Bird Protection in Western Samoa M.D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bird Protection in Western Samoa M.D Bird protection in Western Samoa M.D. Merlin arid J.O. Juvik In a study supported by the FFPS Oryx 100% observations of human-bird relationships collec- Fund, the authors investigated the impact of ted on a visit to Samoa during July-August 1980. traditional hunting practices on native land We carried out field-work on various parts of birds in Samoa. Hunting and habitat modifi- three islands: Savai'i, 'Upolu and Manono. We cation have contributed to the near extinction made surveys of both lowland and upland en- of several endemic species. Through new vironments, particularly in areas proposed for, or hunting regulations, conservation education already incorporated into, the newly-developed programmes and the development of a national parks' system. In addition, local people national park system, the Government of provided considerable information on bird- Western Samoa has moved to strengthen its hunting activities. commitment to the conservation of a unique insular biota. Geographical outline Centred approximately 14°S of the equator and Like most remote oceanic islands of the South 600 km east of Fiji, the 14 volcanic islands of the Pacific, the Samoan archipelago has relatively Samoan chain are spread out 450 km along a few animal species in comparison with adjacent north-west-south-east axis. Politically the archi- continental regions of similar size and environ- pelago is split into two groups: Western Samoa, mental diversity. Land birds compose the major an independent nation since 1962, composed of element in the native vertebrate fauna. Endem- Savi'i, 'Upolu and their small outliers; and ism is high, with 31 (84 per cent) of the 37 native American Samoa, a US territory, which includes species restricted to the Samoan archipelago Tutuila and the Manu'a Islands. (Muse and Muse, 1982). Western Samoa includes the two largest islands in Unfortunately, there is a lack of detailed data the archipelago; Savai'i (1820 sq km), with concerning the life histories and status of this mountains rising to 1858 m, and 'Upolu (1114 sq unique avifauna. This is particularly distressing km), with elevations to 1099 m. Together they because the continued existence of some of account for 93 per cent of the total land area of Samoa's endemic birds is threatened by commer- the chain and support the bulk of the native cial forestry and hunting. For example, the popu- avifauna. Savai'i has experienced recent volcanic lation size of manumea, the extraordinary tooth- activity and is thus characterised by extensive, billed pigeon Didunculus strigirostris, belonging gently sloping, lava plains, few perennial streams, to a genus endemic to Western Samoa, has been dispersed human settlement, and relatively large dramatically reduced because of '. hunting tracts of undisturbed tropical rain forest (Watling, pressures and habitat destruction' (Oilier et al., 1982). 'Upolu is older, with more erosional dis- 1979). section, better-developed soils, and surface water resources supporting higher human populations. This paper reviews the literature dealing with the Of the approximately 170,000 Western Samoan avifauna and presents the results of our Samoans, about 120,000 reside on 'Upolu, both Bird protection in Western Samoa 97 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 01 Oct 2021 at 09:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300019803 172 °w 170° W WESTERN SAMOA / Savai'i % SAMOA Government —•> -14°S Forestry / ^^,_y^v Upolu Scheme / j^-^__^->/ \ ! <^ Manu'a Islands P~JV Asau c*~"y V I ^ Tutuila 0 50 100 km X iv\-< Proposed Mt Silisili South Pacific Ocean X. jo^JJational Park \ ! ^"V >->^AMI Sii.s.lt (1859m) \ > 1 - Stevenson Memorial Reserve 2 Mt Vaea Scenic Reserve \ J 3- Vailima ^Salelologa Botanical Garden •~-^ Apolima #— Palolo Deep Marine a r ^& l Savai'i 1 *>J» Manono\ 2 ^F.to(1116m) J^^Xn. 10 W 0 20 km ^vWTogitogiga Recreation 'Upolu VOJr Reserve / ' O le Pupu Pu'e National Park Figure 1. National Park and Reserve areas in Western Samoa. in the urban areas around Apia (the capital) and livia, which became established during this in smaller coastal villages. The greater density of century. human settlement on 'Upolu has resulted in more substantial degradation of the native forests than on Savai'i. Bird hunting Several species, especially the native pigeons and Land birds doves, are hunted for food and sport. Indeed, the relatively large number of Samoan proverbs in- Among the 37 native land bird species and sub- volving bird hunting indicates that some species species in the Samoan archipelago, six are wide- have long served as a significant source of meat ranging and occur in other Pacific island areas. (Schultz, 1965). In addition, the recreational The remaining 31 are