Comparative Genomics Ross C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Genomics Ross C Primer Comparative Genomics Ross C. Hardison complete genome sequence of features of two organisms will often an organism can be considered be encoded within the DNA that is A to be the ultimate genetic conserved between the species. More map, in the sense that the heritable precisely, the DNA sequences encoding characteristics are encoded within the proteins and RNAs responsible the DNA and that the order of all the for functions that were conserved nucleotides along each chromosome from the last common ancestor is known. However, knowledge of should be preserved in contemporary the DNA sequence does not tell us genome sequences. Likewise, the DNA directly how this genetic information sequences controlling the expression leads to the observable traits and of genes that are regulated similarly behaviors (phenotypes) that we in two related species should also be want to understand. Finding all the conserved. Conversely, sequences that functional parts of genome sequences encode (or control the expression and using this information to improve of) proteins and RNAs responsible the health of individuals and society for differences between species will are the focus of the next phase of the themselves be divergent. Human Genome Project (Collins et al. Different questions can be addressed 2003). Comparative analyses of genome by comparing genomes at different sequences will be a major part of this phylogenetic distances (Figure 1). effort. Broad insights about types of genes can The major principles of comparative be gleaned by genomic comparisons genomics are straightforward. Common at very long phylogenetic distances, Ross C. Hardison is at the Center for Comparative Ge- nomics and Bioinformatics at The Pennsylvania State Primers provide a concise introduction into an University in University Park, Pennsylvania, United important aspect of biology that is of broad and States of America. E-mail: [email protected] current interest. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000058 Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Page 156 sequence to increase the number of Glossary positions with matching nucleotides. Several powerful alignment algorithms Conserved: Derived from a common ancestor and retained in contemporary related have been developed to align two or species. Conserved features may or may not be under selection. more sequences. Evolutionary drift: The accumulation of sequence differences that have little or no However, the computational power impact on the fitness of an organism; such neutral mutations are not under selection. required to align billions of nucleotides Sequence polymorphisms arise randomly in a population, most of which have no effect on between two or more species vastly function. Stochastic processes allow a small fraction of these to increase in frequency until exceeds what is normally available in they are fixed in a population; these are detectable as neutral substitutions in interspecies individual laboratories. Thus, several comparisons. research groups make available Homologs: Features (including DNA and protein sequences) in species being compared precomputed alignments of genome that are similar because they are ancestrally related. sequences through servers or browsers Negative selection: The removal of deleterious mutations from a population; also referred (Table 1). An early example is EnteriX, to as purifying selection. for enteric bacteria (Florea et al. Nonredundant protein sets: The set of proteins from which similar proteins, derived from 2000; McClelland et al. 2000). Aligned duplicated genes, have been removed. human, mouse, and rat genomes can Orthologs: Homologous genes (or any DNA sequences) that separated because of be accessed at several sites, including a speciation event; they are derived from the same gene in the last common ancestor. VISTA (Mayor et al. 2000; Couronne et Orthologs are distinguished from paralogs, which are homologous genes that separated al. 2003), the conservation tracks at the because of gene duplication events. University of California at Santa Cruz Phylogenetic distances: Measures of the degree of separation between two organisms (UCSC) genome browser (Kent et al. or their genomes, expressed in various terms such as number of accumulated sequences 2002), Ensembl (Clamp et al. 2003), changes, number of years, or number of generations. The distances are often placed on and GALA (Giardine et al. 2003). phylogenetic trees, which show the deduced relationships among the organisms. Positive selection: The retention of mutations that benefit an organism; also referred to as What Can You Learn about Genome Darwinian selection. Evolution? Synteny: The property of being on the same chromosome. Conserved synteny means that The basic observation in comparative genes that are on the same chromosome in one species are also on the same chromosome in genomics is a description of the the comparison species; these are also referred to as homology blocks. matches between genomes. For example, in the roughly 75–80 e.g., greater than 1 billion years class of certain DNA segments, such as million years since humans diverged since their separation. For example, coding exons, noncoding RNAs, and from mouse, the large-scale gene comparing the genomes of yeast, some gene regulatory regions. Examples organization and gene order have worms, and flies reveals that these of analyses at this distance include been preserved (International Mouse eukaryotes encode many of the same comparisons among enteric bacteria Genome Sequencing Consortium proteins, and the nonredundant (McClelland