1 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Community Assessment: Nablus and Tubas Governorates – West Bank, Palestine – March 2020

CONDUCTED BY: The Palestinian Hydrology Group (PHG)

FUNDED BY: Ajuntament de València

FUNDED THROUGH: Asamblea de Cooperación Por la Paz (ACPP)

Prepared and written by: Project and Team Leader: Dr. Ayman Rabi

Project Coordinator: Eng. Abdulrauf Aburahma

Field Survey Team: Eng. Sahira Gh. Kusa Eng. Kanan Suwadeh

2 TABLE OF FIGURES I

Acronyms II Executive Summary 1 I: Background 4

II: Methodology 6 1. Selecting the Target Communities 6 2. Creation of a coordination group 6 3. Data collection tools on water and sanitation 6 4. Data Base Design9 7 5. Data processing, analysis and storage into the database 6. Data dissemination and accessibility 7

III: Availability and Accessibility to Water and Sanitation in 8 Palestine 8 1. Water Resources: 9 2. Water Supply Quantity and Service Coverage 3. Wastewater Situation 10 4. Water Governance 11 IV: Major Findings of the WASH Situation in the 63 Communities & Proposed Response 13 TABL E OF CONTENTS TABL 1. Introduction. 13 2. Water Supply Quantity and Quality 13 3. Water Service Condition and Reliability 14 4. Wastewater and Solidwaste Serivce Conditions 17 5. Gender and Water 18 6. Major WASH Needs 19

APPENDIXES 27 APPENDIX–A: Surveyed Communities 28 APPENDIX–B: Questionnaire 31 APPENDIX–C: Tables & Maps 34 Figure1: Service coverage in both West Bank and Gaza 10

Figure 2: Volume of treated effluent that flows west and east 11 and its treatment condition

Figure 3: Supplied versus demand water quantities 13

Figure 4: Water Supply and demand of each community 14

Figure 5: Monthly Water Supply Frequency 14

Figure 6: Water Pressure in the Network 15

Figure 7: Comparing water price from network versus tankers 15

Figure 8: Per capita daily water use 16

Figure 9: Water Losses 16

Figure 10: Access to Water and Sanitation 17

Figure 11: Wastewater Network Coverage 17

TABL EOF FIGURES TABL Figure 12: Solidwaste Disposal 18

Figure 13: Gender Representation in WaSH 18

4

I ACRONUMS CM CA ACPP WHO WBWD WBGS WaSH MP WaSH USAID UNRWA UNICEF PCBS PWA PHG PCBS PA orPNA oPt OCHA NWC NSU NIS NGO MoH MoA MCM MAS M&A LCD JWU JWC INGOs ICRC ICJ GDP GS EPA CMWU Cubic Meters (m Civil Administration Asamblea deCooperacio’n porlaPaz World HealthOrganization West BankWater Department West BankandGaza Strip Water, Sanitation,andHygieneMonitoringProgram Water, Sanitation,and Hygiene ment United StatesAgency for International Develop- United NationsRelief andWorks Agency United NationsChildren’s Fund The Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics Palestinian Water Authority Palestinian Hydrology Group Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics Palestinian NationalAuthority occupied Palestinian territory Office forthe Coordination ofHumanitarian Affairs National Water Council Negotiations SupportUnit New Israeli Shekel Non-governmental Organization Ministry of Health Ministry of Agriculture Million Cubic Meters Palestinian Economic Policy Research Institute Movement andAccess Litres percapitaday Jerusalem Water Undertaking Joint Water Committee International Non-governmental Organizations International Committee of theRed Cross International Court of Justice Gross DomesticProduct Gaza Strip United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency Coastal Municipalities Water Utility 2 ) II Executive Summary Executive Summary

Water availability and access to the Palestinian communities have deteriorated over the past decade due to increased Israeli restriction and policies that limited the Palestinian ability from developing and managing their water resources properly. Since the signature of Oslo Interim Agreement back in 1995, water made available to Palestinians has dropped by 14 MCM, it was 118 MCM at the time of signature, the figure that was also agreed in the interim agreement to nearly 104 MCM in 2015. This reduction combined with other Israeli policies have influenced the supply quantities from Palestinian local water resources as well as limited per capita water use to vary from 70 l/day in the best cases to as low as 20l/d in the marginal communities and increased the reliance of Palestinians to the purchased water from Israeli company making their water security very law and bound to the Israeli merit. Moreover, poor services related to water supply and limitation on physical infrastructure for both water and wastewater have left nearly 68% of the population in the West Bank not served with wastewater collection and treatment systems. Despite all the efforts made by the Palestinian Government to coup with this difficult situation including sector reform, adopting a new water law and developing long and short-term strat- egies, the water and sanitation situation remains fragile since the final say is within the Israeli hands and subject to their approval. This situation clearly tells that ending Israeli occupation is a prerequisite for Palestinians to be able develop and prosper and assuming full sovereignty over their land and natural resources.

Under these circumstances the current project titled “Deep preparation and improved response capacity to address the water shortages affecting Palestinian communities in the West Bank through increased effectiveness of civil society participation and institutions in the coordina- tion and monitoring of water resources, water and sanitation” funded by Ayuntamient de Valan- cia through Asamblea de Cooperación por la Paz (ACPP) and implemented during 2019 - 2020 by Palestinian Hydrology Group (PHG).

The project had assessed the water and sanitation situation in 63 communities in the West Bank to highlight the main obstacles and to propose appropriate response that could address these obstacles through providing updated and standardized information to all agencies working in the WASH sector in Palestine.

The project aims to improve the living conditions of the people of the West Bank through the availability of harmonized, up-to-date, complete and reliable data on access to water, result- ing in better and more effective interventions in development cooperation and humanitarian aid projects. The project also aims to improve coordination and responsiveness between these actors, both governmental and international agencies; international and Palestinian organiza- tions working in the water and sanitation sector in the West Bank, in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt).

1 Executive Summary

The main activities accomplished under the project can be summarized as follows:

- Coordination and harmonization of data with relevant stakeholders involved in WASH data collection (the monitoring group) which includes representatives from ACPP, PHG, the Palestinian Water Authority (PWA), the United Nations WASH Cluster (led by UNICEF) and Civil Society Organizations through the EWASH platform. - Strengthen coordination, harmonize mechanisms for the data collection on ac- cess to WASH, and water quality among WASH actors through adopting harmonized tools and questionnaire for monitoring and data collection in APPENDIX-B as well as on gender training. - Colloect data from 63 communities in Nablus and Tubas Area. It is good to mention that PHG has adopted a new technique for data collection, where the data collection tool has been transformed into digital format as an application on tablets - Tablet Data Collection (TDC) instead of paper-based method in order to help improve the quality of data, analysis and decision-making. Furthermore, Tablet-based method has many other advantages over paper-based alternatives such as fewer errors, data consistency, better quality control, faster data collection and analysis.

- A special web-based software was designed to receive collected data. Data was then checked, verified, and then entered into special database that was designed specifically for the project. Data then has been analysed and presented in the fi- nal report. The data collected is stored at the database http://www.phg.org/sys/ad- min/dashboard. Moreover, the database is accessible to all interested stakeholders through web site, http://www.phg.org/welcome/database.

- Implementation, systematization and presentation of a detailed, community-level, gender-sensitive study on access to quality water in 63 vulnerable communities. - Strengthen the responsiveness of Palestinian civil society organizations and their institutions, and their capacity to coordinate with other international actors in the WASH sector, through constant updating of information, establishment of a mecha- nism for actors to coordinate and training in the management of harmonized tools.

The main findings of the project reflect that water accessibility and availability in the 63 com- munities are no better than overall situation in the West Bank and Gaza. 15 communities are totally located in area “C”. Water losses in 37 communities are more than 20%. Water sup- plied to the 55% of the surveyed communities accounts for 100% of their needs during sum- mer period. Moreover, the assessment shows that water service reliability varies from one communitiy to the other. It was realized that water frequency in summer is not sufficient in 27 communities, while 39 communities reported that water pressure in summer is not adequate. Moreover, average (summer/winter) per capita water use varies among the 63 communities. It varies from 34 to 92 litre per capita per day, with 75 weighted average. In the mean time, water price per cubic meter in the network varies from 0.5 - 10 NIS (62% of the surveyed com- munities water price varies from 3 to 5.6 NIS), while water tankers prices varies from 13 to 30 NIS/m3.

2 Executive Summary

The current survey has delineated a section on gender role in water management and use. 5% of the interviewee were females. 14% of the LC members participated in in decision making related to WaSH are females, while 18% of the persons contacting LC for WaSH issues are wow- men. Finally, 7% of water sections staff are women. It was concluded that communities need more interventions to increase water quantity avail- able and improve existing water infrastructure including rehabilitation of existing water net- works and reservoirs as well as improve water supply frequency and reliability and improve- ment of water billing. In addition, raising awareness of communities toward water conservation.

