Predatory Impact of Rainbow Trout on Native Fish in the Cape Size

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Predatory Impact of Rainbow Trout on Native Fish in the Cape Size Predatory impact of non-native rainbow trout on endemic fish populations in headwater streams in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa Jeremy M. Shelton, Michael J. Samways & Jenny A. Day Biological Invasions ISSN 1387-3547 Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-014-0735-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer International Publishing Switzerland. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-014-0735-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Predatory impact of non-native rainbow trout on endemic fish populations in headwater streams in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa Jeremy M. Shelton • Michael J. Samways • Jenny A. Day Received: 27 September 2013 / Accepted: 3 June 2014 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Abstract Non-native rainbow trout Oncorhynchus trout. The mean densities of native Breede River redfin mykiss have been widely introduced in the Cape Pseudobarbus burchelli, Cape kurper Sandelia capen- Floristic Region (CFR) at the south-western tip of sis and Cape galaxias Galaxias zebratus, were 89–97 % Africa and may pose a serious threat to endemic lower in invaded streams than in streams without trout. freshwater fishes in the region. Quantitative informa- Furthermore, while native fish were present at all 12 tion about trout impacts in the CFR is scarce but is sites without trout, they were not recorded at seven of urgently needed to guide legislation and management the 12 invaded sites. None of the measured environ- efforts. We used a combination of comparative and mental variables differed significantly between sites experimental approaches to evaluate impacts of intro- with and without trout, and distance-based linear duced trout on native fish populations in headwater models identified trout density as the best predictor of streams draining the upper Breede River catchment in redfin and kurper density, while galaxias density was the CFR. Fish populations were surveyed, and 19 best predicted by other environmental variables (ripar- environmental variables measured, in 24 minimally- ian vegetation, canopy cover, substrate length, site disturbed streams, half of which had been invaded by slope). Native fish B40 mm in length were largely absent from invaded streams, but generally abundant in streams without trout, and a field experiment confirmed Electronic supplementary material The online version of that trout selectively consume small redfin. Taken this article (doi:10.1007/s10530-014-0735-9) contains supple- mentary material, which is available to authorized users. together, these findings constitute evidence that trout have depleted the abundance of CFR-endemic fishes J. M. Shelton (&) Á J. A. Day through size-selective predation. It is recommended University of Cape Town, that managers aim to prevent new trout introductions Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa and consider eradicating trout populations where they e-mail: [email protected] pose a threat to highly threatened native species. J. M. Shelton Keywords Invasive Á Oncorhynchus mykiss Á DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (CIB), Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch Predation Á Threatened native fish 7602, South Africa Introduction M. J. Samways Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, The rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum South Africa 1792) is among the most widely introduced fish in the 123 Author's personal copy J. M. Shelton et al. world (Fausch 2007). From its native range in Pacific endemic to the region (Skelton 2001; Chakona and North America and eastern Russia, it has been Swartz 2013), but nearly all of these endemic species introduced to at least 97 countries, and to every appear in the categories vulnerable, endangered and continent except Antarctica (Crawford and Muir critically endangered of the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2013). 2008). Rainbow trout are gape-limited predators Threats include habitat loss and fragmentation, hydro- (Lescak and von Hippel 2011), and while as juveniles logical alteration, climate change, overfishing and pollu- they feed mostly on small invertebrates, they can tion, but the greatest threat is that posed by introduced consume increasingly larger prey, such as amphibians predatory fish (Tweddle et al. 2009; Chakona and Swartz and fish, as they grow (Raleigh et al. 1984). In many 2012). To date, 16 species of non-native freshwater fish cases, introduced rainbow trout have established self- have established self-sustaining populations in the CFR sustaining populations (Fausch 2007) and negative (Marr 2012), and several of these species have been