DOCSLIB.ORG

The Portfolio Budget Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Portfolio Budget Statements THE PORTFOLIO BUDGET STATEMENTS 2008-2009 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION PORTFOLIO BUDGET INITIATIVES AND EXPLANATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS SPECIFIED BY OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS BY AGENCY President Litokwa Tomeing President of the Republic RMI The Honorable Jurelanj Zedkaia Speaker of the Nitijela RMI Dear Mr. President Dear Mr. Speaker I hereby submit Portfolio Budget Statements in support of the FY09 Budget for the Ministry of Education Portfolio. These statements have been developed, and are submitted to the Nitijela, as a statement on the outcomes for the portfolio. They also cover the purpose of portfolio budget measures. I present these statements by virtue of my Ministerial responsibility for accountability to the Nitijela and, through it, the public. Yours sincerely Nidel Lorak Minister of Education MOE FY09 Portfolio Budget Document Page 1 Table of Contents – Ministry of Education Portfolio A. Introduction 3 B. Portfolio Overview 4 I. The Role of the Ministry of Education 4 II. Current Situation 4 III. Strategic Plan 4 IV. Policy Focus 5 V. Reporting 5 VI. Structure of the Education Portfolio and Breakdown of Appropriations 5 C. Agency Budget Statements 13 I. Performance Information by Objective Area, Outcomes and Output Groups 13 II. Annual Performance Measures for MOE Outcomes 13 III. Objective Area: Staff and Human Resource Development 23 A. Outcome 1: To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of MOE staff through the provision of budget, finance and HR development 23 IV. Objective Area: Curriculum Development and Assessment 28 A. Outcome 2: Improve education results in the RMI through research, testing, data management, and IT services 28 V. Objective Area: Infrastructure and Maintenance 36 A. Outcome 3: Provide property maintenance services to all schools and administration building and coordinate expanded community role for school maintenance and upkeep. 36 VI. Objective Area: Program Delivery and Student Services 39 A. Outcome 4: To provide access and improve student performance and learning outcomes at early childhood and primary levels 39 VII. Objective Area: Program Delivery and Student Services 45 A. Outcome 5: To provide access and improve student performance and learning outcomes at the secondary level 45 VIII. Objective Area: Program Delivery and Student Services 52 A. Outcome 6: To vocationalize the RMI curriculum 52 IX. Objective Area: Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment 54 A. Outcome 7: To continue to improve the effectiveness of classroom instruction through improved curriculum, testing and teacher program delivery 54 X. Objective Area: Program Delivery and Student Services 60 A. Outcome 8: To improve service delivery and learning outcomes by addressing the special needs of the students on Kwajalein atoll 60 XI. Objective Area: Program Delivery and Student Services 64 A. Outcome 9: To address the needs of special education students 64 XII. Line Item Budget by Funding Type MOE FY09 66 D. National Scholarship Board (MISGLB) 68 I. Overview 68 II. Performance Information for NSB 68 III. Primary Measures for NSB 69 IV. NSB Objective Area: Scholarships 70 V. Adjustments to FY09 Performance Information 72 VI. Line Item Budget by Funding Type NSB FY09 72 E. National Training Council (NTC) 74 l. Overview 74 II. Performance Information for NTC 74 VI. Primary Measures for NTC 75 IV. Objective Area: Training Programs 76 V. Adjustments to FY09 Performance Information 78 VI. Line Item Budget by Source NTC FY09 78 02/27/09 MOE FY09 Portfolio Budget Document Page 2 F. Supplemental Education Grant FY08 79 I. Overview 79 II. Objective Area: Supplemental Education Grant 79 G. Ebeye Special Needs 88 I. Overview 88 II. Objective Area: Ebeye Special Needs Programs 88 H. College of the Marshall Islands 89 l. Overview 89 II. Performance Information for CMI 89 III. Primary Measures for CMI 91 IV. Objective Area: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness (CMI Outcome 1) 100 V. Objective Area: Student Learning Programs and Services (CMI Outcome 2) 105 VI. Objective Area: Resources (CMI Outcome 3) 114 VII. Objective Area: Leadership and Governance (CMI Outcome 4) 119 VIII. Objective Area: Quality of Life (CMI Outcome 5) 121 IX. Adjustments to FY09 Performance Information 123 X. Line Item Budget by Source CMI FY09 123 02/27/09 MOE FY09 Portfolio Budget Document Page 3 A. Introduction The purpose of the Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) is to inform the Nitijela of the reasons for inclusion of proposed provisions in the Appropriation Bill(s). The role of the PBS is to explain requests for funds through the Budget Appropriation Bill(s). The PBS provides sufficient information, explanation and justification to enable