DOCSLIB.ORG

'Inside Out' 627.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Inside Out' 627.Pdf Miscarriages of JusticeUK (MOJUK) 22 Berners St, Birmingham B19 2DR story, to understand why she is now serving a minimum of 15 years. Woffinden believes that Tele: 0121- 507 0844 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mojuk.org.uk all ten suspects should not have been convicted but he tells their stories in enough detail for one to understand why they were. Each tale unfolds like an intriguing television drama, with MOJUK: Newsletter ‘Inside Out’ No 627 (16/03/2015) - Cost £1 our judgements and preconceptions of innocence or guilt tugged both ways. Woffinden has ploughed an increasingly lonely furrow on the subject, following in the footsteps of Rough Justice: Who is Looking Out For the Wrongfully Convicted? two other campaigning authors. The first was Ludovic Kennedy, whose book 10 Rillington Place, Duncan Campbell: The letter from Whitemoor Prison in Cambridgeshire was in poor English published in 1961, exposed the wrongful hanging of Timothy Evans. The second was Paul Foot, who but its message was clear. The writer claimed he was serving a life sentence for a murder that campaigned relentlessly in Private Eye, the Daily Mirror and in books on many cases, including that he had not committed. What was also clear was that this was no ordinary case. Not only was of the Bridgewater Four, convicted of the murder of a newspaper boy, Carl Bridgewater, in 1978. the victim a respected author and photographer who lived in one of the most expensive streets Woffinden produced a volume called Miscarriages of Justice in 1987, and in 2015 he published Bad in London, but his alleged killer was the grandson of Chairman Mao’s third-in-command and Show, in which he suggests that Major Charles Ingram, convicted of rigging the TV quiz show Who an informant for MI6 whose entire defence at his Old Bailey trial had been heard in secret, Wants to Be a Millionaire? by placing allies in the audience who coughed strategically, was innocent. with reporters excluded from the court. It took some weeks to unravel the story of Wang Yam, What is striking about Woffinden’s latest volume, however, is his criticism of the media on three who was convicted of the murder of Allan Chappelow at his home in Hampstead in 2006. counts. “It is not merely that the media fails to draw attention to wrongful convictions when they occur; Wang had supposedly broken in to Chappelow’s letter box at his front gate to steal bank it is not just that trials leading to these injustices are misleadingly reported; it is that, in some details and, according to the prosecution, probably killed him when confronted. The victim’s instances, the media itself has played a key role in bringing about the wrongful conviction,” he writes. body was discovered several days later. For over two centuries, the media have been crucial to both freeing and convicting innocent In his letter, Wang claimed that because the press had been barred from reporting his suspects in murder cases. In 1815 Eliza Fenning, a household cook, appeared at the Old defence he had not received a fair trial. With my colleague Richard Norton-Taylor, I wrote a Bailey, charged with attempting to poison her employers with arsenic in their steak and story about the case that appeared in the Guardian in January 2014. Shortly afterwards, a for - dumplings. It was suggested that she had done so after being scolded for consorting with mer close neighbour of Chappelow contacted us to say that, after Wang was already in cus - young male apprentices. She protested her innocence and a radical writer, William Hone, took tody, someone had tried to break into his letter box, too, and that the intruder, when discov - up her case, visited her in Newgate Prison and launched a newspaper, the Traveller, to fight ered, had threatened to kill him and his family. In April, the Criminal Cases Review for her release. It probably did no harm to her cause that she was young and beautiful; the Commission announced that, as a result of this fresh evidence, the case was going back to artist Robert Cruikshank drew her reading the Bible in her cell. It was all to no avail: Fenning the Court of Appeal. It is now expected to be heard soon. Even though no murder trial had was hanged. And yet, ever since, writers and journalists have taken up such cases. ever been heard in such secrecy at the Old Bailey before or since, the media largely ignored Arthur Conan Doyle campaigned in the Daily Telegraph for George Edalji, convicted on the bizarre the story. Tales of alleged miscarriage of justice don’t make many waves these days. charge of disembowelling a horse in Staffordshire in 1903. Edalji, an Anglo-Indian solicitor, served As it happens, Wang Yam’s referral to the Appeal Court came just as a large book entitled three years’ hard labour but was eventually pardoned and concern about his conviction led partly