjust the pH to 8.0 with concentrated HCl. The problem here is that tris buffer is temperature sensitive. Raising the temperature by three degrees makes pH fall by 0.1. A lot of heat is produced during titration of 1M Tris solution with the concentrated acid so to make reproducible stock solution you need to titrate it on a water-ice bath with a thermometer placed in the solution. The standard temperature is 20oC, so you should make pH 8.0 at 20oC. Titration should be performed before you adjust volume. Because a significant volume of concentrated HCl is required to adjust pH, tris powder should be dissolved in 60-70% of the final volume of solution. Please note that dilution leads to a decrease in buffer pH. Normally we use 50 mM solution for purification (made from the 1M stock) and the actual pH for tris, MES or HEPES buffer is about 0.3 pH units lower then in 1M buffer. For 50mM tris buffer prepared from 1M stock pH 8.0 actual pH at 20oC is about 7.7. However if we use it at 4oC the pH is at about 8. When preparing stock solutions the sequence of procedure is as follow: Weighing powder – dissolving it in water – titration (for buffers and EDTA only) – adjusting volume - filtration (see Protocols section for details) 7 Preparation of the chromatographic columns For the basic purification protocol you need a set of 3 columns packed with DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow (weak anion exchanger) Phenyl-Toyopearl 630S (hydrophobic matrix) Superdex-200 (gel filtration) The additional set includes: Q-Sepharose Fast Flow (strong anion exchanger) CM-Sepharose fast flow (weak cation exchanger) DEAE-Toyopearl 650S ( weak anion exchanger) SP-Toyopearl 650S (strong cation exchanger) Butyl-Toyopearl 650S (strong hydrophobic matrix) Ethyl-Toyopearl 650S (weak hydrophobic matrix) Heparin-Sepharose Fast Flow (pseudo-affinity) Sets of HPLC (FPLC) columns (if you possess the appropriate system) You may need other types of matrices, such as Hydroxylapatite, Dye matrix, etc. You can buy ready-made columns from GE Healthcare (formerly Amersham) or Bio-Rad. For our scale we need columns 10-30 ml in size. We prefer to buy empty columns and pack them in the lab as this is cheaper and makes them re-packable. In the lab we mainly use Amersham –Pharmacia (GE Healthcare) empty columns C10/10, C10/20, C16/20 and XK16/20 with adapters. To prepare any column (except the gel filtration one): Check that all parts of column are in place (according to specification) Fix empty column on a stand in vertical position Fill bottom outlet with a few ml of ultra pure water Prepare slurry of any matrix taking 1 part sediment matrix and two parts water, warm to room temperature if matrix has been kept in the fridge. De-gassing under vacuum is useful but not overly crucial. Having the bottom outlet of column open, pour the slurry into the column, adding the slurry portion by portion, the matrix should settle at the bottom of the column and the water should run through. When all matrix is in the column continue to add water until matrix has settled, then close the bottom outlet of the column.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Van Der Waals Theory of Precipitation for Solutions of Binary Globular-Protein Mixtures
    LBNL-42043 Preprint ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY van der Waals Theory of Precipitation ,, for Solutions of Binary Globular­ Protein Mixtures t I Toshiaki Hino and John M. Prausnitz Chemical Sciences Division July 1998 Submitted to AIChE]ournal • ~:~:."?~';.f;.!.~~:~:::-::" ~:-::'!~ ~ •... ~- ... .. ..........~·.••..., .................... ·. --, ---I I I r Illz r: I .::. N lSI .::. w J ' - - DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain conect information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any wananty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California. LBNL-42043 van der Waals Theory of Precipitation for Solutions of Binary Globular-Protein Mixtures Toshiaki Hino and John M. Prausnitz Department of Chemical Engineering University of California and Chemical Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. July 1998 This work was supported by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences Division of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PURIFICATION of RECOMBINANT PROTEINS By
