DOCSLIB.ORG

CHAPTER 12 IMPACT of EXTRATERRESTRIAL OBJECTS.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHAPTER 12 IMPACT of EXTRATERRESTRIAL OBJECTS.Pdf Environmental Geology CHAPTER 12 IMPACT OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL OBJECTS • Case History: The Tunguska Event - Aerial Blast & Largest Impact Event in recorded human history. On June 30, 1908, blue-white fireball exploded over Tunguska River Valley with the blasting force of 10 megatons oF TNT, 10 H- bombs. It leFt NO impact crater. Estimated size oF the asteroid 20–50 m in diameter. 2000 km2 of forest flattened and burned. At least 1,000,000-km2 area heard the explosion. Loss oF lives in millions iF it had occurred over a major city. It could happen again; We narrowly missed a similar hit in 2004. • Asteroids - Size: Ranging From 10 m (32 Ft) to 1000 km (621 mi). They are composed oF rocky or metallic material, or rock–metal mixtures. Most oF them are located in asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Some cross Earth’s orbit due to the collision of asteroids. • Comets - Originate From the Oort Cloud, deep in the solar system, about 50,000 times the distance between Earth and the Sun; many are in the Kuiper Belt. They sometimes intersect Earth’s orbit. Size: Ranging From a Few meters to a Few hundred kilometers. Composition: A rocky core surrounded by ice and covered by carbon-rich dust. The “ice” may be water ice, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, ammonia. The “dust” is silicate minerals, metallic iron and nickel specks, and carbon compounds. Earth’s water is thought to have come mostly from comets • Meteoroids – Meteors – Meteorites : Origin: Small, Fragmented rocky, icy or carbonaceous space particles from the disintegration of asteroids. Size: Ranging From dust-size to a Few meters. They are called Meteoroids when they are in space. Meteors are burning meteoroids due to Frictional heat From their entrance to Earth’s atmosphere. A meteor shower is a large number oF meteors. They are called meteorites when they are found on Earth’s surFace. • Early Evolution of the Earth - Since Earth Formed it has been bombarded by meteoroids, asteroids, or comets (MACs). Impact oF the MACs contributed to the Formation and makeup oF Earth. Earth’s evolution greatly afFected by the impacts—both destruction and construction eFFects. It is by accretion, or “sweeping up” oF space debris, via impacts, that Earth is thought to have grown From the nebula in the First place. • Impact Craters and Erosion - IF an impact hits the surFace at “hypervelocity” (i.e., it is still moving kms/sec), it will produce an explosion crater, known as an impact crater. Meteoroids/comets enter Earth’s atmosphere with velocities oF 12 to 72 km/sec! Most impact craters on Earth destroyed (erased) by tectonics, erosion and volcanism • The Moon-There are many obvious impact craters on the moon- retained for billions oF years . Impact cratering was initially intense, but has dropped to a much lower Frequency over the past 3.8 billion years or so. The Moon has no atmosphere and craters are not eroded and signiFicant volcanism ended over 3 billion years ago and tectonism/Faulting appears to have been a very minor process on the Moon. • Aerial Bursts and Impacts - MACs travels at high speed: 26,000 to 156,000 mph, and undergo remarkable changes when entering Earth’s atmosphere, causing aerial bursts in the atmosphere when disintegrated in the air, and direct impacts on collision with Earth. • Impact Craters-The most direct and obvious evidence oF extraterrestrial impacts. Earth has Few obvious impact craters (Meteor Crater in Arizona is the most Famous). Careful study has revealed the presence of over 150 impact structures, most oF which have been heavily eroded. • Impact cratering is one of the four basic types of geologic processes that occur on planets. Eosion,/gradation, volcanism, and tectonism are the other 3. • Meteors are almost instantly vaporized upon impact, as are some rocks (others melt). Intense pressures produce “shocked” minerals, distinctive to impact events (and nuclear blasts) and highly Fractured/brecciated rock layers beneath crater. Material in ground is compressed, then bounces back and flies out oF growing crater. Material thrown out oF crater is called ejecta and an ejecta blanket is layer oF Fragments produced by falling to Earth of ejecta around crater, which is thickest at rim and thins rapidly away From crater, and produces “inverted layering” with top layers thrown out and landing first, deeper layers excavated and landing later. • Barringer Impact Crater - 50,000-year-old Barringer Crater in Arizona, the most Famous meteor crater in the U.S. It is 1.2 km (.75 mi) in diameter and 590 ft in depth bowl-shaped depression with upraised ejection rim (850 Ft). It resulted From the impact oF a small asteroid, 25–100 m in diameter • Impact Craters • Craters involved with extremely high temp, velocity, and pressure; diFFerent From craters From other terrestrial geologic processes • Shock metamorphism: forming high-pressure modiFied minerals such as quartz or materials oF mixed partially melted rocks and impacting objects • Other associated processes: Vaporization, melting, and ejection oF materials • Happened before and likely to happen again • Barringer Crater and others on Earth • Remotely studied craters on the moon and Mars • Impact on Jupiter Ø Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 orbited Jupiter and became 21 Fragments Ø In 1994, the Family oF Fragmented “string oF pearls” entered Jupiter’s atmosphere and exploded Ø Energy released: Greater than that of the entire stockpile of nuclear weapons on Earth • Mass Extinction - Massive and sudden loss oF plants and animals relative to the number oF new species being added. Extinction-scale events occur every ~100 million years. Some (but not all) mass extinction events correspond in time with dated impact structures. Several hypotheses suggested: Rapid climate change, plate tectonics, extremely large volcanic events, and impacts of extraterrestrial objects. • Six major mass extinctions during the last 540 Million years • First: ~443 MYA, near end oF the Ordovician period, extinction oF 100 Families and associated species • Second: 350 MYA, near end oF the Devonian, death oF 70% oF all marine invertebrates • Third: 245 MYA, end oF the Permian Ø 95% oF all marine species Ø Possibly caused by more than a single catastrophe Ø Likely spanned for a 7-million-year period • Fourth & Most Famous: Around the K-T (Creatceous – Tertiary) boundary, 65 MYA Ø Resulting From a giant asteroid (diameter oF 10 km) impact in the vicinity of the Yucatan Peninsula Ø Louis and Walter Alvarez (1980) – Best evidence (short oF actual crater) was enhanced iridium in clay layer at boundary – No crater was identified at that time Ø Extinction of about 70% of all genera, such as dominant species oF dinosaurs Ø Setting stage For the evolution oF mammals, including humans • Chicxulub – Buried Impact Crater - Found in Yucatan of Mexico in 1991 – ~180 km diameter…. Formed at the K-T boundary • 10 km (6mi) diameter asteroid • 100 million megaton blast (10,000x entire world’s nuclear arsenal) • Dust in atmosphere / Acid rains / forest Fires • Mega-tsunami (3000 Ft high!) • Food chain collapsed • ~40 to 100 million year recurrence interval For event oF this size • Fifth: Mass extinction - Near end of the Eocene, 35 MYA Ø Likely resulted From cooling and glaciation Ø Recently linked to an impact event (Chesapeake Bay) • Sixth: Mass Extinction (last): Near end of the Pleistocene to present Ø Ongoing mass extinction oF mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds, Fish, and plants Ø Climate change Ø human activities Ø Pleistocene megaFauna extinctions and disappearance oF Clovis (human) culture – poss. link to an impact almost 13,000 years ago • Environmental Risk of Impacts - Depending upon both the probabilities and the consequences of the impacts. Ø Catastrophic impact risks: Aerial blasts or direct ground impact Ø Impact area: Regional or global scale, mass extinction Ø Smaller event about every 1000 years, and larger event to occur every few tens of thousands of years Ø Impact risks For humanity Ø Tunguska-like event every 1,000 years or so Ø With current city distribution, massive impact catastrophe should hit a city, on average, every few tens of thousands of years Ø Such an event could kill millions almost instantaneously – averages out to hundreds oF deaths/year, similar to storms and Floods in U.S. (our number one threat!) Ø Chicxulub-type event would likely wipe out humanity entirely Ø Sequence of Events – Catastrophic Impact Ø Est. relationship between energy oF impacts and Frequency oF events • Minimizing the Impact Hazard -Identify and Categorize: goal….to Identify all potentially hazardous near-Earth objects (NEOs) – including asteroids and space junk, like spent Apollo rocket stages, etc and categorize the comets and asteroids crossing Earth’s orbit • Spacewatch and NEAT - Spacewatch program, developed in 1981, has expanded its observations to the entire solar system. NEAT (near-earth asteroid tracking) system, support by NASA, Focuses on the size and distribution oF NEOs. • How many are out there? There are about 20 million NEOs, 4% with the ability to penetrate and excavate a crater; another 40% to penetrate the atmosphere and pose a threat. Extrapolations From sky surveys suggest there are about 1,500 objects oF 1 km or more in diameter are in Earth- crossing orbits. Around 135,000 Earth-crossing asteroids with a diameter oF 100 m or less. • Minimizing the Impact Hazard…… considerations and possibilities • Diverting Objects and Evacuation • Designing an approach to divert large objects away • Designing a plan For early evacuation For smaller impact events, iF precise location can be predicted • Comets have orbits that take them very Far From the Sun, and may cross Earth’s path • Such objects are far harder to predict/see and would give far less lead time to prepare and potentially nudge out oF Earth’s path WSE 8/2012 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cross-References ASTEROID IMPACT Definition and Introduction History of Impact Cratering Studies