to The Nicholas Cases arrived in my mail. It is by Bob Woffinden and the slightly obscure title is the creation in 1907 of the Court of Criminal Appeal. (Julian Barnes’s book Arthur & George is based a reference to St Nicholas, better known as Santa Claus, who in early Byzantine times halted on the case.) Conan Doyle, too, was active in the campaign to prove the innocence of Oscar Slater, the execution of three innocent men and could thus claim to be the patron saint of the wrong - a German Jew convicted of the murder in Glasgow in 1908 of Marion Gilchrist, a wealthy, elderly sin - fully convicted. And, boy, do they need a saint these days. The author takes ten cases, intro - gle woman. Class and anti-Jewish prejudice clearly played a part in the police investigation, and the duces us to the accused, tells their stories and shares the frustration of the convicted men and initial press coverage of the campaign to free him was dismissive. “Efforts most harmful and ill- women as well as their lawyers and families. advised are being made to work up popular feeling and to receive signatures with the object of Some of the cases may be familiar. Jonathan King, the former singer and music entrepre - obtaining a reprieve,” the Scotsman sniffed. “However amiable may be the sentiments that may have neur, was sentenced to seven years in 2001 for sexual offences against boys aged 14 and 15. prompted some of those who have taken part in the movement, it is one that cannot be otherwise What is less well known is that he was convicted not of offences relating to his original arrest, than mischievous and futile.” It took nearly two decades to prove Slater’s innocence. Scottish jour - but of others that came to light as a result of the media publicity surrounding his case. Another nalists played an important part in keeping the story alive. case is that of Gordon Park, convicted of the murder of his wife, Carol, who disappeared in Yet for many years there remained the feeling that such miscarriages of justice were very 1976 and whose body was found in Coniston Water in the Lake District in August 1997 (the few. Those who sought to question convictions in contentious cases were often mocked, as media named it the “Lady in the Lake trial”). Park was convicted in January 2005. He hanged was the case when the earliest doubts were expressed about the guilt of the Birmingham Six. himself in prison and in despair in January 2010. “Loony MP backs bomb gang” was the headline in the Sun when the Labour politician and jour - Other cases, such as that of Emma Bates, received less press coverage. In 2009 Bates was nalist Chris Mullin challenged their conviction. But with the vindication of the Birmingham Six, convicted of the murder of her violent and abusive ex-partner Wayne Hill in Birmingham. She the Guildford Four, the Maguire Seven and suspects in other so-called “Irish cases”, there was killed Hill with a single stab wound in a confrontation at her home, and it is hard, reading her finally a recognition that something was very rotten in the justice system. There followed a flowering of investigations into dubious cases. In 1982, the BBC media. launched the TV series Rough Justice, which carried out investigations over the next quarter- Not everyone who claims to be innocent is telling the truth, especially if the crime is especially century. Some of its journalists went on to found Trial and Error, which did the same for heinous. One case which received much publicity was that of Simon Hall, who was convicted in Channel 4 from 1993 to 1999. Concerns about the extent of such cases led to the formation 2003 of the horrific murder of Joan Albert, aged 79. It was taken up by Rough Justice after an in 1997 of the Criminal Cases Review Commission. It has since referred 629 cases back to active campaign on Hall’s behalf but then, in 2013, he told prison officials that he was guilty. In the Court of Appeal, 414 of which had been successful; a further 689 cases are under review. doing so, he gravely undermined the claims of many of the genuinely innocent. He hanged him - But both Rough Justice and Trial and Error were discontinued, victims of media austerity. self in prison the following year. As the former armed robber Noel “Razor” Smith notes in his wry Investigations into such cases take time and money. With broadcasters and news papers poem “The Old Lags”, prison is full of people who claim they were wrongly convicted: forced to tighten their belt, there is little appetite for researching complex claims that may lead But there is little editorial outrage about a murder trial being held in secret and scant concern nowhere.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence
