King Richard III Tour of England
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Richmondshire Local Plan Core Strategy
Richmondshire Local Plan Core Strategy Post Hearing Proposed Modifications Table April 2014 Pre - Pos t- M Modification Comment Hearing Hearing Mod Ref Mod Ref Chapter Chapter Paragraph Paragraph CP/SP/Title CP/SP/Title Mod Number Mod Number M / 1 / 0 / 01 1.4 Before Factual Change to reflect M001 - The Local Plan Core Strategy provides the local perspective on Regional Spatial Strategy future development consistent with the current statutory revocation in February 2013 and development plan system. The Council has responded to the results of Development Target expected abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) by Review (August publishing its Local Strategy Statement (2011) setting a locally 2013) distinct strategic context for future development. This context reflects several stages of preparation and consultation from early 2009 to late 2011. Details of this process, its regulatory compliance and, most importantly, how the Local Plan Core Strategy has been shaped by consultation responses are given in the Local Plan Core Strategy Consultation Statement. After The Local Plan Core Strategy provides the local perspective on future development consistent with the current statutory development plan system. The Council responded to the expected abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) by publishing its Local Strategy Statement (2011) setting a locally distinct strategic context for future development. This context reflects several stages of preparation and consultation from early 2009 to late 2011. Details of this process, its regulatory compliance and, most importantly, how the Local Plan Core Strategy has been shaped by consultation responses are given in the Local Plan Core Strategy Consultation Statement. The Yorkshire and Humber RSS was finally revoked in February 2013. -
Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20. -
Introduction
INTRODUCTION. FORMER publications * of the Camden Society have brought before our notice Richard Duke of Gloucester, as continually engaged in the intrigues of a court or the storms of civil war, while for four centuries both his person and character have been the theme of almost universal vituperation. Into these subjects it is not the province of the editor of the present volume to enter; and, in truth, there is now the less occasion for it, since the volumes of Miss Halsted have appeared in the field of literature. This talented and zealous writer has adduced a host of authorities, apparently proving that his personal deformity existed but in the libels of an opposing faction, perpetuated in the pages of the poet and the novelist; while at the same time her researches seem to throw such light over the darker shades in his chequered career, as to induce the strongest presumption that he was not guilty of, or accessory to, those startling crimes which have been charged to his account. The limits, however, of the brief introduction allotted to this work, compel us to turn our attention from scenes of battle and of blood to other, and to us more interesting portions of his history. When, on the partition f of Warwick's vast domains between the sister heiresses, the lordship and manor of Middleharn, with its ancestral castle, became the fair heritage of Gloucester in * Historic of the Arrival of Edward IV. ; Warkworth's Chronicle ; and Polydore Vergil; being Nos. I. X. and XXVIII. of the Camden Society's publications. -
REACHING out a Celebration of the Work of the Choir Schools’ Association
REACHING OUT A celebration of the work of the Choir Schools’ Association The Choir Schools’ Association represents 46 schools attached to cathedrals, churches and college chapels educating some 25,000 children. A further 13 cathedral foundations, who draw their choristers from local schools, hold associate membership. In total CSA members look after nearly 1700 boy and girl choristers. Some schools cater for children up to 13. Others are junior schools attached to senior schools through to 18. Many are Church of England but the Roman Catholic, Scottish and Welsh churches are all represented. Most choir schools are independent but five of the country’s finest maintained schools are CSA members. Being a chorister is a huge commitment for children and parents alike. In exchange for their singing they receive an excellent musical training and first-class academic and all-round education. They acquire self- discipline and a passion for music which stay with them for the rest of their lives. CONTENTS Introduction by Katharine, Duchess of Kent ..................................................................... 1 Opportunity for All ................................................................................................................. 2 The Scholarship Scheme ....................................................................................................... 4 CSA’s Chorister Fund ............................................................................................................. 6 Finding Choristers ................................................................................................................. -
February 2021 Support for Leicester Cathedral Revealed
