DOCSLIB.ORG

Effects of Climate Change on Plague Exposure Pathways and Resulting Disease Dynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Effects of Climate Change on Plague Exposure Pathways and Resulting Disease Dynamics Final Report SERDP Number 16 RC01-012 Principal Investigator: Dr. Tonie E. Rocke, U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center Co-Investigators: Dr. Robin Russell, U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center Dr. Michael Samuel, University of Wisconsin, Madison Co-authors: Rachel Abbott, U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center Julia Poje, University of Wisconsin, Madison May 12, 2020 i Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 05/12/2020 SERDP Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Effects of Climate Change on Plague Exposure Pathways and Resulting Disease Dynamics 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Dr. Tonie E. Rocke, Dr. Robin Russell and Rachel Abbott RC-2634 U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center 5e. TASK NUMBER Dr. Michael Samuel University of Wisconsin, Madison 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center REPORT NUMBER 6006 Schroeder Road 16 RC01-012 Madison, WI 53711 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program SERDP 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 17D03 Alexandria, VA 22350-3605 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) RC-2634 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT Sylvatic plague, a zoonotic flea-borne disease, caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, is relevant to the Department of Defense (DOD), because prairie dogs and other susceptible rodents are present on military installations in several western states. Arthropod-borne diseases, like plague, are thought to be particularly sensitive to local climate conditions. Expected changes in temperature and humidity over the next several decades will likely increase the geographical expansion of plague outbreaks in wildlife. Through a combination of field and laboratory work, along with data-driven modeling, we evaluated the potential effects of climate change on plague exposure pathways in prairie dogs and associated rodents to provide guidance to DOD partners regarding the potential for future outbreaks. Briefly, our specific objectives were to determine the relation between local climate conditions and the prevalence of plague and other pathogens while assessing the ecological roles of specific rodent hosts and vector species in plague dynamics, evaluate flea intensity on rodent hosts and in burrows in relation to local climate conditions, and develop models to predict the effects of climate change on plague dynamics. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Climate change, Cynomys spp., fleas, non-target rodents, Oropsylla spp., Peromyscus, plague, sylvatic plague vaccine, prairie dogs, Yersinia pestis 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON ABSTRACT OF a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE PAGES Tonie E. Rocke 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) UNCLASS UNCLASS UNCLASS UNCLASS 125 608-270-2451 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. List of Appendices ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... vi Keywords ...................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 8 Technical Approach .................................................................................................................. 8 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Benefits. ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 9 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 9 Aim 1: Ecological studies. ..................................................................................................... 9 Aim 2: Vector biology............................................................................................................ 9 Aim 3: Modeling impacts of climate change on plague dynamics. ................................... 9 Technical Approach ................................................................................................................ 10 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 13 Implications for Future Research and Benefits .................................................................... 18 Final Report ................................................................................................................................. 19 Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 19 Aim 1: Ecological studies. ................................................................................................... 19 Aim 2: Vector biology.......................................................................................................... 19 Aim 3: Modeling impacts of climate change on plague dynamics. ................................. 20 Background .............................................................................................................................. 20 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................... 21 Aim 1: Ecological studies. ................................................................................................... 21 Aim 2: Vector Biology. ........................................................................................................ 24 Aim 3: Modeling impacts of climate change on plague dynamics. ................................. 26 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 29 ii Aim 1: Ecological studies. ................................................................................................... 29 Aim 2: Vector Biology. ........................................................................................................ 33 Aim 3: Modeling impacts of climate change on plague dynamics. ................................. 40 Conclusions and Implications for Future Research/Implementation ................................ 44 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................... 46 Appendices ............................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 1............................................................................................................................ 52 Appendix 2............................................................................................................................ 53 Appendix 3...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • How Much Do You Know About Fleas, Ticks, Mites and Other Biters? by Vet Glen Cousquer C Norris

    How Much Do You Know About Fleas, Ticks, Mites and Other Biters? by Vet Glen Cousquer C Norris

