Louis Leakey and Mary Leakey the First Family of Palaeoanthropology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Louis Leakey and Mary Leakey the First Family of Palaeoanthropology GENERAL ¨ ARTICLE Louis Leakey and Mary Leakey The First Family of Palaeoanthropology Rajan Gaur Louis and Mary Leakey are two famous palaeoanthropologists and archaeologists of the twentieth century whose discoveries have had a major influence on our understanding of human evolution. These discoveries were spectacular and brought popular attention to the field of palaeoanthropology, though at times they also courted controversies. Though, debate on the proper interpretation of many of the fossil hominid finds Rajan Gaur is a Professor made by them continues even today, no one questions their at the Department of tremendous contribution to our knowledge about evolution of Anthropology, Panjab humankind. This article is focussed on their life and works. University,Chandigarh. His major area of research has been Introduction palaeoanthropology, mammalian palaeontology, Ever since Darwin published his monumental work in his book palaeoecology and physical ‘On the Origin of Species’ in 1859, the idea of evolution has anthropology. Over the gradually caught the imagination of the scientific community. last thirtyyears he has led However, it took a while for the concept of human evolution to be several palaeoanthropological accepted, in the face of the millennia-old and deeply entrenched fieldworks in the Siwaliks biblical view of the universe as a static representation of God’s of Northwest India and the creative device. Before Darwin’s theory, most scholars believed Narmada Basin and the explanation of Archbishop James Ussher of Armagh, Ireland collected a number of vertebrate fossils. and John Lightfoot (Vice Chancellor of the University of Cam- bridge), who in the early 1600s had deduced from a careful study of the Bible that earth had been created at 9 o’clock on October 23, 4004 BC. By the middle of the nineteenth century, fossilized remains of human ancestors had begun to be unearthed from various localities in Europe. One of the earliest was perhaps some cranial and limb bones Keywords recovered in 1856 from the limestone cave in ‘Neander Valley’ Palaeoanthropology, human evolution, Louis Leakey, Mary near Düsseldorf, Germany, which, a few years later, were re- Leakey, Africa, Olduvai gorge, ferred to as the ‘Neanderthal Man’ (or, Homo neanderthalensis, fossil hominids. RESONANCE ¨ August 2015 667 GENERAL ¨ ARTICLE It was the efforts of a name first used by an English geologist William King in 1864 ). Louis and Mary For a major part of the 19th century, most discoveries of human Leakey, the patriarchs fossils were reported from Europe. It was in 1892 that Eugene of the first palaeo- Dubois, a Dutch doctor working in the army in Dutch East Indies anthropologyfamily, (now Indonesia), reported the first hominid from outside Europe whichconclusively and named it Anthropopithecus erectus, popularly known as the brought into spotlight ‘Java Man’ (subsequently named as Pithecanthropus erectus and the significance of finally as Homo erectus). Africa as the cradle of In the 1920s, several hominid finds were reported from humankind. Zhoukoudian in China (named as Sinanthropus by Davidson Black in 1927 and now known as Homo erectus). Thus, for some time (even beyond the first quarter of the twentieth century), after the discoveries from Java and Zhoukoudian in China, it was believed that humans had had Asian origins and Asia was the cradle of human evolution. The discovery of the fossil skull of a baby from a lime quarry at Taung in the Northern Cape, South Africa by Raymond Dart in 1924 was a significant palaeoanthropological event. This find was published as Australopithecus africanus in 1925 in Nature as the first evidence of an early fossil link between the apes and humans and Dart boldly proposed Africa as the cradle of humanity, a claim that was largely dismissed by scholars at the time. This find was dismissed as a relative of either a chimpanzee or a gorilla with little bearing on human ancestry, more so, because the specimen was of a child and for the authorities of the time, the matter was not even worth discussing until an adult specimen was discovered [1]. In the middle and late 1930’s, fossil remains of adult hominid ancestors were discovered by Robert Broom from South African cave deposits (Australopithecus transvaalensis from Sterkfontein in 1936 and Paranthropus robustus from Kromedraii in 1938), which lent support to Dart’s contention. However, it was the efforts of Louis and Mary Leakey, the patriarchs of the first palaeoanthropology family, which conclusively brought into spot- light the significance of Africa as the cradle of humankind. Figure 1 shows the timeline of the evolution of the genus Homo. 668 RESONANCE ¨August 2015 GENERAL ¨ ARTICLE Figure 1. Evolutionary time- line of the hominids. With this background, the readers will be able to better appreciate the life and works of Louis and Mary Leakey, two of the pioneers of palaeoanthropology and archaeology of Africa, which