DOCSLIB.ORG

04CA2008T0006.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
04CA2008T0006.Pdf Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Particular Parque Ecológico “Biosfera Maya Imperial” ÍNDICE I. DATOS GENERALES DEL PROYECTO, DEL PROMOVENTE Y DEL RESPONSABLE DEL ESTUDIO DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL. ................................................................................................................................... 1 I.1. PROYECTO:....................................................................................................................................................... 2 I.1.1. NOMBRE DEL PROYECTO..................................................................................................................... 2 I.1.2. UBICACIÓN DEL PROYECTO................................................................................................................ 3 I.1.3. TIEMPO DE VIDA ÚTIL DEL PROYECTO............................................................................................ 3 I.1.4. PRESENTACIÓN DE LA DOCUMENTACIÓN LEGAL: ....................................................................... 3 I.2. PROMOVENTE .................................................................................................................................................. 3 I.2.1. NOMBRE O RAZÓN SOCIAL.................................................................................................................. 3 I.2.2. REGISTRO FEDERAL DE CONTRIBUYENTES DEL PROMOVENTE............................................... 3 I.2.3. NOMBRE Y CARGO DEL REPRESENTANTE LEGAL ........................................................................ 3 I.2.4. DIRECCIÓN DEL PROMOVENTE O DE SU REPRESENTANTE LEGAL PARA RECIBIR U OÍR NOTIFICACIONES:............................................................................................................................................ 3 I.3. RESPONSABLE DE LA ELABORACIÓN DEL ESTUDIO DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL.................................. 3 I.3.1. NOMBRE O RAZÓN SOCIAL.................................................................................................................. 3 I.3.2. REGISTRO FEDERAL DE CONTRIBUYENTES O CURP .................................................................... 3 I.3.3. NOMBRE DEL RESPONSABLE TÉCNICO DEL ESTUDIO ................................................................. 4 I.3.4. DIRECCIÓN DEL RESPONSABLE TÉCNICO DEL ESTUDIO............................................................. 4 II. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LAS OBRAS O ACTIVIDADES........................................................................................ 5 II. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LAS OBRAS O ACTIVIDADES........................................................................................ 6 II.1. GENERALIDADES DEL PROYECTO .............................................................................................................. 6 II.1.1. NATURALEZA DEL PROYECTO.......................................................................................................... 6 II.1.2. JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS ............................................................................................................ 7 II.1.3. SELECCIÓN DEL SITIO.......................................................................................................................... 9 II.1.4. UBICACIÓN DEL PROYECTO............................................................................................................. 10 II.1.5. SITIOS ALTERNATIVOS...................................................................................................................... 11 II.1.6. INVERSIÓN REQUERIDA.................................................................................................................... 11 II.1.7. USO ACTUAL DEL SUELO Y/O CUERPOS DE AGUA EN EL SITIO DEL PROYECTO Y COLINDANCIAS .............................................................................................................................................. 11 II.1.7.1. ÁREA NATURAL PROTEGIDA ................................................................................................... 12 II.1.8. DIMENSIONES DEL PROYECTO........................................................................................................ 