et al. 2000), among several 2002). About 90% of the human protein sets of flies and worms are species of yeast (Cliften et al. 2001, genome is in large blocks of homology about the same size, being only twice 2003; Kellis et al. 2003), and between with mouse. These regions of conserved that of yeast (Rubin et al. 2000). The mouse and human (International synteny have many genes from one more complex developmental biology Mouse Genome Sequencing human chromosome that match genes of flies and worms is reflected in the Consortium 2002). The new comparison on a mouse chromosome, often in very greater number of signaling pathways of the genomes of Caenorhabditis briggsae similar orders. in these two species than in yeast. Over and Caenorhabditis elegans (Stein et al. Sequences with no obvious function, such very large distances, the order of 2003) falls in this category. In contrast, such as relics of transposons that were genes and the sequences regulating very similar genomes, such as those of last active in the common ancestor of their expression are generally not humans and chimpanzees (separated human and mouse, can still align in conserved. At moderate phylogenetic by about 5 million years of evolution), mammalian comparisons; thus, not distances (roughly 70–100 million years are particularly apt for finding the all the aligning DNA is functional. By of divergence), both functional and key sequence differences that may evaluating the quality of the alignments nonfunctional DNA is found within account for the differences in the genome-wide, the proportion that the conserved DNA. In these cases, organisms. These are sequence changes scores significantly higher than the functional sequences will show under positive selection. Comparative alignments in the ancestral (and a signature of purifying or negative genomics is thus a powerful and presumed nonfunctional) repeats can selection, which is that the functional burgeoning discipline that becomes be determined. This analysis leads to an sequences will have changed less than more and more informative as genomic estimate that about 5% of the human the nonfunctional or neutral DNA sequence data accumulate. genome is under purifying selection (Jukes and Kimura 1984). Not only Alignment of DNA sequences is the and thus is functional. This portion of does comparative genomics aim to core process in comparative genomics. the human genome under selection discriminate conserved from divergent An alignment is a mapping of the is about three times larger than the and functional from nonfunctional nucleotides in one sequence onto the portion coding for protein. Within the DNA, this approach is also contributing nucleotides in the other sequence, with noncoding sequences under selection, to identifying the general functional gaps introduced into one or the other one expects to find noncoding RNA PLoS Biology | http://biology.plosjournals.org Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Page 157 mouse genome (International Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium 2002). The other 60% is composed of at least two classes of sequences, resulting from lineage-specific insertions, deletions, and possibly other mechanisms. One class, occupying about 24% of the genome, is comprised of the repetitive elements that arose by transposition only on the human lineage (International Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium 2002). These particular insertions did not occur in mice, and thus they cannot align between human and mouse. Likewise, rodent- and mouse-specific retrotransposons independently expanded to occupy about 33% of the mouse genome. The lineage-specific and ancestral repeated elements occupy a substantial portion of the genome of all multicellular organisms, averaging about 50% in mammalian genomes and expanding even higher in the maize genome (San Miguel et al. 1996). The remaining 36% of the human genome currently cannot be accounted for unambiguously. Some of it could DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000058.g001 be explained by limitations in the
Recommended publications
  • The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet Is Available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C
    THE NATIONALA REPORTIN BRIEF C The New Science of Metagenomics Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet ADEMIES Although we can’t see them, microbes are essential for every part of human life— indeed all life on Earth. The emerging field of metagenomics provides a new way of viewing the microbial world that will not only transform modern microbiology, but also may revolu- tionize understanding of the entire living world. very part of the biosphere is impacted Eby the seemingly endless ability of microorganisms to transform the world around them. It is microorganisms, or microbes, that convert the key elements of life—carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur—into forms accessible to other living things. They also make necessary nutrients, minerals, and vitamins available to plants and animals. The billions of microbes living in the human gut help humans digest food, break down toxins, and fight off disease-causing pathogens. Microbes also clean up pollutants in the environment, such as oil and Bacteria in human saliva. Trillions of chemical spills. All of these activities are carried bacteria make up the normal microbial com- out not by individual microbes but by complex munity found in and on the human body. microbial communities—intricate, balanced, and The new science of metagenomics can help integrated entities that have a remarkable ability to us understand the role of microbial commu- adapt swiftly to environmental change. nities in human health and the environment. Historically, microbiology has focused on (Image courtesy of Michael Abbey) single species in pure laboratory culture, and thus understanding of microbial communities has lagged behind understanding of their individual mem- bers.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics and Its Impact on Science and Society: the Human Genome Project and Beyond
