The 'Town Life'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 'Town Life' Department of Archaeology Silchester Insula IX The ‘Town Life’ Project 2011 Michael Fulford, Amanda Clarke & Sarah Lucas Our fifteenth season of excavation The late Iron Age on Insula IX in July and August 2011 saw excellent progress in uncovering c. 40 BC – AD 44 Until the ‘Town Life’ Project, the earliest evidence evidence for the occupation of Calleva for the occupation of the Calleva promontory came in the late Iron Age and earliest from the 1980s excavations beneath the forum Roman period up to the episode of basilica in the heart of the town. This produced no finds to suggest occupation before 20/10BC. destruction which we are associating However, historical evidence provides the context with the period of the Boudican for an earlier date for the origin of Calleva. The British Atrebates are assumed to have originated revolt of AD 60/1. The Iron Age from a Gallic Atrebates settled in northern France. evidence is gradually being revealed, Their leader at the time of the wars between Rome as we work across from the west to and Gaul in the 50s BC was Commius. the east in the north and south of the trench. Significant structures and extensive deposits of earliest Roman occupation continue to be excavated above the Iron Age occupation across the eastern half of the trench. Commius coin distribution in relation to Calleva 1 Once an ally of Rome, he fell out with Julius Caesar and fled to Britain with his retinue in about 52 BC. The archaeological evidence for his presence in Britain is represented by coins carrying his name which have been found in small numbers in central southern England. These do not contradict the possi- bility that Commius was at Calleva, but to date there has been no firm evidence for settlement as early as 50 BC. However, three important developments emerged during the course of the 2011 season: Chronology The late Iron Age ditch which we began to excavate in 2010 has been explored further. It extends north- west from the southern edge of the trench for 40m before its course is obscured in a complexity of occu- pation. It is V-shaped in profile with a depth of about 1.0 metres and there is an ‘ankle-breaker’ cut at the bottom. While there remain uncertainties about how the ditch behaves at its northern end, it is now clear that it is the earliest significant feature of the Iron Age occupation. What its purpose was, whether it represented an early division of land across the Calleva promontory, or it formed part of a defensive enclosure, is unclear, but it was a major feature of the landscape. Finds are sparsely represented in its lower fills, but the upper deposits are rich in the pottery and other finds which are consistent with the earliest finds from the excavation beneath the forum basilica in the 1980s. These could not be dated earlier than about 20/10 BC. Since the ditch in Insula IX had largely silted up before rubbish was deposited in it, the date of its creation is sometime earlier than about 20-10 BC. How much earlier is difficult to esti- mate, but some 10-20 years, at least, seems plausible. By extrapolation this takes the date of its initial excavation back to about 40 BC. Developments after the silting of the ditch have to be considered from the south-west and north-west quadrants of the excavation separately. While the trend of development in both areas is the same with each sharing the same broad chronology, we cannot yet impose a single, site-wide chronology until we have excavated more and linked the two areas. Cover image: Kite photo by Geraint Jones. Left: Looking north-west across the excavation towards the end of the season. Right: Photo highlighting the Iron Age ditch (looking south-east). 2 South-west By the turn of the 1st century BC/1st century AD the N ditch seems to have lost its importance or to have been forgotten. A large timber building with late Augustan pottery was constructed across its course and at right angles to it at the southern end of the trench. Its western end is adjacent to, and at right angles to a linear slot oriented north-west/south-east and extending some 23.5 metres across the trench. There are traces of a parallel structure to the west and the pair appears to define a street or lane, some 3.5 metres in width, of the late Iron Age town. We interpret these slots as the construction trenches for fences which were in due course replaced by more robust structures employing substantial posts, but maintaining a similar width of 3.5 metres for the street. The rear wall of the building is hard against, if not actually part of the eastern row of posts. Gravel surface Beam slot or fenceline Post hole 0 20 metres Well Beam slot Post hole Pit with charcoal-rich fill Pit Ditch or gully Clay floor Emerging clay floor Cesspit