the Nitijela to understand the purpose of each item in the Bill(s) and the accrual budgets of the Portfolio. Document Structure The PBS is presented in three sections: Section A- User Guide The User guide provides information regarding using the PBS Section B - Portfolio Overview The Portfolio Overview explains the role, mission and the goals of the organisations within the portfolio. It provides an overview of: The role/mission of the portfolio, including the structure of the portfolio, Structure of Ministry of Education Objective Areas and Outcomes Breakdown of Funding by Source, Objective Area and Outcomes Section C - Agency Budget Statements This section provides the following information: MOE Budget Statements Agency Overview, Appropriations and Budget Measures Summary – Details regarding the link between the resources appropriated and application to Objective Areas and achievement of outcomes/outputs. Objective Areas, Planned Outcomes and Outputs Information – Performance information on the planned outcomes and the contributing administered items and agency outputs. Enquiries The contact officer regarding enquiries to this Portfolio is: Biram Stege Secretary, Ministry of Education P.O. Box 3 Majuro, MH 96960 625-5261 02/27/09 MOE FY09 Portfolio Budget Document Page 4 B. Portfolio Overview This section provides information on the Role of the Ministry of Education, the current situation and policy focus. I. The Role of the Ministry of Education The principal matters dealt with by the Ministry of Education Portfolio in the Education Act of 1991 are: To develop policies on education in the Republic To ensure that appropriate courses and tuition are available to students To ensure appropriate standards of teaching in all educational institutions To encourage the teaching of the Marshallese language and culture To seek and coordinate scholarships abroad for Marshallese citizens II. Current Situation The Ministry of Education plays a key role in assisting the Government in achieving its policy objectives concerning education of its peoples. Since its formation MOE has committed to becoming a High Performance Organization, characterized by: A focus on the students Continuous improvement: a performance driven organization, seeking to produce better outcomes People and systems that are flexible and creative Top quality products or outcomes To carry out these responsibilities the Ministry has been reorganized into the following Functional Divisions: Administration, Finance and Human Resources Policy, Planning, Research and Information Technology Property and Support Services Early Childhood and Elementary Education Secondary Education Technical Education and Assessment Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Kwajalein Atoll Education Special Education III. Strategic Plan A MOE Strategic Plan 2008-2011 was drafted in November 2006 and was finalized in December 2007. The plan was approved by Cabinet in April 2008. The foundation of the plan is the reorganization of the structure of MOE so that a greater emphasis on performance and program delivery is embraced. The following is the summary introduction of the Strategic Plan. Summary of the Strategic Plan Development Process This Strategic Plan (2009- 2011) is a continuance of the last Five Year Strategic, and is designed as a 3 year rolling plan. In the process of completing this plan, specific activities were undertaken. The first stage was to review the previous five-year plan in order to ascertain the level of achievement to date. This review was carried out in two parts, a review of all necessary documentation as well as interviewing key personnel within and outside the Ministry. These interviews and the review of documentation formed the basis for the final recommendations regarding completion of the previous five-year plan. The next stage was conducting extensive stakeholder consultations in Majuro, Ebeye and Jaluit, which included members of the private sector, local teachers and students, parent groups, Principals and NGO’s. The main objective for these varied consultations was to ensure all Ministry and non Ministry stakeholders would be able to express their views, which were subsequently incorporated into the Strategic Plan. A 02/27/09 MOE FY09 Portfolio Budget Document Page 5 draft document was reviewed by the Strategic Plan Steering Committee with the approval of the Strategic Plan in April of 2008. The adoption of Performance Budgeting by MOE made it critical that the new plan complements and be organized into the Annual Performance Budget Portfolio. While the FY08 Portfolio was substantially completed prior to the Strategic Plan, the plan was linked with the FY08 budget and is now guiding the direction of this and future Portfolio budgets. While the Policy statements outlined in this plan are directly derived from the consultations with the various
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skills Training and Vocational Education Project
