The GAO Review, Vol. 13, Issue 2, Spring 1978

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The GAO Review, Vol. 13, Issue 2, Spring 1978 SCULPTURES AT THE “G” STREET ENTRANCE (Compressed view) American laborers and professional workers are depicted in the bas-relief sculptures that decorate the red granite portals of the recessed entrance of the buff limestone GAO Building on “G” Street. The sculptures were designed in 1951 by Joseph Kiselewski, noted U.S. sculptor, of New York. Nine feet high and 15 feet long. the two panels curve around both sides of the entrance. They contain about 30 figures representing Americans most affected by Government programs. On the front and back covers of THEGAO REVIEWis a partial section of the two tiers that divide each panel. The panel on the right side of the entrance depicts agriculture in the top tier and mining in the bottom one. Among other themes included in this panel are fishing, warehousing, and transportation. The panel on the left side of the entrance shows the professional worker and the occupa- tions that concerned the economy in the 1950s. These included the themes of engineer- ing, science, education, and art. Themes such as the military were left out at the time, 5 years after World War II. and themes such as space, welfare. crime, and atomic energy had not yet become areas of major national concern. ~ .. ~___ Published quarterly by the U S General Accounting Office. Washington, D C 20548 Application to mail at controlled circulation rates is pending at Washington, D C 20402 For sale by the Superintendent of Dacu- ments. U S Government Printing Office, Washington, D C 20402 Price $1 80 (single copy) Subscription price’ $7 00 per year, $1 75 additional for foreign mailing Postmaster Send Forms 3579 to U S General Accounting Office. Washington, D.C. 20548 THE GAO SPRING 1978 REVIEW VOLUME 13 ISSUE 2 Future of the American City 1 -/ Contentii ELMER B. STAATS ..........Ya86,>. ..... 1 GAO's Space Renovation Effort: Project Management in the Real World LARRY A. HERRMANN .......................7J[gL)& 6 c Standard Definitions: Missing and Needed Software Tools STEVEN MERRIIT ...y$&?? 7......... 17 Works of Art at GAO I JOSEPH S. ROSAPEPE ..........................7~[r-&?3 28 6' A Summary of Actions Taken by the AlCPA To Improve the Acco ting Pr fessm JACQULYN MULLINS .... .yg.{$?d!.T.. .. 35 A Commonsense Approach to Writing Reports LOWELL MININGER ........................... 40 Building a Dynamic and Comprehensive EEO Program ALEXANDER A. SILVA ........ .7;L!:.s-! c> .. 48 A Nickel Here, a Nickel There- Returnables Are Worth the Price! D. LAMAR WHITE .............................j72f5 // 53 The Team Approach: Stirring the Pot TIMOTHY D. DESMOND ..............yg.c.C?<c& 58 The Critical Path Method Applied to GAO Reviews JOHN C. KARMENDY and THOMAS P. MON." . .=&666 The Inefficiency of Waste .......................... 73 News and Notes Foreign Bribes Are Now Illegal ....................... 77 Civilian Personnel Law Manual ....................... 77 The Two Faces of GAO ............................. 77 Federal Contracts To Be Tracked .................. 78 Cost Accounting Standards Board ................... 78 New OTA Director.. ................................ 79 The OGC Adviser .................................. 80 From Australia ..................................... 80 Paperwork Commission ............................. 80 i Ah4 Sets Up international Section. 81 New Publication on Auditing and Accounting for Grants-in-Aid . 81 Guide to Accounting Periodicals Revised . 81 Dan Borth . .. 81 Richard J. Madison . 82 Legislative Developments . .?2t!+&Lf. a4 Reflections . , . 87 GAO Staff Changes . , , . 89 Professional Activities . 96 New Staff Members . 106 Readers' Comments . 1oa elected articles in the REVIEW are indexed In the ACCOUNTANTS INDEX ublished by the American institute of Certified Public Accountants. ubiished quarterly for the professional staff of the US. General Accounting mce. ii ELMER B. STAATS ---’ COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES Future of the American City Revitalization of urban centers is seen as necessary for social and economic progress of the Nation. GAO studies and reports in the area are outlined in this excerpt adapted from a talk by Comptroller General Staats before the Philadelphia Bar Association on December 6,1977. There is a very real question That is, the city will serve today as to whether the Ameri- primarily as home for those that can city as we have known cannot care for themselves or it-the center of commerce and those for whom society can find culture, the wellspring of indus- no alternative means of provid- try and ideas-can and should ing care-a reservation for “the survive. Indeed, there are many poor, the deviant, the unwanted, who argue that the city as the and for those who make a busi- economic and intellectual center ness or career of managing them of American society is an anach- for the rest of society.” ronism. This bleak picture, according to These observers argue that the proponents of a national policy to city no longer plays a predomi- revive and rehabilitate American nant economic or social role in cities, rests on a questionable