Roland Barthes Dialectician? in the Final Instance?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mythologies of the World: a Guide to Sources
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 198 541 CS 206 121 AUTHOR Smith, Ron TITLE Mythologies of the World: A Guide toSources. INSTITUTICN National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. TEPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-3222-7 PUB DATE 81 NOTE 358p. AVAILABLE FRCM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 32227, $9.75 non-member, $8.50 member). EDRS PRICE MF01/PC15 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cultural Awareness: *Cultural Background: Cultural Interrelationships: *Folk Culture: Higher Education: *Mythology: Popular Culture: Resource Materials: Secondary Education: *Symbols (Literary) : *World Literature ABSTRACT This book surveys the important available bockson mythologies cf all parts of the globe and thecultural contexts from which the mythological traditions emerged.Written as a series of bibliographic essays, the guide opens witha description of major reference sources encompassing many cultures,as well as those tracing particular themes (such as that of thecreation) across cultures. The other bibliographicessays discuss sources for studying prehistoric mythologies, the mythologies of West Asianpeoples (Mesopotamian, Biblical, Islamic, and others),South and East Asian mythologies, European mythologies, American Indianmythologies (North, Central, and South American), African mythologies, and the mythologies cf the Pacific and Australia.An appendix on contemporary mythology--mainly American--discussesa wide range of works that examine the beliefs, traditions, and dreams thatmanifest themselves in spectator .sports, politics, -
By Andrew Leak
BARTHES MYTHOLOGIES by Andrew Leak critical guides to French texts Critical Guides to French Texts 107 Barthes: Mythologies Critical Guides to French Texts EDITED BY ROGER LITTLE, WOLFGANG VAN EMDEN, DAVID WILLIAMS BARTHES Mythologies Andrew Leak Senior Lecturer in French, University College London Grant & Cutler Ltd 1994 © Grant & Cutler Ltd 1994 ISBN 0 7293 0370 5 I.S.B.N. 84-401-2127-X DEPÓSITO LEGAL: V. 4.729 - 1994 Printed in Spain by Artes Gráficas Soler, S. A. - La Olivereta, 28 - 46018 Valencia for GRANT & CUTLER LTD 55-57 GREAT MARLBOROUGH STREET, LONDON W1V 2AY Contents Prefatory Remarks 7 1. The Life of Signs 8 i) Lutter avec une certaine innocence des objets 8 ii) Définir d’une façon méthodique le mythe con- temporain 16 2. Ideology and Myth 23 i) Le monde commence là où le sens finit 23 ii) La déperdition de la qualité historique des choses 26 iii) Cet ‘ennemi’ un peu mythique 32 3. Literature and Myth 39 i) La Littérature vient de condamner un homme à l’échafaud 39 ii) Racine est Racine 44 iii) Ce pléonasme d’intentions 47 iv) Une réconciliation du réel et des hommes 51 4. Tactics without a strategy 56 i) Soyez sûrs que le marxiste Lefebvre comprend parfaitement. 58 ii) Lire ‘Mythologies’ comme un roman de Flaubert 62 iii) Denotation/Detonation 67 5. Mythology Today 71 Select Bibliography 81 Prefatory Remarks T w enty -fiv e years after its first publication, Mythologies is still the most widely read of all Barthes’s works. It gained for its author the reputation of being a ‘committed’ writer: a de scription which sat uneasily on Barthes’s shoulders in later years. -
Roland Barthes Is One of the Most Well-Known Semioticians Outside Academic Circles
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Middlesex University Research Repository The Deaths of Semiology and Mythoclasm: Barthes and Media Studies Paul Cobley Abstract: Roland Barthes is one of the most well-known semioticians outside academic circles. That knowledge is sometimes based on misconceptions about his theory of signs, extrapolated from Saussure. This article will offer an outline of Roland Barthes’ sign theory, demonstrating the ways that it is derived and adapted from Saussure and how Saussure is refracted through Barthes’ readings of other linguists. It will look in particular at Barthes’ innovations in sign theory: denotation, connotation and metalanguage, as well as his extension of linguistic thinking to analyse nonverbal modes. It will also discuss Barthes’ notion of ‘myth’ and its influence as a concept. The article will consider a number of instances from media and cultural studies where Barthes’ interpretations have not only given subsequent uses of sign theory license to speculate beyond Saussure’s original linguistic bearing but have also unwittingly contributed to the stagnation of semiotic analysis. Keywords: Barthes, Saussure, semiology, mythology, semioclasm Barthes’ influence in English-speaking academia is probably most directly traceable to the publication of Annette Lavers’ and Colin Smith’s 1967a translation of Éléments de sémiologie. Indeed, scholars whose first language was neither French nor English have testified to the importance of this volume. Yet, from the vantage point of the present and, certainly from the point of view of a post-cultural studies academy, the initial circumstances in which this volume was published are worthy of note. -
Mythologies of School Reform in Online News Discourses
