DOCSLIB.ORG

Clean Water for Less Integrated Planning Reduces the Cost of Meeting Water Quality Goals in New Hampshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clean Water for Less Integrated Planning Reduces the Cost of Meeting Water Quality Goals in New Hampshire University of New Hampshire CARSEY RESEARCH Carsey School of Public Policy Regional Issue Brief #47 Spring 2016 Clean Water for Less Integrated Planning Reduces the Cost of Meeting Water Quality Goals in New Hampshire Alison Watts, Robert Roseen, Paul E. Stacey, Renee Bourdeau, and Theresa Walker Summary Rising populations and increased development in New Hampshire coastal communities have led to a decline in water quality in the Great Bay Estuary. Responding effectively and affordably to new federal permit requirements for treating and discharging stormwater and wastewater will require innovative solutions from communities in the area. In March 2015, the Water Integration for Squamscott–Exeter (WISE) project completed an integrated planning framework through which the coastal communities of Exeter, Stratham, and Newfields could more afford- ably manage permits for wastewater and stormwa- ter. However, meeting maximum goals for nitrogen reduction will require collaboration and commitment from all municipalities in the watershed, whether regulated under the Clean Water Act or not. Introduction The New Hampshire Great Bay Estuary and portions surface water, require nitrogen controls as low as 3 mil- of the tidal rivers that flow into it have been negatively ligrams per liter (mg/l)—the lowest technically feasible impacted by human development. The Piscataqua level—on effluent from wastewater treatment plants.2 Region Estuaries Partnership has identified caution- Municipalities, EPA regulators, and community stake- ary or negative conditions or trends in fifteen of holders are now discussing strategies that would allow twenty-two indicators of ecosystem health.1 In 2009 communities flexibility to integrate permit requirements many parts of the estuary were listed as “impaired” by between wastewater and stormwater, and/or combine the New Hampshire Department of Environmental requirements among multiple permit holders in order to Services (NHDES) on measures such as nitrogen over- devise control options that might be more cost-effective. enrichment. Though nitrogen is naturally present in The enactment of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in estuarine water, excess amounts support algae growth, 1972, with its ambitious goals to restore the chemi- decrease oxygen, and ultimately damage aquatic spe- cal, physical, and biological integrity of U.S. surface cies. Permits now issued by the U.S. Environmental waters and to eliminate pollutant discharges by 1985, Protection Agency (EPA), which regulates discharges to led to dramatic improvements in water quality, as 2 CARSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY wastewater and industrial dis- FIGURE 1. THE EXETER–SQUAMSCOTT WATERSHED charges were treated or eliminated. These “point sources” (discharges from a single location, such as a pipe) are now largely regulated through permits that restrict pollutants based on the condi- tion of the receiving water body. However, nonpoint sources, such as agricultural runoff, groundwa- ter, atmospheric deposition, and diffuse runoff from the land are not generally restricted under the Clean Water Act. The regulation of sources generated by multiple parties is difficult, and federal and state agencies are currently working to develop more effec- tive and pragmatic approaches. These include integration among permits, individual or regional watershed-based permitting, and the expansion of regulatory author- ity to control nonpoint sources. All of these methods are potentially applicable to the Great Bay region. How Integrated Planning Works Existing wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs) in the Great Bay region currently operate under discharge permits which set effluent limits on harmful Note: The communities of Exeter, Stratham, and Newfields border the Exeter–Squamscott River. pollutants. Many communities Municipal discharges to the river must comply with stringent nitrogen wastewater discharge permits. in the region must also address Source: From: The Lower Exeter and Squamscott Rivers, A Report to the General Court New Hamp- the discharge of urban stormwa- shire Rivers Management and Protection Program, Department of Environmental Services Office of the ter under a municipal separate Commissioner, Febrary 2011. storm sewer system (MS4) permit. Nonregulated discharges, such as Integrated planning and inte- narrows the options for more stormwater outside of urban areas, grated permitting allow munici- cost-efficient approaches to water are addressed only voluntarily, palities to meet multiple permit management.3 Consequently, if at all, and may be a significant requirements under an overarch- the EPA has become receptive to source of pollution. The MS4 ing structure that may encompass municipal proposals for integrated permits are not connected to