<<

Brendan Krueger Phy 688, Spring 2009 May 6th, 2009  Development of the theory . Alvarez hypothesis . Periodicity of extinctions . Proposal of a solar companion  Orbit of . Proposed orbit . Current location . Stability  Detection of Nemesis . Why we haven’t seen it . Pan‐STARRS . LSST  Alternate theory . Oscillation through the galactic plane

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 2 The Alvarez hypothesis Periodicity of extinctions Proposal of a solar companion

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 3 Alvarez (1980)

 Depletion of platinum metals (Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt) on  Increased iridium coincident with Cretaceous‐ Tertiary extinction (K‐T Event)  Massive impact . Diameter: 10 ± 4 km . Abundances suggest impactor origin is solar, but extraterrestrial . Spread dust throughout atmosphere ▪ Extinction (block sunlight, etc.) ▪ Iridium‐rich layer in geologic record

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 4 Alvarez (1980)

CEE-shoe-lube Artists conception o the -T Eent (thus saith the Internets and phone calls to Mexico arent cheap)

“Maybe an Asteroid Kill the Dinosaurs”, Jeffrey Kluger, TIME, 27 April, 2009

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 5 Raup & Sepkoski (1984)

 Various periodic analysis techniques reveal spikes in the extinction record around every 30 Myr  Best fit period evidenced a cycle of 26Myr  Period‐folding the data displays a relatively sharp peak . Discrete extinction events

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 6 Raup & Sepkoski (1984)

 Various periodic analysis techniques reveal spikes in the extinction record around every 30 Myr  Best fit period evidenced a cycle of 26Myr  Period‐folding the data displays a relatively sharp peak . Discrete extinction events

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 7 Raup & Sepkoski (1984)

 Two events known to match impact events (K‐T Event and Late Eocene extinction)  Length of cycle suggests extraterrestrial source  Uncertainty in geologic time

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 8 Whitmire & Jackson (1984); Davis, Hut, Muller (1984)

 Propose a low‐mass solar companion . Late K dwarf down to / limit (magnitude 7‐12) or black hole . Highly eccentric . Widely separated  At perihelion the companion passes through the dense inner and scatters towards Earth . Several dozen (within an order of magnitude) impacts on Earth over 1‐2 Myr) Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 9 Wikipedia

 Spherical shell of . 10,000 AU – 100,000 AU  Likely ejected from inner by giant  Surrounds disc clouds . Hills Cloud (aka Inner Oort Cloud): 100 AU – 3,000 AU . : 30 AU – 55 AU

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 10 Whitmire & Jackson (1984); Davis, Hut, Muller (1984)

“If and when the companion is found, we suggest it be named Nemesis, after the Greek goddess who relentlessly persecutes the excessively rich, proud and powerful. We worry that if the companion is not found, this paper will be our nemesis.” . Davis, Hut, Muller (1984)

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 11 Proposed orbit Current location Stability

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 12 Whitmire & Jackson (1984); Davis, Hut, Muller (1984)

 Period of 26 Myr (roughly 10 cycles appear in the geologic record)  Semimajor axis around 90,000 AU (1.4 light years)  Eccentricity greater than 0.7 . Perihelion at several thousand AU (Inner Oort Cloud)  Prior to 400 Myr ago . May have been more closely bound and less eccentric . Interactions with other galactic bodies may have changed the orbit

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 13 Whitmire & Jackson (1984); Davis, Hut, Muller (1984)

 Last recorded extinction event: ~11 Myr ago  Near aphelion; ~2.4 light years away: outer edge of Oort cloud . Potentially in the direction of constellation  Next perihelion passage of Nemesis: ~15,000,000 AD  “That’s the take‐home message of the presentation: Start running around screaming because we’re all going to die.” ▪ Josh Schlieder

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 14 Nature, vol. 311 (October 18, 1984); muller.lbl.gov

