Report on Northern Mariana Islands Workforce Act of 2018, U.S. Public
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CNMI Workers' Compensation Program Was Created by the Enactment of Senate Bill 6-54 Into Public Law 6-33, the CNMI Workers' Compensation Law
What You Need To Know About The CNMI Workers’ Compensation Program A Handbook For, Employers, Carriers and Employees Department of Commerce Workers’ Compensation Commission Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands About This Handbook This handbook is prepared to highlight some of the major provisions of the Workers' Compensation law, rules and regulations and to provide the users pertinent information and answers. Since this handbook provides only highlights which may not fully explain the law, it is strongly recommended that you read the law, coded under Title 4, Division 9, Chapter 3, of the Commonwealth Code. The handbook is divided into seven (7) major sections: 1) The Brief Information section which defines the purpose of the program. 2) Employer/Carrier section which covers essential information for the employer and carrier. 3) The Employee section provides the highlights regarding employee's right and responsibilities and the type of benefits. 4) The Claims procedure section discusses the how to obtain benefits for job related injury, illness or death. 5) The Adjudication section describes the settlement of disputes. 6) The Notices section describes the various forms used and deadlines. 7) Penalties section describes the penalties for violation of law. Employees are encouraged to discuss their responsibilities fully with supervisors to avoid the likelihood of missing deadlines and reports and consequently benefits. Remember, it is your responsibility to prove that your injury is work-related. For more information, please contact the Department of Commerce Workers' Compensation Office nearest you: Saipan: Tinian Rota Department of Commerce Department of Commerce Department of Commerce Workers’ Compensation Commission Workers’ Compensation Commission Workers’ Compensation Commission P.O. -
Chapter 8. Land and Submerged Lands Use
Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) CHAPTER 8. LAND AND SUBMERGED LANDS USE 8.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 8.1.1 Definition of Resource This chapter describes and analyzes impacts of the proposed action on land and submerged lands ownership and management, and land and submerged lands use. Submerged lands refer to coastal waters extending from the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) coastline into the ocean 3 nautical miles (nm) (5.6 kilometers [km]), the limit of state or territorial jurisdiction. Land use discussions for this Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) include civilian and military existing and planned land uses, and land use planning guidance that directs future development. With respect to land ownership on Tinian, fee interest ownership is the primary means of private land ownership; leases or easements may also be used for land transfer or management purposes. On Tinian, the Department of Defense (DoD) leases approximately two-thirds of the total island area, exerting a notable influence upon Tinian land use. This chapter is organized to first look at existing conditions, then impacts are identified by alternatives and components. The chapter concludes with identification and discussion of potential mitigation measures that apply to significant impacts. The region of influence (ROI) for land use is land and submerged lands of Tinian. The proposed action is limited to Tinian; therefore, the emphasis is on Tinian with background information provided on CNMI. 8.1.2 Tinian Article XI and XII of the CNMI Constitution states that public lands collectively belong to the people of the Commonwealth who are of Northern Marianas decent. -
Fruit Bats Comprised of Only a Few Individuals, Also Previously Located by the Micronesian Megapode Team, Was Confirmed from the Helicopter Search of SA Col
Population Assessment of the Mariana Fruit Bat (Pteropus mariannus mariannus) on Anatahan, Sarigan, Guguan, Alamagan, Pagan, Agrihan, Asuncion, and Maug; 15 June – 10 July 2010 Administrative Report Pteropus mariannus mariannus at a roost on Pagan, Photograph by E. W. Valdez Ernest W. Valdez U. S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center, Arid Lands Field Station Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Administrative Reports are considered to be unpublished and may not be cited or quoted except in follow-up administrative reports to the same Federal agency or unless the agency releases the report to the public. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 METHODS AND MATERIALS ....................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 SARIGAN (15–16 June 2010) .................................................................................................................... 7 GUGUAN (17–18 June 2010) ..................................................................................................................... 7 ALAMAGAN (19–21 June 2010; 10 July 2010) -
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Coastal Resilience Assessment
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COASTAL RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT 20202020 Greg Dobson, Ian Johnson, Kim Rhodes UNC Asheville’s NEMAC Kristen Byler National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Bridget Lussier Lynker, on contract to NOAA Office for Coastal Management IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER: This report represents a Regional Coastal Resilience Assessment that can be used to identify places on the landscape for resilience-building efforts and conservation actions through understanding coastal flood threats, the exposure of populations and infrastructure have to those threats, and the presence of suitable fish and wildlife habitat. As with all remotely sensed or publicly available data, all features should be verified with a site visit, as the locations of suitable landscapes or areas containing flood threats and community assets are approximate. The data, maps, and analysis provided should be used only as a screening-level resource to support management decisions. This report should be used strictly as a planning reference tool and not for permitting or other legal purposes. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government, or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s partners. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation or its funding sources. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DISCLAIMER: The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce. -