endemic to the Samoan exploitation of the avifauna is an ancient Samoan islands, with five forms restricted to the islands of pastime. The French navigator, Louis Antoine de American Samoa, a further 10 are found in both Bougainville, noted in 1772, in the earliest political jurisdictions and 16 species are restricted recorded reference to the birds of Samoa, that to 'Upolu and Savai'i in Western Samoa (Arm- people 'amuse themselves in their leisure hours strong, 1932; Ashmole, 1963; Dupont, 1976; by taming birds' and that their houses 'were full of Kennedy, 1974). Those endemics considered to wood-pigeons, and they bartered them by the be threatened because of hunting and habitat hundreds' (Armstrong, 1932). destruction in Western Samoa are listed in Table 1. In addition to the native avifauna, at least four Undoubtedly, exploitation of the Samoan avi- species of introduced land birds have established fauna began early in the prehistoric phase of breeding populations: moa'ai vao, the jungle fowl human occupation. This assumption is supported Gallus gallus, presumably introduced in the by archaeological evidence from a number of prehistoric period; the red-vented bulbul other Pacific islands, where the record of Poly- Pycnonotus cafer bengalensis; jungle mynah nesian extirpation of numerous flightless bird Acridotheres fuscus; and rock dove Columba species is well documented (the extinction of the 98 Oryx Vol 19 No 2 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 01 Oct 2021 at 09:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300019803 New Zealand Moa fauna being the most drama- tic). A recent analysis of fossil deposits found in the Hawaiian Islands suggests that 50 per cent or more of the native avifauna were extirpated prior to European contact and that much of this loss was the result of clearing lowland forests and hunting by early Polynesian settlers (Olson and James, 1982). Although comparable palaeonto- logical/archaeological finds have not yet been discovered in Samoa, it is probable that an early wave of avian extinctions followed Polynesian settlement some 3000 years ago. In the historic period a number of traditional methods of Samoan bird hunting have been well documented. Coconut-fibre snares were often used to trap sega vao, the blue-crowned lory Vini austrahs. The attractive blue and red feathers of this small indigenous bird were incorporated into ceremonial costumes and fine mats ('ie toga). Today these special costumes and mats are often decorated with dyed chicken feathers. Another ancient method involved the use of contained decoys to lure wild individuals into a cage trap. Now only manutagi, the crimson-crowned fruit dove Ptilinopus porphyraceus fasciatus is still captured in this way. According to Samoan legend describing a pigeon-snaring contest, a captured bird was tethered and used to lure flocks of pigeons within range of trapping nets. These nets were attached to long poles that were rapidly A young Samoan displays the fruits of his slingshot hunting at Asau Savai'i: a blue-crowned lory (left) and a cardinal honey- swept back and forth when the pigeons flew eater (right), both taken for food. down near the decoy (Herman, 1955). Nets were also supposedly used to catch the now presumed lata carunculata. Boys and young men stalk their extinct, flightless puna'e, or Samoan wood rail prey near the coast under large flowering trees Pareudiastes padficus. This species, belonging to (for example, Erythrina spp. and Sygyzium sp.) an endemic monotypic genus, was last seen for on which the birds come to feed. We observed certain on Savai'i in 1874 (Yaldwyn, 1952). this activity frequently near the village of Asau on Bows and arrows with one or more prongs were the north-west coast of Savai'i. We also saw, in used to catch ve'a, the banded rail Rallus other villages on Savai'i, young children holding philippensis goodsoni, a common ground- small birds whose feathers had been plucked. We feeding bird. In order to get close enough to the were told that lories and honeyeaters were secretive rails, some hunters would hide inside commonly eaten by the younger Samoans, but small huts and wait for the birds to come within birds are also sometimes kept as pets. Although range of their weapons (Schultz, 1955). widespread hunting with sling-shots may have some impact on the land birds, it certainly does not pose as significant a threat as does the con- Sling-shots are commonly used today to stun or temporary, widespread use of guns. kill small native land birds such as the blue- crowned lory; segasega mau'u or cardinal honeyeater Myzomela cardinalis nigriventris; andGovernment hunting regulations 'iao, the wattled honeyeater Foulehaio caruncu- By 1983 the impact of bird hunting, especially Bird protection in Western Samoa 99 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core.
