DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Roswell Sidewalk Gap Prioritization Program: July 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Roswell Sidewalk Gap Prioritization Program: July 2021 Sidewalk Gap Prioritization Program: July 2021 Arterial and Collector Roads Only Linear Side of TOTAL Rank Project Name From/At (south/west) To (north/east) Staff Comment Feet Road SCORE 1 Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) Martin's Landing Dr Eves Road 4625 South 60 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 2 Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) Powder Ridge West of Champions Green Drive 1360 North 58 Location is Candidate for future Developer build 3 Hardscrabble Road Existing Sidewalk near Target and RRFB X'ing Brooksglen Drive 2300 North 55 Project being Designed now by RDOT 4 Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) Existing Sidewalk S of Ellard Drive Existing Sidewalk N of Garrard Landing 1540 South 55 5 Woodstock Road Exisiting Sidewalk near Young Life Academy Exisiting Sidewalk west of Coleman St 250 South 53 ROW acquisition Summer 2021, Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 6 Old Roswell Road Existing Sidewalk near Northfield Place Lakewood Parkway 1180 East 53 Part of Project within City of Alpharetta 7 Atlanta St (SR 9) Sandy Springs 530' S of Chattahochcee Cir 1325 East 53 GDOT has Future Road Project planned 8 Atlanta St (SR 9) Sandy Springs Warm Spings Cir 3185 West 51 GDOT has Future Road Project planned 9 Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) Existing Sidewalk SE of Cartique Carwash Existing Sidewalk N of Martin's Landing Dr 2490 South 50 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 10 Old Alabama Road Big Creek Park Rouse Ln 1140 North 48 Project being Designed now by RDOT 11 Old Alabama Road 200' W of Crabtree Dr Tyson Cir 1160 North 48 Project being Designed now by RDOT 12 Old Alabama Road Roxburgh Drive Existing Sidewalk 580' W of Long Pointe 760 North 48 Utility challeges exist. Johns Crk has future Road Project planned 13 Warsaw Road Singing Hills Drive Old Roswell Road 1200 East 48 Part of project on border with Alpharetta 14 Dogwood Road 800' N of Riverside Rd Pavillion Center 1445 East 48 Cordinating with GDOT on GA-400 project, Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 15 Magnolia Street Coleman Road 300' E of Coleman 300 North 48 Council voted not to pursue (Nov 2020), Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 16 Scott Road Old Scott Road Existing Sidewalk just E of Nesbit Entry 1770 South 48 RDOT added Crosswalk to connect to opposing sidewalk 17 Atlanta Street (SR 9/120) Existing Sidewalk S of Ramsey St Ramsey Street 230 West 46 Parking lot already provides walkable surface 18 Hardscrabble Road Northside Chapel Funeral Home Driveway CVS Driveway 240 South 45 19 Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) Existing Sidewalk 600' S of Nesbit Ferry Existing Sidewalk by Kroger entrance 370 North 45 Project in / on border with Johns Creek 20 Mountain Park Road 650' N of Target Shopping Center Mountain Park Elementary 2560 East 45 challenging terrain exist in one area 21 Dogwood Road Riverside Rd Grimes Bridge Rd 2700 West 45 Cordinating with GDOT on GA-400 project, Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 22 Mountain Park Road Woodstock Rd - SR 92 Wildwood Springs Rd 4655 West 45 challenging terrain exist in one area 23 Hardscrabble Road Exisiting Sidewalk 730' E of Crosscrabble Place Existing Sidewalk 270' W of King Road 1700 South 43 Scoping sidewalk across the street (#3 above) 24 Hembree Road Upper Hembree Road Existing Sidewalk near Tapestry Community Church 1100 North 43 25 Atlanta St (SR 9) 200' N of Warm Springs Church St 635 West 43 GDOT has Future Road Project planned 26 Norcross Street Existing Sidewalk 220' E of Myrtle Street Roundabout 3000 South 43 Bridge replacement needed over Hog Waller Crk 27 Nesbit Ferry Road Exisiting Sidewalk 150' S of Shurburne Drive Rivermont Parkway 1130 West 43 