Vegetation Mapping of the Mariana Islands: Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and Territory of Guam
VEGETATION MAPPING OF THE MARIANA ISLANDS: COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS AND TERRITORY OF GUAM NOVEMBER 2017 FINAL REPORT FRED AMIDON, MARK METEVIER1 , AND STEPHEN E. MILLER PACIFIC ISLAND FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, HONOLULU, HI 1 CURRENT AGENCY: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, MEDFORD, OR Photograph of Alamagan by Curt Kessler, USFWS. Mariana Island Vegetation Mapping Final Report November 2017 CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Description of Project Area ........................................................................................................................................... -
Disability Resource Directory
CNMI DISABILITY COMMUNITY INTRODUCTION Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you and your needs. We want you to know that you are appreciated and that any contributions you make to our community is valued. Our successes in the CNMI could not be possible without collaboration and contributions of individuals with disabilities and your freedom to express your wants, needs, and expectations. We, the CNMI Disabilities Network Partners (DNP), have worked hard to put this Resource Directory out to our people in the CNMI. Many groups were involved in putting this together including The Oce of Vocational Rehabilitation (OVR), The Ayuda Network, The State Independent Living Council (SILC), The Center for Living Independently (CLI), The Independent Living Group (ILG), The Trankilu Alternative Financing Program (TAFP), The Assistive Technology Program, The Commonwealth Oce of Transit Authority (COTA), The VOICES of the CNMI, and The CNMI Tri-Agencies made up of The CNMI Council on Developmental Disabilities (CDD), The University Center for Excellence on Developmental Disabilities (UCEDD), and The Northern Marianas Protection & Advocacy Systems, Inc. (NMPASI). The level of collaboration amongst our agencies is at an all time high. We hope to continue this level of teamwork to help bring awareness of disabilities, and issues surrounding disabilities to our people of the commonwealth. This resource directory is testimony to this fact. The information compiled here was the result of many peoples’ eorts. Please contact us if you nd anything you want to report about this resource directory to make it better for our next release. From all of us, thank you for taking a copy, and please share this information with your friends and family. -
Invertebrates Recorded from the Northern
MARIANA ISLANDS BIODIVERSITY. Short-horn grasshoppers Phylum: Arthropoda Class: Insecta Order: Orthoptera Suborder: Caelifera Superfamilies: Tetrigoidea and Acridoidea. Diversity Micronesia – 23 species, Mariana Isl. – 10 species, CNMI - 9 species Ecological and human significance Short-horn grasshoppers are herbivores usually living in open grassy or weedy areas. Although they have been implicated in crop damage, such as maize, severe damage usually occurs only when there is a buildup of numbers, such as that occurring sometimes with the locust (Locusta migratoria). It is unlikely that any of the grasshoppers are indigenous to the Northern Mariana Islands as they are dwellers of open grassland or of, at least, low-cover, open areas. It is probable that most of the islands were mostly covered by forest prior to the advent and influence of man. It does seem that Stenocatantops splendens has recently entered the Northern Marianas, as , although it is now common on Saipan, there were no records prior to the recent (2000) collected material. It is a moderately sized animal and unlikely to be missed by collectors. Heteropternis obscurella seems, similarly, to have recently colonised the CNMI although its presence on Sarigan indicates a longer occupation period. Both species are in the University of Guam collection but were not recorded by Kevan et al 1997 from the Marianas. Conservation There are no conservation issues recognised at present, and none can really be determined until a thorough survey of the areas has been undertaken. All remaining natural habitats need to be conserved as much as possible. Identification There are no keys for in house identification, specimens have been sent (2002) to Dr. -
Cruise Report (Pdf)
Submarine Ring of Fire 2003 – Mariana Arc R/V T. G. Thompson Cruise TN-153 February 9 - March 5, 2003 Guam to Guam Co-Chief Scientists Robert W. Embley Edward T. Baker Cruise Report Compiled by: Susan Merle, Robert Embley, Edward Baker and Bill Chadwick TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Submarine Ring of Fire 2003 Cruise Summary...............................................................…..............................1 2.0 Cruise Participants......................................................................................….......................................................6 2.1 Scientific Party and Affiliations...........................................................................................................................6 2.2 R/V Thomas G. Thompson Crew..........................................................................................................................7 3.0 Cruise Log..................................................................................................................…........................................8 4.0 Tables.......................................................................................................................…........................................15 4.1 Cruise Statistics............................................................................................................................................…...15 4.2 CTD Sample Type, Number, Description.........................................................................................................15 4.3 -
Volcanologic Investigations in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, May 1992