Recommended publications
  • Management and Breeding of Birds of Paradise (Family Paradisaeidae) at the Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation
    Management and breeding of Birds of Paradise (family Paradisaeidae) at the Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. By Richard Switzer Bird Curator, Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. Presentation for Aviary Congress Singapore, November 2008 Introduction to Birds of Paradise in the Wild Taxonomy The family Paradisaeidae is in the order Passeriformes. In the past decade since the publication of Frith and Beehler (1998), the taxonomy of the family Paradisaeidae has been re-evaluated considerably. Frith and Beehler (1998) listed 42 species in 17 genera. However, the monotypic genus Macgregoria (MacGregor’s Bird of Paradise) has been re-classified in the family Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters). Similarly, 3 species in 2 genera (Cnemophilus and Loboparadisea) – formerly described as the “Wide-gaped Birds of Paradise” – have been re-classified as members of the family Melanocharitidae (Berrypeckers and Longbills) (Cracraft and Feinstein 2000). Additionally the two genera of Sicklebills (Epimachus and Drepanornis) are now considered to be combined as the one genus Epimachus. These changes reduce the total number of genera in the family Paradisaeidae to 13. However, despite the elimination of the 4 species mentioned above, 3 species have been newly described – Berlepsch's Parotia (P. berlepschi), Eastern or Helen’s Parotia (P. helenae) and the Eastern or Growling Riflebird (P. intercedens). The Berlepsch’s Parotia was once considered to be a subspecies of the Carola's Parotia. It was previously known only from four female specimens, discovered in 1985. It was rediscovered during a Conservation International expedition in 2005 and was photographed for the first time. The Eastern Parotia, also known as Helena's Parotia, is sometimes considered to be a subspecies of Lawes's Parotia, but differs in the male’s frontal crest and the female's dorsal plumage colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the Recovery of Two of Samoa's Most Threatened Bird
    LEADING THE RECOVERY OF TWO OF SAMOA’S MOST THREATENED BIRD SPECIES the tooth-billed pigeon (Manumea) and the mao (Ma’oma’o) through ecological research to identify current threats BIODI VERSITY CO NSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES 25 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES Leading the recovery of two of Samoa’s most threatened bird species, the tooth-billed pigeon (Manumea) and the mao (Ma’oma’o) 25 through ecological research to identify current threats Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series is published by: Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and Conservation International Pacific Islands and Oceans Program (CI-Pacific) PO Box 2035, Apia, Samoa T: + 685 21593 E: [email protected] W: www.conservation.org The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental goal is to ensure civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. Conservation International Pacific Islands and Oceans Program. 2013. Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series 25: Leading the recovery of two of Samoa’s most threatened bird species, the tooth-billed pigeon (Manumea) and the mao (Ma’oma’o) through ecological research to identify current threats. Conservation International, Apia, Samoa Authors: David Butler, Rebecca Stirnemann Design/Production: Joanne Aitken, The Little Design Company, www.thelittledesigncompany.com Cover Photograph: © Rebecca Stirnemann Series Editor: Leilani Duffy, Conservation International Pacific Islands and Oceans Program Conservation International is a private, non-profit organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Pacific Islands: Samoa, Fiji, Vanuatu & New Caledonia Trip Report 11Th to 31St July 2015
    Southwest Pacific Islands: Samoa, Fiji, Vanuatu & New Caledonia Trip Report 11th to 31st July 2015 Orange Fruit Dove by K. David Bishop Trip Report - RBT Southwest Pacific Islands 2015 2 Tour Leaders: K. David Bishop and David Hoddinott Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader: K. David Bishop Tour Summary Rockjumper’s inaugural tour of the islands of the Southwest Pacific kicked off in style with dinner at the Stamford Airport Hotel in Sydney, Australia. The following morning we were soon winging our way north and eastwards to the ancient Gondwanaland of New Caledonia. Upon arrival we then drove south along a road more reminiscent of Europe, passing through lush farmlands seemingly devoid of indigenous birds. Happily this was soon rectified; after settling into our Noumea hotel and a delicious luncheon, we set off to explore a small nature reserve established around an important patch of scrub and mangroves. Here we quickly cottoned on to our first endemic, the rather underwhelming Grey-eared Honeyeater, together with Nankeen Night Herons, a migrant Sacred Kingfisher, White-bellied Woodswallow, Fantailed Gerygone and the resident form of Rufous Whistler. As we were to discover throughout this tour, in areas of less than pristine habitat we encountered several Grey-eared Honeyeater by David Hoddinott introduced species including Common Waxbill. And so began a series of early starts which were to typify this tour, though today everyone was up with added alacrity as we were heading to the globally important Rivierre Bleu Reserve and the haunt of the incomparable Kagu. We drove 1.3 hours to the reserve, passing through a stark landscape before arriving at the appointed time to meet my friend Jean-Marc, the reserve’s ornithologist and senior ranger.