13 II.1.9. URBANIZACIÓN DEL ÁREA............................................................................................................... 14 II.1.10. DESCRIPCIÓN DE SERVICIOS REQUERIDOS ............................................................................... 14 II.2. CARACTERÍSTICAS PARTICULARES DEL PROYECTO ............................................................................. 22 II.2.1. PROGRAMA GENERAL DE TRABAJO .............................................................................................. 26 II.2.2. PREPARACIÓN DEL SITIO Y CONSTRUCCIÓN .............................................................................. 27 II.2.2.1. PREPARACIÓN DEL SITIO .......................................................................................................... 27 II.2.2.2. CONSTRUCCIÓN........................................................................................................................... 29 II.2.3. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LAS OBRAS Y ACTIVIDADES........................................................................... 32 II.2.4. DESCRIPCIÓN DE OBRAS Y ACTIVIDADES PROVISIONALES Y ASOCIADAS........................ 50 II.2.5. ABANDONO DEL SITIO....................................................................................................................... 52 II.2.6. TIEMPO DE VIDA ÚTIL DEL PROYECTO......................................................................................... 52 II.2.7. GENERACIÓN, MANEJO Y DISPOSICIÓN FINAL DE RESIDUOS SÓLIDOS, LÍQUIDOS Y EMISIONES A LA ATMÓSFERA.................................................................................................................... 52 II.2.7.1. GENERACIÓN, MANEJO Y DISPOSICIÓN FINAL DE RESIDUOS SÓLIDOS....................... 52 II.2.7.2. GENERACIÓN DE RESIDUOS SÓLIDOS ................................................................................... 52 II.2.8. GENERACIÓN Y EMISIÓN DE SUSTANCIAS A LA ATMÓSFERA ............................................... 56 II.2.8.1. CONTAMINACIÓN POR RUIDO Y VIBRACIONES.................................................................. 56 I Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Particular Parque Ecológico “Biosfera Maya Imperial” II.2.9. INFRAESTRUCTURA PARA EL MANEJO Y LA DISPOSICIÓN ADECUADA DE LOS RESIDUOS. ....................................................................................................................................................... 57 II.2.9.1. GENERACIÓN, MANEJO Y DESCARGA DE AGUAS RESIDUALES Y LODOS. .................. 57 II.2.10. MEDIDAS DE SEGURIDAD............................................................................................................... 58 II.2.11. SEÑALIZACIÓN (GRAFISMO) Y MEDIDAS PREVENTIVAS....................................................... 58 II.2.12. POSIBLES ACCIDENTES AMBIENTALES ...................................................................................... 58 III. VINCULACIÓN CON LOS INSTRUMENTOS DE PLANEACIÓN Y ORDENAMIENTOS JURÍDICOS APLICABLES............................................................................................................................................................ 60 III.1. INFORMACIÓN SECTORIAL ....................................................................................................................... 61 III.2. VINCULACIÓN CON LAS POLÍTICAS E INSTRUMENTOS DE PLANEACIÓN DEL DESARROLLO EN LA REGIÓN ............................................................................................................................................................ 61 III.2.1. PROGRAMAS DE ORDENAMIENTO ECOLÓGICO DEL TERRITORIO (POET) DECRETADOS. ............................................................................................................................................................................ 61 III.2.2. PLANES Y PROGRAMAS DE DESARROLLO URBANO ESTATALES Y MUNICIPALES ......... 61 III.2.2.1. PLANES SECTORIALES.............................................................................................................. 62 III.3. ANÁLISIS DE LOS ORDENAMIENTOS LEGALES APLICABLES............................................................... 62 III.3.1. LEYES Y REGLAMENTOS ................................................................................................................. 62 III.3.2. NORMAS OFICIALES MEXICANAS ................................................................................................. 62 III.3.2.1. DECRETOS Y PROGRAMAS DE MANEJO DE ÁREAS NATURALES PROTEGIDAS. ...... 63 III.3.2.2. CONVENIOS Y ACUERDOS INTERNACIONALES................................................................. 