American society and that the premise, namely that the city has realities of the market do not been found wanting in a free and allow for the maintenance of the open market situation. In fact, city at its present size or level of these analysts contend, the pres- activity. In their view, the mar- ent noncompetitive status of the ket should be allowed to operate city is a product more of con- unfettered, forcing each city to scious or unconscious Govern- find a new point of equilibrium ment policy than of the mar- with a smaller population and a ketplace. The plight of the city, further diminished level of eco- in this view, is the result primar- nomic activity. ily of national policies that favor Some observers go further, ar- new construction over rehabilita- guing that the future of the city tion, truck transport over rail- is bleak indeed. Norton Long, for roads, private automobiles over example, predicts that the late mass transit, and investment in 20th century will usher in the capital equipment rather than in era of the (‘city as reservation.” jobs or training programs. This is GAO ReviewlSpring 1978 1 FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN CITY not to imply that the economic present style of low density and advantages of locations outside discontinuous development. central cities are all illusory or Sprawled development is also that the city should occupy the much more wasteful of limited same central place in the eco- energy resources than is denser nomic sphere that it once held. urban development. Suburban and But it does argue that there is a exurban development is much less real and important role for the efficient than the city in the use of city in the American economic energy for transportation, not only and social scene, a role that far in terms of commuting but also in exceeds that of “reservation.” the energy costs of daily activities such as shopping, visiting, going to school, and delivering goods. And, A Vision for the City added to the direct use of energy by the automobile are the energy There are several factors that costs of constructing, lighting and underlie the importance of the even patrolling the new roads and American city and constitute the parking lots that are required for justification, even the require- this type of development. ment, that it be maintained and rehabilitated. In an era in which people have begun to recognize the Energy and Resource Costs limits of our natural resources and the importance of utilizing those There are also substantial resources wisely so as to conserve energy and natural resource costs wherever possible, the city has as- associated with allowing existing sumed a new role as conservator of capital facilities to go unused and land, energy, and natural to deteriorate while at the same resources. time employing scarce resources to Undeveloped land is a limited construct replacement facilities. and valuable commodity, valuable Furthermore, the energy and re- as wilderness, as a resource for source costs of maintenance and recreation and above all as the operation of capital investment are basic input for agriculture. To higher per unit in areas of less permit development of this limited dense development. At the same resource at the present rate of 5 time, they rarely allow significant million acres per year at the same service decreases in previously de- time that we are permitting al- veloped but now partially aban- ready developed land to be under- doned areas. utilized and to deteriorate makes If all these factors are taken into little sense. Furthermore, even account and if existing Federal in- where additional conversion of centives favoring suburban de- land is required for new industry velopment were reassessed, then and housing for an expanding on economic grounds alone there work force and population, it is would be a clear case for the con- certainly wasteful to maintain our tinued role of the city in American 2 GAO ReviewlSpring 1978 FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN CITY life. But there are also important ous breakdown, the urban social reasons for revitalization of neighborhood has demonstrated an the urban community. ability to continue as a cohesive The first of these social reasons and viable social institution. relates to the maintenance of Among the abundant examples of choice of lifestyles. While some strong urban neighborhoods are may perceive this merely as a the Kensington section of matter of taste, it is an important Philadelphia, the North End of component of a free society that Boston, the Stockyards area of people have the opportunity to Chicago, the Hamden section of choose among different sorts of liv- Baltimore, and the Williamsburgh ing patterns. At this time, there is area of Brooklyn. a substantial-and probably growing-number of families and individuals that would prefer an Catalyst in Society urban existence, for reasons of both style and economy. But the most important social I am not optimistically predict- reason of all is the traditional role ing, as so many did in the 1960s, of the city as the locus and catalyst that there is a real or potential of upward mobility in American flood of middle class Americans re- society.