the several municipalities or private plans that allow local officials to wastewater treatment permits, and parties (see Box 1). The EPA rec- prioritize actions across multiple historically little coordination has ognizes that meeting the goals of permits. Recently issued WWTF occurred between the programs. water-related permits individually permits to the towns of Exeter CARSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY 3 and Newmarket in southern New The Exeter–Squamscott Box 1: Definitions Hampshire include provisions that Watershed allow nitrogen reductions from Integrated Planning—Individual both regulated and nonregulated The Exeter River, in southeastern permits are issued, but permit stormwater and nonpoint sources New Hampshire, runs approximately requirements are combined under to be used to meet permit limits. 30 miles from the town of Chester to a local agreement, such as a memo- The communities are still required the Great Dam in downtown Exeter. randum of understanding. to upgrade their wastewater facili- Below the dam the river is renamed ties, but they may, for example, be the Squamscott, and forms part of the Integrated Permitting—A single able to avoid some costs associated Great Bay tidal estuary (Figure 1). permit combines obligations with reducing nitrogen levels in The watershed encompasses from multiple permits. The per- wastewater by reducing nitrogen 80,000 acres and includes portions mittees are mutually obligated to levels in stormwater. Additional of thirteen municipalities. The lower meet requirements. For instance, cost savings could derive from Exeter–Squamscott River subwater- stormwater and wastewater obli- a regional approach that meets shed, which includes the communities gations for one or more commu- targeted reductions by prioritizing of Exeter, Stratham, and Newfields, nities could be combined. lower-cost treatments across encompasses 19,000 acres—24 per- Watershed-Based Permitting—A a larger landscape. cent of the total—but generates nearly single permit is issued to all of the 50 percent of the nitrogen released to entities within a watershed region. the river (Figure 2). FIGURE 2. SOURCES OF NITROGEN IN THE SUBWATERSHED Note: Exeter, Stratham, and Newfields generate approximately 50% of the nitrogen load to the Exeter–Squamscott River. The remaining inputs come from developed and natural land in the upper watershed. Loads are in tons per year. 4 CARSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY Only two of these munici- What Is the Advantage of Fifty-year lifecycle costs, which palities, Exeter and Newfields, Integrated Planning? include facility operations and currently generate wastewater dis- maintenance, are estimated at charges that require EPA permits. If communities work together, they $100 million–$220 million for Stratham is unregulated now, but can prioritize nitrogen reduction the three communities (Figure 4). it has been notified of a pending strategies across the watershed, Integrated subwatershed planning MS4 permit requirement. starting with the most cost-effec- presents a potential cost benefit In 2013, the Water Integration for tive actions. Figure 3 shows the of over $100 million. Much of the Squamscott–Exeter (WISE) project4 capital cost associated with three savings is achieved by applying was initiated to develop a frame- scenarios: integrated subwatershed the most cost effective treatments work for an integrated nitrogen con- planning, where the three com- first, regardless of municipal or trol plan for these communities. The munities work to meet all permit permit boundaries. project brought together municipal requirements together; individual decision makers, the Rockingham community permitting, where each What Are the Drawbacks Planning Commission, the Great community addresses each of its to Integrated Planning? Bay Estuarine Reserve, univer- permits separately; and integrated sity researchers, and engineering permitting, where one community Integrated planning allows flex- consultants to work with state and (Exeter) combines requirements for ibility in both the timing and federal regulators to identify permit two permits, without coordinating methods used to meet the required elements amenable for integration with other communities. The WISE pollutant load reductions, but it and to develop scenarios combin- cost analysis found that the greatest can be enforced only to entities ing alternative levels of treatment degree of cooperation—integrated that are already subject to permits. that would be acceptable to the subwatershed planning—leads to In order to meet recommended regulatory agencies. The project the greatest cost savings. team developed nitrogen control strategies for a range of potential FIGURE 3. COST DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATED WITH THREE PERMITTING scenarios based on permit require-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NH Trout Stocking - April 2018
    NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 111 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 ALSTEAD NEWELL POND 1 ALSTEAD WARREN LAKE 1 ALTON BEAVER BROOK 1 ALTON COFFIN BROOK 1 ALTON HURD BROOK 1 ALTON WATSON BROOK 1 ALTON WEST ALTON BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 11 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 11 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 11 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 11 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 1 1 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BELMONT POUT POND 1 BELMONT TIOGA RIVER 1 BELMONT WHITCHER BROOK 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 11 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BERLIN ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 11 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 11 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER 11 BRISTOL PEMIGEWASSET RIVER 11 BRISTOL SMITH RIVER 11 BROOKFIELD CHURCHILL BROOK 1 BROOKFIELD PIKE BROOK 1 BROOKLINE NISSITISSIT RIVER 11 CAMBRIDGE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 1 CAMPTON BOG POND 1 CAMPTON PERCH POND 11 CANAAN CANAAN STREET LAKE 11 CANAAN INDIAN RIVER 11 NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 CANAAN MASCOMA RIVER, UPPER 11 CANDIA TOWER HILL POND 1 CANTERBURY SPEEDWAY POND 1 CARROLL AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 CARROLL SACO LAKE 1 CENTER HARBOR WINONA LAKE 1 CHATHAM BASIN POND 1 CHATHAM LOWER KIMBALL POND 1 CHESTER EXETER RIVER 1 CHESTERFIELD SPOFFORD LAKE 1 CHICHESTER SANBORN BROOK
    [Show full text]
  • A Nomination of the Lower Exeter/Squamscott River to the New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program
    A Nomination of the Lower Exeter/Squamscott River to the New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program Photo Credit – Ralph Morang Submitted by the Exeter River Local Advisory Committee May 24, 2010 Revised June 21, 2010 This project was funded by grant funds from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Table of Contents Page SECTION I Nomination Information ...................................................................... 1 SECTION II Summary: Resources of Statewide or Local Significance ..................... 2 SECTION III Community and Public Support ............................................................ 7 SECTION IV Other Supporting Information .............................................................. 9 SECTION V River Classifications ............................................................................. 11 SECTION VI Maps.................................................................................................... 12 SECTION VII Resource Assessment ......................................................................... 13 1. Natural Resources ............................................................................... 13 a. Geologic Resource ..................................................................... 13 b. Wildlife Resources ..................................................................... 14 c. Vegetation/Natural Communities ............................................. 21 d. Fish Resources ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Management Plan (2009)
    TRAIL MANAGEMENT PLAN EXETER, NEW HAMPSHIRE PREPARED BY: Exeter Environmental Associates, Inc . P.O. Box 451 Exeter, NH 03833-0451 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: Exeter Trails Committee PREPARED FOR: Town of Exeter Exeter Planning Department Exeter Conservation Commission Town Offices, 10 Front Street, Exeter, NH 03833 December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER 1.0 INTRODUCTION and OBJECTIVE of TRAIL PLAN................................... 1 2.0 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY of TRAIL NETWORK..................................... 4 Enwright Property………………………………………………………… 4 Exeter Country Club and Allen Street Trails…………………………….. 7 Fresh River /Beech Hill Trails……………………………………………. 9 Henderson-Swasey Town Forest Trails.…………………………………. 11 Jolly Rand Trails…………………………………………………………. 17 Juniper Ridge and Mill Pond Road Trails……………………………….. 20 Linden Street Trails………………………………………………………. 23 Little River Trails………………………………………………………… 26 Oaklands Town Forest and Forest Ridge Trails...……………………….. 29 Phillips Exeter Academy Trails………………………………………….. 34 Raynes Farm……………………………………………………………… 35 Smith-Page Conservation Land Trails…………………………………… 38 Snowmobile Trails…………………………………………...…………… 41 3.0 TRAIL MAINTENANCE................................................................................. 42 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS for TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS ............................. 46 4.1 General……………………………………………………………… 46 4.2 Funding……………………………………………………………… 46 4.3 Construction Standards……………………………………………… 46 4.4 Trail Markers and Signage Standards………………………………. 47 4.5 Specific Improvements………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Fish
