DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Bearcats Baja Rear Suspension System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Bearcats Baja Rear Suspension System 2014 Bearcats Baja Rear Suspension System A Baccalaureate thesis submitted to the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science In Mechanical Engineering Technology By: Zack Freije April 2014 Thesis Advisor: Dean Allen Arthur 2014 Bearcats Baja – Rear Suspension System Zack Freije Rear Suspension Copyright © 2007 SAE International ABSTRACT Each vehicle is evaluated in terms of ergonomics, functionality, and producibility. To this end, design Baja SAE is an annual intercollegiate engineering design reports must demonstrate both sound engineering competition organized by the Society of Automotive principles as well as economic feasibility for Engineers, and serves as a capstone project for senior production. Mechanical Engineering Technology students at the University of Cincinnati. The 2014 Bearcats Baja team An off-road vehicle’s suspension system serves three vehicle is a complete new build from the ground up. This primary functions: to maintain tire contact with the design freedom allows for drastic improvements over the ground while the vehicle navigates rough terrain, to 2013 rear suspension system performance. Extensive reduce impact forces transferred to the driver, and to research was conducted to determine the key provide optimal vehicle handling dynamics. (1) performance metrics for the system. Several design options were considered and a final design was selected RESEARCH based on system integration, manufacturability, system weight, cost, and design specifications required to meet Full compliance with all relevant Baja SAE rules is the performance metrics. Failure modes were required. The applicable rules have been supplied in established based on 2013 in-use performance results. Appendix B. (2) FEA optimization was performed side by side with the 2013 system to establish a baseline for improved stress A list of reference material used for concept and handling while optimizing weight. The final design was application of design are given in Additional Sources. produced with a 22% cost savings, 7% weight reduction, and was verified to within 0.5° for toe/camber angle and Great attention was placed on the design and within 1/16” for all setting dimensions relative to performance of the 2013 rear suspension system during established design specifications. competition. In addition, a careful survey of design choices was conducted for all the top 10 teams during INTRODUCTION competition in 2013. Time was spent discussing the merits of these choices with the competing teams to gain Baja SAE is an annual intercollegiate engineering design a better understanding of the engineering justification. competition run by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Teams of students from Universities around the Five primary design choices were identified for further world design and build small off-road vehicles powered study: by engines with identical specifications. Single rear inboard brake – eliminates need for All teams must adhere to the rules and pass SAE’s heavy bearing carrier to support caliper, reduces technical and safety inspections. At each competition total vehicle weight. there are design evaluations and multiple dynamic events followed by a four-hour endurance race. Dynamic Trailing arm integrated bearing carrier – a simple events for 2014 include maneuverability, rock crawl, and and lightweight bearing carrier can be welding into suspension & tracking. The endurance race carries the the trailing arm to reduce weight, complexity and single largest point total. These events require a hardware. suspension that is agile as well as robust. Custom aluminum wheel hub – a simple and Furthermore, each team is competing to have its design lightweight hub can be manufactured for custom selected by a theoretical power sports manufacturing backspacing. Can eliminate rotor mounting bosses company with the stated intent of a 4,000 unit annual and hardware. production volume. Each team is responsible for all phases of the research and development process, from Narrow rear chassis/Longer control arms – fundraising to designing, manufacturing and testing. Reduce length of heavy frame tubes. Increase 2 length of lateral links to provide better control over camber change rate. Minimize size of heim joints/Mount in double shear – Heim joints can be reduced in size if proper calculations are made to determine the worst case forces. Mount them in double shear to reduce bending moment on the threads. Example pictures for these design cues are given in Appendix C. Figure 3 – Pitch Conditions The primary levers for improving rear suspension 20-30% antisquat is preferred. This increases the normal performance are: force at the tires and improves acceleration. Antisquat also increases suspension stiffness, producing jacking forces similar to an anti-roll bar without reducing body Toe Settings roll. Camber Settings Pitch Settings ROLL AXIS Roll Axis TOE SETTINGS Figure 4 – Roll Center Height Figure 1 – Toe Conditions Low roll center height