    DOE/SC-0083 Genomics and Its Impact on Science and Society The Human Genome Project and Beyond U.S. Department of Energy Genome Research Programs: genomics.energy.gov A Primer ells are the fundamental working units of every living system. All the instructions Cneeded to direct their activities are contained within the chemical DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). DNA from all organisms is made up of the same chemical and physical components. The DNA sequence is the particular side-by-side arrangement of bases along the DNA strand (e.g., ATTCCGGA). This order spells out the exact instruc- tions required to create a particular organism with protein complex its own unique traits. The genome is an organism’s complete set of DNA. Genomes vary widely in size: The smallest known genome for a free-living organism (a bac- terium) contains about 600,000 DNA base pairs, while human and mouse genomes have some From Genes to Proteins 3 billion (see p. 3). Except for mature red blood cells, all human cells contain a complete genome. Although genes get a lot of attention, the proteins DNA in each human cell is packaged into 46 chro- perform most life functions and even comprise the mosomes arranged into 23 pairs. Each chromosome is majority of cellular structures. Proteins are large, complex a physically separate molecule of DNA that ranges in molecules made up of chains of small chemical com- length from about 50 million to 250 million base pairs. pounds called amino acids. Chemical properties that A few types of major chromosomal abnormalities, distinguish the 20 different amino acids cause the including missing or extra copies or gross breaks and protein chains to fold up into specific three-dimensional rejoinings (translocations), can be detected by micro- structures that define their particular functions in the cell.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Genome Project Focus of the Human Genome Project
    TOOLS OF GENETIC RESEARCH THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT FOCUS OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT The primary work of the Human Genome Project has been to Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D.; produce three main research tools that will allow investigators to and Leslie Fink identify genes involved in normal biology as well as in both rare and common diseases. These tools are known as positional cloning The Human Genome Project is an ambitious research effort aimed at deciphering the chemical makeup of the entire human (Collins 1992). These advanced techniques enable researchers to ge ne tic cod e (i.e. , the g enome). The primary wor k of the search for disease­linked genes directly in the genome without first having to identify the gene’s protein product or function. (See p ro j e c t i s t o d ev e lop t h r e e r e s e a r c h tool s t h a t w i ll a ll o w the article by Goate, pp. 217–220.) Since 1986, when researchers scientists to identify genes involved in both rare and common 2 diseases. Another project priority is to examine the ethical, first found the gene for chronic granulomatous disease through legal, and social implications of new genetic technologies and positional cloning, this technique has led to the isolation of consid­ to educate the public about these issues. Although it has been erably more than 40 disease­linked genes and will allow the identi­ in existence for less than 6 years, the Human Genome Project fication of many more genes in the future (table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • From the Human Genome Project to Genomic Medicine a Journey to Advance Human Health
    From the Human Genome Project to Genomic Medicine A Journey to Advance Human Health Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D. Director, NHGRI The Origin of “Genomics”: 1987 Genomics (1987) “For the newly developing discipline of [genome] mapping/sequencing (including the analysis of the information), we have adopted the term GENOMICS… ‘The Genome Institute’ Office for Human Genome Research 1988-1989 National Center for Human Genome Research 1989-1997 National Human Genome Research Institute 1997-present NHGRI: Circa 1990-2003 Human Genome Project NHGRI Today: Characteristic Features . Relatively young (~28 years) . Relatively small (~1.7% of NIH) . Unusual historical origins (think ‘Human Genome Project’) . Emphasis on ‘Team Science’ (think managed ‘consortia’) . Rapidly disseminating footprint (think ‘genomics’) . Novel societal/bioethics research component (think ‘ELSI’) . Over-achievers for trans-NIH initiatives (think ‘Common Fund’) . Vibrant (and large) Intramural Research Program A Quarter Century of Genomics Human Genome Sequenced for First Time by the Human Genome Project Genomic Medicine An emerging medical discipline that involves using genomic information about an individual as part of their clinical care (e.g., for diagnostic or therapeutic decision- making) and the other implications of that clinical use The Path to Genomic Medicine ? Human Realization of Genome Genomic Project Medicine Nature Nature Base Pairs to Bedside 2003 Heli201x to 1Health A Quarter Century of Genomics Human Genome Sequenced for First Time by the Human Genome Project
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genome Evolution Working Group
