DRI3000 Status and Discussion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DRI3000 Status and Discussion DRI3000 Status and Discussion Keith Packard Intel Open Source Technology Center [email protected] Discussion Areas ● DRI3 design and status ● Present status ● Synchronization between X and DRM ● Present Redirection DRI3 Requirements ● Share DMA bufs as X pixmaps ● Share synchronization objects ● Provide access to correct DRM device DRI3 Status ● Finished – X Protocol, XCB binding – Mesa DRI3 loader, GLX API – X server – Intel Mesa and 2D driver ● To Do – EGL API – X server GL loader ● Needs more test cases DRI3 Extension ● Open – X server opens DRM device – Prepares for rendering – Passes resulting FD back to client – Can transparently c!ange to using Render "odes ● Pix#apFro#$uffer – Client creates DRM ob%ect – Maps to DM&$uf – Passes DM&$uf FD to X server – X server creates pixmap referencing sa#e DRM ob%ect ● $ufferFro#Pix#ap – X server #aps Pixmap DRM ob%ect to DM&$uf – Passes DM&$uf FD to client – Client unwraps DM&$uf to get DRM ob%ect ● FenceFro#FD – Client allocates anon #ous file 'it! a single page containing futex – Passes FD to X server – X server #aps (le and creates an XSyncFence ob%ect pointing at it* Present Extension ● PresentPixmap – Provide ne' content for windo' in a pixmap ● PresentNotifyMSC – Returns current media counters in an event ● PresentSelectInput – )elects for Present events ● PresentIdle"otify – Event sent w!en pixmap is free for re+use ● PresentCon(gure"otify – Event sent w!en 'indow si,e changes ● PresentComplete"otify – Event sent w!en PresentRegion operation completes PresentPixmap ● Para#eters- – serial – client+provided nu#ber returned in matc!ing PresentCo#plete"otif – valid+area – Region of pix#ap containing correct pixels – update+area – Region of pix#ap containing c!anged pixels – x+off, y+off – offset wit!in windo' for operation – 'ait+fence – S ncFence w!ic! blocks execution – options – Set of flags to control execution – target+#sc, divisor, re#ainder – para#eters de(ning displa time – options – cut+t!roug!, force cop – 1ist of windo'/serial to notif ● )upports vblank sync!ronized sub-window updates* ● &llow flips even for s#all updates ● )eparate out completion event from buffer idle event Previous “PresentRegion” ● 5!at's in git toda ● "o 6wait_fence6 – Re8uires i#plicit s nc!roni,ation bet'een DRM client and X server ● 'idle7fence6 – )ee discussion on dealing 'it! idle buffers ● "o options – force applications to support 0ipping ● "o list of windo'2serial for noti(cation – "eeded for redirection XCB changes ● FD passing – use recv#sg ever '!ere – Stick incoming Fds in reply structure ● 3Special” event 8ueues – Split off Present events to special queue – Bu#p pointer to integer to make c!ecking for events c!eap (and Mesa compatible) Media Stream Counters ● Monotonic fra#e counter ● C!allenges- – )'itc!ing monitors – DPM) off – )uspend2resu#e – ;< s'itc! ● Current design – Pick a counter for eac! 'indo' – Create a fake counter as needed – Per+'indo' counter is offset fro# underl ing counter – Counters ad%usted on transition ● Not 'orking 'it! DPM)2suspend et – events 8ueued to kernel never !appen – redesign to ignore 8ueued events ● Ho' fast s!ould t!e fake counter run> – <!inking about ?=,> Present Status ● First protocol version finished – Initial protocol, XCB and Xlib bindings – Mesa loader, GLX API, various GL/GLX extensions – X server DIX – Intel Mesa, 2D driver ● Second protocol proposal – Adds wait-fence – Adds options ● To Do – Add more synchronization – Add redirect – Think about YUV? DRM SyncFences ● Currently implemented with futexes – X/DRM details are hidden in video driver ● Not select/poll friendly – X server cannot be awoken when fence is signaled via futex API. SyncFence adventures ● Original design included per-pixmap idle fence ● Client wants to wait for any idle fence ● Current implementation guesses which is likely to become idle. ● Can cause deadlocks ● Need to wait for one of a set of fences somehow ● Plan to use events instead of fences Present Redirection ● Busy implementing simplest possible plan – Effectively forward PresentPixmap request and let compositor sort it out. ● Want more complicated mechanism (I think) – Over-allocate to page-align – What about auto-painting window manager frames? .