    PURIFICATION OF RECOMBINANT PROTEINS by GEORGE CLIFFORD RUTT B.S., University of Arizona (1985) M.A., University of Alaska (1988) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY December, 1996 ' " = e of Author '7.•- /-• ..... ------- T-------- !Departm'et of Chemical Engineering December 16, 1996 by YChesis Supervisor A. I by --------------------------------------- Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students APR 238 1997 ABSTRACT This project involved the design of a scaled-up process for the purification of a novel class of recombinant proteins, silk-elastin like proteins (SELP), which are block copolymers of the repeat amino acid sequence of silk (GAGAGS) and elastin (GVGVP). To facilitate process development, an HPLC assay for SELP was developed utilizing hydrophobic interaction chromatography which is less tedious and more quantitative then the existing assay. The purification protocol consists of flocculating cellular debris and anionic impurities, including nucleic acids, with a cationic polymer, followed by two sequential ammonium sulfate precipitations. This results in a 99.+ % purity of the SELP biopolymer. Two polymers, polyethyleneimine (PEI), and poly(dimethyldiallyl ammonium chloride) (PDMDAAC), were studied for impurity removal and flocculation properties. Optimal impurity removal correlated with optimal settling, and were found to be a function of pH and polymer concentration. The optimal condition for flocculation by PEI was found to be at a pH between 8 and 9, and a PEI concentration of 0.4 wt/vol % for lysate produced from 50 g/L dcw cells. PDMDAAC was determined to have significantly improved impurity removal and particulate settling characteristics at pH values above 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Precipitation Using Ammonium Sulfate
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Curr Protoc Manuscript Author Protein Sci. Manuscript Author Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 April 01. Published in final edited form as: Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2001 May ; APPENDIX 3: Appendix–3F. doi:10.1002/0471140864.psa03fs13. Protein Precipitation Using Ammonium Sulfate Paul T. Wingfield Protein Expression Laboratory (HNB-27), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) - NIH, Bldg 6B, Room 1B130, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda MD 20814, Tel: 301-594-1313 Paul T. Wingfield: [email protected] Abstract The basic theory of protein precipitation by addition of ammonium sulfate is presented and the most common applications are listed, Tables are provided for calculating the appropriate amount of ammonium sulfate to add to a particular protein solution. Key terms for indexing Ammonium sulfate; ammonium sulfate tables; protein concentration; protein purification BASIC THEORY The solubility of globular proteins increases upon the addition of salt (<0.15 M), an effect termed salting-in. At higher salt concentrations, protein solubility usually decreases, leading to precipitation; this effect is termed salting-out ((Green and Hughes, 1955). Salts that reduce the solubility of proteins also tend to enhance the stability of the native conformation. In contrast, salting-in ions are usually denaturants. The mechanism of salting-out is based on preferential solvation due to exclusion of the cosolvent (salt) from the layer of water closely associated with the surface of the protein (hydration layer). The hydration layer, typically 0.3 to 0.4 g water per gram protein (Rupley et al., 1983), plays a critical role in maintaining solubility and the correctly folded native conformation.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHANOL PRECIPITATION of GLYCOSYL HYDROLASES PRODUCED by Trichoderma Harzianum P49P11
    Brazilian Journal of Chemical ISSN 0104-6632 Printed in Brazil Engineering www.abeq.org.br/bjche Vol. 32, No. 02, pp. 325 - 333, April - June, 2015 dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20150322s00003268 ETHANOL PRECIPITATION OF GLYCOSYL HYDROLASES PRODUCED BY Trichoderma harzianum P49P11 M. A. Mariño1,2, S. Freitas2 and E. A. Miranda1,2* 1Department of Materials and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Unicamp, FEQ, Av. Albert Einstein 500, CEP: 13083-852, Campinas - SP, Brazil. Phone: + (55) (19) 3521 3918 E-mail: [email protected] 2Brazilian Bioethanol Science and Technology Laboratory (CTBE), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials, Campinas - SP, Brazil. (Submitted: February 6, 2014 ; Revised: May 13, 2014 ; Accepted: June 18, 2014) Abstract - This study aimed to concentrate glycosyl hydrolases produced by Trichoderma harzianum P49P11 by ethanol precipitation. The variables tested besides ethanol concentration were temperature and pH. The precipitation with 90% (v/v) ethanol at pH 5.0 recovered more than 98% of the xylanase activity, regardless of the temperature (5.0, 15.0, or 25.0 °C). The maximum recovery of cellulase activity as FPase was 77% by precipitation carried out at this same pH and ethanol concentration but at 5.0 °C. Therefore, ethanol precipitation can be considered to be an efficient technique for xylanase concentration and, to a certain extent, also for the cellulase complex. Keywords: Trichoderma harzianum; Glycosyl hydrolases; Ethanol precipitation. INTRODUCTION trated or dilute acid, generates toxic substances such as furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and pheno- Lignocellulosic biomass is a renewable raw mate- lics from lignin degradation (Badger, 2002; Brodeur rial with great potential as a source of clean energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Separation of Proteins Using Stimuli-Responsive Polymers
