DOCSLIB.ORG

2017-06-21 NC Minutes (Final).Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017-06-21 NC Minutes (Final).Pdf Minutes National Council Date Wednesday 21st June 2017 Time 13:00 – 16:40 Location Virginia Woolf Room, Bloomsbury House, London, WC1A 2RL Present Sir Nicholas Serota CH Chair of the Arts Council Maria Balshaw CBE National Council Member (Items 1-9) Matthew Bowcock CBE National Council Member David Bryan National Council Member Professor Jon Cook South East Area Council Chair Joe Docherty North Area Council Chair David Joseph CBE National Council Member (Items 1-6) Sheila Healy South West Area Council Chair Sir Nicholas Kenyon National Council Member Nazo Moosa National Council Member (Items 1-9) Peter Phillips Midlands Area Council Chair Alistair Spalding CBE National Council Member Rosemary Squire OBE National Council Member Veronica Wadley London Area Council Chair Apologies Also Darren Henley OBE Chief Executive Present: Laura Dyer Deputy Chief Executive, Places and Engagement Simon Mellor Deputy Chief Executive, Arts and Culture Richard Russell Executive Director, Chief Operating Officer Elizabeth Bushell Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer Mags Patten Executive Director, Public Policy and Communications Francis Runacres Executive Director, Enterprise & Innovation Ruth Alaile Director, Governance and Planning Jane Dawson Director, Funding Programmes Eddie de Souza Director Investment Melloney Poole Legal Consultant (Items 1-8) Tharsi Jorganathan Solicitor, Governance and Planning (Items 1-8) Jenna Birley Assistant, Governance and Planning Sarah Crown Director, Literature and Bristol (Item 11) Paul Blackmore Senior Manager, Estates and Facilities (Item 12) David Bryant Senior Governance Officer (minutes) Action 1. 1. WELCOME AND APOLOGIES 1.1 1.1 Sir Nicholas Serota welcomed council members, Executive Board and other 1.2 officers to the meeting. 1.3 1.4 1.2 The Chair opened the meeting acknowledging that the Grenfell Tower fire had left London, the UK and the arts in a sombre mood. He expressed his profound sadness at the loss of the artist Khadija Saye who died in the incident. She was an important emerging artist as her work at the Diaspora Exhibition at the 57th Venice showed. He informed National Council members that he expected there would be a memorial and fund to mark her memory. 2. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 2.1 The Chair outlined the Arts Council’s policy on managing conflicts of interest and loyalty, explaining that the general principle was that if a member of the public would reasonably conclude that an interest a Council member or officer has might influence the approach they take, they must declare it. He explained that if any member of either National Council or Executive Board had a financial interest or a high risk conflict of loyalty for any particular organisation for which a discussion took place, they should withdraw from the meeting at that point and take no part in the discussion or voting. 2.2 The register of interest of Council members as at 21 June was circulated at the meeting and is appended to these minutes for the record. 3. MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 30 MAY 2017 3.1 The minutes of the meeting held on 30 May 2017 were approved as a true and accurate record of the meeting. 4. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MEETING HELD ON 30 MAY 2017 4.1 There were no matters arising from the minutes of the previous meeting not addressed elsewhere on the agenda. Page 2 of 14 5. CHAIR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT 5.1 The Chief Executive outlined the details of the new ministerial team at the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) following the General Election. Karen Bradley remains the Secretary of State for DCMS, and John Glen was appointed Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for DCMS on 14th June, and will hold the responsibility for arts, culture, heritage, public libraries, museums, National Archives and tourism. Both the Chief Executive and Chair have had a very positive introductory meeting with the new Minister. 5.2 National Council AGREED to note the contents of the Chair and Chief Executive’s Report. 6. NATIONAL PORTFOLIO OF ORGANISATIONS 2018/19 TO 2021/22 6.1 Sir Nick Serota outlined the purpose of this agenda item. He reminded National Council that its role was to make final decisions on all National Portfolio Organisation (NPO) applications above £800,000 per annum and to note and consider whether there were any Area Council decisions for applications less than £800,000 that National Council ought to review and call in. Members were also to consider Area Council uplifts which took the total proposed funding of any organisation over the £800,000 threshold and any particular applications for under £800,000 that had been referred to National Council by any of the Area Councils. 