MIDTERM EVALUATION of the RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME of BULGARIA Covered Period: 2007-2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MIDTERM EVALUATION of the RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME of BULGARIA Covered Period: 2007-2009 Elaboration of ongoing and mid-term evaluation of the RDP 2007-2010, Bulgaria The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development BULGARIA Ongoing and Mid-Term Evaluation of the RDP 2007- 2013 MIDTERM EVALUATION OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF BULGARIA Covered Period: 2007-2009 30th December 2010 The European Agricultural A project implemented by Agrotec SpA Fund for Rural Development: Europe investing in rural areas MIDTERM EVALUATION OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF BULGARIA 1 Elaboration of ongoing and mid-term evaluation of the RDP 2007-2010, Bulgaria Abbreviations AWU Annual Work Unit BG-RDP Rural Development Programme of Bulgaria The EU Common Agriculture Policy having two main pillars: Market Organization and Rural CAP Development CEQ Common Evaluation Questions CMEF Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework ESU Economic Size Unit GAEC Good Agriculture And Environmental Conditions HNV High nature value LFA Less favored areas MA Managing Authority MIS Monitoring and Information System N 2000 Natura 2000 compensatory payments either in agriculture or forestry sector NAAS/RAAS National/Regional Agriculture Advisory Service NVZ Nitrate Vulnerable Zone OER Ongoing evaluation report as set in CR 1698/2005 SAPS Single Area-based Payment Schemes SFA-PA State Fund Agriculture – Paying Agency SGM Standard Gross Margin MIDTERM EVALUATION OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF BULGARIA 2 Elaboration of ongoing and mid-term evaluation of the RDP 2007-2010, Bulgaria List of evaluated BG-RDP measures N M Code MEASURE NAME 1 112 Setting up of young farmers 2 121 Modernisation of agricultural holdings 3 141 Supporting Semi-Subsistence Farms Undergoing Restructuring 4 143 Provision of farm advisory and extension services in Bulgaria and Romania (According to Annex VIII. (years 2007-2009)) 5 211 Natural handicap payments to farmers in mountain areas 6 212 Payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain areas 7 214 Agri-environmental payments 8 223 First afforestation of non-agricultural land 9 226 Restoring forestry potential and introducing prevention actions 10 321 Basic services for the economy and rural population 11 322 Village renewal and development 12 431.2 Sub-measure 2: Acquisition of Skills and Animation for Potential Local Action Groups 13 511 Technical Assistance 14 611 National Complements to Direct Payments MIDTERM EVALUATION OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF BULGARIA 3 Elaboration of ongoing and mid-term evaluation of the RDP 2007-2010, Bulgaria Contents A BBREVIATIONS ........................................................................... 2 L IST OF EVALUATED BG- RDP MEASURES ......................................... 3 1 E XECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................. 20 1.1. Purpose of the report ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.2. Evaluation methodology.................................................................................................................... 20 Evaluation questions ................................................................................................................................. 20 Evaluation criteria ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Data collection ........................................................................................................................................... 20 1.3. The NRDP objectives and its implementation context ...................................................................... 21 NRDP objectives ........................................................................................................................................ 21 NRDP implementation context .................................................................................................................. 22 1.4. Conclusions and recommendations .................................................................................................. 23 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................ 23 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................... 29 2 I NTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 37 2.1. Purpose of the report ........................................................................................................................ 37 2.2. Structure of the report ...................................................................................................................... 37 3 T H E E V A L U A T I O N C ONTEXT ..................................................... 38 3.1. BGRDP context................................................................................................................................... 38 3.1.0. EU Programmes in BG in the evaluated 2007-2009 period ....................................................... 38 3.1.1. National agriculture context ...................................................................................................... 39 3.2. Description of the evaluation process: Recapitulation of the ToR, purpose and scope of the evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.2.0. Evaluation process ..................................................................................................................... 43 3.2.1. Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................... 45 3.3. Brief outline of previous evaluations related to the programme ..................................................... 46 3.3.0. Ex-Ante evaluation of 2007-2013 NRDP .................................................................................... 46 MIDTERM EVALUATION OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF BULGARIA 4 Elaboration of ongoing and mid-term evaluation of the RDP 2007-2010, Bulgaria 3.3.1. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of NRDP 2007-2013 .............................................. 49 3.3.2. On-going Evaluation Report 2008 ............................................................................................. 51 3.3.3. On-going Evaluation Report 2009 ............................................................................................. 55 4 M ETHODOLOGICAL A PPROACH .................................................. 57 4.1. Explanation of the evaluation design and the methods used ........................................................... 57 4.2. Description of key terms of Programme Specific and Common Evaluation Questions......... 57 4.3. Evaluation and judgment Criteria ...................................................................................................... 59 4.4. Data sources of and techniques for data collection .......................................................................... 60 4.5. Techniques for replying to the Evaluation Questions and arriving at conclusions ........................... 64 4.6. Problems or limitations of the methodological approach ................................................................ 64 5 D ESCRIPTION OF P ROGRAMME , M EASURES AND B UDGET ............... 65 5.1. Programme implementation arrangements ..................................................................................... 65 5.1.0. Actors involved with Programme management and implementation: ..................................... 66 5.1.1. Implementation procedures for the measures ......................................................................... 69 5.1.2. Procedures ensuring Publicity and Transparency ..................................................................... 70 5.2. Composition of the programme, description of priorities and measures ......................................... 71 5.3. Intervention logic of single measures................................................................................................ 75 5.3.0. M111 Training, Information and Diffusion of Knowledge ......................................................... 75 5.3.1. M112 Setting up of young farmers ............................................................................................ 77 5.3.2. M121 Modernisation of agricultural holdings ........................................................................... 79 5.3.3. M122 Improving the Economic Value of Forests ...................................................................... 83 5.3.4. M123 Adding Value to Agricultural and Forestry Products ....................................................... 84 5.3.5. M141 Semi-subsistence farming ............................................................................................... 86 5.3.6. M142 Setting up of Producer Groups ........................................................................................ 87 5.3.7. M143 Provision of farm advisory and extension services ......................................................... 89 5.3.8. M211 Natural handicap payments to farmers in mountain areas and M212 Payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain areas .................................................................. 90 MIDTERM
Recommended publications
  • Good Practices in Target Libraries from Plovdiv District
    Good Practices in Target Libraries from Plovdiv District 4 September 2011, Plovdiv, Ivan Vazov Public Library LIST OF MEETING PARTICIPANTS No. Name Organization/Institution Settlement 1. Ana Belcheva Municipal administration Rakovski Rakovski 2. Angelina Stavreva Ivan Vazov Public Library, Methodology Dept. Plovdiv 3. Ani Sirakova Library at Sts. Cyril and Methodius PC Parvomay 4. Anka Bekirova Library at Iskra Public Chitalishte Kaloyanovo 5. Apostol Stanev Library at Sokolov Public Chitalishte Panicheri 6. Valya Stoyanova Library at N.Y. Vaptsarov Public Chitalishte Stamboliyski 7. Vasilka Bahchevanska Library at Vasil Kolev Public Chitalishte Trilistnik 8. Vaska Mincheva Library at Probuda Public Chitalishte Krichim 9. Vaska Tonova Ivan Vazov Public Library, Children’s Dept. Plovdiv 10. Velizar Petrov Regional Information Center Plovdiv 11. Vera Endreva Library at Hristo Botev Public Chitalishte Zlatitrap 12. Vera Kirilova NAWV Plovdiv 13. Gergana Vulcheva Library at Ivan Vazov Public Chitalishte Iskra 14. Gyurgena Madzhirova Library at Lyuben Karavelov Public Chitalishte Kurtovo Konare 15. Daniela Kostova Municipal administration Asenovgrad Asenovgrad 16. Darina Markova Library at Hristo Botev Public Chitalishte Dabene 17. Dzhamal Kichukov “Zora” Library Laki 18. Dimitar Minev Ivan Vazov Public Library, Director Plovdiv 19. Dobrinka Batinkova Library at N.Y. Vaptsarov Public Chitalishte Kuklen 20. Donka Kumanova Library at Sts. Cyril and Methodius PC Shishmantsi 21. Elena Atanasova Library at Ivan Vazov Public Chitalishte Plovdiv 22. E lena Batinkova Library at Samorazvitie Public Chitalishte Brestnik 23. Elena Mechkova Library at N.Y. Vaptsarov Public Chitalishte Topolovo 24. Elena Raychinova Library at Ivan Vazov Public Chitalishte Sopot 25. Emilia Angelova Library at Sts. Cyril and Methodius PC Parvomay page 1 No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Change in a Child Is a Change for Bulgaria Annual Report 2015
