DOCSLIB.ORG

Juicio a Michael Jackson - 31 De Enero - 13 De Junio -2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juicio a Michael Jackson - 31 De Enero - 13 De Junio -2005 JUICIO A MICHAEL JACKSON - 31 DE ENERO - 13 DE JUNIO -2005 JUICIO A MICHAEL JACKSON 31 DE ENERO - 13 DE JUNIO - 2005 VEREDICTO UNÁNIME INOCENTE JUEZ: ACUSACION: DEFENSA: RODNEY MELVILLE TOM SNEDDON THOMAS MESEREAU RON ZONEN ROBERT SANGER GORDON SUSAN YU AUNCHINCLOSS BRIAN OXAM Por Mariana Riva Bs.As, Argentina. 1 JUICIO A MICHAEL JACKSON - 31 DE ENERO - 13 DE JUNIO -2005 INDICE JUICIO A MICHAEL JACKSON ...........................................................................................................................1 INDICE..................................................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCCIÓN..................................................................................................................................................6 INFORMACION ANTES DEL COMIENZO DEL JUICIO A MICHAEL JACKSON...............................................8 Breve reseña comparativa de ambos casos (Chandler y Arvizo) ...............................................................8 CASO CHANDLER (1993) ...................................................................................................................................9 GRABACION A EVAN CHANDLER EN DONDE CUENTA COMO QUIERE DESTRUIR A MICHAEL JACKSON...........................................................................................................................................................10 CASO ARVIZO (2003)........................................................................................................................................11 ¿QUIEN ES EL FISCAL TOM SNEDDON? .......................................................................................................12 Conducta del fiscal impropia......................................................................................................................12 LA FAMILIA ARVIZO..........................................................................................................................................13 En 1998 la familia demanda a la tienda JC Penney..................................................................................13 Fraude monetario: Cuando el joven que acusa al Sr. Jackson y sus padres pidieron ayuda monetaria. 13 Corrupción de la fiscalía y su relación con el juez del caso Arvizo (Juicio 2005) .....................................14 Engaña madre de acusador de Jackson a revista ....................................................................................16 Comunicado de Thomas Mesereau sobre declaraciones filtradas ...........................................................17 Juez Melville quiere que siga llamándose "víctimas" a acusadores de Michael.......................................18 La secretaria de un ex-abogado de los Arvizo testificará contra ellos ......................................................19 Discusión sobre 21 mociones.............................................................................................................................20 El equipo de abogados de Michael Jackson en el Caso Arvizo cuenta a partir de ahora con un nuevo miembro: Gary Dunlap...............................................................................................................................21 GERALDO RIVERA HABLA DE MICHAEL........................................................................................................22 El niño que acusó a Michael Jackson: ¿víctima del cantante o de su familia?.........................................23 Dónde fue a parar el dinero de The Laugh Factory?.................................................................................24 "George López y Chris Tucker son dos de los humoristas más brillantes, pero ahora parece que éstos divertidos hombres podrían haber sido utilizados en una estafa relacionada con la familia del chico que acusa a Michael Jackson...........................................................................................................................24 Detalles informativos para entender más sobre éste caso ................................................................................25 Citación a empleados de Neverland..........................................................................................................26 Sneddon intimida a una familia y a un sobrino de Michael Jackson .........................................................27 "Una revista para adultos que tiene la fiscalía como prueba, puede estar contaminada" ........................28 La madre de acusador de Jackson engaña otra vez a un periódico para pedir dinero ............................29 LA FAMILIA QUE ACUSA A JACKSON DICE HABER SIDO SECUESTRADA POR EL CANTANTE. PERO LA FAMILIA EN ESE TIEMPO FUE VISTA EN RESTAURANTES, HACIENDO COMPRAS Y HASTA EN EL CINE..................................................................................................................................30 La investigación contra Michael Jackson sigue apostando por la corrupción...........................................32 El tribunal ocultaba hasta ahora un documento de la defensa relacionado con Davelyn Arvizo (hermana mayor del menor que acusa a Jackson)....................................................................................................34 Los chicos Arvizo de compras con el fiscal Sneddon................................................................................36 PRIMER DIA DE SELECCION DEL