is ideal as this leads to lateral acceleration weight transfer via body roll. Roll center Positive toe is preferred. For a rear wheel drive car, rear axis ideally slopes down towards the front of the vehicle toe-out leads to overseer which promotes a faster which allows for weight transfer to the front of the vehicle maneuverability response. Static toe or no change in toe during a turn. This allows more grip on the steering tires angle over the suspension travel is preferred. Dynamic and allows the rear end to break free and slide which or changing toe leads to bump steer. creates oversteer. CAMBER SETTINGS DESIGN SELECTION - Early design concepts that were rejected include: dual a-arm, torsion bar, inboard shock, single tube trailing arm, toe control link. It was observed at competition that failure of any part of a dual a-arm setup would result in disengagement of the drive axle, rendering the vehicle immobile and costing valuable time being towed into the pits. The 2013 Bearcats vehicle sustained complete failure to one of the lateral links during an endurance race, but was able to complete a lap and drive into the pits under its own power. It was determined that torsion bars add weight and complexity Figure 2 – Camber Conditions and attempt to correct for problems with the initial suspension design. Toe control links added weight and Negative camber is preferred. Negative camber leads to complexity, but were unnecessary because the straight line stability. Static camber or no change in suspension could be designed such that optimal toe was camber angle over the suspension travel is preferred. achieved without them. The single tube trailing arm was a lead option until it was determined that SAE chassis PITCH SETTINGS rules made the desired mounting location impossible. It was also considered that a single tube would have 3 greater potential to fail due to buckling after impacting DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS - The following constitutes a stationary objects on course. complete list of the selected design specifications to achieve with this rear suspension system design. The selected design incorporates a semi-trailing arm and a pair of lateral links. This is similar to the suspension Vertical Wheel Travel: 10.6” (269.2mm) used on an Integra Type R. This is the third year Recessional Wheel Travel: 0.5” (12.7mm) Bearcats Baja has used and improved this general Static Ground Clearance: 11” (279.4mm) design. Jounce Ground Clearance: 4” (101.6mm) Static Roll Center: 8” (203.2mm) Motion Ratio: 0.5 Sag: 33% of total travel Total Track Change: 4” (101.6mm) Track Change in Roll: 0” (0mm) Static Toe: 0 deg Toe Change Rate: 0.5 deg/in Static Camber: -0.5 deg Camber Change Rate: 0.25 deg/in Percent Anti Squat: 20%-30% System Weight: 50 lbs (22.7 kg) SYSTEM INTEGRATION – To accomplish the design specifications, both system integration and rules Figure 5 – Selected Design compliance were key factors. System integration required collaboration with braking, drivetrain, chassis, and front suspension systems. To reduce the weight for the rear suspension, the brakes were moved inboard, allowing for elimination of the purchased bearing carrier. A new custom bearing carrier was integrated into the trailing link. The Rear Roll Hoop was lengthened, lowering the drivetrain and vehicle CG, and optimizing the angle of the axles for increased power transfer and reduced plunge travel. In addition, the Rear Roll Hoop was made laterally narrow rearward of the gearbox to allow for longer trailing links which provide the desired camber change rate. Initial design concepts for trailing link geometry and mounting locations were rejected due to rules compliance for the Roll Hoop. Figure 6 – Axle Section View WEIGHT - The wheels and tires represent 61% of the DESIGN GOALS total system weight. However, weight was increased by 2% over last year for reliability. Previously, Douglas Blue PRIMARY OBJECTIVES Label (0.125” wall) were used, however all were bent during normal use. To improve this, ITP T9 Pro (0.190” Improve handling response* wall) were selected which are considerably stronger and Reduce Weight weigh 0.38 lbs more per corner. The same lightweight Reduce Cost 23x7-10 Carlisle 489 tires were selected due to their performance at competition. Selecting a stiffer wheel will *Handling Response - Dynamic handling is subjective, mitigate the negative impact of the 2-ply tire. and prior to testing, is largely theoretical with respect to design. Each driver will have a handling preference and A reduction of 4 lbs (7% of total system weight) was each overall vehicle will respond differently to the same achieved by replacing the Polaris Sportsman 300 design. Course design and conditions also play a factor. bearing carrier with a custom carrier that was integrated Holistic handling response takes into account the into the trailing link. The new bearing carrier was interaction between the front and rear suspension designed around a Honda TRX420 which allowed for designs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Variable Dynamic Testbed Vehicle Dynamics Analysis