    18 ASTEROID IMPACT Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., and Price, S. D., 2002. The identification and confirmation of impact structures on supplemental IRAS minor planet survey. The Astronomical Earth were developed: (a) crater morphology, (b) geo- 123 – Journal, , 1056 1085. physical anomalies, (c) evidence for shock metamor- Tholen, D. J., and Barucci, M. A., 1989. Asteroid taxonomy. In Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), phism, and (d) the presence of meteorites or geochemical Asteroids II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 298–315. evidence for traces of the meteoritic projectile – of which Yeomans, D., and Baalke, R., 2009. Near Earth Object Program. only (c) and (d) can provide confirming evidence. Remote Available from World Wide Web: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ sensing, including morphological observations, as well programs. as geophysical studies, cannot provide confirming evi- dence – which requires the study of actual rock samples. Cross-references Impacts influenced the geological and biological evolu- tion of our own planet; the best known example is the link Albedo between the 200-km-diameter Chicxulub impact structure Asteroid Impact Asteroid Impact Mitigation in Mexico and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Under- Asteroid Impact Prediction standing impact structures, their formation processes, Torino Scale and their consequences should be of interest not only to Earth and planetary scientists, but also to society in general. ASTEROID IMPACT History of impact cratering studies In the geological sciences, it has only recently been recog- Christian Koeberl nized how important the process of impact cratering is on Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria a planetary scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting and Avoiding Killer Asteroids
    Target Earth! Detecting and Avoiding Killer Asteroids by Trudy E. Bell (Copyright 2013 Trudy E. Bell) ARTH HAD NO warning. When a mountain- above 2000°C and triggering earthquakes and volcanoes sized asteroid struck at tens of kilometers (miles) around the globe. per second, supersonic shock waves radiated Ocean water suctioned from the shoreline and geysered outward through the planet, shock-heating rocks kilometers up into the air; relentless tsunamis surged e inland. At ground zero, nearly half the asteroid’s kinetic energy instantly turned to heat, vaporizing the projectile and forming a mammoth impact crater within minutes. It also vaporized vast volumes of Earth’s sedimentary rocks, releasing huge amounts of carbon dioxide and sulfur di- oxide into the atmosphere, along with heavy dust from both celestial and terrestrial rock. High-altitude At least 300,000 asteroids larger than 30 meters revolve around the sun in orbits that cross Earth’s. Most are not yet discovered. One may have Earth’s name written on it. What are engineers doing to guard our planet from destruction? winds swiftly spread dust and gases worldwide, blackening skies from equator to poles. For months, profound darkness blanketed the planet and global temperatures dropped, followed by intense warming and torrents of acid rain. From single-celled ocean plank- ton to the land’s grandest trees, pho- tosynthesizing plants died. Herbivores starved to death, as did the carnivores that fed upon them. Within about three years—the time it took for the mingled rock dust from asteroid and Earth to fall out of the atmosphere onto the ground—70 percent of species and entire genera on Earth perished forever in a worldwide mass extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Method an Investigation of Impact Craters
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Scientific Method: An Investigation of Impact Craters Recommended for Grades 5,6,7 www.nasa.gov Table of Contents Digital Learning Network (DLN) .................................................................................................... 3 Overview................................................................................................................................................. 3 National Standards............................................................................................................................. 4 Sequence of Events........................................................................................................................... 5 Videoconference Outline ................................................................................................................. 6 Videoconference Event .................................................................................................................... 7 Vocabulary...........................................................................................................................................10 Videoconference Guidelines........................................................................................................11 Pre- and Post-Assessment ...........................................................................................................12 Post-Conference Activity...............................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Structures and Events – a Nordic Perspective
