The Venice Commission of the Council of Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Venice Commission of the Council of Europe PREPARATION OF AN OPINION THE VENICE COMMISSION ➥ Submission to the Commission of a (draft) constitutional or legislative text by a national or international OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE body or the Council of Europe* ➥ Setting up a working group of rapporteur members and experts assisted by the secretariat Who can refer a matter ➥ Comments by the rapporteurs on compliance of the text with MORE INFORMATION: to the Commission? international standards and practice ➥ Visit to the country for talks with the VENICE COMMISSION MEMBER STATES authorities, civil society and other 3 DG-I, Council of Europe 3 Parliaments interested stakeholders 67075 Strasbourg Cedex France Tel.: +33 3 88 41 20 67 Governments Final draft opinion 3 Fax: +33 3 88 41 37 38 3 Courts ➥ Submission of the draft opinion E-mail: [email protected] 3 Ombudspersons to all members of the Commission FOR PRESS CONTACTS COUNCIL OF EUROPE before the plenary session Tatiana MYCHELOVA 3 3 Secretary General 3 ➥ Discussion of the draft opinion in Tel : +33 3 88 41 38 68 3 Committee of Ministers a sub-commission and with the E-mail: [email protected] 3 Parliamentary Assembly national authorities (if necessary) 3 Congress of Local and Regional Authorities ➥ Discussion and adoption of the www.venice.coe.int INTERNATIONAL opinion at plenary session ORGANISATIONS ➥ Submission of the opinion to PREMS121014 European Union 3 the body which requested it 3 OSCE/ODIHR ENG 3 other international organisations ➥ Posting of the final text of the opinion involved in the Commission’s work on the Commission’s website: The Council of Europe is the continent’s www.venice.coe.int leading human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member states, 28 of which are members of the European Union. AMICUS CURIAE OPINIONS All Council of Europe member states have signed up to The Commission may also provide amicus curiae 3 the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed opinions at the request of a constitutional court or the European Court of Human Rights. These opinions to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law. are not on the constitutionality of the act concerned, The European Court of Human Rights oversees but on comparative constitutional and international the implementation of the Convention in the member states. law issues. The Commission also co-operates with ombudspersons through amicus ombud opinions mainly on the legislation that governs their work. * Request for opinion may be sent to the President or the Secretary of the Commission by e-mail / fax / post. CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE ELECTIONS, REFERENDUMS AND ORDINARY JUSTICE AND POLITICAL PARTIES ■ As it believes that constitutional justice is a key ■ Elections and referendums which meet inter- aspect of democracy, the protection of human rights national standards are of the utmost importance and the rule of law, the Venice Commission supports in any democratic society. This is therefore the third constitutional courts and equivalent bodies by of the Commission’s key areas of activity. These Promoting democracy through law The Commission’s activities Mfostering dialogue between judges. Although con- matters are dealt with by the Council for Democratic O stitutionsM differ from country to country, constitu- Elections (CDE), a body comprising representatives C E tional courts canI Sdraw mutual inspiration from the of the Venice Commission, the Parliamentary reasoning they developS on common constitutional Assembly and the Congress of Local and Regional ■ The role of the Venice Commission – whose full ■ Its individual members are university professors OPINIONS AND STUDIES CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS C I principles (“cross-fertilisation”).I Authorities of the Council of Europe. name is the European Commission for Democracy of public and international law, supreme and consti- O through Law – is to provide legal advice to its member tutional court judges and members of national par- ■ The Venice Commission’s primary task is to ■ As the quality of democracy dependsN not only ■ To this end, the Commission compiles and dis- ■ The Venice Commission and the CDE have set provide states with legal advice in the form of legal on the quality of laws, but also on their implementation, N states and, in particular, to help states wishing to liaments. They are designated for four years by the E seminates constitutional case-law in the Bulletin on out the international standards which should apply bring their legal and institutional structures into line member states, but act in their individual capacity. opinions on draft legislation or legislation already in the Commission holds seminars and conferences in Constitutional Case-Law and the CODICES database. to the organisation of elections in the Code of Good with European standards and international experience Mr Gianni Buquicchio is the President of the force which is submitted to it for examination. It also partnership with constitutional courts,V parliaments, They present the most significant decisions delivered Practice in Electoral Matters. They are active in draft- in the fields of democracy, human