    Completion Report Project Number: 33166 Loan Number: 1791 November 2006 The Marshall Islands: Skills Training and Vocational Education Project Asian Development Bank CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS The currency unit of the Republic of the Marshall Islands is the US dollar. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CMI – College of the Marshall Islands EA – executing agency IDMP – Infrastructure Development and Maintenance Project JHS – Jaluit High School MIA – Ministry of Internal Affairs MIHS – Marshall Islands High School (Majuro) MIS – management information system MOE – Ministry of Education NGO – nongovernment organization NIHS – Northern Islands High School (Wotje) NTC – National Training Council NVTI – National Vocational Training Institute PIU – project implementation unit PSC – project steering committee RMI – Republic of the Marshall Islands SDR – special drawing rights SEG – supplementary education grant TA – technical assistance TOR – terms of reference WAM – Waan Aelon in Majel WIA – Work Investment Act WIB – Work Investment Board WTMIC – Women’s Training and Marketing Center NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Vice President C.L. Greenwood, Operations 2 Director General P. Erquiaga, Pacific Department Director I. Bhushan, Area B, Pacific Department Team leader S. Pollard, Principal Programs Coordination Specialist, Pacific Department Team member J. Sarvi, Principal Education Specialist, Pacific Department A. Salvador, Associate Project Analyst, Pacific Department CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 1 B. Project Outputs 2 C. Project Cost and Financial Plan 8 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Yearbook, 2017
    REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS STATISTICAL YEAR BOOK 2017 Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO) Office of the President Republic of the Marshall Islands RMI Statistical Yearbook, 2017 Statistical Yearbook 2017 Published by: Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO), Office of the President, Republic of the Marshall Islands Publication Year: June, 2018 Technical support was provided by Inclusive Growth Thematic cluster, UNDP, Pacific Office, Suva, Fiji Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNDP or EPPSO. The pictures used in this publication are mostly taken from the Google search and some from the respective organization’s websites. EPPSO is not responsible if there is any violation of “copy right” issue related with any of them. 1 RMI Statistical Yearbook, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 5 FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 7 SUGGESTED NOTES PRIOR TO READING THIS PUBLICATION .......................................................... 10 BRIEF HISTORY OF REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS ............................................................. 12 REPUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • The Portfolio Budget Statements
    THE PORTFOLIO BUDGET STATEMENTS 2007-2008 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION PORTFOLIO BUDGET INITIATIVES AND EXPLANATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS SPECIFIED BY OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS BY AGENCY President Kessai H Note President of the Republic RMI The Hon Litokwa Tomeing Speaker of the Nitijela RMI Dear Mr. President Dear Mr. Speaker I hereby submit Portfolio Budget Statements in support of the FY08 Budget for the Ministry of Education Portfolio. These statements have been developed, and are submitted to the Nitijela, as a statement on the outcomes for the portfolio. They also cover the purpose of portfolio budget measures. I present these statements by virtue of my Ministerial responsibility for accountability to the Nitijela and, through it, the public. Yours sincerely Wilfred I. Kendall Minister of Education MOE FY08 Portfolio Budget Document Page i Table of Contents – Ministry of Education Portfolio A. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................1 B. PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................................................2 I. The Role of the Ministry of Education.................................................................................................................2 II. Current Situation...................................................................................................................................................2 III. Strategic Plan
    [Show full text]
  • RMI Education and Skills Strengthening Project