    A CHANGE IN A CHILD IS A CHANGE FOR BULGARIA ANNUAL REPORT 2015 ABOUT NNC The National Network for Children (NNC) is an alliance of 131 civil society organisations and supporters, working with and for children and families across the whole country. Promotion, protection and observing the rights of the child are part of the key principles that unite us. We do believe that all policies and practices, that affect directly or indirectly children should be based first and foremost on the best interests of the child. Furthermore they should be planned, implemented and monitored with a clear assessment of the impact on children and young people, and with their active participation. OUR VISION The National Network for Children works towards a society where every child has their own family and enjoys the best opportunities for life and development. There is a harmony between the sectoral policies for the child and the family, and the child rights and welfare are guaranteed. OUR MISSION The National Network for Children advocates for the rights and welfare of children by bringing together and developing a wide, socially significant network of organisations and supporters. OUR GOALS • Influence for better policies for children and families; • Changing public attitudes to the rights of the child; • Development of a model for child participation; • Development of the National Network for Children; • Improving the capacity of the Network and its member organisations; • Promotion of the public image of the National Network for Children. II | Annual Report 2015 | www.nmd.bg Dear friends, In 2015 the National Network for Children made a big step forward and reached its 10th anniversary which we are celebrating today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sofia Model”: Creation out of Chaos
    The “Sofia Model”: Creation out of chaos Pathways to creative and knowledge-based regions ISBN 978-90-75246-62-9 Printed in the Netherlands by Xerox Service Center, Amsterdam Edition: 2007 Cartography lay-out and cover: Puikang Chan, AMIDSt, University of Amsterdam All publications in this series are published on the ACRE-website http://www2.fmg.uva.nl/acre and most are available on paper at: Dr. Olga Gritsai, ACRE project manager University of Amsterdam Amsterdam institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies (AMIDSt) Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130 NL-1018 VZ Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel. +31 20 525 4044 +31 23 528 2955 Fax +31 20 525 4051 E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Amsterdam institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies (AMIDSt), University of Amsterdam 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication can be reproduced in any form, by print or photo print, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. The “Sofia Model”: Creation out of chaos Pathways to creative and knowledge-based regions ACRE report 2.10 Evgenii Dainov Ivan Nachev Maria Pancheva Vasil Garnizov Accommodating Creative Knowledge – Competitiveness of European Metropolitan Regions within the Enlarged Union Amsterdam 2007 AMIDSt, University of Amsterdam ACRE ACRE is the acronym for the international research project Accommodating Creative Knowledge – Competitiveness of European Metropolitan Regions within the enlarged Union. The project is funded under the priority 7 ‘Citizens and Governance in a knowledge-based society within the Sixth Framework Programme of the EU (contract no. 028270). Coordination: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Process: Program Data
    FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data Cover.indd 1 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PUBLICATIONS 1 Donor’s Brief 2 Initiator’s Guide 3 Coordinator’s Guide 4 Moderator’s Guide 5 Forum Program Data 6 Forum Films Publisher: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) 3003 Berne www.deza.ch Concept and coordination: Tulum Ltd. CH – 6987 Caslano www.tulum-consult.com The information in this brochure was provided by: Balkan Assist Association, Sofia Foundation for Local Government Reform, Sofia Agency for Socioeconomic Analyses, Sofia Industrieconsult, Sofia Business Center, Svishtov Znanie Association, Lovech NGO Club, Targovishte National Alliance for Volunteer Action, Plovdiv Regional Association of Municipalities “Trakya”, Stara Zagora Center for Sustainable Development of Teteven Municipality, Teteven Compilation and processing: Diana Andreeva and Irena Boneva Summary of the information: Maya Krasteva Introduction texts: Ginka Kapitanova, Iva Taralezhkova and Alex Melzer Layout: Mark Manion, Commusication Arts Orders: SDC Distribution Center Telephone: +41 31 322 44 12 Fax: +41 31 324 13 48 E-mail: [email protected] © SDC 2007 FP Program Data Cover.indd 2 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data.indd 1 11/20/07 8:00:27 AM CONTEnts PROGRAM OVERVIEW ...........................................7 THE SDC FORUM PROGRAM IN BULGARIA 2000–2007..................7 Summary Table 1 – Program Outcome and Volume ..................9 Summary Table 2 – Timetable
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 4.0 License