rights and the rule Commission since December 2009. produces studies and reports on topical issues. Groups central electoral commissions and universities. by over 100 participating courts, as well as constitu- ing guidelines on a number of issues which are of law. of members assisted by the secretariat prepare the tions, laws and descriptions of how the various con- essential for the organisation of elections and the ■ The Commission works in three areas: draft opinions and studies, which are then discussed TRANSNATIONAL STUDIES stitutional courts operate. The Commission also facil- functioning of political parties. They also draw up ■ It also contributes to the dissemination and 3 democratic institutions and and adopted at the Commission’s plenary sessions. AND TRAINING consolidation of a common constitutional heritage, itates the exchange of information between courts opinions and recommendations on electoral legis- fundamental rights; through the online Venice Forum. lation in the member states together with the OSCE/ plays a unique role in conflict management and pro- ■ Reflection and research concerning topical trans- 3 constitutional justice and ordinary justice; ODIHR. vides “emergency constitutional aid” to states in A DIALOGUE-BASED national questions form the basis of the Universities ■ At the request of a constitutional court, the transition. 3 elections, referendums and political parties. WORKING METHOD for Democracy (UniDem) studies and conferences, the Commission may provide amicus curiae opinions on ■ Regarding legislation – although improvements ■ Its permanent secretariat is located in findings and proceedings of which are published in the aspects of comparative international law regarding are desirable, even necessary in a significant number ■ The Commission has 60 member states: the 3 The Commission does not seek to impose the Science and Technique of Democracy series. 47 Council of Europe member states, plus 13 other Strasbourg, France, at the headquarters of the solutions set out in its opinions. Rather, it adopts a cases under way. of states – the problems to be solved mainly concern Council of Europe. Its plenary sessions are held in its implementation. The Commission is therefore countries (Algeria, Brazil, Chile, Israel, Kazakhstan, the non-directive approach based on dialogue and shares ■ In response to co-operation requests from involved in assistance activities concerning the Republic of Korea, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Morocco, Venice, Italy, at the Scuola Grande di San Giovanni member states’ experience and practices. For this non-European courts, the Commission established implementation of international standards on elec- Mexico, Peru, Tunisia and the USA). Evangelista, four times a year (March, June, October reason, a working group visits the country concerned the World Conference on Constitutional Justice, for tions, in co-operation with the other international and December). to meet the various stakeholders and to assess the which it provides the secretariat. situation as objectively as possible. The authorities bodies active in this area. In addition, the VOTA are also able to submit comments on the draft database contains a compendium of member states’ opinions to the Commission. The opinions prepared electoral laws. Commission members are generally heeded by the countries concerned. 3 International institutions, civil society and the media regularly refer to the Commission’s opinions. MEMBERS ■ Albania (1996), Algeria (2007), Andorra (2000), ASSOCIATE MEMBER Armenia (2001), Austria (1990), Azerbaijan (2001), Fields of action Belgium (1990), Bosnia and Herzegovina (2002), Brazil ■ Belarus (1994) (2009), Bulgaria (1992), Chile (2005), Croatia (1997), Cyprus (1990), Czech Republic (1994), Denmark (1990), OBSERVER STATES DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICY/ A LAW-BASED APPROACH TO Estonia (1995), Finland (1990), France (1990), Georgia AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS CO-OPERATION WITH CONFLICT RESOLUTION (1999), Germany (1990), Greece (1990), Hungary ■ Argentina (1995), Canada (1991), Japan (1993), Holy-See (1992), Uruguay (1995) NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES The resolution of a conflict must be based on a viable (1990), Iceland (1993), Ireland (1990), Israel (2008), ■ Assisting states in the constitutional and legis- 3 Italy (1990), Kazakhstan (2011), Kosovo (2014), lative field so as to ensure the democratic functioning 3 Without losing sight of its objective in
Recommended publications
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation Interim Opinion on Constitutional