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 28 Nesbit Ferry Road Crème de la Crème entrance Existing Sidewalk near Veternary Office 390 West 43 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 29 Old Roswell Road Existing Sidewalk near Apartment Complex NEWarsaw of Comm Roaderce Parkway 1420 North 41 Part of Project within City of Alpharetta 30 Riverside Road Atlanta St City Building 560 South 40 GDOT has Future Road Project planned, Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 31 Nesbit Ferry Road Champions Green Existing Sidewalk N of Champions 635 West 40 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 32 Nesbit Ferry Road Arbor Woods Drive Arden Place 640 West 40 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 33 Nesbit Ferry Road Existing Sidewalk S of Abbottswell Drive 400' S of Scott Road 680 West 40 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 34 Riverside Road Shoot the Hooch Dogwood Rd 680 South 40 RDOT Riverside Road Project planned Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 35 Nesbit Ferry Road Brumbelow Road Existing Sidewalk at Nesbit Ferry Montessori School 730 West 40 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 36 Dogwood Road Doubletree Driveway (southern) Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) 860 West 40 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, challenging terrain 37 Crabapple Road Victoria Way SR 92 890 East 38 38 Hembree Road Hembree Park Entrance Existing Sidewalk W of Montessori School 690 North 38 39 Atlanta Street (SR 9/120) Park Square Oak Street 1570 West 38 challenging terrain infront of church 40 Riverside Road Exisiting Sidewalk S of Northcliff Trace Eves Road 3340 South 38 challenging terrain - one area on edge of river 41 Houze Road (SR 140) Bradford Drive Rucker Road 1200 West 36 Location is Candidate for future Developer build 42 Crabapple Road Existing sidewalk north of Church Existing sidewalk across from Chaffin Road 220 East 35 43 Crabapple Road Houze Way Existing Sidewalk near Hidden Pond Lane (entrance to380 Methodist EastChurch) 35 44 Old Alabama Road Existing Sidewalk @ Holcomb 400 Exisiting Sidewalk 200' S of Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 730140) East 35 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 45 Crabapple Road Existing Sidewalk N of Chaffin Rd Hembree Road 580 East 35 46 Marietta Hwy (SR 120) Existing Sidewalk E' of Lullwater Ct Existing Sidewalk W' of Westcroft Ln 680 North 35 47 Crabapple Road Existing Sidewalk N of Chaffin Rd Hembree Road 905 West 35 48 Atlanta St (SR 9) 100' N of Heritage Trail Exisitng Sidewalk at Roswell Flower Shop 295 West 34 GDOT has Future Road Project planned 49 Marietta Hwy (SR 120) City Limits Barrington Oaks Ridge 755 South 33 No sidewalk on Cobb County side 50 Warsaw Road Grimes Bridge Road Pattingham Drive 1620 South 33 51 Old Alabama Road Connector Old Alabama Road Alpharetta City Limits 3100 East 33 City installed sidewalk in 2019 on opposing side 52 Elkins Road Existing Sidewalk near Bombay Ln Existing Sidewalk S of Arbor Crk Dr 800 East 33 53 Steeplechase Drive Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) (west) Wayt Road 2900 South 33 54 Steeplechase Drive Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) (west) Wayt Road 2900 North 33 55 Marietta Hwy (SR 120) City Limits Coleman Rd 1280 North 33 56 Old Alabama Road 720' E of Pine Bloom Johns Creek City Limits 1610 South 33 57 Marietta Hwy (SR 120) Existing Sidewalk E' of Garrision Walk Exisiting Sidewalk W' of Barrington Dr 2065 South 33 58 Old Roswell Road Existing Sidewalk near Mobil 1 Lube Express Existing Sidewalk 175' SW of Commerce Pkwy 895 North 31 59 Holcomb Woods Parkway #100 Holcomb Woods Pkwy 140' W of Atlanta Academy 1040 East/North 31 RDOT has Project planned 60 Atlanta St (SR 9) Used Imports Auto King St 800 West 31 GDOT has Future Road Project planned 61 Pine Grove Road Existing Sidewalk E of Lake Charles Drive Existing Sidewalk W of Old Oak Trace 110 North 30 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 62 Pine Grove