63 III.3.2.3. DECRETOS DE VEDA ................................................................................................................. 64 III.4. PROGRAMAS DE ORDENAMIENTO ECOLÓGICO DEL TERRITORIO (POET) DECRETADOS............ 64 III.5. PLANES Y PROGRAMAS DE DESARROLLO URBANO ESTATALES Y MUNICIPALES........................... 64 III.5.1. PLANES SECTORIALES ..................................................................................................................... 65 III.6. ANÁLISIS DE LOS ORDENAMIENTOS LEGALES APLICABLES............................................................... 67 III.6.1. LEYES Y REGLAMENTOS ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title First Japanese Record of the Mindoro Snake Eel Lamnostoma
    First Japanese record of the Mindoro snake eel Lamnostoma Title mindorum (Actinopterygii: Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) from the Ryukyu Islands Author(s) Oka, Shin-ichiro; Hanahara, Nozomi; Shintani, Tetsuya Citation Fauna Ryukyuana, 42: 5-8 Issue Date 2018-03-23 URL http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12000/39147 Rights Fauna Ryukyuana ISSN 2187-6657 http://w3.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/naruse/lab/Fauna_Ryukyuana.html First Japanese record of the Mindoro snake eel Lamnostoma mindorum (Actinopterygii: Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) from the Ryukyu Islands Shin-ichiro Oka1*, Nozomi Hanahara1, Tetsuya Shintani2 1Okinawa Churashima Foundation, 888 Ishikawa, Motobu-cho, Okinawa 905-0206, Japan 2Kawamura Gishi Co. Ltd., 1-12-1 Goryo, Daito-shi, Osaka 574-0064, Japan *Corresponding author (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. A single specimen (626 mm in total Japan, on June 24, 2017. This fish was kept in a 100 length) of Lamnostoma mindorum (Jordan & L freshwater tank and fed small living freshwater Richardson, 1908) was collected from the freshwater shrimps (1–2 cm length). The fish died due to an area in Okinawa Island, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. The unknown cause on October 31, 2017. There was no specimen represents the first record of L. mindorum apparent change in morphology during captivity. from Japan and the northernmost record of this After taking photographs and removing tissue for species. genetic analysis, the specimen was fixed in 10% formalin. Introduction Counts and measurements follow Hatooka & Yoshino (1998). Vertebral counts were based on CT The Mindoro snake eel Lamnostoma mindorum scanned images using a Somatom Definition AS CT (Jordan & Richardson, 1908) is a rare species of the scanner (Siemens Medical, Iselin, NJ, USA).
    [Show full text]
  • Conger Oceanicus
    Conger Eel − Conger oceanicus Overall Vulnerability Rank = High Biological Sensitivity = Moderate Climate Exposure = Very High Data Quality = 62% of scores ≥ 2 Expert Data Expert Scores Plots Conger oceanicus Scores Quality (Portion by Category) Low Moderate Stock Status 2.4 0.5 High Other Stressors 2.5 1.2 Very High Population Growth Rate 2.1 0.8 Spawning Cycle 2.9 2.4 Complexity in Reproduction 2.4 1.9 Early Life History Requirements 2.5 1.8 Sensitivity to Ocean Acidification 1.2 1.3 Prey Specialization 1.6 2.1 Habitat Specialization 2.4 3.0 Sensitivity attributes Sensitivity to Temperature 1.6 2.8 Adult Mobility 1.5 1.8 Dispersal & Early Life History 1.3 2.8 Sensitivity Score Moderate Sea Surface Temperature 4.0 3.0 Variability in Sea Surface Temperature 1.0 3.0 Salinity 2.4 3.0 Variability Salinity 1.2 3.0 Air Temperature 4.0 3.0 Variability Air Temperature 1.0 3.0 Precipitation 1.3 3.0 Variability in Precipitation 1.4 3.0 Ocean Acidification 4.0 2.0 Exposure variables Variability in Ocean Acidification 1.0 2.2 Currents 2.2 1.0 Sea Level Rise 2.4 1.5 Exposure Score Very High Overall Vulnerability Rank High Conger Eel (Anguilla oceanica) Overall Climate Vulnerability Rank: High (93% certainty from bootstrap analysis). Climate Exposure: Very High. Three exposure factors contributed to this score: Ocean Surface Temperature (4.0), Ocean Acidification (4.0) and Air Temperature (4.0). Conger Eel are semelparous: spawning in the ocean, developing in marine and estuarine habitats, then feeding growing, and maturing in marine and estuarine habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipanjan RAY 1, Anil MOHAPATRA 1*, Sudeepta BISWAS 2, Kamala K. SATPATHY 2, and Subhrendu S. MISHRA3