    SELECTIVE SEPARATION OF PROTEINS USING STIMULI-RESPONSIVE POLYMERS IN AN AQUEOUS SYSTEM A Thesis by JECORI SHANA JOHNSON Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Carmen Gomes Co-Chair of Committee, Zivko Nikolov Committee Member, Stephen Talcott Head of Department, Stephen Searcy May 2018 Major Subject: Biological and Agricultural Engineering Copyright 2018 Jecori Johnson ABSTRACT Biopolymers provide an option for protein purification and are being used due to their biodegradability, cost efficiency, non-toxicity and abundance in nature. This study investigated the use of natural and synthetic polymers for the flocculation of proteins by evaluating two bioprocesses: polyelectrolyte precipitation and inverse transition cycling. The effectiveness of chitosan (CHI, pKa= 6.5), polyetheleneimine (PEI, pKa= 11), sodium alginate (ALG, pKa= 3.2), and poly-N-isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAAm, lower critical solution temperature= 32 oC) were evaluated as flocculating agents of two model proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA, pI=4.5, acidic protein) and lysozyme (LYZ, pI= 11, basic protein). Natural polymers, CHI and ALG have an advantage due to their stimuli-responsive characteristic and also because they are positively or negatively charged at certain pH values, while PNIPAAm, a synthetic polymer, is sensitive to temperature. Briefly, protein and polymer were mixed at pH values where charges (if applicable) were complementary, ideally triggering flocculation by electrostatic interactions. The maximum precipitation yield achieved by polyelectrolyte precipitation resulted from the flocculation of LYZ using ALG at 87%. Our model system included the use of PEI as a flocculant for BSA.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Biological Macromolecule Crystallization
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11643-11691; doi:10.3390/ijms140611643 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review An Overview of Biological Macromolecule Crystallization Irene Russo Krauss 1, Antonello Merlino 1,2, Alessandro Vergara 1,2 and Filomena Sica 1,2,* 1 Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, Via Cintia, Napoli I-80126, Italy; E-Mails: [email protected] (I.R.K.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (A.V.) 2 Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages, C.N.R, Via Mezzocannone 16, Napoli I-80134, Italy * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-81-674-479; Fax: +39-81-674-090. Received: 26 March 2013; in revised form: 8 May 2013 / Accepted: 20 May 2013 / Published: 31 May 2013 Abstract: The elucidation of the three dimensional structure of biological macromolecules has provided an important contribution to our current understanding of many basic mechanisms involved in life processes. This enormous impact largely results from the ability of X-ray crystallography to provide accurate structural details at atomic resolution that are a prerequisite for a deeper insight on the way in which bio-macromolecules interact with each other to build up supramolecular nano-machines capable of performing specialized biological functions. With the advent of high-energy synchrotron sources and the development of sophisticated software to solve X-ray and neutron crystal structures of large molecules, the crystallization step has become even more the bottleneck of a successful structure determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicken Cathelicidins: Tissue Expression
    CHICKEN CATHELICIDINS: TISSUE EXPRESSION, DEVELOPMENTAL REGULATION, AND MASS SPECTROMETRIC QUANTIFICATION By MALLIKA ACHANTA BACHELOR OF VETERINARY SCIENCE AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2007 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2010 CHICKEN CATHELICIDINS: TISSUE EXPRESSION, DEVELOPMENTAL REGULATION AND MASS SPECTROMETRIC QUANTIFICATION Thesis Approved: Dr. Guolong Zhang Thesis Adviser Dr. Steve Hartson Dr. Lara Maxwell Dr. Mark E. Payton Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to my major advisor, Dr. Glenn Zhang, for recognizing my capabilities and giving me an opportunity to join his research team, and to work on this project. Thank you, Dr. Zhang, for letting me work at my pace, and for being patient during times