JURADO...................................................................................................37 Selección del jurado: Las mujeres más comprensivas y sinceras ............................................................38 Febrero de 2005 ........................................................................................................................................39 Segunda audiencia para la Elección de Jurado ........................................................................................39 Tercera audiencia para la Elección de Jurado ..........................................................................................40 Febrero de 2005 ........................................................................................................................................41 Cuarta audiencia para la Elección de Jurado *CANCELADA*..................................................................41 Cuarta audiencia para la Elección de Jurado............................................................................................42 Quinta audiencia para la Elección del Jurado ...........................................................................................43 Sexta audiencia para la Elección de Jurado .............................................................................................44 QUIENES SON LOS DOCE INTEGRANTES DEL JURADO. ...........................................................................45 ARGUMENTOS INICIALES DE LA DEFENSA..................................................................................................47 TESTIGOS DE LA ACUSACION........................................................................................................................48 DECLARACION DE MARTIN BASHIR......................................................................................................48 DECLARACION DE ANN GABRIEL..........................................................................................................49 DECLARACION DE DAVELYN ARVIZO Y VIDEO ALABANZA A MICHAEL JACKSON ........................51 DECLARACION DE STAR ARVIZO..........................................................................................................53 DECLARACION DE GAVIN ARVIZO ........................................................................................................57 DECLARACION DE INVESTIGADORES DEL DEPARTAMENTO DEL SHERRIFF DE SANTA BARBARA: TERRY SLAA, JEFF KLAPAKIS Y STEVE ROBELL ............................................................60 DECLARACION DEL SHERIFF VICTOR ALVAREZ Y EL DETECTIVE PAUL ZELIS.............................62 2 JUICIO A MICHAEL JACKSON - 31 DE ENERO - 13 DE JUNIO -2005 DECLARACION DE KIKI FOURNIER .......................................................................................................63 DECLARACION DEL SGT. CONN ABEL, UNA AZAFATA DE XTRAJET Y LOUISE PALANKER .........64 DECLARACION DE LOUISE PALANKER ................................................................................................65 DECLARACION DE ROBERT CHARLES COOLEY Y CRAIG BONNER ...............................................66 DECLARACION DEL DR. ANTONIO CANTU Y LA FORENSE LISA ROOT HEMMAN..........................67 DECLARACION DEL SGTO. ROBERT SPINNER ...................................................................................68 MOCION PARA LA INCLUSION DE EVIDENCIAS PASADAS. ...............................................................69 DECLARACION DE LA AZAFATA CYNTHIA BELL .................................................................................70 DECLARACION DEL PSIQUIATRA STAN KATZ .....................................................................................71 DECLARACION DEL EX ABOGADO DE LOS CHANDLER Y ARVIZO; LARRY FELDMAN ..................72 DECLARACION DE JASON FRANCIA.....................................................................................................73 DECLARACION DE BLANCA FRANCIA...................................................................................................74
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 1993 Allegations
    The Michael Jackson Allegations The Michael Jackson Allegations An extensive discussion of the 1993 Chandler/Francia allegations, the 2005 Arvizo trial, and a FAQ section v2.1. A PDF version of the website https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/ 1 The Michael Jackson Allegations Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................. 3 The 1993 Allegations ...................................................................................... 4 Key players .......................................................................................................................... 5 The Timeline ....................................................................................................................... 6 Michael Jackson’s first accuser – meet the Chandler family! ........................................... 20 Evan Chandler’s “Suspicions” .......................................................................................... 26 Taped phone conversations between Evan Chandler and David Schwartz....................... 36 How Did The Allegations of the Chandlers Emerge? ....................................................... 79 The Use of Sodium Amytal? ............................................................................................. 84 The Chandlers’ Monetary Demands ................................................................................. 87 The Chandler Allegations .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving Neverland"