Recommended publications
  • High Speed Visualization in the Jetos Aviation Operating System Using Hardware Acceleration*
    High Speed Visualization in the JetOS Aviation Operating System Using Hardware Acceleration* Boris Barladian[0000-0002-2391-2067], Nikolay Deryabin[0000-0003-1248-6047], Alexey Voloboy[0000-0003-1252-8294], Vladimir Galaktionov[0000-0001-6460-7539], and Lev Shapiro[0000-0002-6350-851X] The Keldysh Institute of the Applied Mathematics of RAS, Moscow, Russia [email protected],{voloboy, vlgal, pls}@gin.keldysh.ru Abstract. The paper discusses details of the pilot display visualization that uses the hardware acceleration capabilities of the Vivante graphics processor in the JetOS aviation operating system. Previously the OpenGL Safety Critical library was implemented without hardware acceleration. This was done in such a way because software library is easier to certify in accordance with the avionics re- quirements. But usage of the software OpenGL does not provide acceptable visualization speed for modern Flight Display and 3D relief applications. So more complex visualization approach utilized the GPU acceleration capabilities was elaborated. Although the OpenGL library was implemented for a specific GPU and took into account its specificity, the described approach to adapt the MESA open source library can be used for other GPUs. An effective algorithm for multi-window visualization using the implemented library with hardware acceleration is present. The described approach allows you to achieve the visu- alization speed acceptable for the pilot display of the aircraft. Keywords: Pilot Display, Embedded Systems, Real-time Operating System, OpenGL Safety Critical, Multi-windowing. 1 Introduction In [1] requirements were formulated for a real-time operating system (RTOS) de- signed to work with integrated modular avionics. In particular, the RTOS should comply with the ARINC 653 standard [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Porting Tizen-IVI 3.0 to an ARM Based Soc Platform
    Porting Tizen-IVI 3.0 to an ARM based SoC Platform Damian Hobson-Garcia Automotive Linux Summit July 1-2, 2014 Tokyo, Japan Tizen IVI support Until recently… Intel architecture (x86) system – Tizen IVI 2.0alpha, Tizen IVI 3.0 ARM architecture based system – Tizen IVI 2.0alpha (ivi-panda) Need to port Tizen IVI 3.0 to ARM ourselves Current State of Affairs Intel architecture (x86) system – Tizen IVI 2.0alpha, Tizen IVI 3.0 – Tizen Common NEW ARM architecture based system – Tizen IVI 2.0alpha (ivi-panda) – Tizen Common NEW Tizen IVI now based on Tizen Common – Lots of reuse Target Platform Renesas R-Car Gen2 series platform R-Car M2 – ARM Cortex A15 x2 R-Car H2 – ARM Cortex A15 x4, + ARM Cortex A7 x4 (option) 3D Graphics System – Imagination Technologies PowerVR series On board IP blocks – H/W video decode/encode – image processing Agenda Objective Methodology Porting Tasks – Weston/Wayland Integration – WebKit Integration – GStreamer Integration Objective Tizen IVI 3.0 on R-Car M2/H2 1. Standard Native Applications – Terminal program – Open GL/ES applications 2. Web – Browser and web applications 3. Multimedia – Video playback (1080p @ 30fps) Local Build Methodology Tizen IVI 3.0 milestone releases we used: – M2-Sep (released Oct 11, 2013) – M2-EOY (released Jan 15, 2014) – M2-March2014 (released April 11, 2014) Non-hardware dependant packages – Rebuild for ARM instruction set Hardware dependant packages – Replace/update with R-Car M2/H2 support Tizen Common/IVI Rebase Methodology Reuse Tizen Common ARM support for Tizen
    [Show full text]
  • SUSE® Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 and the Workstation Extension: What's New ?