    Comparative Genome Evolution Working Group COMPARATIVE GENOME EVOLUTION MODIFIED PROPOSAL Introduction Analysis of comparative genomic sequence information from a well-chosen set of organisms is, at present, one of the most effective approaches available to advance biomedical research. The following document describes rationales and plans for selecting targets for genome sequencing that will provide insight into a number of major biological questions that broadly underlie major areas of research funded by the National Institutes of Health, including studies of gene regulation, understanding animal development, and understanding gene and protein function. Genomic sequence data is a fundamental information resource that is required to address important questions about biology: What is the genomic basis for the advent of major morphogenetic or physiological innovations during evolution? How have genomes changed with the addition of new features observed in the eukaryotic lineage, for example the development of an adaptive immune system, an organized nervous system, bilateral symmetry, or multicellularity? What are the genomic correlates or bases for major evolutionary phenomena such as evolutionary rates; speciation; genome reorganization, and origins of variation? Another vital use to which genomic sequence data are applied is the development of more robust information about important non-human model systems used in biomedical research, i.e. how can we identify conserved functional regions in the existing genome sequences of important non- mammalian model systems, so that we can better understand fundamental aspects of, for example, gene regulation, replication, or interactions between genes? NHGRI established a working group to provide the Institute with well-considered scientific thought about the genomic sequences that would most effectively address these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Prediction Using Deep Learning
    FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Gene prediction using Deep Learning Pedro Vieira Lamares Martins Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Informática e Computação Supervisor: Rui Camacho (FEUP) Second Supervisor: Nuno Fonseca (EBI-Cambridge, UK) July 22, 2018 Gene prediction using Deep Learning Pedro Vieira Lamares Martins Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Informática e Computação Approved in oral examination by the committee: Chair: Doctor Jorge Alves da Silva External Examiner: Doctor Carlos Manuel Abreu Gomes Ferreira Supervisor: Doctor Rui Carlos Camacho de Sousa Ferreira da Silva July 22, 2018 Abstract Every living being has in their cells complex molecules called Deoxyribonucleic Acid (or DNA) which are responsible for all their biological features. This DNA molecule is condensed into larger structures called chromosomes, which all together compose the individual’s genome. Genes are size varying DNA sequences which contain a code that are often used to synthesize proteins. Proteins are very large molecules which have a multitude of purposes within the individual’s body. Only a very small portion of the DNA has gene sequences. There is no accurate number on the total number of genes that exist in the human genome, but current estimations place that number between 20000 and 25000. Ever since the entire human genome has been sequenced, there has been an effort to consistently try to identify the gene sequences. The number was initially thought to be much higher, but it has since been furthered down following improvements in gene finding techniques. Computational prediction of genes is among these improvements, and is nowadays an area of deep interest in bioinformatics as new tools focused on the theme are developed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome Project–Write Issues, Enabling Inclusive Decision-Making on the Topics Mentioned Above (7)
    Human chromosomes and nucleus as visualized by scanning electron microscopy. Through open and ongoing dialogue, com- mon goals can be identified. Informed consent must take local and regional val- ues into account and enable true decision- making on particularly sensitive use of cells and DNA from certain sources. Finally, the highest biosafety standards should guide project work and safety for lab workers and research participants, and ecosystems should pervade the design process. A prior- ity will be cost reduction of both genome engineering and testing tools to aid in equi- POLICY FORUM table distribution of benefits—e.g., enabling research on crop plants and infectious agents and vectors in developing nations. GENOME ENGINEERING To ensure responsible innovation and on- going consideration of ELSI, a percentage of all research funds could be dedicated to these The Genome Project–Write issues, enabling inclusive decision-making on the topics mentioned above (7). In addi- We need technology and an ethical framework tion, there should be equitable distribution of any early and future benefits in view of on July 29, 2016 for genome-scale engineering diverse and pressing needs in different global regions. The broad scope and novelty of the By Jef D. Boeke,* George Church,* large-scale synthesis and editing of genomes. project call for consideration of appropriate Andrew Hessel,* Nancy J. Kelley,* Adam To this end, we propose the Human Genome regulation alongside development of the sci- Arkin, Yizhi Cai, Rob Carlson, Aravinda Project–Write (HGP-write), named to honor ence and societal debates. National and in- Chakravarti, Virginia W. Cornish, Liam HGP-read but embracing synthesis of all ternational laws and regulations differ, and Holt, Farren J.
