Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
William Seward and the Trent Affair
William Seward and the Trent Affair http://civilwar150.longwood.edu In late December, 1861, the Trent Affair continued to dominate national and international news, with President Lincoln and his secretary of state, William Seward, both playing major roles in ending the controversy. Born in Orange County, New York in 1801, William H. Seward was one of the most prominent anti-slavery politicians of the mid-1800s, first as a Whig and then as a Republican. He had studied law at Union College in 1820 and within a few years entered the world of politics. Starting in 1830, Seward served in the New York state senate, and in 1838 he became governor of New York for the first of two terms. Even though Seward was born into a slave owning family, his abolitionist stance made him well known and in 1849 and 1855 he was elected to the U.S. Senate. In the aftermath of the Compromise of 1850 he had gained prominence for his “Higher Law” speech opposing the expansion of slavery. Seward hoped to obtain the Republican nomination for president in 1860, and was disappointed when the party chose Abraham Lincoln as its standard bearer. After Lincoln won the presidential election, Seward accepted the position of Secretary of State, hoping he could influence the less- experienced president. Seward and Lincoln clashed over various issues during the early months of the administration, but he eventually developed into an able and loyal cabinet member. In early November 1861, Captain Charles Wilkes of the U.S.S. San Jacinto had seized Confederate diplomats James Mason and John Slidell from British ship Trent. -
Diplomacy and the American Civil War: the Impact on Anglo- American Relations
James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses, 2020-current The Graduate School 5-8-2020 Diplomacy and the American Civil War: The impact on Anglo- American relations Johnathan Seitz Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/masters202029 Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Seitz, Johnathan, "Diplomacy and the American Civil War: The impact on Anglo-American relations" (2020). Masters Theses, 2020-current. 56. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/masters202029/56 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses, 2020-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Diplomacy and the American Civil War: The Impact on Anglo-American Relations Johnathan Bryant Seitz A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2020 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Dr. Steven Guerrier Committee Members/ Readers: Dr. David Dillard Dr. John Butt Table of Contents List of Figures..................................................................................................................iii Abstract............................................................................................................................iv Introduction.......................................................................................................................1 -
Book Otice: Kentucky Soldiers and Their Regiments in the Civil War
Book otice: Kentucky Soldiers and Their Regiments in the Civil War Abstracted from the Pages of Contemporary ewspapers Written by Dan Reigle for the Ohio Civil War Genealogy Journal , Vol. XIV (2010), No. 3. Five volumes, each covering one year of the 1861-1865 period. Steven L. Wright. Utica KY: McDowell Publications. Copyright by author, 2009. (Ordering information is at the end of this notice.) Thanks to Don Rightmyer, editor of Kentucky Ancestors , for making us aware of this new resource. In the Winter 2010 issue of Kentucky Ancestors , Don used the word “monumental” to describe this newly-published set of books, stating that they make “a tremendous contribution to the published history of the experiences of Kentucky men during the Civil War.” I agree, having used the books immediately after receiving them to annotate Darrell Helton’s submission of documents on the engagements at Cotton Hill, south of Charleston WV in November 1861. We all know the unique value of newspaper research in our Civil War research and our genealogical research , and we also know how painfully difficult it can be to locate relevant newspapers and then to find in them the information we need. Mr. Wright has done a lot of heavy lifting for us. His objective was clearly stated in the Preface to the first volume: “This work is not about the big battles, although there is generally enough reference information to find the reports and narratives peppered through various issues of the newspapers from their correspondents. I have attempted to provide an adequate amount of abstracted information to allow researchers to follow up on their own interests, or simply to see a simplified version of events as they happened. -