    Appendix A: Fish Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus Federal Listing State Listing SC Global Rank G5 State Rank S5 High Regional Status Photo by NHFG Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) Alewife numbers have declined significantly throughout their range. Commercial landings of river herring, a collective term for alewives and blueback herring, have declined by 93% since 1985 (ASMFC 2009). Dams severely limit accessible anadromous fish spawning habitat, and alewives must use fish ladders for access to most spawning habitat in New Hampshire during spring spawning runs. River herring are a key component of freshwater, estuarine, and marine food webs (Bigelow and Schroeder 1953). They are an important source of prey for many predators, and they contribute nutrients to freshwater ecosystems (Macavoy et al. 2000). Distribution The alewife is found in Atlantic coastal rivers from Newfoundland to North Carolina. It has been introduced into a number of inland waterbodies (Scott and Crossman 1973). In New Hampshire, alewives migrate into the Merrimack River and the seacoast drainages (Scarola 1987). Habitat Adult alewives migrate from the ocean into freshwater spawning habitats with slow moving water, including riverine oxbows, lakes, ponds, and mid‐river sites (Scott and Crossman 1973). Juveniles remain in freshwater until late summer and early fall when they migrate downstream into estuaries and eventually to the ocean. There is little information available on alewife movement and habitat use in the ocean. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Fish-21 Appendix A: Fish NH Wildlife Action Plan Habitats ● Large Warmwater Rivers ● Warmwater Lakes and Ponds ● Warmwater Rivers and Streams Distribution Map Current Species and Habitat Condition in New Hampshire Coastal Watersheds: Alewife populations in the coastal watersheds are generally stable or increasing in recent years at fish ladders where river herring and other diadromous species have been monitored since 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    Water Resources Town of Newmarket Master Plan Adopted unanimously by the Newmarket Planning Board following a Public Hearing on November 10, 2020. Master Plan: Water Resources Chapter Town of Newmarket, New Hampshire 10.01.2020 Page 2 Master Plan: Water Resources Chapter Town of Newmarket, New Hampshire Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 Vision Statement ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Water Resource Chapter Update ......................................................................................................... 7 Surface & Groundwater Resources ............................................................................. 8 Rivers & Perennial Brooks, Creeks, Streams, and Tributaries ............................................................... 8 Buffer Functions and Benefits ............................................................................................................... 10 Water Quality Impairments .................................................................................................................. 12 Lakes,
    [Show full text]
  • Exeter River Project to Begin in July Supply
    Volume XXXVI No. 7 Brentwood, New Hampshire July-August 2012 Exeter River Project to Begin in July supply. The problem looms and we all should be doing whatever we can at whatever level to protect the future This summer, Brentwood will begin work on a of our environment. project to improve storm-water management and restore the buffers along the Exeter River on Haigh Road and Brentwood is stepping up to the challenge as Rowell Road West. Currently, water flows from those best we can, to do our part to protect our little piece of roads into the river and the vegetation is not adequate to the world, in two ways. Firstly, we elected to fund a $2 absorb it, and so it carries sand, silt and nitrogen into the million bond in 2003 to protect open space, which has river. been leveraged to protect over $7 million worth of land, using federal grants, donations and independent trans- The river bank along Rowell Road West, where actions to make up the difference. We are now at the the storm-water drains, is still an attractive spot for point where 25% of our 16 square miles are under ease- recreation, being used for swimming, fishing and ment protection, including 2.5 miles along the Exeter boating, and even skating in favorable winters. This land River. is owned by Carole and Norman Wilson and there is no official landing, so that people using the river make Secondly, we have worked to keep pollutants out of multiple trails through the narrow woodland and shrubs the river by protecting and improving buffers along the to approach the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Piscataquog River Management Plan Update 2010