are being presented here. Louis and his wife Mary Leakey are known worldwide for their several landmark discoveries in Africa con- nected with early human evolution. Their discoveries helped to shift the opinion of the scientific community to the notion that the earlier phases of human evolution happened in Africa. Louis Leakey Louis Seymour Bazett Leakey was the patriarch of a family that stands out due to its profound contributions to the field of palaeoanthropology and archaeology in particular; a family that has dominated the field of anthropology as no other before. The members of the Leakey family have made crucial discoveries Besides which have fashioned our understanding of human origins and palaeoanthropology, evolution. It would not be an exaggeration to state that very few Louis made significant people have had more influence on human origin studies than the contributions to passionate, enthusiastic, brilliant and sometimes unconventional palaeontology, and controversial Louis Leakey. Besides palaeoanthropology, he primatology and made significant contributions to palaeontology, primatology and archaeology of Africa. archaeology of Africa. RESONANCE ¨ August 2015 669 GENERAL ¨ ARTICLE Louis was more Early Years interested in studying Louis Leakey was born at Kabete, near Nairobi, Kenya on August birds and while searching for birds in 7, 1903. His British parents, Harry Leakey and Mary Leakey, were missionaries sent to live among the Kikuyu, the largest tribe theKenyanbushhe stumbled upon stone of Kenya. As a child, Louis lived among the Kikuyu and learned their language and culture. He grew up in conditions which most artefacts in river beds at the age of 13 years. people would consider as rough and his first home just had a thatched roof. These early tough experiences probably helped him face the harsh work environments at fossil localities. All through his life, he remained a supporter for the cause of the Kikuyu. In his childhood, Louis was more interested in studying birds and while searching for birds in the Kenyan bush he stumbled upon stone artefacts in river beds at the age of 13 years. These initial finds were to shape his lifetime interest in human origins. Education and Family Life In 1922, Louis went to study in England at St John’s College, Cambridge University. There he was not very popular for several reasons: his peculiar accent that was tinted with the Kikuyu rhythm, his unique gait, his shyness and his strange stories of life in Kenya [2]. He was forced to postpone his studies on account of aheadinjurysufferedduringarugbymatch,whichdoctors diagnosed as post-traumatic epilepsy [2]. With no cure known at the time, he was advised prolonged rest away from Cambridge. In a way, the injury was to shape his destiny that would lead him to become a legendary figure in palaeoanthropology. While recov- ering from the injury, he left England to take up the management of a palaeontological expedition sponsored by the British Mu- seum of Natural History in what is now Tanzania. He later returned to England in 1925 to resume his education and gradu- ated from Cambridge University in 1926 with degrees in archae- ology and anthropology. Soon after graduating, Louis set out for his first archaeological expedition in East Africa. It is interesting to note that a year 670 RESONANCE ¨August 2015 GENERAL ¨ ARTICLE before, Raymond Dart had reported the discovery of first hominid fossil (Australopithecus africanus, also popularly knownas Taung Child) from the African continent. Louis’s main aim was to find the earliest fossils of Homo, a genus to which we belong. Contrary to prevailing beliefs of the day that humanity originated in Asia, Louis was of the firm belief that man had arisen in Africa – a notion originally put forward by Charles Darwin. However, for the subsequent nearly two decades, his expeditions could recover mainly stone tools and no early hominid fossil was found. His works, nevertheless, attracted admiration and he was awarded a doctorate degree in 1930. Meanwhile, in 1928, Louis Leakey married an English lady, Farida Avern, whom he had met in Africa, and the couple had two children. This marriage did not last long and when Farida Avern was pregnant with her second child, Leakey left her and married Mary Nicols in 1936 [3]. Louis had met a very young Mary Nicols in England in 1933. She had been introduced to Louis by Canton– Thompson at the Royal Anthropological Institute. Impressed by her talents, Louis invited her to illustrate for his book Adam’s Ancestors (first edition, 1934, Box 1). Mary was shy and intelli- gent while Louis was charming, gregarious and very charismatic. Mary was a distant relative of John Frere, who had done pioneer- ing work on the stone tool culture of Europe and she had had a very unconventional education before becoming a promising archaeologist. She became his field assistant [4]. They soon struck a chord and the ensuing affair culminated in marriage. This launched the beginning of what would prove to be Contrary to prevailing a mutually beneficial and scientifically a very rewarding relation- beliefs of the day that ship.