Recommended publications
  • Rods Radio Show Notes September 21St 2011
    Rods Radio Show Notes September 21st 2011 To participate in the show’s live call in dial 318-442-8255 (talk) call between 8:05 and 8:55 on Wednesday morning. Do not attempt to call in on Saturday as this is our encore performance (fancy way to say taped). Attachments, Announcements, and Travels: Home builders seminar “When did that change and why?” September 27th Convention Hall 6:00 pm Bon Swirl grand opening last night Regan Cupples and his wife did great job with rehab, need concept, perfect family stop, and it taste so good. Opens 11:00 am and closes at 8:00 pm. Bon Swirl Jackson Street opposite side of McDonalds. LRAPAC Auction September 15th you can bid and buy dinner with former Edwin Edwards. Bob Merrick CEO with Latter & Blum delivered dinner for two at Galatoires. Attached is email from partner, client, friend who lives in New Orleans and upon my request of tips at dinning to impress client at Galatoires here is his reply. This is worth passing on to family: Rod, Glad to report record fund raiser over $10,000. First ever Realtors economic summit November 1st speakers who have committed John Kennedy state treasure, Malcolm Young executive director of LRA, Elliott Stonecipher poster and Chip Songy partner with Stirling Real Estate born and reared right here in River City. Petrus Hieghts Subdivision study Village Green Subdivision study People not properties: Week before last Steven Moret secretary economic development was our guest on the show Last week President Latter & Blum Inc. Rick Haase was our guest.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Search to Get Phone Data Faster, Please Click to Search
    Click here to search To get phone data faster, please click to search button! (318) 473-8234 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-5823 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-8483 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-6048 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-6831 Rapides Parish of, Coroner's OfficeAlexandria, More info (318) 473-2811 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-8054 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-3772 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-4544 Willie Butler ALEXANDRIA,3109 HERBERT ST More info (318) 473-9036 Joseph Kenner ALEXANDRIA,5002 LISA ST More info (318) 473-6687 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-4682 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-1206 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-5625 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-2717 Willie F Brooks Alexandria,1932 Dublin Rd #B More info (318) 473-7775 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-0748 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-9886 Patsy Washington ALEXANDRIA,516 RENE DR More info (318) 473-5140 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-1083 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-4716 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-2709 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-0610 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-9422 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-9899 Vicki Reynolds Alexandria,2316 Mill Street More info (318) 473-7646 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-8074 Available Data Avaiable More info (318) 473-2578 Available Data Avaiable More info
    [Show full text]
  • In April 1917, John Sharp Williams Was Almost Sixty-Three Years Old, and He Could Barely Hear It Thunder
    1 OF GENTLEMEN AND SOBs: THE GREAT WAR AND PROGRESSIVISM IN MISSISSIPPI In April 1917, John Sharp Williams was almost sixty-three years old, and he could barely hear it thunder. Sitting in the first row of the packed House chamber, he leaned forward, “huddled up, listening . approvingly” as his friend Woodrow Wilson asked the Congress, not so much to declare war as to “accept the status of belligerent” which Germany had already thrust upon the reluctant American nation. No one knew how much of the speech the senior senator from Mississippi heard, though the hand cupped conspicuously behind the right ear betrayed the strain of his effort. Frequently, whether from the words themselves or from the applause they evoked, he removed his hand long enough for a single clap before resuming the previous posture, lest he lose the flow of the president’s eloquence.1 “We are glad,” said Wilson, “now that we see the facts with no veil of false pretense about them, to fight thus for the ultimate peace of the world and for the liberation of its peoples, the German peoples included; for the rights of nations, great and small, and the privilege of men everywhere to choose their way of life and of obedience. The world must be made safe for democracy.” That final pregnant phrase Williams surely heard, for “alone he began to applaud . gravely, emphatically,” and continued until the entire audience, at last gripped by “the full and immense meaning” of the words, erupted into thunderous acclamation.2 Scattered about the crowded chamber were a handful of dissenters, including Williams’s junior colleague from Mississippi, James K.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Parenthood V. Abbott: Evaluating the Admitting Privileges Requirement Under the Undue Burden Standard