    107 by Henning Dypvik1, Jüri Plado2, Claus Heinberg3, Eckart Håkansson4, Lauri J. Pesonen5, Birger Schmitz6, and Selen Raiskila5 Impact structures and events – a Nordic perspective 1 Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, NO 0316 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. 3 Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, P.O. Box 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. 4 Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. 5 Division of Geophysics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland. 6 Department of Geology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden. Impact cratering is one of the fundamental processes in are the main reason that the Nordic countries are generally well- the formation of the Earth and our planetary system, as mapped. reflected, for example in the surfaces of Mars and the Impact craters came into the focus about 20 years ago and the interest among the Nordic communities has increased during recent Moon. The Earth has been covered by a comparable years. The small Kaalijärv structure of Estonia was the first impact number of impact scars, but due to active geological structure to be confirmed in northern Europe (Table 1; Figures 1 and processes, weathering, sea floor spreading etc, the num- 7). First described in 1794 (Rauch), the meteorite origin of the crater ber of preserved and recognized impact craters on the field (presently 9 craters) was proposed much later in 1919 (Kalju- Earth are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • New Clues from Earth's Most Elusive Impact Crater: Evidence of Reidite in Australasian Tektites from Thailand
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321956231 New clues from Earth's most elusive impact crater: Evidence of reidite in Australasian tektites from Thailand Article in Geology · December 2017 DOI: 10.1130/G39711.1 CITATIONS READS 0 64 4 authors, including: Aaron J. Cavosie Timmons Erickson Curtin University Curtin University 100 PUBLICATIONS 2,285 CITATIONS 27 PUBLICATIONS 159 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Aaron J. Cavosie on 16 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. New clues from Earth’s most elusive impact crater: Evidence of reidite in Australasian tektites from Thailand Aaron J. Cavosie1, Nicholas E. Timms1, Timmons M. Erickson2, and Christian Koeberl3,4 1The Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR), Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia 2Lunar and Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas 77058, USA 3Natural History Museum, 1010 Vienna, Austria 4Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT in Australasian tektites from Thailand supports a Australasian tektites are enigmatic drops of siliceous impact melt found in an ~8000 × location for the source crater in Southeast Asia. ~13,000 km strewn field over Southeast Asia and Australia, including sites in both the Indian and Pacific oceans. These tektites formed only 790,000 yr ago from an impact crater estimated MUONG NONG–TYPE TEKTITES to be 40–100 km in diameter; yet remarkably, the young and presumably large structure Muong Nong–type tektites (MN-type, or lay- remains undiscovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocene Impact Crater Discovered in Colombia: Geological Evidences from Tektites
    Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 2832.pdf PLIOCENE IMPACT CRATER DISCOVERED IN COLOMBIA: GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCES FROM TEKTITES. A. Ocampo1, J. Gómez2, J. A. García3, A. Lindh4, A. Scherstén4, A. Pitzsch5, L. Page4, A. Ishikawa6, 7 8 9 9 10 11 1 K. Suzuki , R. S. Hori , Margarita Buitrago and José Abel Flores , D. Barrero , V. Vajda ; NASA HQ, Science Mission Directorate, US ([email protected]), 2Colombian Geological Survey, Bogotá, Colombia; 3Universidad Libre, Sociedad astronomica ANTARES, Cali, Colombia; 4Department of Geology, Lund University, Sweden; 5MAX–lab, Lund University, Sweden/ Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Institute Methods and Instrumentation for Synchrotron Radia- tion Research, Berlin, Germany; 6Department of Earth Science & Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Japan; 7IFREE/SRRP, Japan Agency for Marine–Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Japan; 8Department of Earth Science, Ehime University, Japan; 9Department of Geology, University of Salamanca, Spain. 10Consultant geologist, Bogotá, Colombia; 11Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden Introduction: The geological and paleontologi- The impact crater and the local geology: The cal record have revealed that impacts of large extra- Cali Crater is located in the Cauca Sub-Basin between terrestrial bodies may cause ecosystem devastation at a the Western and Central Colombian Cordillera, SE of global scale [1], whereas smaller impacts have more Cali, in a geologically complex and tectonically modify regional consequences depending on their size, impact area Fig 2 [5]. Using seismic data we determine the angle and composition of the target rocks [2]. Approx- outer ring of the buried Cali impact crater has major imately 200 impact structures are currently confirmed axis of 36 km and a minor axis of 26 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicxulub and the Exploration of Large Peak- Ring Impact Craters Through Scientific Drilling
