DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting and Sharing Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Holder and User Tools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protecting and Sharing Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Holder and User Tools Ecological Economics 53 (2005) 585–607 www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon Protecting and sharing biodiversity and traditional knowledge: Holder and user tools Geertrui Van Overwalle Centre for Intellectual Property Rights, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium Received 15 June 2004; received in revised form 18 October 2004; accepted 25 October 2004 Available online 11 May 2005 Abstract The present paper deals with the question how legal protection of biodiversity and traditional knowledge can be accommodated and how the results from the use and exploitation of biodiversity and traditional knowledge can be shared. The aim is to cast the various contributions in this volume in a wider framework, by describing and evaluating current intellectual property (IP) protection systems, intellectual property-similar regimes and protection and sharing initiatives outside intellectual property. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Biodiversity; Traditional knowledge; Intellectual property rights; Patents; Plant breeder’s rights; Farmer’s rights; GURTs; ABS regimes; Sui generis regimes; Fair and equitable sharing Abbreviations: ABS, access and benefit sharing; Bonn Guide- 1. Introduction lines, Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit- sharing, agreed by the Conference of the Parties (COP) in the Hague The present paper deals with the question how legal on April 19 2002; CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity; CCIPR, Collective Community Intellectual Property Right; COP, protection of biodiversity and traditional knowledge Conference of the Parties; EPC, European Patent Convention; EPO, can be accommodated and how the results from the use European Patent Office; EGE, European Group on Ethics in Science and exploitation of biodiversity and traditional know- and New Technologies; EIPR, European Intellectual Property ledge can be shared. The aim is to cast the various Review; GURTs, Genetic Use Restriction Technologies; ITPGRFA, contributions in this volume in a wider framework, by International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; IP, intellectual property; IUCN, International Union for describing and evaluating current intellectual property Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources; NHBMs, non- (IP) protection systems, intellectual property-similar human biological materials; TIP right, Traditional Intellectual regimes and protection and sharing initiatives outside Property Right; TRIPs, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of intellectual property. The term protection in the current Intellectual Property Rights; UPA, Utility Patent Act; UPOV, Union survey should be understood in the common sense it is pour la Protection des Obtentions Ve´ge´tales; USC, United States Code; USPTO, United States Patent Office; WIPO, World given in an intellectual property law context and does Intellectual Property Organisation. not refer to the concept of protection in environmental E-mail address: [email protected]. law, nor to the concept of preservation. 0921-8009/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.014 586 G. Van Overwalle / Ecological Economics 53 (2005) 585–607 The paper first addresses some of the major within species, between species and of ecosystemsQ. concepts used in the current debate: biodiversity, dBiological resourcesT include bgenetic resources, (traditional) knowledge, holders and users (Section 2). organisms or parts thereof, populations, or any other The paper then embarks on a wide and in-depth tour biotic component of ecosystems with actual or d’horizon of the legal instruments which can serve to potential use or value for humanityQ. dGenetic protect biodiversity and traditional knowledge, seen resourcesT means bgenetic material of actual or from the perspective of biodiversity and traditional potential valueQ. While the language of the CBD knowledge holders (Section 3). Next, the legal tools provides a broad scope for action, CBD discussion are explored which can be helpful in sharing the documents suggest that the parties are at present benefits resulting from biodiversity and traditional focusing on non-human biological materials knowledge, from the perspective of responsible users (NHBMs) and their natural habitats (Polski, in this (Section 4). After this expansive survey of the various issue; Hassemer, 2004). Those resources thus encom- legal initiatives, the paper closes with some conclu- pass pharmaceutical as well as natural product sions and recommendations (Section 5). resources and crop genetic resources. In addition to the semantic discussion on the notion of dbiodiversityT, there has been an interesting debate 2. Major concepts on the economic nature and value of biodiversity. Polski takes the view that NHBMs are components of In the search for new pharmaceutical, biotechno- bcommon pool resourcesQ and are themselves logical or agricultural products, two different but bcommon pool goodsQ (see also