Road Existing Sidewalk 250' W of Old Oak Trce Old Oak Trce 250 North 30 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 63 Old Alabama Road 100 W' of Barrington Dr W Chruch in front of Lake Forest 645 North 30 64 Old Alabama Road 200 E' of Wooten Rd Epiphany Byzantine Church 690 North 30 65 Houze Rodd (SR 140) Roundabout Saddle Creek Dr 1760 East 30 Multi-Use trail project preparing for Construction later in 2021 66 Holcomb Bridge Road (SR 140) Existing Sidewalk near Fire Station Gwinnett County line 1380 North 30 67 Jones Road Lake Charles Road Existing Sidewalk W of Woodstock Road 1500 South 30 68 Marietta Hwy (SR 120) Existing Sidewalk E' of Renaissance Rd Existing Sidewalk W' Dowling Dr 3050 South 30 69 Riverside Road Atlanta St Dogwood Rd 7390 North 30 70 Holcomb Woods Parkway Planet Fitness Parking Lot Office Images Parking Lot 450 West 28 RDOT has Project planned 71 Pine Grove Road Existing Sidewalk 320' E of Pineridge Way Existing Sidewalk 180' W of Lynwood Drive 325 South 28 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 72 Willeo Road (west) Mosspointe Dr Willeo Baptist Church 760 South 28 73 Nesbit Ferry Road Scott Road Johns Creek City Limit 1300 West 28 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT, City of Johns Creek would lead planned 74 Coleman Road Marietta Highway (SR 120) Existing Sidewalk at Sub Division 1100 East 28 75 Coleman Road Existing Sidewalk 150' E of Wickerberry Lane Existing Sidewalk 125' W of Magnolia Walk 450 West 26 76 Upper Hembree Road Existing Sidewalk across from Foe Creek Drive Alpharetta City Limits 345 South 26 77 Elkins Road 440' N of Arbor Creek Dr Hembree Road 1060 East 26 78 Old Alabama Road Existing Sidewalk NE of Holcomb Bridge Road Existing Sidewalk at McCalla Raymer entrance 350 West 25 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 79 Hembree Road East of Wills Road Alpharetta City Limits at Cooperative Way 570 North 25 80 Pine Grove Road Synagouge Driveway 212' W of Tangletree 415 South 25 Potential TSPLOST 2 PROJECT 81 Eves Rd Riverside Rd Existing Sidewalk S of River Eves ES 510 West 25 82 Houze Road (SR 140) Pvt Dr N of Hollyberry Derby Forest Ct 535 West 25 83 Coleman Road Willeo E
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Module 6. Hov Treatments
    Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Module 6. TABLE OF CONTENTS MODULE 6. HOV TREATMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................ 6-5 TREATMENTS ..................................................... 6-6 MODULE OBJECTIVES ............................................. 6-6 MODULE SCOPE ................................................... 6-7 6.2 DESIGN PROCESS .......................................... 6-7 IDENTIFY PROBLEMS/NEEDS ....................................... 6-7 IDENTIFICATION OF PARTNERS .................................... 6-8 CONSENSUS BUILDING ........................................... 6-10 ESTABLISH GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................... 6-10 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE CRITERIA / MOES ....................... 6-10 DEFINE FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS ............................. 6-11 IDENTIFY AND SCREEN TECHNOLOGY ............................. 6-11 System Planning ................................................. 6-13 IMPLEMENTATION ............................................... 6-15 EVALUATION .................................................... 6-16 6.3 TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGIES .................. 6-18 HOV FACILITIES ................................................. 6-18 Operational Considerations ......................................... 6-18 HOV Roadway Operations ...................................... 6-20 Operating Efficiency .......................................... 6-20 Considerations for 2+ Versus 3+ Occupancy Requirement ............. 6-20 Hours of Operations ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • "2. Sidewalks". "Boston Complete Streets Design Guide."