    Artful arthropods How much do you know about fleas, ticks, mites and other biters? By vet Glen Cousquer C Norris robably the most historically significant and well known arthropod-borne disease was the “Black Death”. This scourge of the Middle Ages, also known as the Bubonic Plague, killed Pbetween 30 and 60 per cent of Europe’s human population during the 14th Century. This bacterial disease was carried by black rats (Rattus rattus) and transmitted from the rat to humans by the Oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis). The flea was able to pick up the disease when feeding on rats and then transfer Cheyletiella mites result in the appearance the disease when feeding again on humans. At the time, the of scurf and bald patches in the fur various contributing causes of this devastating disease remained G Cousquer obscure. Our ancestors were largely ignorant of the role played transmit diseases to rabbits. Many of the most important rabbit by the rat, the flea, poor hygiene and inadequate sanitation and diseases are transmitted in this way and we need a detailed this severely hampered their attempts to deal with outbreaks. understanding of the process involved if we are to protect our Today, it is this understanding of how disease can be carried rabbits’ health and welfare. by reservoirs and then transmitted by vectors that allows us to mount more effective responses to such disease threats. So, what are the common arthropod parasites found feeding on rabbits? This feature will look at how certain arthropods play key roles in the transmission of diseases to rabbits.
  • TICKS in RELATION to HUMAN DISEASES CAUSED by <I

    TICKS in RELATION to HUMAN DISEASES CAUSED by <I

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Navy Research U.S. Department of Defense 1967 TICKS IN RELATION TO HUMAN DISEASES CAUSED BY RICKETTSIA SPECIES Harry Hoogstraal Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usnavyresearch This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Navy Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TICKS IN RELATION TO HUMAN DISEASES CAUSED BY RICKETTSIA SPECIES1,2 By HARRY HOOGSTRAAL Department oj Medical Zoology, United States Naval Medical Research Unit Number Three, Cairo, Egypt, U.A.R. Rickettsiae (185) are obligate intracellular parasites that multiply by binary fission in the cells of both vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. They are pleomorphic coccobacillary bodies with complex cell walls containing muramic acid, and internal structures composed of ribonucleic and deoxyri­ bonucleic acids. Rickettsiae show independent metabolic activity with amino acids and intermediate carbohydrates as substrates, and are very susceptible to tetracyclines as well as to other antibiotics. They may be considered as fastidious bacteria whose major unique character is their obligate intracellu­ lar life, although there is at least one exception to this. In appearance, they range from coccoid forms 0.3 J.I. in diameter to long chains of bacillary forms. They are thus intermediate in size between most bacteria and filterable viruses, and form the family Rickettsiaceae Pinkerton. They stain poorly by Gram's method but well by the procedures of Macchiavello, Gimenez, and Giemsa.
  • WHAT IS MYXOMATOSIS? After Its Introduction to the UK in the Early 1950’S Myxomatosis Was So Virulent That an Estimated 95% of Wild and Pet Rabbits Had Died by 1955

    WHAT IS MYXOMATOSIS? After Its Introduction to the UK in the Early 1950’S Myxomatosis Was So Virulent That an Estimated 95% of Wild and Pet Rabbits Had Died by 1955

    WHAT IS MYXOMATOSIS? After its introduction to the UK in the early 1950’s myxomatosis was so virulent that an estimated 95% of wild and pet rabbits had died by 1955. In the year 2000 we again experienced one of the worst outbreaks of Myxomatosis ever recorded, and this disease is still affecting rabbits, particularly during the late summer/ autumn season. Below: edited extracts from an article written by Dr Linda Dykes, published in Fur & Feather’s November 2000 issue. yxomatosis is a rabbit will be a pitiful sight. Severe viral disease which conjunctivitis causes blindness and decimated the wild is accompanied by swelling of the Mrabbit population when it head and genital region plus lumps arrived in Britain nearly seventy on the body. years ago. The number and The rabbit can take a fortnight to severity of outbreaks varies over die and treatment of the “classic” time as the myxomatosis virus form of myxomatosis is usually is notorious for its ability to futile. mutate from year to year, and the background immunity in There are also two atypical forms the wild rabbit population also of myxomatosis: one causes varies. pneumonia and a snuffles-like illness; the other (“nodular Be especially careful if you have a being a bit “off colour” with a few Rabbits at myxomatosis”) mainly affects skin Greatest Risk dog or cat that hunts wild rabbits, skin lesions. and carries a better prognosis. Domestic rabbits do not have as they could bring rabbit fleas Treatment is usually successful any genetically based immunity If a vaccinated rabbit does develop home or into the rabbitry on their in the vaccinated rabbit with a against myxomatosis.
  • Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?

    Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?

