Tree and Brush Control for County Road

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tree and Brush Control for County Road Tree and Brush Control - For - County Road Right-of-Way Iowa Highway Research Board Iowa Department of Transportation Roadside Management Program University of Northern Iowa Project No. TR-462 Final Report October, 2002 Roadside Management Program, University of Northern Iowa • Principal Investigators • Wade H. Williams • Kirk Henderson Iowa Highway Research Board Advisory Committee • Buchanan County • Brian Keierleber, Engineer • Greg Schmitt, Roadside Manager • Clayton County • Jerry Weber, Engineer (chair) • Dallas County • Doug Sheeley, Roadside Biologist Disclaimer: The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Iowa Department of Transportation. Abstract This manual summarizes the roadside tree and brush control methods used by all of Iowa's 99 counties. It is based on interviews conducted in Spring 2002 with county engineers, roadside managers and others. The target audience of this manual is the novice county engineer or roadside manager. Iowa law is nearly silent on roadside tree and brush control, so individual counties have been left to decide on the level of control they want to achieve and maintain. Different solutions have been developed but the goal of every county remains the same: to provide safe roads for the traveling public. Counties in eastern and southern Iowa appear to face the greatest brush control challenge. Most control efforts can be divided into two categories: mechanical and chemical. Mechanical control includes cutting tools and supporting equipment. A chain saw is the most widely used cutting tool. Tractor mounted boom mowers and brush cutters are used to prune miles of brush but have significant safety and aesthetic limitations and boom mowers are easily broken by inexperienced operators. The advent of tree shears and hydraulic thumbs offer unprecedented versatility. Bulldozers are often considered a method of last resort since they reduce large areas to bare ground. Any chipper that violently grabs brush should not be used. Chemical control is the application of herbicide to different parts of a plant: foliar spray is applied to leaves; basal bark spray is applied to the tree trunk; a cut stump treatment is applied to the cambium ring of a cut surface. There is reluctance by many to apply herbicide into the air due to drift concerns. One-third of Iowa counties do not use foliar spray. By contrast, several accepted control methods are directed toward the ground. Freshly cut stumps should be treated to prevent resprouting. Basal bark spray is highly effective in sensitive areas such as near houses. Interest in chemical control is slowly increasing as herbicides and application methods are refined. Fall burning, a third, distinctly separate technique is underused as a brush control method and can be effective if timed correctly. In all, control methods tend to reflect agricultural patterns in a county. The use of chain saws and foliar sprays tends to increase in counties where row crops predominate, and boom mowing tends to increase in counties where grassland predominates. For counties with light to moderate roadside brush, rotational maintenance is the key to effective control. The most comprehensive approach to control is to implement an integrated roadside vegetation management (IRVM) program. An IRVM program is usually directed by a Roadside Manager whose duties may be shared with another position. Funding for control programs comes from the Rural Services Basic portion of a county's budget. The average annual county brush control budget is about $76,000. That figure is thought not to include shared expenses such as fuel and buildings. Start up costs for an IRVM program are less if an existing control program is converted. In addition, IRVM budgets from three different northeastern Iowa counties are offered for comparison in this manual. The manual also includes a chapter on temporary traffic control in rural work zones, a summary of the Iowa Code as it relates to brush control, and rules on avoiding seasonal disturbance of the endangered Indiana bat. Appendices summarize survey and forest cover data, an equipment inventory, sample forms for record keeping, a sample brush control policy, a few legal opinions, a literature search, and a glossary. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 – Introduction .........................................................1 1.1 Defining the Objectives. ...................................................1 1.2 Determining the Level of Control............................................2 1.3 Getting Started ...........................................................3 1.4 Calendar of Operations (What to do when?) ...................................5 1.5 A Short History of Iowa Roadside Brush Control................................7 Section 2 – Traffic Control in Work Zones. ........................................12 2.1 Short term roadside work with no encroachment on the roadway...................13 2.2 Minor encroachment of a work zone onto a 2-lane road. .........................14 2.3 Major encroachment/lane closure on a gravel road. Traffic is self regulating. ....... 15 2.4 One lane closed of a 2-lane road. Closure less than ¼ mile long. ..................16 Section 3 – Mechanical Brush Control ............................................18 3.1 Mechanical Brush Control .................................................18 3.2 Safety and Mechanical Brush Control ........................................18 Cutting a Plant at Ground Level .................................................20 3.3 Hand Cutting ...........................................................20 3.4 String Trimmers & Brush Blades ...........................................21 3.5 Chain Saws ............................................................22 3.6 Tree Shears ............................................................25 3.7 Excavator Thumbs .......................................................27 3.8 Rotary Grass Mowers ....................................................29 Overhead Cutting .............................................................32 3.9 Telescopic Pruning Saw or Pole Saw ........................................32 3.10 Aerial Lift Trucks or “Bucket Trucks” .......................................34 3.11 Boom Mowers ..........................................................36 3.12 Brush Cutters ...........................................................38 3.13 The Limb Lopper ........................................................40 Removing a Plant by its Roots...................................................41 3.14 Grubbing ..............................................................41 3.15 Heavy Equipment .......................................................42 3.16 Mechanical Seeding ......................................................45 Brush Disposal...............................................................48 3.17 Brush Disposal ..........................................................48 Section 4 – Chemical Brush Control..............................................51 4.1 Methods of Chemical Brush Control .........................................51 4.2 Safety .................................................................54 4.3 Foliar Spray ............................................................57 Table 1. Herbicide nomenclature......................................60 Table 2. Foliar sprays used in Iowa....................................61 Table 3. Foliar spray product solutions to persistent trees and brush ..........62 i 4.4 Basal Bark Spray ........................................................64 Table 4. Basal bark products used in Iowa ................................65 Table 5. Basal bark product solutions to persistent trees and brush .............65 4.5 Cut Stump Treatment ....................................................66 Table 6. Cut stump products used in Iowa ................................67 4.6 Commonly Used Herbicides...............................................68 2,4-D .............................................................69 Dicamba...........................................................72 Fosamine Ammonium................................................74 Glyphosate ........................................................76 Imazapyr...........................................................78 Metsulfuron-methyl..................................................80 Picloram ..........................................................82 Triclopyr...........................................................84 Section 5 – Prescribed Burns....................................................86 Section 6 – Patterns of Brush Control in Iowa ......................................89 6.1 The Setting .............................................................89 6.2 Vegetation and Land Use Patterns...........................................93 6.3 Correlation: How Farming Patterns Tend to Predict Control Methods ...............94 Section 7 – Integrated Roadside Vegetation Management (IRVM) ......................97 7.1 Light Vegetation ........................................................98 7.2 Medium Vegetation.....................................................100 7.3 Heavy Vegetation ......................................................102 7.4 Establishing a Rotational Maintenance Plan..................................105 7.5 Documenting Work.....................................................106 7.6 Getting the Public Involved ...............................................107