    An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics ‘Seldom do introductions to any fi eld offer such a wealth of information or provide such a useful array of exercise activities for students in the way that this book does. Coulthard and Johnson not only provide their readers with extensive examples of the actual evidence used in the many law cases described here but they also show how the linguist’s “toolkit” was used to address the litigated issues. In doing this, they give valuable insights about how forensic linguists think, do their analyses and, in some cases, even testify at trial.’ Roger W. Shuy, Distinguished Research Professor of Linguistics, Emeritus, Georgetown University ‘This is a wonderful textbook for students, providing stimulating examples, lucid accounts of relevant linguistic theory and excellent further reading and activities. The foreign language of law is also expertly documented, explained and explored. Language as evidence is cast centre stage; coupled with expert linguistic analysis, the written and spoken clues uncovered by researchers are foregrounded in unfolding legal dramas. Coulthard and Johnson have produced a clear and compelling work that contains its own forensic linguistic puzzle.’ Annabelle Mooney, Roehampton University, UK From the accusation of plagiarism surrounding The Da Vinci Code, to the infamous hoaxer in the Yorkshire Ripper case, the use of linguistic evidence in court and the number of linguists called to act as expert witnesses in court trials has increased rapidly in the past fi fteen years. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics provides a timely and accessible introduction to this rapidly expanding subject. Using knowledge and experience gained in legal settings – Coulthard in his work as an expert witness and Johnson in her work as a West Midlands police offi cer – the two authors combine an array of perspectives into a distinctly unifi ed textbook, focusing throughout on evidence from real and often high profi le cases including serial killer Harold Shipman, the Bridgewater Four and the Birmingham Six.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Criminal Justice
    Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:37 24 May 2016 Understanding Criminal Justice Few subjects provoke as much public fascination and political concern as crime, criminality, criminology, and criminal justice policy and practice. Understanding Criminal Justice seeks to provide students with a critical introduction to the range of theoretical, policy and operational issues faced by the criminal justice system in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland at the beginning of the twenty-first century. It anticipates little or no prior knowledge of criminal justice, and seeks to provide an introduction to the area. This critical textbook provides both a thorough overview of the procedures central to the workings of the criminal justice system and a distillation of the topical debates that surround it. It outlines the political and historical context, detailing key procedures and challenging students to engage with current debates. Containing chapters on policing, prosecution, community justice and alternative modes of justice, this text provides a comprehensive coverage of the key topics included within under- graduate criminology programmes at an introductory level. Written in a lively and accessible style, this book will also be of interest to general readers and practitioners in the criminal justice system. Azrini Wahidin is a Reader in Criminology and Criminal Justice in the School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen’s University Belfast, where she teaches criminology and criminal justice. She has written extensively in the field of older offenders in the criminal justice system and women in prison. Her books include: Older Women in the Criminal Justice System: Running Out of Time (Jessica Kingsley, 2004), Foucault and Ageing (Nova Press, 2005), Understanding Prison Staff (Willan, 2007) and Ageing, Crime and Society (Willan, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Newsletter 2016
    ICPO NEWS Issue No. 72 Summer 2016 ICPO 30th 25 years since Resettlement Anniversary the release In Ireland Conference of the While on Birmingham Six Licence The ICPO It is estimated that at any one time there are in excess of 1,200 Irish Contents people in prison overseas. The ICPO has contact with Irish people in prisons in more than twenty countries, the majority of whom are in the UK with many more detained throughout the US, Australia, Europe, Resettlement in Ireland while on licence 3 South and Central America and the Far East. London News 4 The Irish Council for Prisoners Overseas (ICPO) was established by the Irish Catholic Bishops' Conference in 1985 in response to serious ICPO 30th Anniversary 6 concerns regarding the number of Irish men and women in UK prisons. These deeply held concerns related to their trials and Family Issues 11 subsequent imprisonment. Campaigning for innocent prisoners in the UK 12 In recent years the ICPO has been able to offer a more comprehensive Let go of your stresses 14 service to prisoners