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. ABBOTT: EVALUATING THE ADMITTING PRIVILEGES REQUIREMENT UNDER THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD I. IN TRO D U CTIO N .................................................................... 437 II. FACTS AND HOLDING ........................................................ 438 III. LEGAL BACKGROUND ....................................................... 443 A. THE THRESHOLD OF UNDUE BURDEN: RATIONAL BASIS R EVIEW .............................................................. 447 1. SEARCHING INQUIRY: RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW WITH NEXUS ANALYSIS .......................................... 447 2. DEFERENTIAL INQUIRY: RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW WITHOUT NEXUS ANALYSIS ................................... 448 B. THE PRONGS OF UNDUE BURDEN: PURPOSE AND E FFE CT ......................................................................... 449 1. PURPOSE PRONG ANALYSIS .................................... 450 2. EFFECT PRONG ANALYSIS ...................................... 452 -V. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION .................................... 453 A. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT'S RATIONAL BASIS ANALYSIS ......... 454 B. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT'S PURPOSE AND EFFECT PRONG A NALYSIS ..................................................................... 456 V . A N ALY SIS .............................................................................. 457 A. THE DECISION WEAKENED THE UNDUE BURDEN STAN DARD .................................................................... 458 B. THE ADMITTING PRIVILEGES REQUIREMENT AFTER A BBO TT .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and Municipal Ordinances Held Unconstitutional Or Held to Be Preempted by Federal Law
    STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW 2377 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVI- SIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UN- CONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW Three separate lists of Supreme Court decisions appear below: part I lists cases holding state constitutional or statutory provisions unconstitu- tional, part II lists cases holding local laws unconstitutional, and part III lists cases holding that state or local laws are preempted by federal law. As Congress acted as the legislature for the District of Columbia until passage of the Home Rule Act on December 24, 1973, District of Columbia statutes that were enacted by Congress are treated as federal statutes (and included in a prior appendix), and District of Columbia statutes en- acted by the District of Columbia government are treated as state stat- utes. Each case is briefly summarized, and the votes of Justices are indi- cated unless the Court’s decision was unanimous. Justices who write or join the majority or plurality opinion are listed under “Justices concur- ring”, whether or not they write separate concurring opinions, and Jus- tices who do not join the majority or plurality opinion, but write separate opinions concurring in the result, are listed under “Justices specially con- curring.” Previous editions contained only two lists, one for cases holding state laws unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, and one for unconsti- tutional or preempted local laws. The 2002 edition added the third cat- egory because of the different nature of preemption cases. State or local laws held to be preempted by federal law are void not because they con- travene any provision of the Constitution, but rather because they conflict with a federal statute or treaty, and through operation of the Supremacy Clause.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandria Senior High Logo
    Alexandria senior high logo Continue Applications are accepted weekly starting Friday and ending on Monday at midnight. Breakfast and lunch are served during the week. Pick up will be from 9:30-10:00 at the side door near the cafeteria on Thursday morning. You have to sign up to get food and you need to be a virtual student. If you have multiple students, please fill out the form once for each student. Page 2 Home About administration USA Sex Offender Posts Forms Clubs Music for Students Athletics Guide Counselor Corner Scholarships Staff visit pages of teacher Barnes, Anna Bowers, Mike Dixon, Maria Eller, Beth Foster, Teralyn Gunn, Kerry Ginn, Todd Hartsfield, Philip Howard, Laura Jennings, Christy Johnson, Jason Stacey Kicker, Craig Maples, Cynthia Muncher Tina Owens, Robin Payne, Tres Phillips, Melissa Rae, Katie