    Variable Dynamic Testbed Vehicle Dynamics Analysis Allan Y. Lee Jet Propulsion Laboratory Nhan T. Le University of California, Los Angeles March 1996 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology JPL D-13461 Variable Dynamic Testbed Vehicle Dynamics Analysis Allan Y. Lee Jet Propulsion Laboratory Nhan T. Le University of California, Los Angeles March 1996 JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Table of Contents Page Table of Contents ............................................................ 2 Abstract .................................................................... 3 Introduction................................................................. 4 Scope and Approach.......................................................... 5 Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Program........................................... 6 Selected Production Vehicle Models............................................. 8 Steady-state and Transient Lateral Response Performance Metrics .................. 9 The Selected Baseline Variable Dynamic Vehicle ................................. 12 Sensitivity Analyses .......................................................... 13 Four Wheel Steering Control Algorithms........................................ 16 Results obtained from Consumer Union Obstacle Course .......................... 20 Concluding Remarks.......................................................... 21 References................................................................... 22 Acknowledgments ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suspension Geometry and Computation
    Suspension Geometry and Computation By the same author: The Shock Absorber Handbook, 2nd edn (Wiley, PEP, SAE) Tires, Suspension and Handling, 2nd edn (SAE, Arnold). The High-Performance Two-Stroke Engine (Haynes) Suspension Geometry and Computation John C. Dixon, PhD, F.I.Mech.E., F.R.Ae.S. Senior Lecturer in Engineering Mechanics The Open University, Great Britain. This edition first published 2009 Ó 2009 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • And Rear Driveline Package for Formula SAE
    Lightweight Torsen Style Limited Slip Differential and Rear Driveline Package for Formula SAE by Tony Scelfo SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2006 C2006 Tony Scelfo. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic MASSACHUt'i'Fl-. I I'ITUTE copies of this thesis document in whole or in part Or 'r.. v,, in any medium now known or hereafter created. AU 0 2 2006 /, // LIBRARIES Signature of Author 4::epx ep ,tof Mechanical Engineering May 12, 2006 Certified by I 1// ' ) J ?Daniel Frey Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by _ i__ _l.__ __ John H. Lienhard V KCj I . rossor of Mechanical Engineering Chairman, Undergraduate Thesis Committee ARCHIVES Table of Contents ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................... 7 I FSAE Competition ........................................................................................................... 9 2 Overall Design Philosophy........................................ 10 2.1 Functional Requirements....................................................................................... 10 2.2 Manufacturing Concerns ........................................ 11 2.3 Integration .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Bulletin TP-02173Revised1 Technical 11- Bulletin04
    TP-02173 Revised 11-04 DiscPlus™ DX195 and DX225 Air Disc Brakes Inspection, Installation and Diagnostics Technical Bulletin TP-02173Revised1 Technical 11- Bulletin04 Air Disc Brake Inspection Intervals and 3. Release the parking brake. Procedures 4. Measure the distance from the bottom of the air chamber to ASBESTOS AND NON-ASBESTOS the center of the clevis pin while the brakes are released. This FIBERS WARNING distance should be approximately 1.46-inches (37 mm). Some brake linings contain asbestos fibers, a cancer and lung Figure 1. disease hazard. Some brake linings contain non-asbestos ț If the distance is greater than 1.62-inches (41 mm): fibers, whose long-term effects to health are unknown. You Refer to the diagnostics table in this bulletin to determine must use caution when you handle both asbestos and the cause and correct the condition. non-asbestos materials. Figure 1 MEASURE ADJUSTED CHAMBER STROKE WARNING To prevent serious eye injury, always wear safe eye protection when you perform vehicle maintenance or service. Park the vehicle on a level surface. Block the wheels to prevent the vehicle from moving. Support the vehicle with safety stands. Do not work under a vehicle supported only by jacks. Jacks can slip and fall over. Serious personal injury and damage to components can result. Measure this Intervals distance. Periodically inspect the brakes. Check the stroke length and inspect the brake components for signs of wear and damage. 4004410a Use the schedule below that gives the most frequent inspections. Figure 1 ț Fleet chassis lubrication schedule 5. Have another person apply and hold the brakes one full ț Chassis manufacturer lubrication schedule application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butler Passport to Higher Performance Rel