3 Background I: Background

The current report has been prepared under the project titled “Deep preparation and improved response capacity to address the water shortages affecting Palestinian com- munities in the West Bank through increased effectiveness of civil society participa- tion and institutions in the coordination and monitoring of water resources, water and sanitation” funded by Ajuntament de Valancia through Asamblea de Cooperación por la Paz (ACPP) and implemented by Palestinian Hydrology Group (PHG). The main objective of the project is to improve the living conditions of the population of the West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory, which suffers from a chronic water shortage by the improvement of the preparation and response capacity of national and International actors to deal with this crisis. In the mean time, the specific objective is to improve the preparation and response capacity to deal with the water shortage crisis affecting Palestinian communities in the West Bank through a more effective par- ticipation of civil society in the coordination and monitoring of water resources and sanitation. The project specifically aims at: - Reinforce the coordination between the different agents who work in the WASH sector in the Palestinian communities in West Bank. - Drive a harmonized mechanism to lead a study on the access to water for Palestinian communities in the West Bank. - Improve the response capacity of the different actors to achieve a higher impact of the projects. This project is linked to the WaSH Monitoring Program (WaSh MP) that PHG has initiat- ed in June 2002 in response to the urgent need for increased information, resources and action related to the water crisis in Palestine, which resulted from the Israeli re- occupation of major Palestinian cities and towns during the second Intifada. The need for quantitative data to support ongoing advocacy and programming by NGOs working on the implementation of WASH related activities to fulfil the UN General Assembly resolution number GA/10967 which adopted access to clean water and sanitation as a human right, has been a primary force behind the initiation and development of the WaSH MP. The main objective of the WaSH MP is to facilitate timely and effective responses to grave WaSH related problems arising from the Israeli occupation through the collec- tion and dissemination of up-to-date information.The WaSH MP operates with the un- derstanding that the Israeli occupation is at the core cause of the water and sanitation crisis in Palestine. While it is clear that a final solution can only lie in the end of Israeli occupation, the WaSH MP has identified the following goals:

4 Background

• To promote awareness, mobilization, lobbying/advocacy and communica- tion in response to the WaSH crisis in Palestine. • To identify and challenge conditions of the Israeli occupation which directly affects the WaSH situation in Palestine. Since its initiation in 2002, an annual study report is prepared which summarized the WASH status in both West Bank and Gaza and also reported all the information gathered on the communities in a web based data base and made accessible to all stakeholders under the following link: (http://www.phg.org/welcome/database). The current funds by Ayuntamiento de Valencia have enabled us to renew and update the WASH informa- tion to contribute to accurate planning and respond to the water scarcity and crisis in the West Bank. In this respect and to ensure effective dissemination of data and reach wider audience, PHG presents the collected data and produced final report under this project in the above mentioned WASH Monitoring web site.

The current report summarizes the WASH situation in 63 communities as shown in AP- PENDIX-A. It also summarizes the main WASH challenges and problems facing these communities as well as the main WASH needs to overcome these problems for each community.

It is hoped that the information in this report will be used by any and all related organi- zations and institutions in aiding efforts for advocacy and actions that not only demand an end to the occupation, but strive for the implementation of water as a fundamental human right for all.

5 Methodology

II: Methodology

To realize the project objective and to ensure adequate and reliable information gath- ering on the WASH situation in the target communities, PHG has adopted the following methodology:

1. Selecting the Target Communities PHG and ACPP have selected 63 communities at Nablus and Tubas & Northern Valleys Governorates in the West Bank.

2. Creation of a coordination group The coordination group consisting of representatives from Palestinian Water Authority (PWA), ACPP, PHG and WASH cluster have been consulted throughout the project imple- mentation. The main role of the coordination group is to follow up on the progress and to eliminate duplication and ensures integration and harmonization of WASH related information within the central PWA database. Moreover, to assist in disseminating of results to various relevant stakeholders.

3. Data collection tools on water and sanitation Te ensure reliable data collection, a questionnaire has been designed in coordination with PWA and WaSH Cluster members to collect data at community level. At this phase of the study, data was collected using Tablet Data Collection (TDC) instead of paper-based method, where a special web-based software built and designed based on the designed and agreed questionnaire to collect data and field survey using the Tablets. Tablet Data Collection (TDC) helps to improve the quality of data, information, analysis and decision making as well as it has many other advantages over paper-based alternatives such as fewer errors, data consistency, better quality control, faster data collection and analysis. The community digital questionnaire was filled by the project field assistants through interviewing representatives of local councils. PHG project team has made all efforts possible to make a balanced interview between male and female interviewees in the Local Councils. Moreover, the data that has been given by the representatives of village councils (male and female) has been also verified from other informants in the commu- nity sometime clinic or other stakeholders to ensure consisteency. In the mean time, the figures related to water supply were obtained from the bulk water invoices that were obtained from the village council.

6 Methodology

4. Data Base Design Based on the information presented at the questionnaires, a database was designed us- ing web database system. The database is being used for further analysis and linkages.

5. Data processing, analysis and storage into the database Data collected from communities by using TDC was then checked, verified, and then en- tered into special database that was designed specifically for the project. Data then has been analysed and presented in the final report. The data collected is stored at the data- base http://www.phg.org/sys/admin/dashboard. Moreover, the database is accessible to all interested stakeholders through web site, http://www.phg.org/data.

6. Data dissemination and accessibility The main findings of the assessment are disseminated widely through number of means that include: • Website has been redesigned and the database is presented and shared through the Website where all information are made accessible to all relevant stakeholders. • Workshop has been organized to all wash related agencies working in Pales- tine and results of the assessment have been disseminated. • Final annual report has been produced where analysis of the data, the results, the challenges and main community needs have been presented. Hard copies have been made available to all wash agencies and soft copy has been present- ed in the website http://www.phg.org/data.

7 Availability &Accessebility

III: Availability and Accessibility to Water and Sanitation in Palestine 1. Water Resources: The magnitude of groundwater resources in the West Bank is nearly 672 MCM distrib- uted in three major groundwater basins in the West Bank, Western, North-eastern and Eastern Basins with replenishment capacities of 362 MCM, 145 MCM and 172 MCM / year respectively. In addition, there is only one groundwater basin in Gaza, the coastal aquifer basin with replenishment capacity of 55 – 60 MCM per year. Surface water, represented mainly by the Jordan River, is not yet accessible to the Pales- tinians and its water is used completely by Israel. In addition to that, water from non-conventional sources can also be considered as im- portant sources, including wastewater, surface runoff and desalinating sea and brackish water. The estimated magnitude of surface runoff component is varying in accordance with rainfall quantity, duration and intensity. In addition, most of the collected waste- water is either fully or partially treated. However, very limited part of the treated waste- water is reused. The non-conventional water resources can be summarized in Table 1.

Quantity Type of Source Comment (MCM/Year)

165 MCM in West Bank and 20 MCM Surface Runoff 185 in Gaza Wadis, (PWA 2012)

30 MCM in West Bank and 41 MCM in Wastewater 71 Gaza, (PWA 2012) Desalinated water plants owned by private sector, suplied people with Desalination 4.1 bottled desalinated drinking water (PCBS 2018) Table (1): The non-conventional water resources, Source PWA and PCBS.

Despite this good potential of available none conventional water resources, it is unfor- tunately very little percentage that it is tapped. Other than the desalinated water, only very small percentage of surface runoff is being collected in Auja Dam in West Bank while more than 95% of the collected effluent is not reused even the advanced treated part resulted from the Nablus West treatment plant.

8 Availability &Accessebility

Water availability and access to Palestinian citizens in both West Bank and Gaza remains highly restricted and controlled by Israel. Israel’s current water policies do in fact dis- criminate against Palestinians through several de facto policies, the most obvious of which, manifested though the deprivation of Palestinian from receiving their legal share of trans-boundary water resources.

2. Water Supply Quantity and Service Coverage The magnitude of groundwater resources in the West Bank is nearly 672 MCM distrib- uted in three major groundwater basins in the West Bank, Western, North-eastern and Eastern Basins with replenishment capacities of 362 MCM, 145 MCM and 172 MCM / year respectively. In addition, there is only one groundwater basin in Gaza, the coastal aquifer basin with replenishment capacity of 55 – 60 MCM per year. Comparing the Palestinian total water abstraction from their local resources to the fig- ure that was agreed on under the Oslo interim agreement, it can be realized that, Pales- tinians water abstraction dropped from 118 MCM in 1994 to 104 MCM in 2012 with total reduction of 14 MCM. Such reduction is resulted from the imposed Israeli restrictions on the rehabilitation of existing, and development of new, water resources as well as from the confiscation of local Palestinian water sources by the Israeli separation wall. The cumulative effect of this policy have reduced Palestinian water security and increased their reliance on purchased water quantities from the Israeli water company. Latest fig- ures reported by PWA (2013)1 indicates that 60% of the total Palestinian domestic wa- ter use in the West Bank is purchased from Israel. This means that 60% of the domestic water supply in the West Bank is subject to the Israeli merit as to when to supply, where and at what cost.

In the mean time, there are over 50 Israeli water wells inside the West Bank, mainly located in the eastern aquifer, producing nearly 54 MCM/Year, 15% of which is sold to Palestinian communities while the rest is allocated to illegal settlements.2

It is estimated that 98% of the Palestinian communities in the West Bank are connect- ed to water supply networks. However, network coverage is not fully in most of these communities where 64 communities of those connected have 80% or less coverage. In the meantime, 7 communities are not served at all with total population of 7500 people, PWA (2019). The Situation in the Gaza Strip is different where most of the water supply available from the coastal aquifer is of low quality and not suitable for human use. It is reported that 97% of the water abstracted from the aquifer is of poor quality. The deterioration

1 Annual Water Resources Status Report as on 2012, October 2013 2 Policies of denial p. 15 9 Availability &Accessebility of the aquifers water quality has been caused by the long term overexploitation which triggered saline water intrusion as well as pollution by various pollution sources includ- ing poorly treated effluent as well as agrichemicals. All in all, total domestic water use in Gaza is estimated at 95 MCM, of which 4 MCM is secured from desalination, 12 MCM is purchased from Israeli company and the rest is abstracted from the aquifer where most of it is brackish, PWA (2018).

