Environmental Assessment Volume 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment Volume 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1 NUECES, KLEBERG, KENEDY, WILLACY, AND CAMERON COUNTIES CSJ: 1111-07-004 Prepared by: US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas Division And Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi and Pharr Districts June 2012 Environmental Assessment US 77 CSJ: 1111-07-004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 - INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Freeway Standards............................................................................................. 3 1.1.2 Planning and Programming Status...................................................................... 4 1.1.3 Corridor Trade Influences ................................................................................... 7 SECTION 2.0 - NEED AND PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ................................10 2.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT ..........................................................................................10 2.1.1 At-Grade Intersections Compromise Safety on this High-Speed Facility ............10 2.1.2 At-Grade Intersections within the Project Limits Experience Higher Crash Rates ..........................................................................................................................10 2.1.3 Projected Increases in Traffic on US 77 Will Increase the Potential for Incidents Associated with the Numerous At-Grade Intersections ......................................12 2.1.4 System Continuity Does Not Meet Driver Expectations......................................14 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT .....................................................................................14 SECTION 3.0 - DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ...............................................................15 3.1 OPTIONS EVALUATED ................................................................................................16 3.1.1 Options Considered ...........................................................................................16 3.1.2 Options Dismissed from Detailed Further Study.................................................27 3.2 ALTERNATIVES ADVANCED FOR DETAILED STUDY ...............................................32 3.2.1 Existing Facility – No Build Alternative ...............................................................32 3.2.2 Proposed Facility – Build Alternative..................................................................32 3.3 SELECTION OF THE BUILD ALTERNATIVE................................................................37 SECTION 4.0 - AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ....38 4.1 ROW DISPLACEMENTS/RELOCATIONS ....................................................................38 4.1.1 Legal and Regulatory Context............................................................................38 4.1.2 No Build Alternative – ROW Displacements/Relocations Consequences...........39 4.1.3 Build Alternative – ROW Displacements/Relocations Consequences ................39 4.2 SOCIOECONOMIC DATA.............................................................................................46 4.2.1 Demographics....................................................................................................46 4.2.2 LEP Populations ................................................................................................47 4.2.3 Economics .........................................................................................................50 4.2.4 Community Cohesion.........................................................................................57 4.2.5 Visual Quality and Aesthetics.............................................................................62 4.2.6 No Build Alternative – Socioeconomic Consequences .......................................67 4.2.7 Build Alternative – Socioeconomic Consequences.............................................67 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE........................................................................................69 4.3.1 Population, Race, and Ethnicity .........................................................................70 4.3.2 Income...............................................................................................................72 4.3.3 Household Occupancy.......................................................................................76 4.3.4 Tolling and Environmental Justice - Overview....................................................79 4.3.5 No Build Alternative – Environmental Justice Consequences.............................87 4.3.6 Build Alternative – Environmental Justice Consequences..................................87 4.4 LAND USE ....................................................................................................................93 4.4.