Gravel surface 0 20 metres Aerial photo showing NW-SE Street and Iron Age building, looking north-west. 3 In addition to the major building the area to the east of the street contains a number of rubbish pits filled with pottery and other finds of Augusto-Tiberian date. While some to the north respect the line of the construction trench, others clearly lie within the pre- sumed footprint of the building. However, the latter group also appears to respect the (shallower) con- struction trench of a possible second timber building constructed on a slightly different alignment. While more work needs to be done on the relationships between the two buildings and with the rubbish pits, and on their chronology, the 2011 season revealed evidence of a further post-built structure which ran, more or less at right angles, across the line of the more prominent of the two buildings. Further excava- tion will clarify whether this is part of a building or a post line. Thus, in the south-west quadrant, in addi- tion to the complexities associated with at least two distinct phases of development of the street, there is a sequence of three timber structures, of which two at least appear to be the remains of buildings. Further work on the finds from the rubbish pits may help to refine the chronological sequence, but it is clear that the vast majority of the features excavated in the south-west area in 2010 and 2011 are pre-AD 43 in date. North-west The complexities of the development of the site in the late Iron Age are further borne out by discoveries in the north-west quadrant of the trench where excava- tion beneath the north-east/south-west-oriented street or lane has revealed evidence of another, substantial rectangular timber building, as well as other struc- tures. Although we do not yet have dating evidence for this structure, its presence indicates that the setting out of the north-east/south-west lane was secondary to a phase of occupation and, very prob- ably, secondary to the north-west/south-east street, where we have not yet found evidence of any underly- ing buildings. This is supported by the discovery in 2010 of a cluster of pits containing Augusto-Tiberian pottery right at the point where street and lane are projected to intersect. The 2011 season also revealed a spur, defined by shallow, parallel ditches, 3.5 metres apart, of the north-east/south-west lane. It ran off at right angles towards the centre of the excavated area. Whether it is contemporary with or secondary to the creation of the north-east/south-west lane is yet to be established. Thus in the north-west we have evidence of an Iron Age building, possibly associated with the cluster of early rubbish pits, before the lane and its associated spur, which strikes towards the Photo showing NW lane, looking north-east. 4 1 north-east, was laid out. While evidence is emerging of at least two phases of ditches defining this lane, Claudio-Neronian (c. AD 40-60) pottery has been identified in some of the later ditch fills which flank the north-east trending lane. The overall pattern is of increasing density of occupation reflected in the subdivision into smaller properties by the creation of new lanes and boundaries. The makings of a sequence While the course of the north-west/south-east street runs slightly obliquely to that of the earlier ditch it seems to have continued as a key structure of the late Iron Age settlement, respected by the earliest build- ings and associated rubbish pits of Augusto-Tiberian Well Beam slot Post hole Pit with charcoal-rich fill Pit Ditch or gully Clay floor Emerging clay floor date in both the north-west and south-west areas. The Cesspit Gravel surface 0 202 creation of the second lane running to the north-east metres and its associated spur indicate an intensification of occupation within the excavated area in the second quarter of the 1st century AD. 1. c. 40-20 BC: ‘Early’ defensive or boundary ditch 2. c. 20-10 BC: Establishment of north-west/south-east street 3. c. 20 BC – AD 20: Rectangular buildings and associ- ated rubbish pits in the south-west and north-west 4. c. AD 20-44: North-east trending lane established at right angles to ‘axial’ north-west/south-east street N 4 Gravel surface Beam slot or fenceline Post hole 0 20 metres 3 Well Beam slot Post hole Pit with charcoal-rich fill Pit Ditch or gully Clay floor Emerging clay floor Cesspit Gravel surface 0 20 metres Pit Beam-slot/fenceline Gravel surface Post hole Ditch/gully 0 20 metres Pit with charcoal-rich fill Well Beam slot Post hole Pit with charcoal-rich fill Emerging clay floor Pit Previous phase Clay floor Emerging clay floor 5 Cesspit Gravel surface 0 20 metres for buildings is that much work remains to be done Earliest Roman in excavating the remains of the succeeding, civilian phase of the town, our Period 1.