Recommended publications
  • Geologists Probe Hominid Environments
    1999 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Geologists Probe Hominid Environments Gail M. Ashley, Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT challenging areas of research often lie at artificially imposed disci- pline boundaries. Here lies the potential for synergy and perhaps The study of an early Pleistocene “time slice” in Olduvai even the generation of a new science (Fig. 2). However, integrat- Gorge, Tanzania, provides a successful example of a recon- ing sciences is not as easy as it might first appear. It requires peo- structed paleolandscape that is rich in detail and adds a small ple to learn language, theories, methodologies, and a bit about piece to the puzzle of hominid evolution in Africa. The recon- the “culture” of the other science and to continually walk in the struction required multidisciplinary interaction of sedimen- other person’s shoes. Simply having lots of scientists with differ- tologists, paleoanthropologists, paleoecologists, and geochro- ent backgrounds working in parallel on the same project doesn’t nologists. Geology plays an increasingly important role in produce the same end result as integrative science. unraveling the record of hominid evolution. Key questions This paper describes a study at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania (Fig. regarding paleoclimate, paleoenvironment, and perhaps even 3), using a relatively new approach, landscape paleoanthropol- hominid land use are answered by geology, and these answers ogy, that attempts to interpret the landscape during a geologic provide a basis for multidisciplinary work. Landscape pale- instant in time. The project is the Olduvai Landscape Paleo- oanthropology integrates these data from several disciplines anthropology Project (OLAPP), involving a multidisciplinary to interpret the ecological context of hominids during a nar- team.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracker June/July 2014
    KENYA MUSEUM SOCIETY Tracker June/July 2014 Joy Adamson Exhibition Photo by Ebrahim Mwangi, NMK AV Dept Kenya Museum Society P.O. Box 40658 - 00100 Nairobi, Kenya [email protected] www.kenyamuseumsociety.org Tel: 3743808/2339158 (Direct) kenyamuseumsociety Tel: 8164134/5/6 ext 2311 Cell: 0724255299 @museumsociety DRY ASSOCIATES LTD Investment Group Offering you a rainbow of opportunities ... Wealth Management Since 1994 Dry Associates House Brookside Grove, Westlands, Nairobi Tel: +254 (20) 445-0520/1 +254 (20) 234-9651 Mobile(s): 0705799971/0705849429/ 0738253811 June/July 2014 Tracker www.dryassociates.com2 NEWS FROM NMK Joy Adamson Exhibition New at Nairobi National Museum he historic collections of Joy Adamson’s portraits of the peoples of Kenya as well as her botanical and wildlife paintings are once again on view at the TNairobi National Museum. This exhibi- tion includes 50 of Joy’s intriguing portraits and her beautiful botanicals and wildlifeThe exhibition,illustrations funded that are by complementedKMS was officially by related opened objects on May from 19. the muse- um’sVisit ethnographic the KMS shop and where scientific cards collections. featuring some of the portraits are available as is the book, Peoples of Kenya; KMS members are entitled to a 5 per cent dis- count on books. The museum is open seven days a week from 9.30 am to 5.30 pm. Joy Adamson Exhibition Photo by Ebrahim Mwangi, NMK AV Dept June/July 2014 Tracker 3 KMS EASTER SAFARI 18Tsavo - 21 APRIL West 2014 National Park By James Reynolds he Kenya Museum Society's Easter trip saw organiser Narinder Heyer Ta simple but tasty snack in Makindu's Sikh temple, the group entered lead a group of 21 people in 7 vehicles to Tsavo West National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Habilis