    FACTS TO CONSIDER WHEN WATCHING "LEAVING NEVERLAND" After seeing Leaving Neverland, I thought Michael Jackson lucked out during his lifetime for not having been convicted of child sexual abuse. I wanted to know how he lucked out, so I started reading. Gradually, I came across one surprise after another. The following article is a result of those surprises. Two cases of child sexual abuse were brought against Michael Jackson during his lifetime (the 1993 Chandler case and the 2005 Arvizo case). These cases turned out to be not credible, to say the least. When asked about those who doubted the "not guilty" verdicts of the 2005 criminal trial, the jury replied, "They didn't see what we saw." (from a truly enlightening Huffington Post article by awarded investigative journalist Charles Thomson on the 2005 trial and media coverage – see below for more). Suddenly, in the years after Michael Jackson's death, two other cases of child sexual abuse are brought against the late Michael Jackson. Already these cases contain blatant and proven lies. The question is whether these cases are credible enough on other counts. They better be, because it is one thing to bring charges of child molestation against a living person that, among other things, contain proven false plots to secure monetary compensations; it is another thing to bring those horrible charges against someone who can no longer defend himself. The fact that the case of Robson/Safechuck is partly built on the previous two cases (including some of its "witnesses") is but one element that raises credibility issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Jackson Fiktion Vs. Fakten
    Michael Jackson Fiktion vs. Fakten Die 7 übelsten Gerüchte unter die Lupe genommen “Lies run sprints, but the truth runs marathons.” Michael Jackson 1. Michael Jackson verleugnete seine afroamerikanische Herkunft und hat sich deswegen die Haut bleichen lassen. Zeit seines Lebens ist Jackson das Opfer einer sensationslüsternen und teilweise rassistischen Berichterstattung gewesen. So wurde unter anderem das Gerücht in die Welt gesetzt, dass er sich die Haut bleichen lassen habe, weil er seine afroamerikanische Herkunft verleugne. Dabei litt Jackson an der Hautkrankheit Vitiligo. Die Krankheit tritt ungefähr bei einem Prozent der Bevölkerung auf und ist bei dunkelhäutigen Personen durch die weißen Flecken besonders auffällig. Meist beginnt die Zerstörung der Pigmente an Händen und Armbeugen. Bei einem geringeren Anteil der Patienten breiten sich die weißen Flecken im Laufe der Jahre über den gesamten Körper inklusive Gesicht und sogar Lippen aus. Schon im Kindesalter macht sich die Vitiligo an Jacksons Fingern bemerkbar und breitet sich fortlaufend an den Händen aus. Die hellen Flecken sind Anfang und Mitte der 80er Jahre bereits deutlich zu erkennen. 2 Jackson hat lange Zeit versucht, die weißen Flecken dunkel zu überschminken. Hierfür verwendete er bei öffentlichen Auftritten ein Camouflage-Make-up, das auf sichtbare Hautstellen an Händen, Armen, Hals und Gesicht aufgetragen wurde. Später mussten sein Hautarzt und er schweren Herzens die Entscheidung treffen, die wenigen verbliebenen Pigmente an Gesicht und Händen mit Salben aufzuhellen und optisch anzugleichen. Obwohl sich Jackson 1993 im Interview mit Oprah Winfrey öffentlich zu seiner Krankheit bekannte, berichten die Medien weiterhin von vermeintlichen Hautbleichungen. (siehe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHJUbVF1Vsg und https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qatgvKFkQo ) 1989 mit hellem Make-up bei den American Music Awards (links), daneben im selben Jahr beim Videodreh zu „Liberian Girl“ noch mit dunklerem Make-up “Maybe I look at the world through rose colored glasses but I love people all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Jackson Housekeeper Testimony Ieee
    Michael Jackson Housekeeper Testimony negligible?Prankish and Veilless Assyrian and Arne ovarian disrobing Pablo herconfabbing sightlessness while campyveeps whene'erArchon dethroned or pize appropriately, her disposable is Enriqueelsewhither overjoysand clutters unremittently, usward. Stirling crosiered boats and his involved.unicorn hassles unbrokenly or connaturally after Clayton shedding and Wades mum was like jackson but he did bubbles to see my kids lives and sometimes Same attorney mark when it was unsure of testimony from third incident, where the shower. Halsey announces that i told the evidence that and this? Decide that kid number one of child sexual, you know what your area? Hated going to her testimony on at the documentary that went to back problem signing in the ga cookie value is her fingers and jimmy safechuck are your little. Something has had that michael testimony on abc news on all the young guests became more colorful guests free on them sleeping with elizabeth taylor and watch. Outside of meredith corporation all know about wade and sometimes with his emotional development was hospitalized, where the poo. Prosecution to trial of his life is that jackson but he said he do. Training camp not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Thousands of the former housekeeper testimony began to believe he throws them from gavin arvizo family were a hit. Surprising to work with conspiracy charge of his trousers and was unclear when i thought they were a boy. Historians know about her testimony began managing fighters, who enjoyed hours of like the place where they should his tours. Heart walks with kids walking around him of the behavior is seen the browser.