    Strasbourg, 23 March 2021 CDL-AD(2021)005 Opinion No. 992/2020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) RUSSIAN FEDERATION INTERIM OPINION ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND THE PROCEDURE FOR THEIR ADOPTION Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 126th Plenary Session (online, 19-20 March 2021) on the basis of comments by Mr Nicos ALIVIZATOS (Member, Greece) Ms Claire BAZY MALAURIE (Member, France) Ms Veronika BÍLKOVÁ (Member, Czech Republic) Mr Iain CAMERON (Member, Sweden) Ms Monika HERMANNS (Substitute Member, Germany) Mr Martin KUIJER (Substitute Member, Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2021)005 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 II. Scope of the present opinion .......................................................................................... 4 III. Chronology of the preparation and adoption of the constitutional amendments ............. 4 IV. Analysis of the procedure for the Adoption of the Constitutional Amendments .............. 6 A. Speed of preparation of the amendments - consultations ........................................... 6 B. Competence of the Constitutional Court ..................................................................... 7 C. Competence of the Constitutional Assembly .............................................................. 7 D. Ad hoc procedure .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia Request by the President Pertaining to The
    Strasbourg, 21 February 2017 CDL-REF(2017)008 Opinion No. 877 / 2017 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) SLOVAKIA REQUEST BY THE PRESIDENT PERTAINING TO THE APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT WITH REASONING FOR THE QUESTIONS ASKED AND ATTACHMENTS This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int SLOVAK REPUBLIC RULING of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic PL. ÚS 4/2012 -77 On October 24, 2012, the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, in the Plenary consisting of its President Ms. Ivetta Macejková and Judges Ján Auxt, Peter Brňák, Ľubomír Dobrík, Ľudmila Gajdošíková, Juraj Horváth, Sergej Kohut, Ján Luby, Milan Ľalík, Lajos Mészáros, Marianna Mochnáčová, Ladislav Orosz and Rudolf Tkáčik deliberated in a closed session the petition from a group of Members of National Council of the Slovak Republic (MPs), represented by R. P. (MP), seeking interpretation of Article 102 para. 1 (t) and Article 150 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic and renders the following Interpretation: President of the Slovak Republic has a duty to deal with the proposal of the National Council of the Slovak Republic to appoint the Prosecutor General of the Slovak Republic pursuant to Article 150 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic and, where the latter has been elected in a procedure in accordance with law, to either appoint the nominated candidate within a reasonable period of time, or inform the National Council of the Slovak Republic
    [Show full text]
  • Venice Commission)
    Strasbourg, 16 April 2020 CDL-PI(2020)003 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMPILATION OF VENICE COMMISSION OPINIONS AND REPORTS ON STATES OF EMERGENCY 2 CDL-PI(2020)003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 3 I. BENCHMARKS ............................................................................................................. 4 II. Declaration of state of emergency: definition and substantive requirements ......... 5 III. Derogation from human rights obligations .............................................................. 10 IV. Constitutional entrenchment of the state of emergency ......................................... 12 V. Declaration of state of emergency: competences ................................................... 14 VI. Oversight of the declaration and prolongation of the state of emergency ............ 14 a. Parliamentary oversight ......................................................................................... 14 b. Judicial review ........................................................................................................ 18 VII. Duration of the state of emergency .......................................................................... 21 VIII. Duration of the emergency measures ...................................................................... 22 IX Scope of the emergency measures .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Political Party Regulation 2Nd Edition
    Strasbourg, 14 December 2020 CDL-AD(2020)032 Study No. 881/2017 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) GUIDELINES ON POLITICAL PARTY REGULATION 2ND EDITION Approved by the Council of Democratic Elections at its 69th online meeting (7 October 2020) and Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 125th online Plenary Session (11-12 December 2020) on the basis of comments by OSCE/ODIHR Core Group of Experts on Political Parties Mr Josep Maria CASTELLA ANDREU (Member, Spain) Mr Pieter van DIJK (Expert, Former Member, the Netherlands) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute Member, Republic of Moldova) Mr Ben VERMEULEN (Member, the Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2020)032 - 2 - Table of contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 II. POLITICAL PARTIES: THEIR IMPORTANCE, FUNCTIONS AND REGULATION ............ 7 1. The classification and importance of political parties and their functions ........................ 7 2. Three dimensions ........................................................................................................... 8 3. Two models ..................................................................................................................... 9 III. PRINCIPLES ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Fourth Amendment to The