    Sidewalk Zone Widths The width of the sidewalk contributes to the degree of When making decisions for how to allocate sidewalk space, comfort and enjoyment of walking along a street. Narrow the following principles should be used: sidewalks do not support lively pedestrian activity, and may create dangerous conditions where people walk in the Frontage Zone street. Typically, a five foot wide Pedestrian Zone supports > The Frontage Zone should be maximized to provide space two people walking side by side or two wheel chairs passing for cafés, plazas, and greenscape elements along build- each other. An eight foot wide Pedestrian Zone allows two ing facades wherever possible, but not at the expense of pairs of people to comfortably pass each other, and a ten reducing the Pedestrian Zone beyond the recommended foot or wider Pedestrian Zone can support high volumes of minimum widths. pedestrians. Pedestrian Zone Vibrant sidewalks bustling with pedestrian activity are not > The Pedestrian Zone should be clear of any obstructions only used for transportation, but for social walking, lingering, including utilities, traffic control devices, trees, and furniture. and people watching. Sidewalks, especially along Downtown When reconstructing sidewalks and relocating utilities, all Commercial, Downtown Mixed-Use, and Neighborhood Main utility access points and obstructions should be relocated Streets, should encourage social uses of the sidewalk realm outside of the Pedestrian Zone. by providing adequate widths. > While sidewalks do not need to be perfectly straight, the SIDEWALKS Pedestrian Zone should not weave back and forth in the When determining sidewalk zone widths, factors to consider right-of-way for no other reason than to introduce curves.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING and DESIGNING for PEDESTRIANS Table of Contents
    PLANNING AND DESIGNING FOR PEDESTRIANS Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................1 1.1 Scope of Guidelines.............................................................................. 2 1.2 How the Pedestrian-Oriented Design Guidelines Can be Used........ 5 1.3 How to Use the Chapters and Who Should Use Them ...................... 6 2. Pedestrian Primer ...................................................................9 2.1 What is Pedestrian-Oriented Design? ................................................. 9 2.2 Link Between Land Use and Transportation Decisions .................. 10 2.3 Elements of a Walkable Environment ............................................... 11 2.4 What Kind of Street Do You Have and What Kind Do You Want?... 12 2.4.1 "Linear" and "Nodal" Structures .......................................................................... 12 2.4.2 Interconnected or Isolated Streets ....................................................................... 14 2.4.3 Street Rhythm......................................................................................................... 15 2.4.4 "Seams" and "Dividers" ........................................................................................ 16 3. Community Structure and Transportation Planning.........17 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 17 3.2 Land Use Types and Organization..................................................... 18
    [Show full text]
  • Sidewalk Construction Standards
    OSHTEMO TOWNSHIP SIDEWALK/SHARED-USE PATH CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Approved August 28, 2018 CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION The construction of Sidewalks and Shared-Use Paths within Oshtemo is managed through the Township’s issuance of a Sidewalk/Non-Motorized Path Permit. The permitting process includes both a pre-pour inspection of the base and concrete forms, and a final project inspection for acceptance of the work. Concrete sidewalk shall conform to MDOT 2012 (or current edition) Standard Specifications for Construction Section 803, "Concrete Sidewalks, Sidewalk Ramps and Steps" and shall be a minimum of five (5) feet wide unless a different width is required by other Township ordinances or regulations. Driveway Sidewalk Crossings Where public sidewalks (AKA pedestrian route) cross residential driveways, the sidewalk shall be constructed of concrete through the driveway. Where a curb-line concrete gutter pan begins the driveway, the driveway apron between the curb and sidewalk shall also be constructed of concrete. Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) commercial driveways that lack a concrete roadway gutter, and which have greater than two lanes or heavy traffic may seek administrative approval to establish a pedestrian route over the driveway in lieu of placing a concrete walkway through the HMA material. When new sidewalks are extended through existing driveways, it shall be administratively determined by the Township to what extent the existing driveway pavements will need to be reconstructed in lieu of providing a pedestrian route over the pavement. Grade The sidewalk shall be constructed to match the existing grade, or as noted on the construction drawings. The sidewalk will have a transverse slope either toward or away from the road to maintain existing drainage patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Road Design Guidebook a Massachusetts Guide to Sustainable Design for Neighborhood Roads
    NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD DESIGN GUIDEBOOK A MASSACHUSETTS GUIDE TO SUSTAINABLE DESIGN FOR NEIGHBORHOOD ROADS A joint project of the Massachusetts Chapter of the American Planning Association Home Builders Association of Massachusetts Prepared for the Citizen Planner’s Training Collaborative March 14, 2012 Overview 2 1. Why a new Guidebook now? 2. Who will use this? 3. What is the general approach 4. Examples of recommended design standards 5. Cross Sections 6. Implementation Why Now? 3 1. Road design for whom? 2. Change in vehicle types 3. What is a win-win approach? 4. Length of time to change rules and regulations Why a new Guide now? 4 Massachusetts guide for Neighborhood Roads to create model guidelines and match local settings. This is called “context sensitive” design. Other road design manuals don’t get at local streets very well Who might use the Guidebook? 5 There are many “actors” in Transportation Design Engineers and designers (private and public sectors) Applicants who are building new infrastructure as part of their projects; Planning Directors/Planners; Planning Boards, Board of Selectmen, Fire and Emergency Service providers; Regional Planning Associations – link to state funding and state projects; Abutters; Land use and environmental advocates; and Finally –build roads that benefit the USERS What kind of Guidebook? 6 Project Goals Reduce environmental impacts of roadway development, operation and maintenance; Encourage Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) in residential roadway design; Provide specific guidelines and references for municipal application; Promote innovative techniques for stormwater management; and Reduce maintenance costs of roadways and stormwater systems. What kind of Guidebook? 7 Project Goals (contin.) Encourage consistency in approach and rationale in residential roadway design across Massachusetts; Promote inter-connectivity of roads; Promote pedestrian and non- motorized access; Promote universal accessibility; and Provide guidance for the design of neighborhood scale residential roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Crosswalk™ Automatic Activation Bollards
    SPEC Sheet #3000 Features/Benefits: Aesthetically pleasing Optional audible sounds Smart Crosswalk™ Automatic Activation Easily installed on sidewalk Simple control panel installations Bollards 12 VDC operation (down to 9 VDC) Automatic Activation Series — Bollards Internally illuminated courtesy light LightGuard Systems Part Number: LGS-T3A Directional detecting infrared sensors Description: Automatic Pedestrian Detection Bollards Application Notes: Infrared sensors are housed inside the Bollards and are typically preset by our factory. However, adjustments to the alignment of the sensor modules may be changed in the field. The infrared light beams are projected to the respective receiver module. The Bollard system is directionally sensitive and is activated only when a pedestrian enters into the crosswalk zone not when exiting. A pair of Bollards are placed at each end of the crosswalk, usually four bollards per crosswalk. When pedestrians enter into a crosswalk zone they pass between the Bollards and the Smart Crosswalk™ system is automatically activated. Each Bollard has a 24/7 LED courtesy light making the Bollard visible at night or during inclement weather. In order to capture the most pedestrians crossing the street, it is recommended that the bollards be placed a few feet wider than the crosswalk. General Performance Specifications Parameter Value Maximum separation 60 Feet Power consumption 2.5 Watts Operating temperature -20° to 80°C Operating voltage 9 VDC to 15 VDC Color White (custom colors available) Courtesy light color Amber Size 42” Tall, 8” Diameter © 2016 LightGuard Systems®, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2292 Airport Blvd., Santa Rosa, CA 95403 | Phone (707) 542-4547 | Fax (707) 525-6333 SPEC Sheet #3000 Bollard Installation Guidelines INSTALLATION STEPS Step 1 Prior to installing Bollards, the proposed site should be inspected several times to observe the everyday habits of local citizens who utilize the crosswalk.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance No. 2629: Chapter 99