University of Cincinnati
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:_December 13, 2006_ I, James Michael Rhyne______________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy in: History It is entitled: Rehearsal for Redemption: The Politics of Post-Emancipation Violence in Kentucky’s Bluegrass Region This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _Wayne K. Durrill_____________ _Christopher Phillips_________ _Wendy Kline__________________ _Linda Przybyszewski__________ Rehearsal for Redemption: The Politics of Post-Emancipation Violence in Kentucky’s Bluegrass Region A Dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in the Department of History of the College of Arts and Sciences 2006 By James Michael Rhyne M.A., Western Carolina University, 1997 M-Div., Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1989 B.A., Wake Forest University, 1982 Committee Chair: Professor Wayne K. Durrill Abstract Rehearsal for Redemption: The Politics of Post-Emancipation Violence in Kentucky’s Bluegrass Region By James Michael Rhyne In the late antebellum period, changing economic and social realities fostered conflicts among Kentuckians as tension built over a number of issues, especially the future of slavery. Local clashes matured into widespread, violent confrontations during the Civil War, as an ugly guerrilla war raged through much of the state. Additionally, African Americans engaged in a wartime contest over the meaning of freedom. Nowhere were these interconnected conflicts more clearly evidenced than in the Bluegrass Region. Though Kentucky had never seceded, the Freedmen’s Bureau established a branch in the Commonwealth after the war. -
Selected Bibliography from the Register of the Kentucky Historical Society
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY FROM THE REGISTER OF THE KENTUCKY HISTORICAL SOCIETY War of 1812 Adams, Evelyn Grady. “The Imprisonment of British Officers in the Frankfort Penitentiary during the War of 1812.” 49 (1951): 231-33. Bolt, Robert, “Vice President Richard M. Johnson of Kentucky: Hero of the Thames–Or the Great Amalgamator.” 75 (1977): 191-203. Analysis of a major military and political figure who broke the conventions of race and family. Clift, G. Glen, ed. “War of 1812 Diary of William B. Northcutt.” 56 (1958):165-81, 253-70, 325- 44. “Correspondence between Governor Isaac Shelby and General William Henry Harrison during the War of 1812.” 20 (1922): 130-44. Eubank, James Taylor. “The Siege of Fort Meigs.”19 (1921): 54-62. Dated but representative interpretation of a major militia operation. Fredriksen, John C., ed. “Kentucky at the Thames, 1813: A Rediscovered Narrative by William Greathouse.” 83 (1985): 93-107. New insights on an influential battle. Hall, Ellery L. “Canadian Annexation Sentiment in Kentucky Prior to the War of 1812.” 28 (1930): 372-80. Perspective on a major Kentucky motive for war. Harris, James Russell. “Kentuckians in the War of 1812; A Note on Numbers, Losses, and Sources.” 82 (1984): 277-86. Analysis of the traditionally large numbers cited for Kentuckians in service and killed in action which finds them undocumented and questionable. Hay, Robert Pettus. “A Jubilee for Freeman: The Fourth of July in Frontier Kentucky, 1788- 1816.” 64 (1966): 169-95. Hickey, Donald R., ed. “A Dissenting Voice: Matthew Lyon on the Conquest of Canada.” 76 (1978): 45-52. -
Chapter 11: the Civil War, 1861-1865
The Civil War 1861–1865 Why It Matters The Civil War was a milestone in American history. The four-year-long struggle determined the nation’s future. With the North’s victory, slavery was abolished. During the war, the Northern economy grew stronger, while the Southern economy stagnated. Military innovations, including the expanded use of railroads and the telegraph, coupled with a general conscription, made the Civil War the first “modern” war. The Impact Today The outcome of this bloody war permanently changed the nation. • The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery. • The power of the federal government was strengthened. The American Vision Video The Chapter 11 video, “Lincoln and the Civil War,” describes the hardships and struggles that Abraham Lincoln experienced as he led the nation in this time of crisis. 