Recommended publications
  • Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R
    Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R. Okie1 U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, 21 Dunbar Road, Byron, GA 31008 Recent utilization of genetic resources of peach [Prunus persica (‘Quetta’ from India, ‘John Rivers’ from England, and ‘Lippiatts’ (L.) Batsch] and Japanese plum (P. salicina Lindl. and hybrids) has from New Zealand) were critical to the development of modern been limited in the United States compared with that of many crops. nectarines in California (Taylor, 1959). However, most fresh-market Difficulties in collection, importation, and quarantine throughput have peach breeding programs in the United States have used germplasm limited the germplasm available. Prunus is more difficult to preserve developed in the United States for cultivar development (Okie, 1998). because more space is needed than for small fruit crops, and the shorter Only in New Jersey was there extensive hybridization with imported life of trees relative to other tree crops because of disease and insect clones, and most of these hybrids have not resulted in named cultivars problems. Lack of suitable rootstocks has also reduced tree life. The (Blake and Edgerton, 1946). trend toward fewer breeding programs, most of which emphasize In recent years, interest in collecting and utilizing novel germplasm “short-term” (long-term compared to most crops) commercial cultivar has increased. For example, non-melting clingstone peaches from development to meet immediate industry needs, has also contributed Mexico and Brazil have been used in the joint USDA–Univ. of to reduced use of exotic material. Georgia–Univ. of Florida breeding program for the development of Probably all modern commercial peaches grown in the United early ripening, non-melting, fresh-market peaches for low-chill areas States are related to ‘Chinese Cling’, a peach imported from China (Beckman and Sherman, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Goose Plum Prunus Hortulana ILLINOIS RANGE Tree in Flower
    wild goose plum Prunus hortulana Kingdom: Plantae FEATURES Division/Phylum: Magnoliophyta Wild goose plum is a small tree that may attain a Class: Magnoliopsida height of 20 feet and a trunk diameter of eight Order: Rosales inches. Its gray or brown bark becomes scaly at maturity. Twigs are slender, red-brown and smooth. Family: Rosaceae The ovoid, red-brown buds are about one-fourth ILLINOIS STATUS inch in length. Leaves are arranged alternately along the stem. These simple, oblong to oval leaves may common, native be as much as six inches long and two inches wide. Each leaf is finely-toothed along the edges. Each tooth has a gland at its tip. The leaf is green and smooth on the upper surface and pale and sometimes hairy on the lower surface. Flowers develop in clusters, up to one inch wide. The five- petaled, white flowers appear after the leaves are partly grown. The fruit is a drupe (a seed enclosed in a hard, dry material that in turn is covered with a fleshy material). The drupe is nearly spherical and up to one inch in diameter. This red, fleshy fruit is hard, bitter and contains one seed. BEHAVIORS © Guy Sternberg Wild goose plum may be found in the southern one- half of Illinois. It grows in wood edges and thickets. tree in flower Flowers are produced from March through April. The wood is hard and brown. ILLINOIS RANGE © Guy Sternberg flowering branches © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 29 Volume 13, December 2013 A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE MARY K. OXLEY NATURE CENTER, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Amy K. Buthod Oklahoma Biological Survey Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Robert Bebb Herbarium University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019-0575 (405) 325-4034 Email: [email protected] Keywords: flora, exotics, inventory ABSTRACT This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A total of 342 taxa from 75 families and 237 genera were collected from four main vegetation types. The families Asteraceae and Poaceae were the largest, with 49 and 42 taxa, respectively. Fifty-eight exotic taxa were found, representing 17% of the total flora. Twelve taxa tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION clayey sediment (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1977). Climate is Subtropical The objective of this study was to Humid, and summers are humid and warm inventory the vascular plants of the Mary K. with a mean July temperature of 27.5° C Oxley Nature Center (ONC) and to prepare (81.5° F). Winters are mild and short with a a list and voucher specimens for Oxley mean January temperature of 1.5° C personnel to use in education and outreach. (34.7° F) (Trewartha 1968). Mean annual Located within the 1,165.0 ha (2878 ac) precipitation is 106.5 cm (41.929 in), with Mohawk Park in northwestern Tulsa most occurring in the spring and fall County (ONC headquarters located at (Oklahoma Climatological Survey 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • (Prunus Spp) Using Random Amplified Microsatellite Polymorphism Markers
    Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships among wild and cultivated Tunisian plums (Prunus spp) using random amplified microsatellite polymorphism markers H. Ben Tamarzizt, S. Ben Mustapha, G. Baraket, D. Abdallah and A. Salhi-Hannachi Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Immunology & Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia Corresponding author: A. Salhi-Hannachi E-mail: [email protected] Genet. Mol. Res. 14 (1): 1942-1956 (2015) Received January 8, 2014 Accepted July 8, 2014 Published March 20, 2015 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.March.20.4 ABSTRACT. The usefulness of random amplified microsatellite polymorphism markers to study the genetic diversity and relationships among cultivars belonging to Prunus salicina and P. domestica and their wild relatives (P. insititia and P. spinosa) was investigated. A total of 226 of 234 bands were polymorphic (96.58%). The 226 random amplified microsatellite polymorphism markers were screened using 15 random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter-simple sequence repeat primers combinations for 54 Tunisian plum accessions. The percentage of polymorphic bands (96.58%), the resolving power of primers values (135.70), and the polymorphic information content demonstrated the efficiency of the primers used in this study. The genetic distances between accessions ranged from 0.18 to 0.79 with a mean of 0.24, suggesting a high level of genetic diversity at the intra- and interspecific levels. The unweighted pair group with arithmetic mean dendrogram Genetics and Molecular Research 14 (1): 1942-1956 (2015) ©FUNPEC-RP www.funpecrp.com.br Genetic diversity of Tunisian plums using RAMPO markers 1943 and principal component analysis discriminated cultivars efficiently and illustrated relationships and divergence between spontaneous, locally cultivated, and introduced plum types.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents and American Symbols
    KINDERGARTEN Core Knowledge Language Arts® • New York Edition • Listening & Learning™ Strand Presidents and American Symbols American and Presidents Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Read-Aloud Again!™ It Tell Presidents and American Symbols Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand KINDERGARTEN Core Knowledge Language Arts® New York Edition Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts is a trademark of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Commandant of the Marine Corps Approved a Change in the Words of the Fourth Line, First Verse, to Read, “In Air, on Land, and Sea.” Former Gunnery Sergeant H
    144278_LE_I_Student_Textbook_Cover .indd Letter V 8/6/19 5:32 AM LE-I TABLE OF CONTENTS Leadership Leadership Defined ....................................................................................................................................... 1 The Leader Within ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Leadership Primary and Secondary Objectives .......................................................................................... 11 Ethics, Morals, Values ................................................................................................................................ 15 Marine Corps’ Core Values ........................................................................................................................ 21 Using Introspection to Develop Leadership Traits ..................................................................................... 27 Military Leadership Traits .......................................................................................................................... 31 The 11 Leadership Principals ...................................................................................................................... 41 Citizenship Defining Patriotism ..................................................................................................................................... 47 Rights, Responsibilities, and Privileges .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G
    MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G. Fast 8 Tactical Intelligence Shortcomings in Iraq: Restructuring Deputy Commanding General Battalion Intelligence to Win Brigadier General Brian A. Keller by Major Bill Benson and Captain Sean Nowlan Deputy Commandant for Futures Jerry V. Proctor Director of Training Development 16 Measuring Anti-U.S. Sentiment and Conducting Media and Support Analysis in The Republic of Korea (ROK) Colonel Eileen M. Ahearn by Major Daniel S. Burgess Deputy Director/Dean of Training Development and Support 24 Army’s MI School Faces TRADOC Accreditation Russell W. Watson, Ph.D. by John J. Craig Chief, Doctrine Division Stephen B. Leeder 25 USAIC&FH Observations, Insights, and Lessons Learned Managing Editor (OIL) Process Sterilla A. Smith by Dee K. Barnett, Command Sergeant Major (Retired) Editor Elizabeth A. McGovern 27 Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Intelligence Operations Design Director SSG Sharon K. Nieto by Michael A. Brake Associate Design Director and Administration 29 North Korean Special Operations Forces: 1996 Kangnung Specialist Angiene L. Myers Submarine Infiltration Cover Photographs: by Major Harry P. Dies, Jr. Courtesy of the U.S. Army Cover Design: 35 Deconstructing The Theory of 4th Generation Warfare Specialist Angiene L. Myers by Del Stewart, Chief Warrant Officer Three (Retired) Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelli- gence Center and Fort Huachuca (USAIC&FH) publishes the Military DEPARTMENTS Intelligence Professional Bulle- tin quarterly under provisions of AR 2 Always Out Front 58 Language Action 25-30. MIPB disseminates mate- rial designed to enhance individu- 3 CSM Forum 60 Professional Reader als’ knowledge of past, current, and emerging concepts, doctrine, materi- 4 Technical Perspective 62 MIPB 2004 Index al, training, and professional develop- ments in the MI Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Plums for Home and Commercial Production
    Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service HLA-6258 Sand Plums for Home and Commercial Production Beth McMahon Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets Research Assistant Oklahoma State University are also available on our website at: http://osufacts.okstate.edu Bruce Dunn Assistant Professor Geyer, 2010). Flowering will last for a couple of weeks and Oklahoma State University either red or yellow fruit will begin to form afterward. Ripening of the fruit occurs from June to early August and are either Sand plums, also known as Chickasaw plum, Cherokee yellow or a bright red. Both colors occur in the same areas plum, or Sandhill plum (Prunus angustifolia Marshall), are native of Oklahoma. Fruit size can range from ¼ inch to 1 inch. It fruit-producing shrubs or small trees in Oklahoma (Figure 1). is recommended that long sleeves be worn while collecting Use of sand plums range from cover for native bird species fruit since the plants may be thorny, depending upon how to making jams, jellies, and wine from the fruit. Commercial damaged they have been by deer and cattle in the past. desire in making jams and jellies has led to a rising interest in cultivating sand plums for home and orchard production. The purpose of this publication is to provide some basic knowledge Selecting Plants on how to identify, propagate, and grow your own sand plums. Besides selecting plants for fruit size and crop load, Sand plums range from 2 feet to 25 feet high, depend- you may also want to consider selecting plants that have ing upon soil and water conditions (Row and Geyer, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • 0704 GDP Thur Legals Classifieds 7/2/2013 3:15 PM Page C1
    0704_GDP_Thur Legals_Classifieds 7/2/2013 3:15 PM Page C1 W WW.G WIN NE TTD A ILY P O ST.CO M • T HURSDAY, JULY 4, 2013 • C1 CONSTRUCTION/ CONDEMNATIONS SERVICE BIDS erty is hereby notified that PRICE OF PLANS: the above property will be DBE: 7.00 forfeited as provided by law (O.C.G.A. Section 16-13-49) PLANS AND SPECIFICA- under the Georgia Controlled LEGAL NOTICES TIONS MAY BE INSPECTED Substances Act if a defense AT THE DISTRICT OFFICE is not filed within thirty (30) AS INDICATED. COPIES OF days from the service of the THE STANDARD SPECI- aforementioned civil action. 5IF%FTJHOBUFE-FHBM0SHBOGPS(XJOOFUU$PVOUZ (FPSHJB FICATIONS ($35.00) MAY 906-136957, 6/20,27,7/4 BE OBTAINED FROM THE .BJMMFHBMBEWFSUJTJOHUP STATE TRANSPORTATION IN THE LEGAL ADVERTISING DEADLINES THROUGH DECEMBER 2013 OFFICE ENGINEER AT ONE SUPERIOR COURT GEORGIA CENTER, 600 OF GWINNETT COUNTY Gwinnett Daily Post The deadline for legal advertising in the Thursday Legal Section (other than Foreclosures and Tax Sales) is 12 noon MONDAY. WEST PEACHTREE ST., NW, STATE OF GEORGIA IN ATLANTA, TELEPHONE CIVIL ACTION P. O. Box 603 Legal ads may also be submitted for publication on other days at your discretion, but you MUST specify the date you want the ad to be NUMBER (404) 631-1215. 