    Strasbourg, 17 June 2013 CDL-AD(2013)012 Opinion 720 / 2013 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF HUNGARY Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (Venice, 14-15 June 2013) on the basis of comments by Mr Christoph GRABENWARTER (Member, Austria) Mr Wolfgang HOFFMANN-RIEM (Member, Germany) Ms Hanna SUCHOCKA (Member, Poland) Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) Mr Jan VELAERS (Member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2013)012 - 2 - Table of contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 II. Preliminary remarks ...................................................................................................... 3 III. Amendments to the Chapters “Foundation” and “Freedom and Responsibility” of the Fundamental Law ................................................................................................................. 6 A. The protection of marriage and family (Article 1) ....................................................... 6 B. Communist past (Article 3) ........................................................................................ 6 C. The recognition of churches (Article 4) ...................................................................... 8 D. Media access for political parties (Article 5.1) .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CDL-AD(2005)041 Opinion No
    Strasbourg, 19 Decembre 2005 CDL-AD(2005)041 Opinion no. 343 / 2005 Or.Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE EXISTING LEGISLATION IN MONTENEGRO CONCERNING THE ORGANISATION OF REFERENDUMS WITH APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 65th Plenary Session, (Venice, 16-17 December 2005) on the basis of comments by Mr Anthony BRADLEY (Substitute Member, United Kingdom) Mr Carlos CLOSA MONTERO (Member, Spain) Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. - 2 - CDL-AD(2005)041 Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................3 II. A PREREQUISITE: RESPECT FOR GOOD PRACTICE IN ELECTORAL MATTERS.5 III. REQUIRED LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION AND MAJORITY REQUIREMENTS.....7 IV. CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY TO VOTE......................................................................11 V. CONCLUSIONS .....................................................................................................................16 - 3 - CDL-AD(2005)041 I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 27 May 2005, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe requested an opinion of the Venice Commission on the compatibility with applicable international standards of the existing legislation in Montenegro concerning the organisation of referendums, with a special focus on the issues of required turnout, majority and the criteria for the eligibility to vote. 2. This request refers to the plan of the Montenegrin authorities to organise a referendum on the independence of the country. At present, on the basis of the Constitutional Charter, which entered into force on 4 February 2003, Montenegro is a member state of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary Opinion on Act Xxv of 4 April 2017 on The
    Strasbourg, 9 October 2017 CDL-AD(2017)022 Opinion 891 / 2017 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) HUNGARY OPINION ON ACT XXV OF 4 APRIL 2017 ON THE AMENDMENT OF ACT CCIV OF 2011 ON NATIONAL TERTIARY EDUCATION Endorsed by the Venice Commission at its 111th Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 October 2017) on the basis of comments by: Ms R. KIENER (Member, Switzerland) Mr B. VERMEULEN (Member, The Netherlands) Mr D. FARRINGTON (Expert, DGII, Council of Europe) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int 2 CDL-AD(2017)022 CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 II. PRELIMINARY REMARKS ........................................................................................... 3 A. Background .............................................................................................................. 3 1. Constitutional and legal framework ......................................................................... 3 2. Act XXV of 2017 amending the 2011 HEA .............................................................. 6 a. New requirements for foreign universities ............................................................ 6 b. Scope of application ............................................................................................ 7 B. Scope of the Opinion ............................................................................................. 11 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Draft Law on The