    COMMENT SUSTAINABILITY Citizens and POLICY End the bureaucracy THEATRE Shakespeare’s ENVIRONMENT James Lovelock businesses must track that is holding back science world was steeped in on surprisingly optimistic governments’ progress p.33 in India p.36 practical discovery p.39 form p.41 The foot of the apeman that palaeo­ ‘handy man’, anthropologists had been Homo habilis. recovering in southern Africa since the 1920s. This, the thinking went, was replaced by the taller, larger-brained Homo erectus from Asia, which spread to Europe and evolved into Nean­ derthals, which evolved into Homo sapiens. But what lay between the australopiths and H. erectus, the first known human? BETTING ON AFRICA Until the 1960s, H. erectus had been found only in Asia. But when primitive stone-chop­ LIBRARY PICTURE EVANS MUSEUM/MARY HISTORY NATURAL ping tools were uncovered at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, Leakey became convinced that this is where he would find the earliest stone- tool makers, who he assumed would belong to our genus. Maybe, like the australopiths, our human ancestors also originated in Africa. In 1931, Leakey began intensive prospect­ ing and excavation at Olduvai Gorge, 33 years before he announced the new human species. Now tourists travel to Olduvai on paved roads in air-conditioned buses; in the 1930s in the rainy season, the journey from Nairobi could take weeks. The ravines at Olduvai offered unparalleled access to ancient strata, but field­ work was no picnic in the park. Water was often scarce. Leakey and his team had to learn to share Olduvai with all of the wild animals that lived there, lions included.
    [Show full text]
  • Hands-On Human Evolution: a Laboratory Based Approach
    Hands-on Human Evolution: A Laboratory Based Approach Developed by Margarita Hernandez Center for Precollegiate Education and Training Author: Margarita Hernandez Curriculum Team: Julie Bokor, Sven Engling A huge thank you to….. Contents: 4. Author’s note 5. Introduction 6. Tips about the curriculum 8. Lesson Summaries 9. Lesson Sequencing Guide 10. Vocabulary 11. Next Generation Sunshine State Standards- Science 12. Background information 13. Lessons 122. Resources 123. Content Assessment 129. Content Area Expert Evaluation 131. Teacher Feedback Form 134. Student Feedback Form Lesson 1: Hominid Evolution Lab 19. Lesson 1 . Student Lab Pages . Student Lab Key . Human Evolution Phylogeny . Lab Station Numbers . Skeletal Pictures Lesson 2: Chromosomal Comparison Lab 48. Lesson 2 . Student Activity Pages . Student Lab Key Lesson 3: Naledi Jigsaw 77. Lesson 3 Author’s note Introduction Page The validity and importance of the theory of biological evolution runs strong throughout the topic of biology. Evolution serves as a foundation to many biological concepts by tying together the different tenants of biology, like ecology, anatomy, genetics, zoology, and taxonomy. It is for this reason that evolution plays a prominent role in the state and national standards and deserves thorough coverage in a classroom. A prime example of evolution can be seen in our own ancestral history, and this unit provides students with an excellent opportunity to consider the multiple lines of evidence that support hominid evolution. By allowing students the chance to uncover the supporting evidence for evolution themselves, they discover the ways the theory of evolution is supported by multiple sources. It is our hope that the opportunity to handle our ancestors’ bone casts and examine real molecular data, in an inquiry based environment, will pique the interest of students, ultimately leading them to conclude that the evidence they have gathered thoroughly supports the theory of evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Unravelling the Positional Behaviour of Fossil Hominoids: Morphofunctional and Structural Analysis of the Primate Hindlimb