    Chicxulub and the Exploration of Large Peak- Ring Impact Craters through Scientific Drilling David A. Kring, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas 77058, USA; Philippe Claeys, Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium; Sean P.S. Gulick, Institute for Geophysics and Dept. of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758, USA; Joanna V. Morgan and Gareth S. Collins, Dept. of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UK; and the IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Science Party. ABSTRACT proving the structure had an impact origin. to assess the depth of origin of the peak- The Chicxulub crater is the only well- The buried structure was confirmed by ring rock types and determine how they preserved peak-ring crater on Earth and seismic surveys conducted in 1996 and were deformed during the crater-forming linked, famously, to the K-T or K-Pg mass 2005 to be a large ~180–200-km–diameter event. That information is needed to effec- impact crater with an intact peak ring tively test how peak-ring craters form on extinction event. For the first time, geolo- (Morgan et al., 1997; Gulick et al., 2008). planetary bodies. gists have drilled into the peak ring of that The discovery of the Chicxulub impact The expedition was also designed to crater in the International Ocean structure initially prompted two scientific measure any hydrothermal alteration in Discovery Program and International drilling campaigns. In the mid-1990s, a the peak ring and physical properties of the Continental Scientific Drilling Program series of shallow onshore wells up to 700 m rocks, such as porosity and permeability, (IODP-ICDP) Expedition 364.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    educator’s guide Table of Contents INTRODUCTION . 3 ACTIVITY FOR GRADES 3-5 Introduction for Educator . 4 Asteroids in Orbit Student Activity . 5 ACTIVITIES FOR GRADES 6-8 Introduction for Educator . 7 What Are Asteroids? Instructions for Educator . 7 Making a Splash Instructions for Educator . 7 Working Together Instructions for Educator . 8 What Are Asteroids? Student Activity . 9 Making a Splash Student Activity . 11 Working Together Student Activity . 13 ACTIVITIES FOR GRADES 9-12 Introduction for Educator . 15 Tracing the Past Instructions for Educator . 15 Defending the Future Instructions for Educator . 16 Tracing the Past Student Activity . 17 Defending the Future Student Activity . 18 EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS ALIGNMENT . 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 20 2 Introduction AN EXTRAORDINARY FIELD TRIP AND LEARNING EXPERIENCE! Dear Educator, Planetary defense is a relatively new science . Only a few decades ago did we become certain Earth’s history of asteroid impacts was sure to repeat itself . Could we save our world today from a cosmic threat? You bet we can . But to tend to this problem, we must first understand it . That’s where Asteroid Hunters comes in . Asteroid Hunters will take your students on an exciting field trip across the Solar System and to the dawn of time . They’ll watch how gravity spun gas and dust into our Solar System, how rocky debris gathered into worlds, and how the planet-building leftovers became asteroids . They’ll learn that these natural wonders of deep space brought water to planets, and the building blocks of life itself . They will also see how we possess the technological know-how to keep an asteroid from hitting our planet– unlike the doomed dinosaurs of 65 million years ago .
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Methods in Impact Crater Hunting – Case Summanen
    Geophysical methods in impact crater hunting – Case Summanen L.J. Pesonen1, S. Hietala2*, J. Plado3, T. Kreitsmann3, J. Lerssi2, and J. Nenonen2 1 Solid Earth Geophysics Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Geological Survey of Finland, Kuopio, Finland 3 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Estonia, *correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Impact cratering is a ubiquitous process in our solar system affecting all planetary surfaces throughout geologic time. On Earth, there are currently 190 confirmed impact structures, which are distributed unevenly. The Fennoscandian Shield houses 17 % of them. The large amount of impact structures makes Fennoscandia one of the most densely cratered terrains on Earth. A dozen (12) impact structures have been discovered in Finland. The latest discovery, Lake Summanen is located in Central Finland, about 9 km southeast of city Saarijärvi. An impact generated structure was first hinted by airborne geophysical mapping by the Geological Survey of Finland in the early 2000`s (Lerssi et al., 2007) that revealed a circular ~2.6 km wide striking aeroelectromagnetic resistivity anomaly. Recent studies in 2017-2018 confirmed its impact origin based on the findings of shatter cone-bearing rocks and the identification of planar deformation features in quartz. 1. INTRODUCTION Summanen impact crater (62°39’00’’N, 25°22’30’’E) is located within the Paleoproterozoic Central Finland Granite Belt and is covered with the Lake Summanen. The lake is somewhat elliptical (8 km x 9 km x 4 km) in shape, whereby the longest axis extends in NW–SE direction due to the erosional influence of the latest (Weichselian) glaciation.