Maier-Rigaud and closely related components have to be distinguished: Apesteguia, 2004). The question arises to which the use of a tangible element, biological material, and extent this economic qualification has/should have the appropriation of an intangible component, tradi- any effect on our thinking on intellectual property tional knowledge. The World Intellectual Property concepts in the field of biodiversity. This question Organisation (WIPO) takes the view that the term calls for further investigation. dtraditional knowledgeT refers to both tangible and non-tangible components: the tangible component of 2.2. Knowledge traditional knowledge mainly refers to genetic resour- ces, whereas the intangible component of traditional 2.2.1. Traditional knowledge knowledge mainly refers to the knowledge (WIPO, A key concept in the current debate is dtraditional 2001). However, for clarity’s sake and in view of the knowledgeT. At present, one interpretation seems to be differing applicable IP regimes, it is better not to plug commonly accepted. The term traditional knowledge the notion dbiodiversityT into the notion of traditional is understood to comprise both aesthetic and useful knowledge, but to address them as two closely related, elements, as well as literary, artistic or scientific but different concepts. creations. Consequently, categories of traditional knowledge include, inter alea, expressions of folklore 2.1. Biodiversity in the form of music, dance, song, handicrafts, designs, stories and artwork; elements of language; Article 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity agricultural knowledge; medicinal knowledge (WIPO, (CBD)1 stipulates that dbiological diversityT means 2001; Leistner, 2004). De Carvalho (1999, 2003) bthe variability among living organisms from all introduces an interesting distinction in this regard: sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and dtraditional knowledge stricto sensuT, encompassing other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological com- the knowledge itself and dtraditional knowledge lato plexes of which they are part; this includes diversity sensuT, encompassing the former plus expressions of traditional knowledge. Efforts have been made to classify the various 1 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 5 June 1992. See types of traditional knowledge. In international dis- http://www.unep.ch/bio/conv-e.html. course it is agreed that the term dtraditional know- G. Van Overwalle / Ecological Economics 53 (2005) 585–607 587 ledgeT can be subdivided in three classes: traditional statutory definition of the term invention. The EPC medicinal knowledge (TMK), traditional agricultural Implementing Measures, however, underline that the knowledge (TAK) and traditional ecological know- invention must be of technical character to the extent ledge (TEK).2 The class of traditional agricultural that it must relate to a technical field4, must be knowledge relates to knowledge leading to crop concerned with a technical problem5 and must have improvement. technical features in terms of which the matter for A distinction is made between dtraditional know- which invention is sought, can be defined in the ledgeT and dindigenous knowledgeT. Indigenous claim.6 EPC case law confirms this interpretation and knowledge is a subset within the traditional know- underlines that an invention must have a technical ledge category: indigenous knowledge is traditional character, must provide a technical contribution to the knowledge held and used by communities, peoples art and must solve a technical problem. The same and nations that are indigenous (WIPO, 2001; Stoll approach is taken in legal doctrine: inventions are and Von Hahn, 2004). considered creations in the technical field which An economic assessment of traditional knowledge, contain a btechnical teachingQ, what the Germans call in its turn, seems less omnipresent. However, recently bein Lehre zum technischen HandelnQ (Benkard, a classification of local knowledge is developed which 1993; Remouchamps, 1970) or what in the United might be fruitful for a law and economics perspective. States is known as bteaching rulesQ (Bent et al., 1987). Gupta distinguishes three contested domains of local In conclusion, in a patent context, dknowledgeT is knowledge: community knowledge, knowledge in the mainly considered to be dtechnical knowledgeT. public domain and individual knowledge (Gupta, In the field of the life sciences, there is one area of 2004, p.3). technical knowledge which is of major importance, viz. biotechnology. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crop Genetic Resources Bulletin Number 2 an Economic Appraisal May 2005 Kelly Day Rubenstein, Paul Heisey, Robbin Shoemaker, John Sullivan, and George Frisvold