    [Show full text]
  • New Caledonia, Fiji & Vanuatu
    Field Guides Tour Report Part I: New Caledonia Sep 5, 2011 to Sep 15, 2011 Phil Gregory The revamped tour was a little later this year and it seemed to make some things a bit easier, note how well we did with the rare Crow Honeyeater, and Kagu was as ever a standout. One first-year bird was rewarded with a nice juicy scorpion that our guide found, and this really is a fabulous bird to see, another down on Harlan's famiy quest, too, as an added bonus to what is a quite unique bird. Cloven-feathered Dove was also truly memorable, and watching one give that strange, constipated hooting call was fantastic and this really is one of the world's best pigeons. Air Calin did their best to make life hard with a somewhat late flight to Lifou, and I have to say the contrast with the Aussie pilots in Vanuatu was remarkable -- these French guys must still be learning as they landed the ATR 42's so hard and had to brake so fiercely! Still, it all worked out and the day trip for the Ouvea Parakeet worked nicely, whilst the 2 endemic white-eyes on Lifou were got really early for once. Nice food, an interesting Kanak culture, with a trip to the amazing Renzo Piano-designed Tjibaou Cultural Center also feasible this The fantastic Kagu, star of the tour! (Photo by guide Phil year, and a relaxed pace make this a fun birding tour with some Gregory) terrific endemic birds as a bonus. My thanks to Karen at the Field Guides office for hard work on the complex logistics for this South Pacific tour, to the very helpful Armstrong at Arc en Ciel, Jean-Marc at Riviere Bleue, and to Harlan and Bart for helping me with my bags when I had a back problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Ma'oma'o Or
    RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE MA’OMA’O OR MAO (Gymnomyza samoensis) SAMOA’S LARGE FOREST HONEYEATER 2006-2016 Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment (MNRE) Government of Samoa October 2006 i Introduction to Recovery Planning Recovery planning has been adopted internationally as a way of developing an agreed approach for the conservation of a threatened species. It provides an opportunity for all with knowledge of, or an interest in, a given species to contribute their ideas and agree on priority actions within a recovery plan. A recovery plan provides confidence for funding agencies, and others interested in contributing time or expertise to aid a species, that all available information has been reviewed, all options for recovery considered and the best approach identified. Recovery Plans can also be used to raise public awareness about a species. This plan will guide the Division of Environment and Conservation (DEC), of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, the agency with responsibility for the conservation of Samoa’s biodiversity, in its work. It also provides an opportunity for any other agency with an interest in bird conservation to identify what is needed to conserve the Ma’oma’o and work out how it can assist. A small group drafted this plan over a 2-month period towards the end of an RNHP- funded project that also included nationwide surveys for the Ma’oma’o. A draft was presented at two national workshops (Annex 2), on Upolu on 29 September and Savaii on 3 October where support for its implementation was widely expressed. It was formally approved on ? [add date] by ? [add who approved] A threatened bird recovery group is proposed to review the progress of this plan, another recently completed on the Manumea or Tooth-billed Pigeon (Didunculus strigirostris), and any future ones to be developed in Samoa.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Those Ar- Dana L Moseley Ticles Using Packages Tm and Topicmodels in R to Ex- Graham E Derryberry Tract Common Words and Trends
    ABSTRACT BOOK Listed alphabetically by last name of presenting author Oral Presentations . 2 Lightning Talks . 161 Posters . 166 AOS 2018 Meeting 9-14 April 2018 ORAL PRESENTATIONS Combining citizen science with targeted monitoring we argue how the framework allows for effective large- for Gulf of Mexico tidal marsh birds scale inference and integration of multiple monitoring efforts. Scientists and decision-makers are interested Evan M Adams in a range of outcomes at the regional scale, includ- Mark S Woodrey ing estimates of population size and population trend Scott A Rush to answering questions about how management actions Robert J Cooper or ecological questions influence bird populations. The SDM framework supports these inferences in several In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill affected many ways by: (1) monitoring projects with synergistic ac- marsh birds in the Gulf of Mexico; yet, a lack of prior tivities ranging from using approved standardized pro- monitoring data made assessing impacts to these