    1 RMI Education and Skills Strengthening Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN National Training Council and Public Schools System as Implementing Agencies supported by the Centralized Support Unit of the Division of International Development Assistance. Public Disclosure Authorized 1 VERSION 3 20 September 2020 WORLD BANK RMI EDUCATION AND SKILLS STRENGTHENING PROJECT Stakeholder Engagement Plan and Grievance Redress Mechanism technical and vocational education and training (TVET) opportunities, and improve labor market outcomes for Marshallese residing in the RMI and abroad. The project is expected to bring about significant social and economic benefits by lifting the educational outcomes of young Marshallese to effectively engage and contribute to the workforce in RMI and abroad. The ESSP will also reduce gender gaps in TVET participation and increase the availability of technical skills in vulnerable outer island communities. Secondary benefits will accrue by reducing urban migration through expanding training and livelihood options in the outer islands, and by decreasing the need for the private sector to import skilled and semi-skilled workers 1.2. Stakeholder Engagement Plan Pursuant to the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Framework (ESF), as set out in Environmental and Social Standard 10 (ESS10), this Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) was prepared in view of the nature and scope of planned activities, with due consideration to expected impacts and potential risks . The purpose of the SEP is to ensure appropriate stakeholder consultation, participation and information sharing at all levels - including project sites and communities, with the goal of supporting ESSP decision- making and implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Bravo
    Defense Threat Reduction Agency Defense Threat Reduction Information Analysis Center 1680 Texas Street SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5669 DTRIAC SR-12-001 CASTLE BRAVO: FIFTY YEARS OF LEGEND AND LORE A Guide to Off-Site Radiation Exposures January 2013 Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Trade Names Statement: The use of trade names in this document does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial hardware or software. This document may not be cited for purposes of advertisement. REPORT Authored by: Thomas Kunkle Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico and Byron Ristvet Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Albuquerque, New Mexico SPECIAL Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Islands Chronology: 1944-1981
    b , KARSHALL ISLANDS CHRONOLOGY - ERRATUM SHEET Page 12. column 1 and 2. “1955 - March 9 United Xations. .‘I and “May Enewetak . .” This should read. L956 - IMarch 9 United Nations..,“and IMay Enewetak .--*‘ Marshal ACHRONOLOGY: 1944-1981 LISRARY - ~ASHINCTGN, D.C. 2054-5 MICRONESIA SUPPORT COMlITTEE Honolulu, Hawalt F- ‘ifm ti R.EAD TICS ~RO?OLOGY: Weapons Testim--even numbered left hand pages 4-34; destruction of island home- Lands and radioactive wntamination of people, land and food sources. Resettlement of People--odd numbered right hand pages 5-39; the struggle to survive in exile. There is some necessary overlap for clarity; a list of sources used concludes the Chronology on pages 36 and 38. BIKINI ATOLL IN 1946, PRIOR TO THE START OF THE NUCLEAR TESTS. 1st edition publishe'dJuly 1978 2nd edition published August 1981 “?aRTlEGooDoFM ANKlND..~ Marshall Islands people have borne the brunt of U.S. military activity in Micronesia, from nuclear weapons experiments and missile testing to relocations of people and radio- active contamination of people and their environment. All, as an American military com- mder said of the Bikini teats, “for the good of mankind and to end all world wars.” Of eleven United Nations Trusteeships created after World War II, only Micronesia was designated a “strategic” trust, reflecting its military importance to the United States. Ihe U.N. agreement haa allowed the U.S. to use the islands for military purposes, while binding the U.S. to advance the well being of the people of Micronesia. Western nuclear powers have looked on the Pacific, because of its small isolated popu- lations, aa an “ideal” location to conduct nuclear activities unwanted In their own countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Responsibility for Our Schools: a Series of Four Articles on Education in Micronesia. INSTITUTION Pacific Resources for Education and Learning, Honolulu, HI