Limitation imposed on the supply have influenced per capita water use to nearly 90 l/d in the West Bank and nearly 83 l/d in Gaza, mostly poor quality, PWA (2019).

3. Wastewater Situation Wastewater collection and treatment varies substantially across West Bank and Gaza. Most of the rural areas are unserved with wastewater collection and treatment while the urban areas are partially served. In the mean time most of Gaza is served with wastewater collection systems. Figure 1 shows the service coverage in both West Bank and Gaza.

Figure1: Service coverage in both West Bank and Gaza

The total volume of collected wastewater through collection system is nearly 41 MCM in Gaza and 30 MCM in the West Bank. Most of the collected wastewater in Gaza is being treated either fully or partially and mostly discharged to the sea. In the mean time the collected effluent in the West Bank from major Palestinian towns and cities is either fully or partially treated and flows either east or westward. Figure 2 shows the volume of treated effluent the flows west and east and its treatment condition.

10 Availability &Accessebility

Figure 2: Volume of treated effluent that flows west and east and its treatment condition

It is important to indicate here that most of the treated effluent is unfortunately not reused and flows either eastward or westward. It mixes with untreated effluent from other Palestinian towns and also generated from Israeli Settlements where it is captured, treated and reused in Israel while the cost of treatment is deducted from the Palestinian national budget. Total wastewater treatment bill that was charged to Palestinian national budget in 2015 was 83 Million Shekel (roughly 22 Million $) while this amount was 2 Million Shekel in the year 2000. 4. Water Governance Following to the decision of government to undertake water sector reform back in 2010, the reform process was effectively started by appointing an independent team to lead the process and creating the proper legal environment to ensure that the process and its outcome are based on solid legal ground. The first step was to reform the existing water law No.3 and replace it with a new presidential decree, to issue the Water Law No.4 for the year 2014 by virtue of which new bodies have been created and the responsibilities of existing bodies have been modified. The new Water Law stipulates establishing regional water utilities for water and wastewater as legal and financially independent entities:

Palestinian Water Authority (PWA): Ministerial role to ensure better handling of the planning and development policies of the water sector. Water Sector Regulatory Council (WSRC): Monitoring the performance of water services providers and approving water prices and water tariff to ensure that service is provided according to standards. Water Service Providers (WSPs) of municipalities, regional utilities, and the National Water Company (NWC): Water supply to the customers.

11 Availability &Accessebility

The two charts below show the institutional frameworks of the water sector according to the new Water Law (2014).

12 Major Findings of the WASH

63 IV: Major Findings of the WASH Situation in the Communities & Proposed Response

1. Introduction The study has targeted 63 communities as stated earlier and assessed both water and sanitation conditions as well as defined the main challenges and needs in these commu- nities. The main issues covered by the assessment includes, water supply quantity and quality, water supply sources, service coverage, losses, per capita water use and water price. In addition, it covers the water needs as well as the current sanitation and hygiene situa- tion in the 63 communities, it defines the challenges they are facing and proposes some responses to overcome these challenges. The following sections will elaborate on these main findings.

2. Water Supply Quantity and Quality It was realized that total water quantity supplied to the target communities is below their actual needs as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Supplied versus demand water quantities In addition, water supply and needs vary from one community to the other depending on the type of community, population number but more importantly, to the quantities supplied to the communitiy from the source, figure 4.

13 Major Findings of the WASH

Figure 4: Water Supply and demand of each community

In general, the supplied water quality is good with nearly 75% of surveyed communities demand in summer period.

3. Water Service Condition and Reliability The assessment has shown that water supply frequency to the communities vary from 3 day per month as is the case in Qabalan to neraly 30 days per month. 40% of communi- ties reported that they recieve water between 3-10 days per month as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Monthly Water Supply Frequency

14 Major Findings of the WASH

Moreover, water pressure in the water supply network is not adequate during summer period where 66% of the communities indicated that water pressure is not adequate and nearly 44% indicated that water pressure is not adequate in both summer and win- ter as shown in figure 6.

Figure 6: Water Pressure in the Network

Water price supplied by netwrok is also varies from 0.5 NIS/m3 in Bardala to 10 NIS/m3 in Ibziq with average price of 5 NIS / m3 while tanker water price varies from 13 NIS in Beit Dajan to 30 NIS in Beita with average price of 18.5 NIS / m3 as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Comparing water price from network versus tankers

15 Major Findings of the WASH

In addition, per capita water use also vary substantially among the surveyed communi- ties. It vary from 33 to 92 litre per capita per day as shown in Figure 8. In the meantime, the wieghted average per capita water use is 75 l/c/d

Figure 8: Per capita daily water use

Water losses also vary from 66 % in Kafr Qallil to 10 % in Ibziq with average 30% as shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9: Water Losses

16 Major Findings of the WASH

Access to water resources varies from bad to good depends on the location of the water source. Nearly 17% of the communities surveyed indicated that access to water sources is bad because either the water source is close to pollution source such as wastewater, cesspits or the community is surrounded by settlements while nearly 48% indicated that access is acceptable. In the meantime, nearly 56% indicated bad access to sanita- tion and 21% indicated good access as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10: Access to Water and Sanitation 4. Wastewater and Solidwaste Serivce Conditions It was realized that connection to wastewater networks varies; some communities are fully connected with wastewater network such as in Nablus Govrnorate while other com- munities still not connected and rly on cesspits such as in Tubas Governarete, in average 20% of the surveyed communities are fully or partially connected to wastewater net- works. In terms of population, almost 24% of the surveyed population are served with wastewater network while 76% are relying on cesspits as shown in figure 11.

Figure 11: Wastewater Network Coverage 17 Major Findings of the WASH

In addition, 56% of surveyed communites indicated that they dispose their solid waste at managed landfill while 22% indicated that they use unmanaged dumpsites and 22% using random sites as shown in figure 12.

Figure 12: Solidwaste Disposal

5. Gender and Water It was realized that gender representation in the water and sanitation realted aspects in the surveyed communities are moderate to low. The results obtained shows that nearly 14% of Female members of local council committees participates in decision making related to water and sanitation. In the same time, female staff working in water and wastewater sections in the local councils accounts for only 7% of total staff number. It was however, realized that 18% of the contacts and complains received by local coun- cils are coming from women in these areas as shown in figure 13.

Figure 13: Gender Representation in WaSH

18 Major Findings of the WASH 6. Major WASH Needs It was concluded that communities need more interventions to increase water quanti- ty available and improve existing water infrastructure including construct more water networks and reservoirs as well as reduce leakage and improve water billing. In addi- tion, improving the water quality through better chlorination and stop pollution sources. Construct more cisterns and more storage facilities was also among the list of needs as well as constructing wastewater collection and treatment systems. More details are presented in Tables below: 1- Nablus Governorate communities:

Affected communi- Needs Problems Problem details ties (Proposed Actions)

21 communities with Low LCD LCD less than 70. - Increasing water shares The productivity of groundwater Rujeib well, Beit Iba or developing new water wells supplying drinking water well and Al Masou’di- sources. networks is insufficient. ya well - Regular monitoring of (Al Lubban ash Shar- water production and dis- Shared water supply points are qiya and A’mmuriya), tribution from groundwater not enough to meet the water (‘Einabus, Odala, and wells. needs of the population. Hiwwara), (Madama, ‘Urif, Asira al Qibliya - Regular monitoring of and Burin) 1- Water Sup- shared water supply points. ply Shortage (Rujeib, Beit Dajen, - Enhancing local author- in Summer A’mmuriya, Nisf Jubeil, ities in managing water Low water pressure in water and Balata Camp) prices, water lines and networks have low pressure all quality of water purchased the year and other 19 from agricultural wells. communities have low pressure in summer. - Construction and rehabili- tation of water cisterns and More water quantities are need- water harvesting at large ed for industry, tourism, and Beit Iba, Beita, Sabas- scale. agriculture tiya High costs of purchased water tankers for Drinking use, others Qabalan, Rujeib, Beit for Animal raising or industry or Iba, Beit Dajen, Tell, farming Iraq Burin, Khirbet Tana

19 Major Findings of the WASH Deir al Hatab, Beit Iba, - Rehabilitation and expan- Madama, Zawata, As sion of water networks. Water networks losses and Sawiya, Burqa, Rujeib, aging Einabus, Beita, Hiw- - Water meters for main wara, Odala, A’sira ash supply points and uncon- Shamaliya, Nablus nected houses. Upper area of Balata - Capacity building for wa- Camp, Asker al Qadim ter technicians and water 2- Bad Low pressure in water networks Camp, Deir al Hatab, joint councils. Condition Qaryut, parts of Beit of Water Dajen Network - Maintenance tools for the Deir al Hatab, Beit Iba, water networks and leacks Water networks technical issues Zawata, and Balata detection tools. and maintenance issues Camp - Awareness programs. No water meters Kafr Qallil - Rehabilitation of house- hold’s water meters. Illicit water connections -

