DOCSLIB.ORG

NORTH PENN AREA 5 RI/FS WORK PLAN Lansdale, Montgomery County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NORTH PENN AREA 5 RI/FS WORK PLAN Lansdale, Montgomery County \J- NORTH PENN AREA 5 RI/FS WORK PLAN Lansdale, Montgomery County, FINAL Submitted to: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region III 841 Chestnut Building Philadelphia. PA 19107 Prepared Fon BLANK, ROME, COMISKY AND McCAULEY Four Penn Center Plaza Philadelphia. Pennsylvania 19103 Prepared By: THE EARTH TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 53 Haddonfleld Road. Suite 316 Cherry Hill. New Jersey 08002 - Telephone: (609)482-5553/Fax: (609)482-6514 -PROJECT NO. 691546 SEPTEMBER 1993 AR3006I I TABLE OF CONTENTS .'"-.. :'" •'. '••- :' -.- . • SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background . 1 1.2 Project Objective 5 • 2.0 SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION 7 2.1 AEL , 7 2.2 Stabiius 9 2.3 KEMA/Powertest/Webcrafl/ABB 10 2.4 Byers Choice/Lindberg 10 2.5 R&B/FMC Corporation . 14 2.6 New Yorker Steel Boiler Company, Inc. 14 2.7 Neotech 17 2.8 Lumber Yard 17 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 18 3.1 Regional Site Setting 18 3.1.1 Regional Topography 18 3.1.2 Regional Soils " 18 3.1.3 Regional Geology 18 3.2 Site Setting 20 3.2.1 Site Topography 24 3.2.2 Site Soils 24 3.2.3 Site Geology 24 3.3 Regional Climate 24 3.4 Hydrology 26 3.4.1 Surface Water 26 3.4.2 Groundwater 26 3.4.2.1 Shallow (Perched) Aquifer 26 3.4.2,2 Bedrock Aquifer 26 i ' " . ' • ' 3.4.3 Monitor Wells 28 AR3006I2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE 4.0 SUMMARY OF PAST ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS 33 . 4.1 AEL 33 4,2 R& B/FMC 36 4.3 Stabiius 39 4.4 KEMA/Powertest/Webcraft/ABB 39 . .4.5 Existing Analytical Data QA/QC 43 4.6 Aerial Photograph Interpretation • 43 5.0 SUMMARY OF PAST REMEDIAL ACTIONS 45 6.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 48 6.1 Sources of Contamination 48 6.2 Contaminant Migration Pathways 48 6.3 Receptors 52 7.0 PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT 53 / - • • . • . • ' - ' ' - . 8.0 DEVELOPMENT OF POTENTIAL REMEDIAL ACTIONS 54 8.1 Preliminary Remedial Action Objectives 54 8.2 Identification of Potential Applicable or Relevant . and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) , 55 8.3 Potential Remedial Actions 59 8.3.1 Air 59 8.3.1.1 No Action 59 8.3.1.2 Source Removal 59 .8.3.1.3 Source Control ' 59 • . • . • • 8.3.2 Groundwater 60 • . ' • , 8.3.2.1 No Action 60 8.3.2.2 Institutional Actions 60 8.3.2.3 Containment 6X) 8.3.2.4 Collection, Treatment, and Discharge 61 AR300613 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE 8.3.3 SoU 61 8.3.3.1 No Action $! .8.3.3.2 Access Restrictions 6i 8.3.3.3 Capping 61 8.3.3.4 Excavation, Treatment, and Disposal 62 8.3.3.5 In Situ Treatment .63 8.3.4 Surface Water -63 , 8.3.4.1 No Action \ 64 8.3.4.2 Runoff Diversion 64 8.3.4.3 In Situ Aeration ' 64 8.3.5 Sediment •'-. 64 8.3.5.1 No Action 64 8.3.5.2 Excavation, Treatment, and Disposal 65 i . ' • . ' • - . 9.0 DATA GAPS REQUIRING RI/FS TASKS 66 ... * • 9.1 Soil Contamination , 66 : . " , * • 9.1.1 AEL 66 9.1.2 Stabiius 66 9.1.3 R&B/FMC 66 , 9.1.4 Powertest ' 66 9.1.5 Webcraft 67 9.1.6 New Yorker Steel Boiler , 67 9.2 Groundwater Contamination 67. 9.3 Hydraulic Characteristics of Aquifers , 67 9.4 Soil Physical Characteristics 68 9.5 Surface Water, Sediments, and Stormwater Characteristics 63 •. - 9.6 Treatability of Groundwater 68 9.7 TreatabiUty Studies 68 9.8 Data Quality Objectives 68 AR3006IU TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION DESCRIPTION fii PAGE 10.0 RI/FS SCOPE OF WORK 71 10.1 Project Planning 71 , 10.1.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan . 73 10.1.2 Quality Control 73 10.1.3 Project Management 73 10.1.4 Meeting Attendance 74 10.2 Community Relations - 74 10.2.1 Community Relations Plan 74 10.2.2 Community Relations Implementation 74 10.3 Field Investigation 75 10.3.1 Site Mobilization , 75 10.3.1.1 Subcontractor Procurement 75 10.3.1.2 Equipment Procurement and Site Setup 75 . 