Local Planning Scheme No. 3 Scheme Review Background Analysis 2016 Introduction

CITY OF STIRLING LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO. 3 SCHEME REVIEW BACKGROUND ANALYSIS 2016 INTRODUCTION

PART ONE STRATEGIC CONTEXT

PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

PART FOUR EMERGING ISSUES

PART FIVE NEXT STEPS

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2 INTRODUCTION

KEY PROJECT AIMS: Satisfy requirements of Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Evaluate performance of LPS 3 in supporting good decision-making Assess if LPS 3 is delivering on City’s Strategic goals for growth Determine if new Scheme required or amendment to current LPS 3

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 3 INTRODUCTION: SCHEME AIMS

To provide for convenient, attractive To provide for a range of housing To assist employment & economic and viable commercial centres, which choice in neighbourhoods with a strong growth by facilitating the timely service the needs of the community and community identity and high levels of provision of suitable land for retail, are accessible to pedestrians, cyclists amenity. commercial, industrial, entertainment and public transport users as well as & tourist developments, as well as motorists. providing opportunities for home based employment.

To protect and enhance the To encourage the conservation and To assist in the effective implementation environmental values and natural continued use of identified places and of regional plans and policies including resources of the local government area objects of cultural heritage significance the State Planning Strategy and to promote sustainable land use and development

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 4 PART ONE STRATEGIC CONTEXT

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 5 PART ONE: STRATEGIC CONTEXT

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ACT

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Local Planning Schemes) Regs 2015

RELATED STATE PLANNING FRAMEWORK LEGISLATION & POLICY Metro Strategies Environmental Protection Act MRS Heritage of Western Australia Act State Planning Policies Bush Fires Act Operational Policies

COS STRATEGIC COS PLANNING FRAMEWORK COMMUNITY PLAN Local Planning Strategy LPS 3 LOCAL LAWS Local Planning Policies Structure Plans Local Development Plans

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 6 PART ONE: METROPOLITAN STRATEGIES

TRANSPORT @ 3.5 MILLION Summary

May 2015 Draft Central Sub-regional Planning Framework PERTH

May 2015 Draft Towards Per th and Peel@3.5million Perth and TRANSPORT [email protected] PLAN FOR 3.5 MILLION PEOPLE AND BEYOND

FOR CONSULTATION

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

BIKES PUBLIC TRANSPORT

PEOPLE 2 TREES TREES SMARTPEOPLE 1 CAR TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES HATCH BACK PEOPLE 2 TREES TREES TREES TREES SMALL COMMERCIAL TRUCK

BIKES

TREES Perth and Peel Green

MOTORBIKE AND SCOOTER

PEOPLE 3 TREES TREES PEOPLE 1 PEOPLE 3 Growth Plan for 3.5 million December 2015

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 7 PART ONE: METROPOLITAN STRATEGIES

PERTH + PEEL @ 3.5M

CENTRAL REGION BY 2050 GROWTH OBJECTIVES: 1. CONNECTED CITY ACTIVITY CENTRES + CORRIDORS 2. PROTECTED INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT + ECONOMIC GROWTH

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 8 PART ONE METROPOLITAN STRATEGIES

CENTRAL SUB-REGIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK

SUB-REGIONAL CITY OF STIRLING DWELLING FRAMEWORK TARGETS_ TARGET HOW’S STIRLING TRACKING?

2006 - 2011 ABS, 2011

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 9 PART ONE METROPOLITAN CONTEXT

The Integrated Mass Transit Network TRANSPORT @ 3.5M Yanchep @ 3.5 Million and Beyond

Butler

RAIL Joondalup Ellenbrook

Marshall Road Bellevue Stirling to Murdoch (2.5M) Stirling

Midland Glendalough Morley Perth to Morley (2.7M) Scarborough Beach Bassendean Bayswater

ECU Mt Lawley Stirling City Centre to Morley (beyond 3.5M) Belmont

Perth Shenton Park Airport Central Elizabeth Quay Victoria Park BUS RAPID TRANSIT / LIGHT RAIL Transfer Station QE II-UWA Cannington Forrest eld Glendalough Station to Scarborough Beach Curtin Canning Bridge

Thornlie Booragoon (2.7M) Fremantle Armadale Murdoch

Byford Cockburn Coast ROAD Cockburn Central Reid Hwy upgraded to freeway standard (2.7M) Further work to be undertaken to assess additional rail lines Existing Public Transport Rail Network Stock Road extension from Leach Highway to in this area. Public Transport Rail Network @ 3.5 Million

Public Transport Rail Network Beyond 3.5 Million Rockingham Stephenson Avenue at Jon Sanders Drive (new Bus Rapid Transit or Light Rail @ 3.5 Million Bus Rapid Transit or Light Rail Beyond 3.5 Million

Light Rail @ 3.5 Million

river crossing) (3.5M) Subway Beyond 3.5 Million

Strategic Metropolitan Activity Centre

Mandurah Specialised Centre Connecting Station or Terminus

14 CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION Figure 9: Map – The Integrated Mass Transit Network at 3.5 Million people and beyond 10 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING STRATEGIES

Local Housing Strategy Integrated Transport Strategy

City of Stirling

Local Housing Strategy Retail Modelling and Centres Strategy

FINAL DRAFT

Prepared for Draft Local City of Stirling Planning Strategy Part 1 by Essential Economics Pty Ltd

Planning and Sustainability June 2016 Strategy Local Housing Strategy 1 1 Integrated Transport Strategy

City of Stirling City of Stirling

Local Planning Strategy Housing Strategy Retail Centres Strategy Integrated Transport (2016, Draft) (2010) (2016) Strategy (2009)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 11 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY VISION: CITY OF STIRLING “Focus investment, jobs LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY and growth on corridors and centres around transit; improve the quality of suburbs & centres; and PRIORITISE TRANSPORT GROWTH & & LAND USE IMPROVING the overall liveability of the KEEP THE JOBS INVESTMENT WILL BE THE QUALITY & City.” WE HAVE NOW & IN ACTIVITY COORDINATED LIVEABILITY OF GROW THEM CENTRES & AND THE CITY CORRIDORS INTEGRATED

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 12 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY

THEME 1: ”Prioritise Growth & Investment In Activty Centres & Corridors”

CURRENT ISSUES LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY RESPONSE CONSIDERATIONS FOR SCHEME REVIEW

Activity Centres/Corridors lack City’s growth to be directed to 73 1. Incorporate Centre Zones aligned to SPP 4.2 Activity Centre Hierarchy residential pop ins to underpin Activity Centres & 29 Corridors, (floorspace ranges/diversified uses) viability allowing retention of suburban 2. Activity Centre Plans to guide & coordinate development of larger centres (SPP Activity Centres/Corridors fail to character for families 4.2) provide ‘sense of place’ 3. LDPs / Policies for local/neighbourhood centres & activity corridors Pattern of land use/ development 4. Review zonings of Activity Centres/ Corridors to create opportunities for promotes cars above other expansion / residential infill modes 5. Confine multiple dwellings to Activity Centres, Corridors or as part of place- specific studies 6. Adopt land use & development standards specific to each Centre Zone (floorspace ranges, criteria for retail expansion, car parking, built form) 7. Approach WAPC regarding an additional MRS road classification for Activity Corridors

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 13 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY

THEME 2: ”Keep The Jobs We Have Now & Grow Them”

CURRENT ISSUES LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY RESPONSE CONSIDERATIONS FOR SCHEME REVIEW

Urban areas need to do better in Activity Centres, Corridors, 1. Allow diversified uses in Activity Centres / Corridors providing amenity, connectivity & Tourism Nodes & Specialised 2. Focus retail/commerical growth in centres / corridors (not ad-hoc) infrastructure for job creation & Centres (Edith Cowan) to be key 3. Expand zoning of certain Activity Centres self-sufficiency employment generation nodes 4. Introduce Tourism zone (MST) to promote growth of tourism economy (short- Stirling City Centre / Herdsman- stay accommodation encouraged) Glendalough to become Perth’s second CBD 5. Minimise further loss of industrial land & ensure replacement zones accommodate jobs of the New Economy 6. Limit Activity Centre compatible uses locating in industrial areas (private recreation; large-format retail)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 14 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY

THEME 3: “Transport & Land Use Will Be Coordinated & Integrated”

CURRENT ISSUES LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY RESPONSE CONSIDERATIONS FOR SCHEME REVIEW

Dispersed residential infill Focus growth and transport 1. Activity Centre /Corridor dev. standards to encourage urban environments perpetuating reliance on cars infrastructure on Activity Centre conducive to walking/cycling/PT: City’s grid structure provides / Corridors (public transport & −− active building frontages to key streets active travel) ‘bones’ for walkable −− elimination of car parking from street setbacks neighbourhoods, however poor Enhance streetscapes in lower −− smaller street block sizes for improved connectivity quality built form / loss of trees density suburbs to encourage has caused streetscape decline walking/cycling/PT use −− new/upgraded public spaces for walking/cycling Alternative options for funding −− minimum mandatory residential, non-retail & community/recreational Existing road network at capacity infrastructure uses in centres / corridors Timely investment in transport 2. Review reserve requirements for planned public transport infrastructure & infrastructure (including light rail) secure additional reserves where required is needed to underpin successful 3. Parking standards for Centres / Corridors and industrial areas to limit parking infill to levels commensurate with road capacity & allow of flexibility for change of use 4. Reserves for public parking stations within activity centres, corridors & tourist nodes 5. Development contributions for footpaths, cycling infrastructure/ end-of-trip facilities & public transport

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 15 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY

THEME 4: “Improve The Quality & Liveability Of The City”

CURRENT ISSUES LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY RESPONSE CONSIDERATIONS FOR SCHEME REVIEW

Pressure for infill has potential to Focus residential growth in 1. Scheme zonings & instruments adopted under Scheme to encourage greater compromise amenity & liveability Activity Centres/Corridors & housing diversity across City - missing middle if not well planned preserve character of suburban 2. More flexible zonings & min. mandatory dwellings to encourage apartments ‘Backyard infill’ causing areas in & adjoining Activity Centres/ Corridors significant urban tree loss Diversify housing across the City 3. Scheme & related instruments to consider development incentives in return Housing choice not keeping pace Ensure quality/ quantity & for ‘public benefit’ - public art, civic space, streetscape enhancements, ground with demographic changes distribution of POS & other floor activation etc City’s growing population is community facilities meets 4. Explore options for funding streetscape and POS enhancements (flat rate increasing pressure on POS & community need contribution per new dwelling or more extensive POS cash-in-lieu) recreation facilities Encourage expansion/ 5. Include standards in Scheme & related instruments for tree protection diversification of local/ 6. Review zones over local/neighbourhood centres (expansion/diversification/ neighbourhood centres new centre options) 7. Review residential coding of heritage areas to eliminate potential conflicts with conservation objectives

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 16 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGY

INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGY TRANSPORT @ 3.5 MILLION (CITY OF STIRLING) (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT)

Reid Highway heavy rail link Perth City to ECU & Morley Rail by connecting Stirling City to Morley 2.7M (tunnel to Morley) Stirling to Murdoch Orbital by 2.5M (includes extensive tunnelling) Stirling City Centre to Morley beyond 3.5M HEAVY RAIL

3 x light rail connections linking to Bus Rapid Transit / Light Rail - future CBD network. Glendalough to Scarborough CBD to Scarborough via Scarborough Beach Road CBD to Morley via Beaufort Street LIGHT RAIL / RAPID BUS TRANSIT CBD to Balga via Wanneroo Road Funding models explored incl. Value Capture

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 17 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // RETAIL CENTRES STRATEGY STRATEGY DIRECTION: BULKY Retain retail hierarchy & expand centres GOODS STRATEGIC 123,650M2 METROPOLITAN Focus retail expansion where greatest CENTRES 119,500M2 potential for growth LOCAL CENTRES CITY OF STIRLING 2 Diversify uses from ‘retail-oriented’ 10,330M RETAIL centres PROFILE SECONDARY “Re-localised retail” + improve liveability CENTRES through a better local offer 100,800M2