impacts on native fish populations, largely as a result linked to declines in native fish populations (de Moor and of predation, have been reported from across the globe Bruton 1988;Tweddleetal.2009). [e.g. New Zealand (McDowall 2006), Australia Interactions with non-native fish, combined with (Crowl et al. 1992; Lintermans 2000; McDowall the effects of habitat degradation, have led to the 2006), South America (Young et al. 2010; Habit et al. disappearance of native fish from the middle and lower 2010), North America (Dunham et al. 2004) and in sections of many rivers in the CFR (Tweddle et al. Japan (Kitano 2004)]. Because of their widespread and 2009; de Moor and Day 2013; Weyl et al. 2013). severe impacts, rainbow trout have been listed by the Consequently, the region’s native fish populations World Conservation Union Global Invasive Species have become highly fragmented, and many species are Programme (GISP) as one of the World’s 100 Worst now largely restricted to headwater reaches of streams Alien Invasive Species (Lowe et al. 2000). Although (Swartz et al. 2004; Tweddle et al. 2009; Chakona and the consequences of rainbow trout introductions have Swartz 2012). Headwater streams have generally been received detailed study in many areas, impacts in other less severely impacted by human-related activities locations, such as South Africa, remain largely than lower-lying reaches because they are situated in unknown. mountainous areas that are difficult to access and Rainbow trout (henceforth ‘‘trout’’) were intro- unsuitable for agriculture, human settlements and duced to South Africa in 1897 for angling purposes (de reservoirs (Swartz et al. 2004; Tweddle et al. 2009;de Moor and Bruton 1988), and widespread stocking of Moor and Day 2013). Consequently, the headwater the country’s rivers ensued (Hey 1926). Today trout reaches of streams function as native fish refugia occur in *75 % of South Africa’s major river systems, within the region’s highly degraded riverscapes, and and while self-sustaining populations are generally are thus critical habitats from a conservation perspec- limited to the cooler headwater reaches of streams, tive. Trout are well adapted to environmental condi- many other populations are sustained through contin- tions in these headwater streams (Raleigh et al. 1984) ual stocking (van Rensburg et al. 2011). Beginning in and may pose a serious threat to remaining native fish the 1960s, conservation organizations gradually populations in the CFR (Cambray 2003). became aware that trout appeared to be having a To our knowledge, there has only been one previous negative impact on native aquatic species, particularly assessment of trout impacts on native fish in the CFR; fishes (de Moor and Bruton 1988). Despite the fact that that of Woodford and Impson (2004), who studied negative impacts of trout in South Africa have long interactions between trout and three species of native been suspected, evidence is mostly circumstantial and fish and found some evidence for spatial segregation anecdotal (de Moor and Bruton 1988; Cambray 2003). between trout and native fish and predation by trout on Quantitative information on trout impacts in South one native species, the Cape galaxias Galaxias zebratus Africa is urgently needed to guide legislation and (Castelnau 1861). Although their study was confined to management efforts (Cambray 2003). five pools within a single stream (the upper Berg River), The Cape Floristic Region (CFR) at the south-western their findings are consistent with the view that trout may tip of South Africa is a hotspot for freshwater fish have a negative predatory impact on native fish endemism (Linder et al. 2010; de Moor and Day 2013). populations in CFR streams. The aim of the present Of the 20 species that have been described, 17 are study was to expand on their preliminary work by 123 Author's personal copy Predatory impact of non-native rainbow trout on endemic fish populations Fig. 1 Location of sampling sites in the upper Breede River with trout. The numbers of the sampling sites correspond to the catchment in the CFR of South Africa. White circles represent numbers in Supplementary Material 1. Names of towns, as well sampling sites without trout, and black circles represent sites as major rivers and reservoirs, are shown evaluating the predatory impact of introduced trout on tributaries of the Sonderend River upstream of Thee- CFR-endemic fishes through a combination of compar- waterskloof Reservoir (Fig. 1). The area experiences a ative and experimental approaches. We surveyed fish Mediterranean climate (Cowling and Holmes 1992)and populations, and measured environmental variables, at has a mean annual rainfall of *800 mm (Steynor et al. sites on 24 headwater streams in a catchment partially 2009). Natural vegetation is predominantly Sandstone invaded by trout to assess their impacts on native fish Fynbos (Rebelo et al.