    2010 Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What can we predict about the spread of vector-borne zoonotic diseases? Ph.D. Dissertation Megan M. Friggens School of Forestry I I I \, l " FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? by Megan M. Friggens A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science Northern Arizona University May 2010 ?Jii@~-~-u-_- Robert R. Parmenter, Ph. D. ~",l(*~ l.~ Paulette L. Ford, Ph. D. --=z:r-J'l1jU~ David M. Wagner, Ph. D. ABSTRACT FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? MEGAN M. FRIGGENS Vector-borne diseases of humans and wildlife are experiencing resurgence across the globe. I examine the dynamics of flea borne diseases through a comparative analysis of flea literature and analyses of field data collected from three sites in New Mexico: The Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, the Sandia Mountains and the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP). My objectives were to use these analyses to better predict and manage for the spread of diseases such as plague (Yersinia pestis). To assess the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on flea communities, I compiled and analyzed data from 63 published empirical studies. Anthropogenic disturbance is associated with conditions conducive to increased transmission of flea-borne diseases. Most measures of flea infestation increased with increasing disturbance or peaked at intermediate levels of disturbance. Future trends of habitat and climate change will probably favor the spread of flea-borne disease.
  • Comparative Ability of Oropsylla Montana and Xenopsylla Cheopis Fleas to Transmit Yersinia Pestis by Two Different Mechanisms

    Comparative Ability of Oropsylla Montana and Xenopsylla Cheopis Fleas to Transmit Yersinia Pestis by Two Different Mechanisms

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparative Ability of Oropsylla montana and Xenopsylla cheopis Fleas to Transmit Yersinia pestis by Two Different Mechanisms B. Joseph Hinnebusch*, David M. Bland, Christopher F. Bosio, Clayton O. Jarrett Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Background Transmission of Yersinia pestis by flea bite can occur by two mechanisms. After taking a blood meal from a bacteremic mammal, fleas have the potential to transmit the very next OPEN ACCESS time they feed. This early-phase transmission resembles mechanical transmission in some Citation: Hinnebusch BJ, Bland DM, Bosio CF, respects, but the mechanism is unknown. Thereafter, transmission occurs after Yersinia Jarrett CO (2017) Comparative Ability of Oropsylla pestis forms a biofilm in the proventricular valve in the flea foregut. The biofilm can impede montana and Xenopsylla cheopis Fleas to Transmit and sometimes completely block the ingestion of blood, resulting in regurgitative transmis- Yersinia pestis by Two Different Mechanisms. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(1): e0005276. doi:10.1371/ sion of bacteria into the bite site. In this study, we compared the relative efficiency of the two journal.pntd.0005276 modes of transmission for Xenopsylla cheopis, a flea known to become completely blocked Editor: Christian Johnson, Fondation Raoul at a high rate, and Oropsylla montana, a flea that has been considered to rarely develop pro- Follereau, FRANCE ventricular blockage. Received: June 22, 2016 Methodology/Principal findings Accepted: December 21, 2016 Fleas that took an infectious blood meal containing Y.
  • Fleas and Flea-Borne Diseases

    Fleas and Flea-Borne Diseases

    International Journal of Infectious Diseases 14 (2010) e667–e676 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Infectious Diseases journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijid Review Fleas and flea-borne diseases Idir Bitam a, Katharina Dittmar b, Philippe Parola a, Michael F. Whiting c, Didier Raoult a,* a Unite´ de Recherche en Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales Emergentes, CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculte´ de Me´decine, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France b Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA c Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA ARTICLE INFO SUMMARY Article history: Flea-borne infections are emerging or re-emerging throughout the world, and their incidence is on the Received 3 February 2009 rise. Furthermore, their distribution and that of their vectors is shifting and expanding. This publication Received in revised form 2 June 2009 reviews general flea biology and the distribution of the flea-borne diseases of public health importance Accepted 4 November 2009 throughout the world, their principal flea vectors, and the extent of their public health burden. Such an Corresponding Editor: William Cameron, overall review is necessary to understand the importance of this group of infections and the resources Ottawa, Canada that must be allocated to their control by public health authorities to ensure their timely diagnosis and treatment. Keywords: ß 2010 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Flea Siphonaptera Plague Yersinia pestis Rickettsia Bartonella Introduction to 16 families and 238 genera have been described, but only a minority is synanthropic, that is they live in close association with The past decades have seen a dramatic change in the geographic humans (Table 1).4,5 and host ranges of many vector-borne pathogens, and their diseases.
  • Wildlife Disease Monitor 2014