    The Butler Passport to Higher Performance rel. Sept. 2003 2.0.0 RIM. 2.1.0 DEFINITION. The rim is the part of the wheel that has a suitable profi le and is of suitable dimensions to be a seat for the tyre. Passenger car rims are made up of three distinct areas, each of which performs a particular function: • a dropped central part, which is necessary for the operations of mounting and demounting the tyre; • two lateral fl anges, which bear the axial thrusts; • two conical seats, which serve as fastening seats for the tyre beads. The profi le can be symmetric as regards the central line. Usually, however, it is asymmetric in order to leave more room for the braking equipment. 2.1.1 RIM DESIGNATION. The dimensions of existing rim types are (further) expressed in F.E.: 4 1⁄2× 12. New concepts or types have to be expressed in mm when mounted in combination with new types/concept of tyres. F.E.: 365 × 150 TD, CT 450 × 150, PAX 145 × 360 A (Pict.1) Most of the times, also the type of rim edge is mentioned: F.E.: 4 1⁄2 ×B 12, 5 1⁄2 J × 13 (see chapter 2.11.0 “Different Rim Edges). Symmetrical rims are indicated with an additional “s” F.E.: 4 1⁄2 ×J 13 - S The symbol “×” indicates a “one-piece” rim: F.E.: 4 1⁄2× 12 The symbol “-” indicates a “multi-piece” rim: F.E.: 15 - 5 1⁄2 F SDC. The “DIN” and “ETRTO” sizing are putting fi rst the rim width followed by the diameter: F.E.: 6 J × 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Bendix ABS-6 Advanced with ESP Stability System
    Bendix® ABS-6 Advanced with ESP® Stability System Frequently Asked Questions to Help You Make an Intelligent Investment in Stability Contents: Key FAQs (Start here!)………….. Pg. 2 Stability Definitions …………….. Pg. 6 System Comparison ……………. Pg. 7 Function/Performance ………….. Pg. 9 Value ………………………………. Pg. 12 Availability/Applications ……….. Pg. 14 Vehicle System Integration …….. Pg. 16 Safety ………………………………. Pg. 17 Take the Next Step ………………. Pg. 18 Please note: This document is designed to assist you in the stability system decision process, not to serve as a performance guarantee. No system will prevent 100% of the incidents you may experience. This information is subject to change without notice © 2007 Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, a member of the Knorr-Bremse Group. All Rights Reserved. 03/07 1 Key FAQs What is roll stability? Roll stability counteracts the tendency of a vehicle, or vehicle combination, to tip over while changing direction (typically while turning). The lateral (side) acceleration creates a force at the center of gravity (CG), “pushing” the truck/tractor-trailer horizontally. The friction between the tires and the road opposes that force. If the lateral force is high enough, one side of the vehicle may begin to lift off the ground potentially causing the vehicle to roll over. Factors influencing the sensitivity of a vehicle to lateral forces include: the load CG height, load offset, road adhesion, suspension stiffness, frame stiffness and track width of vehicle. What is yaw stability? Yaw stability counteracts the tendency of a vehicle to spin about its vertical axis. During operation, if the friction between the road surface and the tractor’s tires is not sufficient to oppose lateral (side) forces, one or more of the tires can slide, causing the truck/tractor to spin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Control Defined
    RIDE CONTROL DEFINED According to Newton's First Law, a moving body will continue moving in a straight line until it is acted upon by another force. Newton's Second Law states that for each action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In the case of the automobile, whether the disturbing force is in the form of a wind-gust, an incline in the roadway, or the cornering forces produced by tires, the force causing the action and the force resisting the action will always be in balance. Many things affect vehicles in motion. Weight distribution, speed, road conditions and wind are some factors that affect how vehicles travel down the highway. Under all these variables however, the vehicle suspension system including the shocks, struts and springs must be in good condition. Worn suspension components may reduce the stability of the vehicle and reduce driver control. They may also accelerate wear on other suspension components. Replacing worn or inadequate shocks and struts will help maintain good ride control as they: Control spring and suspension movement Provide consistent handling and braking Prevent premature tire wear Help keep the tires in contact with the road Maintain dynamic wheel alignment Control vehicle bounce, roll, sway, dive and acceleration squat Reduce wear on other vehicle systems Promote even and balanced tire and brake wear Reduce driver fatigue Suspension concepts and components have changed and will continue to change dramatically, but the basic objective remains the same: 1. Provide steering stability with good handling characteristics 2. Maximize passenger comfort Achieving these objectives under all variables of a vehicle in motion is called ride control 1 BASIC TERMINOLOGY To begin this training program, you need to possess some very basic information.