10.3.2 Surveying 75 10.3.3 Well Inventory 76 10.3.4 Soil Gas Survey 76 10.3.5 Soil Investigations 83 10.3.6 Groundwater Investigations . 91 10.3.6.1 Phase 1 - Groundwater Investigations 91 10.3.6.2 Phase 2 - Groundwater Investigations 94 10.3.6.3 Phase 3 - Groundwater Investigations 99 10.3.7 Surface Water and Sediment Investigations 103 10.3.7.1 Surface Water Runoff Flow Paths and Surface Water Bodies 103 10.3.7-2 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling 104 10.3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 104 103.9 Data Validation 107 10.3.10 Assessment of Risk 107 10.3.11 RI Derived Waste Disposal 107 10.4 Remedial Investigation Report 109 , 10.5 Feasibility Study 109 ftR3006l5 •TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE 10.5.1 Remedial Action Alternative Screening . 110 10.5.2 Development of Alternatives 110 10.5.3 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives 111 . 10.5.3.1 Compliance with ARARs . Ill 10.5.3.2 Short-Term Effectiveness HI , 10.5.3.3 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence 111 10.5.3.4 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment • , • ill 10.5.3.5 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, and Volume of Contaminants 112 10.5.3.6 Implementability 112 10.5.3.7 Cost 112 10.5.4 Summary Comparisons and Recommendation. of Remedial Alternatives 112 10.5.5 Feasibility Study Report 113 11.0 SCHEDULE 114 12.0 REFERENCES 116 AR300&16 LIST OF FIGURES SECTION DESCRIPTION 1-1 Site Location Map 2 1-2 North Perm Area 5 Site Plan 3 2 - 1 Site Plan -American Electronic Laboratories 8 2-2 Site Plan/Areas of Environmental Investigation - Stabiius 11 2. - 3 Site Plan - Powertest 12 2-4 Site Ban - Webcraft 13 2-5 Site Plan - R&B/FMC 15 2-6 Site Plan - New Yorker Steel Boiler 16 3-1 Regional Topographic Map V - 19 3-2 Regional Geologic Map . 23 3-3 Monitor Well Locations - American Electronic Laboratories 29 4-1 Areas of Environmental Investigation American Electronic Laboratories 34 4-2 Areas of Environmental Investigation - R&B/FMC 38 4-3 Site Plan/Monitor Well Locations - Powertest Facility 41 6-1 Groundwater Contours Deep Aquifer March 30, 1989 American Electronic Laboratories 50 10-1 Soil Investigation Areas-American Electronic Laboratories 77 10-2 Soil Investigation Areas-R&B/FMC 78 10-3 Soil Investigation Areas-Stabflus 79 10-4 Soil Investigation Area-Powertest Facility 80 10-5 Soil Investigation Area-Webcraft Facilities 81 10-6 Soil Investigation Areas-New Yorker Steel Boiler 82 10-7 Proposed Monitor Well Locations - North Perm Area 5 Site Plan 97 10-8 Surface Water and Sediment Sample Location Map 105 11-1 Schedule 115 AR30Q617 LIST OF TABLES SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE 1-1 Site Chronology 4 3-1 Geologic Section for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania 21 3-2 Soil Series Found in Regional Area 25 3-3 AEL Well Construction and Water-Level Data 30 4-1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling Analytical Results TCE Concentration in UG/L 37 4-2 R&B/FMC Groundwater Analytical Results 16 September 1987 40 8-1 Potential Chemical Specific Groundwater and Surface Water ARARs and TBCs for Organics 56 8-2 Potential Federal and State Action-Specific ARARs 58 9-1 Data Needs for the Area 5 Site , 70 10- 1 RI/FS Tasks 72 10-2 Soil Boring Program ! 85 10-3 Compounds to be Analyzed by the Field GCJ ,86 10-4 Target Compound List (VOCs Only) Target Analyte List and selected indicator Parameters 87 10-5 Groundwater investigations-Rationale for Proposed Monitor Well Locations 96 10 - 6 Phase 2 Groundwater Sampling Program 98 10-7 : . Groundwater Investigations-Proposed Monitor Well Construction Details 100 10-8 Phase 3 Groundwater Sampling Program . 102 10-9 Surface Water, Sediment and Sewer Sampling Program 106 10 - 10 Summary of QA/QC Program . 