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Doctorado en Biodiversitat Facultad de Ciènces Tesis doctoral Unravelling the positional behaviour of fossil hominoids: Morphofunctional and structural analysis of the primate hindlimb Marta Pina Miguel 2016 Memoria presentada por Marta Pina Miguel para optar al grado de Doctor por la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, programa de doctorado en Biodiversitat del Departamento de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia (Facultad de Ciències). Este trabajo ha sido dirigido por el Dr. Salvador Moyà Solà (Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont) y el Dr. Sergio Almécija Martínez (The George Washington Univertisy). Director Co-director Dr. Salvador Moyà Solà Dr. Sergio Almécija Martínez A mis padres y hermana. Y a todas aquelas personas que un día decidieron perseguir un sueño Contents Acknowledgments [in Spanish] 13 Abstract 19 Resumen 21 Section I. Introduction 23 Hominoid positional behaviour The great apes of the Vallès-Penedès Basin: State-of-the-art Section II. Objectives 55 Section III. Material and Methods 59 Hindlimb fossil remains of the Vallès-Penedès hominoids Comparative sample Area of study: The Vallès-Penedès Basin Methodology: Generalities and principles Section IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Ch1 Nile Perch and HIV Among the Suba of Lake Victoria
    Towards an Anthropology of Organic Health 1 Salmen, Charles 2009. "Towards an Anthropology of Organic Health: The Relational Fields of HIV/AIDS among the Suba of Lake Victoria". Distinguished Masters Dissertation, Oxford Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Chapter 1 Introduction: The smallest AIDS virus takes you from sex to the unconscious, then to Africa, tissue cultures, DNA and San Francisco, but the analysts, thinkers, journalists and decision-makers will slice the delicate network traced by the virus for you into tidy compartments where you will find only science, only economy, only social phenomena, only local news, only sentiment, only sex….To shuttle back and forth, we rely on the notion of translation, or network. More supple than the notion of system, more historical than the notion of structure, more empirical than the notion of complexity, the idea of network is the Ariadne’s thread of these interwoven stories. -Bruno Latour,, from We Have Never Been Modern. ♣ In the decades since the inception of our discipline, medical anthropology has contributed a diverse corpus of ethnographic research blurring the lines between the biological, social, and ecological factors that shape wellbeing and sickness. Yet, within the biomedical institutions that direct global health today, disease and health continue to be understood primarily in physiological terms. Numerous compelling arguments for biocultural synthesis continue to fall on deaf ears due in large part, I assert, to the axiomatic notion in biomedicine that an individual human being represents a discrete organism. An emerging consortium of anthropologists, systems biologists, and human ecologists, however, suggest that the distinction between human organism and human ecosystem is inherently ambiguous.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Members of the Genus Homo -. EXPLORATIONS: an OPEN INVITATION to BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
    EXPLORATIONS: AN OPEN INVITATION TO BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Editors: Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera and Lara Braff American Anthropological Association Arlington, VA 2019 Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. ISBN – 978-1-931303-63-7 www.explorations.americananthro.org 10. Early Members of the Genus Homo Bonnie Yoshida-Levine Ph.D., Grossmont College Learning Objectives • Describe how early Pleistocene climate change influenced the evolution of the genus Homo. • Identify the characteristics that define the genus Homo. • Describe the skeletal anatomy of Homo habilis and Homo erectus based on the fossil evidence. • Assess opposing points of view about how early Homo should be classified. Describe what is known about the adaptive strategies of early members of the Homo genus, including tool technologies, diet, migration patterns, and other behavioral trends.The boy was no older than 9 when he perished by the swampy shores of the lake. After death, his slender, long-limbed body sank into the mud of the lake shallows. His bones fossilized and lay undisturbed for 1.5 million years. In the 1980s, fossil hunter Kimoya Kimeu, working on the western shore of Lake Turkana, Kenya, glimpsed a dark colored piece of bone eroding in a hillside. This small skull fragment led to the discovery of what is arguably the world’s most complete early hominin fossil—a youth identified as a member of the species Homo erectus. Now known as Nariokotome Boy, after the nearby lake village, the skeleton has provided a wealth of information about the early evolution of our own genus, Homo (see Figure 10.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Goodall: a Timeline 3