NEIGHBOURHOOD CENTRES 47,870M2

DISTRICT CENTRES 112,660M2

(ESSENTIAL ECONOMICS, 2016)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 18 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // RETAIL CENTRES STRATEGY IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHEME Zone for each centre type Provisions to cater for: Expansion of small centres (floorspace ranges) Diversification of uses (residential / non-retail Incentives for renewal of poor trading local/ neighbourhood centres + performance criteria for expansion of larger centres Criteria to guide Council decisions to “upzone” centres (eg Doubleview NC to DC)? Retail trends - large format retail in Industry zones (24% retail floorspace)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 19 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // HOUSING STRATEGY (2010)

FOCUS AREAS: 1. Housing matched to community need 2. Affordable housing supply 3. Sustainable building forms 4. Housing accessible to local jobs / transport 5. Housing resilient to climate change/utility cost increases 6. Well designed infill housing

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 20 PART ONE LOCAL STRATEGIES

CITY OF STIRLING // HOUSING STRATEGY (2010)

ISSUES FOR SCHEME ‘Backyard Infill’ - R40 coded areas: loss of urban trees poor built form/streetscapes land fragmentation loss of family areas MD/GD crossover

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 21 PART ONE STRATEGIC CONTEXT

ALIGNMENT BETWEEN WAPC + COS STRATEGIC DIRECTION?

Activity Corridors + Centres Activity Corridor & Centre   locations (eg Mt Lawley & heritage constraints) Local job creation Transport infrastructure   priorities  Green networks  Industrial land transitioning  Housing diversity  Integrated transport

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 22 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK SPPs to be read as part of the Scheme unless modified by Scheme

!201000166GG! !200900211GG!

WESTERN 4135 WESTERN 4687 State Planning Policy 3.1 Residential Design Codes AUSTRALIAN AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT

ISSN 1448-949X PRINT POST APPROVED PP665002/00041 ISSN 1448-949X PRINT POST APPROVED PP665002/00041 State Planning Policy 3.1 PERTH, TUESDAY, 31 AUGUST 2010 No. 166 SPECIAL PERTH, FRIDAY, 20 NOVEMBER 2009 No. 211 SPECIAL Residential Design Codes PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY JOHN A. STRIJK, GOVERNMENT PRINTER AT 3.00 PM PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY JOHN A. STRIJK, GOVERNMENT PRINTER AT 3.45 PM © STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA © STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Prepared under section 26 of the STATE PLANNING Planning and Development Act 2005 by the Western Australian Planning Commission.

Replaces State Planning Policy 3.1 as published POLICY 7 in the Government Gazette on 22 November 2010 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005 and 29 April 2008.

______Disclaimer © State of Western Australia Published by the This document has been published by the DESIGN OF THE BUILT Department of Planning Department of Planning on behalf of the Gordon Stephenson House Western Australian Planning Commission. Any 140 William Street representation, statement, opinion or advice Perth WA 6000 'HSDUWPHQWRI expressed or implied in this publication is made in STATE PLANNING POLICY 4.2 STATE PLANNING POLICY 3.6 3ODQQLQJ good faith and on the basis that the government, Locked Bag 2506 its employees and agents are not liable for any Perth WA 6001 ENVIRONMENT damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a Published August 2013 result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, website: www.planning.wa.gov.au DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional email: [email protected] advice should be obtained before applying the FOR INFRASTRUCTURE information contained in this document to particular tel: 08 6551 9000 circumstances. fax: 08 6551 9001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR PERTH Draft for public comment infoline: 1800 626 477 This document is available in alternative formats AND PEEL on application to Communication Services. October 2016 ———————————

PREPARED UNDER SECTION 26 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005 BY THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION.

For a Better Built Environment

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 23 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 3 URBAN GROWTH AND 3.1 R-CODES

POLICY OVERVIEW COS FRAMEWORK - ALIGNMENT WITH SPP

Sustainable development patterns Scheme / LPS Aims consistent with Prioritises infill in established urban Policy areas Outcomes however delivering Housing diversity + choice scattered, less sustainable infill Higher densities in the most Stirling LPS aims to refocus infill efforts accessible locations to centres, high frequency public Implemented through further transport nodes + corridors – zoning related SPPs (R-Codes, Developer and incentivising provisions to reflect Contributions, Activity Centres) this.

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 24 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 3 URBAN GROWTH AND 3.1 R-CODES

POLICY OVERVIEW COS FRAMEWORK - ALIGNMENT WITH SPP

R-Codes alone not delivering good Scheme & LDPs/LPPs required to address deficiencies / fill built form outcomes the gaps Key issues - excessive lot coverage Currently no incentive for other building types (missing and variations to setbacks - result in middle) - look for other building typologies (grouped over development housing not delivering good outcomes) Currently no incentives for building Cl.5.3.4 promotes R40 multiple dwellings to consolidated types that support quality streetscapes near centres/corridors/transport interchanges (review if Watching brief – new suite of controls clause required in lieu of SPP 7 + Apartment Guidelines) through SPP 7 Additional provisions that address building frontages, access/car parking, tree retention/landscaping and retention of neighbourhood character (if not addressed through proposed SPP 7)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 25 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 7 - DESIGN WA + APARTMENT DESIGN (DRAFT)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 26 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 7 - DESIGN WA + APARTMENT DESIGN (DRAFT)

POLICY OVERVIEW COS FRAMEWORK - ALIGNMENT WITH SPP

Design WA - design-led policy SPP 7 consistent with strategic direction of Stirling in LPS for development to be context to promote good design across driven - provides universal design principles to provide consistency to industry. all forms of development Apartment Guide: Incorporates 10 principles • guidance for siting and orientation of apartments into existing neighbourhoods – of good design – context + may negate need for cl.5.4.3 to control locations of R40 multiple dwellings character; landscape quality; • use of Attached vs Detached – differentiation may create implementation issues sustainability; functionality; (use other place based organising principle?) build quality; amenity; • focus on existing character & not future character legibility; built form; scale and • other controls including Plot Ratio should be reviewed to ensure higher densities aesthetics. can be achieved without variations Design review: • Possible opportunities to incorporate framework in Scheme for pre-lodgement design review outside or concurrent with JDAP process.

Other suite of documents may provide useful controls for infill / coordinated precinct-based development, however these are yet to be released.