108 AR3006 I ft LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS RI/FS Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study NPL National Priorities List NPWA North Perm Water Authority PADER Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds TCE Trichloroethene PCE Tetrachloroethene NUS NUS Corporation TCA 1,1,1-trichloroethahe PRP's Potentially responsible parties AEL American Electronic Laboratory R&B R&B, Inc. CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 BCM Betz. Converse & Murdoch MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone FMC FMC Corporation MSL Mean sea level GPM Gallons per minute TSD TSD Environmental Services . USGS United States Geological Survey , . NWWA North Wales Water Authority UST Underground Storage Tank MCL Maximum Contaminant Level DCA Dichloroethane DCE Dichloroethene ARARs Applicable and Relevant or Appropriate Requirements EPA Environmental Protection Agency RFD Risk Reference Dose TBC To-Be-Considered NCP • National Contingency Plan NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act DQOs Data Quality Objectives SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan . QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control CLP Contract Laboratory Program SAS Special Analytical Services QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan FSP Field Sampling Plan CRP Community Relations Plan PID - Photoionization detector GC Gas Chrornatograph AR3006I9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (Continued) -• • v • HSP Health and Safety Plan TCL Target Compound List x RPM Regional Project Manager SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act PHE " Public Health Evaluation AR300620 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION This work plan presents the technical approach and methodologies developed to complete the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the North Penn Area 5, National Priorities List (NPL) site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrogeology and Ground-Water Quality of Northern Bucks County, Pennsylvania
    HYDROGEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER QUALITY OF NORTHERN BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA by Ronald A. Sloto and Curtis L Schreftier ' U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4109 Prepared in cooperation with NEW HOPE BOROUGH AND BRIDGETON, BUCKINGHAM, NOCKAMIXON, PLUMSTEAD, SOLEBURY, SPRINGFIELD, TINICUM, AND WRIGHTSTOWN TOWNSHIPS Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, MS 517 840 Market Street Denver Federal Center Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-1586 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................2 Purpose and scope ..................................................................... 2 Location and physiography ............................................................. 2 Climate...............................................................................3 Well-numbering system................................................................. 4 Borehole geophysical logging............................................................4 Previous investigations ................................................................. 6 Acknowledgments....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents
    Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents Page A1.0 OVERVIEW………………………………………………………………………… 1 A2.0 HYDROLOGIC /WATER QUALITY MODELING………………………………. 8 A2.1 Data Compilation and Model Overview………………………………………… 8 A2.2 GIS-Based Derivation of Input Data……………………………………………. 10 A2.3 Watershed Model Calibration…………………………………………………… 10 A2.4 Relationship Between Dissolved Oxygen Levels, Nutrient Loads and Organic Enrichment…………………………………………………………….. 16 B. POINT SOURCE TMDLs FOR THE ENTIRE NESHAMINY CREEK WATERSHED (Executive Summary)……….……….………………………. 18 B1.0 INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………………………………. 19 B2.0 EVALUATION OF POINT SOURCE LOADS……………………………………. 20 B3.0 REACH BY REACH ASSESSMENT……………………………………………… 27 B3.1 Cooks Run (482A)………………………………………………………………. 27 B3.2 Little Neshaminy Creek (980629-1342-GLW)………………..………………… 27 B3.3 Mill Creek (20010417-1342-GLW)…………………………………………….. 29 B3.4 Neshaminy Creek (467)………………………………………….