and to expand our existing services to prisoners’ families. Currently the ICPO works for all Irish prisoners wherever Writing and Receiving Letters in ICPO 15 they are. It makes no distinction in terms of religious faith, the nature of the prison conviction, or of a prisoner’s status. Your Letters 18 Smidín 19 The objectives of the ICPO are to: Sports Update 20 Identify and respond to the needs of Irish prisoners abroad, and their families; Puzzles 22 Research and provide relevant information to prisoners on issues Recent Events 24 such as deportation, repatriation and transfer; Focus public attention on issues affecting Irish prisoners (ill- treatment, racist abuse, etc); Engage in practical work in aid of justice and human rights for Irish migrants, refugees and prisoners at an international level; Visit Irish prisoners abroad where possible both in the UK and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Page Template
    Miscarriages of JusticeUK (MOJUK) 22 Berners St, Birmingham B19 2DR was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment and having served the equivalent term was released. Tele: 0121- 507 0844 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mojuk.org.uk He did not attempt to appeal against his conviction. 3. In August 2009 Charlton made an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission MOJUK: Newsletter ‘Inside Out’ No 575 (24/03/2016) - Cost £1 ("CCRC"). It decided to investigate and concluded there were grounds to refer his conviction to this court. They then invited and received an application from Ali. They concluded that exceptional cir - IPCC Refers Leon Briggs Investigation to Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) cumstances existed justifying referral of his plea of guilty, despite the absence of any previous The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has concluded its investigation attempt by Ali to appeal his manslaughter conviction. Accordingly, both appeal again against con - into the circumstances surrounding the death of Leon Briggs, and has referred the case to the viction upon references by the CCRC under s.9 Criminal Appeal Act 1995 on the basis that there is Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a decision on whether criminal charges should be a real possibility that the Court of Appeal will consider that the appellants' convictions are unsafe. brought against any individual. On 4 November 2013, Mr Briggs was detained by Bedfordshire 208. It is true that a plea of guilty does not deprive us of jurisdiction to examine the safe - Police in a street in Luton under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act and restrained, before ty of Ali's conviction of manslaughter.
    [Show full text]
  • Pxx SJ Miscarriages of Justice.Indd 61 3/6/2012 11:34:35 AM the IBA’S Human Rights Institute
    Wrongly accused: who is responsible for investigating miscarriages of justice? Edited by Jon Robins SOLICITORSJOURNAL Justice Gap series pxx_SJ_Miscarriages of Justice.indd 61 3/6/2012 11:34:35 AM The IBA’s Human Rights Institute The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), established in 1995, has become a leading global force in human rights, working to promote and protect the independence of the judiciary and the ability of lawyers to practice freely and without interference under a just rule of law. The IBAHRI runs training programmes and workshops, capacity building projects with bar associations, fact-fi nding missions, trial observations; issues regular reports and press releases disseminated widely to UN bodies, international governmental and non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders; and undertakes many other projects working towards its objectives. All our activities are funded by grants and individual donations. Become a member for just £35 a year – less than £3 a month – to help support our projects. Your contribution will have a tangible effect on the protection and promotion of human rights around the world. Visit www.ibanet.org/IBAHRI.aspx for more information, and click join to become a member. Alternatively, email us at [email protected]. Our work around the world Work carried out prior to 2010 Work carried out in 2010 IFC_SJ_Miscarriages of Justice.indd 1 3/6/2012 11:29:33 AM contents Wrongly accused: who is responsible for investigating miscarriages of justice? Contents Foreword by Mr
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Cases Review Commission's Effectiveness in Handling Cases from Northern Ireland
