DOCSLIB.ORG

Constitutional Compromises Date ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constitutional Compromises Date ______ Binder Page_____ Name____________________________________________________ Period _____________ Constitutional Compromises Date ___________________ Constitutional Compromises Our Constitution has been called a bundle of compromises. Why did the states send representatives to Philadelphia in 1787? To write a new constitution. Most people agreed that the ​ ​ .Articles of Confederation were not working, so they ​ ​ ​ had to replace it with a new plan for government. The states sent representatives, known as the delegates. They met in ​ ​ the very same room that the Declaration of Independence had been signed in. The meeting eventually came to be known as the Constitutional Convention. The person chosen ​ ​ to be president of the convention George Washington. Because the men were writing ​ ​ ​ the framework for a new government, the have come to be called the Framers of the ​ ​ ​ ​ Constitution. They are a big part of the group that we know as the Founding Fathers. ​ ​ The delegates needed to negotiate, compromise, and change their minds as needed, so they decided to meet in secret. Because of that, there is a lot that we don’t know about ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ what happened behind those closed doors. What is our best primary source for knowing what happened during those meetings?the diary of James Madison ​ A compromise is when both sides give up something in order to make an ​ ​ ​ ​ agreement and get something that they want. The story of the Constitutional Convention is a story of compromises being made. EACH OF THESE ISSUES WAS A POTENTIAL “DEAL BREAKER.” IF ANY OF THESE COMPROMISES WAS NOT REACHED, IT’S POSSIBLE THAT THE U.S. WOULD NOT HAVE CONTINUED. THE CONVENTION COULD HAVE BROKEN UP AND EACH OF THE STATES COULD HAVE CONTINUED AS A SEPARATE COUNTRY. The Great Compromise Also called the Connecticut Compromise The issue: How are states going to be represented in Congress? ​ ​ ​ Large states wanted representation Small states wanted all states to ​ to be based on population. have equal representation (All ​ ​ ​ ​ (The more people you have, the more votes states would get the same number of votes in you get.) Congress no matter how many people they had.) The Compromise: There will be two houses in Congress. ​ ​ In the Senate, each state will have two votes. ​ ​ ​ ​ In the other house (the House of Representatives), the ​ ​ number of votes states have will be based on their population. ​ ​ In order for Congress to make a law, it must be passed by both houses. Next problem- Since people now had to know the population of each state, how would the population be determined? Every 10 years, the federal government will be required to count ​ ​ the number of people in each state. This count is called the Census. The next one will take place in 2020. ​ ​ ​ The Three-Fifths Compromise The issue: Do slaves count as people? ​ ​ ​ Free states wanted: Slave states wanted: Slaves should NOT count for Slaves SHOULD count for representation (since they can’t representation, but they should not ​ ​ vote), but they should count for count for taxation. taxation. The Compromise: Each slave will count for ⅗ of a free person ​ ​ for both representation and taxation. In other words, 5 slaves = 3 free people. For every 5,000 slaves in the population, only 3,000 will count. Compromise on the Slave Trade The issue: Will slaves be allowed to be imported into the slave states? ​ Free states wanted: Slave states wanted: The importation of slaves to end immediately. The importation of slaves to continue forever.They did not want Congress to have the power to end the importation of slaves. The Compromise: Congress would not be allowed to make any laws stopping the importing of slaves until 1808 (20 years down the road). Congress could put a tax the imported slaves. (Note: When 1808 finally arrived, the Congress did vote to end the importation of slaves.) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitutional Convention: Lesson Plan
    Constitutional Convention (Philadelphia 1787): The Birth of the Constitution- History of the United States Series | Academy 4 Social Change Constitutional Convention: Lesson Plan Topic The Constitutional Convention was a meeting of delegates from 12 out of the 13 states that was held in Philadelphia from May to September 1787. George Washington was elected president of the Convention, and other delegates included James Madison, Ben Franklin, and Alexander Hamilton. Though their original objective was only to amend the Articles of Confederation, the delegates quickly decided to draft an entirely new document instead. This new Constituti on outlined a federalist form of government with a bicameral legislature, three distinct branches, and a comprehensive system of checks and balances. Possible subjects/classes Time needed ● Government ● History 45 - 60 min ● Politics Video link: https://academy4sc.org/topic/constitutional-convention-the-birth-of-the-constituti on/ Objective: What will students know/be able to do at the end of class? Students will be able to... ● Explain why the Constitutional Convention happened. ● Describe some of the main debates during the Convention, and provide the arguments of each side. ● Explain the lasting impact of the decisions made at the Constitutional Convention. Key Concepts & Vocabulary American Revolutionary War, Delegates, separation of powers, ratification Materials Needed Worksheet, Student Internet Access (Optional) Constitutional Convention (Philadelphia 1787): The Birth of the Constitution- History of the United States Series | Academy 4 Social Change Before you watch Quick write: Ask students to make a list of words and phrases that come to mind when they are asked about the Constitution (responses may include “Founding Fathers,” “amendments,” etc).
