DOCSLIB.ORG

Burning Man 2012-2016 Preliminary Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burning Man 2012-2016 Preliminary Environmental Assessment BLM PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2012-0007-EA Burning Man 2012-2016 Special Recreation Permit NVW03500-12-01 Black Rock Field Office /Nevada March 2012 Nevada / Office District Winnemucca Prepared by: U.S. Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Office 5100 E. Winnemucca Blvd. Winnemucca NV 89445-2921 Cooperating Agencies: Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Nevada Department of Transportation Pershing County Washoe County It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/NV/WN/EA/12-8+1792 DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2012-0007-EA BLACK ROCK CITY LLC BURNING MAN 2012-2016 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONTENTS List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................................. ix 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Land Use Conformance Statement .................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Relationship to Laws, Regulations, and Other Plans .......................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Issues ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-5 2. Proposed Action and Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Alternative 1: 58,000 to 70,000-Person Maximum Alternative (Proposed Action) ..... 2-1 2.1.1 Event Setup and Signage ..................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Public Access ............................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.1.3 Traffic Control ............................................................................................................................................ 2-7 2.1.4 Event Security and Public Safety .................................................................................................. 2-8 2.1.5 Resource Management ....................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.1.6 Fire Management ................................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.1.7 Dust Abatement ....................................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.1.8 Runway and Aircraft ........................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.1.9 Sanitary Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 2-13 2.1.10 Event Take Down and Clean-Up ................................................................................................ 2-13 2.1.11 Permits Required .................................................................................................................................... 2-15 2.2 Alternative 2: 50,000-Person Maximum Alternative....................................................................... 2-15 2.3 Alternative 3: No Action/No Event Alternative .................................................................................. 2-16 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study .................................................. 2-17 2.4.1 Private Land Alternatives ................................................................................................................. 2-17 2.4.2 Other (Public Land) Locations Alternative ......................................................................... 2-17 2.4.3 Location Rotation Alternative ....................................................................................................... 2-18 2.4.4 Revised Access Road Alternative .............................................................................................. 2-18 2.4.5 60,000-Person Maximum Alternative ..................................................................................... 2-19 2.4.6 Less than 50,000-Person Alternative ....................................................................................... 2-19 3. Affected Environment ..................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Affected Resources .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.3 Areas of Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.1 Climate and Meteorology .................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.2 Ambient Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.3 Climate Change .......................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs) ........................................................................... 3-7 3.4 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.5 Environmental Justice ............................................................................................................................................ 3-12 March 2012 i Contents BLACK ROCK CITY LLC BURNING MAN 2012-2016 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.5.1 Population .................................................................................................................................................... 3-12 3.5.2 Demographics ........................................................................................................................................... 3-13 3.6 Invasive, Nonnative Species .............................................................................................................................. 3-14 3.7 Migratory Birds .......................................................................................................................................................... 3-15 3.7.1 Raptors ........................................................................................................................................................... 3-16 3.8 Native American Religious Concerns ........................................................................................................ 3-17 3.9 Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................................................................... 