1 Chapter I Introduction, Review of Literature And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Chapter I Introduction, Review of Literature And CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND CONCEPTS Agriculture in India has always been a way of life, rather than a business and has suffered from stagnation due to low productivity arising from inadequate investment. Low investment is caused by low farm income, which follows in turns from low resource productivity completing the vicious circle. To break-through this problem and to bring an upward movement is by the way of increasing capital investment. An initial push which has been characterized as “Big Push” by “Rodden stein-Rodan” “Critical Minimum effort by Leibenstein, Bottleneck breaking” by Ragnar Nurkse, Linkage effects by Hirschman all are conveying that a need for giving greater attention to capital investment. In 1951 census 82.7 percent of the population of the country lived in rural areas it has declined to 72.2 percent in 2001 census. The share of the rural population in the total population was declining at the rate of hardly two percent per decade. Dependence on agriculture for livelihood in the rural areas is 73.3 percent during 2001 census (Vyas V.S. 2007). Agriculture contributes almost 28 percent of India‟s GDP per year. In the era of planned economic growth of India with GDP growth rate of 8 percent per year, more than 32 percent of population is living below the poverty line. The rate of growth of employment in agriculture sector has declined from 2.57 percent in 1987-88 to 1993-94 to 0.02 percent in 1993-94 to 1999-00. The emergence of green revolution in India by the late sixties has changed the character of Indian agriculture. There was a growing tendency among the farmers to replace the traditional farming practices with scientific and modern practices, which is reflected by the use of HYV seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, irrigation, machinery and equipment etc. These inputs require heavy financial investments, which the majority of the farmers cannot afford from their own savings. Because they are suffer from indebtedness. According to NSSO indebtedness is highest in Andhra Pradesh (82 percent) followed by Tamil Nadu (74.5 percent) Punjab (65.4 percent) Kerala (64.4 percent) Karnataka (61.6 percent) and Maharashtra (54.8 percent). So the farmers therefore have to depend to a large extent on borrowed funds. This has naturally increased the demand for credit of a large number of farmers. 1 Statement of the Problem Indian agriculture is in a state of serious crisis” and the rate of growth in food production had fallen below the population growth rate. “Over 400 million children, women and men belonging to families with small and marginal holdings and landless labour families are in deep distress”. The investment in agriculture has stagnated at 13 percent of the Gross National Product in the last three five-year plans” (Swaminathan M.S. 2005). The annual average farm growth rate has declined from 4.9 percent in the eighth plan to 1.3 percent in the 10th plan. The share of agriculture investment in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined from 1.99 percent in the eighth plan to 1.66 percent in the 10th plan. In spite of the low interest the poor borrowers do not rely on banks or in spite of charging higher interest the moneylenders are still dominating the rural credit market, why? To answer these questions, economist like George Stieglitz (1995) developed a theory of asymmetry of information in which he argued that the formal credit still remain unreachable and replace the role of informal credit markets in rural areas due to the lack of information or imperfect information about the individual borrowers in the rural areas particularly the poor. The village money lender by virtue of small area of operation, are able to gather full or perfect information about the individual borrowers particularly the poor borrowers including the honesty of the person, his background, his heirs, his capacity to repay, in this absence the borrow who will be bearing the repayment etc. It is equally risky that the money lenders lend even to strangers without any collateral security and in the event of default he may lose the money. Informal credit accounts for all these and charges a higher interest. This is highly impossible for the formal bank to have all these information and even if it is produced in the application form, it is highly doubt full and difficult to cross check whether the borrower is giving the real and true information, or the lack of knowledge about the poor small borrowers, which make the banks remain unreachable the poor borrowers. Another important problem is financial institutions the delivery of credit to agriculture is neither smooth nor adequate (Veerashekarappa, 1994). There exists a substantial gap between the demand for and supply of agricultural credit (Kaliyaperumal and Loganathan, 1989). The same idea has been reviewed by Benson Kunjukunju and Mohanan and they also found out region-wise, institution sector-wise and scheme-wise credit gap. There is also a wide gap between the application