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 22, Issue 4 1998 Article 26 The Criminal Cases Review Commission’s Effectiveness in Handling Cases from Northern Ireland Siobhan M. Keegan∗ ∗ Copyright c 1998 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The Criminal Cases Review Commission’s Effectiveness in Handling Cases from Northern Ireland Siobhan M. Keegan Abstract This Comment considers the Northern Ireland Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), its establishment, and its likely effects on miscarriages of justice. Part I of this Comment considers British and Northern Irish law. Part I also highlights British law leading up to the creation of the CCRC and Northern Irish law in light of its unique elements. Part II explains the establishment of the CCRC, its powers, and structure. Additionally, Part II discusses various commentary on the creation of the CCRC. Part III analyzes the future effectiveness of the CCRC in correcting miscarriages of justice, paying particular attention to the case of Northern Ireland. This Comment concludes that although the Commission is an improvement on the Home Office, miscarriages of justice cases still face a system riddled with many challenges. COMMENTS THE CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION'S EFFECTIVENESS IN HANDLING CASES FROM NORTHERN IRELAND Siobhan M. Keegan* INTRODUCTION In 1920, the Republic of Ireland gained independence from the United Kingdom.' Northern Ireland remained a part of Great Britain and governed
    [Show full text]
  • INUK Innocence Project First Steps
    Setting up an Innocence Project – First Steps The following outlines the ‘first steps’ in setting up a member innocence project and the things that students can do to put the foundations of their innocence projects in place in readiness for undertaking live client casework. Part One: Getting the foundations in place Basic Knowledge Ensure that the basic information about INUK is understood by student caseworkers. For instance, they need to know the details of the INUK caseworking protocols, the INUK Student Handbook and, crucially, the Client Care Letter (all available in the INUK Innocence Projects’ Starter Pack) so that they know the basics about what the INUK is, what an innocence project is and the operational practices for member innocence projects. All student caseworkers need to be familiar with the workings of the CCRC (or the SCCRC for member innocence projects in Scotland). A good starting point is the CCRC/SCCRC website, which links to the key statutes that govern its operations. Students may also want to read the critical analyses on the limitations of the CCRC contained in: Naughton, M. (2009) (Editor) The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Hope for the Innocent?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. This book is the product of the Inaugural Innocence Network UK (INUK) Symposium that was held on the 10th Anniversary of the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), 31 March 2007, University of Bristol. It brings together critical perspectives on the operations of the CCRC from victim-support workers, practitioners and academics from the UK, the United States and Canada in terms of its limitations to deal with claims of innocence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bridgewater Four Case
    —-\ '__. -p.._ JOIN THE CAMPAIGN WHAT YOU CAN DU FREE 1 Write to the Home Secretary, urging him to re—open the Bridgewater Four case. 2 Write to your MP asking him to lobby the Home Secretary to re-open e case. 3 Write and raise the matter with the Euro-MP For your area. im risonment Q Acquaint your Trade Union, Church, Political Party, or p any other organisation with which you are associated of the circumstances of the case and enlist their support. ‘Pm 5 Publicise the case as extensively as possible by talking to i ‘; the media, discussing with Friends and enlisting their support. l I I 6 . Sign and circulate the petition as widely as possible, nu asking For the case to be re-opened by the Home Secretary. 7 write to the men who are suffering this grave injustice, telling them of your support. 8 Any donations, no matter how large or small, will be thankfully Michael Hickey Jim Robinson received and applied in Full in the Fight For justice For the Bridgewater Four. All will be duly acknowledged. I OCE Q%@Q,\iU u 0% \\.V ., / ~ &\@ ~-\..;-@%@\ _ _ . _ 5; Q’ Vincent Hickey Pat MQ||Qy (Died in PHSOIT) (HR BRIDGEWATER FOUR CAMPAIGN P.O. Box 2273, Hythall, Birmingham,Bh7 6LU |c'r||v|s 2 3 MURDER AT YEW TREE FARM JAMES ROBINSON, despite physical threats of violence and psych- On 19th September 1978, Carl Bridgewater, a newspaper boy, was ological torture, constantly denied any involvement. He pleaded delivering papers to Yew Tree Farm in Staffordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder Law Misinterpreted for 30 Years Joint Enterprise Murder: Foresight Doesn’T Prove Guilt John Mcavoy Ironman Competitor