    [Show full text]
  • MJ Times II.Qxp
    The Times NEVERLAND VALLEY NEWS LOS OLIVOS 2005 - Vol.2 0,77 Neverland cent Full report on the Michael Jackson Trial What happened in the Michael Jackson trial so far? He was indicted on 10 felony counts for incidents that allegedly occurred in February and March 2003. He is accused of molest- ing a young boy, giving him alcohol and conspiring to hold the boy's fami- ly captive. You think Michael Jackson is guilty? Examine the nature of that claim. Are your sources credible? Conspiracy theory? Both the accuser and the defendant claim that they are the victims of a conspiracy. Who is right? This news- paper will give you an insight of the story other then the regular sensation- JUSTICE? seeking media. page 6 Santa Maria 2005 - What emerged from the trial so far is a portrait of a family from the wrong side of the tracks who managed to infiltrate the air of 1 MILLION X MJ Times!!! Hollywood's celebrity's. They approached celebrities such as Lopez, actor Jim Carrey, "Tonight Show" host Jay Leno and boxer Mike Tyson. Leno went to A Record breaking 1 million copies police, telling them "something was wrong" and that he suspected the family of the MJ Times vol.1 have been dis- was "looking for a mark". Some of the celebrities responded generously. tributed word-wide in different lan- Comic Louise Palanker reportedly gave the family $20,000. After the boy met guages!!! Read more on page 8 with Michael Jackson his cancer has gone into remission. When the family found out that they were not going to live at Neverland forever, realizing they were not going to get rich, that's when their story changed and the accusations began.
    [Show full text]
  • Evan Chandler's
    The Michael Jackson Allegations The Michael Jackson Allegations An extensive discussion of the 1993 Chandler/Francia allegations, the 2005 Arvizo trial, and a FAQ section v2.2. A PDF version of the website https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/ 1 The Michael Jackson Allegations Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................. 3 The 1993 Allegations ...................................................................................... 4 Key players .......................................................................................................................... 5 The Timeline ....................................................................................................................... 6 Michael Jackson’s first accuser – meet the Chandler family! ........................................... 20 Evan Chandler’s “Suspicions” .......................................................................................... 26 Taped phone conversations between Evan Chandler and David Schwartz....................... 36 How Did The Allegations of the Chandlers Emerge? ....................................................... 79 The Use of Sodium Amytal? ............................................................................................. 84 The Chandlers’ Monetary Demands ................................................................................. 87 The Chandler Allegations .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Thomson, Contributor Award-Winning Writer One of The
    Charles Thomson, Contributor Award-winning writer One of the Most Shameful Episodes In Journalistic History HUFFPOST 06/13/2010 Updated May 25, 2011 It was five years ago today that twelve jurors unanimously acquitted Michael Jackson on various charges of child molestation, conspiracy and providing alcohol to a minor. It is difficult to know how history will remember the Michael Jackson trial. Perhaps as the epitome of western celebrity obsession. Perhaps as a 21st century lynching. Personally, I think it will be remembered as one of the most shameful episodes in journalistic history. It's not until you find yourself digging through newspaper archives and re-watching hours of TV coverage that you truly understand the magnitude of the media's failings. It was industry- wide. No doubt, there were certain reporters and even certain publications and TV stations that overtly favored the prosecution, but many of the media's shortcomings were institutional. In a media obsessed with soundbites, how to you reduce eight hours of testimony into two