Sekrest, Kellylyn Shaw, Andy Schofield, Randy Snyder, Tony Tucker, Frank Welch, Whitney Welch, Zach Wiley, Phyllis Shaddix, Paige Forbes, Calendar Nurse Lou Ann Library Fasilitas Alexandria Islamic School, Jl. Pengasinan Raya No 50 Rawa Lumbu Bekasi Timur – Indonesia. Public School in the U.S.Alexandrian High SchoolLocationEducation SchoolShow a map of LouisianaAleksandrian High SchoolShow a map of the United States of America800 Ola LaneAlexandria, Louisiana 71303 United StatesCoordinates31°16′12N 92°29′24W / 31.270°N 92.490°W /31.270; -92.490InformationTypePublicActually 1969Schoice DistrictRapids Parish School BoardPrincipalJody Goodman[required quote]Faculty83 (based on FTE)[1 ]Grades9-12En Student-to-teacher ratio17.2]Color(s) Purple and Gold[2] Athletics ConferenceLHSAAA 2-5A[2]SportsTennis, Basketball, Football, Cheerleading, Dance Team (TroyDolls) and Volley BallMascotTrojans[2]NicknameASHRivalPineville RebelsPeabody WarhorsesWest Monroe RebelsWebsitewww.rapides.k12.la.us/ash/[3] Alexandria High School is a public high school, located in Alexandria, Louisiana, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY 2020 Spring Graduates
    Spring 2020 Graduates GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT RICHARD J. GALLOT, JR., J.D. MAY 8, 2020 GRAMBLING, LOUISIANA SPRING 2020 CANDIDATES FOR GRADUATION SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH Presented by Andolyn Harrison, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Educational & Graduate Studies DOCTOR OF EDUCATION DEGREE DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION SHERITA DELAINE ROBERTSON, Ruston B.A. – Temple University, 1990 M.P.A. - Troy University, 1999 Dissertation Title: Impact of Admissions Standards and Academic Support Services on the Retention Rates for First Generation Students at Selected Historically Black Colleges and Universities in Mississippi and Louisiana Major Professor: Andolyn B. Harrison, Ph.D. ARKEIA VIATRICE THOMAS, New Iberia B.A. – University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 2007 M.Ed. – Grambling State University, 2016 Dissertation Title: A Qualitative Study of Exploring the Academic Success of African American Male Students at a Four-Year Institution Major Professor: Andolyn B. Harrison, Ph.D. VALERIE SMITH WHITE, Arcadia B.S. – Grambling State University, 1981 M.B.A. - Troy State University, 1987 Dissertation Title: A Study of Exploring the Experiences of the Student Veterans as They Pursue a Post- Secondary Degree Major Professor: Andolyn B. Harrison, Ph.D. MASTER OF ARTS Pamela R. Blockwood, Lake Providence Sonya Knight-Martin, Lake Providence B.S. – Grambling State University, 2001 B.S. - Grambling State University, 1990 Major: Marketing Major: Criminal Justice La'Necia Deshund Clinton, Ruston Deshon Mariland, Monroe B.S. - GSU, 2018 B.A. - Grambling State University, 2014 Major: Criminal Justice Major: Psychology Brandon Rashaard Collins, Monroe Tasha Raquel Nelson-Thomas B.A. – University of Louisiana at Monroe, 2017 B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and Municipal Ordinances Held Unconstitutional Or Held to Be Preempted by Federal Law
    STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW 2343 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVI- SIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UN- CONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW Three separate lists of Supreme Court decisions appear below: part I lists cases holding state constitutional or statutory provisions unconstitu- tional, part II lists cases holding local laws unconstitutional, and part III lists cases holding that state or local laws are preempted by federal law. As Congress acted as the legislature for the District of Columbia until passage of the Home Rule Act on December 24, 1973, District of Columbia statutes that were enacted by Congress are treated as federal statutes (and included in a prior appendix), and District of Columbia statutes en- acted by the District of Columbia government are treated as state stat- utes. Each case is briefly summarized, and the votes of Justices are indi- cated unless the Court’s decision was unanimous. Justices who write or join the majority or plurality opinion are listed under “Justices concur- ring”, whether or not they write separate concurring opinions, and Jus- tices who do not join the majority or plurality opinion, but write separate opinions concurring in the result, are listed under “Justices specially con- curring.” Previous editions contained only two lists, one for cases holding state laws unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, and one for unconsti- tutional or preempted local laws. The 2002 edition added the third cat- egory because of the different nature of preemption cases. State or local laws held to be preempted by federal law are void not because they con- travene any provision of the Constitution, but rather because they conflict with a federal statute or treaty, and through operation of the Supremacy Clause.