6.2 National Council and Officers were reminded of the Arts Council’s policy on managing conflicts of interest/loyalty which is that a Council member or officer with an interest in a particular applicant or application should declare it. Where there was a financial interest such as being employed by the applicant or a high risk conflict of loyalty such as membership or former membership of the board, the interest was regarded as disqualifying and they should withdraw from the meeting and not take part in the discussion, or decision on that application. 6.3 The interests declared in relation to the National Portfolio Organisations applications are published on our website. Page 3 of 14 6.4 It was also noted that Council members had previously declared non- disqualifying interests in artforms, and sectors as follows: Jon Cook – Literature David Joseph – Music Nick Kenyon – Music and Education Alistair Spalding – Dance Sheila Healy – Education Joe Docherty – Education Veronica Wadley – Music Rosemary Squire – Theatre And Dance Maria Balshaw - Museums and visual arts Nick Serota – Visual Arts 6.5 The Chair set out the format of the discussion and reminded everyone of the importance of maintaining confidentiality, asking members to note that all final decisions would be embargoed until 10:30am on 27th June. 6.6 Richard Russell introduced the report which presented the proposed portfolio of “National Portfolio Organisations” for 2018-19 to 2021/22 that Executive Board was recommending to National Council. He reminded members of National Council’s role which was to: - Consider and approve the final National Portfolio budget - Consider and approved the National Equality analysis and action plan, - Make decisions on applications for more than £800,000 in any one financial year and any matters that Area Councils have referred to Council for decision - Consider the overall portfolio following area council decision to ensure it is adequately balanced. 6.7 He gave a brief overview of the process to date. This included the process for uplifts. The Executive and Area Councils had adhered strictly to the agreed criteria of awarding these in exceptional circumstances where: Exciting but realistic ambition is shown something clearly additional to the existing programme of work is offered increased value to the communities the organisation works with is demonstrated something needed or wanted by the organisation’s audiences and/or communities is offered the organisation’s artistic or cultural programme is being developed in a meaningful and sustainable way Page 4 of 14 the organisation’s resilience and reducing the longer term grant dependency is strengthened. Having regard to this criteria, uplifts were proposed for 8.4% of the portfolio. 6.8 National Portfolio Budget Members considered the revised budget proposals and agreed them. This included a £194,410 increase per annum to the provisional budget to enable the funding of two Sector Support Organisations to make a significant contribution to achieving the strategy. 6.9 Equality Analysis and Action Plan National Council members were invited to consider the Equality Analysis that had been appended to the report to support their decision making, and the equality action plan which set out the steps Arts Council England will take to address the issues identified. Members noted that each Area Council had also been presented with an equality analysis to inform their decision- making. 6.10 Members discussed the National Equality Analysis. There was a discussion about the diversity of the leadership of the proposed portfolio where it was pointed out that that leadership diversity varied significantly across the different bands. Band 1 was the most diverse, but for example none of the proposed Band 3 organisations were Black or Minority Ethnic (BME) led. Simon Mellor explained the expectations that would be placed on the different bands in terms of equality and diversity in 2018-2022. He reminded members that we would not be signing a funding agreement with an organisation with a ‘not met’ rating on Creative Case for Diversity. In addition, all band 2 and 3 organisations will be required to be rated ‘Strong’ by October 2021. 6.11 National Council members were informed that they would be provided with a report on diversity annually. 6.12 National Council endorsed and approved the Equality Analysis and Equality action plan. 6.13 Overall Portfolio/Above £800,000 applications Each Area Council Chair provided feedback from their Area Council meeting. It was noted that there had been positive and lively discussions at all the area council meetings. Area Councils had welcomed both the Page 5 of 14 thoroughness of the process and the well thought out proposals that had been presented to them. They also acknowledged that our funding reach is now creating more diverse arts organisations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CVAN Open Letter to the Secretary of State for Education