Recommended publications
  • Feature: INTRODUCED FISH and ECOLOGY
    Feature: INTRODUCED FISH AND ECOLOGY Ecological Impacts of Non-native Freshwater Fishes Julien Cucherousset Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Applied Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom Impactos Ecológicos de Peces Foráneos CNRS, UPS, ENFA, UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité de Agua Dulce Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France Université de Toulouse, UPS, UMR5174 EDB, F-31062 Toulouse, France RESUMEN: Hay una larga historia de introducciones de especies de peces foráneos de agua dulce y la tasa Julian D. Olden de introducción se ha acelerado considerablemente a School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, través del tiempo. Si bien no todos los peces introduci- Box 355020, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA (Address correspondence dos tienen efectos notables en sus nuevos ecosistemas, to [email protected]) muchos de ellos ejercen importantes impactos ecológi- cos, evolutivos y económicos. Para los investigadores, ABSTRACT: There is a long history of introduction of non-native administradores y tomadores de decisiones que están in- fishes in fresh waters and the introduction rate has accelerated great- teresados en la conservación de la diversidad dulceacuí- ly over time. Although not all introduced fishes have appreciable cola, es de suma importancia entender la magnitud y effects on their new ecosystems, many exert significant ecological, alcance de los potenciales impactos de especies foráneas evolutionary, and economic impacts. For researchers, managers, de agua dulce. El presente estudio provee un panorama and policy makers interested in conserving freshwater diversity, un- de la literatura más reciente sobre impactos ecológicos derstanding the magnitude and array of potential impacts of non-na- asociados a la introducción de peces foráneos de agua tive fish species is of utmost importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Hidden Diversity and Taxonomic Conflicts in Five Stream Fishes from the Eastern Zimbabwe Highlands Freshwater Ecoregion
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 768: 69–95Evidence (2018) of hidden diversity and taxonomic conflicts in five stream fishes... 69 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.768.21944 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Evidence of hidden diversity and taxonomic conflicts in five stream fishes from the Eastern Zimbabwe Highlands freshwater ecoregion Albert Chakona1,2, Wilbert T. Kadye2, Taurai Bere3, Daniel N. Mazungula1,2, Emmanuel Vreven4,5 1 South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown, South Africa, 6140 2 Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown, South Africa, 6140 3 School of Wildlife, Ecology and Conservation, Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe 4 Royal Museum for Central Africa, Section of Vertebrates, Ichthyology, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080, Tervuren, Belgium 5 KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutio- nary Genomics, Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Corresponding author: Albert Chakona ([email protected]) Academic editor: N. Bogutskaya | Received 30 October 2018 | Accepted 25 April 2018 | Published 19 June 2018 http://zoobank.org/9621930C-8C43-40D0-8554-684035E99FAA Citation: Chakona A, Kadye WT, Bere T, Mazungula DN, Vreven E (2018) Evidence of hidden diversity and taxonomic conflicts in five stream fishes from the Eastern Zimbabwe Highlands freshwater ecoregion. ZooKeys 768: 69–95. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.768.21944 Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding Discriminates Freshwater Fishes from Southeastern Nigeria and Provides River System-Level Phylogeographic Resoluti
    Mitochondrial DNA, 2011; Early Online: 1–9 DNA barcoding discriminates freshwater fishes from southeastern Nigeria and provides river system-level phylogeographic resolution within some species CHRISTOPHER D. NWANIa, SVEN BECKERb, HEATHER E. BRAIDb, EMMANUEL F. UDEc, OKECHUKWU I. OKOGWUa, & ROBERT HANNERb aDepartment of Applied Biology, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria, bDepartment of Integrative Biology, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, and cFisheries and Aquaculture, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria (Received 17 August 2010; revised 28 October 2010; accepted 28 October 2010) Abstract Background and aims: Fishes are the main animal protein source for human beings and play a vital role in aquatic ecosystems and food webs. Fish identification can be challenging, especially in the tropics (due to high diversity), and this is particularly true for larval forms or fragmentary remains. DNA barcoding, which uses the 50 region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) as a target gene, is an efficient method for standardized species-level identification for biodiversity assessment and conservation, pending the establishment of reference sequence libraries. Materials