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Mythologies of School Reform in Online News Discourses A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Education by Nicholas Georgopoulos 2018 © Copyright by Nicholas Georgopoulos 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Mythologies of School Reform in Online News Discourses by Nicholas Georgopoulos Doctor of Philosophy in Education University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Associate Professor Thomas M. Philip, Chair This dissertation examines mainstream online discourses about school reform in the English-speaking world. Based on mythological theories of Barthes, Lévi- Strauss, and V. Propp as well as W. L. Bennett’s theory of news, I develop a method for reading mythic structures in news articles: how authors construct crises and lost objects. My findings reveal discourses centered around 1. the mythic figure of the ineffective teacher and its eradication, and 2. the school that can satisfy a student’s educational needs (including their need to enter the 21st century job market) and “learning style.” In these discourses, the lost objects generate infinite activity for actors through their perpetual failure to achieve these objects. I show how a deliberately crafted myth can offer an alternative to the “bad infinite” dy- namics of school choice and Standards and Accountability. My example for this is Sugata Mitra’s project, School in the Cloud, a low-cost network of Internet sta- tions in which children around the world teach themselves through the online en- ii couragement of educated volunteers. While Mitra and his commentators partake liberally of prevailing discourses of “digital education,” the School in the Cloud cannot be reduced to just another form of it. -
Structuralism and Semiotics
Structuralism and Semiotics We live in a world of signs, and of signs about signs. A growing awareness of this situation in the last decades of the twentieth century brought a monu- mental change in perspective on the very nature of reality. It forced us to recognise the possibility that ‘reality’ inheres not in things themselves, but in the relationships we perceive between things; not in items but in struc- tures. In exploring and seeking to further these ideas, critics turned to the methods of analysis loosely termed ‘structuralism’ and ‘semiotics’. Their work gave rise to a revolution in critical theory. This classic guide discusses the nature and development of structuralism and semiotics, calling for a new critical awareness of the ways in which we communicate and drawing attention to their implications for our society. Published in 1977 as the first volume in the New Accents series, Structural- ism and Semiotics made crucial debates in critical theory accessible to those with no prior knowledge of the field, thus enacting its own small revolution. Since then a generation of readers has used the book as an entry not only into structuralism and semiotics, but into the wide range of cultural and critical theories underpinned by these approaches. Structuralism and Semiotics remains the clearest introduction to some of the most important topics in modern critical theory. An afterword and fresh suggestions for further reading ensure that this new edition will become, like its predecessor, the essential starting point for anyone new to the field. Terence Hawkes is Emeritus Professor of English at Cardiff University. -
THE SEMIOLOGY ANALYSIS in MEDIA STUDIES - ROLAND BARTHES APPROACH - Feyrouz Bouzida Ms., Emir Abd-El-Kader University, Algeria Freeexpression [email protected]
8-10 September 2014- Istanbul, Turkey 1001 Proceedings of SOCIOINT14- International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities THE SEMIOLOGY ANALYSIS IN MEDIA STUDIES - ROLAND BARTHES APPROACH - Feyrouz Bouzida Ms., Emir Abd-el-Kader University, Algeria [email protected] Abstract Semiotics; also called semiology was first used by the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in the early twentieth century. As semiology is concerned with the general properties of sign language and other signal forms, it would be obvious to say that semiotics is the science of signs that allowed the proliferation of a number of perspectives and paved the way to other cultural phenomena that raised the study of signs through its denotative and connotative meanings. Linguists began to develop new theories of different kinds of signs and its connotative meanings. Roland Barthes was a key player in the French school structuralism semiotics .He developed his approach in denotation and connotation in relation to photographic images as a system of signs , Barthes also claimed that the semiology analysis can be applied to modes other than language . According to him the image has two layers: of what and how it is represented. He clearly describes that denotation is concrete while connotation is more complex and abstract concept. Media studies need a new spirit like the semiological method from the Barthesian perspective in the qualitative analysis level to go beyond the text or the image which is open to an infinite number of interpretations. When applying the semiological method to analyze media within its messages whether verbal or non verbal in the case of the image, Roland Barthes suggests the sign as a combination of a signifier and a signified.