DOCSLIB.ORG

Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine (

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( 5/5/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 4 May 2018 | OSCE Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 4 Ma 2018 KYIV 5 May 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and more in Luhansk region, compared with the previous reporting period. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasefire violations inside the Petrivske disengagement area. The SMM’s access remained restricted in all three disengagement areas and elsewhere, including near Shevchenko, Debaltseve and Kreminets. The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The SMM continued to facilitate access to the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) for Voda Donbassa water company employees; it heard ceasefire violations in the area despite security guarantees. It also continued to facilitate and monitor repairs to high-voltage power lines near Yuzhna-Lomuvatka. The SMM visited two border areas not under government control. It also continued to monitor the situation in Balakliia and monitored a gathering in Uzhhorod. In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations[1], including about 110 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 1,240 explosions). On the evening and night of 3-4 May, the SMM camera at the DFS (15km north of Donetsk) recorded, in sequence, 16 projectiles in ight from north to south, an undetermined explosion, nine projectiles in ight from north to south, followed by totals of six undetermined explosions and 95 projectiles (89 from north to south, six from south to north), all 1-3km west. On the evening of 3 May, while in Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk), the SMM heard and saw 18 airbursts of an anti-aircraft gun (ZU-23, 23mm) and heard 15 undetermined explosions and seven shots of small-arms re, all 5-12km south-west and north-west. On the evening and night of 3-4 May, while in Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north-east of Donetsk), the SMM heard four undetermined explosions, ten explosions assessed as impacts of 120mm mortar rounds, two explosions assessed as impacts of rounds of an undetermined weapon, 140 bursts of heavy-machine-gun re and about 15 minutes of uncountable and overlapping heavy-machine-gun and small-arms re, all 6- 7km east, south-east and south-south-east. At the same location on the morning of 4 May, the SMM heard four undetermined explosions 2-3km east. On the morning of 4 May, positioned 1km north-west of Pyshchevyk (government- controlled, 26km north-east of Mariupol), the SMM heard 18 undetermined explosions and 25 bursts of heavy-machine-gun and small-arms re, all at undetermined distances south-east. https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/379951 1/6 5/5/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 4 May 2018 | OSCE During the day on 4 May, positioned in Avdiivka (government-controlled, 17km north of Donetsk) for about six hours, the SMM heard 27 undetermined explosions and about ve minutes of continuous, uncountable and overlapping small-arms re, and heard and saw two airbursts of an undetermined weapon, all 2-5km east-south-east, south-east and south. In Luhansk region, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations, including 51 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (two explosions). The SMM continued to monitor the disengagement process and to pursue full access to the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska (government-controlled, 16km north-east of Luhansk), Zolote (government-controlled, 60km west of Luhansk) and Petrivske (non-government-controlled, 41km south of Donetsk), as foreseen in the Framework Decision of the Trilateral Contact Group relating to disengagement of forces and hardware of 21 September 2016. The SMM’s access remained restricted, but the Mission was able to partially monitor them.* On the evening of 27 April, the SMM camera in Petrivske recorded six undetermined explosions and two bursts of small-arms re, all 0.1-5km south, west-north-west and north-west (assessed as outside the disengagement area). On the morning of 4 May, positioned in Bohdanivka (government-controlled, 41km south-west of Donetsk), the SMM heard eight undetermined explosions at undetermined distances south and east-south- east (assessed as outside the Petrivske disengagement area). During the night of 3-4 May, while on the eastern edge of the Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement area, the SMM heard three undetermined explosions 3-5km south-west and west (assessed as outside the disengagement area). On the morning of 4 