3-17 3.10 Wastes, Hazardous or Solid ............................................................................................................................... 3-18 3.10.1 Solid Waste................................................................................................................................................. 3-18 3.10.2 Hydrocarbon Wastes ............................................................................................................................ 3-19 3.10.3 Offsite Waste ............................................................................................................................................. 3-19 3.10.4 Wastewater ................................................................................................................................................. 3-19 3.10.5 Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................................................ 3-20 3.11 Water Quality ..............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rose-Marcella-Thesis-2020.Pdf
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Nebkha Morphology, Distribution and Stability Black Rock Playa, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Geography By Marcella Rose December 2019 The thesis of Marcella Rose is approved: _______________________________________ _____________ Dr. Julie Laity Date _______________________________________ _____________ Dr. Thomas Farr Date _______________________________________ _____________ Dr. Amalie Orme, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgements Dr. Orme, I really don’t think that there is a sufficient combination of words that exist to properly express the immense amount of gratitude I feel for everything that you have done for me. This college education changed my life for the better and I hope you realize what a significant role you were within that experience. I am thankful that not only did I get a great professor, but also a friend. Dr. Laity, thank you so much for having faith in me and for taking me on as one of your last students to advise. But most of all, thank you for pushing me to be better – I needed that. Dr. Farr, I was so excited during DEVELOP that you accepted to be a part of my committee. It was a pleasure to work with you within the Black Rock Playa research team but then to also take our research a step further for this graduate thesis. I would also like to thank the staff at the Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca: Dr. Mark E. Hall, Field Manager of the Black Rock Field Office; Shane Garside, Black Rock Station Manager/ Outdoor Recreation Planner; Brian McMillan, Rangeland Management Technician; and Braydon Gaard, Interim Outdoor Recreation Planner.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Siteworks Collection CAE1503
    William Binzen: Desert Siteworks Collection CAE1503 Introduction/Abstract William Binzen created singular images to accompany his Desert Siteworks project from 1992-1994. Desert Siteworks was a summer solstice celebration held annually before Burning Man. Materials include color photographs and backstories to each one, video, and printed ephemera. Biographical Note: William Binzen William Binzen received his MFA from the San Francisco Art Institute, and has produced a variety of portfolios using 8 x 10, medium format and 35mm film; Polaroid, digital and plastic cameras. William lives in the Marin hills of northern California, where he divides his time between photography and creating layered musical compositions based on improvisation. Scope and Content Binzen, along with John Law and Kevin Evans from the San Francisco Cacophony Society, convinced Burning Man co-founder Larry Harvey to move his event to the Black Rock playa in 1990 when Harvey and company were barred from using Baker Beach in the city for the gathering. Binzen knew that local ceramicist John Bogard and friends played giant croquet during the summer using pickup trucks as mallets, and believed that Harvey could bring the sculpture out to the desert to burn without being bothered by law enforcement. Binzen was also instrumental in later helping to make art a major focus of Burning Man, bringing his architectonic sculpture, "Desert House," to the playa in 1992, where it served as the predecessor of the Central Camp. Binzen created singular medium-format, double exposure images of his Desert Siteworks project from 1992- 1994. His intent was to make magical realist images that communicated a deeper reality about the feeling and spirit of the event.
    [Show full text]
  • DECISION RECORD Burning Man 2012·2016 Special Recreation Permit Environmental Assessment DOI·BLM·NV·W030·2012·0007 ·EA
    DECISION RECORD Burning Man 2012·2016 Special Recreation Permit Environmental Assessment DOI·BLM·NV·W030·2012·0007 ·EA INTRODUCTION The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Winnemucca District (WD), Black Rock Field Office (BRFO) has completed the Burning Man 2012-2016 Special Recreation Permit (SRP) Environmental Assessment (EA), DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2012-0007-EA. The EA analyzes the impacts associated with Black Rock City LLC's proposal for the 2012-2016 permit/events which include a participant population level from 58,000 to 70,000 participants during the 5-year period. The event would be held on public lands in Pershing County, Nevada on the barren playa of the Black Rock Desert, approximately 10 miles northeast of the community of Gerlach, Nevada. With the exception of 1997, the event has been held in this area since 1992, with the issuance of Special Recreation Permits (SRPs). The operations associated with the event occupy about 4,400 acres of public land for a seven week period starting with fencing the site perimeter the second week of August and concluding in late September with the final site cleanup. The major activities involving final setup, the actual event, and the initial phases of cleanup are confined to several weeks in late August and early September. During this period, Black Rock City becomes one of the largest cities in Nevada. In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality regulations at 40 CFR 1500 for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the BLM BRFO prepared an environmental analysis of the proposed project.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Volume 1