    Wildlife Disease Monitor 2014

    WILDLIFE DISEASE MONITORING IN SWEDEN 2014 Editors: Jonas Malmsten, Erik Ågren Authors: Caroline Bröjer, Gete Hestvik, Aleksija Neimanis, Jonas Malmsten, Torsten Mörner, Henrik Uhlhorn, Erik Ågren Photo, front page: Jim Hallander Layout: Gun-Britt Rydén, Jonas Malmsten Suggested citation: Wildlife disease monitoring in Sweden 2014. National Veterinary Institute, SVA, Uppsala, Sweden. SVA´s report series 33, ISSN 1654-7098 Address: Ulls väg 2 B, 751 89 Uppsala telephone. +46 18 67 40 00 fax. +46 18 30 91 62 e-mail. [email protected] webb. www.sva.se Table of contents Foreword ....................................................... 1 Wild boar as carriers of pathogenic Wildlife disease surveillance in Sweden ......... 2 agents ..................................................... 13 Staff working with Wildlife disease Bird flu monitoring ................................... 13 investigations in 2014 ................................ 2 Investigation of moose calf mortality on Wildlife diseases and increased mortality Öland ...................................................... 14 events of interest 2014 .................................. 3 Pasteurellosis in fallow deer .................... 14 Bird flu virus in harbour seals .................... 3 PCR diagnosis of trichomonas infection in Fox tapeworm – EchinococcosIS .............. 3 wild birds ................................................. 14 Mortality event in fallow deer ..................... 3 Salmonella in hedgehogs ........................ 15 Trichomoniasis in Greenfinches ...............
  • CDFA List of Reportable Conditions for Animals and Animal Products

    CDFA List of Reportable Conditions for Animals and Animal Products

    January 2021 ANIMAL HEALTH BRANCH LIST OF REPORTABLE CONDITIONS FOR ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS* *Pursuant to Section 9101 of the California Food and Agricultural Code, Title 3 California Code of Regulations § 797 and Title 9 Code of Federal Regulations Section 161.4(f) WHO MUST REPORT: Any licensed veterinarian, any person operating a diagnostic laboratory, or any person who has been informed, recognizes or should recognize by virtue of education, experience, or occupation, that any animal or animal product is or may be affected by, or has been exposed to, or may be transmitting or carrying any of the following conditions, must report that information. WHAT TO REPORT: Immediately report any animal disease not known to exist in the United States, any event with increased mortality and/or morbidity of unknown cause or source and any toxicology condition likely to contaminate animals or animal products (meat, milk or eggs). CALL IF YOU SEE: high morbidity or mortality, vesicles, CNS signs, uncommon ticks, hemorrhagic septicemias, unusual larvae in wounds, unusual or unexplained illness. Report any emergency, regulatory, or monitored condition within the provided time frame. Some diseases are listed under the major species of concern; if you see compatible signs for such conditions in another species, please report! EMERGENCY CONDITIONS REGULATORY CONDITIONS MONITORED CONDITIONS Report within 24 Hours of Discovery Report within Two Days of Discovery Report within 30 Days of Discovery MULTIPLE SPECIES MULTIPLE SPECIES MULTIPLE SPECIES • Brucellosis (B. melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis)1 • Bluetongue General, non-specific conditions: Unexplained high • Pseudorabies (Aujeszky’s disease) • Echinococcosis/hydatidosis (Echinococcus species) mortality or diseased animals; livestock exposed to toxic • Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis)1 • Epizootic hemorrhagic disease substances.
  • Morphological and Molecular Characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides Spp Isolated from Dogs in North of Received: 06-05-2016

    Morphological and Molecular Characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides Spp Isolated from Dogs in North of Received: 06-05-2016

    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(4): 713-717 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Morphological and molecular characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides spp isolated from dogs in north of Received: 06-05-2016 Accepted: 07-06-2016 Iran Amrollah Azarm Department of Medical Amrollah Azarm, Abdolhossin Dalimi, Mahdi Mohebali, Anita Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammadiha and Zabihollah Zarei Tarbit Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Abstract The main aim of the present study was to assess the infestation level of Ctenocephalides spp on domestic Abdolhossin Dalimi dogs in Meshkinshahr County, located in Ardabil province (north of Iran). A total of 20 domestic dogs Department of Medical were randomly selected for this study. After flea combing, results revealed that 100% of the dogs were Parasitology and Entomology, infested with fleas. A total number of 942 fleas were collected. Two species were identified, of which Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbit Modares University, Ctenocephalides canis the most abundant (98.73%) was followed by C. felis (1.27%). The dog flea, C. Tehran, Iran. canis was the most common flea infesting 100% dogs and C. felis was identified on 7/20 (35%).The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences of C. canis and C. felis collected from dogs to clarify the Mahdi Mohebali taxonomic status of these species. The results of PCR assay and sequence analysis did not show clear Department of Medical molecular differences between C. canis and C. felis. Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran Keywords: Flea, Ctenocephalides canis, C.
  • The Evolution of Flea-Borne Transmission in Yersinia Pestis