Diocese of Leicester Diocesan Synod – 13th February 2021 Support for Leicester Cathedral Revealed Resolution 1 The Synod agrees to make a grant of £500,000 from the funds of the Leicester Diocesan Board of Finance to the ‘Leicester Cathedral Revealed’ project. Amendment 1 The Synod amends Resolution 1 by substituting ‘The Synod approves the purchase at fair market value by the Leicester Diocesan Board of Finance of one of the clergy houses belonging to Leicester Cathedral.’ The pages which follow set out the case for Synod to support Resolution 1 or Amendment 1. 0. Procedural note 0.1 The DBF trustees agreed to recommend to the Diocesan Synod, but subject to Bishops Leadership Team (BLT) endorsement of the missional priority of the project, “that the Cathedral should be awarded a grant of £500k towards Leicester Cathedral Revealed (LCR). The trustees further agreed that, in the event that it were not possible to award a grant, then the option of buying one of the Cathedral clergy houses and leasing it back should be pursued.” 0.2 Following consideration of this recommendation, there was a clear consensus amongst the members of BLT to endorse the recommendation of the DBF trustees. Accordingly, Synod is presented with Resolution 1, which encapsulates the preference of both the DBF Trustees and the members of BLT. However, Amendment 1 will be moved to enable Synod, should it not feel able to make a grant, to consider the alternative of supporting LCR by purchasing and leasing back one of the Cathedral clergy houses, thereby releasing its cash value for the Cathedral to put towards the costs of LCR. -
Property Maintenance Code
Property Maintenance Code City of York, Pennsylvania UPDATED OCTOBER 2015 C. Kim Bracey, Mayor Property Maintenance Code of the City of York, Pennsylvania As adopted by the Council of the City of York, Pennsylvania Session 2000 COPYRIGHT © 1998 BY INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. All rights reserved. Chapters 1 through 8, inclusive, of the Property Maintenance Code of the City of York designate and incorporate portions of the ICC International Property Maintenance Code, 1998 edition, a copyrighted work owned by the INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. Without advance written permission from the copyright owner, no part of this book may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, without limitation, electronic, optical, or mechanical means (by way of example, and not limitation, photocopying, or recording by or in an information storage and retrieval system). The CITY OF YORK edition of this copyrighted work is by arrangement with BOCA International, Inc. For information on permission to copy material exceeding fair use, please contact: Chief Executive Officer, BOCA International, Inc., 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478, (708) 799-2300. AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS COPYRIGHT © 2000 BY THE CITY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA All rights reserved. No amendments or additions made by the City of York, Pennsylvania to the ICC International Property Maintenance Code, 1998 edition, as reproduced in this book, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by an information storage and retrieval system without advance permission in writing from the City of York, Pennsylvania. For information, address: City of York, Bureau of Permits, Planning and Zoning, 101 South George Street, P.O. -
Town of York Home Rule Charter
TOWN OF YORK HOME RULE CHARTER Adopted November 5, 1991 Amended November 7, 1995 Amended November 4, 1997 Amended November 2, 1999 Amended November 6, 2001 Amended November 4, 2003 Amended November 8, 2005 Amended May 20, 2006 Amended November 7, 2006 Amended May 18, 2013 Amended July 14, 2020 York Home Rule Charter INDEX TOWN OF YORK HOME RULE CHARTER Page ARTICLE 1: GRANTS OF POWERS TO THE TOWN...................... 1 Section 1: Incorporation........................................................................... 1 Section 2: Form of Government.............................................................. 1 Section 3: Construction............................................................................ 1 Section 4: Intergovernmental Relations.................................................. 1 Section 5: Short Title................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE II. TOWN MEETINGS......................................................... 2 Section 1: The Legislative Body.............................................................. 2 Section 2: Town Meeting Referenda Elections....................................... 2 Section 3: Fiscal Year................................................................................ 3 Section 4: Budget Committee................................................................. 3 Section 5: Submission of School Budget and Message.......................... 4 Section 6: Submission of Municipal Budget and Message................... 4 Section 7: Municipal -
East Coast Modern a Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games
www.creativerail.co.uk East Coast Modern A Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games Contents A Brief History of the Route Route Requirements Scenarios Belmont Yard – York Freight Doncaster – Newark Freight Grantham – Doncaster Non-Stop Hexthorpe – Marshgate Freight Newark – Doncaster Works Peterborough – Tallington Freight Peterborough – York Non-Stop Selby – York York – Doncaster Works Operating Notices Acknowledgements © Copyright CreativeRail. All rights reserved. 2018. www.creativerail.co.uk A Brief History of the Route The first incarnation of the East Coast Main Line dates back to 1850 when London to Edinburgh services became possible on the completion of a permanent bridge over the River Tweed. However, the route was anything but direct, would have taken many, many hours and would have been exhausting. By 1852, the Great Northern Railway had completed the 'Towns Line' between Werrington (Peterborough) and Retford, which saw journey times between York and London of five hours. Edinburgh to London was a daunting eleven. Over time, the route has endured harsh periods, not helped by two world wars. It only benefited from very little improvement. Nevertheless, journey times did shrink. Names and companies synonymous with the route, such as, LNER and Gresley have secured their place in history, along with the most famous service - 'The Flying Scotsman'. Motive power also developed with an ever increasing calibre including A3s, A4s Class 55s and HSTs that have powered expresses through the decades. The introduction of HST services in 1978 saw the Flying Scotsman reach Edinburgh in only five hours. A combination of remodelling, track improvements and full electrification has seen a further reduction to what it is today, which sees the Scotsman complete the 393 miles in under four and a half hours in the capable hands of Class 91 and Mk4 IC225 formations. -
