Swedens-Geopolitical-Case-Against
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SWEDEN’S GEOPOLITICAL CASE AGAINST ASSANGE 2010-2019 By Prof. Marcello Ferrada de Noli. Published by Libertarian Books - Sweden. December 2019. Edition updated 11 January 2020. ISBN 978-91-88747-13-6 online edition ISBN 978-91-88747-14-3 paperback edition Cover: Artwork by Arte de Noli (Bergamo, Italy), using a background photo, unidentified author, downloaded in the Internet. Previously reproduced in the Indicter Magazine. @ 2019 Marcello Ferrada de Noli @ 2019 Libertarian Books – Sweden SWEDEN’S GEOPOLITICAL CASE AGAINST ASSANGE 2010-2019 By Marcello Ferrada de Noli LIBERTARIAN BOOKS – Sweden Science, Culture, & Human Rights Libertarianbooks.eu Author’s note: Although this book refers to events of the case arisen 2010-2019, a main coverage of the episodes 2010-2014 is given in my previous book SWEDEN VS. ASSANGE. HUMAN RIGTS ISSUES. (PDF and paperback, 342 pages): Alternative download links for the above book (PDF, 11.2 MB): Libertarianbooks.eu L’Essistenza Sweden’s Geopolitical Case Against Assange 2010-2019 – Marcello Ferrada de Noli CONTENTS FOREWORD ......................................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION. SWEDISH GEOPOLITICS AND THE ASSANGE CASE. ........ 17 Summary ..................................................................................................... 18 The real case against Assange .................................................................... 22 Why Sweden? .............................................................................................. 25 Sweden’s “neutrality”: Formerly at the service of Nazi Germany, afterwards of NATO .................................................................................... 31 Sweden geopolitical Behaviour: the Nazi Germany case ........................... 36 Sweden on Russia – Ideological or geopolitical motivations .................... 43 The Assange case as instrument in the NATO deal .....................................55 The Assange case as conscientization tool in geopolitical propaganda .... 60 Epilogue: ......................................................................................................73 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................... 84 THE NEW GEOPOLITICS OF SWEDEN: FEMINISM, ARMS EXPORTS TO DICTATORSHIPS, & NATO. IMPACT IN THE ASSANGE CASE ....................... 85 US REQUESTED SWEDEN TO PROSECUTE ASSANGE ............................................... 86 THE ASSANGE CASE IN THE CONTEXT OF SWEDEN’S FEMINIST FOREIGN POLICY FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE GAINS. ........................................................................... 89 Impact in the Assange case ......................................................................... 92 THE ASSANGE CASE IN THE CONTEXT OF SWEDEN’S MILITARY STRATEGY ............... 94 How it could happen? ................................................................................. 96 WikiLeaks denounced Sweden’s secret plans of the military ................... 100 AS FORMER SWEDISH PM (AND FM) CARL BILDT WAS PUBLICLY SINGLED OUT BY WIKILEAKS OF BEING US SECRET INFORMATION-OFFICER, SWEDEN’S HIT-JOB ON ASSANGE HARDENED FURTHER. .........................................................................109 THE ANTI-ASSANGE STANCE OF THE SWEDISH VERSION OF AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL .............................................................................................. 116 FORMER PAID AGENT OF SWEDISH SECURITY POLICE DICTATED AMNESTY SWEDEN’S STANCE AGAINST ASSANGE ................................................................................. 117 PAID AGENT OF SWEDISH SECURITY SERVICES IMPLICATED IN SECOND DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST ASSANGE ................................................. 126 An ‘influential agent’ working for Russia? ................................................ 127 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 129 5 Sweden’s Geopolitical Case Against Assange 2010-2019 – Marcello Ferrada de Noli AMNESTY SWEDEN RATHER DEFENDS THE ‘RIGHTS’ OF THE GOVERNMENT THAN THE HUMAN RIGHTS ................................................................................................. 134 SWEDHR ON ROLE OF AMNESTY SWEDEN IN THE ASSANGE CASE. INTERVIEW .... 141 SWEDISH SECTION OF AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL VOTED TO REJECT HUMAN-RIGHT ACTIONS ON CASES ASSANGE, SNOWDEN AND TORTURED PALESTINIAN CHILDREN 148 Interview with Dr. Leif Elinder ................................................................. 152 PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE OF ASSANGE – OPEN LETTER TO AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SWEDEN BY SWEDISH DOCTORS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (SWEDHR) ........................................................................................................................ 