1862 • Confederate loss at Battle of Antietam 1861 halts Lee’s first invasion of the North • Fort Sumter fired upon 1863 • First Battle of Bull Run • Lincoln presents Emancipation Proclamation 1859 • Battle of Gettysburg • John Brown leads raid on federal ▲ arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia Lincoln ▲ 1861–1865 ▲ ▲ 1859 1861 1863 ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1861 1862 1863 • Russian serfs • Source of the Nile River • French troops 1859 emancipated by confirmed by John Hanning occupy Mexico • Work on the Suez Czar Alexander II Speke and James A. Grant City Canal begins in Egypt 348 Charge by Don Troiani, 1990, depicts the advance of the Eighth Pennsylvania Cavalry during the Battle of Chancellorsville. 1865 • Lee surrenders to Grant at Appomattox Courthouse • Abraham Lincoln assassinated by John Wilkes Booth 1864 • Fall of Atlanta HISTORY • Sherman marches ▲ A. -
Mr. Justice Stanton by James W
At Sidebar Mr. Justice Stanton by James W. Satola I love U.S. Supreme Court history. Sometimes, the more arcane the better. So, for my At Sidebar con- tribution, I want to share a little bit of what I love.1 Perhaps calling to mind the well-known story behind Marbury v. Madison, here is a lesser-known story of a presidential commission not delivered on time (though in this case, it was not anyone’s fault). The story of Mr. Justice Edwin M. Stanton.2 James W. Satola is an As one walks through the Grand Concourse of attorney in Cleveland, Ohio. From 2010 to the Ohio Supreme Court building in Columbus, Ohio 2016, he served as (officially, the Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center, an FBA Circuit Vice which had a first life as the “Ohio Departments Build- President for the Sixth ing,” opening in 1933, then restored and reopened as Circuit, and from 2002 the home of the Ohio Supreme Court in 2004), one’s to 2003, he was Presi- dent of the FBA Northern eye is drawn to nine large bronze plaques mounted District of Ohio Chapter. on the East Wall, each showcasing one of the U.S. © 2017 James W. Satola. Supreme Court justices named from Ohio.3 This story All rights reserved. is about the fourth plaque in that series, under which reads in brass type on the marble wall, “Edwin Mc- Masters Stanton, Justice of the United States Supreme Court, 1869-1869.” Justice Stanton? One finds no mention of “Justice Stanton” among the lists of the 113 men and women who have served on the Supreme Court of the United States. -
Longhunter, Southern Kentucky Genealogical Society Newsletter Volume 20, Number 4 Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected]
Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Longhunter, Southern Kentucky Genealogical Kentucky Library - Serials Society Newsletter Fall 1997 Longhunter, Southern Kentucky Genealogical Society Newsletter Volume 20, Number 4 Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/longhunter_sokygsn Part of the Genealogy Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Longhunter, Southern Kentucky Genealogical Society Newsletter Volume 20, Number 4" (1997). Longhunter, Southern Kentucky Genealogical Society Newsletter. Paper 129. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/longhunter_sokygsn/129 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Longhunter, Southern Kentucky Genealogical Society Newsletter by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME XX - ISSUE 4 SOUTHERN KENTUCKY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY P.o. Box 1782 Bowling Green, KY 42102 - 1782 1997 OFFICERS President Mark Lowe Springfield, TN ph. 800-556-4021 Vice President John E. Danielson, PO Box 1843 Bowling Green, KY 42102-1843 Recording Secretary Gail Miller, 425 Midcrest Dr. Bowling Green, KY 42101 ph. 502-781-1807 Corresponding Secretary Betty B. Lyne, 613 E. Ilth Ave. Bowling Green, KY 42101 ph. 502-843-9452 Treasurer Ramona Bobbitt. 2718 Smallhouse J<.d. Bowling Green, KY 42104 ph. 502-843-6918 Chaplain A. Ray Douglas, 439 Douglas Lane Bowling Green. KY 42101 ph. 502-842-7101 Longhunter Editors Sue and Dave Evans, 921 Meadowlark Dr. Bowling Green, KY 42103 ph. 502-842-2313 MEMBERS HlP Membership in the Southern Kentucky Genealogical Society is open to all persons, especially to those who are interested in research in Allen, Barren, Butler. -
Confederates Invade Maryland and Kentucky
