DOCSLIB.ORG

Moose-Gypsum Bridger-Teton National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moose-Gypsum Bridger-Teton National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Moose-Gypsum Bridger-Teton National Forest Pinedale Ranger Distr ict Final Environmental Impact Statement May 2006 and Record of Decision United States Forest Bridger-Teton 340 N. Cache Department of Service National Forest PO Box 1888 Agriculture Jackson, WY 83001-1888 File Code: 1950 Date:May 2, 2006 Dear Planning Participant, Enclosed is the Moose-Gypsum Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record Of Decision (ROD). The Moose-Gypsum Project is located on the Pinedale Ranger District, Bridger-Teton National Forest. The FEIS identifies the Proposed Action with two additional alternatives, including the No-Action alternative. The selected alternative in the ROD is the FEIS Proposed Action as modified. Under the FEIS Proposed Action, management actions could impact approximately 34,219 acres (31 percent) of the 110,397 acres within the project area. Activities include vegetation and fuels management (including timber harvest), travel management, and recreation resource management. A modification to the Proposed Action was completed between Draft and FEIS removing a portion of the Dollar Lake and Little Sheep fuels reduction treatment units. This was done in order to better meet the criteria for the Canada Lynx Conservation Assessment and Strategy. The analysis for all resources has been modified in the FEIS. There was an additional 43 acre reduction in timber harvest acres between the FEIS Proposed Action and that described in the Record of Decision (ROD). This change was made to better meet visual quality standards. The change was minor and had no impact on the conclusions reached in the environmental effects section of Chapter 3 in the FEIS. Copies of the ROD and FEIS are being mailed to those who commented on the DEIS, and are available to those who request it. The FEIS and ROD may also be viewed on the Bridger-Teton National Forest website at: www.fs.fed.us/r4/btnf/projects, and at libraries close to the Forest. The administrative review and appeal procedures regarding decisions made by the deciding officer in the ROD are discussed in detail in the ROD. To request further information or if you have questions, please contact Craig Trulock, District Ranger at the Pinedale Ranger District, P.O. Box 220, Pinedale Wyoming 82941 or phone 307-367-4326. Sincerely, /s/ Kniffy Hamilton CAROLE ‘KNIFFY’ HAMILTON Forest Supervisor Moose-Gypsum Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by: Pinedale Ranger District Bridger-Teton National Forest Pinedale, WY With the assistance of: Bionomics Environmental, Inc. Boise, ID May 2006 Moose-Gypsum Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Sublette County, Wyoming Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Bridger-Teton National Forest Responsible Official: Forest Supervisor Carole ’Kniffy’ Hamilton Bridger Teton National Forest P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, WY 83001 For Information Contact: Craig Trulock Pinedale Ranger District 307-367-4326 Abstract: The Moose-Gypsum Project is located in the Pinedale Ranger District of the Bridger- Teton National Forest. The project is proposed to address the goals and objectives of the 1990 Bridger-Teton National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan and to help move the project area toward the desired conditions described in that plan and in the 1999 Upper Green Landscape Assessment. The project area includes one Management Area established in the Forest Plan and a portion of the Bridger Wilderness, and has eight Desired Future Conditions (DFCs) associated with them. Each DFC has its own unique management direction. The BTNF proposes a series of management actions that would impact approximately 34,219 acres (31 percent) of the 110,397 acres within the Moose-Gypsum project area. The project would be implemented over a 10-year period. Activities include vegetation and fuels management (including timber harvest), travel management, and recreation resource management including dispersed campsite closure and rehabilitation. The project is designed to be compatible with other resource values including recreation, wildlife, range, and wilderness objectives and is in compliance with the Forest Plan, Federal laws, policies, and regulations. This Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) discusses the purpose and need for the Proposed Action, alternatives to the Proposed Action, potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of implementing each alternative, mitigation measures, and a monitoring plan. Public review of the initial proposal during the scoping period in 2004 identified several key issues that led to the development of the Proposed Action as described in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and two alternatives. The DEIS Proposed Action was further modified, since it was released to the public, reducing the amount of fuels treatment acres in order to better meet the Lynx Conservation Assessment and Strategy (LCAS). The FEIS Proposed Action would impact approximately 34,219 acres vs. 34,862 acres in the DEIS Proposed Action. It includes 1,797 acres of timber harvest, 5,034 acres of fuels reduction, 6,168 acres of aspen management, 21,220 acres of sagebrush-grassland-aspen management, an addition of 22.5 miles of designated travel routes, 9.5 miles of road closure, and the closure and rehabilitation of 29 dispersed campsites. Alternative 1 (no action) would result in no active management. It serves as a comparison alternative for analyzing the effects of the Proposed Action and Alternative 2. Alternative 2 (modified