    A Report from the Economic Research Service United States Department www.ers.usda.gov of Agriculture Economic Information Crop Genetic Resources Bulletin Number 2 An Economic Appraisal May 2005 Kelly Day Rubenstein, Paul Heisey, Robbin Shoemaker, John Sullivan, and George Frisvold Abstract: Crop genetic resources are the basis of agricultural production, and significant economic benefits have resulted from their conservation and use. However, crop genetic resources are largely public goods, so private incentives for genetic resource conservation may fall short of achieving public objectives. Within the U.S. germplasm system, certain crop collec- tions lack sufficient diversity to reduce vulnerability to pests and diseases. Many such genetic resources lie outside the United States. This report examines the role of genetic resources, genetic diversity, and efforts to value genetic resources. The report also evaluates economic and institutional fac- tors influencing the flow of genetic resources, including international agree- ments, and their significance for agricultural research and development in the United States. Keywords: Genetic resources, genetic diversity, germplasm, R&D, interna- tional transfer of genetic resources, in situ conservation, ex situ conserva- tion, gene banks, intellectual property. Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Allan Stoner, Henry Shands, and Peter Bretting for their thoughtful reviews and their valuable comments. Thanks for reviews above and beyond the call of duty belong to June Blalock, whose patience and insight were critical to the production of this report. We also thank Joe Cooper who reviewed portions of the manuscripts. Keith Wiebe provided helpful guidance in the development of the final draft. We thank Dale Simms for his excellent editorial work and Susan DeGeorge for her help with graphics and layout.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Genetics and Biotechnology in Biodiversity
    diversity Plant Genetics and Biotechnology in Biodiversity Edited by Rosa Rao and Giandomenico Corrado Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Diversity www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Plant Genetics and Biotechnology in Biodiversity Plant Genetics and Biotechnology in Biodiversity Special Issue Editors Rosa Rao Giandomenico Corrado MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editors Rosa Rao Giandomenico Corrado Universita` degli Studi di Napoli Universita` degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” “Federico II” Italy Italy Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Diversity (ISSN 1424-2818) from 2017 to 2018 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity/special issues/plant genetics biotechnology) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03842-003-3 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03842-004-0 (PDF) Articles in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book taken as a whole is c 2018 MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Genetic Resources As Commons: the Model of Fao’S International Treaty
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES AS COMMONS: THE MODEL OF FAO’S INTERNATIONAL TREATY Dr. María Iglesias Introduction After almost 7 years of negotiations, the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (hereinafter ITPGRFA) was adopted in November 20011. The Treaty already recognises in its Preamble that plant genetic resources for food and agriculture are a common concern of all countries, in that all countries depend very largely on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture that originated elsewhere. Thus, the main objectives of the ITPGRFA are the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (hereinafter PGRFAs) and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use, in harmony with the Convention on Biological Diversity, for sustainable agriculture and food security2. Although the Treaty covers all PGRs3, it establishes an international commons pool, the so called multilateral system, only for certain kinds of resources that will guarantee the access to these resources and the sharing of benefits 1 The ITPGRFA entered in to force in June 2004. In December 2008, 119 states had ratified it. 2 Art. 1. The ITPGRFA may be considered in fact as a special application of art. 15 (Access to Genetic Resources) of the Convention on Biological Diversity: “1. Recognizing the sovereign rights of States over their natural resources, the authority to determine access to genetic resources rests with the national governments and is subject to national legislation. 2. Each Contracting Party shall endeavour to create conditions to facilitate access to genetic resources for environmentally sound uses by other Contracting Parties and not to impose restrictions that run counter to the objectives of this Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Genetic Resources Conservation: Integrated Strategies
    PGR conservation: Integrated strategies. Ganeshan Plant Genetic Resources conservation: Integrated strategies S. Ganeshan Tropical Botanic Garden & Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, India. Plant Genetic Resources (PGRs) comprise a heterogeneous group of plant species involving herbs, shrubs, lianas and trees. About 90% of the world’s food comes from just 20 plant species. There is a need to increase the number of species to be brought under cultivation. Plant breeders find the need to use wild species and to introduce them into cultivated forms for the desired qualities of resistance to pests and diseases and the ability to withstand adverse soil and weather conditions. India's biological diversity is very rich but unfortunately its wealth is being eroded due to lack of integrated conservation