    CHAPTER 14 Choral Societies and National Mobilization in Nineteenth-Century Bulgaria Ivanka Vlaeva Compared with the histories of many national movements in nineteenth- century Europe, in Bulgaria the industrial revolution was delayed and mod- ern culture arrived late. Lagging behind most other Europeans, the Bulgarian population had to compensate for its lack of modern cultural development. Thus, one important characteristic of Bulgarian culture is its evolution at accelerated rates. Before liberation in 1878, for almost five centuries the Bulgarian lands were under Ottoman rule, without their own governmental and religious institu- tions. Foreign rule, a feudal economy, a weak middle class, and the absence of national cultural institutions were serious obstacles to the development of a new culture on the western European model. The most important aims for the Bulgarians (led by educators, intellectuals, and revolutionists) were to struggle politically against Ottoman governance, economically for new industrial pro- cesses in the Ottoman Empire, and culturally for a national identity. The lead- ers of the revolutionary movement called for a struggle not against the Turkish people, but against Ottoman rulers and foreign clerks.1 These historical processes resemble those elsewhere in Europe, especially in the central and southeastern regions. Nineteenth-century Bulgarian culture therefore needs to be considered along with that of the Balkans more gener- ally because of the cultural similarities, interactions, and fluctuations in this region.2 The establishment of a new economy and the fight for modern educa- tion were among the main priorities in Bulgarian communities. The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries are the so-called Revival period in Bulgarian cultural development, strongly influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Republic of Bulgaria
    REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2008 1. Section: Traditional rites and feasts Project name: "Nestinarstvo, messages from the past: the Panagyr of Saints Constantine and Elena in the village of Bulgari" Nominating institution: Regional Historic Museum - Bourgas Bearer: A group from v. Bulgari, Tzarevo Municipality (headed by Michail Michailov) 2. Section: Traditional rites and feasts Project name: "Kalusha – lond-standing tradition kept for the generations to come" Nominating institution: People’s Chitalishte (Community Cultural Center) "Nicola Y. Vaptzarov", v. Hurletz, Kozlodui Municipality, District Vratza Bearer: "Kalushari" group for authentic folklore 3. Section: Traditional rites and feasts Project name – "Traditional Vasilitsa Wedding" Nominating institution: People’s Chitalishte (Community Cultural Center) "Geo Milev”, town of Momin Prohod, Kostenetz Municipality, District Sofia Bearer: "Momin prohod" folklore ensemble 4. Section: Traditional crafts and traditional production of home-made objects or products/ gun smithery Project name: "Dyanko Dyankov – master of ancient weapons from the town of Apriltsi" Nominating institution: People’s Chitalishte (Community Cultural Center) "Prosveta", town of Apriltsi and Museum of Art Crafts and Applied Arts, town of Troyan, District Lovech Bearer: Dyanko Dyankov (weapon craft master, knife master, also crafting tin alloy vessels) 5. Section: Traditional singing and music playing/ two part women’s or man’s folk singing from the town of Nedelino
    [Show full text]
  • Plovdiv Investment & Technology Destination 2019 Investment & Technology Destination Plovdiv
    Doing Business Labor Supply Education & in Bulgaria Training Manufacturing Local IT & BPO Economy Property Major Public Market Investors Services Attracting Places to Quality of Life Talent Visit PLOVDIV INVESTMENT & TECHNOLOGY DESTINATION 2019 INVESTMENT & TECHNOLOGY DESTINATION PLOVDIV PUBLISHED BY PLOVDIV MUNICIPALITY COPYRIGHT 2019 PLOVDIV MUNICIPALITY WELCOME TO PLOVDIV As a mayor of Plovdiv, I am proud and ‣ Plovdiv is the “industrial heart” of privileged to open the 2019 edition of Bulgaria with over 75 000 jobs in the “Investment & Technology manufacturing. Destination Plovdiv” catalog. ‣ Trakia Economic Zone hosts over This may be your first encounter with 100 multinational and local Plovdiv or you may update previously producers. known facts about the region. In all cases, it is just the first step in a ‣ A local economy with predominant journey that I and my team will join business profile - 70% of all value you in. added in manufacturing and B2B services. ‣ IT&BPO are the fastest growing sectors - outnumbering 7000 jobs and a 15% annual growth of productivity. ‣ City’s pool of talent is expanding steadily - some 40 000 students, Eng. IVAN TOTEV positive migration balance, growing Mayor of Plovdiv expat community. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOING BUSINESS IN BULGARIA MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS 1 INVESTMENT CLIMATE LABOR SUPPLY POPULATION 2 WORKFORCE 3 EDUCATION & TRAINING LOCAL ECONOMY VOLUME & STRUCTURE 4 INVESTMENT & PRODUCTIVITY IT&BPO INDUSTRY ZOOM 5 WAGES ECOSYSTEM ATTRACTING TALENT TO PLOVDIV COST OF LIVING 6 STARTING A BUSINESS
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Sustainable Electronic Reporting and Monitoring System