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................93 4.4.2 Local Land Use Plans/Policies ...........................................................................96 4.4.3 Legislation and Other Regulations .....................................................................99 June 2012 i Environmental Assessment US 77 CSJ: 1111-07-004 4.4.4 No Build Alternative – Land Use Consequences..............................................101 4.4.5 Build Alternative – Land Use Consequences ...................................................101 4.5 PRIME FARMLANDS INCLUDING SOILS ..................................................................102 4.5.1 Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................102 4.5.2 No Build Alternative – Prime Farmlands Consequences ..................................104 4.5.3 Build Alternative – Prime Farmlands Consequences........................................104 4.6 VEGETATION/WILDLIFE HABITATS..........................................................................105 4.6.1 Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................105 4.6.2 No Build Alternative – Vegetation /Wildlife Habitats Consequences.................111 4.6.3 Build Alternative – Vegetation /Wildlife Habitats Consequences ......................111 4.7 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES .........................................................114 4.7.1 Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................115 4.7.2 No Build Alternative – Threatened and Endangered Species Consequences ..138 4.7.3 Build Alternative – Threatened and Endangered Species Consequences........138 4.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES ..........................................................................................142 4.8.1 Historic Resources...........................................................................................143 4.8.2 Archeology.......................................................................................................147 4.9 SECTION 4(F) AND SECTION 6(F) RESOURCES.....................................................151 4.9.1 Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................151 4.9.2 No Build Alternative – Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Resources Consequences ........................................................................................................................151 4.9.3 Build Alternative – Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Resources Consequences.....151 4.10 WATER RESOURCES/WATER QUALITY ..................................................................151 4.10.1 Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................152 4.10.2 No Build Alternative – Water Resources and Water Quality Consequences.....162 4.10.3 Build Alternative – Water Resources and Water Quality Consequences ..........162 4.11 AIR QUALITY..............................................................................................................170 4.11.1 Traffic Air Quality Analysis (TAQA) ..................................................................170 4.11.2 Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs) ..................................................................171 4.11.3 No Build Alternative – Air Quality Consequences.............................................179 4.11.4 Build Alternative – Air Quality Consequences ..................................................179 4.12 NOISE.........................................................................................................................179 4.12.1 No Build Alternative – Noise Consequences....................................................190 4.12.2 Build Alternative – Noise Consequences .........................................................190 4.13 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.........................................................................................191 4.13.1 No Build Alternative – Hazardous Materials Consequences.............................191 4.13.2 Build Alternative – Hazardous Materials Consequences ..................................191 4.14 UTILITY RELOCATION IMPACTS ..............................................................................198 4.14.1 No Build Alternative – Utilities Consequences..................................................198 4.14.2 Build Alternative – Utilities Consequences .......................................................198
Recommended publications
  • Victory! Victory Over Japan Day Is the Day on Which Japan Surrendered in World War II, in Effect Ending the War
    AugustAAuugugusstt 201622001166 BRINGING HISTORY TO LIFE See pages 24-26! Victory! Victory over Japan Day is the day on which Japan surrendered in World War II, in effect ending the war. The term has been applied to both of the days on which the initial announcement of Japan’s surrender was made – to the afternoon of August 15, 1945, in Japan, and, because of time zone differences, to August 14, 1945. AmericanAmerican servicemenservicemen andand womenwomen gathergather inin frontfront ofof “Rainbow“Rainbow Corner”Corner” RedRed CrossCross clubclub inin ParisParis toto celebratecelebrate thethe unconditionalunconditional surrendersurrender ofof thethe Japanese.Japanese. 1515 AugustAugust 19451945 Over 200 NEW & RESTOCK Items Inside These Pages! • PLASTICPPLAASSSTTIIC MODELM KITS • MODEL ACCESSORIES • BOOKS & MAGAZINES • PAINTS & TOOLS • GIFTS & COLLECTIBLES See back cover for full details. Order Today at WWW.SQUADRON.COM or call 1-877-414-0434 August Cover Version 1.indd 1 7/7/2016 1:02:36 PM Dear Friends One of the most important model shows this year is taking place in Columbia, South Carolina in August…The IPMS Nationals. SQUADRON As always, the team from Squadron will be there to meet you. We look forward to this event because it gives us a chance to PRODUCTS talk to you all in person. It is the perfect time to hear any sugges- tions you might have so we can serve you even better. If you are at the Nationals, please stop by our booth to say hello. We can’t wait to meet you and hear all about your hobby experi- ences. On top of that, you’ll receive a Squadron shopping bag NEW with goodies! Our booth number is 819.