……………… 30 B3.5 Neshaminy Creek (980515-1347-GLW)..…………………….………….……… 32 B3.6 Neshaminy Creek (980609-1259-GLW)………………………..………………. 32 B3.7 Park Creek (980622-1146-GLW)………………………………..……………… 34 B3.8 Park Creek (980622-1147-GLW)……………………………..………………… 35 B3.9 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (492)……………………………..……………. 35 B3.10 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980202-1043-GLW)…………..……………. 36 B3.11 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1330-GLW)………………………… 37 B3.12 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1333-GLW)………………………… 38 C. LITTLE NESHAMINY CREEK……………………………………………………… 40 D. LAKE GALENA……………………………………………………………………… 58 E. PINE RUN…………………………………………………………………………….. 78 i Table of Contents (cont.) Page F. SUB-BASIN #1 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 94 G. SUB-BASIN #2 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 107 H. SUB-BASIN #3 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK…………………….. 121 I. SUB-BASIN #4 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 138 J. COOKS RUN………………………………………………………………………….. 155 K.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
    Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission BUCKS COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY AND MITIGATION STRATEGY Prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission This Economic Adjustment Strategy was accomplished by staff of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission through Economic Development Administration Adjustment Strategy Grant No. 01-09-58005. The statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and other data in this report are solely those of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration. The background flood map is used in part solely for state affairs only. courtesy FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION SEPTEMBER 1998 DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Publication Abstract TITLE Date Published: September 1998 Bucks County Flood Recovery and Mitigation Strategy Publication No. 98032 Geographic Area Covered: Bucks County Key Words: Floods, Flooding, Floodplain, Flood Prone, Flood Proofing, Regulations, Impervious Coverage, Watersheds, Sub-Basin 2, Emergency Management, Neshaminy Creek, Buck Creek, Brock Creek, National Flood Insurance Program, Levee, Dam, Floodwall, Acquisition, Relocation, Army Corps of Engineers, Delaware River Basin Commission ABSTRACT This report provides a flood recovery and mitigation strategy for those flood prone communities in Bucks County. As an element of a flood mitigation plan for eastern Pennsylvania, which
    [Show full text]
  • A Timeline of Bucks County History 1600S-1900S-Rev2
    A TIMELINE OF BUCKS COUNTY HISTORY— 1600s-1900s 1600’s Before c. A.D. 1609 - The native peoples of the Delaware Valley, those who greet the first European explorers, traders and settlers, are the Lenni Lenape Indians. Lenni Lenape is a bit of a redundancy that can be translated as the “original people” or “common people.” Right: A prehistoric pot (reconstructed from fragments), dating 500 B.C.E. to A.D. 1100, found in a rockshelter in northern Bucks County. This clay vessel, likely intended for storage, was made by ancestors of the Lenape in the Delaware Valley. Mercer Museum Collection. 1609 - First Europeans encountered by the Lenape are the Dutch: Henry Hudson, an Englishman sailing under the Dutch flag, sailed up Delaware Bay. 1633 - English Captain Thomas Yong tries to probe the wilderness that will become known as Bucks County but only gets as far as the Falls of the Delaware River at today’s Morrisville. 1640 - Portions of lower Bucks County fall within the bounds of land purchased from the Lenape by the Swedes, and a handful of Swedish settlers begin building log houses and other structures in the region. 1664 - An island in the Delaware River, called Sankhickans, is the first documented grant of land to a European - Samuel Edsall - within the boundaries of Bucks County. 1668 - The first grant of land in Bucks County is made resulting in an actual settlement - to Peter Alrichs for two islands in the Delaware River. 1679 - Crewcorne, the first Bucks County village, is founded on the present day site of Morrisville.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Valley Regional Comprehensive Plan May 2015
    INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAY 2015 INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAY 2015 (Final adoption June 1, 2016) i INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ii INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One – Community Profile 1 Chapter Two – Existing Land Use 31 Chapter Three – Goals and Objectives 43 Chapter Four – Natural Environment 49 Chapter Five – Open Space 81 Chapter Six – Community Facilities 97 Chapter Seven – Transportation 111 Chapter Eight – Economic Development 145 Chapter Nine – Housing 161 Chapter Ten - Future Land Use Plan 175 Appendices Appendix A Resolutions for Plan Adoption iii INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN iv INDIAN VALLEY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE The Indian Valley is located in the north central section of Montgomery County. It includes the four townships of Franconia, Lower Salford, Salford, and Upper Salford and the two boroughs of Souderton and Telford. These six municipalities comprise a region nearly 49 square miles in size. As little as 30 years ago, the region was an undeveloped, rural area with many working farms and a few small villages. While a good portion of the Indian Valley retains that rural character to this day, much of the region has changed. Growth pressures pushing outward from Philadelphia have resulted in the rapid construction of many homes and businesses on what was once open land. Similar growth and development patterns have occurred repeatedly throughout Montgomery County and the larger Delaware Valley region. The development patterns experienced by the Indian Valley region can be largely attributed to the fact that the region is conveniently located for easy access to jobs, stores, and highways.
    [Show full text]
  • MINOW Neshaminy Creek Report 2016
    MINOW Management and Implementation for Neshaminy(Creek) Optimal Watershed Report By: Shannon Heybach, Katja Burke, and Patti Stelmaszczyk Table of Contents Mission Statement………………………………………………………………………………………2 Goals……………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………....2 Background/CHaracteristics…………………………………………………………………..2 Figure 1: Map of Neshaminy Creek Watershed Table 2: Land Use Distribution of Neshaminy Creek Watershed Land Use………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Figure 2: Pennsylvania Land Use Table 2: Land Use Distribution of Neshaminy Creek Watershed Water Use……………………………………………………………………………………....5 Table 3: Summary of water discharges and withdrawals in the Neshaminy Creek Figure 3: Water withdrawn in the Neshaminy Creek watershed Environmental Concerns and Other Issues…………………………………………………………..7 Storms and Flooding…………………………………………………………………………...7 Figure 4: Flooding from Hurricane Irene in Neshaminy Creek Streambank Erosion and Habitat Loss…………………………………………………….8 Water Quality………………………………………………………………………………...9 Existing Organizations and Regulations……………………………………………………………10 Solutions……………………………………………………………………………………………...11 Sources……………………………………………………………………………………………….12 Mission Statement: To reduce Neshaminy Creek flow for a 2­year design storm by 10% before January 2020, thus improving water quality, preventing erosion, and preventing habitat loss. Goals: G1: To minimize flood events and protect from property damage G2: To minimize major erosion of stream banks G3: To secure floodplain land as habitat for wildlife G4: To ensure fishable and drinkable water by improving water quality in the Neshaminy Creek. Introduction: Background/Characteristics Figure 1: Map of Neshaminy Creek Watershed The Neshaminy Creek is 41 miles long, has headwaters starting in Bucks and Montgomery counties and extends to its mouth, on the Delaware River, in Bensalem Township. The entire drainage area is 233 square miles and held a population 256,000 in 1990, 333,297 in 2000 and is projected to reach 368,000 by 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • Septa-Phila-Transit-Street-Map.Pdf