Balata, A’sker Qadin, A’sker Jadeed, E’in beit The absence of a central water Alma Camps in Nab- tanks or it’s not operating lus city. Zawata, Beit Wazen, Qusin, Deir al Hatab,Odala, Za’tara (Qarut, Jalud, Khirbet New reservoirs with suit- Srra with other three able capacities allocated in 3- water A shared water reservoir serving locations), (Madama, a convenient place storage several communities ‘Urif, with another two capacity locations), (Einabus with part of Hiwwara) Rujeib, Beit Dajen, Be- Small reservoir, or some neigh- ita, Nisf Jbeil, Ijnisinya, borhoods are not served Sabastiya, A’mmuriya No water network, the citizens New cisterns, plastic and use cisterns for drinking and for Khibet Tana 3 animal raising metal tanks 3-5m capacity Possible pollution resulting from the leakage of sewage Rehabilitation water net- from waste cesspits or sewage Balata Camp, Sabastiya works and wastewater net- networks into the old water (the old town) works, new ww networks networks Water springs use through water network without chlorina- Ijnisinya Chlorination unit for water tion treatment springs Water purchased from agricul- tural wells must have chlorine Beit Dajen, Beit Forik, Chlorination unit for Ag- 4- Water disinfection and A’sira ash Shamali- ricultural wells which are Quality providing water to drinking ya water networks Most of water springs in the sur- veyed communitis are polluted - Removing pollution from wastewater leakage either sources from cesspits or ww network No water quality control for rain - Awareness programs for water in cisterns people No water quality control for water tankers

20 Major Findings of the WASH

The four refugee camps in Nablus city, Low rate collection of water Deir al Hatab, Kaf- - Rehabilitation of house- bills in some communities er Qalil, Beit Dajen, hold’s water meters. 5- Payment Burqa, Sarra, A’sira ash Shamaliya - Awareness programs for and collec- people tion of water No water meters for houses in Bills some communities Kafr Qallil Poor maintenance for water network, and limited capability Most surveyed commu- for water NW expansion nities Not enough technical staff for water services within the village Most surveyed commu- councils, including losses main- nities - Increasing of technical tenance, water meter readings staff for water service with- supply and consumption. in the village councils. Lack of necessary maintenance tools for the water networks Most village councils - Capacity building for and losses detection. technicians and water joint Some councils still do not have councils. a computerize system to track Nisf Jbeil, Zatara, kafer - Enhancing computerize the water network information Qalil, Beit wazen, Deir water system use and (quantities of water supply, al Hatab providing training for staff 6- Following consumption and losses), or to access water service up Water documentation system. information, and upgrade Services Maintenance happened only in the existing ones to better case of pipes breakdowns and Most surveyed commu- follow up for water net- upon complaints and its not nities works information. documented clearly. There are no as built plans for - Enhancing documentation old water networks and new Most surveyed commu- system use and providing expansions happened without nities training for staff. planning. - Formation of more water No records of water quantities Sabastya, Burqa, Ijnis- Joint councils. supplyed from springs to water inya, yanun network. Irregular readings for household Most surveyed commu- water meters nities

21 Major Findings of the WASH

Most surveyed commu- No sewage system nities Eastern part of Nablus city and three refugee - New sewage systems Communities with sewage sys- camps, partially Rujeib, collection, Expansion and tem without WWTP Kafer Qalil, Beit Dajen, rehabilitation with WWTP. Qusin and Sarra - Finding suitable places for Western part of Nablus ww disposal from vacuum Some communities have sewage city and one refugee tankers system, with WWTP camp, partially Beit Wazen, Deir Sharef, - Rehabilitation of springs, Beit Iba, Zawata and restore Archaeological A lot of springs in the buildings. surveyed area about a Springs in some communities half are contaminated - Removing pollution are contaminated by sewage Tell Beit Iba Burqa Ba- sources specially from leakage from cesspits zarya Nisf Jbail A’warta settlements Jalood Qabalan… - Capacity building for Water quality in water networks workers in this sector, and is affected by wastewater leak- Balata Camp, Sabastiya vacuum tankers 7- Wastewa- age to the pipes in old water (old town) ter Disposal networks or from cesspits - Awareness programs for people Archaeological buildings under houses are affected by sewage Sabastiya (the old leakage from cesspits town) Waste water disposal from set- Qusin, Qaryut, Jalud, tlements and ‘Urif New projects to enhance resuse of treated wastewa- No reuse for the reclaimed wa- Ijnisinya, Sarra, Deir ter with Awareness pro- ter from treatment plants Sharaf grams Capacity building and tech- nical program Animal raising and Industrial waste water disposal (Stone cutting facilities, Olive mills, Tahina, Jeans washing, Slaugh- Nablus city and in the Providing pretreatment ter house and shops, Aluminum eastern and western plants and Pains, led, diary, medicine communities around it factories, restaurants and sweet shops, and chicken shops) Solid Waste collection by Joint Services Council 1 – 3 times per Most surveyed commu- week nities Irregular collection, not enough - Solid waste recycling workers, not enough trash bins projects (Composting, Pow- and collection vehicle malfunc- 15 Communities er generation, …) tioning and maintenance - Improving solid waste 8- Solid Disposal of Solid waste in 14 Communities collection service by sup- Waste Dis- dumpsites and burning porting SW Joint council posal A’muriya, Yanun, Khir- technically and physically No Solid Waste collection ser- bet Sarra and Khirbet vice Tana - SW Trucks different sizes No collection for solid waste Zawata, Tell - SW containers different from farms raising animals sizes No Collection for Agricultural Solid waste, or Demolition and construction waste

22 Major Findings of the WASH

Female local council members do not participate in decision making in some locations Women contacting local coun- cils for issues related to WaSH is Gender mainstreaming weak to moderate Most surveyed commu- 9- Gender nities training and awareness Some village councils do not programs. have any female staff Most female staff position in local councils are secretary or accountant not technicians Some water Springs’ are sup- plying domestic water network Sabastiya An Naqura, without recording of quantities Burqa, Ijnisinya, Yanun supplied - Rehabilitation of water springs A lot of springs in the surveyed Iraq Burin, Beit Iba, Ja- communities needs rehabilita- lud, Madama, Qabalan, - Providing Chlorination Khirbet Tana, Sabasti- units 10- Springs tion ya, Burqa Some springs are contaminated - Bulk Water Meters by waste water leakage from Tell, A’warta, Bazariya, cesspits and WW networks Nisf Jbeil - Removing pollution sources Springs have a good quality but they need chlorination units, Zawata, Yanun , Ijnisin- pumps and balancing tanks… ya, Burqa Overcrowding in schools Odala - Construction Asira Ash Shamaliya, new schools Schools sanitary units problems khirbet Tana female - Rehabilita- school, As Sawiya fe- tion School sanitary male school, 11- Schools’ units Environment khirbet Tana female - Providing and health Water storage tanks insufficient school roof water tanks - Schools Bazariya males high rehabilitation Class rooms rehabilitation school - Rehabilita- tion of recreation Schools recreation areas suit- Sabastiya female areas of school ability school

23 Major Findings of the WASH

Some communities partially have residences in area C, and B Yanun, Qabalan, U’rif, which make serving citizens is Einabus difficult Totally prevention of develop- Zatara, Khirbet Sarra, ment, construction or services Khirbet Tana Deir Sharaef, Einabus, Water pipe line and sewage Asira Ash Shamaliya system main line is located in (Approval to make area C sewage main line) Settler Attacks on springs and Deir Sharaf, Yanun, water utilities KhirbetTana 12- Occupa- tion Obsta- Supply water points from Me- cles korot are not controlled by local councils Asira Ash Shamaliya, Demolition of houses A’warta Iraq Burin, Qarut , Ja- Demolition orders in Area C lud, A’warta Waste water and Solid waste disposal from settlements Qusin, Qarut, Jalud, Restrictions on solid waste ve- hicles and wastewater vaccum Rujeib, U’rif trucks by Israelis. Attacks on schools Einabus

24 Major Findings of the WASH 2- Tubas Governorate communities:

Problems Problem details Affected communities Needs (Proposed Actions) 1-Water No Water networks Al Malih, Al Farisiya, - Plastic or metallic tanks 5m3 Shortage Khirbet Tell el Himma, Al capacity Hadidiya, Kashda Low LCD Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar, Al - Mobile latrines Hadidiya, Salhab, Al Malih, High costs of water tankers Al Farisiya, Khirbet Tell el - Water distribution Himma - Close filling points for tank- No water tanks in houses ers or tents no bathrooms or kitchens - Increase water supply and Some locations partially Froush Beit Dajen shares from water supply depend on water tankers points 2-Bad Condi- Al A’qrabaniya, El Fara’a - Rehabilitation and expan- tion of Water Water networks losses and Camp, An Nassariya, Wadi sion of water networks. Network aging al Fara’a, Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar, Talluza - Water meters for supply Agricultural water net- Furush Beit Dajan, ‘Ein el water sources and uncon- works totally or partially Beida Kardala and Bardala nected houses. with no water meters - Capacity building for water Illicit water connections technicians. - Maintenance tools for the water networks, and leaks detection - Awareness programs for people - Rehabilitation of water meters. 3- Water stor- The absence of a central ‘Ein el Beida, Kardala, Al New reservoirs with suitable age capacity water tanks or it’s not op- A’qaba, Khirbet Yarza, Kh- capacities allocated in a con- erating irbet ar Ras al Ahmar venient place Bardala, An Nassariya, Al Small reservoir, or some A’qrabaniya, Al Badhan, neighborhoods are not Talluza, Yasid, Wadi al served Fara’a, No water network, the Al Malih, Al Farisiya, New cisterns, plastic and citizens use cisterns for Khirbet Tell el Himma, Al metal tanks 3-5m3 capacity drinking and for animal Hadidiya raising 4- Payment - Al Badhan, Talluza - Rehabilitation of water and collec- Low rate collection of meters. tion of water water bills in some com- - An Nassariya, El Fara’a Bills munities Camp, - Awareness programs for Yasid, Al A’qrabaniya people ‘Ein el Beida, Furush Beit No water meters for hous- Dajan, Kardala es in some communities