    [Show full text]
  • "An Overview of Gene Identification: Approaches, Strategies, and Considerations"
    An Overview of Gene Identification: UNIT 4.1 Approaches, Strategies, and Considerations Modern biology has officially ushered in a new era with the completion of the sequencing of the human genome in April 2003. While often erroneously called the “post-genome” era, this milestone truly marks the beginning of the “genome era,” a time in which the availability of sequence data for many genomes will have a significant effect on how science is performed in the 21st century. While complete human sequence data is now available at an overall accuracy of 99.99%, the mere availability of all of these As, Cs, Ts, and Gs still does not answer some of the basic questions regarding the human genome—how many genes actually comprise the genome, how many of these genes code for multiple gene products, and where those genes actually lie along the complement of human chromosomes. Current estimates, based on preliminary analyses of the draft sequence, place the number of human genes at ∼30,000 (International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2001). This number is in stark contrast to previously-suggested estimates, which had ranged as high as 140,000. A number that is in the 30,000 range brings into question the one-gene, one-protein hypothesis, underscoring the importance of processes such as alternative splicing in the generation of multiple gene products from a single gene. Finding all of the genes and the positions of those genes within the human genome sequence—and in other model organism genome sequences as well—requires the devel- opment and application of robust computational methods, some of which are listed in Table 4.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Prediction and Verification in a Compact Genome with Numerous Small Introns
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 9, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Methods Gene prediction and verification in a compact genome with numerous small introns Aaron E. Tenney,1 Randall H. Brown,1 Charles Vaske,1,4 Jennifer K. Lodge,2 Tamara L. Doering,3 and Michael R. Brent1,5 1Laboratory for Computational Genomics and Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA; 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA; 3Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1093, USA The genomes of clusters of related eukaryotes are now being sequenced at an increasing rate, creating a need for accurate, low-cost annotation of exon–intron structures. In this paper, we demonstrate that reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) and direct sequencing based on predicted gene structures satisfy this need, at least for single-celled eukaryotes. The TWINSCAN gene prediction algorithm was adapted for the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans by using a precise model of intron lengths in combination with ungapped alignments between the genome sequences of the two closely related Cryptococcus varieties. This approach resulted in ∼60% of known genes being predicted exactly right at every coding base and splice site. When previously unannotated TWINSCAN predictions were tested by RT–PCR and direct sequencing, 75% of targets spanning two predicted introns were amplified and produced high-quality sequence. When targets spanning the complete predicted open reading frame were tested, 72% of them amplified and produced high-quality sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioinformatic Analysis of Cis-Encoded Antisense Transcription
    BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF CIS-ENCODED ANTISENSE TRANSCRIPTION by Anca Sorana Morrissy B.Sc., Simon Fraser University, 2002 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Medical Genetics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2010 © Anca Sorana Morrissy, 2010 Abstract A key first step in understanding cellular processes is a quantitative and comprehensive measurement of gene expression profiles. The scale and complexity of the mammalian transcriptome is a significant challenge to efforts aiming to identify the complete set of expressed transcripts. Specifically, detection of low-abundance sequences, such as antisense transcripts, has historically been difficult to achieve using EST libraries, microarrays, or tag sequencing methods. Antisense transcripts are expressed from the opposite strand of a partner gene, and in some cases can regulate the processing of the sense transcript, highlighting their biological relevance. Recently, efficient profiling of low-frequency