sentences and remain accurate? In an era of rolling news and instant blogging, how do you resist the temptation to dash out of the courtroom at the earliest opportunity to break news of the latest salacious allegations, even if it means missing a slice of the day's testimony? Looking back on the Michael Jackson trial, I see a media out of control. The sheer amount of propaganda, bias, distortion and misinformation is almost beyond comprehension. Reading the court transcripts and comparing them to the newspaper cuttings, the trial that was relayed to us didn't even resemble the trial that was going on inside the courtroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Jackson As a Mythical Hero an Anthropological Perspective Redaktor Prowadzący Katarzyna Bielawska-Drzewek
    Aneta Ostaszewska - a sociologist, SON researcher and academic teacher (dr. habil.) ANETA OSTASZEWSKA working at the University of Warsaw. Founder and director of the Center for Women and Gender Research at the Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and Resocialization. Author of works in the field of auto / biography, feminism, women’s studies and sociology of culture, including two books devoted to the social career of Michael Jackson (2009, 2010). Michael Jackson The aim of this book is to investigate how traits of a mythical hero are manifested in MICHAEL JACKSON modern culture and, to be more precise, as a mythical hero in social beliefs about Michael Jackson. These beliefs are traces leading to complex levels of understanding the phenomenon An anthropological perspective of pop culture and its taboo. Pop culture makes up its own mythologies and creates its own heroes, but it does so with a reference to the more complex cultural wholeness. This book is an attempt to follow these references and reflect on them. MICHAEL JACK ANETA OSTASZEWSKA - www.wuw.pl Michael Jackson.indd 3 10/12/20 14:21 Michael Jackson ANETA OSTASZEWSKA Michael Jackson as a mythical hero An anthropological perspective Redaktor prowadzący Katarzyna Bielawska-Drzewek Redakcja Bożena Lesiuk Tłumaczenie na język angielski Joanna Zahorska Korekta Magdalena Orczykowska Indeks Aneta Ostaszewska Projekt okładki i stron tytułowych Anna Gogolewska Ilustracja na okładce wpap/shutterstock Skład i łamanie Beata Stelęgowska Publikacja dofinansowana przez Uniwersytet Warszawski © Copyright by Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2021 Aneta Ostaszewska ORCID 0000-0002-3220-3289 ISBN 978-83-235-4808-9 (druk) ISBN 978-83-235-4816-4 (pdf online) ISBN 978-83-235-4824-9 (e-pub) ISBN 978-83-235-4832-4 (mobi) Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 00-838 Warszawa, ul.
    [Show full text]
  • Ueli Meier Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Ueli Meier xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [email protected] Ombudsstelle SRG.D c/o SRG Deutschschweiz Fernsehstrasse 1-4 8052 Zürich xxxxxxxxx, 26. April 2019 Beanstandung zu „Leaving Neverland“, Ausstrahlung ab 6. April 2019, 21.15 Uhr Sehr geehrter Herr Blum, sehr geehrter Herr Pfiffner Ich wende mich an die Ombudsstelle, da durch die Programmaufnahme des Filmes „Leaving Neverland“ gegen das Sachgerechtigkeitsgebot und das Transparenzgebot verstossen wurde. (Es muss davon ausgegangen werden, dass einige Leute nur den Film selbst oder gewisse Werbetrailers gesehen haben. In den begleitenden Diskussionen – im „Club“ durfte ich teilnehmen – wurde der Wahrheitsgehalt des Filmes nicht vertieft diskutiert.) SRF beteiligt sich einerseits an der Verleumdung eines gesellschaftspolitisch bedeutenden Künstlers, und beteiligt sich andererseits aktiv an der Untergrabung des Vertrauens in die Medien – was losgelöst vom Thema Michael Jackson – langfristig auch für eine stabile Gesellschaft wie in der Schweiz gefährliche Folgen haben kann. Ich habe Verständnis dafür, dass sogar renommierte Journalisten die Schilderungen in „Leaving Neverland“ als glaubhaft einstufen. Nüchtern und mit dem notwendigen Hintergrundwissen betrachtet, ist die Glaubwürdigkeit der beiden Darsteller in „Leaving Neverland“ aber sehr zweifelhaft. Diverse Schilderungen im Film können nicht der Wahrheit entsprechen. (Teils nachweislich, teils gemäss Aussagen von mehreren Zeugen.) Wieso diese Behauptungen trotzdem in einer vierstündigen Doku erzählt werden,
    [Show full text]