    ORDINANCE NO. 2629 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 99, ARTICLES I, III AND VI, §§99-5, 99-18 AND 99-31, OF THE CODE OF SUSSEX COUNTY REGARDING STREETS, STREET DESIGN STANDARDS AND INSPECTIONS AND CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES WHEREAS, Chapter 99 of the Code of Sussex County contains certain technical requirements for the design, submission and subsequent approval of Final Site Plans for subdivisions, including the provision for the approval of the Sussex Conservation District; and WHEREAS, at the direction of the Sussex County Engineering Department, the street design requirements contained in Chapter 99 of the Code of Sussex County were revised and improved through the adoption of Ordinance Number 2489; and WHEREAS, after implementation of Ordinance Number 2489 the Sussex County Engineering Department recognized that further, minor, modifications or corrections are necessary with regard to street design standards and inspection and closeout procedures; and WHEREAS, Sussex County Council has determined that the minor modifications and/or corrections set forth in this Ordinance are appropriate and necessary to carry out the original intent of Ordinance Number 2489; and WHEREAS, Sussex County Council has determined that the provisions of this Ordinance promote the health, safety and welfare of Sussex County and its residents, property owners and visitors. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The Code of Sussex County, Chapter 99, Article I, §99-5 “Definitions” is hereby amended by deleting the language in [brackets] in the definition of “STREET (GENERAL)” within the Section as follows: §99-5 Definitions. STREET (GENERAL) A public or private thoroughfare which affords the principal means of access to abutting properties, whether designated as a “freeway”, “expressway”, “highway”, “road”, “avenue”, “boulevard”, “lane”, “place”, “circle” or however otherwise designated.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7, Driveways
    Chapter 7 - Driveways Publication 13M (DM-2) CHAPTER 7 DRIVEWAYS 7.0 INTRODUCTION It is in the public interest to regulate the location, design, construction, maintenance and drainage of access driveways, local roads and other property within State highway right-of-way for the purpose of security, economy of maintenance, preservation of proper roadway drainage, and safe and reasonable access for both vehicles and pedestrians crossing driveways. Driveways allow vehicles to ingress and egress streets at approved locations. In many locations, driveways will be required to cross pedestrian sidewalks within the roadway right-of-way. Driveways serve the same basic purpose for vehicles as curb ramps serve for pedestrians. Driveway crossings must be designed so that both drivers and pedestrians are able to use them effectively. The requirements and regulations for driveways must meet the requirements of the latest edition of the Pennsylvania Code, Title 67 - Transportation, Chapter 441 entitled "Access to and Occupancy of Highways by Driveways and Local Roads" (67 PA Code § 441). No driveway must be constructed or altered within State highway right-of-way without first obtaining a highway occupancy permit from the Department. The provisions of 67 PA Code § 441 contain the general conditions that apply to highway occupancy permit application procedures, fees, and permit issuance, general driveway design requirements and the general rules for penalties or revocation of permits based on violations pursuant to 67 PA Code § 441. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 also requires that all pedestrians including persons with disabilities be able to safely use sidewalks that cross driveways.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Construction Standards Pavement Markings
    Design and Construction Standards Volume 8 Pavement Marking Posted to the City of Edmonton’s Website in April 2012 PAVEMENT MARKING Design and Construction Standards Index April 2012 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS VOLUME 8 PAVEMENT MARKING PAVEMENT MARKING GUIDELINES For a detailed list of contents refer to the front of the Guidelines SPECIFICATIONS Section Title Issued 02760 Plastic Pavement Markings April 2012 02761 Glass Beads April 2012 02762 Traffic Paint April 2012 02763 Water Borne Traffic Paint April 2012 02764 Crosswalk and Stopline Painting January 1996 02765 Lane Markings - Hot Applied Paint February 1997 02767 Prefabricated Roadmarking Material April 2012 02768 MMA Spray Plastic February 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 LONGITUDINAL MARKINGS 2 1.1 DIRECTIONAL DIVIDING LINES 2 1.2 LANE LINES 3 1.3 PAVEMENT EDGE LINES 4 1.4 RESERVED LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4 1.5 GUIDE LINES 5 1.6 REVERSIBLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS 6 1.7 TWO - WAY LEFT TURN LANES 6 FIGURE 1.1 LINE TYPES 7 FIGURE 1.2 LANE AND LEAD - IN LINES 8 FIGURE 1.3 PAVEMENT EDGE LINES AT YIELDS AND 9 MERGE ENTRANCES FIGURE 1.4 PAVEMENT EDGE LINES AT EXITS 10 FIGURE 1.5 PAVEMENT EDGE LINES AT ON - OFF 11 AUXILIARY LANES TABLE 1 RESERVED LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS 12 FIGURE 1.6.0 ROAD MARKINGS FOR FULL TIME WITH - FLOW 13 AND CONTRA - FLOW RESERVED LANES FIGURE 1.6.1 ROAD MARKINGS FOR FULL TIME WITH - FLOW 14 RESERVED LANE FIGURE 1.6.2 ROAD MARKINGS FOR FULL TIME CONTRA-FLOW 15 RESERVED LANE FIGURE 1.6.3 ROAD MARKINGS FOR PART TIME WITH - FLOW 16 RESERVED LANE FIGURE