25 Major Findings of the WASH

5-Occupation Demolition of water pipe- Al Hadidiya - New water cis- Obstacles lines terns Demolition of water res- Yarza, Al Maleh - Water tanks ervoir supplying water to (plastic or metal- communities lic) 5m3 Capacity Confiscation of water tank- Al Malih, Al Farisiya, Ibziq, ers and tractors Ras al Ahmer, and Al Had- idiya Demolitions houses, tents, water tanks, and latrines 6- Pollution Wastewater disposal from Al Badan, An Nassariya, Al - Removing pollu- from waste Nablus city eastern part A’qrabaniya, Furush Beit tion sources water Dajan Land and plants contami- - New water sourc- nation by wastewater es for agricultural Reuse of wastewater by use farmers

26 APPENDIX-A

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX – A: Surveyed Communities

APPENDIX – B: Questionnaire

APPENDIX – C: Tables and Maps

27 APPENDIX-A

APPENDIX–A: Surveyed Communities

SN ID Community name Governorate Population (2019)

1 150990 Tell Nablus 5317 2 50656 Khirbet Yarza Tubas & Northern Valleys 48 3 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qadeem) Nablus 6734 4 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) Nablus 4911 5 150920 Nablus Nablus 161630 6 150960 Balata Camp Nablus 15076 7 150950 Sarra Nablus 3486 8 150975 ‘Iraq Burin Nablus 1038 9 150860 Beit Iba Nablus 4202 10 150835 Zawata Nablus 2613 11 50580 Al Malih Tubas & Northern Valleys 367 12 151025 Kafr Qallil Nablus 3120 13 150810 Deir Sharaf Nablus 3038 14 151010 Rujeib Nablus 6144 15 150880 ‘Ein Beit el Ma Camp Nablus 3696 16 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar Tubas & Northern Valleys 214 17 150875 Beit Wazan Nablus 1351 18 150855 Qusin Nablus 2319 19 150825 An Nassariya Nablus 1946 20 151030 Furush Beit Dajan Nablus 745 21 150935 Deir al Hatab Nablus 2923 22 151215 Beita Nablus 12034 23 50551 Al Farisiya Tubas & Northern Valleys 125 24 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma Tubas & Northern Valleys 135 25 50871 Al Hadidiya Tubas & Northern Valleys 110 26 150840 Al A’qrabaniya Nablus 1200 27 150805 Al Badhan Nablus 3450 28 151185 Huwwara Nablus 6859 29 151410 Qaryut Nablus 2637 30 151420 Jalud Nablus 765 31 151450 Khirbet Sarra Nablus 32 32 150775 Talluza Nablus 3400 33 151050 Madama Nablus 2155 34 50490 Ibziq Tubas & Northern Valleys 187 35 50525 Salhab Tubas & Northern Valleys 45 36 151160 ‘Urif Nablus 3732 37 151000 Beit Dajan Nablus 4594 38 151335 Qabalan Nablus 8442

28 APPENDIX-A

39 50740 Wadi al Fara’a Tubas & Northern Valleys 4350 40 150695 Yasid Nablus 2550 41 151180 Odala Nablus 1613 42 151135 A’warta Nablus 7266 43 50650 Kashda Tubas & Northern Valleys 65 44 151285 Za’tara Nablus 71 45 151176 Khirbet Tana Nablus 19 46 151195 ‘Einabus Nablus 2978 47 50450 ‘Ein el Beida Tubas & Northern Valleys 1200 48 151200 Yanun Nablus 89 49 151380 As Sawiya Nablus 2844 50 151435 A’mmuriya Nablus 382 51 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya Nablus 2719 52 150765 Sabastiya Nablus 3301 53 150680 Burqa Nablus 4277 54 150770 Ijnisinya Nablus 603 55 150660 Bazzariya Nablus 2878 56 150785 An Naqura Nablus 1840 57 50700 El Fara’a Camp Tubas & Northern Valleys 7800 58 50560 Al A’qaba Tubas & Northern Valleys 350 59 50670 Ras al Far’a Tubas & Northern Valleys 1450 60 50455 Kardala Tubas & Northern Valleys 220 61 50420 Bardala Tubas & Northern Valleys 2400 62 150745 Nisf Jubeil Nablus 485 63 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya Nablus 9078

- The number of surveyed communities is 63 (47 in Nablus and 16 in Tubas) - The Population sum of the surveyed communities is 341,648

29 APPENDIX-A

30 APPENDIX-B

APPENDIX–B: Questionnaire

31 APPENDIX-B

32 APPENDIX-B

33 APPENDIX-C

APPENDIX–C: Tables and Maps Communities located in area “C” or 30% of Residents or more are living in Area “C”

Residents in Area C SN ID Community name Population (2019) (%) 1 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 100 2 50580 Al Malih 367 100 3 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 38 4 151010 Rujeib 6144 35 5 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 100 6 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 100 7 50551 Al Farisiya 125 100 8 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 100 9 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 100 10 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 100 11 50490 Ibziq 187 100 12 151285 Za’tara 71 100 13 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 100 14 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 100 15 151200 Yanun 89 38 16 151380 As Sawiya 2844 33 17 50560 Al A’qaba 350 100 18 50455 Kardala 220 100 19 50420 Bardala 2400 100

15 communities of the surveyed ones are totally located in area “C”

34 APPENDIX-C

35 APPENDIX-C

Communities without Wastewater Networks

Popu- WW net- Open WW Cesspits cov- SN ID Community name lation work cov- coverage erage (%) (2019) erage (%) (%)

1 150990 Tell 5317 0 100 0

2 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 0 0 100

3 150975 ‘Iraq Burin 1038 0 100 0

4 50580 Al Malih 367 0 0 100

5 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ah- 214 0 0 100 mar

6 150825 An Nassariya 1946 0 100 0

7 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 0 100 0

8 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 0 100 0

9 151215 Beita 12034 0 100 0

10 50551 Al Farisiya 125 0 0 100

11 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 0 10 90

12 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 0 0 100

13 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 0 100 0

14 150805 Al Badhan 3450 0 100 0

15 151185 Huwwara 6859 0 100 0

16 151410 Qaryut 2637 0 100 0

17 151420 Jalud 765 0 100 100

18 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 0 100 0 19 150775 Talluza 3400 0 100 0

36 APPENDIX-C

20 151050 Madama 2155 0 100 0

21 50490 Ibziq 187 0 0 100

22 50525 Salhab 45 0 80 20

23 151160 ‘Urif 3732 0 100 0

24 151335 Qabalan 8442 0 100 0

25 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 0 100 0

26 150695 Yasid 2550 0 100 0

27 151180 Odala 1613 0 100 0

28 151135 A’warta 7266 0 100 0

29 50650 Kashda 65 0 100 0

30 151285 Za’tara 71 0 100 0

31 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 0 30 70

32 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 0 100 0

33 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 0 100 0

34 151200 Yanun 89 0 100 0

35 151380 As Sawiya 2844 0 100 0

36 151435 A’mmuriya 382 0 100 0

37 151405 Al Lubban ash Shar- 2719 0 100 0 qiya

38 150765 Sabastiya 3301 0 100 0

39 150680 Burqa 4277 0 100 0

40 150770 Ijnisinya 603 0 100 0

41 150660 Bazzariya 2878 0 100 0

37 APPENDIX-C

42 150785 An Naqura 1840 0 100 0

43 50560 Al A’qaba 350 0 100 0

44 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 0 100 0

45 50455 Kardala 220 0 100 0

46 50420 Bardala 2400 0 100 0

47 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 0 100 0

48 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 0 100 0

48 Communities of the surveyed ones are without wastewater networks 4 Communities of the surveyed ones are (20%-80%) wastewater network coverage 7 Communities of the surveyed ones are > 80% wastewater network coverage 4 Communities of the surveyed ones are with 100% wastewater network coverage

38 APPENDIX-C

39 APPENDIX-C

Solid Waste Collection ≤ 90%

Population Solid waste collec- Solid waste SN ID Community name (2019) tion coverage (%) method 1 150990 Tell 5317 90 Landfill Site 2 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 0 Random Site 3 150860 Beit Iba 4202 100 Landfill Site 4 50580 Al Malih 367 100 Random Site 5 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al 214 99 Random Site Ahmar 6 150855 Qusin 2319 100 Landfill Site 7 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 100 Random Site 8 50551 Al Farisiya 125 100 Random Site 9 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 90 Random Site 10 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 95 Random Site 11 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 0 Landfill Site 12 150805 Al Badhan 3450 100 Landfill Site 13 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 98 Random Site 14 150775 Talluza 3400 97 Landfill Site 15 50490 Ibziq 187 100 Random Site 16 50525 Salhab 45 0 Random Site 17 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 99 Landfill Site 18 50650 Kashda 65 90 Random Site 19 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 100 Random Site 20 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 0 Landfill Site 21 151200 Yanun 89 98 Random Site 22 151435 A’mmuriya 382 100 Random Site 23 150765 Sabastiya 3301 0 Landfill Site 24 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 0 Landfill Site 25 50560 Al A’qaba 350 0 Landfill Site 26 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 90 Landfill Site 27 50455 Kardala 220 80 Landfill Site

7 communities of the surveyed ones are without solid waste collection coverage

40 APPENDIX-C

41 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Pollution Sources

Popu- SN ID Communi- lation Pollution sources ty name (2019) 1 150990 Tell 5317 - Animal raising in or near houses caus- es bad odors and insects

2 150920 Nablus 161630 - Sewage in the eastern region of the city that flows towards the villages across the valley and polluting the springs of Wadi Al-Bathan and continues to the central Jordan Valley - There are a number of factories in the western and eastern regions of the city of Nablus that produce untreated industri- al wastewater. Currently, this wastewater is prevented from entering the sewage network in the western region and the municipality through its various departments provides secure primary treatment units for factories to treat Industrial wastewater as a prelude to the introduction of treated water for the wastewater treatment unit in the western side or the re-use of this water in the same facto- ry after the initial treatment, and from these factories are a number of saws, stone and crushers, and tahini factories. 3 150960 Balata 15076 - The sewage network is in bad con- Camp dition as well as the water network in some areas of the camp. A mixing occurred between them at the end of 2018 and the situation lasted until 2/2019. The problem was solved by changing some pipes for the two networks in cooperation with the camp committee, UNRWA, Nablus municipality and the Nablus health directorate. 4 150860 Beit Iba 4202 - Continuous malfunctioning of solid waste vehicle and expensive maintenance, which is causing waste accumulation around houses resulting bad odors, spread of insects and wild dogs and pigs. - Wastewater flow from Beit Wazan the adjacent village and from cow farms from Zawata resulting bad odors and insects. - Industrial wastewater flows to Beit Iba wadi without treatment. - Dust and noise pollution due to con- crete factories, Crushers and stone cutting factories (24 factory).