    [Show full text]
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise 2.7
    The Three-Fifths Compromise 2.7 The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes. The issue was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years, and to determine what percentage of the nation's direct tax burden the state would have to bear. The compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman. The Convention had unanimously accepted the principle that representation in the House of Representatives would be in proportion to the relative state populations. However, since slaves could not vote, non-slaves in slave states would thus have the benefit of increased representation in the House and the Electoral College. Delegates opposed to slavery proposed that only free inhabitants of each state be counted for apportionment purposes, while delegates supportive of slavery, on the other hand, opposed the proposal, wanting slaves to count in their actual numbers. A compromise which was finally agreed upon—of counting "all other persons" as only three-fifths of their actual numbers—reduced the representation of the slave states relative to the original proposals, but improved it over the Northern position.[1] An inducement for slave states to accept the Compromise was its tie to taxation in the same ratio, so that the burden of taxation on the slave states was also reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law – Laws Must Be Made for Everyone, No One Is Above the A
    Rule of Law – laws must be made for everyone, no one is above the law Amendment – Change to the Constitution, formal = written change, Informal = implied changes Special Session – Calling congress together in an emergency Article – One of the seven sections of the constitution Continuous Body – The Senate because 2/3 of the senators are not running for reelection Impeach – charge a federal official with a crime Bureaucrat – someone who works in a large organization Libel – writing an untruth about someone that causes them harm Slander – saying an untruth about someone that causes them harm Extradition – sending an accused person back to the state where they are accused of committing a crime or where they have been sentenced Filibuster – trying to talk a bill to death, unlimited debate Cloture – stopping debate, shutting down a filibuster Joint resolution – a motion by both houses of congress to declare war, amend the constitution etc. 1. Constitutional Principles a. Federalism – division of power between national and local/state governments b. Separation of powers – creates branches of government c. Checks and balances – each branch has limited control over the others d. Limited Government – government can only do what society says it can e. Popular sovereignty – people are the power of the government f. Judicial Review – the courts decide whether acts of government are allowed by the constitution 2. Three ways power is distributed a. Unitary – all power of government comes from one location b. Confederate – independent states/countries come together for a common purpose while keeping their independence c. Federal – sharing of power between local/state government and a national government 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Sherman, Oliver Ellsworth, and the Formation of America's Constitutional Order (Chapter Five of Great Christian Jurists in American History)
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Department of History, Department of History, Politics, and Politics, and International Studies International Studies 2019 Roger Sherman, Oliver Ellsworth, and the Formation of America's Constitutional Order (Chapter Five of Great Christian Jurists in American History) Mark David Hall Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/hist_fac Part of the American Politics Commons, Christianity Commons, and the History Commons 5 Roger Sherman, Oliver Ellsworth, and the Formation of America's Constitutional Order Mark David Hall In 1822, former President John Adams wrote to the biographer John Sanderson that Roger Sherman was "one of the most cordial friends which I ever had in my life. Destitute of all literary and scientific education, but such as he acquired by his own exertions, he was one of the most sensible men in the world. The clearest head and steadiest heart. It is praise enough to say that the late Chief Justice Ellsworth told me that he had made Mr. Sherman his model in his youth .... [He] was one of the soundest and strongest pillars of the revolution."' Among the important participant~ in the War for Independence, the Constitutional Convention, and the First Federal Congress, few had as much influence on the creation of America's constitutional order as Sherman and Ellsworth. And none of the more famous founders regularly referenced by students of the era represent as well the 5o-75 percent of Americans in this era who were Calvinists. 2 BIOGRAPHIES Sherman was born in Massachusetts in 1721 to Mehetabel and William Sherman.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2004 No. 53 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the we look forward to this opportunity The Reverend Ronald J. Nuzzi, Direc- United States of America, and to the Repub- every year when we have this chance to tor, ACE Leadership Program, Univer- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, visit with you and catch up on each sity of Notre Dame, offered the fol- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. other’s lives. lowing prayer: f Every one of you has spent precious In every age, O Lord, You have been WARM WELCOME FOR THE years of your life, some of the best our refuge. So we seek Your wisdom REVEREND RONALD J. NUZZI years of your life, working to represent that justice may flow from our deeds. (Mr. RYAN of Ohio asked and was the needs and concerns of the Amer- Bless the work of our hands this day. ican people right here in this Chamber. By the power of Your outstretched given permission to address the House arm, open our eyes to see the needs of for 1 minute and to revise and extend Your commitment to your Nation did all who suffer, our ears to hear the cry his remarks.) not end when you left the halls of Con- of the poor, our hearts to feel the an- Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional Convention Philadelphia, 1787