Recommended publications
  • The Commentaries of Caesar, by Anthony Trollope
    Project Gutenberg's The Commentaries of Caesar, by Anthony Trollope This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Commentaries of Caesar Author: Anthony Trollope Release Date: November 9, 2017 [EBook #55926] Language: English *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE COMMENTARIES OF CAESAR *** Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Books project.) Ancient Classics for English Readers EDITED BY THE REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS, M.A. C Æ S A R The Volumes published of this Series contain HOMER: THE ILIAD, BY THE EDITOR. HOMER: THE ODYSSEY, BY THE SAME. HERODOTUS, BY GEORGE C. SWAYNE, M.A. Late Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. The following Authors, by various Contributors, are in preparation:— VIRGIL. HORACE. ÆSCHYLUS. SOPHOCLES. ARISTOPHANES. CICERO. JUVENAL. XENOPHON. OTHERS WILL FOLLOW. A Volume will be published on the 1st of every alternate Month, price 2s. 6d. T H E C O M M E N T A R I E S OF C Æ S A R BY ANTHONY TROLLOPE WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCLXX CONTENTS. CHAP. PAGE I. INTRODUCTION, 1 FIRST BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CÆSAR DRIVES FIRST THE SWISS AND II. 28 THEN THE GERMANS OUT OF GAUL.—B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Coin Inscriptions and the Origins of Writing in Pre-Roman Britain1 Jonathan Williams
    COIN INSCRIPTIONS AND THE ORIGINS OF WRITING IN PRE-ROMAN BRITAIN1 JONATHAN WILLIAMS Introduction THE subject of writing in pre-Roman Britain has, until recently, been the object of curious neglect among archaeologists and historians. One simple reason for this is that there is not very much of it in evidence. There are no lapidary inscriptions, and only a few, short graffiti and other scraps of evidence (on which see more below). Contrast this with the situation after the Roman conquest, and the overwhelming impression is that pre-Roman Britain was essentially a pre-literate society, and that writing was brought to Britain by the Romans. And yet there is the not inconsiderable corpus of coin legends from pre-Roman Britain which, if allowed to do so, might seem to tell a rather different story. The object of this paper is to see what kind of story that might be. It has always been a major blind-spot of numismatists, and increasingly archaeologists too since they stopped reading ancient texts, that they tend not to think very much about coin legends other than as a key to attributing the coin to a particular tribe, city or ruler. One result of this is that it seems to have gone more or less unremarked upon in most treatments of late iron-age Britain that the coin legends that appear on the coins in the late first century BC are the first, and by far the largest, body of evidence for the introduction of writing into these islands and of its uses in the pre-Roman period.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar's War Commentaries
    Julius Caesar, Gallic Wars1 the Atrebates and the Veromandui, their neighbors, were there awaiting Julius Caesar was a Roman politician. He was elected consul in 59 the arrival of the Romans; for they had persuaded both these nations to BCE, and sent himself as the commander of a military expedition to try the same fortune of war [as themselves]: that the forces of the conquer Gaul (present-day France and Germany); he spend 58-51 BCE in Gaul and successfully conquered it, as well as Britain. His Aduatuci were also expected by them, and were on their march; that military success was helpful as a political asset against his rivals. He they had put their women, and those who through age appeared useless returned to Rome in 49 BCE and refused to disband his army; this led to civil war in which he successfully seized power. He was for war, in a place to which there was no approach for an army, on assassinated in 44 BCE. account of the marshes. The Gallic Wars was written by Julius Caesar himself (even though it refers to him in the third-person) and was published during [2.17]Having learned these things, he sends forward scouts and his lifetime, probably as a form of political self-promotion. The text centurions to choose a convenient place for the camp. And as a great seems to have been adapted from his original dispatches sent back to the Senate while the campaigns were going on.2 many of the surrounding Belgae and other Gauls, following Caesar, marched with him; some of these, as was afterwards learned from the Book 2 - (57 B.C.) prisoners,
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Celtic Consumption: Roman Influence on Faunal-Based Diets of the Atrebates