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q v A Mill Rd Cricket Kings Florence P Kentner v Jay St Linden Carpenter Ho Cir eb R v Newington Dr Danielle Winding W Eagle Rd Glen Echo Rd B Ruth St W Rosewood Hazel Oak Dr Orchard Dr w For additional information on streets and b v o o r Sandpiper Rd A Rose St oodbine1500 e l Rock Road A Surrey La n F Cypress e Dr r. A u Dr Dr 24 to Willard Dr D 400 1 120 ant A 3900 ood n 000 v L v A G Norristown Rd t Ivystream Rd Casey ie ae er Irving Pl 0 Beachwoo v A Pine St y La D Mill Rd A v Gwynedd p La a Office Complex A Rd Br W Valley Atkinson 311 v e d 276 Cir Rd W A v Wood y Mall Milford s r Cir Revere A transit services ouside the City of 311 La ay eas V View Dr y Robin Magnolia R Daman Dr aycross Rd v v Boston k a Bethlehem Pike Rock Rd A Meyer Jasper Heights La v 58 e lle H La e 5 Hatboro v Somers Dr v Lindberg Oak Rd A re Overb y i t A ld La Rd A t St ll Wheatfield Cir 5 Lantern Moore Rd La Forge ferson Dr St HoovStreet Rd CedarA v C d right Dr Whitney La n e La Round A Rd Trevose Heights ny Valley R ay v d rook Linden i Dr i 311 300 Dekalb Pk e T e 80 f Meadow La S Pl m D Philadelphia, please use SEPTA's t 150 a Dr d Fawn V W Dr 80- arminster Rd E A Linden sh ally-Ho Rd W eser La o Elm Aintree Rd ay Ne n La s Somers Rd Rd S Poplar RdS Center Rd Delft La Jef v 3800 v r Horseshoe Mettler Princeton Rd Quail A A under C A Poquessing W n Mann Rd r Militia Hill Rd v rrest v ve m D p W UPPER Grasshopper La Prudential Rd lo r D Newington Lafayette A W S Lake Rd 1400 3rd S eldon v e Crestview ly o TURNPIKE A Neshaminy s o u Rd A Suburban Street and Transit Map.
    [Show full text]
  • Bucks County
    BUCKS COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge replacement on Worthington Mill Road in Northampton and Wrightstown BASE Bridge Replacement Worthington Mill Road Bridge Townships 1 $ 3,300,000 1 1 0.3 Reconstruct roadway on Lawn Avenue from Maple Avenue to Farmers Lane in BASE Reconstruct Lawn Avenue from Maple Avenue to Farmers Lane Sellersville Borough and West Rockhill Township 2 $ 15,000,000 0 0 0.72 BASE Bridge Replacement Clay Ridge Road Bridge Bridge replacement on Clay Ridge Road over Beaver Creek in Tinicum Township 2 $ 3,525,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement Old Bethlehem Road over Kimple Creek Bridge replacement on Old Bethlehem Road over Kimple Creek in Haycock Township 1 $ 4,767,300 1 0 0.25 BASE Bridge Replacement Pineville Road over Pidcock Creek Bridge replacement on Pineville Road over Pidcock Creek in Buckingham Township 1 $ 1,925,000 1 1 0.09 BASE Bridge Replacement Walnut Street over Perkiomen Creek Bridge replacement on Walnut Street over Perkiomen Creek in Perkasie Borough 1 $ 4,741,000 1 1 0.04 BASE Bridge Replacement Racket Road over Morris Creek Bridge replacement on Rickert Road over Morris Creek in Hilltown Township 1 $ 1,021,900 1 1 0.01 BASE Bridge Replacement Main Street over SEPTA Bridge replacement on Main Street over SEPTA in Sellersville Borough 1 $ 4,180,000 1 1 0.03 Reconstruction and widening of PA 663 from Weiss Road to Mill Hill Road and replacement of two bridges on PA 663 over Unami Creek and Licking Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL Comprehensive Plan June 2008 Bristol Township Comprehensive Plan 2008 ADOPTED JUNE 19, 2008 BY BRISTOL TOWNSHIP COUNCIL TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL 2501 Bath Road Bristol, Pennsylvania 19007 P: 215-785-0500 ~ F: 215-785-2131 www.bristoltownship.org PHOTOGRAPHS ON COVER (clockwise from top left) War Dog Memorial—Bristol Township Municipal Campus Delaware River—Burlington-Bristol Bridge George Washington Elementary School—Levittown PA Route 413—Town Center District Silver Lake County Park Croydon Manor Edgely Fire Company No. 1 Legacy at West Bristol BRISTOL TOWNSHIP COUNCIL Tina Davis, Chairman Linda Tarlini, Vice Chairman Don