    [Show full text]
  • Less Mower Deck) Equipment for Base Machine
    JOHN DEERE TURF & UTILITY PRODUCTS COMMERCIAL FRONT MOWERS AND EQUIPMENT 1550 TerrainCut Commercial Front Mower (Less Mower Deck) Equipment for Base Machine 24.2 HP (17.8 kW), gross SAE mounted) Low Oil Pressure Warning Light J1995, PS 23x10.50-12 In. 4PR Turf (std) Hydraulic Oil Temp. Light and Rated at 3000 rpm Drive Tires Alarm PTO Shutdown Diesel Engine 77 cu. in. (1.27 18x8.50-8 In. 4PR Turf Folding Two Post ROPS (Roll- L) Steering Tires (2WD) or Over Protective Structure) Three Cylinder Liquid-Cooled 18x8.50-10 In. 4PR Turf and Retractable Seat Belt Dual Element Air Cleaner Steering Tires (4WD) Cast Iron Rear Bumper Air Restriction Indicator Transmission Oil Cooler Operator Training Video 12V Electric Start Individual Turn Assist Brakes 12V Auxilary Power Outlet Internal Wet Disk Brakes 75 AMP Automotive Alternator Master Stop Brake 16 U.S. Gallon Fuel Capacity Dual Hydraulic Implement Two Pedal Hydrostatic Foot Lift Cylinders Control Less Mower Deck Hydrostatic Transmission Hourmeter Hydrostatic Front Wheel Drive Fuel Gauge Hydrostatic Power Steering Tilt Steering Wheel Differential Front Wheel Lock PTO Drvien Implements Front Lights (steering column Operator Presence System List Price Attachment Suggested Code Identifier Description USD ($) Select One Code From Each Required Category BASE MACHINE F.O.B. Raleigh, North Carolina 2400TC 1550 TerrainCut Commercial Front Mower (Less Mower Deck) 19,899.00 DESTINATION North America 001A United States and Canada In Base Price DRIVE SYSTEM 1190 Two Wheel Drive In Base Price 1191 Four Wheel Drive (Full Time or On Demand) 2,913.00 Standard on the 1575, 1580, and 1585 TerrainCut Commercial Front Mowers.
    [Show full text]
  • TRACTOR 4100 Serial # 1001-1501
    OWNER/OPERATOR’S MANUAL TRACTOR 4100 Serial # 1001-1501 REVISED 04-18-07 2ND EDITION 09.10026 Venture Products Inc. Orrville, OH Orrville, OH www.ventrac.com TO THE OWNER Congratulations on the purchase of a new VENTRAC 4100! The purpose of this manual is to assist you in its safe and effective operation and maintenance. With proper usage and care, the Tractor will provide many years of service. Please read and understand this manual entirely before using the Tractor. Keep this manual on file for future reference. Always give Model and Serial # when ordering service parts. Please fill in the following information for future reference: Date of Purchase: Month _________________ Day __________ Year ____________ Model Number: _______________________________________________________ Serial Number: ________________________________________________________ Dealer: ______________________________________________________________ Dealer Address: _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Dealer Phone Number: _________________________________________________ Dealer FAX Number: ___________________________________________________ Venture Products Inc. reserves the right to make changes in design or specifications without incurring obligation to make like changes on previously manufactured products. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SECTION A Description .....................................A-1 Specifications ...................................A-2 SAFETY SECTION B Safety Symbols ..................................B-1
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Load Transfer
    Vehicle Load Transfer Wm Harbin Technical Director BND TechSource 1 Vehicle Load Transfer Part I General Load Transfer 2 Factors in Vehicle Dynamics . Within any modern vehicle suspension there are many factors to consider during design and development. Factors in vehicle dynamics: • Vehicle Configuration • Vehicle Type (i.e. 2 dr Coupe, 4dr Sedan, Minivan, Truck, etc.) • Vehicle Architecture (i.e. FWD vs. RWD, 2WD vs.4WD, etc.) • Chassis Architecture (i.e. type: tubular, monocoque, etc. ; material: steel, aluminum, carbon fiber, etc. ; fabrication: welding, stamping, forming, etc.) • Front Suspension System Type (i.e. MacPherson strut, SLA Double Wishbone, etc.) • Type of Steering Actuator (i.e. Rack and Pinion vs. Recirculating