and methods: In this study, fishes were collected from three rivers in southeastern Nigeria, identified morphologically, and imaged digitally. DNA was extracted, PCR-amplified, and the standard barcode region was bidirectionally sequenced for 363 individuals belonging to 70 species in 38 genera. All specimen provenance data and associated sequence information were For personal use only. recorded in the barcode of life data systems (BOLD; www.barcodinglife.org). Analytical tools on BOLD were used to assess the performance of barcoding to identify species. Results: Using neighbor-joining distance comparison, the average genetic distance was 60-fold higher between species than within species, as pairwise genetic distance estimates averaged 10.29% among congeners and only 0.17% among conspecifics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thermal Tolerance and Preference Of
    The thermal tolerances and preferences of native fish in the Cape Floristic Region: towards understanding the effect of climate change on native fish species by Jody-Lee Reizenberg Town Thesis presented for the Degree of Master of Science Cape in the Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town March 2017 Supervisors: Dr Helen Dallas, Dr Jeremy Shelton, and Dr Cecile Reed University The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work on which this thesis is based is my original work (except where acknowledgements indicate otherwise) and that neither the whole work nor any part of it has been, is being, or is to be submitted for another degree in this or any other university. I authorise the University to reproduce for the purpose of research either the whole or any portion of the contents in any manner whatsoever. This thesis reports original research carried out under the Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Cape Town, between 2015 and 2016 for the M.Sc. study purpose. The data presented here are my own. I have fully acknowledged any assistance received. I know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in the dissertation, save for that which is properly acknowledged, is my own.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIGENOUS FISH for a GARDEN POND by Ernst Van Jaarsveld, Kirstenbosch
    The Otjikoto tilapia (Tilapia guinasana) an endangered fish endemic to Lakes Guinas and Otjikoto in northern Namibia. Illustration by Dave Voorvelt from Paul Skeltons book Freshwater fishes ofsouthern Africa. Below left. Kirstenbosch Visitor's Centre fishpond. Photo: E. van Jaarsveld. INDIGENOUS FISH FOR A GARDEN POND by Ernst van Jaarsveld, Kirstenbosch ccording to Freshwater fishes of southern Africa (like running water). The behaviour of fish, when stocked (Skelton 1993) there are 245 indigenous freshwater with more than one species, must also be taken into A fish species in southern Africa. Some are very consideration as some are aggressive and will kill other fish attractive and suitable for fishponds and aquariums. In species. Traditionally goldfish (Carassius auratus) and khoi selecting indigenous fish for a pond, just as it is with (Cyprinus carpio) are the most popular ornamental fish plants, it is always better to choose a local indigenous species throughout the world. They are hardy, and tolerant species. Like plants, some fish are easy to keep and breed of a wide range of conditions, brightly coloured and easy to from, while others require specialized conditions breed from. The Otjikoto tilapia When the fishpond of the new Visitor's Centre at Kirstenbosch was completed, we had to decide what indigenous plants and indigenous fish species to put in it. The other ponds at Kirstenbosch have the vleikurper (Tilapia sparrmanii), Cape kurper (Sandelia capensis) and the small inconspicuous local indigenous Cape galaxias (Galaxias .zebrata). All these species are highly successful and self sustaining. But we wanted to introduce an indigenous fish that was colourful, interesting and bred easily, yet was also a rare endemic, so that visitors could see that it is not only plants that are often endemic to a small region.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook 2017
    WESTERN CAPE BIODIVERSITY SPATIAL PLAN HANDBOOK Drafted by: CapeNature Scientific Services Land Use Team Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch 2017 Editor: Ruida Pool-Stanvliet Contributing Authors: Alana Duffell-Canham, Genevieve Pence, Rhett Smart i Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook 2017 Citation: Pool-Stanvliet, R., Duffell-Canham, A., Pence, G. & Smart, R. 2017. The Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook. Stellenbosch: CapeNature. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The compilation of the Biodiversity Spatial Plan and Handbook has been a collective effort of the Scientific Services Section of CapeNature. We acknowledge the assistance of Benjamin Walton, Colin Fordham, Jeanne Gouws, Antoinette Veldtman, Martine Jordaan, Andrew Turner, Coral Birss, Alexis Olds, Kevin Shaw and Garth Mortimer. CapeNature’s Conservation Planning Scientist, Genevieve Pence, is thanked for conducting the spatial analyses and compiling the Biodiversity Spatial Plan Map datasets, with assistance from Scientific Service’s GIS Team members: Therese Forsyth, Cher-Lynn Petersen, Riki de Villiers, and Sheila Henning. Invaluable assistance was also provided by Jason Pretorius at the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, and Andrew Skowno and Leslie Powrie at the South African National Biodiversity Institute. Patricia Holmes and Amalia Pugnalin at the City of Cape Town are thanked for advice regarding the inclusion of the BioNet. We are very grateful to the South African National Biodiversity Institute for providing funding support through the GEF5 Programme towards layout and printing costs of the Handbook. We would like to acknowledge the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Steering Committee, specifically Mervyn Lotter, for granting permission to use the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook as a blueprint for the Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Fish Fact Sheet
    FACT SHEET What a landowner should know about the INDIGENOUS FISH of the Cape Floristic Region: DIVERSITY, THREATS AND MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS The majority of the freshwater The Cape Floristic Region, mainly within the Western Cape Province, fish of the Cape Floristic is one of the six plant kingdoms of the world. This area, however, is Region are listed as either not only home to a remarkable number of plant species but also has a Endangered or Critically Endangered and face a very number of unique indigenous freshwater fish species. real risk of extinction! INDIGENOUS FISH are a critical component of healthy aquatic ecosystems as they form an important part of the aquatic food web and fulfill several important ecological functions. These fish need suitable habitat and good quality water, free of sediment and agrichemicals, in order to survive. The presence of indigenous fish is one of the signs of a healthy riverine Cape kurper ecosystem, making indigenous fish good bio-indicators of healthy rivers. There are four main river systems in the Western Cape, namely the Berg, Breede, Gourits and Olifants, and each system has unique fish species which only occur in ecologically healthy parts of these rivers. A good example is Burchell’s redfin in the Breede and neighbouring river systems. Genetic research on this species indicates that there could be three distinct species in the Cape galaxias Breede system. The Olifants River system is however recognised as the hotspot for indig- enous fish diversity as this system has the highest number of unique indigenous species. Research is ongoing and further genetic diversity is being uncovered for other species such as the Cape kurper and the Cape galaxias.
    [Show full text]
  • Berg River Baseline Monitoring Programme
    BERG RIVER BASELINE MONITORING PROGRAMME FINAL REPORT - VOLUME 5: Synthesis DWAF Report No. P WMA 19/G10/00/2107 Edited by: BARRY CLARK and GEORDIE RACTLIFFE October 2007 The Freshwater Consulting Group E N V I R O N M E N T A L BERG RIVER BASELINE MONITORING PROGRAMME FINAL REPORT - VOLUME 5: Synthesis DWAF Report No. P WMA 19/G10/00/2107 Edited by: BARRY CLARK AND GEORDIE RACTLIFFE October 2007 The Freshwater Consulting Group E N V I R O N M E N T A L Department of Zoology University of Cape Town Rondebosch 7701 University of Cape Town, South Africa PO Box 34035, Rhodes Gift 7707 Cell: 082 463 0222 www.uct.ac.za/depts/zoology/anchor Tel: +27 (21) 650 4767 Tel/Fax +27 21 685 3400 Fax: +27 (21) 650 3301 [email protected] Email: [email protected] Berg River Baseline Monitoring Programme Final Report: Volume5, September 2007 Index TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................2 1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE BERG RIVER CATCHMENT, HYDROLOGY AND GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT ...............................................................................2 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BERG RIVER..........................................................................................................................2 1.4 ESTUARINE ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................2 1.5 SOCIAL AND RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES ASSESSMENT......................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Deficiencies in Our Understanding of the Hydro-Ecology of Several Native Australian Fish: a Rapid Evidence Synthesis