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 27 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 4.2 ACTIVITY CENTRES

STRATEGIC METRO SECONDARY CENTRES DISTRICT CENTRES NEIGHBOURHOOD + CENTRES (2) (9) LOCAL CENTRES (1) (32)

Stirling City Centre Karrinyup approved Shopping Centres Retail floorspace up to “Perth’s second CBD” - 37,127m2 retail + Main Street (Dog 4,000m2 Approved Westfield expansion (+ other Swamp Shopping Strong competitions Expansion (+33,600m2 uses) Centre, Beaufort from large centres / shop) Mirrabooka Street) convenience stores Draft Activity Centre undergoing Generally 10,000m2+ Plan aligned with redevelopment retail floorspace incl. SPP.4.2 – approx. 1,500 major supermarket dwellings & mixed- use main-street Draft Mirrabooka Activity Centre Plan aligned with SPP 4.2

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 28 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 4.2 ACTIVITY CENTRES

STRATEGIC SECONDARY DISTRICT

DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOOD LOCAL

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 29 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 4.2 ACTIVITY CENTRES

STRATEGIC + DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOOD SECONDARY + LOCAL Most performing well Form of development with some growth Centres in affluent inconsistent with SPP 4.2 potential (additional suburbs - strongest Retail focus / dispersed 5,000m2+ retail) performers. uses / car dependent Inglewood - under Strategies to support / enclosed shopping performing/ high poor performers centres vacancy rates Strongly linked to Strong enforcement of neighbourhood standards required liveability Potential for new Centres where under supply of convenience retail / significant infill planned

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 30 PART ONE METROPOLITAN POLICIES

STATE POLICY FRAMEWORK // SPP 3.6 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS

POLICY OVERVIEW COS FRAMEWORK - ALIGNMENT WITH SPP

Revised SPP 3.6 currently being advertised. Scheme provisions consistent with Content similar to 2009 version - new framework metropolitan strategic framework. broadens scope of contributions to incorporate SPP variations may need to be infrastructure required to deliver ‘Liveability’ considered to effectively deliver infill. Implementation - Model Provisions, Deemed Provisions Opportunities for alternative Aimed at Greenfield development - does not specifically development infrastructure contribution deal with incremental infill growth (challenge of applying mechanism for infill infrastructure? (per a per dwelling levy across extensive areas & address dwelling levy/ cash-in-lieu of parking / requirements to cost infrastructure/prepare audited POS cash-in-lieu) statements + consult regularly) May require coordinated precinct planning approach such as Better Suburbs & LDPs for Innaloo / Woodlands to enable DC to be applied (SPP 7 - Precinct Design)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 31 PART ONE SUMMARY

MATTERS FOR SCHEME REVIEW 1. Focus infill in Centres & Corridors 2. Extensive R40 areas - raise the bar/preserve family areas 3. Infrastructure - funding + timely provision 4. Urban tree canopy retention 5. Revitalisation of Local/Neighbourhood Centres

6. Built form control - promote preferred house INCLUDE IMAGE typologies / streetscape focus

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 32 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 33 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES

AGE PROFILE COMPARISON

COS AGE PROFILE COS HAS LOWER COS HAS HIGHER BETWEEN PROPORTION OF PROPORTION OF 2001 - 2011 PEOPLE AGED 0-14 PEOPLE AGED OVER RELATIVELY YEARS COMPARED 75 YEARS THAN UNCHANGED TO GREATER PERTH GREATER PERTH SINGLES COUPLES WITH NO CHILDREN

ABS, 2011 STIRLING PERTH HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 2001 2011

FAMILY

SINGLE PROPORTION OF (LONE) FAMILY HOUSEHOLD 0-14 15-29 30-44 45-59 60-74 75+ GREW 2001 - 2011

GROUPED ABS, 2011 ABS, 2011

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 34 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

SCHEME AMENDMENTS Most Amdts prompted by external proponents Some Amdts addressed deficiencies in SCHEME GAZETTED (44) Scheme - Amdt 32 - Multiple Dwellings, AMENDMENT REFUSED (12) SNAPSHOT NOT PURSUED (3) Amdt 4 + 27 - Heritage, Amdt 84 + 85 - SP 2010 - 2016 PENDING (26) provisions into LPS 3 Most rezonings (60%) involve residential density uplift (corridor/centre locations where largest density uplifts supported) Reasons for refusals – ad-hoc zoning change SCHEME REZONINGS (33) deemed unnecessary AMENDMENT TEXT CHANGES (11) TYPE deemed inconsistent with SPP 2010 - 2016 (R-Codes)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 35 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

INSTRUMENTS ADOPTED UNDER LPS 3

STIRLING CITY CENTRE

City of Stirling draft Stirlingcitycentre

structure plan STIRLING CITY CENTRE Local Planning Scheme No. 3

As adopted by Council

LOCAL PLANNING POLICY MANUAL 9 December 2014

Adopted 10 August 2010 Woodlands Precinct

Updated 1 November 2016 Draft Detailed Area Plan

Woodlands Detailed Area Plan 1

Innaloo Precinct

Detailed Area Plan

As Adopted by Council on 16 June 2015

Local Planning Policies Structure Plans Local Development Plans

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 36 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

STRUCTURE PLANS

APPROVED SPs UNDETERMINED SPs UNDETERMINED SPs NORMALISE IN SCHEME NORMALISE ONCE APPROVED / ISSUES FOR NORMALISATION IMPLEMENTED

Roselea, Stirling Channel 9 Site, Dianella Land use permissibilities / land Princeton, Stirling Lot 2 North Beach Road, Gwelup classifications not aligned with ECU, Churchlands Atlas Site, Mirrabooka Scheme: Carine TAFE, Carine Channel Ten & DoH Land, Stirling City Centre David Buttfield, Gwelup Dianella Mirrabooka Town Centre Eyrean Way, Gwelup Herdsman-Glendalough Daviot Park, Gwelup Thomas Mews Estate, Gwelup

MATTERS FOR SCHEME REVIEW Elevate SP provisions into Scheme - response to ‘due regard’ principle of Regs Duplicity between Scheme & SP controls

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 37 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS Growing need for design control for infill (impact of SPP.7 suite of instruments) LDPs + LPPs performing similar functions Wide-ranging formats - individual lot plans to precinct-based codes Progressive - public / private realm standards Consistent approach / template needed Performance audits – are design outcomes better?