    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2015) 45 (1): 89–93 DOI: 10.3750/AIP2015.45.1.10 FIRST RECORD OF THE EVERMANN’S SNAKE EEL, OPHICHTHUS LITHINUS (ACTINOPTERYGII: ANGUILLIFORMES: OPHICHTHIDAE), FROM NORTHERN INDIAN OCEAN Dipanjan RAY 1, Anil MOHAPATRA 1* , Sudeepta BISWAS 2, Kamala K. SATPATHY 2, and Subhrendu S. MISHRA 3 1 Marine Aquarium and Regional Center, Zoological Survey of India, Digha, West Bengal, India 2 EnSD, RSEG, EIRSG, IGCAR, Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India 3 Marine Fish Section, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India Ray D., Mohapatra A., Biswas S., Satpathy K.K., Mishra S.S. 2015. First record of the Evermann’s snake eel, Ophichthus lithinus (Actinopterygii: Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae), from northern Indian Ocean. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 45 (1): 89–93 . Abstract. A little known species of snake eel, Ophichthus lithinus (Jordan et Richardson, 1908), is reported for the first time from the east coast of India, Bay of Bengal based on two specimens 632 and 720 mm in total length, collected respectively at Digha, West Bengal and Kalpakam, Tamil Nadu, India. This is the first attempt to pro - vide a detailed description of the species from the Indian Ocean. The presently reported findings constitute an extension of the known distributional range of this species from the Western Pacific to the eastern coast of India . Keywords: new record, fish, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, India, Bay of Bengal The fishes of the family Ophichthidae, commonly pling), nocturnal activity, and a specific habitat preference known as snake eels and worm eels, comprise 59 genera, of (Castle and McCosker 1999). which 45 are belonging to the subfamily Ophichthinae (tail The aim of this study was to describe the morpholog - tip hard, pointed and finless) (McCosker 1998, 1999, 2007) ical characteristics of a rare snake eel species—the and 14 to the subfamily Myrophinae (tail tip flexible and Evermann’s snake eel, Ophichthus lithinus (Jordan et confluent with dorsal and anal fins) (McCosker et al.
    [Show full text]
  • True Eels Or Freshwater Eels - Anguillidae
    ISSN 0859-290X, Vol. 5, No. 1 – September 1999 [Supplement No. 6] Even if the eels, in the perception of most people, constitute a readily recognizable group of elongated and snakelike fish, the eels do not constitute a taxonomic group. There is considerable confusion related to eels. See the following system used in "Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong" by Walther Rainboth (1996). In the Mekong, two orders (Anguilliformes and Synbranchiformes) including five eel-Iike fish families are represented: The true eels (Anguillidae), the worm eels (Ophichthidae), the dwarf swamp eels (Chaudhuriidae), the swamp eels (Synbranchidae), and the spiny eels (Mastacembelidae). Of these, the swamp eels and spiny eels are by far the most important in the fisheries. True eels or Freshwater eels - Anguillidae The name "freshwater eels", is not a good name to describe the habits of the species in this family. All the anguillid species are catadromous (a catadromous fish is bom in the sea, but lives most of its life in fresh water). The sexually mature fish migrate down to the sea to spawn, and the juveniles ("the elvers") move, sometimes for a considerable distance, up the river to find their nursery areas. The true eels, contrary to most of the other Mekong eels, have two gill openings, which are high on each side of the fish. The body is covered with small scales that are deeply embedded in the skin. Pelvic fins are absent, while pectoral fins are well developed. The long dorsal and anal fins are continuous with the caudal fin, and the fins are not preceded by any spines.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake Eels (Ophichthidae) of the Remote St. Peter and St. Paul's Archipelago (Equatorial Atlantic): Museum Records After 37 Ye
    Arquipelago - Life and Marine Sciences ISSN: 0873-4704 Snake eels (Ophichthidae) of the remote St. Peter and St. Paul’s Archipelago (Equatorial Atlantic): Museum records after 37 years of shelf life OSMAR J. LUIZ AND JOHN E. MCCOSKER Luiz, O.J. and J.E. McCosker 2018. Snake eels (Ophichthidae) of the remote St. Peter and St. Paul’s Archipelago (Equatorial Atlantic): Museum records after 37 years of shelf life. Arquipelago. Life and Marine Sciences 36: 9 - 13. Despite of its major zoogeographical interest, the biological diversity of central Atlantic oceanic islands are still poorly known because of its remoteness. Incomplete species inventories are a hindrance to macroecology and conservation because knowledge on species distribution are important for identifying patterns and processes in biodiversity and for conservation planning. Records of the snake-eel