May, positioned near the Zolote disengagement area, the SMM heard 39 undetermined explosions 5-10km east and south (assessed as outside the disengagement area). The SMM continued to monitor the withdrawal of weapons in implementation of the Package of Measures and its Addendum, as well as the Memorandum. In violation of withdrawal lines in government-controlled areas, the SMM saw a mortar (type undetermined) on the eastern edge of Mariupol, six multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) (BM-21 Grad, 122mm) in Topolyne (19km north-west of Mariupol) and 12 self- propelled howitzers (2S1 Gvozdika 122mm) near Kremenivka (27km north-west of Mariupol). In a non-government-controlled area, the SMM saw ve tanks (T-72) – three stationary and two moving – in a row of trees near Bezimenne (30km east of Mariupol). Beyond withdrawal lines but outside designated storage sites in government-controlled areas, the SMM saw two surface-to-air missile systems (9K37) near Topolyne, three surface-to-air missile systems (9K33 Osa) near Kasianivka (22km north of Mariupol). The SMM observed weapons that could not be veried as withdrawn, as their storage did not comply with the criteria set out in the 16 October 2015 notication from the SMM to the signatories of the Package of Measures on eective monitoring and verication of the withdrawal of heavy weapons. In non-government-controlled areas, the SMM saw that six https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/379951 2/6 5/5/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 4 May 2018 | OSCE towed howitzers (2A65, Msta-B, 152mm), four MLRS (BM-21), three self-propelled howitzers (2S1) and nine towed howitzers (D-30 Lyagushka, 122mm) were again missing. The SMM observed armoured combat vehicles[2] in the security zone. In government- controlled-areas, the SMM saw an infantry ghting vehicle (IFV) (BMP variant) south of Novotroitske (36km south-west of Donetsk), an armoured personal carrier (BTR-4) near Kamianka (20km north of Donetsk) and ve IFVs (BMP-1) near Popasna (69km west of Luhansk). The SMM continued to facilitate and monitor repairs to high-voltage power lines near Yuzhna-Lomuvatka (non-government-controlled, 60km west of Luhansk). The SMM continued to facilitate the access of Voda Donbassa water company employees to the DFS in order to keep the station operational and monitored demining activities around the DFS. Positioned 2km west of Yasynuvata (non-government- controlled, 16km north-east of Donetsk), in Avdiivka, in Kruta Balka (non-government- controlled, 16km north of Donetsk) and 1.3km south-south-east of Kamianka, the SMM heard ceasere violations in the area (see ceasere violations table below) despite security guarantees having been provided. The SMM visited two border areas not under government control. While at a border crossing point near Novoazovsk (102km south-east of Donetsk) for about 25 minutes, the SMM saw four vehicles (one with Russian Federation license plates and three with “DPR” plates) enter Ukraine. While at a pedestrian border crossing point near Novoborovytsi (79 km south of Luhansk) for about 30 minutes, the SMM observed no pedestrians crossing the border. The SMM continued to monitor the situation in Balakliia (74km south-east of Kharkiv) after explosions at the ammunition storage depot that occurred on 3 May (see SMM Daily Report 4 May 2018). The SMM did not observe any damage to civilian infrastructure in the area where the storage depot is located and saw that the situation in Balakliia was calm. On 3 May the SMM observed a gathering in Uzhhorod. In front of the Zakarpattia Regional State Administration building at 10 Zahorska Street the SMM saw about 250 people (mixed ages and genders) carrying Ukrainian ags and banners reading “Together”. A member of the local population told the SMM that the protest was against the merger of several local villages with Uzhhorod city. The SMM saw ten law enforcement ocers present. It observed a calm situation. The SMM continued monitoring in Kherson, Odessa, Lviv, Dnipro, Chernivtsi and Kyiv. *Restrictions of SMM’s freedom of movement or other impediments to fulfilment of its mandate The SMM’s monitoring and freedom of movement are restricted by security hazards and threats, including risks posed by mines, unexploded ordnance (UXO), and other impediments – which vary from day to day. The SMM’s mandate provides for safe and secure access throughout Ukraine. All signatories of the Package of Measures have agreed on the need for this safe and secure access, that restriction of the SMM’s freedom of movement constitutes a violation, and on the need for rapid response to these violations. They have also agreed that the https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/379951 3/6 5/5/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 4 May 2018 | OSCE Joint Centre for Control and Co‑ordination (JCCC) should contribute to such response and co- ordinate mine clearance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UKRAINE the Constitution and Other Laws and Policies Protect Religious