New housing development in Innaloo (adopted LDP)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 38 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES ACTIONACTION_REVIEW - REVIEW + STREAMLINE + STREAMLINE 45 1. Revoke outdated / rarely used_ renewable energy POLICIES satellite dishes 2. Consolidate policies covering common issues_ residential with streetscape policies parking + access with bike parking 3. Identify standards to be elevated into Scheme or reassigned to policy parking built form advertising signage 4. Revoke residential estate policies once development delivered 5. Review policies in context of SPP 7 (including draft LDP 2.9)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 39 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

DEVELOPMENT IN STIRLING

CITY OF STIRLING LPS 3 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS

SINGLE GROUPED MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS DWELLINGS 3,411 2,402 2,709 2,383 2,080

MIXED USE / INDUSTRIAL CIVIC 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 COMMERCIAL

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 40 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS 2014 - 2016* Scattered infill, mostly across R40 coded areas Impact on suburb amenity + liveability

* INCLUDES ALL RESIDENTIAL

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 41 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

SINGLE HOUSE BUILDING PERMITS 2014 - 2016

1,070 SINGLE DWELLINGS

SINGLE DWELLINGS

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 42 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

SINGLE HOUSE

STONER ST, SCARBOROUGH BOURKE STREET, YOKINE REDCLIFF AVE, MIRRABOOKA

FRONTAGES DARK ROOF DOMINATED BY GARAGES NO EAVES / SHADING WIDE POOR DEVICES CROSSOVER STREET ENGAGEMENT

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 43 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

GROUPED HOUSING BUILDING PERMITS 2014 - 2016

BUILDING PERMITS 511 1,438 PERMITS DWELLINGS

GROUPED DWELLINGS

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 44 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

GROUPED HOUSING Design Issues

1. Site coverage + hardstand areas – impact

on courtyards/landscaping ORNUM PLACE, KARRINYUP ODIN ROAD, INNALOO 2. Garages + extensive hardstand to streets 3. Poor street engagement - openings + verandahs, street walls/fences 4. Building mass - large houses or units? 5. Elevations - materials, proportions, articulation REGENT STREET, INNALOO ALBERT STREET, BALCATTA 6. Impact on ‘next door’ - bulk, privacy + overshadowing 7. Services / bin storage to streets 8. Tree loss

STEDHAM WAY, BALGA NORTH BEACH RD, NORTH BEACH

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 45 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

GROUPED HOUSING // SIDE BY SIDE Design Issues

1. Garages to street DUKE ST, SCARBOROUGH CAPE ST, YOKINE 2. Wide crossovers / no street trees 3. Orientation - loss of natural light 4. Elevations - materials, proportions, articulation, parapet walls

5. Building mass - discord with street CAPE ST, YOKINE MOULDEN AVE, YOKINE character 6. Services / bin storage to streets

NORTH BEACH RD, NORTH BEACH BURNISTON ST, SCARBOROUGH

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 46 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

GROUPED HOUSING // RETAINED HOUSE Design Issues

1. Poor upgrades to retained house 2. Design / courtyards compromised

NOTE! PLAN NOT TO SCALE ON A3 3. IrregularUNIT 1 lots + dwelling forms colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch CL 59c 56c 56c CL 59c CL 59c colorbond 56c roof @ 18° second boxed and lined pitch render eaves @ 56c flashing as req'd 2,400 2,400 colour 41c

2,400 2,400 colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch flashing as req'd second render 41c CL 31c 4. Designflashing as req'd colour integration - old + new colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch 31c 31c 172

first render colour 30c 257 CL 31c CL 31c CL 28c 3cH slab 31c b'wk n t'bar beyond @ 25c 2cH slab 172 257 CL 28c selected infills over selected lugged shelf lintel @ 25c CL 29c 820 gate 25c alum hi-light 23c inst. 2,486

remote control hwu 2,400

elec sectional door 1,770 2,485 2,400 gas / 1,849 meterbox driveway @ ( approx ) natural ground line @ boundary 9c grano @ -1c FL 00c approx 9.50 9 .9 5 9 .8 4 FL 00c -2c 9 .4 3 649 b'paved steps ( approx ) second render colour FL 00c 9 .8 5 9 .8 0 (FFL 9.70) FGL 9.186 -4c FGL 9.186 slope up .2 1 -6c 9 T.O.F @ -7c FRONT ELEVATION (1) UNIT 1 natural ground line @ boundary 1:100 REAR ELEVATION (3) UNIT 1 1:100 DANMAR Registered Builder No Builder Registered Tel colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch P.O. ( Level 08 ) CL 59c , 1814 , Box 9445 boxed and lined 56c

1/ boxed and lined www . eaves @ 56c Osborne Park WA WA Park Osborne

470 second Scale as shown shown on as Scale hi-light window eaves @ 56c colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch 7833 Floor plan all plan Floor render danmarhomes .com

Scarborough Beach Road Beach Scarborough colour Osborne Park DC WA DC Park Osborne

2,400 CL 59c

HOMES flashing as req'd obscured UNIT 1 41c 57c 1,769

. . FFL 9.70 UNIT 3 boxed and lined 9032 colorbond roof @ 18° pitch CL 31c 34c FFL 8.40 eaves @ 56c 3cH slab 31c 38 059 497 773 497 059 ABN 38 exposed beam 257 Fax Fax flashing as req'd CL 28c 2,400

6017 selected infills over ( A2

08 ) 23c colorbond roof @ 18° pitch 31cH parapet wall w/- squareline gutter colorbond roof @ 20° pitch gas/elec CL 31c 9445 7933 9445 set 20mm from boundary inst. hwu meterbox UNIT 2 EXISTING 31c 32c

28c 257

6916 (2cH face laid 3rd bond)