when I am slow at making progress. Thank you, Dr. Zhang, for your excellent mentorship! I owe my deepest gratitude to Dr. Steve Hartson, Director, Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, whose encouragement, guidance and support have helped me in understanding the intricacies of mass spectrometry. Dr. Hartson is one of the best teachers in my life. Thank you Dr. Harston, for your financial assistantship through George R. Waller mass spectrometry fellowship. I would like to thank Dr. Lara Maxwell for her immense help in analyzing the data for my study. I am very much grateful to Dr. Yugendar Reddy Bommineni for introducing, recommending me to this wonderful lab and for his constant guidance. I sincerely thank my friend, Dr. Hari Addagarla, for his constant guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Factors Affecting Opalescence and Phase Separation in Protein Solutions Ashlesha S
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 3-30-2015 Investigation of Factors Affecting Opalescence and Phase Separation in Protein Solutions Ashlesha S. Raut University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Raut, Ashlesha S., "Investigation of Factors Affecting Opalescence and Phase Separation in Protein Solutions" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 681. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/681 Investigation of Factors Affecting Opalescence and Phase Separation in Protein Solutions Ashlesha Shirish Raut University of Connecticut, 2015 Abstract Opalescence and liquid-liquid phase separation reduce physical stability of a therapeutic protein formulation and have been recently reported for high concentration monoclonal antibody solutions. Liquid-liquid phase separation resulting in opalescence can be attributed to attractive intermolecular interactions; formulation factors that mitigate these interactions reduce solution opalescence and tendency to phase separate. Protein-protein interactions in solution have also been reported to enhance reversible/irreversible aggregation and viscosity of the solution. These formulation challenges are further enhanced for the second generation of antibodies due to the increased complexity of the molecules. Current work focuses on understanding the formulation factors and nature of intermolecular interactions that result in opalescence and liquid-liquid phase separation for monoclonal antibody (mAb) and Dual variable domain immunoglobulin antibody (DVD-IgTM) protein solutions. Opalescence for protein solution was measured as a function of formulation factors and correlated to interactions in dilute and concentrated solutions. Results show that presence of attractive interactions (enthalpy effect) and strong temperature dependence (entropy effect) result in liquid-liquid phase separation in solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Molecular Understanding of Protein Solubility: Increased Negative Surface Charge Correlates with Increased Solubility
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Biophysical Journal Volume 102 April 2012 1907–1915 1907 Toward a Molecular Understanding of Protein Solubility: Increased Negative Surface Charge Correlates with Increased Solubility Ryan M. Kramer,† Varad R. Shende,§ Nicole Motl,† C. Nick Pace,†‡ and J. Martin Scholtz†‡* †Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and ‡Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; and §Department of Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany ABSTRACT Protein solubility is a problem for many protein chemists, including structural biologists and developers of protein pharmaceuticals. Knowledge about how intrinsic factors influence solubility is limited due to the difficulty of obtaining quantitative solubility measurements. Solubility measurements in buffer alone are difficult to reproduce, because gels or supersaturated solutions often form, making it impossible to determine solubility values for many proteins. Protein precipitants can be used to obtain comparative solubility measurements and, in some cases, estimations of solubility in buffer alone. Protein precipitants fall into three broad classes: salts, long-chain polymers, and organic solvents. Here, we compare the use of representatives from two classes of precipitants, ammonium sulfate and polyethylene glycol 8000, by measuring the solubility of seven proteins. We find that increased negative surface charge correlates strongly with increased protein solubility and may be due to strong binding of water by the acidic amino acids. We also find that the solubility results obtained for the two different precipitants agree closely with each other, suggesting that the two precipitants probe similar properties that are relevant to solubility in buffer alone.