    UKRAINE The constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom and, in practice, the government generally enforced these protections. The government generally respected religious freedom in law and in practice. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. Local officials at times took sides in disputes between religious organizations, and property restitution problems remained; however, the government continued to facilitate the return of some communal properties. There were reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. These included cases of anti-Semitism and anti- Muslim discrimination as well as discrimination against different Christian denominations in different parts of the country and vandalism of religious property. Various religious organizations continued their work to draw the government's attention to their issues, resolve differences between various denominations, and discuss relevant legislation. The U.S. government discusses religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. U.S. embassy representatives raised these concerns with government officials and promoted ethnic and religious tolerance through public outreach events. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 233,000 square miles and a population of 45.4 million. The government estimates that there are 33,000 religious organizations representing 55 denominations in the country. According to official government sources, Orthodox Christian organizations make up 52 percent of the country's religious groups. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church Moscow Patriarchate (abbreviated as UOC-MP) is the largest group, with significant presence in all regions of the country except for the Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv, and Ternopil oblasts (regions).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Diversity in Ukraine
    g, bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.238329; this version posted November 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. DATA NOTE Genome Diversity in Ukraine Taras K. Oleksyk 1,2,3,﹡, Walter W. Wolfsberger 1,2,3#, Alexandra Weber 4#, Khrystyna Shchubelka 2,3,5#, Olga T. Oleksyk 6, Olga Levchuk 7, Alla Patrus 7, Nelya Lazar 7, Stephanie O. Castro-Marquez 2,3, Patricia Boldyzhar 5, Alina Urbanovych 8, Viktoriya Stakhovska 9, Kateryna Malyar 10, Svitlana Chervyakova 11, Olena Podoroha 12 , Natalia Kovalchuk 13, Yaroslava Hasynets 1, Juan L. Rodriguez-Flores 14, Sarah Medley 2, Fabia Battistuzzi 2, Ryan Liu 15, Yong Hou 15, Siru Chen 15, Huanming Yang 15, Meredith Yeager 16, Michael Dean 16, Ryan E. Mills 17,﹡, and Volodymyr Smolanka 5 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod 88000, Ukraine; 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA; 3 Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, 00682, Puerto Rico; 4 Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; 5 Department of Medicine, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod 88000, Ukraine; 6 A. Novak Transcarpathian Regional Clinical Hospital, Uzhhorod 88000, Ukraine; 7 Astra Dia Inc., Uzhhorod 88000, Ukraine 8 Lviv National Medical
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • April 16, 2020 Dear TOUCH Sponsors and Donors, Our Last Update
    April 16, 2020 Dear TOUCH Sponsors and Donors, Our last update was on March 5, 2020. So much has changed in our world since that time. On that March date, only a few weeks ago, the COVID19 statistics globally were: • Number of cases: 97,500 • Number of deaths: 3,345 individuals As of today, April 16, the number of worldwide cases and deaths have skyrocketed to: • Number of cases: 2,150,000 • Number of deaths: 142,000 individuals Ukraine is included in those statistics. Uzhhorod is the government center of the Transcarpathia (Zakarpattia) Oblast. An oblast is like a “state” in the US and there are 24 oblasts in Ukraine. This is the current information for both Zakarpattia Oblast and for Ukraine: In the Zakarpattia Oblast Confirmed Cases Recovered Deaths 116 12 2 In Ukraine Confirmed Cases Recovered Deaths 4,161 186 116 Many of you asked how the children and people of Uzhhorod were doing. We have asked questions to our friends, medical contacts, and program directors to get answers. Here is a summary information we have received from them over the last few days: • Uzhhorod is in “shutdown” similar to what we are doing in the US • Borders between Ukraine and other countries are closed and there is no public transportation in towns, between cities or regions. • Restaurants, non-essential businesses, public schools, Uzhhorod National University, and public transportation have all been closed since mid-March. • Grocery stores, gas stations and pharmacies are open. • After April 6, citizens over 60 were asked to remain at home and groups of more than 2 individuals are not allowed without a good reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Khmelnytskyi Investment Profile