    The Constitutional Convention Philadelphia, 1787 Federalist versus Anti-Federalist: The Debate over the Bill of Rights Conflict Between Large States and Small States SMALL states thought U.S. should have the same number of representatives (equal representation) They put forth the New Jersey Plan, which called for one house of Congress, with each state getting one vote Conflict Between Large States and Small States LARGE states argued that if a state had more people, it should have more representatives in Congress (proportional representation) James Madison put forth the Virginia Plan, which called for two houses of Congress (both based on population) The Great Compromise A special committee was formed. Their solution, suggested by Benjamin Franklin, became known as the Great Compromise. (also called the Connecticut Compromise). The compromise passed by only 1 vote. 3 Parts of the Great Compromise 1. Congress would have 2 houses – the Senate and the House of Representatives. 2. The House of Representatives would be elected on the basis of proportional representation (population). 3. The Senate would be elected on the basis of equal representation. Conflict Between Northern States and Southern States The Southern states used slave labor. The Northern states used mainly free labor and was a center for trade with other nations. Both sides disagreed on protective tariffs (taxes on products imported from other nations which increase their cost) and slavery. The Three-Fifths Compromise Compromise-Each side gives up something in return for something it wanted. In exchange for allowing Congress the power to control trade, Northerners compromised on the question of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Relations
    Formation of a New Government, abt.1781 to 1789 Influences upon the development of a governing structure: Rhode Island Financial Crisis, 1786 Albany Plan of Union 1754 ➢ Farmers controlled state government. In an effort to address their cash-strapped At the outbreak of the French and Indian War, representatives of the northern status and pay their debts owed to wealthy merchants, they authorize the colonies and the Six Iroquois Nations met in Albany; there were several plans by unlimited printing of new money; this causes inflation, as the debt was which to centralize a colonial government for the main purpose of defense. artificially devalued. Creditors try to avoid being repaid, hoping for the market Benjamin Franklin’s plan was supported by Thomas Hutchinson. It allowed for… to stabilize first; Rhode Island courts rule it to be a crime for creditor to refuse ➢ A President-General appointed by the King of England repayment by a debtor, punishable by 2 years imprisonment. ➢ A Grand Council to be chosen by representatives of the Colonial Assemblies Maryland and Virginia Tensions, 1787 ➢ Issues of finance, dealing with native tribes, control of commerce and defense. ➢ Civilians on both sides of a common river take shots at one another The plan is formulated and distributed to Colonial Assemblies and London. All Annapolis Convention, 1786 reject it. Why? ➢ Delegates from five states met to discuss how to improve commerce/trade. (all ➢ (London) disliked the idea of consolidating more power in colonial hands; were invited, but only five showed up; five failed to attend and the other three preferred to encourage reliance on England.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of American Government Section 4 Objectives
    Chapter 2: Origins of American Government Section 4 Objectives 1. Identify the Framers of the Constitution and discuss how they organized the Philadelphia Convention. 2. Compare and contrast the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. 3. Summarize the convention’s major compromises and the effects of those decisions. 4. Describe the delegates’ reactions to the Constitution. Chapter 2, Section 4 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 2 Key Terms • Framers : the individuals who attended the Philadelphia Convention • Virginia Plan : a plan offered at the Convention that called for a central government with three branches, with each state’s representation in a bicameral legislature based mainly on population • New Jersey Plan : a plan calling for a central government with a unicameral legislature and equal representation of all the states. Chapter 2, Section 4 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 3 Key Terms, cont. • Connecticut Compromise : an agreement to divide Congress into two houses, one with representation based on state population and one with equal representation for all states • Three-Fifths Compromise : an agreement to count each slave as three fifths of a person when determining state population • Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise : an agreement forbidding Congress from taxing state exports or interfering with the slave trade for at least 20 years Chapter 2, Section 4 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 4 Introduction • What compromises enabled the Framers to create the Constitution? – The Connecticut Compromise • This compromise dealt with how to determine the representation of states in the national legislature. – The Three-Fifths Compromise • This compromise dealt with issues arising from slavery. – The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise • This compromise addressed northern and southern disagreements about foreign trade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Test Clause: a Fictitious Discussion (Pdf)