    Discussion Guide Table of Contents The Life of Jane Goodall: A Timeline 3 Growing Up: Jane Goodall’s Mission Starts Early 5 Louis Leakey and the ‘Trimates’ 7 Getting Started at Gombe 9 The Gombe Community 10 A Family of Her Own 12 A Lifelong Mission 14 Women in the Biological Sciences Today 17 Jane Goodall, in Her Own Words 18 Additional Resources for Further Study 19 © 2017 NGC Network US, LLC and NGC Network International, LLC. All rights reserved. 2 Journeys in Film : JANE The Life of Jane Goodall: A Timeline April 3, 1934 Valerie Jane Morris-Goodall is born in London, England. 1952 Jane graduates from secondary school, attends secretarial school, and gets a job at Oxford University. 1957 At the invitation of a school friend, Jane sails to Kenya, meets Dr. Louis Leakey, and takes a job as his secretary. 1960 Jane begins her observations of the chimpanzees at what was then Gombe Stream Game Reserve, taking careful notes. Her mother is her companion from July to November. 1961 The chimpanzee Jane has named David Greybeard accepts her, leading to her acceptance by the other chimpanzees. 1962 Jane goes to Cambridge University to pursue a doctorate, despite not having any undergraduate college degree. After the first term, she returns to Africa to continue her study of the chimpanzees. She continues to travel back and forth between Cambridge and Gombe for several years. Baron Hugo van Lawick, a photographer for National Geographic, begins taking photos and films at Gombe. 1964 Jane and Hugo marry in England and return to Gombe.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, pages 35-21 3 Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection Ceri Shipton Access 3.1 Introduction Louis Seymour Bazett Leakey is considered to be the founding father of palaeoanthropology, and his donation of some 6,747 artefacts from several Kenyan sites to the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) make his one of the largest collections in the Museum. Leakey was passionate aboutopen human evolution and Africa, and was able to prove that the deep roots of human ancestry lay in his native east Africa. At Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania he excavated an extraordinary sequence of Pleistocene human evolution, discovering several hominin species and naming the earliest known human culture: the Oldowan. At Olorgesailie, Kenya, he excavated an Acheulean site that is still influential in our understanding of Lower Pleistocene human behaviour. On Rusinga Island in Lake Victoria, Kenya he found the Miocene ape ancestor Proconsul. He obtained funding to establish three of the most influential primatologists in their field, dubbed Leakey’s ‘ape women’; Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Birute Galdikas, who pioneered the study of chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan behaviour respectively. His second wife Mary Leakey, whom he first hired as an artefact illustrator, went on to be a great researcher in her own right, surpassing Louis’ work with her own excavations at Olduvai Gorge. Mary and Louis’ son Richard followed his parents’ career path initially, discovering many of the most important hominin fossils including KNM WT 15000 (the Nariokotome boy, a near complete Homo ergaster skeleton), KNM WT 17000 (the type specimen for Paranthropus aethiopicus), and KNM ER 1470 (the type specimen for Homo rudolfensis with an extremely well preserved Archaeopressendocranium).