42 APPENDIX-C

5 150835 Zawata 2613 - Around 41 farms in the village are raising animals (cow’s sheep and poultry) and they are flushing the farm’s animal waste by water from unlicensed shallow groundwater wells, which flow to empty land in Zawata and other neighborhood locations. Solid waste collection service in the location is very bad not regular and labors are not qualified. A veterinary medicine company gets rid of its solid waste with household solid waste in location. 6 150810 Deir Sharaf 3038 - Dust and noise problems because of crushers and quarries in the village and the bordered village of Beit Iba. - Wastewater problems in the village Wadi, WW comes from cow farms and ad- jacent villages causing bad odors spread of insects, wild pigs and dogs. 7 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 - Air pollution because of Aluminum factory emissions in Beit Iba. 8 150855 Qusin 2319 - Dust pollution resulting from stone crushers in Beit Iba village as well as the industrial waste and smoke flows toward the village from the western Settlements. 9 150825 An Nassari- 1946 - Nablus city wastewater is flow and ya pass An Nassariya wadi resulting in agricultur- al water, farms and animals in addition to skin diseases. 10 151030 Furush Beit 745 - Nablus wastewater flows towards the Dajan village. 11 150935 Deir al 2923 - Wastewater disposal from the Eastern Hatab part of Nablus city and villages around in a valley near the location. Solid waste disposal and burning in a random dumpsite from Beit forik location. 12 151215 Beita 12034 - Crushers and saws in the industrial zone and other areas near the house com- plaints about noise and dust and there is no monitoring on how to dispose of industrial wastewater and the resulting solid violations. 13 150840 Al A’qra- 1200 - Nablus City wastewater is passing baniya through the village. 14 150805 Al Badhan 3450 - Nablus City wastewater is flowing towards the village and resulting in natural spring’s pollution. 15 151410 Qaryut 2637 - Waste water disposal from I’ylai Set- tlement to Agricultural lands in the western part of location

43 APPENDIX-C

16 151420 Jalud 765 - Wastewater disposal from three set- tlements around the location to agricultural lands in Jalud. Solid waste collection service is not regular, solid waste accumulated in the location caus- ing odors, insects... 17 151450 Khirbet 32 - Wastewater disposal from three set- Sarra tlements around the location to agricultural lands in Jalud and Khirbet Sara is a part of it. No Solid waste collection service, solid waste accumulated in the location causing odors, insects... 18 150775 Talluza 3400 - Waste cesspits are leaking to streets. - There is a furniture factory; excess wood is burned inside the community. 19 151050 Madama 2155 - Wastewater from Cesspits always leaks into roads and neighborhood, and vacuum tankers empty their load in agricultural land around the location. 20 151160 ‘Urif 3732 - Wastewater disposal from settlement near the community in Agricultural lands. - ‘Urif dumpsite which used by Bu- rin And Madama locations, the land of this dumpsite was rented to Burin village council by the owner solid waste are always burned (photos are attached in this questionnaire). Waste water from Cesspits always floods in roads and neighborhood, and vacuum tankers empty their load in agricultural land around the location. 21 50740 Wadi al 4350 - Wastewater flow from Al Fara’a Camp Fara’a in mixing with Al Fara’a water spring. 22 151180 Odala 1613 - Wastewater leakage from cesspits and Wastewater disposal by vacuum tankers. 23 151135 A’warta 7266 - Wastewater leakage from cesspits from houses, and wastewater disposal by vac- uum tanks around the location, a local spring was contaminated. 24 151380 As Sawiya 2844 - The Residents living near the solid waste dumpsite are newly started complain- ing of it. 25 150765 Sabastiya 3301 - Wastewater leakage from cesspits to archaeological buildings under houses, espe- cially in the crowded old town area 40% of Sabastiya housing. - Animal Solid waste from farms (no solid waste collection service).

44 APPENDIX-C

26 150660 Bazzariya 2878 - A crusher belonging to an Israeli com- pany using explosives, which caused a crack in the male secondary school of Bazzariya which is 200 meters away from it, as well as some of the houses on the village, in addition to dust and noise. - Contamination and pollution of the vil- lage water spring by waste leaks from house- hold cesspits. 27 150785 An Naqura 1840 - Wastewater leakage from cesspits. 28 50700 El Fara’a 7800 - Wastewater from the Camp flows Camp inside pipes towards the wadi and collected behind the dam. 29 150990 Nisf Jubeil 485 - Wastewater leakage from cesspits which polluted four local springs in the loca- tion, (two of them are still used for drinking used through the water network less contam- inated depending on the water tests of the Directorate of Environmental Health). 30 150920 A’sira ash 9078 - No Wastewater network: leakage Shamaliya from cesspits contaminated all the rainwater cisterns in the crowded old town in the lo- cation. Vacuum tankers are disposing of the wastewater in Wadi Al-Hamam, which goes to Al-Bathan springs. - The solid waste dumpsite in the loca- tion (burning then buried). - Industrial wastewater (olives) from olive presses

45 APPENDIX-C

Communities without Health Centers and Population > 500

No. of pub- No. of pri- No. of pub- SN ID Community name Population lic hospi- vate hospi- lic health (2019) tals tals centres 1 150975 ‘Iraq Burin 1038 0 0 0 2 150835 Zawata 2613 0 0 0 3 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 0 0 0 4 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 0 0 0 5 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 0 0 0 6 151420 Jalud 765 0 0 0 7 151050 Madama 2155 0 0 0 8 151180 Odala 1613 0 0 0 9 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 0 0 0 10 150770 Ijnisinya 603 0 0 0 11 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 0 0 0

Communities with Low Water Quality

Accepted bacterial Popu- Drinking Total bacterial tests ID Community name lation Water tests in year (2019) Quality (number) (Number) (%)

1 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 Acceptable 3 3 100 2 150960 Balata Camp 15076 Acceptable 34 28 82 3 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 Acceptable 0 0 0 4 150825 An Nassariya 1946 Acceptable 4 2 50 5 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 Bad 4 2 50 6 150805 Al Badhan 3450 Acceptable 4 4 100 7 50490 Ibziq 187 Acceptable 0 0 0 8 50525 Salhab 45 Acceptable 0 0 0 9 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 Acceptable 12 12 100 10 150695 Yasid 2550 Acceptable 8 7 88 11 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 Acceptable 0 0 0 12 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 Acceptable 12 12 100 13 150765 Sabastiya 3301 Acceptable 24 22 90 14 150770 Ijnisinya 603 Acceptable 13 13 100 15 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 Acceptable 6 6 100 16 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 Acceptable 4 4 100 17 50455 Kardala 220 Acceptable 3 3 100 18 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 Acceptable 24 24 100

46 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Not Sufficient Water Quantities in Summer

Popu- Water supply (m3/ SN ID Community name lation Water Demand (m3/ month) (2019) month) 1 150990 Tell 5317 18905 30000 2 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qa- 6734 22950 30000 deem) 3 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) 4911 16700 20000 4 150960 Balata Camp 15076 42290 55000 5 150975 ‘Iraq Burin 1038 2750 16978 6 50580 Al Malih 367 2000 13000 7 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 2200 35850 8 151215 Beita 12034 52150 60000 9 50551 Al Farisiya 125 620 800 10 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 550 800 11 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 730 800 12 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 12700 15000 13 150805 Al Badhan 3450 11500 15000 14 151420 Jalud 765 1800 3000 15 150775 Talluza 3400 11740 15000 16 151050 Madama 2155 7500 8000 17 151160 ‘Urif 3732 9600 15000 18 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 12070 20000 19 151335 Qabalan 8442 24750 36000 20 150695 Yasid 2550 7200 10000 21 151180 Odala 1613 5355 8000 22 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 5780 10000 23 151435 A’mmuriya 382 1700 15000 24 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 13700 20000 25 150680 Burqa 4277 18500 25000 26 150660 Bazzariya 2878 6585 10000 27 50455 Kardala 220 500 700 28 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 30430 50000

47 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Not Sufficient Water Pressure or/and Not Sufficient Water Network Supply Frequency in Summer