    Fictional Debate between William Williams, Elihu and Guests at the Griswold Inn in Essex Connecticut in February of 1788 John Franco Waukegan High School Waukegan, Illinois Introduction After the Federal Constitution was written and adopted by the Constitutional delegates at the Philadelphia Convention during the summer of 1787, the Congress sent the document to the states. Each of the thirteen states held a convention where the delegates were assigned the task of debating and ultimately voting for or against the ratification of the Constitution. Nine out of the thirteen states needed to ratify the new Constitution before it could take effect. The first state was Delaware in December of 1787. Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Georgia followed in quick succession. Connecticut was the fifth state to ratify the Constitution in January of 1788. New Hampshire would be the decisive ninth state in June of 1788 and Rhode Island would be the last in May of 1790 well after the election of George Washington as our first president. In this fictional debate several of the delegates of both the Federal Constitutional Convention and the State Convention meet in an actual colonial pub in February of 1788 a month after Connecticut becomes the fifth state to ratify the Constitution. In this hypothetical scenario William Williams (Connecticut State delegate from Lebanon, Connecticut and one of the original signers to the declaration of Independence) meets with Elihu (a pen name for an individual who has criticized him in the American Mercury (a local newspaper) for being a signatory of the Federal Constitution at the State Convention the month before.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    The Declaration of Independence: About the Signers (Continued) The Signers of the Declaration of Independence All of the colonies were represented in Philadelphia to consider the delicate case for independence and to change the course of the war. In all, there were fifty-six representatives from the thirteen colonies. Fourteen represented the New England Colonies, twenty-one represented the Middle Colonies and twenty-one represented the South- ern Colonies. The largest number (9) came from Pennsylvania. Most of the signers were American born although eight were foreign born. The ages of the signers ranged from 26 (Edward Rutledge) to 70 (Benjamin Franklin), but the majority of the signers were in their thirties or forties. More than half of the signers were lawyers and the others were planters, merchants and shippers. Together they mutually pledged “to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” They were mostly men of means who had much to lose if the war was lost. None of the sign- ers died at the hands of the British, and one-third served as militia officers during the war. Four of the signers were taken captive during the war and nearly all of them were poorer at the end of the war than at the beginning. No matter what each of these men did after July 1776, the actual signing of the Declaration of Independence which began on August 2 ensured them instant immortality. The following gives a bit of information about each signer AFTER the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Connecticut Samuel Huntington (1731-1796)—Samuel Huntington was a self-made man who distinguished himself in government on the state and national levels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twenty-Seventh Amendment in Its Constitutional Context: Amendments and the Amending Process
    The Twenty-seventh Amendment in its Constitutional Context: Amendments and the Amending Process An Honors Thesis (HONRS 499) by Andrea K.R. Schuldt Thesis Advisor: Dr. Ralph Baker - Ball State University Muncie, Indiana December, 1992 December 20, 1992 ~C(1) T'1e.S,; \...0 fP47/f 1~4 Iqq..< Purpose of Thesis - .53? This composition offers a description of the newest amendment to our Constitution within the context of the evolution of the entire document. A brief discussion of the 1787 Constitutional Convention is followed by an account of the origin of the Bill of Rights. A subsequent section offers a brief synopsis of the development of each amendment from the Eleventh to the Twenty-sixth. An explanation is then given of the political processes involved in amending the Constitution. The discourse concludes with a detailed focus on the development of the Twenty-seventh Amendment, beginning with its conception during the birth of the Bill of Rights, to its ratification 203 years later in 1992. -- - - Many Americans realize the importance of our Constitution and know that it is indeed the supreme law of the land, yet few understand fully its origins and its pervasiveness even in today's government. It is nonetheless a source of national focus and pride. Patterson states, "the Constitution has come to be revered by Americans; it has even become a national icon" (53). Our Constitution is not, however, a static document of policy. It serves as our guide for every governmental operation and is ever-changing. From its first state ratification in 1787 and through each subsequent ratification, a Bill of Rights (ratified in 1791), and seventeen other amendments (the most recent ratified in 1992), our Constitution remains the document that each President and Supreme Court justice must swear to defend and the code by which each American lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Project Helper
    Connecticut Project Helper Resources for Creating a Great Connecticut Project From the Connecticut Colonial Robin and ConneCT Kids! Connecticut State Symbols Famous Connecticut People Connecticut Information and Facts Famous Connecticut Places Connecticut Outline Map Do-it-Yourself Connecticut Flag Six Connecticut Project Ideas Connecticut Postcard and more…. www.kids.ct.gov What Makes a Great Connecticut Project? You! You and your ability to show how much you have learned about Connecticut. So, the most important part of your project will not be found in this booklet. But, we can help to give you ideas, resources, facts, and information that would be hard for you to find. Some students are good at drawing and art, some students are good at writing reports, and some students are good at crafts and other skills. But that part of the project will be only the beginning. A great Connecticut Project will be the one where you have become a Connecticut expert to the best of your abilities. Every State in the United States has a special character that comes from a unique blend of land, people, climate, location, history, industry, government, economy and culture. A great Connecticut Project will be the one where you can answer the question: "What makes Connecticut special?" In addition to this booklet, you should look for Connecticut information in your school library or town library. There are many online resources that can be found by doing internet searches. The more you find, the easier it will be to put together that Great Connecticut Project! The Connecticut Project Helper is produced and distributed by The ConneCT Kids Committee, and is intended for educational purposes only.
    [Show full text]