    [Show full text]
  • NMR-Based Metabolic Profiling: Methods and Application in Cancer
    NMR-Based Metabolic Profiling: Methods and Application in Cancer Biomarker Discovery by Wencheng Ge A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Chemistry) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy, Chair Professor Zhan Chen Professor Ari Gafni Professor Michael D. Morris © Wencheng Ge 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Professor Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy for his guidance and advice throughout my graduate studies. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. Bagganahalli Somashekar, Dr. Neil MacKinnon and Dr. Pratima Tripathi for their suggestions and help in my research. They continually discussed with me about how to improve my research and encourage me to pull me through the difficulties. In addition, I want to thank Dr. Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran for giving me exciting projects related to prostate cancer research. His suggestions have always enlightened me and helped me to think in different perspectives. Thanks to my committee members, Professor Michael Morris, Professor Ari Gafni and Professor Zhan Chen for their thoughtful input and encouragement. Their support has continuously motivated me in my research. I would like to thank my friends here in Ann Arbor, especially Jing Lu for sharing ideas in statistics with me. Also, many thanks to my wonderful family for their support and patience. Lastly, I’m grateful to my brother Zicheng Ge and Branden DeRoche for their dedication. They bring sunshine to
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Protein Precipitation for High-Loading Drug Delivery Systems for Immunotherapeutics †
    Proceedings Optimization of Protein Precipitation for High-Loading Drug Delivery Systems for Immunotherapeutics † Levi Collin Nelemans 1,2,*, Matej Buzgo 1 and Aiva Simaite 1 1 InoCure s.r.o., R&D Lab, Prumyslová 1960, 250 88 Celákovice, Czech Republic; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (A.S.) 2 Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Pharmaceutics, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecp2020.sciforum.net/. Abstract: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world and is often untreatable. Protein- based therapeutics, such as immunotherapeutics, show promising results in the fight against cancer, resulting in their market share increasing every year. Unfortunately, most protein-based therapeu- tics suffer from fast degradation in the blood, making effective treatment expensive, causing more off-target effects (due to the high doses necessary), and often require repeated injections to stay within the correct therapeutic range. Encapsulation of these proteins inside nanocarriers is prompted to overcome these problems by enhancing targeted drug delivery and, thus, leading to a less frequent administration and lower required dose. However, most current protein encapsulation methods show very low loading capacities (LC). This leads to even more expensive treatments and might pose a further risk for the patient caused by systemic toxicity against high concentrations of the carrier material. We investigated and optimized protein nanoprecipitation as a method to obtain a high protein LC and encapsulation efficiency (EE) inside poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid; PLGA) na- noparticles via a simple two-step process.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Kinetically Irreversible Protein Aggregate Structure
    1 274 Biophysical Journal Volume 66 May 1994 1274-1289 Simulations of Kinetically Irreversible Protein Aggregate Structure Sugunakar Y. Patro and Todd M. Przybycien Bioseparations Research Center, Howard P. Isermann Department of Chemical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590 USA ABSTRACT We have simulated the structure of kinetically irreversible protein aggregates in two-dimensional space using a lattice-based Monte-Carlo routine. Our model specifically accounts for the intermolecular interactions between hydrophobic and hydrophilic protein surfaces and a polar solvent. The simulations provide information about the aggregate density, the types of inter-monomer contacts and solvent content within the aggregates, the type and extent of solvent exposed perimeter, and the short- and long-range order all as a function of (i) the extent of monomer hydrophobic surface area and its distribution on the model protein surface and (ii) the magnitude of the hydrophobic-hydrophobic contact energy. An increase in the extent of monomer hydrophobic surface area resulted in increased aggregate densities with concomitant decreased system free energies. These effects are accompanied by increases in the number of hydrophobic-hydrophobic contacts and decreases in the solvent- exposed hydrophobic surface area of the aggregates. Grouping monomer hydrophobic surfaces in a single contiguous stretch resulted in lower aggregate densities and lower short range order. More favorable hydrophobic-hydrophobic contact energies produced structures with higher densities but the number of unfavorable protein-protein contacts was also observed to increase; greater configurational entropy produced the opposite effect. Properties predicted by our model are in good qualitative agree- ment with available experimental observations.
    [Show full text]