action) would impact a total of approximately 28,755 acres. It would have less active vegetation management than under the Proposed Action. It includes 1,225 acres of timber harvest, 2,608 acres of fuels reduction, 6,168 acres of aspen management, 18,754 acres of sagebrush-grassland-aspen management, an addition of 16.75 miles of designated travel routes, 12.5 miles of road closure, and the closure and rehabilitation of 29 dispersed campsites. The alternative selected in the Record of Decision (ROD) is a slightly modified version of the identified in this FEIS. Public comments received during the review period of the DEIS were analyzed by the Forest Service and responded to in Appendix E of the FEIS and resulted in modifications to the FEIS where appropriate. Reviewers had an obligation to structure their participation in the National Environmental Policy Act process so that it is meaningful and alerts the agency to the reviewers’ position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 (1978). Environmental objections that could have been raised at the draft stage may be waived if raised after completion of the FEIS. City of Angoon v. Hodel (9th Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Comments on the DEIS should be specific and should address the adequacy of the statement and the merits of the alternatives discussed (40 CFR 1503.3) Moose-Gypsum Final Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________ Cover Sheet Dear Reader Letter Title Page Abstract TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................... i List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v List of Figures..................................................................................................................viii List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................x Record of Decision ......................................................................................................... R-1 Summary..........................................................................................................................S-1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................I-1 CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE AND NEED......................................................................1-1 1.1. PROJECT LOCATION ...................................................................................1-1 1.2. PURPOSE AND NEED...................................................................................1-1 1.3. PROPOSED ACTION...................................................................................1-10 1.4. DECISIONS TO BE MADE .........................................................................1-10 1.5. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...........................................................................1-11 1.6. ISSUES ..........................................................................................................1-11 1.6.1. Fire Management and Ecosystem Sustainability ...................................1-12 1.6.2. Vegetation Management ........................................................................1-12 1.6.3. Travel Plan and Access Management....................................................1-12 1.6.4. Watershed Health...................................................................................1-12 1.6.5. Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species and Wildlife Habitat...1-13 1.7. OTHER CONCERNS....................................................................................1-13 1.7.1. Visual Impacts .......................................................................................1-13 1.7.2. Prescribed Fire Risk...............................................................................1-13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bridger-Teton National Forest Evaluation of Areas with Wilderness Potential
    BTNF Evaluation of Areas with Wilderness Potential 2008 BRIDGER-TETON NATIONAL FOREST EVALUATION OF AREAS WITH WILDERNESS POTENTIAL Phillips Ridge Roadless Area 9/23/2009 1 CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2 The 2001 roadless rule, areas with wilderness potential, and process for integration .................2 Capability factors defined ............................................................................................................4 Availability defined .....................................................................................................................9 Need defined ................................................................................................................................9 BTNF areas with wilderness potential .........................................................................................11 Eligibility factors by area .............................................................................................................15 Summary of capability factors .....................................................................................................68 Areas with Wilderness potential and Forest Plan revision ..........................................................70 INTRODUCTION Roadless areas were identified during the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation II (RARE II) analysis conducted in 1978 and re-evaluated in 1983 to include all areas of at least
    [Show full text]
  • Data Set Listing (May 1997)