Minerals and Waste Core Strategy
Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound. -
UKBJJA 1St University League University of Nottingham No-Gi Categories
UKBJJA 1st University League University of Nottingham No-Gi Categories Beginner / Male / u69 Daron Coaker Edge Hill University William Chase Brennand University of Nottingham Samuel Mitchell University of Warwick Christopher Lϋbker University of York David Crockford Nottingham Trent University Liam Ashley Padfield University of Birmingham Zach Sheridan University College London Milo Diebel University of York Valter Gubeladze University of Nottingham Samuel Forsythe King's College London Total: 10 Beginner / Male / u77 Mark Dawson University of Nottingham Nick Charnley University of York Chris Beattie University of Oxford Felix Major University of Nottingham Hamza Javed University of Bristol Jack McCann University of Warwick Max Joshua University College London Dahlin Mony University College London Dan Hobbins University College London Vibesan Illsmpooranan University of Nottingham Sim Henderson University of Nottingham Charlie Adorian University of Nottingham Idris Mhiri University of York Sutthikun Ratsirivattanakul Nottingham Trent University Total: 14 Beginner / Male / u85 Jacob Watkinson University of Warwick Daniel Dimmock Nottingham Trent University Dominic Amlot University of York James Keenan University of Birmingham Frank Chen University of Warwick Liam Jackson Walsh University of Liverpool Daneil Timbrell University College London Jakub Sliwinski University of Oxford Levi Francis University of Hull Total: 8 Beginner / Male / u94 Tom Bradford University of Worcester Juan Gaviria Duenas Loughborough University Ben Carter University -
Allchurches Trust Beneficiaries 2020
ALLCHURCHES TRUST LIMITED Beneficiaries of grants awarded in 2020 1 During the year, the charity awarded grants for the following national projects: 2020 £000 Grants for national projects: 4Front Theatre, Worcester, Worcestershire 2 A Rocha UK, Southall, London 15 Archbishops' Council of the Church of England, London 2 Archbishops' Council, London 105 Betel UK, Birmingham 120 Cambridge Theological Federation, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire 2 Catholic Marriage Care Ltd, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire 16 Christian Education t/a RE Today Services, Birmingham, West Midlands 280 Church Pastoral Aid Society (CPAS), Coventry, West Midlands 7 Counties (formerly Counties Evangelistic Work), Westbury, Wiltshire 3 Cross Rhythms, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire 3 Fischy Music, Edinburgh 4 Fusion, Loughborough, Leicestershire 83 Gregory Centre for Church Multiplication, London 350 Home for Good, London 1 HOPE Together, Rugby, Warwickshire 17 Innervation Trust Limited, Hanley Swan, Worcestershire 10 Keswick Ministries, Keswick, Cumbria 9 Kintsugi Hope, Boreham, Essex 10 Linking Lives UK, Earley, Berkshire 10 Methodist Homes, Derby, Derbyshire 4 Northamptonshire Association of Youth Clubs (NAYC), Northampton, Northamptonshire 6 Plunkett Foundation, Woodstock, Oxfordshire 203 Pregnancy Centres Network, Winchester, Hampshire 7 Relational Hub, Littlehampton, West Sussex 120 Restored, Teddington, Middlesex 8 Safe Families for Children, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire 280 Safe Families, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Tyne and Wear 8 Sandford St Martin (Church of England) Trust, -
Middleham Conservation Areas Appraisal And
MIDDLEHAM CONSERVATION AREAS APPRAISAL AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Adopted as supplementary planning guidance 20.09.07 Contents APPRAISAL Introduction Location and Setting Historic Development and Archaeology Architecture and Building Materials Character Functions/uses The approaches Landscape, William’s Hill and the Castle The cobbled areas, Market Place, Swine Market and West End The frontages around Market Place, Kirkgate, Swine Market and West End The back lanes, and yards Conclusions MANAGEMENT PLAN Preservation and Enhancement Design guidance Listed Buildings The protection of other buildings Opportunities Overhead wires Neglected buildings, land and sites The approaches Parking Development Sustainability Action Points Community Involvement Useful Information, Appendices and Contact Details APPRAISAL Introduction A Conservation Area is an “area of special architectural or historic interest the character and appearance or which it is desirable to preserve and enhance” (Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990). Middleham was designated as a Conservation Area in 1973. Local Planning Authorities are required to “formulate and publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement of any parts of their area, which are conservation areas” (Section 71 of the Act). This character appraisal and management plan fulfils that duty. In making a decision on an application for development in a Conservation Area, “special attention shall be paid to the desirability of preserving and enhancing the character or appearance of that area” (Section 72 of the Act). While this should ensure that harmful change is not allowed, some changes, not normally requiring planning permission (known as permitted development) could still damage the special qualities of the area. Local Authorities have special powers to issue directions removing certain permitted development rights from properties if it can be shown that it is necessary.