    CHANGES IN CELTIC CONSUMPTION: ROMAN INFLUENCE ON FAUNAL-BASED DIETS OF THE ATREBATES by Alexander Frey Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Archaeology and Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Alexander Frey All rights reserved ii CHANGES IN CELTIC CONSUMPTION: ROMAN INFLUENCE ON FAUNAL DIETS OF THE ATREBATES Alexander Frey, B.A. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 2016 This study addresses cultural impacts of the Roman Empire on the British Celtic group, the Atrebates. The Atrebates held large portions of land in southern Britain, and upon Roman invasion in A.D. 43, became a client kingdom of the Roman Empire. With Roman rule also came Roman animal husbandry and consumption habits, reflected in archaeological faunal remains. To better understand this dietary transition, 23 faunal datasets were analyzed from within and around the capital city of Calleva Atrebatum, spanning from the pre-Roman Britain Iron Age to the post-Roman Saxon Age. In the analysis, published Number of Individual Specimens (NISP) and Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) values were assessed to examine changes in the prominence of sheep, pigs, and cattle over time. This research demonstrates the pervasive impact of the Roman Empire on populations with whom they interacted, changing not only governing bodies, but also dietary practices. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the wonderful help and support from my friends and family during the process of writing this thesis. Special thanks to my readers, Dr. David A.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAYBOOK by Andrew Ruhnke and Volko Ruhnke
    COIN Series, Volume VI PLAYBOOK by Andrew Ruhnke and Volko Ruhnke TABLE OF CONTENTS Falling Sky Tutorial . 2 Credits . .. 45 Roles and Strategy . 18 Card List . 46 Non-Player Examples . 20 Countersheet Scan . 47 Design Notes . 26 Tribes and Forces . 48 Event Text and Notes . 32 © 2015 GMT Games, LLC • P .O . Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www .GMTGames .com 2 Falling Sky — PLAYBOOK the Forces display; the Germans do not track Victory; 7 .0 .) Go ahead Falling Sky Tutorial and put four cylinders and those three markers on the Edge Track numbers as noted in that setup section . (If you have not punched First-time players should start here! out the counters, punch what you need as we go .) Welcome to the tutorial for Falling Sky . It will walk you through setup and some game play step by step, getting you going with the Next is the Senate and Legions Track, some red boxes at lower right core mechanics and demonstrating a few of the options available to of the board . We will account here for the attitude of the Senate in each faction . Our purpose here is merely to teach concepts, not to Rome toward Caesar, meaning toward the Roman venture in Gaul suggest optimal strategy—we will leave that to you! (6 .5) . As noted in the Setup, place the Senate marker at “Intrigue” (“Firm” side down) . If you would like to look up specific Rules of Play as we go, we provide the relevant reference numbers in parentheses . Now find the 12 Legions—red cubes—among the Roman forces pieces and move them to the Legions track .
    [Show full text]
  • The Siege of Alesia —­ Living Rules 12-20-07  the GREAT BATTLES of HISTORY Vol
    The Siege of Alesia — Living Rules 12-20-07 The GREAT BATTLES OF HISTORY Vol. XI The Siege of ALESIA Gaul, 52 B.C. Proconsul Gaius Julius Caesar vs. Vercingetorix, Chieftain of the Arverni and Commius, King of the Atrebati Living Rules 12-20-07 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................... 2 10.0 The Effects of Combat .................................... 21 2.0 Game Components, Terminology and 11.0 Victory ............................................................. 23 General Information ........................................ 2 12.0 The Scenarios .................................................. 23 3.0 The Sequence of Play ...................................... 5 Questions? ................................................................ 25 4.0 Leaders and Command ................................... 5 Credits ...................................................................... 25 5.0 Activation ........................................................ 8 Player’s Notes .......................................................... 25 6.0 Movement and Terrain .................................... 10 Historical Scenario Example Deployment ............... 26 7.0 Facing and ZOCs ............................................ 14 Historical Notes ....................................................... 27 8.0 Missile Combat ............................................... 15 Countersheet Scans .................................................. 29 9.0 Shock Combat ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vergil & Caesar Name of Assignment