    USDA Forest Service Air Resource Monitoring System Existing Data Set Listing (May 1997) Air Resource Monitoring System (ARMS) Data Set Listing May 1997 Contact Steve Boutcher USDA Forest Service National Air Program Information Manager Portland, OR (503) 808-2960 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 DATA SET DESCRIPTIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 National & Multi-Regional Data Sets EPA’S EASTERN LAKES SURVEY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 EPA’S NATIONAL STREAM SURVEY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 EPA WESTERN LAKES SURVEY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) LICHEN MONITORING-------------------------------------------------14 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) OZONE BIOINDICATOR PLANTS ----------------------------------15 IMPROVE AEROSOL MONITORING--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 IMPROVE NEPHELOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 IMPROVE TRANSMISSOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION PROGRAM/ NATIONAL TRENDS NETWORK----------------19 NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan for the Shoshone National Forest
    Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan Shoshone National Forest Clocktower Creek and Wapiti Ridge, Washakie Wilderness Prepared by: /s/ Greg Bevenger __________________________________ Greg Bevenger, Air Program Manager Recommended by: /s/ Bryan Armel ______________________________________________ Bryan Armel, Resources Staff Officer Recommended by: /s/ Loren Poppert ______________________________________________ Loren Poppert, Recreation Staff Officer Approved by: /s/ Rebecca Aus ______________________________________________ Rebecca Aus, Forest Supervisor May 2010 Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan Introduction Background As part of the USDA Forest Service effort to better understand and monitor wilderness areas, the agency has adopted the 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge (Forest Service 2005). The 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge was developed by the Chief’s Wilderness Advisory Group (WAG) as a quantifiable measurement of the Forest Service’s success in wilderness stewardship. The goal identified by the Wilderness Advisory Group, and endorsed by the Chief, is to bring each wilderness under Forest Service management to a minimum stewardship level by the year 2014, the fiftieth anniversary of the Wilderness Act. The Challenge was initiated in fiscal year 2005. The Challenge contains ten items that highlight elements of wilderness stewardship. These elements are 1) the natural role of fire, 2) invasive plants, 3) air quality, 4) education, 5) protection of recreational opportunities, 6) recreational site inventory, 7) outfitters
    [Show full text]
  • Lakeside Lodge Opportunity Cabins | Restaurant | Bar | Marina PINEDALE, WY
    Offering Memorandum For Sale | Investment Lakeside Lodge Opportunity Cabins | Restaurant | Bar | Marina PINEDALE, WY Offered by: John Bushnell 801.947.8300 Colliers International 6550 S Millrock Dr | Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84121 P: +1 801 947 8300 Table of Contents 1. LAKESIDE LODGE RESORT AND MARINA 2. FREMONT LAKE 3. PINEDALE AND SURROUNDING AREA 4. ANNUAL SAILBOAT REGATTA AND FISHING DERBIES 5. ANNUAL MOUNTAIN MAN RENDEZVOUS 6. WIND RIVER AND BRIDGER TETON NATURAL FOREST 7. REGIONAL INFORMATION 8. WEDDINGS AT LAKESIDE 9. INCOME AND PERFORMANCE This document has been prepared by Colliers International for advertising and general information only. Colliers International makes no guarantees, representations or warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, regarding the information including, but not limited to, warranties of content, accuracy and reliability. Any interested party should undertake their own inquiries as to the accuracy of the information. Colliers International excludes unequivocally all inferred or implied terms, conditions and warranties arising out of this document and excludes all liability for loss and damages arising there from. This publication is the copyrighted property of Colliers International and/or its licensor(s). ©2018. All rights reserved. LAKESIDE LODGE | SALE OFFERING COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL P. 3 LAKESIDE LODGE - PINEDALE, WY Lakeside Lodge Resort and Marina ADDRESS: Lakeside Lodge Resort and Marina 99 FS RD 111 Fremont Lake Rd POB 1819 Pinedale, WY 82941 Web Site: www.lakesidelodge.com PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Lakeside Lodge is a full service resort located 4 miles north of Pinedale, Wyoming and 75 miles south of Jackson Hole and Teton National Park, Wyoming and 110 miles south of Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Final Report
    2021 Final Report Table of Contents Agency Oversight………… ………………. ……………..………3 Advocacy and Education…. ………………. ………………..……16 ATV/OHV/Mountain Bikes. ………………. ………………..……19 Fisheries…………………... ………………. ……………..………21 Livestock Grazing………… ………………. ……………..………25 Mining……………………. ………………. ……………..………31 Oil and Gas………………... ………………. ……………..………37 Timber……………………. ………………. ……………..………39 Watersheds………………... ………………. ……………..………49 Wildlife…………………… ………………. ……………..………52 Other……………………… ………………. ……………..………57 2 AGENCY OVERSIGHT Status Yellowstone to Uintas Connection (Y2U) continues to participate in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by submitting science-based comments on many Forest Service (FS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) decisions. Y2U also provides feedback on agency monitoring protocol and works towards creative solutions to help these underfunded agencies accomplish their stated conservation and restoration goals. During 2020, Y2U submitted comments on fourteen (14) Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments and Categorical Exclusions for proposed projects occurring in the Ashley, Bridger-Teton, Caribou-Targhee, Flathead, Manti-La Sal and Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forests. The proposed projects included ATV/OHV trails, logging, mountain bike trails, mining, stream rehabilitation and vegetation treatments. During FY2020 we submitted comments on a Forest Plan Revision for the Ashley National Forest. We also submitted comments on twenty (20) proposed federal policy and rule changes and four (4) sets of comments on proposed wildlife