    [Show full text]
  • Talent Management Analysis for the Air Wing of the Future
    NPS-HR-20-024 ACQUISITION RESEARCH PROGRAM SPONSORED REPORT SERIES Talent Management Analysis for the Air Wing of the Future December 2019 LCDR Michael J. Bartolf, USN LCDR Louis D’Antonio, USN Thesis Advisors: William D. Hatch, Senior Lecturer Dr. Robert F. Mortlock, Professor Graduate School of Defense Management Naval Postgraduate School Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943. Acquisition Research Program Graduate School of Defense Management Naval Postgraduate School The research presented in this report was supported by the Acquisition Research Program of the Graduate School of Defense Management at the Naval Postgraduate School. To request defense acquisition research, to become a research sponsor, or to print additional copies of reports, please contact the Acquisition Research Program (ARP) via email, [email protected] or at 831-656-3793. Acquisition Research Program Graduate School of Defense Management Naval Postgraduate School ABSTRACT The Air Wing of the Future (AWOTF) will provide unmatched lethality and capability in future theaters of operations. The addition of the F-35C Lightning II, MQ-25 Stingray, and CMV-22B to the combat proven team of F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, EA-18G Growlers, E-2D Hawkeyes, and MH-60R/S Seahawks also comes with increased manpower support requirements over today's carrier air wing. The increased complement of personnel necessary to operate the AWOTF will either require a multimillion-dollar ship modification to the baseline design, or a reduction to the individual squadron manpower documents. The objective of this capstone was to analyze manpower talent management, maintenance training, and squadron-level maintenance activities to determine whether a training improvement solution could substantiate a manpower reduction by creating a higher-quality, more capable work force.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Air Station Kingsville 2020
    Texas Military Preparedness Commission Office of the Governor Naval Air Station Kingsville 2020 MISSION The primary mission of NAS Kingsville is to provide facilities and support for Training Air Wing Two in producing undergraduate jet/strike pilots for the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps. Pilot production is the responsibility of Training Air Wing Two and its two training squadrons, VT-21 and VT-22 which utilize the Boeing T-45 Goshawk aircraft. NAS Kingsville trains 50 percent of the jet strike pilots for the Navy and Marine Corps. TENANT COMMANDS PARTNERSHIPS Training Air Wing Two is comprised of NAS Kingsville coordinates events with the City of Kingsville Training Squadron Twenty One (VT-21) throughout the year. One of the most popular events is the Wings Over and Training Squadron Twenty Two (VT- South Texas Air show, featuring the U.S. Navy Blue Angels. The base 22) where 200 students report for advanced participates in a variety of school programs and provide honor guard and undergraduate jet strike training. The support. Other community events such as the King Ranch “Ranch training takes between 11-13 months where Hand” Breakfast and Pilot/Skipper for a Day. Local higher education students will earn the designation of “Naval provides additional opportunities at Texas A&M University - Kingsville Aviators”. and Coastal Bend College. NAS Kingsville supports over 29,000 military veterans and their families within a 100 mile radius. Other tenants include The U.S. Army Reserve Component, made of F Company Variable Total Impact and the 370th Transportation Company. 1,647 Branch Health Clinic Kingsville, L-3 Direct Employment Technologies, Fidelity Technologies, Inc., Output to the Texas Economy (in millions) $852 Rolls Royce, Inc., and CNATRA Contract Maintenance Detachment.