2,400 CL 28c 1,832 PROPOSED CARPORT UNIT 2 9c PROPOSED U1 SHED U2 SHED 32cH parapet wall w/- squareline gutter 632 9 .8 4 STEPS set 20mm from boundary FL 00c FFL 9.70 UNIT 1 820 -2c FFL 9.47 UNIT 2 mf (2cH face laid 3rd bond) 2 1 -4c 230 EXISTING STEPS 2,400 Proposed residence Proposed 9 . -6c new panel and post Lot No: For FFL 8.572 retaining top @ 8.30 SIDE ELEVATION (2) UNIT 1 T.O.F @ -8c UNIT 2 C/YARD 8 .3 9 House type .0 0 7 1 1:100 9 .8 0 8 . FFL 8.40 UNIT 3 FL 00c : natural ground line @ boundary 8 FFL 8.314 UNIT 3 C/YARD

.9 5 SIDE ELEVATION (2) CARPORT -5c T.O.F @ -5c 7 1:100 SIDE ELEVATION (2) UNIT 3 Balga Fernhurst Crescent 585 #8 DELANEY

NOTE! COURSE HEIGHTS ARE RELATIVE TO EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch boxed and lined boxed and lined eaves @ 56c : eaves @ 56c NOTE! COURSE HEIGHTS ARE RELATIVE TO EACH CL 59c INDIVIDUAL UNIT UNIT 2 EXISTING 56c 56c

Units boxed and lined colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch hi-light window hi-light window eaves @ 56c UNIT 1 FFL 9.70

CL 59c 2,425 flashing as req'd

56c 1,769 1,769 UNIT 3 UNIT 2 NEW CARPORT colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch second render colour CL 31c FFL 8.40 V joint to separate 31c

'd 257 2,425 render colours colorbond CL 28c selected infills over flashing as req V joint to separate 39c roof @ 20° 23c pitch CL 31c exposed beam render colours 20c

257 29c 28c only and should only diagramatic are elevations & All plans finish. plastering not allow do measurements Brick Note sizes. exact scale to not be used CL 28c 28c second render colour 1800H fencing 2,400 PROPOSED CARPORT UNIT 2 25c 9c : b'wk on lugged 820 NOTE! COURSE HEIGHTS 7c TF shelf lintel @ 25c 9 .8 3 ARE RELATIVE TO CARPORT FFL 9.70 UNIT 1 RL 9.60 FL 00c

elec @ 00c

for EXISTING FFL 9.47 UNIT 2 remote control RL 9.30 slope down 2,400 @ -2c

gas / slope down meterbox sectional door b'paved RL 9.00 4 3 FFL 8.572 UNIT 2 RL 8.80 9 . T.O.F @ -7c Builder Date Client Final Plans Contract - below noted as the documents part of plan forms This (8.572) slope down RL 8.572 grano @ -1c (8.314) CARPORT FL 00c RL 8.30 8 .9 9

: slope up /s: : footings @ same level -2c 8 .7 8 DRIVEWAY ELEVATION (4) UNIT 1 .1 7 8 .3 8 8 1:100 - DRIVEWAY ELEVATION (4) UNIT 3 CARPORT ELEVATION (4) UNIT 3 CITY 1:100 OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY 1:100 BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 47 colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch V/ONo. Variations . #VO No #VO CL 59c 56c 56c colorbond roof @ 25°38' pitch boxed and lined hi-light eaves @ 56c colorbond aa - bb 2008 Date 56c 2,425 roof @ 18°

pitch flashing as req'd 1,684 / Dwn hi-light window line of Unit 2 carport CL 31c .

2,425 31c flashing as req 257 CL 28c 28c

1,684 flashing as req'd . Chkd

AA 39c colorbond roof @ 18° pitch 'd colorbond roof @ 18° pitch

32c 31c hi-light hi-light 820 257 inst alum gas/elec LY Drawn 27 Date Current No Job Sheet 3 28c t'bar @ 25c

2,400 hwu meterbox C 25c 32cH parapet wall w/- squareline gutter set on strata boundary 820 1,685 1,685 new panel and post (2cH face laid 3rd bond) MF retaining top @ 8.30 15 / Date FL 00c copyright gas/ elec 8 .1 7

2,400 meterbox 07 - 77 9875 : step down into courtyard 8 . 7 . 7 7 of 6 8 / 8 . 3 9 16 8 .6 2 FFL of Unit 2 Carport 8.572 8 0 8 0 7 . natural ground line @ boundary 7 . 5 / / 07 BHD Chkd 2016 natural ground line @ SIDE ELEVATION (6) UNIT 3 REAR ELEVATION (5) UNIT 3

. strata boundary 1:100 1:100 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDING PERMITS 2014 - 2016 Amendment 32 allowed CoS to curb ad-hoc multiple dwellings masquerading as grouped housing across R40 areas

BUILDING PERMITS 97 712 PERMITS DWELLINGS

MD PRIOR TO AMDT 32 (445DW) MD POST AMDT 32 (267DW)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 48 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

MULTIPLE DWELLINGS // SMALL COMPLEXES Design Issues

1. Yield controlled by parking - parking + amenity HELLEY ST, KARRINYUP HASTINGS ST, SCARBOROUGH issues (Amdt 33 R60 parking) 2. Poor street engagement - openings + verandahs, street walls/fences 3. Building mass - large houses or apartments? 4. Site coverage + hardstand areas – impact on courtyards/landscaping FILBURN STREET, SCARBOROUGH BURNISTON STREET, SCARBOROUGH 5. Extensive parapet walls 6. Poor design responses to privacy 7. Impact on ‘next door’ - bulk, privacy + overshadowing

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 49 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

MULIPLE DWELLINGS // HIGH RISE Design Issues

1. Streetscape interface - sloping sites (calc. of natural ground level) 2. Inadequate opps. for deep planting (basement setbacks) 3. Opportunity to negotiate public benefit from major development 4. Implications of SPP 7 - design quality

HASTINGS ST, SCARBOROUGH

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 50 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

SINGLE OCCUPANCY, ANCILLARY + AGED BUILDING PERMITS 2014 - 2016 Single occupancy + aged accommodation not focused in centres / corridors Community objections to aged accommodation proposals – are concerns validated? 30 5 316 PERMITS PERMITS PERMITS

ANCILLARY AGED SINGLE OCCUPANCY

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 51 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