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 467 541 RC 023 666 AUTHOR Hezel, Francis X. TITLE Taking Responsibility for Our Schools: A Series of Four Articles on Education in Micronesia. INSTITUTION Pacific Resources for Education and Learning, Honolulu, HI. Region XV Comprehensive Assistance Center. SPONS AGENCY Department of Education, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-06-00 NOTE 49p.; Introduction by Hilda C. Heine. CONTRACT S283A950001 PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; Brain Drain; Community Involvement; Education Work Relationship; Educational Change; *Educational Objectives; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; *Pacific Islanders; Parent Participation; *Role of Education; *School Community Relationship; School Culture; *School Effectiveness IDENTIFIERS Exemplary Schools; *Federated States of Micronesia; Marshall Islands; Palau ABSTRACT Mobilizing communities to support educational improvements is one of the challenges confronting educators in the Freely Associated States (FAS), which consists of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau. This booklet aims to establish a consensus on broad educational goals and to rebuild the sense of community ownership of schools that is missing today. "What Should Our Schools Be Doing?" describes conflicting views about whether education should provide for manpower training, cultural preservation, or academic skills, given the current poor academic achievement in the FAS and high rates of emigration to find work. It is suggested that a new education system can accommodate all three visions. "How Good Are Our Schools?" attempts to show the current status of schooling in each country but is hampered by incomplete data. Although test scores are the only data consistently available, there are other measures for school success.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM MICRONESIA Republic of the Marshall Islands El Nino Drought Response
    IOM MICRONESIA Republic of the Marshall Islands El Nino Drought Response SITUATION REPORT #10 7 November 2016 Supplemental Food Assistance and Non Food Item Distribution © IOM 2016 (IOM Majuro) New Zealand Embassy Supports Rainwater Harvesting Improvement Project in Kabin Meto (Ujae, Lae, Wotho) Through generous donations from the New Zealand Embassy, and in coordination with the Office of the Chief Secretary, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Rainwater Harvesting Improvement Program (RWHIP) is near completion. The overall objective of the RWHIP is to improve and expand the use of rainwater harvesting systems in order to provide relief to households during times of drought while also providing a long-term, sustainable source of water collection that extends beyond times of disaster. During prolonged periods of drought there is a common misconception that there is no rain at all. This is not true as there is often some rain—though at rates that are well below average. It is rare for a location in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) to have no rainfall for one month or more. It is for this reason that the RMI WASH Cluster has decided to create and implement the RWHIP. The Program is part of a well rounded and holistic approach to ensuring that vulnerable communities have access to water at all times—including during periods of drought. The 3 RWHIP teams were composed of staff from IOM, Volunteers from the Marshall Islands Red Cross Society (MIRCS), staff from Ministry of Public Works and local community members. Teams are wrapping up final installations and returning to Majuro to debrief.
    [Show full text]
  • CMI Fact Book 2014 FINAL 11132014
    2 Fact Book 0 1 4 Table of Contents Notes and Table Descriptions ------------------------------------------------------ 3 About CMI --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Mission, Vision & Philosophy ------------------------------------------------------- 6 Core Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 ILOs and Programs ---------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Governing Bodies ------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society -----------------------------------------------------11 Student Enrollment ---------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Student Demographic Profile ------------------------------------------------------ 13 Student Enrolment Profile --------------------------------------------------------- 14 New Students Enrollment ---------------------------------------------------------- 16 New Students Demographic Profile------------------------------------------------ 17 New Students Enrolment Profile --------------------------------------------------- 18 Placement Test ------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 Student success ------------------------------------------------------------------ 27 Credit Production ----------------------------------------------------------------- 29 Retention ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 Graduation ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Health Data Report 2011