of loan and sanction of loan (Benson Kunjukunju and Mohanan, 2003). So, the farmers borrow money from the informal 2 sources. In the less developed regions, the small farmers highly depend on informal sources (Dandekar and Wadia, 1989). The same view has been expressed by Kaliyaperumal and Loganathan (1989), but Ramachandran Pillai (2003) has stated that not only small farmers, marginal farmers also depend on such traditional sources of funds because they do not have the collateral to obtain institutional loans and timely credit is not available to the farmers. Veerashekarappa, 1996 also stated that timely credit often needs political intervention. Another problem is distribution of formal sector credit is also unequal with regard to region, class, caste and gender (Ramachandran and Madhura Swaminathan, 2002). And uneven distribution of credit existed not only between states, but also between different economic sectors and noted that bank credit was virtually non-available to small borrowers and weaker sections (Rais Ahmad, 1998). Credit institutions are unequally distributed across the region and accessibility to timely credit depends often on political intervention (Veerashekharappa, 1996). Inequalities exist in the spread of credit, across the regions (Nair, 1999) and across landholding (Gadgil, 1986). The inequalities in the banking system across the regions and social classes persisted (Bell, 1990). This was because of the insistence on collateral (Sarap, 1991) which could not be provided by the poor, complicated administration procedures, long distances from the villages to the branches, the cultural gap between bank officials and the poor, political interference, inflexible lending policies and procedures, lack of provision for consumption credit and a widespread belief that the poor were non-bankable. Veerashekerappa, (1994) expressed his views regarding inequality in the distribution of institutional agricultural credit across the districts in Karnataka. He explained that the uneven distribution of credit supply is caused to some extent by operation and attitudinal deficiencies, but the districts which are characterized by relatively high levels of agricultural development, infrastructure development, rural literacy rate, irrigated area, cropping intensity, use of HYV and fertilizer consumption are in a better position in pulling the credit to the regions. Inequalities of credit also exist in the category of farmers. The marginal propensity to save of the progressive farmers is higher than that of less progressive farmers. Ramachandran Pillai, (2003) has observed that assets such as land, agricultural implements, vehicles and transport equipments and pump sets, tube wells, and other machinery are concentrated in the hands of landlords and rich peasants. So, they easily get institutional credit. This skewed distribution of assets has enabled the rich to garner the benefits of 3 productivity and production increases in the rural economy. Bank wise also credit is unequally distributed. The credit disbursements of commercial banks have been higher in southern region (52 percent) of India. Whereas, the co-operative banks have dominated in southern and western regions (56 percent). But the institutional credit flows to northeastern and eastern region are rather insignificant. It shows the regional imbalances in the credit flow by institutional sources (Agrawal K.P. et al., 1997). Another major problem faced by all these three agencies is the delinquency of loans. While the problem faced by all these three agencies is the delinquency of loans. While the problem became serious among co-operatives by 1970 itself, the commercial banks got into the problem only after 1975-76 because of their late entry into rural credit. Regional rural banks are having higher overdue compared to other agencies (Subramanyam, 2004). According to Bhat both from financial institutions and farmers point of view, overdue is high in commercial banks when compared to other banks. It is due to Government policy, ineffective legislation, indiscriminate financing, inadequacies in proper monitoring, co-ordination and follow up, inadequacies in training and co-ordination, natural calamities, political compulsion (Rao, 2004). Even though many financial institutions are started, their main objectives are to free the agriculturists from the clutches of moneylenders and non-institutional agencies. Because some study also shows that farmers have committed suicides due to non-repayment of borrowed amounts from the moneylenders. Hence aim is to reduce the problem of moneylenders. Because suicides of farmers in Andhra Pradesh (Parthasarathy, 1998) and northern districts of Karnataka (Muzaffar Assadi, 1998). Under these circumstances, it is essential to find out whether the financial institutions are able to meet all the credit requirements of farmers. What is the proportion of credit disposed by the commercial banks, Co-operative banks and other financial institutions? The financial institutions though provide short-term, medium term and long-term agricultural credit; there is no clear picture with regard to the assessment of the performance of this credit.