HOUSING // ISSUES FOR SCHEME REVIEW

New initiatives: Respond to WAPC ‘s Design WA (SPP Community certainty: Prescribe standards for what 7) + Better Suburbs recommendations CoS/communities want to see rather than what they don’t want (more illustrative)

Design standards: address any shortcomings of Dwelling retention: Revisit ability to retain house as SPP 7 (incl. R-Codes) - SPP variations, supplementary part of grouped housing redevelopment controls + design codes for strategic corridors/ centres

Building types: Encourage building types that R40 areas: review coding to discourage scattered + support quality streetscapes (eg. low/mid- poor quality infill - split coding / tighter rise apartments, terraces, courtyard houses, maisonettes) + discourage those that don’t (grouped dwellings, front loaded side-by-side)

Height: review calculation of building height (LPP 2.6) Public benefit: mechanisms in Scheme to allow to circumvent walling to street frontages dev. incentives in return for public benefit offer (POS, public art, streetscape, civic areas, ground floor activation)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 52 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

COMMERCIAL/MIXED USE Planning/ Design Issues

1. Balance between prescription +

performance based (compliant BEAUFORT ST (CNR SEVENTH AVE) ELLEN STIRLING BLVD, STIRLING developments not always delivering - Aldi on Beaufort Street) 2. Podium developments to reduce impact of height but often poor results –parking occupying lower levels or insufficient variance in tower / podium setbacks & SELBY ST, CHURCHLANDS SELBY ST, CHURCHLANDS design distinction 3. Desire for residential / commercial mix - mandatory residential for centres/ corridor mixed-use buildings & ability to transfer

OSBORNE PARK OSBORNE PARK

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 53 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

JDAP 94 DETERMINED APPLICATIONS (2012 - July 2016)

COMMERCIAL EDUCATION HEALTH CARE MIXED USE OFFICE RESIDENTIAL RETIREMENT

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 54 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

JDAP

REFUSED OBSERVATIONS JDAP / SAT DETERMINATION 6 APPROVED JDAP departing from RAR where planning WITHDRAWN 80 8 framework not finalised (Beaufort Street Activity REFUSED Corridor - heights) 8 Larger projects consolidating in centres, corridors & industrial areas MATTERS FOR SCHEME REVIEW: 102 JDAP APPLICATIONS Reassign provisions to Scheme to curb unintended built form outcomes/variations (eg building height 2012-16 controls for Activity Corridors) Review operation of Clause 5.5.1 – consider specifying clauses to which discretion to vary applies

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 55 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

CHANGE OF USE

SPECIFIC ISSUES: OBSERVATIONS: 1. Private Recreation in mixed business 1. 69 change of use applications (26/8/15 - areas – fails to support activity centres 30/6/16) - approx 7 per month 2. Home Office / Home Business / Home 2. Of these: Occupation – simplify categories / DA 22% Private Recreation (many locating exemption for compliant uses in industrial / mixed business areas) 3. Large format retail in mixed business 7% Family Day Care (proposed Amdt areas – significant retail locating outside 82 exempt approval req.) activity centres (Scheme accommodate 7% personal care services by adopting Model defn or tighten (accommodate in Shop defn?) provisions?) 4. B&B defn restrictive in requiring serving of breakfast. Applications for short-stay on rise with Airbnb, Stayz

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 56 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

CHANGE OF USE_ MATTERS FOR SCHEME 1. Opportunity to bring some use classes + defs into line with Model Provisions 2. Modify definitions causing confusion in change-of-use applications 3. Simplify use classes into broader functional categories / align with parking standards 4. Respond to trends: personal care services large format retail in mixed business areas private recreation in mixed business areas rise of short stay accom home-based work

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 57 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

APPEAL SAT REVIEW UPHELD BY SAT 7 APPEALS

APPEAL COMMONLY CONTESTED DISMISSED BY SAT 8 APPEALS −− (13) Heritage protection −− (13) R-Code standards −− (10) Residential CP −− (9) Building height limits −− (5) Parking stands. / shortfall −− (5) Discretional Uses SAT (2013 - 2016)

APPEALS WHERE COS POSITION 76 APPEALS OVERTURNED BY SAT: −− Heritage - demolition refusal −− Building height Main St (2-storey) −− Non compliant front fence (sight lines) −− Shop Addition (butcher) - parking shortage DETERMINED S.31 RECONSIDERATION / MEDIATED / WITHDRAWN 61 APPEALS

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 58 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

SAT REVIEW

MATTERS FOR SCHEME REVIEW Reassign certain discretional standards to Scheme −−heritage protection (proposed Amdt 76) −−residential car parking −−building height controls

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 59 PART TWO LPS 3 ACTIVITY SNAPSHOT

CITY OF STIRLING FREEHOLD + SURVEY SUBDIVISION STRATA LOT CREATION (2012 - 2016) WAPC approval of irregular lots - 350 facilitates retention of dwellings / poor 300 built outcome 250 Subdivision in heritage protection areas 200

150

100

0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 AVERAGE LOT CREATION / YEAR 250 LOTS

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 60 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 61 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

PLANNING REGULATIONS DETAILEDDEEMED ASSESSMENT PROVISIONS UNDERTAKEN Deemed Provisions to be inserted into Scheme - standalone document Early amendment or address through Scheme Review? MODEL PROVISIONS

Current Scheme based on MST / reasonably consistent Assessment undertaken to identify Model Provisions appropriate for new Scheme and those that may be problematic CoS Raised Number of Issues re: deficiencies with Model Provisions

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 62 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

SCHEME AIMS (CL.1.6)

Revisit Scheme Aims to To provide for convenient To provide for a range To assist employment attractive and viable align with LPS. of housing choice in & economic growth by commercial centres, neighbourhoods with a facilitating the timely which service the needs Give aims greater clarity + strong community identity provision of suitable land of the community and are and high levels of amenity. for retail, commercial, focus by including a set of accessible to pedestrians, industrial, entertainment cyclists and public transport aims for each LPS theme & tourist developments, users as well as motorists. as well as providing Determine how success will opportunities for home be measured based employment.