    SUSE® Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 and the Workstation Extension: What's New ? Frédéric Crozat <[email protected]> Enterprise Desktop Release Manager Scott Reeves <[email protected]> Enterprise Desktop Development Manager Agenda • Design Criteria • Desktop Environment in SUSE Linux Enterprise 12 • GNOME Shell • Desktop Features and Applications 2 Design Criteria SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop Interoperability Ease of Use Security Ease of Management Lower Costs 4 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 • Focus on technical workstation ‒ Developers and System administrators • One tool for the job • Main desktop applications will be shipped: ‒ Mail client, Office Suite, Graphical Editors, ... • SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension ‒ Extend SUSE Linux Enterprise Server with packages only available on SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop. (x86-64 only) 5 Desktop in SUSE Linux Enterprise 12 As Part of the Common Code Base SUSE Linux Enterprise 12 Desktop Environment • SUSE Linux Enterprise 12 contains one primary desktop environment • Additional light-weight environment for special use-cases: ‒ Integrated Systems • Desktop environment is shared between the server and desktop products 7 SUSE Linux Enterprise 12 Desktop Environment • GNOME 3 is the main desktop environment ‒ SLE Classic mode by default ‒ GNOME 3 Classic Mode and GNOME 3 Shell Mode also available • SUSE Linux Enterprise 12 ships also lightweight IceWM ‒ Targeted at Integrated Systems • QT fully supported: ‒ QT5 supported for entire SLE12 lifecycle ‒ QT4 supported, will be removed in future
    [Show full text]
  • The Linux Graphics Stack Attributions
    I - Hardware : Anatomy of a GPU II - Host : The Linux graphics stack Attributions Introduction to GPUs and to the Linux Graphics Stack Martin Peres CC By-SA 3.0 Nouveau developer Ph.D. student at LaBRI November 26, 2012 1 / 36 I - Hardware : Anatomy of a GPU II - Host : The Linux graphics stack Attributions General overview Outline 1 I - Hardware : Anatomy of a GPU General overview Driving screens Host < − > GPU communication 2 II - Host : The Linux graphics stack General overview DRM and libdrm Mesa X11 Wayland X11 vs Wayland 3 Attributions Attributions 2 / 36 I - Hardware : Anatomy of a GPU II - Host : The Linux graphics stack Attributions General overview General overview of a modern GPU's functions Display content on a screen Accelerate 2D operations Accelerate 3D operations Decode videos Accelerate scientific calculations 3 / 36 I - Hardware : Anatomy of a GPU II - Host : The Linux graphics stack Attributions General overview CPU Clock Front-side Graphics Generator bus card slot Chipset Memory Slots High-speed graphics bus (AGP or PCI Northbridge Memory Express) bus (memory controller hub) Internal Bus PCI Bus Onboard Southbridge graphics PCI (I/O controller controller Bus hub) IDE SATA USB Cables and Ethernet ports leading Audio Codec CMOS Memory off-board PCI Slots LPC Bus Super I/O Serial Port Parallel Port Flash ROM Floppy Disk Keyboard (BIOS) Mouse 4 / 36 I - Hardware : Anatomy of a GPU II - Host : The Linux graphics stack Attributions General overview Hardware architecture GPU: Where all the calculations are made VRAM: Stores
    [Show full text]
  • Release Notes for Xfree86® 4.8.0 the Xfree86 Project, Inc December 2008
    Release Notes for XFree86® 4.8.0 The XFree86 Project, Inc December 2008 Abstract This document contains information about the various features and their current sta- tus in the XFree86 4.8.0 release. 1. Introduction to the 4.x Release Series XFree86 4.0 was the first official release of the XFree86 4 series. The current release (4.8.0) is the latest in that series. The XFree86 4.x series represents a significant redesign of the XFree86 X server,with a strong focus on modularity and configurability. 