Confederates Invade Maryland and Kentucky http://civilwar150.longwood.edu After the victory at Second Bull Run, Robert E. Lee began to set his sights on Union territory. Despite the carnage of the summer of 1862, including the recent battle and earlier battles around Richmond, Lee felt his remaining forces were up to an invasion of the North. He hoped to make it as far as Pennsylvania and with luck to be able to harass Washington, D.C. or Baltimore. Taking the war north of Virginia would open up vast new areas for food and supplies to Lee’s troops. The fields of Virginia were already being rapidly depleted. Lee also hoped that an invasion of the North would turn the tide of Northern public opinion against the war and with fall Congressional elections being held soon, perhaps Abraham Lincoln would be forced to negotiate peace with the Confederates. With many Southern sympathizers, perhaps there might even be an uprising within that state that would quickly lead Lincoln to make a move. Finally, Confederate President Jefferson Davis and his cabinet felt that an aggressive campaign in the North would go a long way toward bringing England or France onto the Southern side of the war. On September 4, the Army of Northern Virginia began to cross into Maryland from Loudon County. Expecting a friendly reception by the locals, some of the men sang “Maryland My Maryland” as they crossed into the border state. While some Maryland residents cheered their arrival, most residents hid in their homes as the troops in gray passed. -
Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History
Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History 2-2017 Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter (Feb. 2017) Manuscripts & Folklife Archives Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Folklife Archives, Manuscripts &, "Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter (Feb. 2017)" (2017). Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter. Paper 8. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war/8 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Founded March 2011 – Bowling Green, Kentucky President –Tom Carr; Vice President - Jonathan Jeffrey; Secretary – Carol Crowe-Carraco; Treasurer – Robert Dietle; Advisors – Glenn LaFantasie and - Greg Biggs (Program Chair and President-Clarksville CWRT) The Bowling Green, KY Civil War Round Table meets on the 3rd Tuesday of each month (except June, July, and December). Email: [email protected] We meet at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 21st in Cherry Hall 125 on the Campus of Western Kentucky University. Our meetings are always open to the public. Members please bring a friend or two – new recruits are always welcome. Our Program for February 2017: Who is buried in Lovell Harrison Rousseau’s grave? At Cave Hill Cemetery in Louisville, Kentucky, at the head of the thousands of graves of Union soldiers, is a monument to Lovell H. -
![CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/8733/chairmen-of-senate-standing-committees-table-5-3-1789-present-978733.webp)
CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy. -
Episode 110: Burnside Moves Toward Fredericksburg Http
Episode 110: Burnside Moves Toward Fredericksburg http://civilwar150.longwood.edu Upon hearing that George McClellan had been removed as head of the Army of the Potomac and replaced by Ambrose Burnside, Robert E Lee’s reaction was somewhat humorous but ultimately prophetic. Lee remarked that he was sad to see McClellan go, “for we always understood each other so well. I fear they may continue to make these changes until they find someone whom I don’t understand.” Abraham Lincoln would eventually find such a man in Ulysses S. Grant. As for Burnside, he was reluctant to take the reins of the Army of the Potomac and the events of the next month would show that Lee had little trouble understanding him. When Burnside took over command, the Union army was at Warrenton while Lee’s army was about 30 miles away at Culpeper. The two forces were separated by the Rappahannock River. Since Lincoln had been frustrated by McClellan’s lack of aggression, he pressed Burnside to do something and soon. On November 14, 1862, only five days after assuming command, Burnside presented his plan to Lincoln. His plan called for the Union army to move 40 miles east to Fredericksburg and cross the Rappahannock there. Having sidestepped the mass of the Confederates, Burnside’s troops would then move south and capture the Confederate capitol at Richmond. Lincoln liked the plan and approved it. When McClellan had moved on Richmond earlier in the year, he had moved most of his men south by boat to Fortress Monroe. This had left Washington, D.C.