    [Show full text]
  • Paranthropus Through the Looking Glass COMMENTARY Bernard A
    COMMENTARY Paranthropus through the looking glass COMMENTARY Bernard A. Wooda,1 and David B. Pattersona,b Most research and public interest in human origins upper jaw fragment from Malema in Malawi is the focuses on taxa that are likely to be our ancestors. southernmost evidence. However, most of what we There must have been genetic continuity between know about P. boisei comes from fossils from Koobi modern humans and the common ancestor we share Fora on the eastern shore of Lake Turkana (4) and from with chimpanzees and bonobos, and we want to know sites in the Nachukui Formation on the western side of what each link in this chain looked like and how it be- the lake (Fig. 1A). haved. However, the clear evidence for taxic diversity The cranial and dental morphology of P.boisei is so in the human (aka hominin) clade means that we also distinctive its remains are relatively easy to identify (5). have close relatives who are not our ancestors (1). Two Unique features include its flat, wide, and deep face, papers in PNAS focus on the behavior and paleoenvi- flexed cranial base, large and thick lower jaw, and ronmental context of Paranthropus boisei, a distinctive small incisors and canines combined with massive and long-extinct nonancestral relative that lived along- chewing teeth. The surface area available for process- side our early Homo ancestors in eastern Africa between ing food is extended both forward—by having premo- just less than 3 Ma and just over 1 Ma. Both papers use lar teeth that look like molars—and backward—by the stable isotopes to track diet during a largely unknown, unusually large third molar tooth crowns, all of which but likely crucial, period in our evolutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania.Pdf
    FEATURE Tanzania field school Shaping Students and Communities in Tanzania ummer 2007: 13 students and And, of high importance to students, it costs going way back to when I was an undergrad.” two professors from UC Denver much less than most other field schools. Musiba also reached out to universities are awakened in the middle of All of those benefits and partnerships are around the globe, including the University S the night by noises normally only the result of Musiba’s relationships with locals, of Kyoto in Japan and the Bugando University heard in a zoo. Although many lie awake in his passion for the country and his drive to College of Health Sciences in Mwanza, Tanzania. their tents, one among them sleeps peacefully. create global citizens of his students. “When I talk to people at anthropology Charles Musiba, assistant professor of meetings and tell them that our field school only anthropology, was born in Tanzania, Africa, In the Beginning costs about $4,500, I tell them that it’s because and now directs UCD’s Tanzania Field School. “I was myself a graduate student and saw that we do a lot of cost sharing with these partners.” He’s been taking I could become a bridge to Tanzania and help students to his my fellow graduate students gain access to new country for 11 years. areas for their research,” says Musiba. “But The field most existing field schools in Africa are very school is located expensive. Those run at schools like Rutgers, in the Ngorongoro Harvard and Yale cost between $6,000 to Conservation Area $7,000 just for tuition, not counting airfare.” in northern Tanzania Musiba began collaborating with people he and, according to all knew in Tanzania, and they smoothed out a accounts, it offers normally difficult process.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Humans—Origin and Early Evolution of the Genus Homo Frederick E
    The First Humans—Origin and Early Evolution of the Genus Homo Frederick E. Grine, John G. Fleagle, and Richard E. Leakey (eds.) Vertbrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. New York: Springer, 2009, 220 pp. (hardback), $129.00. ISBN-13: 9781402099793. Reviewed by PARTH R. CHAUHAN Stone Age Institute, 1392 W. Dittemore Rd., Gosport, IN 47433, USA; [email protected] EARLY HOMO COMES FULL CIRCLE OH 7. It is interesting to note that the “assault on Homo ha- his volume is a result of the third conference organized bilis” may have subsided over the decades but continues Tby Stony Brook University held in October 3–7, 2005. to persist among some scientists. One problem with this is Like some of the other workshop proceedings volumes in the low number of early Homo fossils in comparison to Aus- this conference series, this book contains chapters and con- tralopithecine fossils. tributions from different perspectives. There are 17 chap- Chapters 3 and 4 both discuss the biological beginnings ters and 31 contributors in total, all collectively covering of early Homo. While Wood (Ch. 3) takes a more comprehen- a range of topics including Plio-Pleistocene environments sive approach in his definition and criteria of recognizing and fauna, various Homo species including African speci- the earliest Homo (adaptations, diet, locomotion, dexterity), mens as well as those from Dmanisi and Liang Bua, endur- Kimbel (Ch. 4) dwells specifically on a suite of anatomical ance running, the early Homo shoulder, inter-limb propor- features, specifically the face, calvaria, mandible and denti- tions, teeth and diet, and Paleolithic archaeology. The fact tion.
    [Show full text]