Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 3 Article 5 Issue 1 Fall Interpreting the NFL Player Contract Gary R. Roberts Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Gary R. Roberts, Interpreting the NFL Player Contract, 3 Marq. Sports L. J. 29 (1992) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol3/iss1/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. INTERPRETING THE NFL PLAYER CONTRACT GARY R. ROBERTS* I. INTRODUCTION Before actually looking at the terms of the NFL's standard player con- tract ("SPK") (see Attachment A), some general observations are in order. The first is that what is described herein may by tomorrow be irrelevant. As this is being written (October 1992), the NFL is operating without a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") - in fact, without even a players association that claims to be a certified bargaining agent (a union) for the players. Thus, unlike the contracts in the other three major sports, the SPK cannot necessarily be interpreted in light of an overriding CBA. However, the league and a group of players financially backed and led by the NFLPA are currently entering the sixth year of antitrust and other ancillary litiga- tion focussing on the NFL's rules and policies relating to veteran players' ability to move to a new team - the so-called Plan B system,1 which in light of the September 10, 1992 jury verdict in McNeil v.