    Khmelnytskyi Investment Profile 2019 Table of Contents About Khmelnytskyi Economics and Key Sectors Business Environment Why Khmelnytskyi? Infrastructure Trade and Services Doing Business Summary Economic Data Garment Industry Industrial Park Key Facts Railway Transport Food Processing Local Taxes and Fees Geopolitical Profile Road Transport Construction Trading and Office of the City Centers Municipal Public Industries and Logistics Transport Event and Exhibition BPO / SSC / IT sector Facilities Investments Success Stories Standard of Living Labour Market Other Relevant in Khmelnytskyi and Education Information Quality of Life Labour Market Interesting Facts Municipal Services Education about Khmelnytskyi Annual Key Events Transportation Universities in Khmelnytskyi Cost of Living Achievements Municipal Institutions 2 3 About Khmelnytskyi Photo: Oleksandr Savenko Why Khmelnytskyi? Strategic Qualified The most The largest Vivid geographical labour force affordable trading center cultural location housing in Western life market Ukraine 6 7 Summary Key Facts Transit Routs Area Khmelnytskyi is a marketplace for innovation and opportunity. The city is one of the best Time zone UTC +2 Gdansk places for doing business in Ukraine, which has Climate Temperate continental dynamic development, progressive views and Accessibility By train — from Poland, Slovakia, the safest city foresight of its residents. According to Focus Kyiv Romania, Bulgaria and Russia. in Ukraine Rava-Ruska magazine Khmelnytskyi was recognized as one Lviv By bus — from more than 100 Pshemysl of the most comfortable cities in Ukraine – it got European cities. second place (after Kyiv) and was ranked first in the Transparency and financial health of cities Population (2019) 273,700 Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Chop and regions in Ukraine survey conducted by the The average monthly gross ₴ 8,513 / € 288 Chernivtsi International Center for Policy Studies in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM's ASSISTANCE
    IOM’s ASSISTANCE TO CONFLICT-AFFECTED PEOPLE IN UKRAINE MONTHLY REPORT Migration for the Benefit of All MARCH 2017 HIGHLIGHTS IOM ASSISTANCE TO IDPs AND 5 APRIL 2017 CONFLICT-AFFECTED POPULATION IN UKRAINE • The total number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) from 1,590,056 Lutsk Chernihiv Total number of IDPs in Sumy Crimea and eastern Ukraine is Ukraine according to the Rivne Ministry of Social Policy Zhytomyr 1,590,056 as of 3 April 2017, Kyiv Lviv Kharkiv 137,665 Ternopil Poltava according to the Ministry IDPs and people in need assisted by IOM Khmelnytskyi Luhansk of Social Policy of Ukraine. Cherkasy Ivano-Frankivsk Vinnytsia • IOM assisted over 137,000 Dnipro Uzhhorod Chernivtsi Kropyvnytskyi 59,804 34,990 42,871 Donetsk vulnerable IDPs and conflict- 44% 25% 31% women men children affected people in 24 regions Mykolaiv Zaporizhia Odesa of Ukraine. Kherson • Lack of funds made 40% of 128,273 8,120 1,272 People provided with People provided People assisted vulnerable IDPs IOM assisted humanitarian aid with livelihood within community support development projects with cash in Ukraine refuse medical treatment, according IOM ASSISTANCE TO IDPs AND CONFLICT-AFFECTED Humanitarian Livelihood Community to the post-distribution aid support development POPULATION IN UKRAINE IS European U.S. Department support Union of State Bureau CURRENTLY SUPPORTED BY: of Population, Refugees, and Migration monitoring of IOM’s project © IOM Ukraine in 13 regions of Ukraine. MIGRATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL www.iom.org.ua, [email protected], https://www.facebook.com/IOM.Ukraine Enlarged version of the map on page 7 IOM’s RESPONSE TO DATE IOM EXPANDS ITS LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT TO CONFLICT-AFFECTED PEOPLE Since the beginning of the year, IOM partner another 2,300 IDPs and members of IDP- NGO staff plays host communities have been supported with a baby with micro-business, self-employment and while baby’s professional orientation training across the mother, an IDP, country.