    The Evolution of Flea-Borne Transmission in Yersinia Pestis

    Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 7: 197–212. Online journal at www.cimb.org The Evolution of Flea-borne Transmission in Yersinia pestis B. Joseph Hinnebusch al., 1999; Hinchcliffe et al., 2003; Chain et al., 2004). Presumably, the change from the food- and water-borne Laboratory of Human Bacterial Pathogenesis, Rocky transmission of the Y. pseudotuberculosis ancestor to Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy the flea-borne transmission of Y. pestis occurred during and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, this evolutionarily short period of time. The monophyletic Hamilton, MT 59840 USA relationship of these two sister-species implies that the genetic changes that underlie the ability of Y. pestis to use Abstract the flea for its transmission vector are relatively few and Transmission by fleabite is a recent evolutionary adaptation discrete. Therefore, the Y. pseudotuberculosis –Y. pestis that distinguishes Yersinia pestis, the agent of plague, species complex provides an interesting case study in from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and all other enteric the evolution of arthropod-borne transmission. Some of bacteria. The very close genetic relationship between Y. the genetic changes that led to flea-borne transmission pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis indicates that just a few have been identified using the rat flea Xenopsylla cheopis discrete genetic changes were sufficient to give rise to flea- as model organism, and an evolutionary pathway can borne transmission. Y. pestis exhibits a distinct infection now be surmised. Reliance on the flea for transmission phenotype in its flea vector, and a transmissible infection also imposed new selective pressures on Y. pestis that depends on genes that are specifically required in the help explain the evolution of increased virulence in this flea, but not the mammal.
  • FACT SHEET Fleas Ctenocephalidesfelis

    FACT SHEET Fleas Ctenocephalidesfelis

    FACT SHEET Fleas Ctenocephalidesfelis There are about 60 different species of flea in Britain. All species are parasites (i.e. they need a host animal to live off). Many of these are associated with particular animals, so the dog flea, cat flea, and bird flea are all slightly different species. The human flea is very rare, but unfortunately although the different species of flea prefer to feed on their specific host, they will bite other hosts if they are hungry enough. Most of the flea infestations found in houses and on people are cat fleas. Although still common, fleas have problems living in modern houses, as they like a little humidity and undisturbed surroundings. Central heating, vacuum cleaners and regular washing of bedding in washing machines all make life more difficult for the flea than in previous centuries. Although during an infestation of fleas you will often find them on pets, or may see one on your clothing, these fleas are only moving out from their living areas to feed. They do not live on the host animal all the time. Life Cycle The life cycle starts with a female flea laying eggs. These eggs are not usually found on the animal, but are on the floor or in the animals bedding area. The eggs hatch into larvae within 2 or 3 days and feed on any debris they can find in the cracks of floorboards and around areas where cats, dogs or birds have their regular bedding or resting places. After about 3 – 4 weeks the larvae spin a silk cocoon and inside this cocoon they turn into the adult flea.
  • Common Rabbit Pathogens

    Common Rabbit Pathogens

    Common Rabbit Pathogens Encephalitozoon Cuniculi Encephalitozoonosis is caused by Encephalitozoon cuniculi. About 80% of healthy rabbits carry the pathogen, without any clinical signs developing. Clinical disease can present with the following clinical signs: torticollis, ataxia, uveitis, posterior paresis and urinary incontinence. Other clinical signs can occur depending on the particular organs involved (such as hepatic and renal disease). Transmission is by infectious spores excreted primarily in the urine but also in the faeces and transmission can occur both orally and nasally. A pregnant doe can pass the pathogen on to her offspring in utero. The disease is a zoonosis and is an emerging human pathogen. Detection is now available by two methods both the traditional serology, giving antibody titres, to enable monitoring of clinical cases or detection of active shedding by PCR. The options available to help diagnose E. cuniculi are: Serology An IgG titre is the most commonly used test, this indicates long term exposure. Levels continue to rise steadily from 30 days post primary infection until they peak at 70 days. An IgM titre is now also available and can be used in conjunction with the IgG. IgM indicates early exposure and new infection in the initial 35 days prior to IgG detection. The sample required is serum (not from a gel tube). PCR No special medium is required for this test, a sample of urine, CSF or faeces simply needs to be placed in to a sterile universal tube. The sensitivity of this test is 96%, the specificity has yet to be measured. E. cuniculi can be intermittently shed, so a 3 day pooled sample should be taken.