    PISCATAQUOG RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2010 PISCATAQUOG RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 1 Special Acknowledgements In Memory of: Beverly Yeaple, PRLAC Committee Member From the time of its formation, Beverly Yeaple served on the Piscataquog River Local Advisory Committee (PRLAC) as the representative from Deering. She contributed significantly to the publication of the first edition of this River Management Plan and participated regularly in the business of the Committee, serving for a time as its Chair. As this update to the plan is prepared, Bev unfortunately passed away. Her knowledge, dedication, good humor, and commitment to the protection of the Piscataquog River Watershed has set a high standard for those who follow and will not be forgotten. June 2010 Cover photos provided by Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission PISCATAQUOG RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2 Prepared By: Piscataquog River Local Advisory Committee & Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission 438 Dubuque Street – Manchester, NH 03102 Phone: 603-669-4664 Fax: 603-669-4350 www.snhpc.org June 2010 Piscataquog River Local Advisory Committee Members: Jane Beaulieu – Manchester Andrew Cadorette – Goffstown Linda Kunhardt – Francestown Dick Ludders – Weare John Magee – At-Large Betsey McNaughten – Deering John Turcotte – Goffstown Janet White – New Boston Acknowledgements: Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission: David Preece, Executive Director; Linda Moore, Executive Secretary; Jack Munn, Chief Planner; Derek Serach, Planning Intern; and all other SNHPC Staff for their assistance with monthly agendas, meeting minutes, and technical support for this update. Piscataquog Land Conservancy: Eric Masterson, Executive Director for their commitment to the Piscataquog River and its watershed. The Nomination Report prepared by the PLC was an invaluable resource in developing this Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Piscataqua Area Place Names and History
    PISCATAQUA AREA PLACE NAMES AND HISTORY by Sylvia Fitts Getchell Adams Point. Formerly known as Matthews Neck, q.v. Agamenticus. York. Originally the name applied by the Indians to what is now called York River. Early settlers used the term for the area about the river. [Used today only for Mount Agamenticus (in York)] Ambler’s Islands. Three small islands off Durham Point near the mouth of Oyster River. Ambush Rock. In Eliot. Where Maj. Chas. Frost was killed by Indians July 4, 1697 (about a mile N. of his garrison on his way home from Church at Great Works). Appledore Island. Named for a Parish in Northam, England. Early named Hog Island. Largest of the Isles of Shoals. Now in ME. [Name Appledore was used 1661-1679 for all the islands when they were briefly a township under Mass. Gov’t.] Arundel. See Cape Porpus. Acbenbedick River. Sometimes called the Little Newichawannock. Now known as Great Works River. First mills (saw mill and stamping mill) in New England using water power built here 1634 by carpenters sent to the colony by Mason. [Leader brothers took over the site (1651) for their mills. See also Great Works.] Ass Brook. Flows from Exeter into Taylor’s River. Atkinson’s Hill. In SW part of Back River District of Dover. Part in Dover, part in Madbury. Also known as Laighton’s Hill (Leighton’s). Back River. Tidal river W of Dover Neck. Back River District. Lands between Back River & Durham line from Cedar Point to Johnson’s Creek Bridge. Part now in Madbury, part in Dover.
    [Show full text]
  • Exeter-Squamscott River Subwatershed
    EXETER-SQUAMSCOTT RIVER SUBWATERSHED Photo by Malcolm Wesselink PISCATAQUA REGION ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ASSESSMENT 2015 Exeter-Squamscott River Subwatershed, including: Brentwood, Chester, Danville, East Kingston, Exeter, Fremont, Kensington, Kingston, Newfields, Sandown, Stratham www.prepestuaries.org Exeter-Squamscott River Subwatershed INTRODUCTION The Exeter River rises from a group of spring- increasing amounts of impervious surfaces fed ponds in Chester, New Hampshire and from roads, parking lots, and building roofs, flows 33 miles to downtown Exeter where its fragmentation of forestland and wetlands, name changes to the Squamscott River and installation of septic systems, and increases in becomes a tidal river and primary tributary to groundwater withdrawals for drinking wells the Great Bay estuary The Exeter-Squamscott (ESRLAC 2012) River watershed drains an area of approxi- mately 128 square miles (81,726 acres) and includes portions of 12 towns in southeastern Table of Contents New Hampshire The total population for Threats watershed communities in 2010 was 68,245 Nitrogen and Impervious Cover 3 The Exeter-Squamscott River watershed Findings Report Cards 4-5 includes some of the fastest growing com- munities in New Hampshire Population Actions By Town 6-7 growth and land development have created Balance is key. PREP recommends no more than 10% impervious cover and no less than 20% conservation land in a watershed. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (5.3%) CONSERVED LAND (16.8%) PAGE 2 • EXETER-SQUAMSCOTT RIVER SUBWATERSHED • 2015 PISCATAQUA
    [Show full text]
  • The Exeter and Squamscott Rivers