 Very wide separation may not be stable . Galactic tidal forces . . Giant molecular clouds (GMCs)  Statistical arguments suggest the orbit should be unstable . Bailey’s “Nemesis for Nemesis?” editorial

 Minimum mass of 10MJ (Hills)

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 15 Nature, vol. 311 (October 18, 1984); muller.lbl.gov

 Monte Carlo analysis by Hut . Most stable when aligned with galactic plane ▪ Likely unstable for > 30o ▪ Plane of solar system: = 60o . Variation in perihelion ▪ Geologic record vs. theory . Expected to survive for another ~1 Gyr  May have started more closely bound . Interaction ~400 Myr ago increased eccentricity

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 16 Why we haven’t seen it Pan‐STARRS LSST

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 17 various sources

 Estimated magnitude is between 7 and 12 . Nearly all such objects catalogued . Very few studied for proper motion or distance . “The known stars nearest to the have been discovered either because of their high apparent brightness, their large proper motion, or their association with other nearby stars. Unfortunately, our proposed companion is likely to have none of these characteristics.” ▪ Davis, Hut, Muller (1984)  Location unknown . Based on analysis of long‐period comets: towards Hydra  Roughly 3,000 primary candidates identified for study

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 18 Wikipedia

 Panoramic Survey Telescope And Rapid Response System  Survey roughly 75% of the sky to magnitude 24  Telescopes . Four 1.8m telescopes in Hawaii . PS1: December 6th, 2008 . Final three by 2012  Will identify stars with large parallax but small proper motion . Mark for later measurements . Nemesis is believed to fall into this category

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 19 Wikipedia, LSST.org

 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope  8.4m ground‐based telescope, out to magnitude of 24‐27  Construction should begin 2010 . First light expected 2014  200,000 images (1.28 petabytes) per year . Will require advanced data mining to analyze  Could be capable of identifying Nemesis

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 20 Oscillations through galactic plane Oscillation phase

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 21 various sources

 The Solar System oscillates vertically through the  Stars and GMCs are denser near the center of the galactic plane  Rampino & Stothers quote periodicities as: . Extinctions: 30 ± 1 Myr . Galactic oscillations: 33 ± 3 Myr

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 22 various sources

 Current data estimating the position and timing of the galactic oscillation vs. extinction record . Extinction events peak when the Earth is farthest from galactic plane . Unknown how to resolve this

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 23 Summary References Questions

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 24  Apparent 26 Myr periodicity in extinction  Distant solar companion proposed . Likely a brown dwarf in a wide, eccentric orbit . Scatters Oort Cloud objects into inner Solar system  Various properties put it in an under‐studied class . Pan‐STARRS & LSST should be able to find it  Stability of orbit is in question

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 25  Alvarez (1980). ,  Raup, Sepkoski (1984). 1095–1108. , 801‐805.  Bailey (1984). , 602‐603.  Reddy et al. (2008). Asteroids,  Bhalerao, Vahia (2005). Comets, Meteors; Baltimore, , 27‐33. Maryland, USA.  Bottke (2007). , 48‐  Schwartz, James (1984). , 53. 712‐713.  Burgasser (2007). , 617‐621.  Torbett, Smoluchowski (1984).  Clube, Napier (1984). , 635‐ , 641‐642. 636.  Whitmire, Jackson (1984).  Davis, Hut, Muller (1984). , , 713‐715. 715‐717.  Wikipedia: .  Hills (1984). , 636‐638.  Wikipedia: .  Hut (1984). , 638‐641.  Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.  Kluger (2009). , “Maybe an http://www.lsst.org. Asteroid Kill the Dinosaurs.”  Wikipedia: .  Muller (2002).  Pan‐STARRS. http://pan‐ 356. starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu.  Muller. http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl‐  Wikipedia: . nem.htm. Accessed 07 April 2009.  Wikipedia: .  Rampino, Stothers (1984). , 709‐712.

Nemesis, Brendan Krueger 26