    Press Release: Wednesday 12 May 2021 Leading UK contemporary visual arts institutions and art schools unite against proposed government cuts to arts education ● Directors of BALTIC, Hayward Gallery, MiMA, Serpentine, Tate, The Slade, Central St. Martin’s and Goldsmiths among over 300 signatories of open letter to Education Secretary Gavin Williamson opposing 50% cuts in subsidy support to arts subjects in higher education ● The letter is part of the nationwide #ArtIsEssential campaign to demonstrate the essential value of the visual arts This morning, the UK’s Contemporary Visual Arts Network (CVAN) have brought together leaders from across the visual arts sector including arts institutions, art schools, galleries and universities across the country, to issue an open letter to Gavin Williamson, the Secretary of State for Education asking him to revoke his proposed 50% cuts in subsidy support to arts subjects across higher education. Following the closure of the consultation on this proposed move on Thursday 6th May, the Government has until mid-June to come to a decision on the future of funding for the arts in higher education – and the sector aims to remind them not only of the critical value of the arts to the UK’s economy, but the essential role they play in the long term cultural infrastructure, creative ambition and wellbeing of the nation. Working in partnership with the UK’s Visual Arts Alliance (VAA) and London Art School Alliance (LASA) to galvanise the sector in their united response, the CVAN’s open letter emphasises that art is essential to the growth of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • “Museum Visionary” by Smithsonian Magazine, a Silicon Valley
    Nina Simon Nina Simon has been called a “museum visionary” by Smithsonian Magazine, a Silicon Valley Business Journal “40 under 40,” and Santa Cruz County Woman of the Year for her innovative community leadership. She is the Executive Director of the Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History and the founder/CEO of the OF/BY/FOR ALL movement. Nina is the best-selling author of The Participatory Museum (2010), The Art of Relevance (2016) and the popular Museum 2.0 blog. She lives off the grid in the Santa Cruz mountains with 20 people, 24 chickens, 5 dogs, and 1 zipline. Esme Ward Esme Ward was appointed Director of the Manchester Museum, the UK’s largest university museum, in April 2018 and is the first woman to hold the role in its 125-year history. Prior to this, she was Head of Learning and Engagement at Manchester Museum and the Whitworth, where she worked alongside Maria Balshaw on the £15 million redevelopment of the Whitworth. She is leading a significant capital development at Manchester Museum, renewing the creative and civic mission of the organisation with the ambition to become the most inclusive, imaginative and caring museum. In 2016/17 she was a fellow on the Clore Cultural Leadership Programme, exploring social and civic purpose, leadership and the future of museums. Her career has been driven by these values and a longstanding commitment to make museums more inclusive and relevant to the communities they serve. In 2018 Esme was awarded Honorary Professor of Heritage Futures from the University of Manchester. Esme is also the Culture Strategic Lead for Age Friendly Manchester and the Greater Manchester Ageing Hub, which heavily influences her work at the museum, ensuring culture in the city is accessible to all generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Report About the Project Director: Factory Manchester and Structural
    Manchester City Council Item 7 Personnel Committee 2 March 2016 Manchester City Council Report for Resolution Report to Personnel Committee - 2 March 2016 Subject: Project Director: Factory Manchester and structural changes in Strategic Development Report of: Chief Executive ___________________________________________________________________ Purpose This report seeks to establish a new fixed term role of Project Director for Factory Manchester for a period of up to 4 years to cover the period between June 2016 and January 2020. Recommendations: The Personnel Committee is recommended to: 1. Approve the creation of a position of Project Director for Factory Manchester at a salary of up to £140,000 for a period of up to 4 years and make a recommendation to Council on the remuneration for the post in line with the Council’s Pay Policy. 2. To appoint a subcommittee of four members to act as the appointment panel for the appointment of this position, with a quorum of three of the members for a meeting of the subcommittee. 3. To appoint a member as the Chair of the subcommittee. 4. To co-opt onto the subcommittee, as a non-voting member, a nominee of the Arts Council England so they may attend meetings of the subcommittee and be present during the consideration of any confidential business. 5. To delegate authority to the Deputy Chief Executive (Growth and Neighbourhoods), in consultation with the Chair of the subcommittee, to progress all aspects of the recruitment of the Project Director: Factory Manchester up to the point where a meeting of the appointment panel is necessary. 6. Approve an amendment to structural reporting lines for the Strategic Director (Strategic Development) and the structural position of the City Centre Growth and Regeneration team.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Breakthrough Fund Funding for Exceptional Cultural Entrepreneurs