    [Show full text]
  • Sister Cities News
    Sister Cities News Vol. 24 Issue 1 Newsletter of the Uzhhorod-Corvallis Sister Cities Association Winter 2013 BOARD OF Presidents Message DIRECTORS 2011 Hello Members, Ken Trueba - President This past year was busy and productive and as an [email protected] organization we have lots to be proud of. Last summer we received the Sister Cities International Jack Peterson Award for Cities between 50,000 and 100,000! Els Lofgren Peggy Giles A TOUCH delegation of 19 people went to Uzhhorod and continued their good work there. Over the years and under Lynne Hindman the leadership of Alice Rampton and Sabra Killen, TOUCH has greatly Gary Meddaugh increased the quality of life for not just the orphans at Chaslivtsi, but for many other children in need in the community of Uzhhorod. Martin Vartanov Sue Trautwein This last fall OSU veterinary students put together a walk to increase the Marc Vomocil awareness of animals, in particular dogs, in Uzhhorod. They are planning both a human project focusing on tuberculosis and an animal welfare Robert Kokenyesi project this fall in Uzhhorod. Carla Francis Victoria Rosoha We hosted a Mayoral visit last spring and met with the Open World delegation from Ukraine, hosted by Umpqua College faculty and longtime Shelly Hunt CUSCA member Pete Bober. There is a new addition to the newsletter, Nandan Rao News From Uzhhorod, given to us by Maya Tarasova, to provide you with Peggy Peirson a bit more personal information about what your efforts mean to some of the children in Uzhhorod. Beverly Smith Finally, I would like to thank all of you who have renewed your membership.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016): State Follow-Up Replies Under Review
    Ukraine: NGO Report on the Follow-up to the Concluding Observations in cooperation with the Centre for Civil and Political Rights This report is submitted by the Human Rights House Foundation (HRHF) in cooperation with the Centre for Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The report is endorsed by the following organisations: Members of the Human Rights House Chernihiv: • Humanistic Technologies Center “AHALAR”, Chernihiv; • “MART”, Chernihiv; • Transcarpathian Public Center, Uzhhorod; • Chernihiv public committee for human rights protection, Chernihiv. Members of the Human Rights House Kiev: • Centre for Civil Liberties; • Human Rights Information Center. For further information please contact: Anna Innocenti International Advocacy Officer Human Rights House Foundation (HRHF) Tel: +4122 33 22 556 Email: [email protected] 2 Timeframe and Relevant Documents • December 2014: Adoption of the Concluding Observations: http://goo.gl/pWLQbL • December 2015: Follow-up State party's report: http://goo.gl/MZKUhl • Current Status (May 2016): State Follow-up Replies under review. General Observations In 2015, Ukraine developed a National Strategy for Human Rights, approved by Presidential Decree No.501/2015,1 with human rights organisations involved in the development. This is the first time such a document has been approved at the state level. This strategy stipulates the following goals and outcomes with regard to protection from torture. Strategic goals: • Create an efficient system to prevent torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. • Shape conditions to prevent improper treatment. • Promote zero tolerance to all manifestations of improper treatment in society. Expected outcomes: • An efficient system to investigate crimes related to torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, including enforced disappearances.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Modern Russian-Ukraine War: Donetsk Dimension
    Zeszyty Naukowe AON nr 3(100) 2015 ISSN 2299-6753 SOURCES OF MODERN RUSSIAN-UKRAINE WAR: DONETSK DIMENSION Prof. Ihor TODOROV, Ph.D. Uzhhorod, Ukraine Abstract The article describes the origis �������������������ad the begiig o the ��raiia-raiia-��ssia co����������lict i ����������the east o ��raieraie in 2014. The conditions for the emergence of this conflict are defined. It proves the leading role of Russia as a principal organiser and executor of the war against Ukraine. It addresses the lack of effort by the West to confront Russian aggression. Key words: geopolitical grounds, east Ukraine, Donetsk region, Russian aggression, Ukraine-Russia war, “Donetsk People’s Republic” Further escalation of the conflict, or in fact, the In the Donbas�����������������������������, there have always been pro- war, in the eastern Ukraine confronts researchers Russian sympathies, especially on an emotional with the need to find out the origins of this level. Until recently, these sympathies had not situation, including its geopolitical background. moved into the sphere of political separatism. This is the purpose of our scientific research. They were expressed mainly through the vote Achieving this purpose involves implementation for the Party of Regions, which, conventionally, of such tasks as the definition of the conditions was considered pro-Russian. Besides, sympathy for conflict resolution, and proving the leading for the “northern neighbour” and the Soviet past role of Russia as the organiser and key executor was expressed in the Donetsk region in the form of the war against Ukraine. The implementation of of support for the openly pro-Russian Communist these tasks relies on the documents issued by the Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Location-Based Social Distancing Recommender System with Context Evaluation: a Project Approach