    [Show full text]
  • Zone Fuels Management Specialist GS – 0401 09/11 Permanent Appointment Bridger-Teton NF North, West and East Zones
    Zone Fuels Management Specialist GS – 0401 09/11 Permanent Appointment Bridger-Teton NF North, West and East Zones 3 Positions to be filled on the Forest Positions: The Bridger-Teton National Forest is taking applications for 3 Permanent, Full-Time GS-0401 09/11, Zone Fuels Management Specialists for the North (Jackson and Blackrock RD’s), West (Kemmerer and Grey’s River RD’s) and East (Pinedale and Big Piney RD’s) Fire management zones. Applications are due into USA jobs no later the 11:59 on Oct. 29th, 2020. Referral lists will be requested on Oct. 30th, 2020. Final determination of duty station will be made at the time of selection to the following duty locations: • 1 position on the North Zone, Jackson and Moran, Wyoming duty locations • 1 position on the East Zone, Big Piney and Pinedale, Wyoming duty locations • 1 position on the West Zone, Afton and Kemmerer, Wyoming duty locations Applicants should apply individually to all duty locations they would like to be considered for. These positions are advertised on USAJOBS at the following link https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/579245900 Bridger-Teton National Forest fire management is a fully integrated program with wildland fire operations/management, fuels management and preventions. The zone fuels management specialist will be expected to be an active participant in all areas of the BTNF fire program. This position provides oversight for and planning and implementation of the zone fuels program. The incumbent is responsible for fuels planning and implementation including prescribed burning, mechanical vegetation treatments, effects monitoring of hazardous fuel reduction projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridger Wilderness Fishing Guide
    The Bridger Wilderness The Bridger Wilderness, within the Wind River Mountain Range, was designated as one of the first Primitive areas in the country in 1931. The pristine condition of the land was secured under the Wilderness Act of 1964, with 392,169 acres designated as wilderness. In 1984, the Bridger Wilderness was expanded to its current size of 428,169 acres. The area lies on the west side of the Wind River Mountain Range and includes over 2,000 glacial carved lakes, ponds, and potholes. Over 500 of the lakes in the range are known to support fish and about 240 have been identified in this brochure. These lakes range in size from well over 400 acres to tiny tarns. Lakes are connected with over 550 miles of streams that meander through meadows and plummet through canyons and tallus slopes, before exiting the wilderness boundary. With over 600 miles of trails connecting the northern and southern ends of this wilderness, the area offers a diverse trout fishery, with the opportunity to catch cutthroat, rainbow, brook, brown, golden and lake trout. This wilderness is administered by the Pinedale Ranger District on the Bridger-Teton National Forest within Sublette County and a small portion of the Southern Winds lies in Fremont County. Regulations in the Bridger Wilderness include the following: 1. Individual groups are limited to 15 people. 2. Pack and saddle stock permitted in each group is limited to 25 animals. 3. The maximum length of stay by any individual or group is 16 days at one site. After 16 days the visitor must move a radius of 5 miles and may not return to the same site for 7 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material Not for Distribution
    Contents List of Maps ix List of Trail Profiles xi Acknowledgments xiii MATERIAL Introduction 3 PART 1. MONTANA Glacier National Park Trip 1. Ptarmigan– Glenns Lake–DISTRIBUTION Highline Loop 17 Trip 2. Gunsight Pass Traverse 45 Crazy Mountains– Custer FORGallatin National Forest Trip 3.COPYRIGHTED Crazy Mountains Traverse 61 Madison Range–NOT Lee Metcalf Wilderness (Spanish Peaks Unit), Custer Gallatin National Forest Trip 4. Spanish Peaks Loop 77 Beartooth Mountains– Absaroka- Beartooth Wilderness, Custer Gallatin National Forest Trip 5. The Beaten Path 95 n vii viii n CONTENTS PART 2. WYOMING Yellowstone National Park Trip 6. Bechler River Trail 119 Grand Teton National Park Trip 7. Teton Crest Trail 139 Cloud Peak Wilderness, Bighorn National Forest Trip 8. Solitude Trail Loop 165 Bridger Wilderness, Bridger- Teton National Forest Trip 9. Wind River Highline Traverse 187 Bridger and Popo Agie Wildernesses, Bridger- Teton and Shoshone National Forests MATERIAL Trip 10. Cirque of the Towers Loop 219 Fitzpatrick Wilderness, Shoshone National Forest Trip 11. Glacier Trail to Gannett Peak 241 DISTRIBUTION PART 3. COLORADO Flat Tops Wilderness, White River and Medicine Bow– Routt National ForestsFOR TripCOPYRIGHTED 12. Trappers Lake– Devils Causeway Loop 257 Maroon Bells–NOT Snowmass Wilderness, White River National Forest Trip 13. Maroon Bells: Four Pass Loop 275 Weminuche Wilderness, Rio Grande and San Juan National Forests Trip 14. Weminuche Wilderness Traverse 289 Appendix: Best Times by Season 321 About the Authors 323 Index 327 Introduction Best Backpacking Trips in Montana, Wyoming and Colorado is our third book in this series following guides to similar excursions in California and Nevada; and Utah, Arizona, and NewMATERIAL Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Statewide Wilderness Study Report Wilderness Study Area Specific Recommendations United States Bureau of Land Management