    2010 Breakthrough Fund Funding for exceptional cultural entrepreneurs Maria Balshaw – Whitworth Art Gallery Stewart Laing – Untitled Projects Matt Peacock – Streetwise Opera Simon Pearce – The Invisible Dot Ltd Gavin Wade – Eastside Projects The Breakthrough Fund A successful arts economy requires not only great artists, but also Nominations process talented and visionary people who can enable these artists to make The Breakthrough Fund identified potential applicants through a process of great things happen. Paul Hamlyn Foundation set up the Breakthrough confidential nominations, asking a range of nominators to help spot talent Fund, over an initial period of three years, to support exceptional and share their intelligence across regions and art forms. Whilst art form and cultural entrepreneurs. This year sees the third and final funding round regional spread are not criteria for support, we believe that a balance has of the initiative as it was originally devised. PHF will now evaluate the emerged over the three years of the Fund. programme and start to assess its impact, with a view to reviewing This year, 15 nominators were chosen for their expertise and experience. findings in 2011/12 – and sharing them as widely as possible. They gave their personal recommendations without the nominees’ Cultural entrepreneurs may appear in a range of roles and with various titles – knowledge. Over 40 nominees were put forward and invited to enter the producers, artistic or executive directors, curators, chief executives – but they application process. each possess a pressing and persuasive vision, a drive and a strong track Paul Hamlyn Foundation gratefully acknowledges the invaluable contribution record of making things happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Balshaw: Tate’S First Female Director
    ALUMNI MARIA BALSHAW: TATE’S FIRST FEMALE DIRECTOR INSIDE YOUR 2019 EDITION: ❱ A new concert hall for Liverpool ❱ The engineers of the future ❱ A bastion of digital tech ❱ CONTENTS 04 News Vice-Chancellor Professor Dame ALUMNI Janet Beer introduces a round-up 20 of campus news The most powerful 10 Class of 2018 woman in Welcoming more than 10,000 new British art graduates to the Class of 2018 How Liverpool shaped the path of Maria Balshaw 12 Making the law F Ecestiniti soluptate quod es voluptae. Offi ctis Harum quos CBE towards directorship 16 endignam facea qui blautIt’s es been maximin 125 years ullores since tibusam, the Liverpool comnia of the Tate galleries Navigating uncharteddollaccus exerunt. Law School was established. We and museums territory take a look at some of its greatest Three young entrepreneurs tell us achievements about their businesses, their Seismic events are by no motivations and how the Universitymeans feasibly19 predicted, IntoUniversity but n this issue we catch up with graduate Maria Balshaw helped them along the way Alumni volunteers have given their about her journey from Liverpool to the Tate; making steps towardstime to support such and enhancean the celebrate the 50th anniversary of the fi rst crossing of objective is imperativeexperiences of our students – here’s I how you can do the same the surface of the Arctic Ocean in which alumnus Dr Ken Hedges participated; and learn more about the new Digital Innovation Facility coming to Liverpool. 28 Class notes Thank you for all your feedback on last year’s magazine. What happened to your classmates Please do let us know what you think of this year’s edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Art Galleries Bugdet to the Art