Recommended publications
  • Farmer Database
    KVK, Trichy - Farmer Database Animal Biofertilier/v Gende Commun Value Mushroo Other S.No Name Fathers name Village Block District Age Contact No Area C1 C2 C3 Husbandry / Honey bee Fish/IFS ermi/organic Others r ity addition m Enterprise IFS farming 1 Subbaiyah Samigounden Kolakudi Thottiyam TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 57 9787932248 BC 2 Manivannan Ekambaram Salaimedu, Kurichi Kulithalai Karur M 58 9787935454 BC 4 Ixora coconut CLUSTERB 3 Duraisamy Venkatasamy Kolakudi Thottiam TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 42 9787936175 BC Vegetable groundnut cotton EAN 4 Vairamoorthy Aynan Kurichi Kulithalai Karur M 33 9787936969 bc jasmine ixora 5 subramanian natesan Sirupathur MANACHANALLUR TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 42 9787942777 BC Millet 6 Subramaniyan Thirupatur MANACHANALLUR TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 42 9787943055 BC Tapioca 7 Saravanadevi Murugan Keelakalkandarkottai THIRUVERAMBUR TIRUCHIRAPPALLI F 42 9787948480 SC 8 Natarajan Perumal Kattukottagai UPPILIYAPURAM TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 47 9787960188 BC Coleus 9 Jayanthi Kalimuthu top senkattupatti UPPILIYAPURAM Tiruchirappalli F 41 9787960472 ST 10 Selvam Arunachalam P.K.Agaram Pullampady TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 23 9787964012 MBC Onion 11 Dharmarajan Chellappan Peramangalam LALGUDI TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 68 9787969108 BC sugarcane 12 Sabayarani Lusis prakash Chinthamani Musiri Tiruchirappalli F 49 9788043676 BC Alagiyamanavala 13 Venkataraman alankudimahajanam LALGUDI TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 67 9788046811 BC sugarcane n 14 Vijayababu andhanallur andhanallur TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 30 9788055993 BC 15 Palanivel Thuvakudi THIRUVERAMBUR TIRUCHIRAPPALLI M 65 9788056444
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Panchayats and Different Villages Adopted by Holy Cross College
    List of the Panchayats and different villages adopted by Holy Cross College HOLY CROSS COLLEGE (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli-2 RESCAPES PANCHAYAT NAME VILLAGE NAME 1. AZHAGIYAMANVALAM 2. GOPURAPATTY 1. AZHAGIYAMANVALAM 3. PALAIYUR 4. THIRUVARANGAPATTY 5. KOVATHAKUDI 2. KOVATHAKUDI 6. PAACHUR 7. SALAPATTY-NORTH 3. SIRUPATHUR 8. VEERANI 4. THIRUVASI 9. THIRUVASI 10. THATHAMANGALAM 5. THATHAMANGALAM 11. DEVIMANGALAM 12. NO.94 KARIYAMANIKAM 6. NO.94 KARIYAMANIKAM 13. KANNIYAKUDI 14. C.AYAMPALAYAM 7. C.AYAMPALAYAM 15. SALAKADU-SOUTH 16. THIRUPANJALEE 8. THIRUPANJALEE 17. VALMANAPALAYAM-MELUR 18. VALMANAPALAYAM-KELUR 19. SENGUDI 9. NO-2 KARIYAMANIKAM 20. SENNAKARAI 21. KURUVAMPATTY 10. THALUTHALAPATTY 22. THALUTHALAPATTY 11. AYIKUDI 23. AYIKUDI 12. VALAIYUR 24. VALAIYUR Map of the adopted Panchayats at Manachanallur Block at Tiruchirappalli in Tamil Nadu, India HOLY CROSS COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS), Tiruchirappalli- 620 002 Part VI - SERVICE ORIENTED COURSES Staff in Charge List Extension Activities Staff In charge Shift I Shift II AICUF Dr. Pricila, R. Ms. Mercy Jennifer.M.D Come Alive Program Dr. Crescenta Shakila Motha.L Ms. V.Jayarani Consumer Club Dr. Josephine Lourdu De Rose R.Aishwarya Financial Literacy Club Ms.Mary Suthanthiramalar, M. Ms. N. Jayalakshmi Ms. Arockia Punitha.S EXNORA Dr. Janova Mary Ms. Vidhya.N NCC Ms. Arockia Saibe.P NSS Dr. Shanthi, P. Ms. Nobel Ester Ms. A. RoselineMary Red Ribbon Club Ms. Suregka Felix, K. Ms. Jeba Synthia. D.M Rotaract Dr. Morris Princy Ms. Angel Metilda. G Dr. Antonitte Vinolini.L Gender champion club Ms. Saraswathi, R. Ms. Deerkalakshmi Ms. Mary Elizabeth Shayamala Ms. Irudaya Monica Catherine .J Youth Red Cross Dr. Suganthi, K. Ms. Tony Elizabeth.A Leo club Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichirapalli.Pdf