family Ophichthidae for the St. Peter and St. Paul’s Archipelago, Brazil, are presented for the first time after revision of material collected and deposited in a museum collection 37 yrs ago. Specimens of Apterichtus kendalli and Herpetoichthys regius were collected using rotenone on sand bottoms and one Myrichthys sp. was observed and photographed swimming over a rocky reef. Remarkably, these species were not seen or collected in the St. Peter and St. Paul’s Archipelago ever since despite the substantial increase of biological expeditions over the past two decades, suggesting that the unjustified rotenone sampling prohibition in Brazil is hindering advancement of the nation’s biological diversity knowledge. Key words: Central Atlantic islands, Anguilliformes, sampling bias, rotenone prohibition. Osmar J. Luiz (e-mail: [email protected]), Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0810 Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Branchial Muscles 10 Representatives of Five Eel Families!' 2 GARETH J
    Branchial Muscles 10 Representatives of Five Eel Families!' 2 GARETH J. N ELSON3 D URING THE EVOLUTION of eels the gill arch lated genera ( those listed in N elson, 1966 ) skeleton of some forms was profoundly modi­ suggested that the six genera selected for study fied in gross structure. The modifications are are representative of the families or subfamilies adaptive and are associated with body form and to which they belong. All material was ob­ feeding habits of eels (Nelson, 1966 ). The tained from the collections of the Dep artment present paper deals with the musculature at­ of Zoology, University of Hawaii . W ith the tached to the gill arch skeleton of eels repre­ exception of specimens of Anguilla, study senting five families, primarily of the suborder material originally was collected by means of Anguilloidei. Six genera were chosen for study: shallow water rotenone poisoning around Oahu Congel' (Congridae), Anguilla (Anguillidae), and Christmas Island. M oringtta (Moringuidae) , Kattpichthys (Xeno­ The illustrations show the muscles in ap­ congridae), Uropterygius, and Gymn othorax proximately their relative size and positions. (Muraenidae) . The gill arch skeleton of these Muscles attaching to structures other than gill forms shows a progressive reduction of ele­ arches are shown transected . Occasionally ments, showing probable stages in the evolu­ other muscles are shown with parts removed tionary development of the specialized "pha­ to reveal underlying structures . Roots of the ryngeal jaws" of the morays-eels of the branchial arteries are included in the illustra­ family Muraenidae. tions, for they serve as convenient landmarks, Gill arch musculature in eels has been studied separating adjacent muscles.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Identification of Marine Eels Through DNA Barcoding From
    Genomics Data 11 (2017) 81–84 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Genomics Data journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gdata Genetic identification of marine eels through DNA barcoding from Parangipettai coastal waters Samuel Peninal, Janakiraman Subramanian, Alaganatham Elavarasi, Murugaiyan Kalaiselvam ⁎ Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India article info abstract Article history: Anguilliformes, also known as “true eels”, are an ecologically diverse group of predominantly marine origin Received 24 September 2016 whose members were easily recognized by their extremely elongated bodies with reduced cross-sectional Received in revised form 4 December 2016 areas and universal lack of pelvic fins. The Marine Eels were collected from landing centres of Parangipettai coast- Accepted 7 December 2016 al waters and identified based on their morphometric and meristic characters. The newly recorded species were Available online 09 December 2016 used for the barcoding analysis. Information on molecular taxonomy of marine eels was very meagre and hence, Keywords: the present study was aimed to study the barcoding of marine eels which were present along the southeast coast fi Barcoding of India. The cube of lateral muscle was exercised for DNA isolation followed by its ampli cation. Cluster IX 2.06 COXI was used to align the nucleotide sequences (Thomson, 1997). The evolutionary history was inferred using the Marine eels Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maxi- Nucleotide analysis mum Composite Likelihood method (Tamura et al., 2004). The barcodes sequences were submitted in NCBI (Na- Anguillidae tional centre for Biotechnological Information).