    Marine and Freshwater Research, 2018, 69, 1208–1221 © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Supplementary material Deficiencies in our understanding of the hydro-ecology of several native Australian fish: a rapid evidence synthesis Kimberly A. MillerA,D, Roser Casas-MuletB,A, Siobhan C. de LittleA, Michael J. StewardsonA, Wayne M. KosterC and J. Angus WebbA,E ADepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia. BWater Research Institute, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK. CArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. DPresent address: Healesville Sanctuary, Badger Creek Road, Healesville, Vic. 3777, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email address: [email protected] Page 1 of 30 Marine and Freshwater Research © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Table S1. All papers located by standardised searches and following citation trails for the two rapid evidence assessments All papers are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a reading of the title and abstract. Those deemed relevant on the first screen are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a full assessment of the reference.The table contains incomplete citation details for a number of irrelevant papers. The information provided is as returned from the different evidence databases. Given that these references were not relevant to our review, we have not sought out the full citation details. Source Reference Relevance Relevance (based on title (after reading and abstract) full text) Pygmy perch & carp gudgeons Search hit Anon (1998) Soy protein-based formulas: recommendations for use in infant feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Abiotic Events Or Human‐Aided Dispersal
    Historical abiotic events or human-aided dispersal: inferring the evolutionary history of a newly discovered galaxiid fish Gamuchirai Chakona1,2, Ernst R. Swartz2 & Albert Chakona2 1Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, P. O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa 2South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Keywords Abstract Cape Floristic Region, Galaxias, interbasin dispersal, mitochondrial DNA, nuclear DNA, Range expansion of obligate freshwater fishes in the Cape Floristic Region phylogeography. (CFR) of South Africa has mostly been attributed to river capture events and confluence of rivers following sea-level regression. The role of low drainage Correspondence divides and interbasin water transfers has received less attention. This study Gamuchirai Chakona, South African Institute analyzed mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences to assess the processes that for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, could have influenced the phylogeographic patterns of a newly discovered line- Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Tel: 046 6035800; Fax: +27 46 622 2403; age of Galaxias zebratus (hereafter Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina”) that occurs E-mail: [email protected] across two currently isolated river systems close to the Joubertina area in the eastern CFR. Results from both analyses revealed that observed genetic differen- Funding Information tiation cannot be explained by isolation between the two river systems. No Funding was provided by the South African genetic differentiation was found between the Krom River system and a popula- Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB) and tion from one of the Gamtoos tributaries. Shallow genetic differentiation was the Rhodes University Margaret Smith found between the Krom and the other Gamtoos populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of Endangered Freshwater Fishes – Linking Conservation of Endangered Freshwater Fishes with River Conservation, Focussing on the Cederberg
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF ENDANGERED FRESHWATER FISHES – LINKING CONSERVATION OF ENDANGERED FRESHWATER FISHES WITH RIVER CONSERVATION, FOCUSSING ON THE CEDERBERG Report to the Water Research Commission Edited by IR Bills1 and ND Impson2 1South African Institute of Aquatic Biodiversity 2CapeNature WRC Report No. KV 305/12 ISBN 978-1-4312-0348-2 JANUARY 2013 OBTAINABLE FROM Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 Gezina, Pretoria, 0031 South Africa [email protected] or download from www.wrc.org.za The publication of this report emanates from a WRC project entitled Conservation biology of endangered freshwater fishes – Linking conservation of endangered freshwater fishes with river conservation, focusing on the Cederberg. (WRC Project No.K8/592) DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. © WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Water Research Commission for providing the funding for this work. Cape Nature and the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity provided varied logistical support for most of the sub-projects. In particular Mrs. Sally Terry (SAIAB) helped with all aspects of coordination and curation of samples at SAIAB. Dr Olaf Weyl co-supervised Vusi Mthombeni’s MSc work and together with R. Bills provided additional funding for the catfish biology study. iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No 1 Introduction .………………………………………………………….…………….......1 Roger Bills and Dean Impson 2 Barnard’s rock catfish (Austroglanis barnardi).…………………….…………….5 Roger Bills 3 Clanwilliam roc catfish (Austroglanis gilli).………………………………………17 Roger Bills 4 Twee River redfin (Barbus erubescens) …………………………….……………30 Roger Bills 5 A study of the maintenance and culture requirements of Barbus erubescens, Austroglanis barnardi and A.
    [Show full text]