    Contents TITLE Page No. Message by Member Secretary, State Planning Commission i Preface by the District Collector iii Acknowledgement v List of Boxes vii List of Figures viii List of Tables ix Chapters 1. DistrictProfile 1 2. Status of Human Development 11 3. Employment, Income and Poverty 29 4. Demography, Health and Nutrition 45 5. Literacy and Education 75 6. Gender 105 7. Social Security 113 8. Infrastructure 123 9. Summary and Way Forward 133 Annexures Technical Notes A20 Abbreviations A27 References A29 TIRUCHIRAPPALI DISTRICT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2017 District Administration, Tiruchirappali and State Planning Commission, Tamil Nadu in association with Bharathidasan University Contents TITLE Page No. Message by Member Secretary, State Planning Commission i Preface by the District Collector iii Acknowledgement v List of Boxes vii List of Figures viii List of Tables ix Chapters 1. DistrictProfile 1 2. Status of Human Development 11 3. Employment, Income and Poverty 29 4. Demography, Health and Nutrition 45 5. Literacy and Education 75 6. Gender 105 7. Social Security 113 8. Infrastructure 123 9. Summary and Way Forward 133 Annexures Technical Notes A20 Abbreviations A27 References A29 Dr. K.S.Palanisamy,I.A.S., Office : 0431-2415358 District Collector, Fax : 0431-2411929 Tiruchirappalli. Res : 0431-2420681 0431-2420181 Preface India has the potential to achieve and the means to secure a reasonable standard of living for all the sections of its population. Though the economy touched the nine per cent growth rate during the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-12), there are socio-economically disadvantaged people who are yet to benefit from this growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Thiruchirappal Disaster Managem Iruchirappalli
    Tiruchirappalli District Disaster Management Plan – 2020 THIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN-2020 Tiruchirappalli District Disaster Management Plan – 2020 INDEX S. Particulars Page No. No. 1. Introduction 1 2. District Profile 2-4 3. Disaster Management Goals (2017-2030) 5-11 4. Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Analysis with Maps 12-49 (District map, Division maps, Taluk maps & list of Vulnerable area) 5. Institutional Mechanism 50-52 6. Preparedness Measures 53-56 7. Prevention and Mitigation measures (2015 – 2030) 57-58 8. Response Plan 59 9. Recovery and Reconstruction Plan 60-61 10. Mainstreaming Disaster Management in Development Plans 62-63 11. Community and other Stake holder participation 64-65 12. Linkages / Co-ordination with other agencies for Disaster Management 66 13. Budget and Other Financial allocation – Outlays of major schemes 67 14. Monitoring and Evaluation 68 15. Risk Communication Strategies 69-70 16. Important Contact Numbers and provision for link to detailed information 71-108 (All Line Department, BDO, EO, VAO’s) 17. Dos and Don’ts during all possible Hazards 109-115 18. Important Government Orders 116-117 19. Linkages with Indian Disaster Resource Network 118 20 Vulnerable Groups details 118 21. Mock Drill Schedules 119 22. Date of approval of DDMP by DDMA 120 23. Annexure 1 – 14 120-148 Tiruchirappalli District Disaster Management Plan – 2020 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS S. Abbreviation Explanation No. 1. AO Agriculture Officer 2 AF Armed Forces 3 BDO Block Development Officers 4 DDMA District Disaster Management Authority 5 DDMP District Disaster Management Plan 6 DEOC District Emergency Operations Center 7 DRR Disaster Risk Reduction 8 DERAC District Emergency Relief Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Book TRICHIRAPALLI.Pmd
    THIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISTRICT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT TRICHIRAPALLI DISTRICT Introduction The district of Tiruchirappalli was formerly called by the British as ‘Trichinopoly’ and is commonly known as ‘Tiruchirappalli’ in Tamil or Tiruchirappalli‘ in English. The district in its present size was formed in September 1995 by trifurcating the composite Tiruchirappalli district into Tiruchirappalli, Karur and Perambalur districts. The district is basically agrarian; the industrial growth has been supported by the public sector companies like BHEL, HAPP, OFT and Railway workshop. The district is pioneer in fabrication industry and the front runner in the fabrication of windmill towers in the country. As two rivers flow through the district, the Northern part of the district is filled with greeneries than other areas of the district. The river Cauvery irrigates about 51,000 ha. in Tiruchirappalli, Lalgudi and Musiri Divisions. Multifarious crops are grown in this district and Agriculture is the main occupation for most of the people in the District. With an area of 36,246 hectares under the coverage of the forests the district accounts for 1.65 percentage of the total forest area of 1 the State. Honey and Cashewnuts are the main forest produces besides fuel wood. The rivers Kaveri (also called Cauvery) and the river Coleroon (also called Kollidam) flow through the district. There are a few reserve forests along the river Cauvery, located at the west and the north-west of the city. Tiruchirappalli district has been divided into three revenue divisions, viz., Tiruchirappalli, Musiri and Lalgudi. It is further classified into 14 blocks, viz., Andanallur, Lalgudi, Mannachanallur, Manigandam, Manapparai, Marungapuri, Musiri, Pullambadi, Thiruvarumbur, Thottiyam, Thuraiyur, T.Pet, Uppiliyapuram, and Vaiyampatti.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiruchirappalli Underground Sewerage System
    Initial Environmental Examination Document Stage: Draft Project Number: 49107-004 May 2018 IND: Tamil Nadu Urban Flagship Investment Program – Tiruchirappalli Underground Sewerage System Prepared by Tiruchirappalli City Corporation of Government of Tamil Nadu for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 11 May 2018) Currency Unit – Indian rupee (₹) ₹1.00 – $0.015 $1.00 = ₹67.09 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ASI – Archaeological Survey of India CMSC – construction management and supervision consultant CPCB – Central Pollution Control Board CTE – consent to establish CTO – consent to operate EAC – expert appraisal committee EHS – environmental, health and safety EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan ESS – environmental and social safeguards ESZ – eco sensitive zone GRC – grievance redress committee GRM – grievance redress mechanism GOTN – Government of Tamil Nadu IEE – initial environmental examination MOEFCC – Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change NOC – no objection certificate PIU – project implementation unit PMU – project management unit ROW – right-of-way SIDCO – Small Industries Development Corporation SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement STP – sewage treatment plant TCC – Tiruchirappalli City Corporation TNPCB – Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board TNUFIP – Tamil Nadu Urban Flagship Investment Program TNUIFSL – Tamil Nadu Urban Infrastructure Financial Services Limited TWADB – Tamil Nadu Water and Drainage Board ULB – urban local body WHO – World Health Organization WTP – water treatment plant WEIGHTS AND MEASURES C degree Celsius km kilometer lpcd litre per capita per day m meter ml milliliter Mld million liters per day mm millimeter km2 square kilometer NOTE In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Dos-Fsos -District Wise List
    THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE DISTRICT WISE LIST OF FSOs WITH WORKING AREA, AREA CODE No. AND CONTACT NUMBER AS ON 05.09.2012 Area Sl. NO.OF Ward No./Div.no. Contact District Sl.No. Name Working area code No. FSOs (more than 1 FSO working area) Number No. 1 ARIYALUR 7 1 Nainar Mohamed.M Andimadam block 001 9788682404 2 Rathinam.V Ariyalur block 002 9865463269 3 Sivakumar.P Jayankondam block 003 9787224473 4 Nainar Mohamed.M Sendurai block i/c 004 9788682404 5 Savadamuthu.S T.Palur block 005 8681920807 6 Stalin Prabu.L Thirumanur block 006 9842387798 7 Sivakumar.P Jayankondam Mpty i/c 401 9787224473 2 CHENNAI 25 1 Sivasankaran.A Chennai Corpn. 1-6&10 527 9894728409 2 Elangovan.A Chennai Corpn. 7-9,11-13 528 9952925641 3 Jayagopal.N.H Chennai Corpn. 14-21 529 9841453114 4 Sundarraj.P Chennai Corpn. 22-28 &31 530 8056198866 5 JebharajShobanaKumar.K Chennai Corpn. 29,30 531 9840867617 6 Chandrasekaran.A Chennai Corpn. 32-40 532 9283372045 7 Muthukrishnan.M Chennai Corpn. 41-49 533 9942495309 8 Kasthuri.K Chennai Corpn. 50-56 534 9865390140 9 Mariappan.M Chennai Corpn. 57-63 535 9444231720 10 Sathasivam.A Chennai Corpn. 64,66-68 &71 536 9444909695 11 Manimaran.P Chennai Corpn. 65,69,70,72,73 537 9884048353 12 Saranya.A.S Chennai Corpn. 74-78 538 9944422060 13 Sakthi Murugan.K Chennai Corpn. 79-87 539 9445489477 14 Rajapandi.A Chennai Corpn. 88-96 540 9444212556 15 Loganathan.K Chennai Corpn. 97-103 541 9444245359 16 RajaMohamed.T Chennai Corpn.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Food Safety Officers
    LIST OF FOOD SAFETY OFFICER State S.No Name of Food Safety Area of Operation Address Contact No. Email address Officer /District ANDAMAN & 1. Smti. Sangeeta Naseem South Andaman District Food Safety Office, 09434274484 [email protected] NICOBAR District Directorate of Health Service, G. m ISLANDS B. Pant Road, Port Blair-744101 2. Smti. K. Sahaya Baby South Andaman -do- 09474213356 [email protected] District 3. Shri. A. Khalid South Andaman -do- 09474238383 [email protected] District 4. Shri. R. V. Murugaraj South Andaman -do- 09434266560 [email protected] District m 5. Shri. Tahseen Ali South Andaman -do- 09474288888 [email protected] District 6. Shri. Abdul Shahid South Andaman -do- 09434288608 [email protected] District 7. Smti. Kusum Rai South Andaman -do- 09434271940 [email protected] District 8. Smti. S. Nisha South Andaman -do- 09434269494 [email protected] District 9. Shri. S. S. Santhosh South Andaman -do- 09474272373 [email protected] District 10. Smti. N. Rekha South Andaman -do- 09434267055 [email protected] District 11. Shri. NagoorMeeran North & Middle District Food Safety Unit, 09434260017 [email protected] Andaman District Lucknow, Mayabunder-744204 12. Shri. Abdul Aziz North & Middle -do- 09434299786 [email protected] Andaman District 13. Shri. K. Kumar North & Middle -do- 09434296087 kkumarbudha68@gmail. Andaman District com 14. Smti. Sareena Nadeem Nicobar District District Food Safety Unit, Office 09434288913 [email protected] of the Deputy Commissioner , m Car Nicobar ANDHRA 1. G.Prabhakara Rao, Division-I, O/o The Gazetted Food 7659045567 [email protected] PRDESH Food Safety Officer Srikakulam District Inspector, Kalinga Road, 2. K.Kurmanayakulu, Division-II, Srikakulam District, 7659045567 [email protected] LIST OF FOOD SAFETY OFFICER State S.No Name of Food Safety Area of Operation Address Contact No.