    Manchester City Council Item 5 Art Galleries Committee 17 February 2016 Manchester City Council Report for Resolution Report to: Art Galleries Committee – 17 February 2016 Subject: Manchester City Galleries’ report and revenue budget 2016/17 Report of: Director of Manchester City Galleries and City Treasurer Summary This report details Manchester City Galleries’ performance during 2015/16, outlines how we plan to deliver our vision in 2016/17, and presents a draft revenue budget for 2016/17 for the approval of the Art Galleries Committee. Recommendations Members are recommended to: 1. Approve the contents of the report, including the draft gross budget for 2016/17 of £3.258m, with cash limit budget contribution from Manchester City Council of £2.065m. 2. Recommend the budget to Executive for approval as part of the Council’s budget setting process. 3. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive and City Treasurer to make any technical adjustments required to take account of the impact of changes in 2015/16 and 2016/17 budgets. Wards Affected: All Community Strategy Spine Summary of the contribution to the strategy Performance of the economy of This report sets out proposals for the delivery of a the region and sub region balanced budget for 2016/17. Reaching full potential in This service, along with all others in the education and employment directorate, aims to support individuals, families and communities achieve best outcomes. Individual and collective self Individual respect and community resilience is a esteem – mutual respect key theme within the Neighbourhood Focus Strategy to which City Galleries contribute. Neighbourhoods of Choice Creating sustainable neighbourhoods where people want to live, work and stay as they become more economically independent is key to Growth and Neighbourhoods’ budget strategy, towards which this budget contributes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Seminar 2011 Speakers
    5th Annual Seminar Tuesday 1 November 2011, 10.00 - 17.10 National Portrait Gallery, London Biographies of speakers and chairpersons Dr Maria Balshaw has been Director of the Whitworth Art Gallery since June 2006. She has coordinated a challenging programme of historic, modern and contemporary exhibitions that capitalise on the Whitworth’s university location as well as having a strong international profile. In 2011 she took on the role of Director of Manchester City Galleries alongside her duties at the Whitworth. This dual Directorship represents a unique partnership between the University of Manchester and Manchester City Council, bringing the two institutions and Manchester’s historic and modern art collections into complementary alliance for the first time in their history. Early career experience included working as Director of Development and External Relations at Arts Council: West Midlands and from 2002 – 2005 she was Director of Creative Partnerships: Birmingham. In 2004, Maria was selected as one of the inaugural Fellows for the Clore Cultural Leadership programme. Before moving into the cultural sector Maria worked as Research Fellow in Urban Culture at the University of Birmingham and as lecturer in Cultural Studies at University College Northampton. She published a number of books and essays on African-American urban culture, gender and visuality. Dr Rosalind Polly Blakesley is a Senior Lecturer in the History of Art and a Fellow of Pembroke College at the University of Cambridge. Her publications include Russian Art and the West (co-editor and contributor, 2007); The Arts and Crafts Movement (2006); An Imperial Collection: Women Artists from the State Hermitage Museum (co-editor and contributor, 2003); and Russian Genre Painting in the Nineteenth Century (under her maiden name of Rosalind P.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers of Surrealism, Issue 8, Spring 2010 1
    © Lizzie Thynne, 2010 Indirect Action: Politics and the Subversion of Identity in Claude Cahun and Marcel Moore’s Resistance to the Occupation of Jersey Lizzie Thynne Abstract This article explores how Claude Cahun and Marcel Moore translated the strategies of their artistic practice and pre-war involvement with the Surrealists and revolutionary politics into an ingenious counter-propaganda campaign against the German Occupation. Unlike some of their contemporaries such as Tristan Tzara and Louis Aragon who embraced Communist orthodoxy, the women refused to relinquish the radical relativism of their approach to gender, meaning and identity in resisting totalitarianism. Their campaign built on Cahun’s theorization of the concept of ‘indirect action’ in her 1934 essay, Place your Bets (Les paris sont ouvert), which defended surrealism in opposition to both the instrumentalization of art and myths of transcendence. An examination of Cahun’s post-war letters and the extant leaflets the women distributed in Jersey reveal how they appropriated and inverted Nazi discourse to promote defeatism through carnivalesque montage, black humour and the ludic voice of their adopted persona, the ‘Soldier without a Name.’ It is far from my intention to reproach those who left France at the time of the Occupation. But one must point out that Surrealism was entirely absent from the preoccupations of those who remained because it was no help whatsoever on an emotional or practical level in their struggles against the Nazis.1 Former dadaist and surrealist and close collaborator of André Breton, Tristan Tzara thus dismisses the idea that surrealism had any value in opposing Nazi domination.