approaches. This diversity needs to be conserved and the immediate task will be to devise and enforce time bound action plans for saving the plant species as well as their habitats. Action has to be directed towards all levels of conservation, in situ and ex situ. The conservation strategies need to be integrated and based on species specific decision support systems, which could be based on research and development outputs. Appropriate links are desirable between in situ and ex situ conservation approaches keeping the in situ reservoirs as base biological capital, sourcing PGRs in a sustainable manner for creation of core ex situ reservoirs representing the entire genetic diversity of the desired species or a combination of them. Need based technological interventions for ex situ conservation such as creation of a back up in vitro active gene bank for an FGB, strengthened by cryobanking of species specific meristem, seed, pollen and DNA as complementary conservation approaches to capture the entire range of genetic diversity will have to be explored.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Tragedy of the Commons" in Plant Genetic Resources: the Need for a New International Regime Centered Around an International Biotechnology Patent Office
    Gulati: The "Tragedy of the Commons" in Plant Genetic Resources: The Need for a New International Regime Centered Around an International Biotechnology Patent Office Note The "Tragedy of the Commons" in Plant Genetic Resources: The Need for a New International Regime Centered Around an International Biotechnology Patent Office Chetan Gulati- The last several centuries have seen a transformation in the ways in which wealth is generated. As society has transformed itself in the post- industrial era, "knowledge" and "information," as opposed to land and physical property, have increasingly become the primary sources of wealth generation.1 For example, historically, it was ownership of the forest that was the principal channel for the derivation of riches. Today it is the possession of the patent in the pharmaceutical product derived from the leaves of the trees of the very same forest that is the fountain from which the greatest wealth springs. It is not surprising, therefore, that the strategy of wealth maximization has shifted from the desire to accumulate physical property to one in which the domination2 of intellectual property rights ("IPRs") has become preeminent. As already alluded to, the products derived from plant genetic resources ("PGRs")3 are major sources of wealth generation for developed t J.D., Yale Law School, expected 2002. I am grateful to Professor Gideon Parchomovsky for his guidance and valuable commentary. I should also thank my colleagues at the Yale Law School, especially Saema Somalya, Jean Tom and the other editors of the Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, without whose constant challenge to my ideas, this project would never have come to fruition.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Conservation: How Can the Regulation of Bioprospecting
    N°06/13 JUNE 2013 | BIODIVERSITY Biodiversity conservation: How can the regulation of bioprospecting under the Nagoya Protocol make a difference? Claudio Chiarolla, Renaud Lapeyre, Romain Pirard (IDDRI) THE REGULATION OF BIOPROSPECTING: WHAT IS IT? AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? The need to protect biodiversity and to promote fairness in the use of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge has engendered one of the most contentious debates of the 21st century between devel- oped and developing countries. This debate has fundamental implications for the way in which basic and applied research on genetic resources and biodiversity is conducted and its results are made available between and within peoples and societies. Therefore, the regulation of bioprospecting –i.e. “the search for plant and animal species from which medicinal drugs and other commercially valuable compounds can be obtained”– not only tells stories about biodiversity conservation, but also about food security, global health, intellectual property, indigenous peoples, equity, justice and human rights. NEW PERSPECTIVES: BIOPROSPECTING CONTRACTS AS MARKET- BASED INSTRUMENTS In a context of financial constraint, MBIs are seen as a potential tool to help foster biodiversity conservation. As private contracts between two (or more) parties (theoretically Coasean agreements), bioprospecting contracts could be more efficient than command-and-control regulations aimed at biodiversity conservation. Aiming to regulate bioprospecting, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Shar- ing (ABS), adopted in 2010, should help to stop the misappropriation This article is based on research that has of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge (known as received a financial support from the French ‘biopiracy’), while providing legal certainty for public and private users government in the framework of the programme of such resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Plant Genetic Resource Management for Adaptation to Climate Change a Review of Selected Literature