Mobley, Member John Monahan, Member Rick Pluta, Member BRISTOL TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE Jeff Bartlett, Managing Director Glenn Kucher, Director of Building, Planning & Zoning Tom McDermott, Director of Community Development Russ Sacco, Township Solicitor Gary Smith, Township Engineer Tina Davis, Council Chairman Linda Tarlini, Council Vice Chairman Rick Pluta, Council Member PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY BUCKS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 1260 ALMSHOUSE ROAD DOYLESTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA 18901 P: 215-215-345-3400 ~ F: 215-345-3886 www.buckscounty.org This document was prepared with financial assistance from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development through a Land Use Planning and Technical Assistance Program (LUPTAP) grant. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 1 The Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Little Neshaminy Creek River Conservation Plan
    Executive Summary Little Neshaminy Creek River Conservation Plan Little Neshaminy Creek at Forks of the Neshaminy September 2007 Project was funded by a Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund Program Grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, 85 Old Dublin Pike Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Doylestown, PA 18901 (215) 345-7020 (215) 345-4328 www.heritageconservancy.org Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Management Program FINAL REPORT “Little Neshaminy Creek River Conservation Plan” Final Report September 2007 CZM PROJECT NUMBER: CZ1: 2004-PD.08 This project was funded, in part, through a Federal Coastal Zone Management Grant, administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Funding provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), United States Department of Commerce, under Award Number: NA07OZ0130. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, the PA DEP nor any of their sub-agencies. Acknowledgements This project is funded in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, administered by the Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Matching funds were provided through a grant of the Pennsylvania Coastal Zone Management Program, funded by the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration and administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. The following
    [Show full text]
  • Project Listings
    Chapter 9: Project Listings Highway Projects for the FY2021 TIP 8LMW4EKI-RXIRXMSREPP]0IJX&PERO DVRPC FY2021-2024 TIP for PA Final Version Pennsylvania - Highway Program (Status: TIP) Bucks MPMS# 12923 Bristol Road Extension SR:2025 LIMITS US 202 to Park Avenue Est Let Date: 12/8/2022 IMPROVEMENT Roadway New Capacity NHPP: MRPID:119 MUNICIPALITIES: Chalfont Borough; New Britain Borough; New Britain Township FC: 16 AQ Code:2035M PLAN CENTER: Town Center IPD: 14 PROJECT MANAGER: HNTB/N. Velaga CMP: Major SOV Capacity CMP Subcorridor(s): 8G, 12B Provide a two lane extension of Bristol Road from Business Route 202 to Park Avenue. When completed, this improvement will provide a two-lane bypass around Chalfont Borough which will eliminate trips on Business Route 202 and turning movements at the Business Route 202/PA 152 intersection. Project may involve relocation of SEPTA siding track, a bridge across the wetlands, widening the intersection at Bristol Road and Business Route 202 to provide right and left turning lanes, providing maintenance of traffic during construction, redesigning traffic signals and rail road crossing gates at Business Route 202 and Bristol Road extension and coordination with SEPTA. Project CMP (Congestion Management Process) commitments include sidewalks, signal and intersection improvements, turning movement enhancements, and coordination with SEPTA. See DVRPC’s 2016-2017 memorandum on supplemental strategies for details related to this project. TIP Program Years ($ 000) Phase Fund FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
    [Show full text]