    [Show full text]
  • Anguilla Bengalensis): a Threatened Ichthyofauna of Assam, India Shamim Rahman1*, Ellora Barua2, Jitendra K Choudhury3, Amalesh Du A4 and Mohan C Kalita1
    International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology Citation: IJAEB: 8(3): 511-519 September 2015 DOI Number: 10.5958/2230-732X.2015.00058.3 ©2015 New Delhi Publishers. All rights reserved GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING Generation of DNA barcodes in Indian mottled EEL (Anguilla Bengalensis): A threatened ichthyofauna of Assam, India Shamim Rahman1*, Ellora Barua2, Jitendra K Choudhury3, Amalesh Du a4 and Mohan C Kalita1 1Department of Biotechnology, Gauha University, Guwaha 781014, Assam, India. 2,3Department of Zoology, North Gauha College, Guwaha 781031, Assam, India. 4Department of Zoology, Gauha University, Guwaha 781014, Assam, India. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Paper No. 342 Received: 8 August 2014 Accepted: 21 August 2015 Abstract Eels have always been a source of fascination because of their charismatic shape and size. They are good source of animal protein and bear high food values. Dwindling population of eels has meanwhile led certain species to IUCN threatened categories. In spite of these, scientifi c investigations on the only species of this genus, Anguilla bengalensis, in this region have not been reported much. Many biological questions of the catadromous fi sh are still unanswered. Quick but authentic identifi cation of threatened species is vital to unveil such query and frame out conservation and management strategies. DNA barcodes utilising partial mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene and nuclear rhodopsin gene were developed in this current study. Conventional taxonomic information has also been included contemplating inevitable role of it in unambiguous species level discrimination. The study has generated novel barcode of the species from this region to decipher implications on congeneric and conspecifi c divergence.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Deepwater Worm-Eel, Muraenichthys Profundorum (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae), from the Nazca Ridge
    Japan. J. Ichthyol. 魚 類 学 雑 誌 42 (3/4): 231-235, 1995 42 (3/4): 231- 235, 1 9 95 A New Species of Deepwater Worm-eel, Muraenichthys profundorum (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae), from the Nazca Ridge John E. McCosker1and N.V. Parin2 CaliforniaAcademy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 1 94118-4599, USA 2 P.P. ShirshovInstitute of Oceanology,Moscow 117218, Russia (ReceivedJanuary 9, 1995; in revisedform August 12, 1995; accepted August 15, 1995) AbstractA newspecies of deepwatereastern Pacific worm-eel, Muraenichthys profundorum, subgen Scolecenchelys,is described from a specimentrawled at 310mon theNazca Ridge. It is the deepe captureof any known Muraenichthys. The new species is distinguishedfrom its closest relatives in havin morevertebrae and slightly different body and head morphometry. The distribution of easternPacif Muraenichthysis the result of eastwarddispersal along the southeastern margin of theIndo-west Pacif Plate. Taxonomicactions concerning the species of Muraenichthys are reviewe Worm-eels of the genus Muraenichthys (family Bleeker; M devisi Fowler, M ogilbyi Fowler, and Ophichthidae, subfamily Myrophinae) are the most Aotea acus Phillips were placed in the synonymy of speciose of tropical Indo-Pacific myrophines and M. macropterus; the assumed synonymies of Echidna often the most common eel found in shallow water uniformis Seale and M owstoni Jordan and Snyder sand environments. There are approximately 23 with M. macropterus were confirmed; and M. cookei currently recognized species known from the tropi- Fowler was recognized to be distinct from M. cal, subtropical, and warm-temperate Indo-Pacific laticaudata (Ogilby). Bauchot and Mauge(1980) Ocean, and to that list we herein add the second described M.