To protect and enhance the To encourage the To assist in the effective environmental values and conservation and continued implementation of regional natural resources of the use of identified places and plans and policies including local government area and objects of cultural heritage the State Planning Strategy to promote sustainable significance land use and development

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 63 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

SCHEME ZONES

ZONE COMMENT ALIGNMENT WITH MODEL PROVISIONS (MP) Development Zone Purpose important for infill sites (Regs doesn’t provide). MP equivalent ‘Urban Development’ - pitched to greenfield sites Duplicity - Development Contribution / Special Control Areas Local Centre Review against SPP 4.2 (zone for centre type) Centre Zone closest MP equivalent District Centre Review against SPP 4.2 (zone for centre type) Centre Zone closest MP equivalent Regional Centre Review against SPP 4.2 (zone for centre type) Centre Zone closest MP equivalent Residential Not achieving infill aligned with State / CoS strategies Residential – MP equivalent Consider 2 x residential zones –‘Urban’ and ‘Suburban’ Business Zone Useful zone - allows small offices in residential areas No MP equivalent Mixed Use Mixed Use - effective for mandating residential MP equivalent – Mixed Use, however residential not mandated Suitable zone for Activity Corridors/ frame areas to Activity Centres (potential to become business precincts) Mixed Business Large format shops (non-compliant) locating in zone (impact on Service Commercial closest MP equivalent. activity centres). ‘Retail Establishment’ def. not helping? Industry Zoning requires review to accom. transitioning of these areas MP Light Industry Hotel Single use class zone - Substitute with Tourism Zone? (preserve MP Tourist Zone more expansive objectives (aligned LPS) tourist accommodation) Private Institutions Broad land use permissibility concern to Council (eg. aged accom. & Private clubs, institutions and place of worship zone – MP equivalent lack of built form guidance, including height) Review zone to determine if greater controls / policy needed Civic Restrictive Zone – Mostly CoS owned sites Nearest MP equivalent is ‘Civic & Community’ reserve (uses however Used to preserve parking for local/neighbourhood centres. often private sector / not-for-profit – is a zone the better option?) Consider alternatives to secure parking whilst enabling redevelopment Service Station Single use class zone - remove if development standards sufficient No equivalent MP zone to control location / design (compatible with ‘urban’ corridors)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 64 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

ZONE OVERLAYS Special Control Areas introduced to avoid separate minor Schemes for specific areas - generally performed well. Risk of Special Control Areas being over- used / creating cumbersome Scheme - development standards/ land use controls should first & foremost relate to zones where practical Duplicity + complexity where separate Development Zones, Special Control Areas & Development Contributions Areas apply to same land area

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 65 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

RESERVES

LOCAL RESERVES Opportunity to further align local reserves with reserves of Model Provisions ADDITIONAL RESERVES Strategic response for planned population growth – active POS, transport, utilities, schools MRS Activity Corridors - a new category? ‘Green Connector Regional Road’

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 66 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS Mechanisms needed to fund infrastructure for infill_ DCs that are fair & simple to administer - flat per dwelling levy (no up-front infrastructure / annual reporting) Able to use contributions to fund public transport, streetscape enhancement, new parks (SPP 3.6 - Liveablity) Cash-in-lieu POS contribution for Form 24 – Built Strata (residential) Better use of Cash-in-lieu of parking provisions (less Council discretion to waive requirement)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 67 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESSES DA exemptions (Regs) for R-Code compliant single houses - issues of non-R-Code compliant residential building permit (requires review) Other exemptions to consider (subject to addressing criteria) - Change of use (Shop to Personal Care Services); Home Occupation & Home Business; Pre-lodgement Design Review - Allow officers to negotiate better design outcomes before design fully resolved by proponent

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 68 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

COMPLIANCE Compliance issues brought to City’s attention usually emanate from complaints. Many more unaccounted for. No significant issues with LPS 3 provisions + available powers – key issue is volume of non-compliance with compliance team growing significantly. Non-compliance issues can be very minor but time consuming Common areas of non-compliance: Non-compliance with planning conditions / approved plans No planning approval – illegal development (including change of use that results in parking issues eg. Yelo Café) Front fencing - sight-line truncations, height + permeable infill (linked to building typology issues)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 69 PART THREE SCHEME PERFORMANCE

COMPLIANCE

Matters for Scheme Review: Additional provision in Scheme to confirm DA required for unlawful use - pressure often to continue use while resolving non-compliance & difficulty of formally stopping activity Supplementary provisions to discourage retrospective approval (Regs Deemed Provisions legitimises this avenue) Compliance team to audit areas of non-compliance / resourcing requirements & outcomes. Use info. to enable greater focus on results & to ensure resources are most effectively directed Greater capacity for a more proactive approach to common non-compliance issues. Is non-compliance a real concern or can Scheme / policy provisions be adjusted to be more permissive? Think freely – can some standards that are frequently referred to Compliance Team be revisited (eg truncation & sight line standard review study? Grouping of land use categories for greater flexibility?)

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 70 PART FOUR EMERGING ISSUES FOR THE CITY

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 71 PART FOUR EMERGING ISSUES

EMERGING ISSUES

ENVIRONMENT ACCESS COMMUNITY climate change - mitigation & adaptation Integrated transportation Social infrastructure emergency management - bushfires, flooding Active Transport Cultural heritage environmental management / biodiversity Freight routes Public health/wellbeing conservation Managed Car Parking Safety/ CPTED energy efficiency water resource management urban tree loss

HEALTH HOUSING ECONOMY Mental Health Supply matched to need Job creation/retention Walkable Streets Design quality Infrastructure + Services (funding / delivery Adequacy POS standards Afford-ability mechanisms) Well located infill/ meeting targets New millennium workplace

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 72 PART FIVE NEXT STEPS

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 73 PART FIVE NEXT STEPS

WORK PACKAGE 1

TASK TIMEFRAME Incorporate CoS / DoP Comments into Background Analysis Dec 2016 Performance Assessment Criteria Jan – Feb 2017 Meeting CoS / DoP – Performance Criteria Assessment Results Feb 2017 Stakeholder Consultation # 1 March 2017

Meeting CoS / DoP – Draft Options April 2017 Stakeholder Consultation # 2 May 2017 Meeting CoS / DoP – Project Review (prior to commencing Work Package 2) June 2017

Work Package 2 (2017 - 18 Financial Year) – Preparation of Scheme Review Report

CITY OF STIRLING PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 74