2. Configuration: aQuickSynopsis Automatic configuration was introduced with XFree86 4.4.0 which makes it possible to start XFree86 without first creating a configuration file. This has been further improved in subsequent releases. If you experienced any problems with automatic configuration in a previous release, it is worth trying it again with this release. While the initial automatic configuration support was originally targeted just for Linux and the FreeBSD variants, as of 4.5.0 it also includes Solaris, NetBSD and OpenBSD support. Full support for automatic configuration is planned for other platforms in futurereleases. If you arerunning Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, or Solaris, try Auto Configuration by run- ning: XFree86 -autoconfig If you want to customise some things afterwards, you can cut and paste the automatically gener- ated configuration from the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file into an XF86Config file and make your customisations there. If you need to customise some parts of the configuration while leav- ing others to be automatically detected, you can combine a partial static configuration with the automatically detected one by running: XFree86 -appendauto If you areusing a platform that is not currently supported, then you must try one of the older methods for getting started like "xf86cfg", which is our graphical configuration tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of the Chromium Browser in the GENIVI Platform
    static void _f_do_barnacle_install_properties(GObjectClass *gobject_class) { GParamSpec *pspec; Integration of the Chromium /* Party code attribute */ pspec = g_param_spec_uint64 (F_DO_BARNACLE_CODE, Browser in the GENIVI Platform "Barnacle code.", "Barnacle code", 0, G_MAXUINT64, G_MAXUINT64 /* default value */, G_PARAM_READABLE | G_PARAM_WRITABLE | G_PARAM_PRIVATE); Jacobo Aragunde Pérez g_object_class_install_property (gobject_class, blogs.igalia.com/jaragunde F_DO_BARNACLE_PROP_CODE, ● Open Source experts and consultants ● 15 years of experience ● Important contributions to: ● Client-side web technologies: WebKit, Blink/Chromium, Servo ● Graphics & Multimedia: Mesa, GStreamer ● Compilers: V8, JavaScriptCore, SpiderMonkey, Guile ● Software-defined networking: Snabb ● ... Introduction Goals of the project ● Integrate full-featured Chromium browser in GDP ● Use Intel’s Ozone-Wayland project, most complete implementation of Wayland so far ● Get latest possible version of the browser working ● Analyze and fix multi-seat implementation, if required ● Funding: GENIVI challenge grant and Igalia contributions Elements and versions ● Chromium: latest stable release was 54 at that point ● Ozone-Wayland: latest branch supports Chromium 53 ● Meta-browser: supporting Chromium 48 ● GENIVI BSPs Rebase & integrate Chromium browser Work on meta-browser ● Simplify configuration ● Obsolete CHROMIUM_ENABLE_WAYLAND detection ● Build chromium+wayland version 53 ● Recipe was pointing to version 48 ● Required patch backport ● Fix specific build scenarios
    [Show full text]
  • Instability Thresholds and Dynamics of Mesa Patterns in Reaction-Diffusion Systems
    Instability thresholds and dynamics of mesa patterns in reaction-diffusion systems Rebecca McKay and Theodore Kolokolnikov Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Canada Abstract We consider a class of one-dimensional reaction-diffusion systems, u = ε2u + f(u, w) t xx . 0= Dw + g(u, w) xx Under some generic conditions on the nonlinearities f,g, in the singular limit ε 0, and for a fixed D independent of ε, such a system exhibits a steady state consisting→ of sharp back-to-back interfaces which is stable in time. On the other hand, it is also known that in the so-called shadow limit D = , the periodic pattern having more than one interface is unstable. In this paper, we analyse∞ in detail the transition between the stable patterns when D = O(1) and the shadow system when D = . We show that this transition occurs when D is exponentially large in ε and we derive instability∞ thresholds D D D . such 1 2 3 that a periodic pattern with 2K interfaces is stable if D<DK and is unstable when D>DK . We also study the dynamics of the interfaces when D is exponentially large; this allows us to describe in detail the mechanism leading to the instability. Direct numerical computations of stability and dynamics are performed; excellent agreement with the asymptotic results is observed. 1 Introduction One of the most prevalent phenomena observed in reaction-diffusion systems is the formation of mesa patterns. Such patterns consist of a sequence of highly localized interfaces (or kinks) that are separated in space by regions where the solution is nearly constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Panfrost: Liberating ARM Gpus