Popu- Water pressure is suffi- Water frequency is SN ID Community name lation cient? sufficient? (2019) Summer Winter Summer Winter 1 150990 Tell 5317 No Yes No Yes 2 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 No No No No 3 150960 Balata Camp 15076 No No No No 4 150950 Sarra 3486 No Yes No Yes 5 151010 Rujeib 6144 No No No Yes 6 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al 214 No No No No Ahmar 7 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 No Yes No Yes 8 151215 Beita 12034 No Yes No Yes 9 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 No No No No 10 150805 Al Badhan 3450 No Yes No No 11 151420 Jalud 765 No Yes No Yes 12 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 No Yes No Yes 13 150775 Talluza 3400 No No No No 14 151050 Madama 2155 No Yes No Yes 15 151160 ‘Urif 3732 No Yes No Yes 16 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 No Yes No Yes 17 151335 Qabalan 8442 No No No Yes 18 151435 A’mmuriya 382 No No No Yes 19 150680 Burqa 4277 No Yes No Yes 20 150785 An Naqura 1840 No Yes No Yes 21 50560 Al A’qaba 350 No No No No

48 APPENDIX-C

49 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Water Losses > 20%

Population Water losses WN establish- SN ID Community name WN condition )(2019 )%( ment year 1 150990 Tell 5317 21 2014 Good 2 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 25 2016 Good 3 150930 )A’skar Camp (al Qadeem 6734 34.7 2007 Leaking 4 150931 )A’skar Camp (al Jadeed 4911 34.7 2003 Leaking 5 150920 Nablus 161630 37 1934 Leaking 6 150860 Beit Iba 4202 49 1985 Bad 7 150835 Zawata 2613 48 1974 Bad 8 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 66 2006 Good 9 151010 Rujeib 6144 43 1983 Bad 10 150880 Ein Beit el Ma Camp‘ 3696 33 1965 Leaking 11 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 40 2016 Leaking 12 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 30 1978 Leaking 13 150825 An Nassariya 1946 43 1996 Leaking 14 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 45 2004 Bad 15 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 54 1982 Bad 16 151215 Beita 12034 40 1995 Bad 17 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 45 2007 Bad 18 150805 Al Badhan 3450 27 1978 Leaking 19 151185 Huwwara 6859 40 2003 Good 20 151410 Qaryut 2637 21 2014 Good 21 150775 Talluza 3400 32 1987 Leaking 22 151050 Madama 2155 49 2013 Good 23 151160 Urif‘ 3732 25 2013 Good 24 151335 Qabalan 8442 30 1984 Leaking 25 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 40 2006 Leaking 26 151180 Odala 1613 39 1981 Bad 27 151285 Za’tara 71 27 2010 Good 28 151195 Einabus‘ 2978 43 1989 Bad 29 50450 Ein el Beida‘ 1200 30 2006 Bad 30 151380 As Sawiya 2844 45 1990 Bad 31 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 34 1993 Leaking 32 150680 Burqa 4277 44 1968 Bad 33 150785 An Naqura 1840 34 1974 Bad 34 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 45 1987 Leaking 35 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 45 2011 Leaking 36 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 32 1974 Leaking 37 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 38 1980 Leaking

50 APPENDIX-C

51 APPENDIX-C

Communities with LCD < 67

Population LCD in LCD in Win- Average SN ID Community name (2019) Summer ter LCD 1 150990 Tell 5317 70.05 60.29 65.17 2 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 52.08 52.08 52.08 3 50580 Al Malih 367 43.60 36.33 39.96 4 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 61.67 46.95 54.31 5 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al 214 40.50 26.79 33.64 Ahmar 6 150855 Qusin 2319 75.46 54.33 64.90 7 151215 Beita 12034 85.02 46.80 65.91 8 50551 Al Farisiya 125 45.33 45.33 45.33 9 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 49.38 49.38 49.38 10 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 39.39 39.39 39.39 11 151185 Huwwara 6859 71.88 50.30 61.09 12 151410 Qaryut 2637 71.47 56.13 63.80 13 151420 Jalud 765 66.67 58.82 62.75 14 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 56.25 46.88 51.56 15 151050 Madama 2155 65.99 56.23 61.11 16 50490 Ibziq 187 24.96 49.91 37.43 17 50525 Salhab 45 40.00 33.33 36.67 18 151160 ‘Urif 3732 68.77 58.17 63.47 19 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 75.93 57.27 66.60 20 151335 Qabalan 8442 67.76 61.69 64.72 21 150695 Yasid 2550 70.59 52.55 61.57 22 151180 Odala 1613 72.34 54.94 63.64 23 50650 Kashda 65 69.23 60.00 64.62 24 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 52.63 43.86 48.25 25 151200 Yanun 89 70.04 56.55 63.30 26 150660 Bazzariya 2878 61.77 44.69 53.23 27 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 75.21 58.76 66.99 28 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 75.86 50.57 63.22 29 50455 Kardala 220 64.39 51.52 57.95 30 50420 Bardala 2400 72.22 61.11 66.67 31 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 71.93 48.70 60.32

52 APPENDIX-C

53 APPENDIX-C

Communities with water network coverage ≤ 90%

SN ID Community name Population WN Coverage (%) (2019) 1 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 80 2 50580 Al Malih 367 0 3 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 20 4 150825 An Nassariya 1946 80 5 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 80 6 50551 Al Farisiya 125 0 7 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 60 8 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 0 9 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 90 10 50490 Ibziq 187 60 11 151335 Qabalan 8442 90 12 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 85 13 150695 Yasid 2550 80 14 50650 Kashda 65 0 15 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 0 16 151435 A’mmuriya 382 88 17 50560 Al A’qaba 350 80

54 APPENDIX-C

55 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Not Good Water Network Condition

SN ID Community name Population WN Condi- WN Establishment (2019) tion Year 1 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qa- 6734 Leaking 2007 deem) 2 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) 4911 Leaking 2003 3 150920 Nablus 161630 Leaking 1934 4 150960 Balata Camp 15076 Leaking 1997 5 150860 Beit Iba 4202 Bad 1985 6 150835 Zawata 2613 Bad 1974 7 150810 Deir Sharaf 3038 Leaking 1968 8 151010 Rujeib 6144 Bad 1983 9 150880 ‘Ein Beit el Ma Camp 3696 Leaking 1965 10 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 Leaking 2016 11 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 Leaking 1978 12 150825 An Nassariya 1946 Leaking 1996 13 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 Bad 2004 14 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 Bad 1982 15 151215 Beita 12034 Bad 1995 16 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 Bad 2007 17 150805 Al Badhan 3450 Leaking 1978 18 150775 Talluza 3400 Leaking 1987 19 151335 Qabalan 8442 Leaking 1984 20 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 Leaking 2006 21 151180 Odala 1613 Bad 1981 22 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 Bad 1989 23 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 Bad 2006 24 151380 As Sawiya 2844 Bad 1990 25 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 Leaking 1993 26 150680 Burqa 4277 Bad 1968 27 150770 Ijnisinya 603 Leaking 2008 28 150785 An Naqura 1840 Bad 1974 29 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 Leaking 1987 30 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 Leaking 2011 31 50455 Kardala 220 Leaking 2002 32 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 Leaking 1974 33 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 Leaking 1980

56 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Cisterns Coverage < 20%

SN ID Community name Population HH with Cisterns (%) (2019) 1 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qadeem) 6734 0 2 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) 4911 0 3 150920 Nablus 161630 1 4 150960 Balata Camp 15076 0 5 150860 Beit Iba 4202 2 6 150835 Zawata 2613 0 7 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 0 8 150880 ‘Ein Beit el Ma Camp 3696 0 9 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 15 10 150855 Qusin 2319 0 11 150825 An Nassariya 1946 2 12 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 5 13 50551 Al Farisiya 125 0 14 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 0 15 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 5 16 150805 Al Badhan 3450 6 17 151185 Huwwara 6859 0 18 150775 Talluza 3400 2 19 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 2 20 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 0 21 150765 Sabastiya 3301 5 22 150785 An Naqura 1840 3 23 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 0 24 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 0 25 50455 Kardala 220 0 26 50420 Bardala 2400 0 27 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 0

57 APPENDIX-C

Communities Using Water Tankers

Popu- Distance of Water Prices of Water SN ID Community name lation nearest filling Tankers (2019) point (m) (NIS/m3) 1 150990 Tell 5317 350 16 2 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qa- 6734 1000 15 deem) 3 150931 A’skar Camp (al 4911 1000 15 Jadeed) 4 150920 Nablus 161630 1000 15 5 150960 Balata Camp 15076 200 25 6 150950 Sarra 3486 1500 25 7 150975 ‘Iraq Burin 1038 500 15 8 150860 Beit Iba 4202 100 15 9 150835 Zawata 2613 500 20 10 50580 Al Malih 367 8000 18 11 151010 Rujeib 6144 5000 23 12 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al 214 7000 20 Ahmar 13 150825 An Nassariya 1946 200 15 14 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 500 20 15 151215 Beita 12034 2000 30 16 50551 Al Farisiya 125 1500 17 17 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 1000 17 18 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 12000 23 19 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 3000 18 20 151410 Qaryut 2637 2000 16 21 151420 Jalud 765 5000 15 22 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 5000 15 23 150775 Talluza 3400 7000 25 24 50490 Ibziq 187 4000 15 25 151160 ‘Urif 3732 10000 17 26 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 10000 13 27 151335 Qabalan 8442 6000 30 28 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 3000 15 29 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 5000 15 30 151435 A’mmuriya 382 3000 30 31 50560 Al A’qaba 350 15000 20 32 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 1000 20

58 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Water network Price > 4 or Water Tankers Price ≥ 15