    [Show full text]
  • South Texas Military Complex Provides DOD a Unique Set Of
    DCN: 10908 South Texas Military Complex Provides DOD A Unique Set of Capabilities on the Gulf Coast South Texas Has Abundant Existing Airfield & Airspace Operational Capacity McMullen Expansion Offers F/A-18 Training Range Only 70 Miles From NAS Kingsville - I "The McMullen County Commissioner's Court wanted to go on the record in support of attracting a master jet base for the F-18 Hornet to Swth Texas. We support a 20,000 acre expansion of the approximately 10,000-acre range currently located in our county." - ti* 4- m,cIwr,trJMSp 'There is no reason known at this time why the expansion would be any more damaging, except 1 in scale, than the existing target range 7,; operations." E - &bi& &leer, wm Cwstel &md #em Uub 8/UOS - C__ Re Re Tht - The Texas National Guard has already - - begun an environmental assessment of - expansion of the McMullen Range. 3- Commuting Times from NAS Kingsville CC Bay Area Is A Great Place to Live RegionalShopping Concentrations @ Higher Education Centen - - Available Housing in South Texas + Residential Housing Available - Aug. 2005 Kingsville - 129 units Corpus Christi MLS (Nueces-San Patriao Counties) 1,551 Single Family Houses Average Sales Price - $142,867 204 Condo/Townhouses + Apartment Inventory 30,000 Units (Kieberg, Nueces, San Patricio Counties) Added 1,50Q units last year $99,500 - 1,350 Sq Ft 596 units under construction 93% occupancy (8105) 2,100 units available for rent Average monthly apartment rents Housing Is Affordable KINGSVILE CORPUS CHRIST1 Southside CORPUS CHRIST1 Southside $131,900 - 1,509 Sq R 82551?00 - 3,040 % Ft $219,900 - 2,305 Sq Ft KINGSVILLE CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI South $97,900 - 1,350 Sq 169,000 - 1,856 Sq Ft KINGSVILLE Sources: Realtor.com; Homes.com; MSN House 8 Home 2005 with Sperling's BestPlaces Memorandum For the Record NAS Kingsville, TX On 8 July 2005, Commissioner Hill, accompanied by William Fetzer, NavyIMarine Corps Senior BRAC Staff Analyst, joined Congressman Ortiz and his staff on a two hour aerial tour of the Corpus Christi-Ingleside-Kingsvillemilitary facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navy Hymn
    Virginia Beach Elks Our Mission as Elks Lodge # 2268 To inculcate the principles of Charity, Justice, Brotherly Love and Fidelity; to recognize a belief in God; to promote the welfare and enhance the happiness of its Members; to quicken the spirit of American patriotism; to cultivate goo d fellowship; to perpetuate itself as a fraternal organization, and to provide for Flag Day Ceremony its government, the Benevolent and Protective At the Flame of Hope Order of Elks of the United States of America will serve the people and communities through 671 S Oceana Blvd, benevolent programs, demonstrating that Sunday, June 5th, 2016 Elks Care and Elks Share. 11am PROGRAM BPOE Flag Day Welcome Guests Patriotism has characterized the Paul Shoemaker, Past Exalted Ruler Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America Introductory since the early days of the Ivan Kuhn, Exalted Ruler organization. Allegiance to the flag of our country is a requirement of Presentation of Colors By every member. IWTC Virginia Beach IT1 Shaw, IT1 Taylor, IT2 King, IT1 Graves In 1907, the Grand Lodge of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks designated, by resolution, June Invocation 14, as Flag Day. The Grand Lodge of the Order adopted Irene Kuhn, Chaplain mandatory observance of the occasion by every Lodge in 1911, and that requirement continues. The Flag: It’s History Bonnie Shoemaker The Elks prompted President Woodrow Wilson to recognize the Order's observance of Flag Day for its Flag Bearers patriotic expression. Military Veterans But it was not until 1949 when President Harry Truman, Response himself a member of the Elks, made the proclamation Karyn Swenor, Past Exalted Ruler that thereafter June 14, would be a day of national observance for the symbol of our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Military Value Task Force 2018 Strategic Report