    Panfrost: Liberating ARM GPUs Robert Foss @memcpy_io http://memcpy.io $ whoami Robert Foss - Based in Berlin - Work in Open Source - Specialize in Linux Graphics $ whoami Robert Foss - Based in Berlin - Work in Open Source - Specialize in Linux Graphics $ whoami Robert Foss - Based in Berlin - Work in Open Source - Specialize in Linux Graphics ARM GPUs Mali 2/3/4XX - Codenamed Utgard - Supported by Lima driver - Supports OpenGL ES <= 2.0 - Acquired with Phalanx Mali T-XXX - Codenamed Midgard - Supported by Panfrost driver - Supports OpenGL ES <= 3.1 - Supports Vulkan <= 1.0 - Design targeted OpenCL heavily Mali G-XX - Codenamed Bifrost - Supported by Panfrost driver - Supports OpenGL ES <= 3.2 - Supports Vulkan <= 1.1 - Partial re-design of Midgard Mali G-YY - Codenamed Valhall - Supports OpenGL ES <= 3.2 - Supports Vulkan <= 1.1 - New ISA & Compute core Driver History Driver History 7 1 0 2 Reverse EngineeringPanfrost Shader Loader Panfrost Prototype Panfrost Wayland 0 2 0 2 Driver History 7 1 0 2 Kernel and Mesa Panfrost committed Mali T820 Mali T720 0 2 0 2 Panfrost Today Panfrost Today - Deployed on Mali T720, T820 & T860 Panfrost Today - Deployed on Mali T720, T820 & T860 - Runs normal Desktop Environments Panfrost Today - Deployed on Mali T720, T820 & T860 - Runs normal Desktop Environments - Supports OpenGL ES <= 2.0 Panfrost Today - Deployed on Mali T720, T820 & T860 - Runs normal Desktop Environments - Supports OpenGL ES <= 2.0 - OpenGL ES 3.0 soon, with 3.1 & 3.2 coming Panfrost Today - Deployed on Mali T720, T820 & T860 - Runs
    [Show full text]
  • TG-Gallium Driver Stack Softpipe, Cell and Beyond
    TG-Gallium Driver Stack Softpipe, Cell and Beyond Keith Whitwell [email protected] DRI Driver Model drm App Mesa DRI Driver DRI ● Leaky interface between Mesa and driver. ● Drivers getting bigger, more complex. ● API, OS dependencies encoded in driver. Keith Whitwell [email protected] Impose new interfaces drm App Mesa DRI Driver DRI ● Isolate interactions with API, OS, HW. ● Identify new interfaces. ● Split the driver. Keith Whitwell [email protected] A New Model drm Gallium State OS, App Mesa HW tracker Winsys Driver DRI ● New components: – State tracker, HW driver, Winsys. ● The TG-Gallium driver stack. Keith Whitwell [email protected] Gallium Driver Model ● Driver interface inspired by GL3, NV_GPU4, i965 hardware, etc. ● Constant state objects. ● Simple drawing interface. ● Unified shading language, as bytecode. ● Private buffers as render targets. ● Ability to re-target HW drivers to new APIs (eg. GL3, GLES, ???). ● Ability to re-target HW drivers to new window systems, OS's. Keith Whitwell [email protected] Gallium Driver Model ● Driver interface inspired by GL3, NV_GPU4, i965 hardware, etc. ● Constant state objects. ● Simple drawing interface. – DrawArrays, DrawElements ● Unified shading language, as bytecode. ● Private buffers as render targets. ● Fullscreen clears. ● Other blits?? Maybe subject to strict restrictions. Keith Whitwell [email protected] Gallium HW Driver ● Significantly simpler than a DRI driver. ● Interface: – Create/Bind/Delete state objects – Draw – one or two entrypoints. – Buffer management and fencing. – Flush ● Each Gallium driver defines its own OS- level (current name: winsys) interface. ● Re-target driver by re-implementing the winsys layer, eg. miniglx, EGL, etc. Keith Whitwell [email protected] Mesa State Tracker ● Implements current Mesa driver model.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to VISUALIZE YOUR GPU-ACCELERATED SIMULATION RESULTS Peter Messmer, NVIDIA
    HOW TO VISUALIZE YOUR GPU-ACCELERATED SIMULATION RESULTS Peter Messmer, NVIDIA RANGE OF ANALYSIS AND VIZ TASKS . Analysis: Focus quantitative . Visualization: Focus qualitative . Monitoring, Steering TRADITIONAL HPC WORKFLOW Workstation Analysis, Setup Visualization Supercomputer Viz Cluster Dump, Checkpointing Visualization, Analysis File System TRADITIONAL WORKFLOW: CHALLENGES Lack of interactivity prevents “intuition” Workstation High-end viz Analysis, neglected due Setup Visualization to workflow complexity Supercomputer Viz Cluster Viz resources need I/O becomes main to scale with simulation Dump, simulation bottleneck Checkpointing Visualization, Analysis File System OUTLINE . Visualization applications . CUDA/OpenGL interop . Remote viz . Parallel viz . In-Situ viz High-level overview. Some parts platform dependent. Check with your sysadmin. VISUALIZATION APPLICATIONS NON-REPRESENTATIVE VIZ TOOLS SURVEY OF 25 HPC SITES Surveyed sites: LLNL LLNL- ORNL- AFRL- NASA- NERSC -OCF SCF LANL CCS DOD-ORC DSCR