    “The tide is beginning to turn” James Timpson - new Chair of the Prison Reform Trust Through the Gate // page 28 “Cast-iron window frames “There was something oozed rusty water down surreal about watching men the National Newspaper for Prisoners & Detainees paint-fl aked walls and a watching a fi lm about their ‘Hit The fi lm of slime lined the work from inside prison when a voice for prisoners since 1990 treacherous concrete fl oor” I’d already seen it outside” Road Smack’ March 2016 / Issue No. 201 / www.insidetime.org / A ‘not for profi t’ publication / ISSN 1743-7342 Name withheld Rachel Billington Alison Henderson An average of 60,000 copies distributed monthly Independently verifi ed by the Audit Bureau of Circulations Mailbag // page 4 Diary // page 16 Comment // page 24 Murder law misinterpreted for 30 years Joint enterprise murder: foresight doesn’t prove guilt John McAvoy Ironman competitor Geir Madland jury’s role in establishing a Ameen Jogee was convicted From Prison Van to Ironman: “It’s sad how co-accused’s intention to ac- of the murder of former police tively encourage the murder. officer Paul Fyfe even though many talented people there are in our prisons, A landmark ruling, handed “The correct position is that… Jogee was outside the allowing their talent to go to waste. I’ve trained down by the Supreme Court foresight of what the principal Leicester house in which of England and Wales last might do is evidence from Mohammed Hirsi killed Fyfe with Olympic Gold Medallists since I’ve been out, month, is being seen by cam- which the jury may infer that with a kitchen knife.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    Copyright material – 9780230216914 © Michael Naughton 2013 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2013 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries ISBN: 978–0–230–21690–7 hardback ISBN: 978–0–230–21691–4 paperback This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing- processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • 1459193525585.Pdf
    THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNSOLVED CRIMES Ency UC-FM_final.indd i 7/27/09 12:07:39 PM THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNSOLVED CRIMES Second Edition Michael Newton Ency UC-FM_final.indd iii 7/27/09 12:07:40 PM The Encyclopedia of Unsolved Crimes, Second Edition Copyright © 2009 by Michael Newton All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact: Facts On File, Inc. An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Newton, Michael, 1951– The encyclopedia of unsolved crimes / Michael Newton. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8160-7818-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8160-7818-1 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Crime—Encyclopedias. 2. Homicide—Encyclopedias. I. Title. HV6251.N48 2010 364.103—dc22 2008045073 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses, associations, institutions, or sales promotions. Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755. You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com Text design by Erika K. Arroyo Cover design by Keith Trego/Takeshi Takahashi Printed in the United States of America VB MSRF 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper and contains 30 percent postconsumer recycled content.
    [Show full text]
  • Why a Presumption of Guilt May Reduce the Possibility of Wrongful
    2011 The Presumption of Innocence and Wrongful Convictions 40 How the Presumption of Innocence Renders the Innocent Vulnerable to Wrongful Convictions Dr. Michael Naughton* This article argues, contrary to a straightforward reading, that the presumption of innocence and accompanying principles - the burden of proof on the prosecution to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt - acts in reality against the interests of those who might be innocent at every stage of the criminal justice process. This is because the „presumption‟, in effect, renders suspects of crime passive and generally inactive whilst the „burden‟ places pressure on the police and prosecution to chip away at the presumed innocent status and construct cases that might obtain a conviction, rendering innocent victims vulnerable to wrongful convictions. This signals that the presumption of innocence needs to be understood in terms of the distinction between theory and reality. As it currently works in practise the presumption does not protect against wrongful convictions as is widely supposed. In fact, it can actually facilitate them. Alternatively, reflecting on the investigative approach of the University of Bristol Innocence Project, it is argued that the innocent will be better protected against wrongful conviction only when all resources and efforts are orientated towards subjecting the evidence claimed to indicate guilt to critical interrogation to see if it can be substantiated. I - Introduction The Presumption of Innocence (P.o.I.) is a long standing principle at the heart of the criminal justice system in England and Wales that can be traced to the 18th Century.1 The right for those accused of crimes to be presumed innocent is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,2 the European Convention on Human Rights3 and is enacted domestically in the U.K.
    [Show full text]