transcripts was made possible with the advent of next generation sequencing platforms. Thus, a major goal of my thesis was to assess the prevalence of antisense transcripts using Tag-seq, a tag sequencing method modified to take advantage of the Illumina sequencing platform. The increase in sampling depth provided by Tag-seq resulted in significantly improved detection of low abundance antisense transcripts, and allowed accurate measurements of their differential expression across normal and cancerous states. While antisense transcription is known to regulate sense transcript processing at a small number of loci, no genome wide assessments of this regulatory interaction exist. I addressed this knowledge gap using Affymetrix exon arrays, and found a significant correlation between antisense transcription and alternative splicing in normal human cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Model-Based Integration of Genomics and Metabolomics Reveals SNP Functionality in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
    Model-based integration of genomics and metabolomics reveals SNP functionality in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ove Øyåsa,b,1, Sonia Borrellc,d,1, Andrej Traunerc,d,1, Michael Zimmermanne, Julia Feldmannc,d, Thomas Liphardta,b, Sebastien Gagneuxc,d, Jörg Stellinga,b, Uwe Sauere, and Mattia Zampierie,2 aDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; bSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; cDepartment of Medical Parasitoloy and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; dUniversity of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; and eInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland Edited by Ralph R. Isberg, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, and approved March 2, 2020 (received for review September 12, 2019) Human tuberculosis is caused by members of the Mycobacterium infection of macrophages (29–32). Beyond analyses of individual tuberculosis complex (MTBC) that vary in virulence and transmis- laboratory strains, however, no systematic characterization and sibility. While genome-wide association studies have uncovered comparative analysis of intrinsic metabolic differences across several mutations conferring drug resistance, much less is known human-adapted MTBC clinical strains has been performed. about the factors underlying other bacterial phenotypes. Variation If the metabolic and other phenotypic diversity between in the outcome of tuberculosis infection and diseases has been MTBC strains contributes to and modulates pathogenicity, an attributed primarily to patient and environmental factors, but obvious question is: Which elements of the limited genetic di- recent evidence indicates an additional role for the genetic diver- versity in the MTBC are responsible for phenotypic strain di- sity among MTBC clinical strains.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.047/6.878 Lecture 4: Comparative Genomics I: Genome Annotation Using Evolutionary Signatures
    6.047/6.878 Lecture 4: Comparative Genomics I: Genome Annotation Using Evolutionary Signatures Mark Smith (Partially adapted from notes by: Angela Yen, Christopher Robde, Timo Somervuo and Saba Gul) 9/18/12 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Motivation and Challenge......................................4 1.2 Importance of many closely{related genomes...........................4 2 Conservation of genomic sequences5 2.1 Functional elements in Drosophila .................................5 2.2 Rates and patterns of selection...................................5 3 Excess Constraint 6 3.1 Causes of Excess Constraint.....................................7 3.2 Modeling Excess Constraint.....................................8 3.3 Excess Constraint in the Human Genome.............................9 3.4 Examples of Excess Constraint................................... 10 4 Diversity of evolutionary signatures: An Overview of Selection Patterns 10 4.1 Selective Pressures On Different Functional Elements....................... 11 5 Protein{Coding Signatures 12 5.1 Reading{Frame Conservation (RFC)................................ 13 5.2 Codon{Substitution Frequencies (CSFs).............................. 14 5.3 Classification of Drosophila Genome Sequences.......................... 16 5.4 Leaky Stop Codons.......................................... 17 6 microRNA (miRNA) genes 19 6.1 Computational Challenge...................................... 20 6.2 Unusual miRNA Genes........................................ 21 7 Regulatory Motifs 22 7.1 Computationally Detecting
    [Show full text]