    Municipal Asset Management System Trip Report, Bulgaria, 19August – 28 August 2006 Author: Gordon M. Cressman RTI International * 3040 Cornwallis Road Tel: +1 919 541-6363 Fax: +1 919 541-6621 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.rti.org Date of Publication: 2 September 2006 Submitted to: KIRIL KIRYAKOV, CTO, DEMOCRACY AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE, USAID/BULGARIA RTI Project No.: 0207449.802 Project Name: LOCAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES - BULGARIA Client: AID - EUROPE/NIS REGION Contract No: EEU-I-802-99-0014-00 Mission: BULGARIA Program Title: Local Gov't Strengthening & Municipal Development Pillar: Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Strategic Objective: 183-0230 Local Governance More Effective and Accountable * RTI International is a trade name of the Research Triangle Institute TRIP REPORT 19 AUGUST – 28 AUGUST 2006 2 SEPTEMBER 2006 Abbreviations ALM.................. Application Lifecycle Management BGN................. Bulgarian Leva (currency) CD-ROM.......... Compact Disc Read Only Memory CDRW.............. Compact Disc Read Write CPRA............... Cadastre and Property Register Act CRAS............... System for Civil Registration and Administrative CSC ................. Citizen Service Center DVD-R ............. Digital Versatile Disc Recordable format EGN................. Bulgarian national identification number for individual citizens ESGRAON ...... Unified System for Civil Registration and Service of Citizens EU .................... European Union FLGR............... Foundation for Local Government Reform GB...................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sofia City-Region
    The Sofia City-Region Development Path and Current Situation ISBN: Printed in the Netherlands by Edition: 2006 All publications in this series in this series are published on the ACRE-website http://www2.fmg.uva.nl/acre and are available on paper at: University of Amsterdam Amsterdam institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies (AMIDSt) Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130 1018 VZ Amsterdam the Netherlands tel: +31(0)20-525 4063 fax: +31(0)20-525 4051 e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Amsterdam institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduce in any form, by print of photo print, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. The Sofia City-Region Development Path and Current Situation ACRE report [No.] Evgenii Dainov Ivan Nachev Maria Pancheva Vasil Garnizov Accommodating Creative Knowledge – Competitiveness of European Metropolitan Regions within the Enlarged Union Amsterdam 2006 AMIDSt, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam ACRE ACRE is the acronym for the international research project Accommodating Creative Knowledge – Competitiveness of European Metropolitan Regions within the enlarged Union. The project is funded under the priority 7 ‘Citizens and Governance in a knowledge-based society within the Sixth Framework Programme of the EU (contract no. 028270). Management team Sako Musterd (Project Coördinator) University
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage
    Chapter 17: Cultural Heritage URS-EIA-REP-202375 Table of Contents 17 Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................... 17-1 17.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Scoping ............................................................................................................ 17-2 17.3 Spatial and Temporal Boundaries ........................................................................ 17-4 17.3.1 Terrestrial Cultural Heritage Study and Survey Areas ............................... 17-4 17.3.2 Marine Cultural Heritage Study and Survey Areas ................................... 17-5 17.4 Baseline Data .................................................................................................. 17-21 17.4.1 Methodology and Data ........................................................................ 17-21 17.4.2 Secondary Data .................................................................................. 17-21 17.4.2.1 Desk-based Research .................................................................. 17-21 17.4.2.2 Reporting Methodology ............................................................... 17-23 17.4.2.3 Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................. 17-23 17.4.3 Data Gaps .......................................................................................... 17-25 17.4.4 Primary Data/Baseline Surveys ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007 Published by WCIF Photos: WCIF Photo Archive Graphic Design and Layout: ISKAR Publishing House
    MMT@Kå1DONQS Workshop for Civic Initiatives Foundation Content 1. Letter from the Director ................................................... 6 2. The Foundation ............................................................... 11 3. Donors and Supporters ................................................... 17 4. Main Areas of Activity .................................................... 21 4.1. Financial Support for Civic Organizations .................. 21 4.2. Capacity Building Work ............................................... 32 4.3. WCIF Initiatives ........................................................... 37 4.4. Cooperation Development .......................................... 40 4.5. Local Philanthropy Development ................................ 43 5. Organizational Development .......................................... 49 6. Grants’ List ..................................................................... 52 7. Financial Report ............................................................. 60 5 Letter from 1 the Director 6 1. Letter from the Director Iliyana Nikolova Potlatch is a North-American In- signs of this are in the use of more Executive Director dian custom where the chieftain professional mechanisms and ap- gives away all his possessions to proach to making donations, both on his guests. He loses all his material the individual line, and in corporative wealth, yet wins the respect of the philanthropy. The factors for this pro- tribe and the benevolence of the fessionalization are diverse but all of gods. them have
    [Show full text]