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VOLCANOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, MAY 1992 by Richard B. Moore 1, Robert Y. Koyanagi^, Maurice K. Sako^, Frank A. Trusdell^, Renee L. Ellorda^, and George Kojima^ U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-541 Prepared in cooperation with the Disaster Control Office, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. ipederal Center, MS 903, Denver, Colorado 80225 ^Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, Hawaii National Park, Hawaii 96718-0051 ABSTRACT U.S. Geological Survey volcanologists examined the ten volcanoes in the active Mariana Arc north of Saipan in May 1992, at the request of the Governor and the Disaster Control Office of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). A shallow earthquake swarm on Anatahan in March-April 1990 and reports of possible new fuming on Agrigan in August 1990 had prompted the evacuation of all CNMI islands north of Saipan. None of the volcanoes in the chain erupted during our visit. Five uninhabited islands (Farallon de Pajaros, Maug, Asuncion, Guguan, and Sarigan) were inspected only from the air, while the other four were studied in more detail. The previously installed seismic stations on Anatahan, Alamagan, and South Pagan were upgraded. A new station was established at the southwestern base of the intermittently active Mount Pagan, on the northern end of Pagan Island. -
Bookletchart™ Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands NOAA Chart 81004
BookletChart™ Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands NOAA Chart 81004 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the the offing. They are a good radar target from a distance of 14 miles, but are reported to give a poor return from a distance of 28 miles. Their National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration total area is approximately 184 square miles. The three principal islands, National Ocean Service Saipan (47 square miles), Tinian (39 square miles) and Rota (32 square Office of Coast Survey miles) form two-thirds of the land area of the group. Aguijan Island (14°51'N., 145°33'E.) is about 022°, 42 miles from Rota www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov Island, and it has steep, cliffy and inaccessible shores. Naftan Rock is 888-990-NOAA about ½ mile southwest of the island’s southwest end. Off-lying banks and dangers.–Esmeralda Bank, about 17 miles What are Nautical Charts? northwest of Aguijan Island, has a least depth of about 33 fathoms (60 meters), and can be recognized by the discoloration of the water, which Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show has the appearance of sulphur being emitted. A 30 fathom (54 meters) water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much bank, marked by boiling sulphur, is about 20 miles northwest of Aguijan more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and Island. Other banks with greater depths are charted in this vicinity. efficient navigation. -
Two Plants from Rota, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
Recovery Outline for Two Plants from Rota Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Species and Nesogenes rotensis (no common name) Listing Status: Endangered; listed April 8, 2004 Osmoxylon mariannense (no common name) Endangered; listed April 8, 2004 Recovery Priority 2 for both species (based on classification as full species, high degree of Number: threat, high recovery potential, and absence of controversy) Population Trend: Declining Scope of Recovery Multi-species Effort: Lead Region: Region 1, Portland, Oregon Lead Field Office: Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 Box 50088 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850-0001 Phone: 808-792-9400 Purpose and Use of this Recovery Outline: In the interim between listing and recovery plan approval, a recovery outline provides preliminary strategies for conservation that conform to the mandates of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). It organizes near-term recovery actions, provides rangewide conservation context for our decisions, and sets the stage for recovery planning and stakeholder involvement. The recovery outline is intended primarily for internal use by us, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to guide conservation actions until a draft recovery plan is developed and distributed for public comment prior to the approval of the final recovery plan. Note on Information Sources: This recovery outline is based on available data contained in the final listing decision (69 FR 18499) for Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense and the proposed listing rule (65 FR 35025) for N. rotensis, O. mariannense, and Tabernaemontana rotensis. Our knowledge of the natural history and ecology of these two plant species is very limited at this point in time; research to gather data critical for the conservation and recovery of these species is identified as a high priority need in this outline. -
Report to the President on 902 Consultations
REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON 902 CONSULTATIONS Special Representatives of the United States and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands January 2017 This page intentionally left blank. About the 902 Consultations Between the United States and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands The Covenant to Establish the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America (Covenant) governs relations between the United States and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Section 902 of the Covenant provides that the Government of the United States and the Government of the Northern Mariana Islands “will designate special representatives to meet and consider in good faith such issues affecting the relationship between the Northern Mariana Islands and the United States as may be designated by either Government and to make a report and recommendations with respect thereto.” These intermittent discussions between the United States and the CNMI have become known as 902 Consultations. Beginning in October 2015, the late CNMI Governor Eloy Inos, followed by Governor Ralph Torres in January 2016, requested U.S. President Barack Obama initiate the 902 Consultations process. In May 2016, President Obama designated Esther Kia’aina, the Assistant Secretary for Insular Areas at the U.S. Department of the Interior, as the Special Representative for the United States for 902 Consultations. Governor Ralph Torres was designated the Special Representative for the CNMI. i Special Representatives and Teams of the United States and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Special Representatives Esther P. Kia’aina Ralph DLG. Torres Assistant Secretary for Insular Areas Governor U.S.