13A-05070-3 Lawrenceville, GA 30046 published. The deadlines for publication are as follows: PLANS ARE AVAILABLE AS STATE OF GEORGIA, INDICATED. PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFF Attention: Legal Advertising t5VFTEBZOPPO5IVSTEBZEFBEMJOF t8FEOFTEBZOPPO'SJEBZEFBEMJOF t5IVSTEBZOPPO.POEBZEFBEMJOF THE CORRECT AMOUNT VS t'SJEBZOPPO5VFTEBZEFBEMJOF t4BUVSEBZOPPO8FEOFTEBZEFBEMJOF MUST BE MADE WITHIN 30 Ninety Eight Thousand DAYS OF BILLING; SUCH Seven Hundred Twenty Dol- Holidays may alter deadlines to earlier days.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Name Common Name
    Approved Approved & as a eligible to Not eligible to Approved as Frontage fulfill other fulfill other Type of plant a Street Tree Tree standards standards Heritage Tree Tree Heritage Species Botanical Name Common name Native Abelia x grandiflora Glossy Abelia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes White Forsytha; Korean Abeliophyllum distichum Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Abelialeaf Acanthropanax Fiveleaf Aralia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes sieboldianus Acer ginnala Amur Maple Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Aesculus parviflora Bottlebrush Buckeye Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Aesculus pavia Red Buckeye Shrub, Deciduous No No Yes Yes Alnus incana ssp. rugosa Speckled Alder Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Alnus serrulata Hazel Alder Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Amelanchier humilis Low Serviceberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Amelanchier stolonifera Running Serviceberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes False Indigo Bush; Amorpha fruticosa Desert False Indigo; Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No No Not eligible Bastard Indigo Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Aronia melanocarpa Black Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Aronia prunifolia Purple Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Groundsel-Bush; Eastern Baccharis halimifolia Shrub, Deciduous No No Yes Yes Baccharis Summer Cypress; Bassia scoparia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Burning-Bush Berberis canadensis American Barberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Common Barberry; Berberis vulgaris Shrub, Deciduous No No No No Not eligible European Barberry Betula pumila
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarship and Service 2012–2013
    SCHOLARSHIP AND SERVICE 2012 | 2013 CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY contents 6 Dr. Angela Butler: Trustees’ Scholar of the Year 8 Community engagement at CBU 12 Dr. Kyle Stewart: researching theoretical galaxy formation 14 Flagship programs send volunteers for global service 18 Dr. Daniel Skubik: legal issues of U.S. drone use 20 Compassion Ministries 22 Dr. Grace Ni: robotics 24 Engineering: enhancing humanity, benefitting community 26 Dr. Hyun-Woo Park & Dr. Dennis Bideshi: working to reduce threats by infected mosquitoes 28 Collinsworth School of Music challenges students to perform 30 Dr. Amy Stumpf: combining research and service 32 Dr. Jeff McNair: integrating people with disabilities 34 Dr. Trevor Gillum: understanding exercise at a cellular level 36 Kinesiology students study motor skill development with the elderly 2 38 Dr. Andy Herrity: entrepreneurship as service to the community SCHOLARSHIPS AND SERVICES | 2012-2013 Scholarship & Service California Baptist University 2012-2013 Editor: Dr. Mark A. Wyatt 3 Managing Editor: Dr. Kathie Chute Art Director: Edgar Garcia Photography: Tom Householder Contributing Writers: Kathie Chute, Grace Ferrel CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY RONALD L. ELLIS, PH.D. 4 SCHOLARSHIPS AND SERVICES | 2012-2013 welcome FRIENDS As an institution of higher learning, the icon included with Dr. Angela academically prepared, (2) biblically California Baptist University goes Butler’s story, and you’ll hear her play rooted, (3) globally minded and (4) beyond classrooms and campus some of the music she’s researching equipped to serve. Behind each of activities. Encouraging students to on the harpsichord. Dr. Grace Ni’s those student outcomes stands people “live your purpose” requires a deep video will demonstrate some of the who demonstrate those qualities commitment to excellence and to human characteristics in the robots she themselves.
    [Show full text]