    G O V E R N O R G R E G A B B O T T TEXAS MILITARY PREPAREDNESS COMMISSION October 5, 2018 Dear Governor Abbott, The Texas Military Value Task Force under the Texas Military Preparedness Commission thanks you for your support, as the latest report has been completed and provided to you. Each of the seven members has traveled across the state to discuss what makes Texas the best place to house and grow current and future military missions and enhance our communities. After visiting with installation commanders and staff, military support groups, and military communities, Texas can confidently say we have one of the greatest gifts and opportunities in the nation to support the military. Texas provides an excellent home to hundreds of current (and future) military missions across the state. Military communities are supportive and present for anything military members and their families need. Texas is in an excellent position to grow or gain new military missions and personnel and leverage existing investments. However, we still have more to do. Each installation has strengths and opportunities that have been identified and some even have recommendations for you and the Legislature. One of the most effective ways of helping the military and our military communities is utilizing funding through the DEAAG program. The return on investment is extremely high, ranging between 100% and 150% based on the amount of funding the state provides to grantees. Past projects include upgrading security standards at gates and airfields; providing training opportunities for employees; and reinforcing critical infrastructure. Texas has served as a Department of Defense role model for many of these projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioning Ceremony Spring 2020
    Commissioning Ceremony Spring 2020 The Capital Battalion Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps Fifteen May Two Thousand Twenty Overview Section Page The Capital Battalion ……………………………………………………………………………….3 Message from the Class of 2020 ………………………………………………………………..4 Message from the Battalion ………………………………………………………………………5 The Naval Officer …………………………………………………………………………………..6 The Marine ……………………………………………………………………………………………7 Commanding Officer ……………………………………………………………………………..8 Executive Officer …………………………………………………………………………………..9 Commissioning Speaker ………………………………………………………………………..10 Commissioning Oath and Significance ……………………………………………………11 Class of 2020 ………………………………………………………………………………….12-19 Photos …………………………………………………………………………………………..20-22 Semper Fortis Semper Fidelis 2 The Capital Battalion NROTC The Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) Program was established in 1926 to train qualified young men and women for service as commissioned officers in the Navy or Marine Corps. It is the largest single source of officers for both the Navy and Marine Corps. Each year, students compete for scholarships worth in excess of $180,000, chosen based on not just academic excellence but physical fitness and moral character as well. The Capital Battalion, established in 1984, is composed of over 100 Midshipmen from four different schools including the George Washington University, Georgetown University, Howard University, and the Catholic University of America. Midshipmen are required to complete the course of study prescribed by the college or university they attend. Midshipmen are also required to take several naval science courses in addition to their college’s prescribed course load. Due to the increasing complexity of today’s Navy, Navy Option Midshipmen are required to complete two semesters of calculus before the end of their sophomore year and two semesters of calculus-based physics by the end of their junior year. Upon graduation, Midshipmen are commissioned as Ensigns in the Navy or Second Lieutenants in the Marine Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II Section IV - Near East