    [Show full text]
  • I Give Permission for Public Access to My Honors Paper and for Any
    I give permission for public access to my Honors paper and for any copying or digitization to be done at the discretion of the College Archivist and/or the College Librarian. Signed______________________________________ Joe Angelillo Date______________________ The Nomination of L.Q.C. Lamar to the Supreme Court: Popular Constitutionalism, the Reconstruction Amendments, and the End of Reconstruction Joe Angelillo Department of History Rhodes College Memphis, Tennessee 2020 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree with Honors in History ii This Honors paper by Joe Angelillo has been read and approved for Honors in History. Dr. Timothy Huebner Project Advisor ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Dr. Robert Saxe Second Reader ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Dr. Ali Masood Extra-Departmental Reader ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Dr. Jeffrey Jackson Department Chair ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I am deeply indebted to Dr. Timothy Huebner for this project. He provided the idea that became this thesis and has guided me through this and several endeavors at Rhodes College. I would not be a historian today without him. I must also acknowledge my readers, Dr. Robert Saxe and Dr. Ali Masood, who provided essential comments that helped me refine my arguments. I am quite grateful for their time and assistance. Finally, the staff at the Paul Barrett Junior Library, particularly Kenan Padgett, Bill Short, Amanda Ford, and Caitlin Gewin all helped me acquire sources for this project. For this, I am very appreciative. iv Contents Signature Page ii Acknowledgements iii Contents iv List of Illustrations and Tables v Abstract vi Introduction 1 Chapter One: Origins of the Lamar Nomination 10 Chapter Two: The Nomination and Constitutional Interpretation 39 Conclusion: The End of Reconstruction 69 Bibliography 74 v List of Illustrations and Tables Figure 1: L.Q.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Guardians of Historical Knowledge: Textbook Politics, Conservative Activism, and School Reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2014 Guardians of Historical Knowledge: Textbook Politics, Conservative Activism, and School Reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982 Kevin Boland Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Johnson, Kevin Boland, "Guardians of Historical Knowledge: Textbook Politics, Conservative Activism, and School Reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 2456. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/2456 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Template Created By: Damen Peterson 2009, Modified by James Nail 2013 Guardians of historical knowledge: textbook politics, conservative activism, and school reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982 By Kevin Boland Johnson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Department of History Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2014 Copyright by Kevin Boland Johnson 2014 Guardians of historical knowledge: textbook politics, conservative activism, and school reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982 By Kevin Boland Johnson Approved: ____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Textbook Politics, Conservative Activism
    Template Created By: Damen Peterson 2009, Modified by James Nail 2013 Guardians of historical knowledge: textbook politics, conservative activism, and school reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982 By Kevin Boland Johnson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Department of History Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2014 Copyright by Kevin Boland Johnson 2014 Guardians of historical knowledge: textbook politics, conservative activism, and school reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982 By Kevin Boland Johnson Approved: ____________________________________ Jason Morgan Ward (Major Professor) ____________________________________ Richard V. Damms (Minor Professor) ____________________________________ Alison Collis Greene (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Michael Williams (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Mark Hersey (Graduate Coordinator) ____________________________________ R. Gregory Dunaway Professor and Dean College of Arts & Sciences Name: Kevin Boland Johnson Date of Degree: May 17, 2014 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: History Major Professor: Jason Morgan Ward Title of Study: Guardians of historical knowledge: textbook politics, conservative activism, and school reform in Mississippi, 1928-1982 Pages in Study: 326 Candidate for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy This project examines the role cultural transmission of historical myths plays in power relationships
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Or Held to Be Preempted by Federal Law
    STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW 2331 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVI- SIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UN- CONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW Three separate lists of Supreme Court decisions appear below: part I lists cases holding state constitutional or statutory provisions unconstitu- tional, part II lists cases holding local laws unconstitutional, and part III lists cases holding that state or local laws are preempted by federal law. As Congress acted as the legislature for the District of Columbia until passage of the Home Rule Act on December 24, 1973, District of Columbia statutes that were enacted by Congress are treated as federal statutes (and included in a prior appendix), and District of Columbia statutes en- acted by the District of Columbia government are treated as state stat- utes. Each case is briefly summarized, and the votes of Justices are indi- cated unless the Court’s decision was unanimous. Justices who write or join the majority or plurality opinion are listed under “Justices concur- ring”, whether or not they write separate concurring opinions, and Jus- tices who do not join the majority or plurality opinion, but write separate opinions concurring in the result, are listed under “Justices specially con- curring.” Previous editions contained only two lists, one for cases holding state laws unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, and one for unconsti- tutional or preempted local laws. The 2002 edition added the third cat- egory because of the different nature of preemption cases. State or local laws held to be preempted by federal law are void not because they con- travene any provision of the Constitution, but rather because they conflict with a federal statute or treaty, and through operation of the Supremacy Clause.
    [Show full text]