    Course Number (when applicable) Course Title AP Latin - Vergil & Caesar Name of Assignment (title of book(s), Author, Edition, and ISBN (when applicable) The Gallic War: Seven Commentaries (English), Carolyn Hammond ISBN 10: 199540268 Expectations/Instructions for Student When Completing Assignment Read the English of Caesar’s Gallic War Books 1, 6, and 7 (summaries of books 2-5 provided) and answer the ​ ​ questions in the attached reading packet (pdf). It might be helpful to answer the reading questions as you read through the text. reading questions (pdf) One Essential Question for Assignment What should we expect from comentarii in form and content - how does Caesar confirm and challenge these ​ ​ expectations? What point of view does Caesar take when describing actions? One Enduring Understanding for Assignment Caesar adapts the characters, structures, and tropes of historical prose to create a uniquely Roman commentary and define basic tenets of ‘Romanness’, as well as structure of Latin literature and language Parent Role and Expectations Students work independently. Estimated Time Requirement Approximately 1 week per English Book Questions for the English Reading of Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars Answer questions in complete sentences. Book I 1. Outline each of the following territories in the colors indicated: Belgae (blue); Celts/ Gauls (yellow), Aquitani (red): Figure 1: The Roman Provinces in Gaul around 58 BC; note that the coastline shown here is the modern one, different from the ancient coastline in some parts of the English Channel 2. Who was Orgetorix and what were his ambitions? 3. Why did Orgetotix commit suicide? 4. What actions or preparations did the Helvetii make before leaving their homeland? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Week 11: Scribe's Translation
    Week 11: Scribe’s Translation Kevin Esherick Caesar, De Bello Gallico (DBG), Book 4.35, Lines 1-9; Book 4.36, Line 1; Book 5.24, Lines 1-22; Book 5.25, Lines 1-13; Book 5.26, Lines 1-14; Book 5.27, Lines 1-26 Mueller Textbook, pp. 76-77; 82-92 Book 4.35 [1] Caesar, etsī idem quod superiōribus diēbus acciderat fore Caesar, although he was seeing that the same thing which had happened in the previous days would happen, vidēbat, ut, sī essent hostēs pulsī, celeritāte perīculum effugerent, that if the enemies had been driven back, they would escape danger with swiftness, tamen nactus equitēs circiter XXX, quōs Commius Atrebas, dē nevertheless having found around 30 cavalrymen, whom Commius the Atrebatian, about quō ante dictum est, sēcum trānsportāverat, legiōnēs in aciē whom it had been mentioned before, had transported with himself, he [Caesar] set up his legions [5] prō castrīs cōnstituit. Commīssō proeliō, diūtius nostrōrum in battle lines in front of camp. With the battle having been begun, the enemies were not able mīlitum impetum hostēs ferre nōn potuērunt āc terga vertērunt. to withstand the attack of our soldiers for very long and they turned their backs. Quōs tantō spatiō secūtī quantum cursū et vīribus efficere [Our men] having pursued them [quos] for so great a distance as they were able to do by their speed and manliness, potuērunt, complūrēs ex eīs occīdērunt, deinde omnibus longē killed several of these men, then with all buildings far and wide lātēque aedificiīs incēnsīs sē in castra recēpērunt.
    [Show full text]
  • The A, B, C of the Classical Series of Coins Under Tincomarus
    THE A, B, C OF THE CLASSICAL SERIES OF COINS UNDER TINCOMARUS DAVID WOODS TINCOMARUS, who declared himself to be a COM(mii).F(ilius) (‘son of Commius’) upon much of his coinage, ruled a region around Chichester, Noviomagus Reginorum under the Romans, sometime probably about 25 BC–AD 10.1 He struck coinage in gold and silver, two denomina- tions in each, staters and quarter staters in gold, and a unit and minim in silver, to call them by their modern terms. According to the most recent catalogue, he struck 7 types of stater, 9 types of quarter stater, 12 types of silver unit, and 4 types of minim, and this coinage has been divided into four successive series on the basis of its changing style and themes – the Celtic, Proto-Classical, Classical and Crude.2 It has been argued that ‘striking quality, metallurgy, and distribution indicate that the Crude and Classical series were probably from the same mint’, and that ‘it is only in the Celtic series that other mints can be suggested’. 3 Consequently, it is the working assumption here that all of the coins of the Classical series were produced at the same mint, even though no detailed die-study has yet been published to prove this beyond a doubt. Bearing this in mind, the purpose of this article is to investigate the potential sig- nificance of a number of isolated letters – A, B, or C – that occur on the obverse of three different coins in the Classical series, on a quarter stater, a silver unit, and a minim.