    Mobile Location-Based Social Distancing Recommender System with Context Evaluation: a Project Approach Olga Artemenko a,b, Nataliia Kunanetsb,c, Volodymyr Pasichnykb, Vasyl Kutd and Oleksandr Lozytskyy b a PHEI "Bukovinian University", Darvina Street 2-a, Chernivtsi, 58000, Ukraine b Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandery Street 32-a, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine c Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Universutetska Street 1, Lviv, 79000, Ukraine d dUzhhorod National University, Universytetska Street 14, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine Abstract This paper describes main modern tendencies for projects in the design and development of urban route planning recommender systems. In this research the difficulties and unsolved problems were analyzed for development and use of location-based mobile recommender systems for social distancing. This paper focuses on project of development of mobile location-based recommender system with context evaluation. The main features of decision- making on passing and changing the route are analyzed. Technologies for determining the danger of crowding and managing human flows have been studied. The study considers the possibility of creating software to manage the flow of people within the city to ensure social distancing. A prototype of a mobile application has been created, which will be used to teach the multi-agent system the peculiarities of the space-time behavior of pedestrians during quarantine. Keywords 1 Mobile location-based recommender systems, urban route planning, social distancing, crowd prevention management 1. Introduction The key element for social distancing is the management of human crowd [1]. Everyone has a smart gadget of one type or another and information technology for managing big data, including personal data of smartphone users, opens up new opportunities to prevent crowds.
    [Show full text]
  • Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( MM
    2/6/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 5 February 2018 | OSCE Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 5 Feruar 2018 KYIV 6 February 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations in Donetsk region compared with the previous 24 hours and no ceasere violations in Luhansk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasere violations near the Petrivske disengagement area. The Mission’s access remained restricted in all three areas and elsewhere, including in Kreminets and Naberezhne.* The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines near Sievierodonetsk and Khrustalnyi. The SMM continued to facilitate and monitor repair and maintenance works on essential civilian infrastructure near Shchastia, Artema, Kalynove, Mykhailivka-Almazna, and Slovianoserbsk. The Mission visited ve border areas not under government control. The SMM observed gatherings in Kharkiv and Odessa, and followed up on reports of an incident at the building where the Zakarpattia Hungarian Union is located in Uzhhorod. In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations[1] including about 200 explosions compared with the previous 24 hours (290 explosions). During the day on 5 February, the SMM camera at the Donetsk Filtration Station (15km north of Donetsk) recorded ten projectiles in ight from west to east 0.5-1.5km south. During the day on 5 February, positioned at the railway station in Yasynuvata (non- government-controlled, 16km north-east of Donetsk) for over three hours, the SMM heard seven undetermined explosions and 18 bursts and shots of small-arms re, all 2-3km west and north-west.
    [Show full text]
  • 19% 3.2 M 1.5 M 370,417 6,868 151,632
    Ukraine – COVID-19 SITUATION OVERVIEW No. 8 29 October 2020 This report is a consolidation of United Nations informational products, drafted by the Office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator in Ukraine. HIGHLIGHTS CONFIRMED DEATHS RECOVERED Eastern Ukraine CASES COVID-19 confirmed 370,417 6,868 151,632 cases 9,177 3,482 Donetska Luhanska oblast (GCA) oblast (GCA) 6,433 1,511 Donetska Luhanska oblast (NGCA) oblast (NGCA) *This figure does not include the number of confirmed cases in the non-Government- controlled areas (NGCA). Data source: Ministry of Health, Ukraine and entities in control of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. Age group 0-19 20-29 30-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Female The boundaries and names shown, and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Male • As the number of new confirmed COVID -19 cases continues to grow, the Government of Ukraine has extended quarantine restrictions in the country until 31 December 2020 and made changes to the criteria for adaptive quarantine. The decision limits the opening hours of restaurants and other catering establishments, and also toughens the restriction on holding mass events. • The division of the country into the quarantine zones was reviewed and subsequent regulations were introduced. The "red" zone will now include the following regional (oblast) centers: Zhytomyr, Uzhhorod, Ivano-Frankivsk, Mykolayiv, Poltava, Sumy, Rivne, Kharkiv, Khmelnytsky, Chernihiv and Chernivtsi. According to data provided by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, currently, all regions in Ukraine are not ready to ease quarantine measures.
    [Show full text]