the tocols, flexible data sharing policies, and leveraging population impacts difficult. As a result, the Gulf of multiple project partners; (2) rigorous data collection Mexico Avian Monitoring Network (GoMAMN) was that make it possible to integrate multiple monitoring established, with one of its objectives being to max- projects; and (3) monitoring efforts that cover multiple imize the value of avian monitoring projects across priorities such that projects designed for status assess- the region. However, large scale assessments of these ment can also be useful for learning or describing re- species are often limited, tidal marsh habitat in this re- sponses to management activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Mao's Bestiary
    Mao’s Bestiary Medicinal Animals and Modern China / Liz P. Y. Chee Mao’s Bestiary Mao’s experimental futures Technological lives, scienTific arTs, anThropological voices A series edited by Michael M. J. Fischer and Joseph Dumit Bestiary Medicinal Animals and Modern China / Liz P. Y. Chee duke universiTy press ​durham and london ​2021 © 2021 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer i ca on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Aimee C. Harrison Typeset in Portrait Text by Westchester Publishing Ser vices Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Chee, Liz P. Y., [date] author. Title: Mao’s bestiary : medicinal animals and modern China / Liz P. Y. Chee. Other titles: Experimental futures. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2021. | Series: Experi- mental futures | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2020031117 (print) lccn 2020031118 (ebook) isbn 9781478011903 (hardcover) isbn 9781478014041 (paperback) isbn 9781478021353 (ebook) Subjects: lcsh: Materia medica, Animal— China. | Pharmacognosy— China. | Animals— Therapeutic use— China. | Traditional medicine. Classification: lcc rs162 .c445 2021 (print) | lcc rs162 (ebook) | ddc 615.3/60951— dc23 lc rec ord available at https:// lccn . loc . gov / 2020031117 lc ebook rec ord available at https:// lccn . loc . gov / 2020031118 To my “ uncle” and cat contents Acknowl edgments / ix Introduction / 1 1 “Abandon Chinese Medicine, Retain Chinese Drugs” Creating a State Phar ma ceu ti cal Sector ​/ 27 2 “To Learn
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Throated Lorikeet in Fiji
    Building community support to search for the RED-THROATED LORIKEET IN FIJI BIODI VERSITY CO NSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES 24 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES Building community support to search for the 24 Red-throated Lorikeet in Fiji Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series is published by: Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and Conservation International Pacific Islands Program (CI-Pacific) PO Box 2035, Apia, Samoa T: + 685 21593 E: [email protected] W: www.conservation.org The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental goal is to ensure civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. Conservation International Pacific Islands Program. 2013. Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series 24: Building community support to search for the Red-throated Lorikeet in Fiji Conservation International, Apia, Samoa Author: Dick Watling, Fiji Nature Conservation Trust, [email protected] Design/Production: Joanne Aitken, The Little Design Company, www.thelittledesigncompany.com Cover Image: Trichoglossus aureocinctus; Charmosyna aureicincta. Artist: John Gerrard Keulemans (1842–1912). Source: Ornithological Miscellany. Volume 1, via WIkimedia Commons. Series Editor: Leilani Duffy, Conservation International Pacific Islands Program Conservation International is a private, non-profit organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. OUR MISSION Building upon a strong foundation of science, partnership and field demonstration, Conservation International empowers societies to responsibly and sustainably care for nature for the well-being of humanity. ISBN 978-982-9130-24-2 © 2013 Conservation International All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from on 27/06/2017