    [Show full text]
  • S.NO Name of District Name of Block Name of Village Population Name
    STATE LEVEL BANKERS' COMMITTEE, TAMIL NADU CONVENOR: INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK PROVIDING BANKING SERVICES IN VILLAGE HAVING POPULATION OF OVER 2000 DISTRICTWISE ALLOCATION OF VILLAGES -01.11.2011 Name of S.NO Name of Block Name of Village Population Name of the Bank Name of Branch District 1 Ariyalur Andiamadam Anikudichan (South) 2730 Indian Bank Andimadam 2 Ariyalur Andiamadam Athukurichi 5540 Bank of India Alagapuram 3 Ariyalur Andiamadam Ayyur 3619 State Bank of India Edayakurichi 4 Ariyalur Andiamadam Kodukkur 3023 State Bank of India Edayakurichi 5 Ariyalur Andiamadam Koovathur (North) 2491 Indian Bank Andimadam 6 Ariyalur Andiamadam Koovathur (South) 3909 Indian Bank Andimadam 7 Ariyalur Andiamadam Marudur 5520 Canara Bank Elaiyur 8 Ariyalur Andiamadam Melur 2318 Canara Bank Elaiyur 9 Ariyalur Andiamadam Olaiyur 2717 Bank of India Alagapuram 10 Ariyalur Andiamadam Periakrishnapuram 5053 State Bank of India Varadarajanpet 11 Ariyalur Andiamadam Silumbur 2660 State Bank of India Edayakurichi 12 Ariyalur Andiamadam Siluvaicheri 2277 Bank of India Alagapuram 13 Ariyalur Andiamadam Thirukalappur 4785 State Bank of India Varadarajanpet 14 Ariyalur Andiamadam Variyankaval 4125 Canara Bank Elaiyur 15 Ariyalur Andiamadam Vilandai (North) 2012 Indian Bank Andimadam 16 Ariyalur Andiamadam Vilandai (South) 9663 Indian Bank Andimadam 17 Ariyalur Ariyalur Andipattakadu 3083 State Bank of India Reddipalayam 18 Ariyalur Ariyalur Arungal 2868 State Bank of India Ariyalur 19 Ariyalur Ariyalur Edayathankudi 2008 State Bank of India Ariyalur 20 Ariyalur
    [Show full text]
  • Tamil Nadu Government Gazette
    © [Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2012-14. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [R. Dis. No. 197/2009. 2018 [Price : Rs. 8.80 Paise. TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 33] CHENNAI, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2018 Aadi 30 , Vilambi, Thiruvalluvar Aandu – 2049 Part VI—Section 1 Notifications of interest to the General Public issued by Heads of Departments, Etc. NOTIFICATIONS BY HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS, ETC. CONTENTS PPages.ages. GENERAL NOTIFICATIONS Preparation and Sanction of the Arappanancheri Detailed Development Plan No. 4 of Kancheepuram Local Planning Authority. .. .. .. .. .. .. 226868 Variation to the Approved Master Plan for the Kancheepuram Local Planning Area. .. 2268-26968-269 Variations to the Approved Master Plan for the Coimbatore Local Planning Area. .. 227070 DIRECTOR OF SUGAR AND CANE COMMISSIONER, CHENNAI Demarcation of the sugarcane areas among Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd, Kolundampattu, Tiruvannamalai District, Tirupattur Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Kethandapatti, Vellore District, Kallakurichi-I Co-operative Sugar Mill Ltd., Moongilthuraipattu, Villupuram District and Subramaniya Siva Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Gobalapuram, Dharmapuri District as per the Orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in W.A.No.401/1998, etc. - Recommendations of the 49th Area Delimitation Committee meeting held on 19-01-2018, etc. .. 2270-27270-272 JUDICIAL NOTIFICATIONS Code of Criminal Procedure–Conferment of powers .. .. .. .. .. 2272-27672-276 HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FOOD SAFETY AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Areas Notifi ed by the Commissioner of Food Safety for the Purpose of Performing duties under the Food Safety and Standards Act Rules and Regulations. .. .. .. 2276-28776-287 DTP—VI-1 (33)—1 267 268 TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE [Part VI—Sec.1 NOTIFICATIONS BY HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS, ETC.