    [Show full text]
  • 15Th Elia Biennial Conference Rotterdam 2018 Urbanism Education
    Programme 21-24 NOVEMBER 2018 15TH ELIA ART BIENNIAL CONFERENCE EDUCATION ROTTERDAM URBANISM 2018 WELCOME 3 - 5 3 DOWNLOAD THE WHOVA APP Welcome to the 15th ELIA Biennial Conference Welcome to Rotterdam 5 ROTTERDAM & VENUES 6 -11 AND JOIN THE 15TH ELIA The city of Rotterdam 6 Main conference venue: De Doelen 7 BIENNIAL CONFERENCE Maassilo 8 Blue City 8 Walhalla / Circus Rotjeknor / Codarts Circus Arts 8 WORM / TENT 8 Other venues 9 Map of Rotterdam 10 EVENT TIMETABLE 12 - 18 PLENARY SESSIONS 20 - 21 PANEL SESSION 22 - 25 MOBILE THEMATIC SESSIONS THURSDAY 22 NOVEMBER 26 - 33 MOBILE THEMATIC SESSIONS FRIDAY 23 NOVEMBER 34 - 41 MEMBERS’ EVENTS 42 - 47 Open Space 43 ELIA Afternoon 44 General Assembly 47 CULTURAL PROGRAMME 48 - 51 Institution tours 48 Exhibition Maaskant Award: alumni of Willem de Kooning Academy 50 Performance 50 Civic Reception 51 Closing Party 51 SPEAKERS BIOGRAPHIES 52 - 55 Berhanu Ashagrie 52 Maria Balshaw 53 Elizabeth Giorgis 54 Jeanette Winterson 55 PRACTICAL INFORMATION 57 Info point, internet, useful numbers 57 THE EVENT INVITATION CODE IS: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 58 - 59 ELIABIEN18 NOTES 60 - 67 WELCOME BY THE STEERING GROUP WELCOME TO THE 15TH ELIA BIENNIAL CONFERENCE RESILIENCE AND THE CITY: ART, EDUCATION, URBANISM The contrast between the famously elegant renaissance city of Florence in the heart of Italy where the previous ELIA Biennial Conference took place two years ago, and the reconstructed industrial, cultural and commercial city of Rotterdam could hardly be more extreme. Situated just half an hour away from the more famous capital city, Rotterdam’s gritty determination and confdence in confronting economic, social and cultural opportunities and challenges make it an ideal location for this year’s conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Essay 2
    Reflections on the Year 3 Project 1 Participation Begins With Me: Reflections From 2 Tate and School Headteachers on Year 3 David Parker with Kate Atkins, Maria Balshaw, Jackie Benjamin and Anna Cutler Reflections on the Year 3 Project This essay is one of nine commissioned by A New Direction to reflect on the Tate Year 3 Project and provoke thinking about future projects. For the full set go to www.anewdirection.org.uk/year-3-reflections Reflections on the Year 3 Project 2 David Parker David is a freelance researcher and evaluator with an interest in arts and creativity programmes for young people. Recent evaluations have focused on work for the British Council, Arts Council England and Sorrell Foundation. Formerly he was Director of Research for Creative and Cultural Skills, Creative Partnerships and the British Film Institute. Participation Begins With Me: Reflections From Tate and School Headteachers on Year 3 June In Conversation with... Kate Atkins Headteacher at Rosendale 2021 Primary School, Lambeth EDITED BY Naranee Ruthra-Rajan Dr Maria Balshaw CBE Director of Tate COPY EDITED BY Marina Lewis-King Jackie Benjamin, Head teacher at Tyssen The term Tate Year 3 Project Community School, Hackney in the first instance and Year 3 thereafter refers Anna Cutler to the whole project Director of Learning and latterly including planning and Director of Learning & Research production stages. at Tate (2010 - 2021) Steve McQueen Year 3 refers to the artwork and exhibition. For clarity, we have referred to the school year group of Year 3 as Y3. 2 Reflections on the Year 3 Project 3 Kate Atkins Jackie Benjamin, Headteacher at Rosendale Head teacher at Tyssen Primary School, Lambeth Community School, Hackney Kate has been teaching in Lambeth for Jackie has been teaching for over 20 over 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE 05 July 2018