    Economics of plant genetic resource management for adaptation to climate change A review of selected literature Solomon Asfaw and Leslie Lipper ESA Working paper No. 12-02 April 2012 Agricultural Development Economics Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations www.fao.org/economic/esa Economics of plant genetic resource management for adaptation to climate change A review of selected literature Solomon Asfaw and Leslie Lipper Abstract Climate change is projected to change production conditions for agricultural producers globally. In the developing world, most of the projected changes will result in a reduction of agricultural productivity, with concomitant reductions in food security. Because agricultural production remains the main source of income for most rural communities, adaptation of the agricultural sector to the adverse effects of climate change will be imperative to protect and improve the livelihoods of the poor and to ensure food security. Adaptation will require farmers to make adjustments and employ a range of actions to enhance the resilience of local food systems that increase their net revenue by reducing the potential damage from climate change. Their capacity to make the required adjustments depends on the existence of policies and investments to support farmers’ access to materials and information, as well as to provide the proper economic incentives to stimulate changes. Responding to a changing climate will also require changes in PGRFA management to address both immediate and slow onset changes. There are a range of adaptation options involving changes in PGRFA management, including changing crops, varieties and farming practices. These options are not mutually exclusive, and in fact are most often used on combinations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in 2014–2020”
    Programme „Collection and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in 2014–2020” Introduction The Programme „Collection and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in 2014–2020“ (hereinafter the Programme) provides the objectives and the most important activities of the collection and conservation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. In Estonia, the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of the Environment are responsible for the collection and conservation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Need to draw up the Programme Drawing up the Programme was caused by the fulfilment of the commitments of the Republic of Estonia proceeding from international agreements, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Second Global Plan of Action for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (see Annex 1). The Programme also serves as the basis for the promotion of the National Programme for Plant Breeding 2009–2019 approved by Order No 152 of the Minister of Agriculture, 3 July, 2008, and related to the assurance of the sustainable development of Estonian plant breeding and the conservation breeding of existing varieties, healthy and safe food, the sustainable use of natural and environmental resources, the maintenance of genetic and landscape diversity and the reduction of climate change hazards. The need to draw up the Programme 2014–2020 was caused by the finalisation of the Programme „Collection and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in 2007–2013“ approved by Order No 67 of the Minister of Agriculture, 23 March 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • UNU/IAS Report the International Regime for Bioprospecting Existing Policies and Emerging Issues for Antarctica This Report Was Prepared By: Dagmar Lohan Sam Johnston
    UNU/IAS Report The International Regime for Bioprospecting Existing Policies and Emerging Issues for Antarctica This report was prepared by: Dagmar Lohan Sam Johnston We thank the following people for valuable contributions made: Mike Richardson Jill Barret Tony Poole Lyle Glowka Sarah Laird Glenys Parry Martin Smith The organisers and participants of the meeting “Bioprospecting in Antarctica” (an academic workshop) For further information, contact: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU/IAS) 5–53–67 Jingumae, Shibuya–ku, Tokyo, 150–8304, Japan Tel +81–3–5467–2323, Fax +81–3–5467–2324 Email [email protected], URL http://www.ias.unu.edu Copyright © 2003 UNU/IAS All Rights Reserved Design by Brechtje Zoet UNU/IAS Report The International Regime for Bioprospecting Existing Policies and Emerging Issues for Antarctica August 2003 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Review of Biological Prospecting Activities in Antarctica 6 3 Overview of Biological Prospecting Trends Elsewhere 9 3.1 General Industry Trends 9 3.2 Bioprospecting for Extremophiles 10 4 Bioprospecting and the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) 11 4.1 Legislative Background 11 4.2 Activities of ATS Bodies 13 5 International Policies Governing Bioprospecting Activities 15 5.1 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 15 5.2 The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 17 5.3 World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 18 5.4 International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 19 5.5 The World Summit on Sustainable Development 19 6 Conclusion 20 7 Epilogue 22 Endnotes 23 1 Introduction An increasing amount of the scientific research on the flora and fauna of Antarctic is underway with a view to identifying commercially useful genetic and biochemical resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Prospecting & Access and Benefit-Sharing an Introductory Primer