    Ministry of health Republic of the Marshall Islands “KUMITI EJMUUR" ANNUAL REPORT Fy 2011 1 2 3 4 Joint Message from the Minister and Secretary of Health We are pleased to present the Annual Report for the Ministry of Health for Fiscal Year 2011. Although there is so much data and statistics collected for every single program and services in the Ministry, this report is presented for a better understanding of the type of resources allocated for the Ministry such as human and financial resources, and the utilizations of its resources or expenditures incurred during the fiscal year. Section on data and vital statistics presents the health status of RMI in terms of morbidity and mortality just for that fiscal year. Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) or lifestyles diseases, tuberculosis and leprosy remain the three prioritized areas, and update on activities and data are included in this report. The last section is the Cost Analysis and Expenditures for the fiscal year in selected areas or services. It is important to note that actual costs of services provided by the Ministry are not charged accordingly. If the Ministry was to charge patients according to the costs of services, high revenues will be generated every fiscal year. Because of the high rates of lifestyles diseases or chronic diseases and identified communicable diseases, the Ministry continues to shift its focus on preventive or primary health care’s services in compliance with the Declaration of Primary Health Care by World Health Organization (WHO) on September 12, 1978 in Alma Ata. The Declaration called for urgent action by all governments, all health and development entities and the world community to protect and promote quality health practices for all peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • USAKA Temporary Extended Test Range EA S-1
    Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The U.S. Army Space and Strategic Defense Command, as the executing agent for the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, is the management office for the U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll (USAKA) temporary extended test range program. The proposed program is to launch up to eight liquid and/or solid propellant target tactical ballistic missiles from Bigen Island, Aur Atoll toward the USAKA. The purpose of these Theater Missile Defense (TMD) flight test experiments is to obtain sensor data on target tactical ballistic missiles with a range of 350 to 500 kilometers (220 to 310 miles) toward the USAKA over the next 5 years. TMD interceptors will be launched to intercept the target tactical ballistic missiles to demonstrate the feasibility of TMD intercepts. A variety of ground, ship, air, and satellite sensors would gather data on the flight test experiments. The flight tests would involve target missile launches from Bigen Island, Aur Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), with interceptor launches from the USAKA. An agreement to use Bigen Island as an additional defense site (including use as a temporary launch site) was negotiated with landowners and the RMI. This agreement will remain in effect for the life of the Compact of Free Association Act of 1985. Test Program Activities The proposed program activities would include transport of the target missiles from storage in the continental United States to Meck Island in the USAKA and then to Bigen Island within Aur Atoll for launch. No facility construction or modification on Meck Island is anticipated to support assembly and pre-flight checkout of a solid-propellant missile system.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1.1 GEOGRAPHY of the MARSHALL ISLANDS. Approxi- Area Mate No. (Square Miles) Latitude Longitude Name Type of Islets
    Table 1.1 GEOGRAPHY OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS. Approxi- Area mate No. (square miles) Latitude Longitude Name Type of Islets Lagoon Dry Land (Deg. Min.) (Deg. Min.) Marshall Islands 1,225 4,506.87 70.05 4 34' - 14 42' 160 47' - 172 10' Ratak Chain 641 1672.52 34.02 5 53' - 14 42' 168 53' - 172 10' 1 Bokak Atoll 10 30.13 1.25 14 32' - 14 42' 168 53' - 169 1' 2 Bikar Atoll 7 14.44 0.19 12 11' - 12 18' 170 4' - 170 9' 3 Utrok Atoll 10 22.29 0.94 11 12' - 11 12' 169 45' - 169 51' 4 Toke Atoll 6 35.96 0.22 11 5' - 11 30' 169 33' - 169 40' 5 Mejit Island 1 _ 0.72 10 16' - 10 18' 170 52' - 70 53' 6 Ailuk Atoll 55 68.47 2.07 10 12' - 10 27' 169 52' - 169 59' 7 Jemo Island 1 _ 0.06 10 7' 169 33' 8 Likiep Atoll 65 163.71 3.96 9 48' - 10 4' 168 58' - 169 20' 9 Wotje Atoll 75 241.06 3.16 9 21' - 9 32' 169 48' - 170 15' 10 Erkub Atoll 16 88.92 0.59 9 8' 170 0' 11 Maloelap Atoll 75 375.57 3.79 8 29' - 8 55' 170 50' - 171 15' 12 Aur Atoll 43 92.58 2.17 8 7' - 8 22' 171 1' - 171 12' 13 Majuro Atoll 64 113.92 3.75 7 3' - 7 13' 171 2' - 171 58' 14 Arno Atoll 103 130.77 5.00 6 58' - 7 18' 171 33' - 171 57' 15 Mili Atoll 92 294.70 6.15 5 53' - 6 16' 171 42' - 172 10' 16 Nadikdik Atoll 18 _ _ _ _ _ _ Ralik Chain 584 2834.35 36.03 4 34' - 11 42' 160 47' - 169 44' 17 Enewetak Atoll 44 387.99 2.26 11 20' - 11 41' 162 17' - 162 24' 18 Ujelang Atoll 30 25.47 0.67 9 46' - 9 53' 160 47' - 161 0' 19 Bikini Atoll 36 229.40 2.32 11 29' - 11 42' 165 12' - 165 34' 20 Rongdrik Atoll 14 55.38 0.65 11 15' - 11 25' 167 22' - 167 32' 21 Ronglap Atoll 61 387.77 3.07 11 9' - 11
    [Show full text]