    WD-R&L-6 2019 The Exeter and Squamscott Rivers The Exeter and Squamscott rivers are a single river system with two names. The Exeter River is the upstream, freshwater segment while the Squamscott River is the downstream, tidally-influenced segment. The Exeter River begins in the town of Chester and flows east through the towns of Sandown, Raymond, Fremont and Brentwood to Exeter. In Exeter, the river becomes the Squamscott and continues northward through Stratham and Newfields before discharging into Great Bay. Together, the Exeter and Squamscott rivers drain approximately 125 square miles, including broad wetlands, forested riverbanks and gently flowing waters. The river system plays an essential role in maintaining the overall health of the Great Bay National Estuarine Reserve, is home to a number of rare and endangered species, and is an important scenic resource. For these reasons, the rivers have been recognized not only by the New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program (RMPP), but also as part of the New Hampshire Resource Protection Project. The upper 33.3 miles of the Exeter River, from its headwaters to its confluence with Great Brook in Exeter, were designated into the RMPP in 1995, while the remaining 2.2 miles of the lower Exeter and the 6.3-mile Squamscott River were added in 2011. Land use along the Exeter and Squamscott rivers is primarily rural. The upper reaches of the river corridor through Chester, Sandown and Danville contain scattered farms and single family homes, and the riverbank is largely forested with interspersed areas of wetlands. Land around the lower reaches of the river supports more industrial and commercial uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Hampton Falls 2019 Master Plan
    Town of Hampton Falls 2019 Master Plan Dedication It has always been said that Hampton Falls is a community of volunteers, and nobody set a better example of volunteerism than Charlyn Brown. As a long-time resident and volunteer, Charlyn always worked tirelessly to make sure Hampton Falls maintained its rural character and charm. She was a Planning Board member from 1994 - 2017, serving as either Chair of Vice Chair during many of these years. As a function of being a Planning Board member, she was also a member of the Capital Improvement Committee, Ordinance and Regulations Review Committee, and of course two rounds of being on the Master Plan Committee. As an example of her leadership, in 2011 she received a Municipal Leadership Award from the Workforce Housing Coalition for her work on the town’s workforce housing regulations. It was a sad day when she decided not to run for re-election in 2017, but in true Charlyn form she stayed on the Master Plan committee until the work was fully complete in 2019. Prior to her Planning Board work she was a member of the School Board from 1988-1990, serving as Chair in 1990. She was always very proud to mention that she was an English teacher for many years at Winnacunnet High School. Charlyn married longtime Hampton Falls resident Forrest Brown and they raised their son Glenn at their home on Exeter Road, which was built on land that was part of Forrest’s family farm. Forrest was also a member of the Planning Board from 1967 – 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • NH Trout Stocking - May 2019
    NH Trout Stocking - May 2019 Town WaterBody 4/29‐5/03 5/06‐5/10 5/13‐5/17 5/20‐5/24 5/27‐5/31 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 1 1 1 ALBANY FALLS POND 1 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALBANY SWIFT RIVER 1 ALEXANDRIA CLARK BROOK 1 ALEXANDRIA FOWLER RIVER 1 ALEXANDRIA SMITH RIVER 1 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK KIDS POND 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 1 AMHERST JOE ENGLISH BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 1 1 1 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 1 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 1 1 1 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 1 1 ANDOVER SUCKER BROOK 1 ANTRIM NORTH BRANCH 1 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 ASHLAND OWL BROOK 1 ASHLAND SQUAM RIVER 1 ATKINSON TRINITY POND 1 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 BARNSTEAD BIG RIVER 1 BARNSTEAD CROOKED RUN 1 BARNSTEAD LITTLE RIVER 1 BARNSTEAD LOUGEE POND 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON NIPPO BROOK 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT ELLIS RIVER 1 BARTLETT SACO RIVER 1 BARTLETT SACO RIVER, EAST BRANCH 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BATH AMMONOOSUC RIVER 11 BATH AMMONOOSUC RIVER, WILD 1 1 BATH PETTYBORO BROOK 1 BENNINGTON CONTOOCOOK RIVER 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 1 BENTON GLENCLIFF HOME POND 1 BENTON OLIVERIAN BROOK 1 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BENTON TUNNEL BROOK 1 NH Trout Stocking - May 2019 Town WaterBody 4/29‐5/03 5/06‐5/10 5/13‐5/17 5/20‐5/24 5/27‐5/31 BETHLEHEM AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 BOSCAWEN MERRIMACK RIVER 1 BOW FIREHOUSE POND 1 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRIDGEWATER CLAY BROOK 1 BRIDGEWATER WHITTEMORE BROOK 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER
    [Show full text]