Ball) • Type of Braking System (i.e. Disc (front & rear) vs. Disc (front) & Drum (rear)) • Rear Suspension System Type (i.e. Beam Axle, Multi-link, Solid Axle, etc.) • Suspension/Braking Control Systems (i.e. ABS, Electronic Stability Control, Electronic Damping Control, etc.) 3 Factors in Vehicle Dynamics . Factors in vehicle dynamics (continued): • Vehicle Suspension Geometry • Vehicle Wheelbase • Vehicle Track Width Front and Rear • Wheels and Tires • Vehicle Weight and Distribution • Vehicle Center of Gravity • Sprung and Unsprung Weight • Springs Motion Ratio • Chassis Ride Height and Static Deflection • Turning Circle or Turning Radius (Ackermann Steering Geometry) • Suspension Jounce and Rebound • Vehicle Suspension Hard Points: • Front Suspension • Scrub (Pivot) Radius • Steering (Kingpin) Inclination
    [Show full text]
  • Formula SAE Interchangeable Independent Rear Suspension Design
    Formula SAE Interchangeable Independent Rear Suspension Design Sponsored by the Cal Poly Formula SAE team A Final Report for Reid Olsen, FSAE Technical Director By: Suspension Solutions Design team Mike McCune - [email protected] Daniel Nunes - [email protected] Mike Patton - [email protected] Courtney Richardson - [email protected] Evan Sparer - [email protected] 2009 ME 428/481/470 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 7 FSAE Team History and Opportunity ......................................................................................................... 8 Formal Problem Definition ...................................................................................................................... 10 Objectives/Specification Development ................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2: Background ............................................................................................................................... 13 Solid Rear Axle Design ............................................................................................................................. 14 Tire Research ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Llllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllll!!!)Llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll United States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 5,593,005 Kullmann Et Al
    llllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllll!!!)llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll United States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 5,593,005 Kullmann et al. [45] Date of Patent: Jan. 14, 1997 [54] CALIPER-TYPE DISC BRAKE WITH 4,811,822 3/1989 Estaque. STEPPED ROTOR 4,930,606 6/1990 Sporzynski et a1. 5,010,985 4/1991 Russell et a1. [75] Inventors: Bernhard Kullmann, Rochester Hills; 510221500 6/1991 Wang - Mich.;Joerg Scheibel,Larry Masserant, Auburn Hills’ Frankfurt, both of FOREIGN PATENTEmmons DOCUMENTS............................... .. Germany; Daniel Keck, Westland; Werner Gottschalk, Auburn Hills’ both 1336878 of 1962 France ................................ .. 188/724 of Mich 0329831 8/1989 Germany ............................ .. 188/73.1 199785 3/1966 U.S.S.R. _ . 0199785 7/1967 U.S.S.R. [73] Assrgnee. ITThAutomotlve, Inc., Auburn Hills, 1019094 2/1966 United Kingdom _ MIC - 1108916 10/1968 United Kingdom. [21] AppL NOJ 486,457 Primary Examiner--Robert J. 0138116111161‘ Assistant Examiner—Chris Schwartz [22] Filed: Jun. 7, 1995 Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Thomas N. Tworney; J. Gordon [51] Int. Cl.6 ........................... .. F16D 55/22; F16D 65/12 Lew“ [52] US. Cl. ........................................ .. 188/724; 188/731 [57] ABSTRACT [58] Fleld of searlcgs Adisc brake for the wheel of a motor vehicle includes a rotor ' ’ '1’92/65 ’85 AA’ 66 70 15’ mounted to the wheel, and a caliper straddling the rotor and ’ ’ ’ ' supporting a brake pad on either side thereof. In order to R f C-t d accommodate packaging constraints within the wheel’s rim, [56] e erences l e the outboard pad and the rotor’s outboard friction surface are US. PATENT DOCUMENTS both positioned radially inwardly of the inboard pad and .
    [Show full text]