    [Show full text]
  • 304 1 Public Sidewalk Curb Ramps Typical Placement Of
    GENERAL NOTES Public sidewalk curb ramps shall be constructed in the public right of way at locations that will provide 1. continuous unobstructed pedestrian circulation paths to pedestrian areas, elements and facilities in the public right of way and to accessible pedestrian routes on adjacent sites. Curbed facilities with sidewalks and those without sidewalks are to have curb ramps constructed at all street intersections and at turnouts that have curbed returns. Partial curb returns shall extend to the limit prescribed by Index No. 515 to accommodate curb ramps. Ramps constructed at locations without sidewalks shall have a landing constructed at the top of each ramp, see Sheet 5. Varies The location and orientation of curb ramps shall be as shown in the plans. 2. (5' Min.) Curb ramp running slopes at unrestrained sites shall not be steeper than 1:12 and cross slope shall be 3. 0.02 or flatter. Transition slopes shall not be steeper than 1:12. Drop When altering existing pedestrian facilities where existing site development precludes the accommodation ng k of a ramp slope of 1:12, a running slope between 1:12 and 1:10 is permitted for a rise of 6" maximum l i t a 1:12 s e w and a running slope of between 1:10 and 1:8 is permitted for a rise of 3" maximum. Where compliance i 02 x e . op 0 d E l with the requirements for cross slope cannot be fully met, the minimum feasible cross slope shall be i S S provided. p p Ramp running slope is not required to exceed 8' in length, except at sites where the plans specify a i Trans m r .
    [Show full text]
  • High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Evaluation Ii
    HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES EVALUATION II Traffic Impact, Safety Assessment, and Public Acceptance Dr. Peter T. Martin, Associate Professor University of Utah Dhruvajyoti Lahon, Aleksandar Stevanovic, Research Assistants University of Ut ah Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah Traffic Lab 122 South Central Campus Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 November 2004 Acknowledgements The authors thank the Utah Department of Transportation employees for the data they furnished and their assistance with this study. The authors particularly thank the Technical Advisory Committee members for their invaluable input throughout the study. The authors are also thankful to the respondents who took the time to participate in the public opinion survey. The valuable contribution of those who helped collect data and conduct public opinion surveys is greatly appreciated. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • FDM 11-20-1 Modernization Dimensions and Design Classes May 17, 2021
    Facilities Development Manual Wisconsin Department of Transportation Chapter 11 Design Section 20 Cross Section Elements for Modernization of Urban Highways FDM 11-20-1 Modernization Dimensions and Design Classes May 17, 2021 1.0 General Modernization design criteria for various urban highway systems are given in this procedure. Attachment 1.1 and Attachment 1.5 contain modernization design criteria for urban highways. New Construction projects cannot use the Safety Certification Process (SCP) because no existing cross sectional or geometric features or crash histories exist in which to analyze safety performance, however predictive safety benefit/cost analyses in conjunction with environmental process evaluations can be used to compare alternatives. New Construction projects will use the S-3 Application as described in FDM 11-15-1.3.2. See FDM 11-15-1, FDM 11-1-20, FDM 11-4-10.4 and FDM 11-38 for further information on the S-2/S-3 Applications, Design Study Report (DSR), Design Justifications (DJs), and the SCP for use on Modernization projects. DJ approvals in the DSR are also available to use when needed to justify the preservation of existing features or the application of new cross sectional or geometric feature values outside of FDM design criteria values which are not initially recommended by the Safety Certification Process Document (SCD) or other safety analyses. See FDM 11-1-20 and FDM 11-4- 10.4 for information and guidance on the use of DSR DJs. 1.1 Cross Slopes The pavements of urban roadways typically have crowns in the middle and slope downward towards both edges.
    [Show full text]