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 1-1-1991 Wyoming Statewide Wilderness Study Report Wilderness Study Area Specific Recommendations United States Bureau of Land Management Recommended Citation United States Bureau of Land Management, "Wyoming Statewide Wilderness Study Report Wilderness Study Area Specific Recommendations" (1991). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 251. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/251 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office September 1991 Wyoming Statewide Wilderness Study Report WILDERNESS STUDY REPORT Wilderness Study Area Specific Recommendations Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming September 1991 Volume II -/ if COMPLETED Wilderness Study Areas in Wyoming TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Analysis of WSA Recommendations Or... Creek/COdy studJ Owl Creek Study Area ••• • • •••••• •••••••••••• • ••••..•.. • ••• •• 3 Bobcat Draw Badlands Study Area •••••••••••• •• •• •• •••• • •• •• 12 Sheep Mountain Study Area • •• • •• ••..•
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Non-Suppression Management Strategies of Unplanned Wildland Fire in the Palisades Wilderness Study Area
    An Analysis of Non-Suppression Management Strategies of Unplanned Wildland Fire in the Palisades Wilderness Study Area Anthony Rojo Assistant Engine Captain Jackson Ranger District Bridger-Teton National Forest April 18, 2012 (rev. April 25, 2012) Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for TFM 26 Contents Figures & Tables ....................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ..................................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Significance ................................................................................................................... 3 Scope & Limitations ............................................................................................................................... 12 Decision Makers Problem Statement .................................................................................................... 13 Management Goal ................................................................................................................................... 13 Project Objective ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fltfa Project Examples
    FLTFA PROJECT EXAMPLES Hells Canyon Wilderness, AZ City of Rocks National Reserve, ID Grand Teton National Park, WY Arizona, Hells Canyon Wilderness, 640 acres, 2009. Through FLTFA, BLM used revenue from the sales of land in Phoenix to purchase a critical 640 acre inholding within the heart of Hells Canyon Wilderness, a popular hiking spot north of Phoenix near Lake Pleasant. After the FLTFA purchase, community reinvestment act money helped build a trail where hiking access had been an issue when the property was in private hands. Now hikers can enjoy more trail access to the canyon and views of rugged mountains, desert springs and other features of the beautiful Sonoran desert. Arizona, Coconino National Forest, 45 acres, 2008 Adjacent to the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness, Packard Ranch contains portions of the area’s desert riparian ecosystem and scenic red rock vistas. The Verde River and Sycamore Creek, perennial streams that provide habitat for several endangered and threatened fish species, both flow through the parcel. The area in which this property is located also has archeological resources of national and international importance. Packard Ranch includes an important trailhead providing access to two trails into the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness. Arizona, Cartwright Ranch, Tonto National Forest, 28 acres, 2007. Located just 30 miles north of Phoenix, this 28-acre inholding within Tonto National Forest and the Seven Springs Recreation Area connects access to the Cave Creek trail network featuring over 35 miles of trails for hiking, mountain biking, horseback riding and hunting. Using FLTFA and LWCF funds, the U.S. Forest Service acquired the tract, ensuring continued public access to the trail network at Cave Creek, Seven Springs and Bronco Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Lookouts, Latrines, and Lodgepole Cabins
    United States Lookouts, Latrines, and Department of Agriculture Lodgepole Cabins Forest Service Intermountain Region Administrative Facilities of Wyoming’s Bridger-Teton Bridger-Teton National Forest, 1904-1955 National Forest March 2003 Volume One: Historic Context Statement Forest Service Report No. BT-02-637 Cover: Virtually unchanged since it was built by Civilian Conservation Corps workers in the mid-1930s, the latrine at Willow Creek Guard Station on the Pinedale Ranger District epitomizes the Forest Service’s quest for architectural standardization in its administrative facilities. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Lookouts, Latrines, and Lodgepole Cabins Administrative Facilities of Wyoming’s Bridger-Teton National Forest, 1904-1955 Volume I: Historic Context Statement Forest Service Report No. BT-02-637 By Jim Bailey, Ph.D. Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service Intermountain Region Facilities Group 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 801-625-5704 (Contact: Richa Wilson, Regional Architectural Historian, at above address and phone) PREFACE The Bridger-Teton National Forest is developing a historic facilities management plan in compliance with Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
    [Show full text]