    Biodiversity prospecting & access and benefit-sharing H An introductory primer HHH Sarah A Laird & Rachel Wynberg HHH H YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYY Biodiversity prospecting & access and benefit-sharing An introductory primer by Sarah A Laird & Rachel Wynberg Y E i YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, DFID or GTZ concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, DFID or GTZ. Published by: IUCN, Pretoria, South Africa. Copyright: © 2003 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Sarah A Laird & Rachel Wynberg (2003). Biodiversity prospecting & access and benefit sharing. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 40 pp. ISBN: 2–8317–0729–3 Typeset in Avenir Cover design: Page Arts, Cape Town Cover illustration: Meg Jordi Layout: Page Arts, Cape Town Illustrations: Meg Jordi (pages 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 16, 19, 25, 27) Photographs: Rachel Wynberg (pages 12, 13) Printed by: Available from: IUCN-SA (World Conservation Union) Hatfield Forum West 1067 Arcadia Street, 3rd Floor North Wing Hatfield Pretoria Postal address: P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Genetic Resources
    CAB ABSTRACTS HOT TOPIC: Plant genetic resources Plant genetic resources have the potential to significantly contribute to food security through the provisioning of traits that will allow crops to become more resilient and adaptive to changing climatic conditions and outbreaks of disease. The conservation of these resources is therefore of worldwide importance. CAB Abstracts database covers the world literature on the genetic resources of all types of crops for both food and non-food uses. The global coverage of research ensures that information is available on crops grown from temperate to tropical regions of the globe. CABI’s CAB Abstracts database comprehensively covers hot topics that matter CAB Abstracts sources the world literature to provide the complete picture on plant genetic resources, including information on: • Genomic technologies: genome sequencing and • Utilization of plant genetic resources: harnessing other technologies can determine the likely utility of the genetic variability present in crop wild relatives and germplasm in crop improvement. underutilized crops is essential to develop crops that are Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic more resilient to climate change and pests and diseases. variation in cultivated and wild rice. Molecular characterization of sugarcane genotypes for cold Nature Genetics, 2018 tolerance. Agricultural Research Journal, 2018 Crop improvement using genome editing. Plant Breeding Reviews, 2018 Molecular cloning and characterization of wild eggplant Solanum aculeatissimum NBS-LRR gene, involved in plant • Conservation of plant genetic resources: correct resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. management and maintenance of germplasm is essential for International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018 securing our future food supply. Development of an in situ conservation strategy for crop • Sustainable diets and nutrition: understanding the wild relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefit Sharing Mechanisms for Agricultural Genetic Diversity Use and In-Situ Conservation
    Benefit sharing mechanisms for agricultural genetic diversity use and in-situ conservation. by Wenjuan Cheng, Alessio D’Amato, Giacomo Pallante SEEDS is an interuniversity research centre. It develops research and higher education projects in the fields of ecological and environmental economics, with a special focus on the role of policy and innovation. Main fields of action are environmental policy, economics of innovation, energy economics and policy, economic evaluation by stated preference techniques, waste management and policy, climate change and development. The SEEDS Working Paper Series are indexed in RePEc and Google Scholar. Papers can be downloaded free of charge from the following websites: http://www.sustainability-seeds.org/. Enquiries:[email protected] SEEDS Working Paper 10/2018 May 2018 Wenjuan Cheng, Alessio D’Amato, Giacomo Pallante The opinions expressed in this working paper do not necessarily reflect the position of SEEDS as a whole. Bene t sharing mechanisms for agricultural genetic diversity use and in-situ conservation. Wenjuan Cheng , Alessio DAmato ,y Giacomo Pallante z JEL Codes: O38 , Q16, Q57 Abstract The agricultural genetic diversity is reducing at an accelerating pace. Bene t sharing mechanisms are well-known instruments to incentivize local genetic resource providers to maintain in-situ diversity and to avoid free-riding behaviour by multinational bioprospecting rms. We explore the role of these mechanisms in a setting where the output of bioprospecting activities (i.e. a modern seeds variety), competes with traditional agriculture, and the latter is necessary to conserve the genetic pool from which the multinational could extract the resources for developing new modern varieties in the future.
    [Show full text]