155 EXTRADITION ISSUES FROM SWEDEN .........................................................160 THIS IS WHY SWEDEN CONTINUALLY REFUSED TO ISSUE NON-EXTRADITION GUARANTEES TO MR ASSANGE. BUT SWEDEN’S ARGUMENT WAS FALLACIOUS AND HIDES ITS REAL COMMITMENT TO THE US ........................................................... 161 Introduction ............................................................................................... 161 Sweden’s renditions to the US, and other less known Swedish participation in likewise extraditions .............................................................................. 164 Why was the argument of ‘impossibility of non-extradition guarantees’ fallacious? .................................................................................................. 165 Two different Swedish legislation on extradition? ................................... 166 The political cases in which Sweden has denied extradition has nothing to do with US-government requests on ‘terrorists’ ....................................... 169 Would Sweden also regard Assange as “high tech terrorist”? .................. 170 Why is the ‘impossibility of non-extradition guarantees’ a fake? ............. 172 Epilogue: ending the myth “Assange’s extradition from Sweden to the US is not likely” ................................................................................................... 173 MAINSTREAM MEDIA IN US AND SWEDEN FINALLY ADMITTED THAT ASSANGE RISKS TO BE EXTRADITED TO THE US BY THE SWEDISH GOVERNMENT ........................... 181 Why was U.S. exerting pressure on UNWGAD? ....................................... 182 The US government is pursuing a case against Julian Assange on charges of terrorism ................................................................................................ 182 In applying the anti-terrorism legislation, the Swedish government has the legal power to execute the extradition of Assange to the US without the consent of any court of justice. .................................................................. 183 By refusing to abide By UNWG ruling, Sweden, not Assange, is under legal scrutiny ......................................................................................................184 THE STRATEGIC TARGET OF THE EAW WAS NOT THE DETENTION OF ASSANGE, BUT THE CREATION OF AN EXTRADITION PROCESS ......................................................190 An unusual deBate in Sweden around the deadlock in the Assange case .190 6 Sweden’s Geopolitical Case Against Assange 2010-2019 – Marcello Ferrada de Noli On the Swedish media-harassment ........................................................... 193 Why are political dissidents granted political asylum? ............................ 194 A new look into the political motivations of the Swedish EAW against Assange ...................................................................................................... 195 The real target of the EAW: the creation of an extradition process .........198 HOW THE CREATION AND MANAGING OF THE ASSANGE CASE PUT SWEDEN’S INTERNATIONAL PRESTIGE AT STAKE ................................................................. 202 Sweden’s legal praxis not according to democratic countries ................. 203 Early Prosecutor’s statement dismissing Assange case, deleted by Swedish authorities ................................................................................................. 204 The artificially protracted interrogation in London ................................ 205 WHY DID THE UK COURT DEFERRED ASSANGE EXTRADITION HEARING TO NEXT YEAR? ...............................................................................................................210 SWEDEN’S GEOPOLITICAL PARADOX IN THE ASAP ROCKY AFFAIR ........................ 214 The truth is that the Swedish legal system is indeed politicized, and not that “independent” ..................................................................................... 218 Sweden and Trump .................................................................................... 219 A Swedish geopolitical paradox .............................................................. 220 Therefore, it is not true that Swedish Prime Ministers or others at government don’t interfere with the Sweden’s justice system ................. 223 Carl Bildt ................................................................................................... 224 ECUADOR EMBASSY ISSUES IN THE ASSANGE CASE ................................. 226 WHAT WAS BEHIND ECUADOR’S MOVE TO CHANGE ITS AMBASSADOR IN THE UNITED KINGDOM? .....................................................................................................