    Volume II Section IV - Near East Algeria CTFP - Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Defense On-Going Training Course Title Qty Training Location Student's Unit US Unit - US Qty Total Cost NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL 699 SPECIAL OPERATIONS -MS 4 MONTEREY, CA Algerian Land Forces $277,388 MONTEREY CA - N/A CTFP HOMELAND DEFENSE SHORT COURSE 4 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY Algerian Land Froces Command NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY - N/A $86,762 Fiscal Year 2011 On-Going Program Totals 8 $364,150 IMET-1 - Fiscal Year 2011 Department of State On-Going Training Course Title Qty Training Location Student's Unit US Unit - US Qty Total Cost AIR COMD & STAFF COLLEGE 4 MAXWELL AFB, AL Algerian Air Force MAXWELL AFB, AL - N/A $101,160 AIR WAR COLLEGE 4 MAXWELL AFB, AL Algerian Air Defense Command MAXWELL AFB, AL - N/A $129,944 ARMY WAR COLLEGE (RESIDENT COURSE) 4 ARMY WAR COLLEGE Algerian Special Forces Command ARMY WAR COLLEGE - N/A $132,844 ARNG PRE-RANGER COURSE 4 ARNG WARRIOR TRNG CTR Algerian Special Forces ARNG WARRIOR TRNG CTR - N/A $13,302 BASIC ALC INSTRUCTOR COURSE 4 DLIELC, LACKLAND AFB TX Algerian Air Force DLIELC, LACKLAND AFB TX - N/A $47,398 COMMAND & GENERAL STAFF COLLEGE INTERMEDIATE LEVEL EDUC 4 COMMAND & GENERAL STAFF COLLEGE Algerian Land Forces Command $133,694 - N/A NAVAL COMMAND COLLEGE NEWPORT NAVAL COMMAND COLLEGE 4 NAVAL COMMAND COLLEGE NEWPORT RI Algerian Navy $240,838 RI - N/A NAVAL STAFF COLLEGE NEWPORT RI - NAVAL STAFF COL - 10 MONTH 4 NAVAL STAFF COLLEGE NEWPORT RI Algerian Naval Command $238,606 N/A NWC INTERNATIONAL FELLOWS
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Adkins Air Force, Retired
    Our Grandview Family Veterans Day Donald Adkins Air Force, Retired Senior Master Sgt. Donald Adkins, USAF, retired from the US Air Force in 1987 after a 20 year career. He served as an Air Traffic Controller in the Philippines during the Vietnam War. His experience also included numerous tours throughout the US. Donald is the grandfather of Emily Barboa, Class of 2014. I joined the U. S. Navy from a local recruiting office here in Denver a year Reilanda Anckle after I graduated from East High School in 1985. My first tour of duty, after Basic training in Orlando Florida, was in Ne Makri Greece for three years. I initially worked as a cook, called a Mess Management Specialist. Navy After my tour in Greece I was sent to Guantanamo Bay to meet my Ship, the USS Puget Sound, (AD-38) a Tender Destroyer Ship. While assigned there for a couple of years I toured the middle east. Our ship went through the Suez Canal and we crossed the equator, not necessarily in that order. When my tour on board my ship ended I went to Military Police Investigator School at Lack land Air Force Base TX and off to Hawaii after training. I stayed in for several years and got out in 1993 for a brief time to take care of my grandparents while participating in the active Navy Reserves here at Buckley Air Force Base. I went back in to Active Duty in 1998 and had to change my job from Military Police Investigator and I became a Religious Program Specialist for the duration of my time in the Navy, excluding my timed served as a Navy Recruiter (2005-2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II Section VI - Western Hemisphere
    UNCLASSIFIED Volume II Section VI - Western Hemisphere Antigua and Barbuda IMET-1 - Fiscal Year 2010 Department of State On-Going Training Course Title Qty Location Student's Unit US Units Total Cost MANEUVER CAPTAINS CAREER (LEGACY) 1 USATC ANTIGUA DEFENSE FORCE USATC 7487 MANEUVER CAPTAINS CAREER (LEGACY) 1 USATC ANTIGUA DEFENSE FORCE USATC 7487 Fiscal Year 2010 Program Totals 2 $14,974 Antigua and Barbuda Fiscal Year 2010 Totals 2 $14,974 Antigua and Barbuda Fiscal Year 2011 Planned Program Totals 0 $0 Antigua and Barbuda Total 2 $14,974 Argentina CTFP - Fiscal Year 2010 Department of Defense On-Going Training Course Title Qty Location Student's Unit US Units Total Cost MARITIME SECURITY INSTITUTE PROGRAM IN ADVANCED SECURITY STUDIES (PASS) 1 MARSHALL CENTER MARSHALL CENTER 11800 ARGENTINE COAST GUARD MARITIME