    Strasbourg, 20 June 2011 CDL-AD(2011)019 Opinion No. 624 / 2011 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE COUNCIL FOR THE SELECTION OF JUDGES OF KYRGYZSTAN Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 87 th Plenary Session (Venice, 17-18 June 2011) on the basis of comments by Mr Nicolae ESANU (Member, Moldova) Mr Latif HÜSEYNOV (Member, Azerbaijan) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2011)019 - 2 - I. Introduction 1. By a letter of 5 April 2011, Ms Galina Skripkina, Chairperson of the Committee on Constitutional Legislation, State Structure, Legality and Local Self-Governance of the Parliament of Kyrgyzstan (Jogorku Kenesh), has made a request for an opinion on the following three draft Laws: - “the draft Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court” (subject of Opinion 622/2011); - “the draft Constitutional Law on the introduction of changes to the Constitutional Law on the Status of Judges” (subject of Opinion 623/2011); - “the draft Law on the Council for the Selection of Judges” (hereinafter the “draft Law”, subject to the present opinion). 2. As part of a judicial reform package, the Parliament of Kyrgyzstan had also prepared two other draft Laws (on Judicial Self-Government and on the Supreme Court and Local Courts), which were, however, not submitted to the Venice Commission for opinion due to the very short deadlines and the heavy workload of the Venice Commission in preparing the first three opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Second Chamber in European States
    Strasbourg, 1 March/1er mars 2006 CDL(2006)011 Or. Bil. Study No. 335/2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMISSION EUROPEENNE POUR LA DEMOCRATIE PAR LE DROIT (COMMISSION DE VENISE) THE ROLE OF THE SECOND CHAMBER IN EUROPEAN STATES LE ROLE DE LA DEUXIEME CHAMBRE DANS LES ETATS EUROPEENS CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENICE COMMISSION MEMBERS CONTRIBUTIONS DES MEMBRES DE LA COMMISSION DE VENISE This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL(2006)011 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIERES Page THE SECOND CHAMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, by Christoph Grabenwarter, Constitutional Court, Vienna, Substitute Member, Austria......................................................................................3 LE SENAT DE BELGIQUE, par Jean-Claude Scholsem, Université de Liège, Membre, Belgique ..............................................................................................................................................7 ROLE OF THE SECOND HOUSE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, by Cazim Sadikovic, University of Sarajevo, Member, Bosnia and Herzegovina......................................................................................................................................12 THE ROLE OF THE SECOND CHAMBER IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: THE SENATE OF THE PARLIAMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, by Eliska Wagnerova, Constitutional Court, Brno, Member, Czech Republic...........................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Draft Law on the Courts of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CDL-REF(2013)023)1
    Strasbourg, 15 June 2013 CDL-AD(2013)015 Or. Engl. Opinion no. 723 / 2013 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE COURTS OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (Venice, 14-15 June 2013) on the basis of comments by Ms Veronika BILKOVA (Member, Czech Republic) Mr James HAMILTON (Substitute member, Ireland) Mr Konstantine VARDZELASHVILI (Substitute member, Georgia) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2013)015 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 II. General remarks .......................................................................................................... 3 III. Draft Law on the Courts of Bosnia and Herzegovina .................................................... 4 A. Articles 1 (subject matter) and 2 (objective) ............................................................. 5 B. Article 3 (seat and seal) ........................................................................................... 5 C. Article 4 (composition and number of judges) .......................................................... 5 D. Article 6 (accountability) .......................................................................................... 6 E. Article 7 (Protection of Rights) ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Opinion on the Draft Law on The
    Strasbourg, 14 December 2020 CDL-AD(2020)034 Opinion No. 1005/2020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) KOSOVO OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE GOVERNMENT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 125th online Plenary Session (11-12 December 2020) on the basis of comments by Ms Nadia BERNOUSSI (Member, Morocco) Mr Philip DIMITROV (Member, Bulgaria) Mr Murray HUNT (Substitute Member, United Kingdom) Mr Francesco MAIANI (Member, San Marino) Mr Bertrand MATHIEU (Member, Monaco) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2020)034 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 II. Preliminary observations ............................................................................................... 3 III. Domestic legal context .................................................................................................. 4 A. Constitutional context ................................................................................................ 4 B. The draft Law ............................................................................................................ 4 IV. Relevant international standards ............................................................................... 5 A. Transparency as a principle of democratic law-making .............................................. 5 B. The principle of legality .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]