    [Show full text]
  • (S)TEM Analysis of Quartz-Coesite Relations in Impact Ejecta from the Australasian Tektite Strewn Field
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 12, EPSC2018-316-2, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2018 (S)TEM analysis of quartz-coesite relations in impact ejecta from the Australasian tektite strewn field Fabrizio Campanale (1) ([email protected]), Enrico Mugnaioli (2), Mauro Gemmi (2), Martin R. Lee (3), Billy P. Glass (4) and Luigi Folco (1) (1) Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Italy (2) Center for Nanotechnology Innovation@NEST, Pisa, Italy (3) Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK (4) Department of Geosciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Abstract - the largest (~15% of Earth's surface) and the youngest one (~0.8 Myr old) on Earth. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy observations on shocked silica mineral grains from the Australasian tektite/microtektite strewn field suggest that coesite crystals form directly in contact with quartz grains through a subsolidus reconstructive transformation. This finding is in contrast with the current mainstream view, which considers coesite as the product of a rapid crystallization from a dense silica melt or glass during shock unloading. 1. Introduction Quartz is one of the most common mineral in Earth's continental crust. The study of shock metamorphic features in quartz and its shock induced silica polymorphs, i.e., coesite and stishovite, is thus relevant for defining the physical conditions attained during the majority of hypervelocity impacts of cometary or asteroidal bodies on Earth. In endogenic geological processes, which typically involve equilibrium reactions and time-frames from years to thousands of years, coesite forms from quartz Figure 1: Microscopic shocked ejecta composed by at pressures between ~3 and ~10 GPa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dakhleh Glass: Product of an Impact Airburst Or Cratering Event in the Western Desert of Egypt?
    The Dakhleh Glass: Product of an impact airburst or cratering event in the Western Desert of Egypt? Item Type Article; text Authors Osinski, G. R.; Kieniewicz, J.; Smith, J. R.; Boslough, M. B. E.; Eccleston, M.; Schwarcz, H. P.; Kleindienst, M. R.; Haldemann, A. F. C.; Churcher, C. S. Citation Osinski, G. R., Kieniewicz, J., Smith, J. R., Boslough, M. B. E., Eccleston, M., Schwarcz, H. P., ... & Churcher, C. S. (2008). The Dakhleh Glass: Product of an impact airburst or cratering event in the Western Desert of Egypt?. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 43(12), 2089-2107. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00663.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 07/10/2021 14:51:55 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656510 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, Nr 12, 2089–2107 (2008) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org The Dakhleh Glass: Product of an impact airburst or cratering event in the Western Desert of Egypt? Gordon R. OSINSKI1*, Johanna KIENIEWICZ2, Jennifer R. SMITH3, Mark B. E. BOSLOUGH4, Mark ECCLESTON5, Henry P. SCHWARCZ6, Maxine R. KLEINDIENST7, Albert F. C. HALDEMANN8, and Charles S. CHURCHER9 1Departments of Earth Sciences/Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada 2Department of Geosciences, Denison University, Granville, Ohio 43023, USA 3Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University, Campus Box 1169, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA 4Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA 5Archaeology Program, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Australia 6School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada 7Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada 8European Space Agency, ESTEC HME-ME, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Subsolidus Quartz-Coesite Transformation in Impact Ejecta from the Australasian Tektite Strewn field
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 264 (2019) 105–117 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Evidence for subsolidus quartz-coesite transformation in impact ejecta from the Australasian tektite strewn field Fabrizio Campanale a,b,⇑, Enrico Mugnaioli b, Luigi Folco a, Mauro Gemmi b Martin R. Lee c, Luke Daly c,e,f, Billy P. Glass d a Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita` di Pisa, V. S. Maria 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy b Center for Nanotechnology Innovation@NEST, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy c Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK d Department of Geosciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA e Australian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, NSW, Australia f Space Science and Technology Centre, School of Earth and Planetary Science, Curtin University, Bentley, 6102 WA, Australia Received 1 April 2019; accepted in revised form 11 August 2019; Available online 21 August 2019 Abstract Coesite, a high-pressure silica polymorph, is a diagnostic indicator of impact cratering in quartz-bearing target rocks. The formation mechanism of coesite during hypervelocity impacts has been debated since its discovery in impact rocks in the 1960s. Electron diffraction analysis coupled with scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy of shocked silica grains from the Australasian tektite/microtektite strewn field reveals fine-grained intergrowths of coesite plus quartz bearing planar deformation features (PDFs).À Quartz and euhedral microcrystalline coesite are in direct contact, showing a recurrent pseudo iso-orientation, with the ½111* vector of quartz near parallel to the [0 1 0]* vector of coesite.
    [Show full text]