Non-Standard Employment and Wages in Australia
Non-standard Employment and Wages in Australia Inga Laß and Mark Wooden Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne Paper presented at the 2019 RBA Conference, Sydney, 4-5 April 2019 Acknowledgements This paper uses unit record data from Release 17 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey (doi:10.26193/PTKLYP). The HILDA Survey is conducted by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research on behalf of the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Australian Government, DSS or the Melbourne Institute. We also gratefully acknowledge the Australian Bureau of Statistics for the provision of access to various cross-section data sources (via www.abs.gov.au.au) that are also used in this paper. Finally, we acknowledge the Australian Research Council which, through its Discovery Projects scheme (project # DP160103171), provides the funding to cover the salary costs of Inga Laß. 1 Introduction Recent decades have seen increased concern, both in Australia and elsewhere, about changes in the nature of work, and more specifically growth in non-standard forms of employment (such as part-time and casual work), and what this implies for the quality of jobs (e.g., ACTU, 2018; Buddelmeyer et al., 2015; Green et al., 2010; Kalleberg et al., 2000; McGovern et al., 2004; Richardson & Law, 2009; Watson, 2005). In particular, non-standard forms of employment are typically seen as ‘precarious’, with adverse consequences for workers flowing from greater economic insecurity (e.g., Campbell & Burgess, 2018; Markey & McIvor, 2018; Rogers, 1989; Tweedie, 2013; Vosko, 2006).
[Show full text]