    [Show full text]
  • Nembe-English Dictionary
    NEMBE-ENGLISH DICTIONARY 2nd edition of the Nembe dictionary, M.H.I. Kaliai, University of Ibadan Press, 1964. This version prepared and edited by Roger Blench Roger Blench Mallam Dendo 8, Guest Road Cambridge CB1 2AL United Kingdom Voice/ Fax. 0044-(0)1223-560687 Mobile worldwide (00-44)-(0)7967-696804 E-mail [email protected] http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm To whom all correspondence should be addressed. This printout: August 6, 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations: ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Editor’s Preface............................................................................................................................................... 3 i Abbreviations: Parts of speech of headwords have been indicated in this edition as follows adj. adjective aux. v. auxiliary verb cf. compare coll. colloquial conj. conjunction dem. demonstrative E. English enc. enclitic esp. especially ext. suff. extensional suffix H. Hausa infl. suff. inflectional suffix int. interjection int. interrogative lit. literally n. noun num. numeral p.n. proper name prep. preposition pron. pronoun poss. possessive pronoun quant. quantifier v. verb Y. Yoruba derived from ii Nembe dictionary. Kaliai revised Blench. Circulation draft 6-Aug-08 Editor’s Preface The present Nembe dictionary is a revised and expanded version of the Nembe dictionary published by M.H.I. Kaliai at the University of Ibadan in 1964. died in early January 2005, with it still unpublished. During the 1990s, the manuscript was typed without alteration into an Apple-based system under the auspices of the late Professor Kay Williamson. The files transferred to an IBM system in the early 2000s, but without any conversion of the character codes. This was only partly successful, and several sections of the dictionary became corrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Ketibunder Ecological2008.Pdf
    Disclaimer note This information should be considered accurate as of the date prepared, namely 2007. You acknowledge that this information may change over time and you should not assume that this information is accurate at a later date. WWF-Pakistan and the Royal Netherlands Embassy accept no responsibility for any errors, deviations and omissions in information compiled by independent consultants in this report. Please send comments regarding any errors, inconsistencies, unacknowledged use of source material or any other issue regarding this ecological baseline report as it will help to curate this database. Comments can be submitted to [email protected] Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keti Bunder Table of contents i List of tables vi List of figures viii List of maps and images x List of Acronyms xi List of resource people/consultants xiii Acknowledgement xiv Executive summary xv Chapter 1 Introduction…………………..………………………………… 1 1.1 Introduction to Keti Bunder….……………………………… 2 1.1.1 State of natural resources…………………………………….. 4 1.1.2 Livelihood and social aspects…………………………………. 5 1.2 Rationale and Objectives…………………………………… 6 1.2.1 Large Mammals Survey……………………………………….. 6 1.2.1.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 6 1.2.1.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………… 7 1.2.2 Small mammal survey…………………………………………. 7 1.2.2.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 7 1.2.2.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………... 9 1.2.3 Reptiles and amphibians survey……………………………… 10 1.2.3.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 10 1.2.3.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………... 10 1.2.4 Birds survey…………………………………………………….. 11 1.2.4.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 11 1.2.4.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………… 11 1.2.5 Marine Fisheries…………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalic Morphology of Ariosoma Gilberti (Bathymyrinae: Congridae)
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2014), 1(1): 39–50 Received: January 01, 2014 © 2014 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: March 01, 2014 E-ISSN: 2383-0964 ; P-ISSN: 2383-1561 doi: doi: Cephalic Morphology of Ariosoma gilberti (Bathymyrinae: Congridae) Soheil EAGDERI1*, Dominique ADRIAENS2 1Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, Karaj Campus, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. 2Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates Laboratory, Department of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Email: [email protected] Abstract: The head bones and relevant muscles are important elements composing the feeding and respiration apparatus and can be considered as highly important structures for giving rise to evolutionary specializations. The eels of the Anguilloidei is a diverse group and structural diversity in their cranial musculoskeletal system is thus to be expected. Ariosoma gilberti is a member of Bathymyrinae (Congridae) with a hydraulic based prey transport and closely related to muraenid family with mechanical prey transport system. Since there is no information about the cephalic morphology of A. gilbert, hence this study was conducted to provide detailed description of its cranial osteology and myology. The immobile maxillary with large pointed teeth, an anterior moderate mouth gape, large jaw closing muscles and large lateral and ventral bony elements, providing more room for the orobranchial cavity of A. gilberti suggesting the presence of a hydraulic and suction-based mechanism. Keywords: Anguilliform, Osteology, Myology, Cranial morphology, Adaptation. Introduction each year (Smith & Kanazawa 1977; Castle & The head musculoskeletal system and its integration McCosker 1999; Chen & Mok 2001; Smith and in the functioning of the skull can be considered as a Karmovskaya 2003; Smith 2004), and more are highly important pattern for giving rise to expected to be recognized as various habitats are evolutionary specializations by means of natural examined more closely, especially those of the deep selection.
    [Show full text]