    RIS for Site no. 2313, O Le Pupū Puē National Park, Samoa Ramsar Information Sheet Published on 6 October 2017 Samoa O Le Pupū Puē National Park Designation date 2 February 2016 Site number 2313 Coordinates 13°59'S 171°43'53"W Area 5 019,00 ha https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2313 Created by RSIS V.1.6 on - 18 May 2020 RIS for Site no. 2313, O Le Pupū Puē National Park, Samoa Color codes Fields back-shaded in light blue relate to data and information required only for RIS updates. Note that some fields concerning aspects of Part 3, the Ecological Character Description of the RIS (tinted in purple), are not expected to be completed as part of a standard RIS, but are included for completeness so as to provide the requested consistency between the RIS and the format of a ‘full’ Ecological Character Description, as adopted in Resolution X.15 (2008). If a Contracting Party does have information available that is relevant to these fields (for example from a national format Ecological Character Description) it may, if it wishes to, include information in these additional fields. 1 - Summary Summary O Le Pupū Puē National Park (OLPP) was established in 1978 as the first ever National Park in Samoa and the South Pacific region. It is located on the southern part of Upolu Island and extends from the highest points on the island (Mt. Vaivai, 1158 m), Mt. Fito (1120 m) and Mt. Puē (1020 m) down to the rugged Le Pupū lava coastal cliffs. The Site therefore has the full range of ecosystems from the littoral forests on the rugged coastal ridges, to the lowland rainforest, extending to the ridge rainforests along the watershed area to the montane forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List 53 Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States As Threatened Or Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST 53 AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE UNITED STATES AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY JULY 11, 2012 1 Notice of Petition _____________________________________________________________________________ Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Gary Frazer, Assistant Director for Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Nicole Alt, Chief Division of Conservation and Classification, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] AUTHORS Collette L. Adkins Giese Herpetofauna Staff Attorney Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 339 Circle Pines, MN 55014-0339 [email protected] 2 D. Noah Greenwald Endangered Species Program Director Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211-0374 [email protected] Tierra Curry Conservation Biologist P.O. Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211-0374 [email protected] PETITIONERS The Center for Biological Diversity. The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non- profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center is supported by over 375,000 members and on-line activists throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History Guide to American Samoa
    NATURAL HISTORY GUIDE TO AMERICAN SAMOA rd 3 Edition NATURAL HISTORY GUIDE This Guide may be available at: www.nps.gov/npsa Support was provided by: National Park of American Samoa Department of Marine & Wildlife Resources American Samoa Community College Sport Fish & Wildlife Restoration Acts American Samoa Department of Commerce Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawaii American Samoa Coral Reef Advisory Group National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Natural History is the study of all living things and their environment. Cover: Ofu Island (with Olosega in foreground). NATURAL HISTORY GUIDE NATURAL HISTORY GUIDE TO AMERICAN SAMOA 3rd Edition P. Craig Editor 2009 National Park of American Samoa Department Marine and Wildlife Resources Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 Box 3730, Pago Pago, American Samoa American Samoa Community College Community and Natural Resources Division Box 5319, Pago Pago, American Samoa NATURAL HISTORY GUIDE Preface & Acknowledgments This booklet is the collected writings of 30 authors whose first-hand knowledge of American Samoan resources is a distinguishing feature of the articles. Their contributions are greatly appreciated. Tavita Togia deserves special recognition as contributing photographer. He generously provided over 50 exceptional photos. Dick Watling granted permission to reproduce the excellent illustrations from his books “Birds of Fiji, Tonga and Samoa” and “Birds of Fiji and Western Polynesia” (Pacificbirds.com). NOAA websites were a source of remarkable imagery. Other individuals, organizations, and publishers kindly allowed their illustrations to be reprinted in this volume; their credits are listed in Appendix 3. Matt Le'i (Program Director, OCIA, DOE), Joshua Seamon (DMWR), Taito Faleselau Tuilagi (NPS), Larry Basch (NPS), Tavita Togia (NPS), Rise Hart (RCUH) and many others provided assistance or suggestions throughout the text.
    [Show full text]
  • SERDP Project ER18-1653
    FINAL REPORT Approach for Assessing PFAS Risk to Threatened and Endangered Species SERDP Project ER18-1653 MARCH 2020 Craig Divine, Ph.D. Jean Zodrow, Ph.D. Meredith Frenchmeyer Katie Dally Erin Osborn, Ph.D. Paul Anderson, Ph.D. Arcadis US Inc. Distribution Statement A Page Intentionally Left Blank This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. Page Intentionally Left Blank Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
    [Show full text]