    [Show full text]
  • Sree Saraswathi Thyagaraja College
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTS, SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES (A Peer-Reviewed-Refereed/Scholarly Quarterly Journal Globally Indexed with Impact Factor) Vol. 5 Special Issue 4 March, 2018 Impact Factor: 2.114 ISSN: 2321-788X UGC Approval No: 43960 Two Day National Seminar on GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ISSUES AND CONCERNS 23rd & 24th March 2018 Sponsored by NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN New Delhi Organised by PG & RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK SREE SARASWATHI THYAGARAJA COLLEGE An Antonomous NAAC Re – Accredited with ‘A’ Grade, ISO 9001: Certified Institution, Affiliated to Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Approved by AICTE of MBA/MCA and by UGC for 2(f) & 12(B) Status Pollachi – 642 107, Coimbatore Dist, Tamil Nadu Ln.T.Sethupati Secretary Sree Saraswathi Thyagaraja College (Autonomous) Pollachi, Tamilnadu Social Work practice is quite distinctive from other professions in its approach of assisting clients to function optimally within their environments. Women in India face lots of social issues and problems all through the life which are big challenge and struggle for them right from cradle to grave. Female infanticide is the most common practice of killing girl child in mother’s womb in the rural Indian society. Women in India are considered as burden for their parents and husbands as they think that women are here only to spend and consume money in whole of their life without their share and contribution. Another common problem for women is sex discrimination which they face from their birth and continues till their death. Illiteracy, lack of proper education, house cares, rape, sexual harassment at workplace, etc are some of the other big issues for the women in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ground Water Quality in Kailasapuram, Tiruchirappalli,Tamil Nadu, India
    Available online a twww.scholarsresearchlibrary.com Scholars Research Library Archives of Applied Science Research, 2015, 7 (7): 12-18 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html ) ISSN 0975-508X CODEN (USA) AASRC9 Assessment of ground water quality in Kailasapuram, Tiruchirappalli,Tamil Nadu, India G. Maheswari Devi and S. Umamaheswari* P.G and Research Department of Zoology, Periyar EVR College, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Cauvery river is the lifeline of the population residing in Tiruchirappalli district. They are dependent on ground water as their prime source of drinking water. Hence, monitoring the quality of ground water is necessary in order to provide the public with potable water. This paper reports the physiochemical parameters of bore and well water at the site exposed to treated waste water from industries. The mean pH, TS, TDS, TSS, TH, Calcium, Alkalinity, Acidity, Total Nitrogen and Sodium and Mercury of well water exceeded the permissible limits of TNPCB. On the other hand, mean pH, TS, TDS, TSS,TH, Ca, alkalinity, acidity, Total Nitrogen and Sodium were found to be above the permissible limits of TNPCB. These could be attributed to seepage of treated industrial waste water into the ground water. Key words : Physicochemical parameters, Water quality, groundwater, treated industrial waste water. __________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The efflux of industrial waste water into the environment may adversely affect the ground water quality. Ground water is used for irrigation, industries and domestic supply. In Tiruchirappalli district, majority of the population depend on the ground water as their prime source of drinking water supply. Rapid growth of urban areas have affected the ground water quality, due to over exploitation of resources and improper waste disposal [1].
    [Show full text]