SECURITY INSTITUTE PROGRAM IN ADVANCED SECURITY STUDIES (PASS) 1 MARSHALL CENTER MARSHALL CENTER 11800 ARGENTINE COAST GUARD Fiscal Year 2010 Program Totals 2 $23,600 FMS - Fiscal Year 2010 Department of State On-Going Training Course Title Qty Location Student's Unit US Units Total Cost RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL 360 OPNS RESEARCH 1 MONTEREY, CA 70142 DEPARTMENT MONTEREY CA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL 360 OPNS RESEARCH 1 MONTEREY, CA 70142 DEPARTMENT MONTEREY CA ADVANCED ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROGRAM 1 DLIELC, LACKLAND AFB TX V AIR BRIGADE, VILLA REYNOLDS DLIELC, LACKLAND AFB TX 5510 ADVANCED ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROGRAM 1 DLIELC, LACKLAND AFB TX V AIR BRIGADE, VILLA REYNOLDS DLIELC, LACKLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Jimmie W. Taylor, RADM USN (Ret.) Duty Assignment Chronology Summary of Significant Career Events
    1958 2003 Jimmie W. Taylor, RADM USN (Ret.) Duty Assignment Chronology “Jimmie” 10/58-7/59 VF-124 (DUINS) (TV-2 F-8). Date of Designation: 30 September 1958 7/59-11/61 VF-142 Ordinance Officer, Welfare Officer, NAS Miramar (F-8). Dates of Active Duty: 28 February 1957 - 1 August 1991 11/61-6/62 VF-132 Supply Oficer, NAS Cecil (F-8). 6/62-8/62 Naval Justice School, Naval Base, Newport, Total Flight Hours: 4,988 RI (DUINS). 8/62-8/65 VF-174 Weapons Training Officer, NAS Cecil Carrier/Ship Landings: Fixed wing: 997 Field, FL (F-8). 8/65-10/65 VX-4, NAS Pt Mugu, CA (C-45). Approximate Flight Hours: 10/65-9/67 USS Constellation (CVA 64) Air Launch Jet: 4,500 Prop: 488 VF/VA: 4,500 Missile OFFICER (C-1, T-28). VT: 488 9/67-6/68 VF-124 Asst. Ops.Off., NAS Miramar (F-8). 6/68-8/70 VF-51 Ops. Officer, NAS Miramar USS Combat Tours: Bon Homme Richard (F-8H/J). Vietnam: USS Constellation (CVA-64), Apr. 1966- Oct. 8/70-1/74 VF-124 Ops. Officer, NAS Miramar (F-8, 1966 (C-1) TA-4J, F-14). USS Constellation (CVA-64), Mar. 1967-Aug. 1/74-4/75 XO, VF-2, NAS Miramar (F-14). 1967 (C-1) 4/75-6/76 CO, VF-2, NAS Miramar USS Enterprise VF-51, USS Bon Homme Richard, June 1968- (F-14). Oct. 1968 (F-8H) 9/76-12/77 VX-4 Det. OIC, Nellis AFB (F-14).
    [Show full text]
  • (Delete the Examples When Providing Your Input). If Any of the Questions Have Multiple Responses, Please Provide All
    DCN 528 DATA CALL 1: GENERAL INSTALLATION INFORMATION 1. ACTIVITY: Follow example as provided in the table below (delete the examples when providing your input). If any of the questions have multiple responses, please provide all. If any of the information requested is subject to change between now and the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 due to known redesignations, realignments/closures or other action, provide current and projected data and so annotate. Name Official name Naval Air Station, Kingsville, TX Acronym(s) used in NAS Kingsville correspondence Commonly accepted short NAS Kingsville title(s) Complete Mailing Address Commanding Officer Naval Air Station 802 Dealey Ave, Suite 209 Kingsville, TX 78363-5027 PLAD NAS Kingsville TX PRIMARY UIC: 60241 (Plant Account UIC for Plant Account Holders) Enter this number as the Activity identifier at the top of each Data Call response page. ALL OTHER UIC(s): 30776 PURPOSE: NUManpower 30780 McMullen Manpower 42095 Undergrad Pilot Trng Manpower 45765 Counseling & Asst Manpower Manpower 2. PLANT ACCOUNT HOLDER: Yes X No - (check one) 3. ACTIVITY TYPE: Choose most appropriate type that describes your activity and completely answer all questions. HOST COMMAND: A host command is an activity that provides facilities for its own functions and the functions of other (tenant) activities. A host has accountability for Class 1 (land), and/or Class 2 (buildings, structures, and utilities) property, regardless of occupancy. It can also be a tenant at other host activities. Yes X No - (check one) TENANT COMMAND: A tenant command is an activity or unit that occupies facilities for which another activity (i.e., the host) has accountability.
    [Show full text]