    UNDER STRICT EMBARGO UNTIL THURSDAY 5 JULY AT 10.00PM PRESS RELEASE 05 July 2018 TATE ST IVES WINS £100,000 ART FUND MUSEUM OF THE YEAR 2018 This evening (5 July 2018), Tate St Ives was announced as Art Fund Museum of the Year 2018, the largest and most prestigious museum prize in the world. Anne Barlow, Director of Tate St Ives, was presented with the £100,000 prize by artist Isaac Julien and the ‘world’s best teacher’ Andria Zafirakou at an award ceremony at the V&A, London. The winner was chosen from five finalists: Brooklands Museum (Weybridge), Ferens Art Gallery (Hull), Glasgow Women’s Library, The Postal Museum (London) and Tate St Ives (Cornwall). Each of the other finalist museums received a £10,000 prize in recognition of their achievements. Among the 400 guests at the dinner hosted by Stephen Deuchar, director, Art Fund were: Artists: Ron Arad, David Batchelor, Mat Collishaw, Michael Craig-Martin, Roger Hiorns, Gary Hume, Chantal Joffe, Isaac Julien, Ben Langlands and Nikki Bell, Lawrence Lek, Peter Liversidge, Junko Mori, Humphrey Ocean, Cornelia Parker, Grayson Perry, Gerald Scarfe, Yinka Shonibare, Bob & Roberta Smith, Linder Sterling, Mitra Tabrizian, Gavin Turk, Gillian Wearing, Stephen Willats and Bill Woodrow. Arts leaders: Maria Balshaw, Peter Bazalgette, Iwona Blazwick, Nicholas Cullinan, Michael Ellis MP, Alex Farquharson, Gabriele Finaldi, Tristram Hunt, Jay Jopling, Diane Lees, Jonathan Marsden, Nick Merriman, Munira Mirza, Frances Morris, Maureen Paley, Axel Rüger, Ralph Rugoff, and Nicholas Serota. The biggest museum prize in the world, Art Fund Museum of the Year seeks out and celebrate innovation, imagination and exceptional achievement in museums and galleries across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Darbyshire
    Press Release MANCHESTER ART GALLERY TO PRESENT THE IMITATION GAME AN EXHIBITION OF WORK BY EIGHT INTERNATIONAL ARTISTS EXPLORING MACHINES AND THE IMITATION OF LIFE 13 FEBRUARY 2016 – 5 JUNE 2016 (L) Mari Velonaki, Fish-Bird, 2003-present. Courtesy the artist (R) James Capper, TELESTEP, 2015. Courtesy the artist, Hannah Barry Gallery, London and Paul Kasmin Gallery, New York SHOW TO INCLUDE VIDEO, SCULPTURE, PERFORMANCE AND INSTALLATION WORK BY ED ATKINS, JAMES CAPPER, PAUL GRANJON, TOVE KJELLMARK, LYNN HERSHMAN LEESON, DAVID LINK, MARI VELONAKI AND YU-CHEN WANG CURATED BY CLARE GANNAWAY The Imitation Game 13 February 2016 – 5 June 2016 Press view: 12 February 2016 I propose to consider the question, “Can machines think?... Are there imaginable digital computers that would do well in the imitation game?” Alan Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence, 1950 In February 2016, Manchester Art Gallery will present The Imitation Game, an exhibition by eight international contemporary artists who explore the theme of machines and the imitation of life. The exhibition will include work by artists Ed Atkins, James Capper, Paul Granjon, Tove Kjellmark, Lynn Hershman Leeson, David Link, Mari Velonaki and Yu-Chen Wang. With a title inspired by Alan Turing’s ‘Turing Test’, devised to test a computer’s ability to imitate human thought, introduced in an article while he was working at The University of Manchester, The Imitation Game will include three new commissions and works never before seen in the UK. Manchester has a rich history of computer science, as the birthplace of the industrial machine- age, where the world’s first stored-program computer was developed.
    [Show full text]