59 APPENDIX-C

60 APPENDIX-C Communities with Households that Pay Water Bills < 80%

SN ID Community name Population HH pay w bills (%) (2019) 1 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qadeem) 6734 10 2 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) 4911 10 3 150920 Nablus 161630 78 4 150960 Balata Camp 15076 1 5 150950 Sarra 3486 39 6 150835 Zawata 2613 67 7 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 12 8 151010 Rujeib 6144 55 9 150880 ‘Ein Beit el Ma Camp 3696 1 10 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 75 11 150825 An Nassariya 1946 10 12 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 0 13 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 10 14 151215 Beita 12034 67 15 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 0 16 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 40 17 150805 Al Badhan 3450 15 18 150775 Talluza 3400 5 19 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 12 20 150695 Yasid 2550 30 21 151180 Odala 1613 58 22 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 58 23 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 0 24 151435 A’mmuriya 382 66 25 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 70 26 150680 Burqa 4277 36 27 150770 Ijnisinya 603 74 28 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 20 29 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 57 30 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 44

Communities with Not Sufficient Water Storage Capacity

61 APPENDIX-C

Popu- Community w Reservoire supply SN ID Community name lation storage capacity in case of w cut (2019) (m3) (days) 1 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 0 na 2 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qa- 6734 0 0 deem) 3 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) 4911 0 0 4 150920 Nablus 161630 23822 0.5 5 150960 Balata Camp 15076 0 0 6 150950 Sarra 3486 250 0.5 7 150860 Beit Iba 4202 250 0.5 8 150835 Zawata 2613 0 0 9 50580 Al Malih 367 0 0 10 151010 Rujeib 6144 690 0.5 11 150880 ‘Ein Beit el Ma Camp 3696 0 0 12 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 0 0 13 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 0 0 14 150855 Qusin 2319 0 0 15 150825 An Nassariya 1946 200 0.2 16 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 0 0 17 151215 Beita 12034 500 0.3 18 50551 Al Farisiya 125 0 0 19 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 0 0 20 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 0 0 21 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 200 0.3 22 150805 Al Badhan 3450 300 1 23 151185 Huwwara 6859 675 1.5 24 151410 Qaryut 2637 3000 1 25 151420 Jalud 765 3000 1 26 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 5000 1 27 150775 Talluza 3400 200 0.5 28 50490 Ibziq 187 500 1 29 50525 Salhab 45 500 1 30 151160 ‘Urif 3732 500 1 31 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 500 0.5 32 151335 Qabalan 8442 200 0.5 33 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 350 0.5 34 150695 Yasid 2550 450 1 35 151180 Odala 1613 0 0 36 151285 Za’tara 71 0 0 37 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 0 0

62 APPENDIX-C

38 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 0 0 39 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 0 0 40 151380 As Sawiya 2844 200 0.5 41 151435 A’mmuriya 382 120 0.5 42 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 500 1 43 150765 Sabastiya 3301 320 0.5 44 150680 Burqa 4277 370 1 45 150770 Ijnisinya 603 350 3 46 50560 Al A’qaba 350 0 0 47 50420 Bardala 2400 40 0.25 48 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 90 1

63 APPENDIX-C

Communities with Bad WaSH Access

Popu- Water Sanitation SN ID Community name lation Solidwaste Access Access Access (2019) 1 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 Acceptable Bad Bad 2 150835 Zawata 2613 Good Acceptable Bad 3 50580 Al Malih 367 Bad Bad Bad 4 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al 214 Bad Bad Bad Ahmar 5 150825 An Nassariya 1946 Acceptable Bad Bad 6 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 Bad Bad Bad 7 50551 Al Farisiya 125 Bad Bad Bad 8 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 Bad Bad Bad 9 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 Bad Bad Bad 10 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 Acceptable Bad Good 11 150805 Al Badhan 3450 Bad Bad Bad 12 151420 Jalud 765 Acceptable Bad Acceptable 13 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 Bad Bad Bad 14 150775 Talluza 3400 Acceptable Bad Bad 15 151050 Madama 2155 Acceptable Acceptable Bad 16 50490 Ibziq 187 Acceptable Bad Bad 17 50525 Salhab 45 Acceptable Acceptable Bad 18 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 Good Bad Bad 19 150695 Yasid 2550 Bad Acceptable Acceptable 20 151180 Odala 1613 Acceptable Bad Good 21 151135 A’warta 7266 Acceptable Bad Acceptable 22 151285 Za’tara 71 Acceptable Bad Good 23 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 Bad Bad Bad 24 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 Acceptable Bad Acceptable 25 151200 Yanun 89 Acceptable Bad Bad 26 151380 As Sawiya 2844 Good Bad Good 27 151435 A’mmuriya 382 Acceptable Bad Bad 28 151405 Al Lubban ash Shar- 2719 Good Bad Good qiya 29 150765 Sabastiya 3301 Good Bad Bad 30 150680 Burqa 4277 Good Bad Good 31 150770 Ijnisinya 603 Good Bad Bad

64 APPENDIX-C

32 150660 Bazzariya 2878 Acceptable Bad Acceptable 33 150785 An Naqura 1840 Good Bad Bad 34 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 Acceptable Bad Bad 35 50420 Bardala 2400 Bad Bad Acceptable 36 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 Acceptable Bad Bad 37 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 Good Bad Acceptable

65 APPENDIX-C

Gender Perspective

Female staff Popu- Women partic- Female Com- member in SN ID Community name lation ipation in deci- plains on WaSH section (2019) sion-making % WaSH issues % % 1 150990 Tell 5317 7.3 6.7 0 2 50656 Khirbet Yarza 48 0.0 13.3 0 3 150930 A’skar Camp (al Qa- 6734 5.7 10.0 0 deem) 4 150931 A’skar Camp (al Jadeed) 4911 4.0 6.7 0 5 150920 Nablus 161630 15.0 20.0 7 6 150960 Balata Camp 15076 13.0 46.7 0 7 150950 Sarra 3486 15.0 8.3 0 8 150975 ‘Iraq Burin 1038 4.7 6.7 0 9 150860 Beit Iba 4202 22.0 30.0 22 10 150835 Zawata 2613 16.0 10.0 0 11 50580 Al Malih 367 0.0 3.3 0 12 151025 Kafr Qallil 3120 22.0 15.0 15 13 150810 Deir Sharaf 3038 23.0 23.3 0 14 151010 Rujeib 6144 11.0 30.0 7 15 150880 ‘Ein Beit el Ma Camp 3696 11.0 10.0 0 16 50720 Khirbet ar Ras al Ahmar 214 6.7 10.0 0 17 150875 Beit Wazan 1351 11.0 30.0 0 18 150855 Qusin 2319 11.0 20.0 25 19 150825 An Nassariya 1946 36.7 30.0 0 20 151030 Furush Beit Dajan 745 33.3 0.0 0 21 150935 Deir al Hatab 2923 14.7 6.7 0 22 151215 Beita 12034 18.0 23.3 0 23 50551 Al Farisiya 125 20.0 0.0 0 24 50470 Khirbet Tell el Himma 135 23.3 6.7 0 25 50871 Al Hadidiya 110 0.0 0.0 0 26 150840 Al A’qrabaniya 1200 30.0 33.3 0 27 150805 Al Badhan 3450 30.0 50.0 0 28 151185 Huwwara 6859 12.0 0.0 19 29 151410 Qaryut 2637 6.7 16.7 0 30 151420 Jalud 765 0.0 0.0 0 31 151450 Khirbet Sarra 32 0.0 0.0 0 32 150775 Talluza 3400 25.0 30.0 0 33 151050 Madama 2155 20.0 36.7 33

66 APPENDIX-C

34 50490 Ibziq 187 15.0 15.0 0 35 50525 Salhab 45 0.0 0.0 0 36 151160 ‘Urif 3732 22.0 18.3 25 37 151000 Beit Dajan 4594 20.0 30.0 0 38 151335 Qabalan 8442 15.0 26.7 20 39 50740 Wadi al Fara’a 4350 13.3 30.0 50 40 150695 Yasid 2550 26.7 30.0 0 41 151180 Odala 1613 14.7 40.0 0 42 151135 A’warta 7266 14.7 46.7 0 43 50650 Kashda 65 0.0 0.0 0 44 151285 Za’tara 71 0.0 0.0 0 45 151176 Khirbet Tana 19 10.0 18.3 19 46 151195 ‘Einabus 2978 8.0 18.3 0 47 50450 ‘Ein el Beida 1200 10.0 10.0 0 48 151200 Yanun 89 12.0 5.0 18 49 151380 As Sawiya 2844 12.5 6.7 0 50 151435 A’mmuriya 382 27.0 5.0 0 51 151405 Al Lubban ash Sharqiya 2719 20.0 6.7 0 52 150765 Sabastiya 3301 13.3 15.0 15 53 150680 Burqa 4277 7.3 15.0 14 54 150770 Ijnisinya 603 0.0 13.3 0 55 150660 Bazzariya 2878 7.3 15.0 0 56 150785 An Naqura 1840 24.0 36.7 0 57 50700 El Fara’a Camp 7800 15.0 15.0 0 58 50560 Al A’qaba 350 20.0 30.0 100 59 50670 Ras al Far’a 1450 20.0 20.0 0 60 50455 Kardala 220 35.0 35.0 0 61 50420 Bardala 2400 40.0 40.0 0 62 150745 Nisf Jubeil 485 3.3 33.3 25

63 150820 A’sira ash Shamaliya 9078 18.0 16.7 24

67 APPENDIX-C

68 APPENDIX-C

69