    [Show full text]
  • ALESIA 52 BC the Final Struggle for Gaul
    ALESIA 52 BC The final struggle for Gaul NIC FIELDS ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CAMPAIGN 269 ALESIA 52 BC The final struggle for Gaul NIC FIELDS ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS Series editor Marcus Cowper © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 A clash of cultures CHRONOLOGY 13 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 17 Vercingetorix Caesar OPPOSING ARMIES 22 Vercingetorix’s army Caesar’s army OPPOSING PLANS 33 Vercingetorix’s plan Caesar’s plan THE CAMPAIGN 37 The siege of Avaricum A close-run thing: Gergovia Noviodunum The final act: Alesia AFTERMATH 82 Counting the cost Vercingetorix’s legacy THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 87 Alesia alternatives A parallel in history GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS 91 Glossary Abbreviations BIBLIOGRAPHY 93 INDEX 95 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com The Roman Empire at the time of Caesar’s firstconsulship The RomanEmpireatthetimeofCaesar’s N OCEANUS ATLANTICUS Pontus Euxinus GALLIA GALLIA CISALPINA BITHYNIA ILLYRICUM TRANSALPINA ET PONTUS Mare HISPANIA ITALIA Adriaticum Galatia CITERIOR SARDINIA Roma Cappadocia ET MACEDONIA CORSICA Mare ASIA HISPANIA Mare Aegaeum CILICIA SYRIA ULTERIOR Tyrrhenum Mare Ionium SICILIA Numidia AFRICA CRETA Mauretania Mare Internum CYRENE Egypt Sinus Arabicus Approximate provincial boundaries SYRIA Roman province Egypt Principal ‘client’ kingdoms 0 500 miles 0 500km © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION The desire by political and military leaders to be known to the generations to come and, naturally, to cast him or herself in a good light, is no recent phenomenon. Such memoirs are by nature subjective and complete adherence to the truth should not be expected, especially if the author had written memoranda with at least one eye on the future record.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar's Invasion of Britain / Nathan Braman
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OPUS: Open Uleth Scholarship - University of Lethbridge Research Repository University of Lethbridge Research Repository OPUS http://opus.uleth.ca Theses Arts and Science, Faculty of 2011 Caesar's invasion of Britain / Nathan Braman Braman, Nathan Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of History, c2011 http://hdl.handle.net/10133/2595 Downloaded from University of Lethbridge Research Repository, OPUS CAESAR’S INVASION OF BRITAIN NATHAN BRAMAN Bachelor of Arts, University of Lethbridge, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS History Department University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Nathan Braman, 2011 Abstract This paper examines the Roman invasions of and interactions with Britain in the mid first century BCE and early first century CE and evaluates the results. Specifically, this paper analyzes motives and the actual military events of the invasions of Julius Caesar in 55 and 54 BCE and evaluates their aftermath, leading up to the invasion of Claudius in 43 CE. Caesar’s stated motive for launching the invasion was to prevent the islanders from interfering in the new Roman order being constructed in Gaul. However, as will be shown, Caesar’s more personal motives, in the form of a desire for wealth and glory, played as much if not more of a role in the launching of these expeditions. In light of these motives, the invasions can be defined, at best, as partial successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Venta Belgarum: What Is in the Name for Roman Winchester?
    Chapter 1 Venta Belgarum: What Is in the Name for Roman Winchester? Anthony C. King The name for Roman Winchester, Venta Belgarum, has been known for cent- uries, and the attribution of the name to modern Winchester has not been in question in any significant way. The purpose of this brief chapter about Bar- bara Yorke’s home town is to look at the two elements of the name, to reflect on recent scholarship, and to make a proposal concerning the second, ‘tribal’ component. An essential starting point is the entry for Venta Belgarum in A.L.F. Rivet and Colin Smith’s Place-Names of Roman Britain,1 in which the name is given as Venta (Ouenta in Greek transliteration) by Ptolemy,2 Venta Belgarum or Vel- garum in the Antonine Itinerary,3 Venta Velgarom in the Ravenna Cosmography,4 and also as Venta by Bede.5 The last in this list links Venta to Wintancaestir and provides the strongest early medieval evidence for continuity of the first ele- ment of the Roman name into the modern toponym.6 In addition, the Notitia Dignitatum lists a ‘Procurator gynaecii in Britannis Ventensis (var. bentensis)’.7 This Venta is Winchester, in all probability, but two others, Venta Icenorum (Caister St Edmund, Norfolk) and Venta Silurum (Caerwent, South Wales), are 1 A.L.F. Rivet and Colin Smith, The Place-Names of Roman Britain (London, 1979), p. 492. 2 Ptolemy, Geography, ii.3.13, ed. C. Müller (Paris 1883–1901). See also G.R. Isaac, Place-Names in Ptolemy’s Geography (Aberystwyth, 2004), CD-ROM s.v.
    [Show full text]