    U.S. Department of the Interior March 2019 Bureau of Land Management Black Rock Field Office Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Volume 1 COSTS BLM: $280,000 Proponent: $922,468 MISSION STATEMENT It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT BURNING MAN EVENT SPECIAL RECREATION PERMIT LEAD AGENCY: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca District Office, Black Rock Field Office COOPERATING AGENCIES: US Department of Homeland Security US Environmental Protection Agency US Federal Bureau of Investigation Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Nevada Department of Transportation Humboldt County Pershing County Pershing County Sheriff’s Office Washoe County PROJECT LOCATION: Pershing County, Nevada COMMENTS ON THIS DRAFT EIS Dr. Mark Hall, PhD SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: EIS Project Manager Black Rock Field Office 5100 East Winnemucca Blvd. Winnemucca, Nevada 86445 (775) 623-1500 [email protected] PROJECT WEBSITE: https://go.usa.gov/xnBTu ABSTRACT This Draft Environmental Impact Statement analyzes the potential impacts associated with a proposed multi-year Special Recreation Permit for Black Rock City, LLC to produce the Burning Man Event annually from 2019 to 2028. The Burning Man Event is an annual gathering in the Black Rock Desert of northwest Nevada. The Event takes place on Black Rock Desert Playa 8.5 miles northeast of Gerlach, Nevada, and approximately 100 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. The primary component of the Proposed Action includes an incremental population increase of 5,000 per year, starting at 85,000 bodies on playa (including participants and BRC staff and volunteers, and excluding government personnel and vendors) in 2019, reaching a maximum population of 100,000 in 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistory and History of the Winnemucca District : a Cultural
    BLM LIBRARY BL D MANAGEMENT NE 88000265 PREHISTORY and HISTORY of t\)e WINNEMUCCA DISTRICT A Cultural Resources Literature Overview REGINA C. SMITH PEGGY McGUCKIAN JONES JOHN R. RONEY KATHRYN E. PEDRICK CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 6 1983 NEVADA BLM CULTURAL RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS Technical Reports No. 1 Studies at Adams -McGill Reservoir: Exercises in Applying Small Project Data to Archaeological Research . Robert York (Nov. 1977). ca. 18 pp. No. 2 Archaeological Survey of Springs, Tonopah Resource Area . Roberta L. McGonagle and Lynda L. Waski (Feb. 1978). 60 pp. No. 3 Oil and Gas/Geothermal Program Inventories . Nancy Botti, Peggy McGuckian, Robert York and Mark Henderson (June 1979). ca. Ill pp. No. 4 Artifact Assemblages from the Pahranagat, Lincoln County, Nevada . Robert H. Crabtree and David D. Ferraro (Jan. 1980). 74 pp. No. 5 Test Excavations at Painted Cave, Pershing County, Nevada . James C. Bard, Colin I. Busby and Larry S. Kobori (Feb. 1980). 153 pp. No. 6 Emigrant Trails in the Black Rock Desert . Peggy McGuckian Jones (Apr. 1980). 110 pp. No. 7 An Historic Overview of the BLM Shoshone-Eureka Resource Area, Nevada . Patrick H. Welch (1981). 47 pp. No. 8. Archaeological Studies in the Cortez Mining District, 1981 . Donald L. Hardesty and Eugene M. Hattori (1982). 59 pp. No. 9 The History and Archaeology of Fenelon, a Historic Railroad Camp . Arnie L. Turner (1982). 61 pp. Cultural Resources Series No. 1 The Pony Express in Central Nevada: Archaeological and Documentary Perspectives . Donald L. Hardesty (1979). 175 pp. No. 2 A Cultural Resources Overview of the Carson $ Humboldt Sinks, Nevada .
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology MACKAY SCHOOL of MINES
    Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO NEVADA LOW-TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: 1994 By: Larry J. Garside FINAL REPORT Prepared for The Oregon Institute of Technology GeoHeat Center Prepared as part of a study of low- to -moderate temperature geothermal resources of Nevada under the U.S. Department of Energy Low-Temperature Geothermal Resources and Technology Transfer Program CONTENTS FIGURES 1. Map of mean annual temperatures ........................... 10 2. Temperature vs. number of geothermal occurrences ---------- 15 3. Map of Nevada geothermal resource occurrences ------------- 16 Plate 1. Million-scale map of geothermal resource occurrences 1 INTRODUCTION Previous Geothermal Assessments A statewide inventory of the geology and geochemistry of Nevada's geothermal resources was begun at the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (NBMG) in the late 1970s. NBMG had previously published a 1:1,000,000-scale map of hot springs, sinters, and volcanic cinder cones (Horton, 1964b) and several brief summaries of Nevada's geothermal resources (Horton, 1964a; Garside and Schilling, 1972; Garside, 1974). This inventory, published as NBMG Bulletin 91 (Garside and Schilling, 1979), followed a format used in a number of NBMG publications on mineral commodities of Nevada. The bulletin contained descriptions, by county and hot spring area, of the better known geothermal areas, These descriptions included, where available, maps and other data on the geology, and descriptions of historical and present use. Temperature and water chemistry data were presented in an appendix having about 1,400 individual entries (records). These records commonly included multiple entries for the same or adjacent springs as well as numerous well records from geothermal areas which have a larger areal extent than individual spring sites.
    [Show full text]