AFRL ARL ERDC NAVY MHPCC ORS CCAC NAS NASA-NCCS TACC CHPC RZG HLRN Julich CSCS CSC Hector Curie NON-REPRESENTATIVE VIZ TOOLS SURVEY OF 25 HPC SITES Surveyed sites: LLNL LLNL- ORNL- AFRL- NASA- NERSC -OCF SCF LANL CCS DOD-ORC DSCR AFRL ARL ERDC NAVY MHPCC ORS CCAC NAS NASA-NCCS TACC CHPC RZG HLRN Julich CSCS CSC Hector Curie VISIT . Scalar, vector and tensor field data features — Plots: contour, curve, mesh, pseudo-color, volume,.. — Operators: slice, iso-surface, threshold, binning,.. Quantitative and qualitative analysis/vis — Derived fields, dimension reduction, line-outs — Pick & query . Scalable architecture . Open source http://wci.llnl.gov/codes/visit/ VISIT . Cross-platform — Linux/Unix, OSX, Windows . Wide range of data formats — .vtk, .netcdf, .hdf5,.. Extensible — Plugin architecture . Embeddable . Python scriptable VISIT’S SCALABLE ARCHITECTURE .
    [Show full text]
  • Building a 3D Graphic User Interface in Linux
    Freescale Semiconductor Document Number: AN4045 Application Note Rev. 0, 01/2010 Building a 3D Graphic User Interface in Linux Building Appealing, Eye-Catching, High-End 3D UIs with i.MX31 by Multimedia Application Division Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Austin, TX To compete in the market, apart from aesthetics, mobile Contents 1. X Window System . 2 devices are expected to provide simplicity, functionality, and 1.1. UI Issues . 2 elegance. Customers prefer attractive mobile devices and 2. Overview of GUI Options for Linux . 3 expect new models to be even more attractive. For embedded 2.1. Graphics Toolkit . 3 devices, a graphic user interface is essential as it enhances 2.2. Open Graphics Library® . 4 3. Clutter Toolkit - Solution for GUIs . 5 the ease of use. Customers expect the following qualities 3.1. Features . 5 when they use a Graphical User Interface (GUI): 3.2. Clutter Overview . 6 3.3. Creating the Scenegraph . 7 • Quick and responsive feedback for user actions that 3.4. Behaviors . 8 clarifies what the device is doing. 3.5. Animation by Frames . 9 • Natural animations. 3.6. Event Handling . 10 4. Conclusion . 10 • Provide cues, whenever appropriate, instead of 5. Revision History . 11 lengthy textual descriptions. • Quick in resolving distractions when the system is loading or processing. • Elegant and beautiful UI design. This application note provides an overview and a guide for creating a complex 3D User Interface (UI) in Linux® for the embedded devices. © Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 2010. All rights reserved. X Window System 1 X Window System The X Window system (commonly X11 or X) is a computer software system and network protocol that implements X display protocol and provides windowing on bitmap displays.
    [Show full text]
  • New Evolutions in the X Window System
    New Evolutions in the X Window System Matthieu Herrb∗ and Matthias Hopf† October 2005 Abstract This paper presents an overview of recent and on-going evolutions in the X window system. First, the state of some features will be presented that are already available for several months in the X server, but not yet widely used in applications. Then some ongoing and future evolutions will be shown: on the short term, the new EXA acceleration framework and the new modular- ized build system. The last part will focus on a longer term project: the new Xgl server architecture, based on the OpenGL technology for both 2D and 3D acceleration. Introduction The X window system celebrated its twentieth birthday last year. After some quick evolution in its early years, its development slowed down during the nineties, be- cause the system had acquired a level of maturity that made it fit most of the needs of the users of graphical work stations. But after all this time, pushed by the com- petition with other systems (Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows) the need for more advanced graphics features triggered new developments. The first part of this paper is going to describe some of these features that are already available (and have been used) for a couple of years but not necessarily known by users of the X window system. A second part will address some on-going work that will be part of the X11R7 release: a new 2D acceleration architecture and the modularization of the source tree. In the third part, a complete redesign of the device dependent layer of the X server, based on OpenGL, will be presented.
    [Show full text]